Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prop Case 8 - 19 Gestopa vs. Court of Appeals, 342 SCRA 105, G.R. No. 111904 October 5, 2000
Prop Case 8 - 19 Gestopa vs. Court of Appeals, 342 SCRA 105, G.R. No. 111904 October 5, 2000
Prop Case 8 - 19 Gestopa vs. Court of Appeals, 342 SCRA 105, G.R. No. 111904 October 5, 2000
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
105
1/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
SECOND DIVISION.
106
106
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158450365d5771bed70003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
2/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
Id. at 2133.
Id.at 1020.
Id. at 66.
107
107
3/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
Id. at 7879.
Id. at 14.
108
108
tion was for the donation to take effect upon the death of
the donor. Further, the donation was void for it left the
donor, Diego Danlag, without any property at all.
On December 27, 1991, the trial court rendered its
decision, thus:
WHEREFORE, the foregoing considered, the Court hereby
renders judgment in favor of the defendants and against the
plaintiff:
1. Declaring the Donations Mortis Causa and Inter Vivos as
revoked, and, therefore, has (sic) no legal effect and force
of law.
2. Declaring Diego Danlag the absolute and exclusive owner
of the six (6) parcels of land mentioned in the Deed of
revocation (Exh. Pplaintiff, Exh. 6defendant Diego
Danlag).
3. Declaring the Deeds of Sale executed by Diego Danlag in
favor of spouses Agripino Gestopa and Isabel Gestopa
dated June 28, 1979 (Exh. Splaintiff Exh. 18defendant)
Deed of Sale dated December 18, 1979 (Exh. T plaintiff
Exh. 9defendant) Deed of Sale dated September 14, 1979
(Exh. 8) Deed of Sale dated June 30, 1975 (Exh. U) Deed
of Sale dated March 13, 1978 (Exh. X) as valid and
enforceable duly executed in accordance with the
formalities required by law.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158450365d5771bed70003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
4/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
SO ORDERED.
109
5/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
110
SO ORDERED.
6/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
Id. at 3132.
10
Id. at 5.
11
111
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158450365d5771bed70003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
7/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
13
14
15
Reyes vs. Mosqueda, 187 SCRA 661, 671 (1990) Concepcion vs.
112
8/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
17
113
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158450365d5771bed70003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
9/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
Rollo, p. 79.
114
114
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158450365d5771bed70003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
10/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
Art. 765. The donation may also be revoked at the instance of the
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158450365d5771bed70003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
11/12
11/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME342
Copyright2016CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158450365d5771bed70003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
12/12