*

, , ,
, , (),
(), ,
:

,

:


:
:
,
:
.


, 1:

:
.

:

* 17.08.2016
1 . , , ., , ,
2008, 110-111, . - //
: . .: , 1973, 203, .
// . .: , 1972, 84:

Page 1 of 11

,
, ,
:

() , 3 (55), -, 2016

.
. .

 ,
( )
, :
, ,
,
, ,
:

:
,
, ,

.
: ,

, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
: (,
.

, ):
,
:
:

( ,
): --- ,
,
:


, -
:
,
:
, :
:
, :
,
,
,

Page 2 of 11

2 . . . 2. .; .: , 2002,
120-121. . // :
. .: , 1983, 232-233, 235:
3 . // . : . .: , 2010, . 86:
4 . // . . 4- . . 1. .:
; : -, 2000, 649-650, . . . I.
44-74. : ; -, 2003, 261:
5 ., . , . .: , 2004, . 41:
6 . (
). .: , 1969, 212:
7 . // . . 6. , 2003, 48:

, ,

. .
( ) // .

Page 3 of 11

() , 3 (55), -, 2016

:
:

,
: ,
:

2: ,

.
:
: ,
3:
,

: , ,
,

, , ,

,
4,

,

5:
,
,
.

6: , ,
,
,

,
7:


, ,

:
, :

, ,


.
,
: :


:

.
,
:

,
, , :

:
, ,
.
,

:

:
: ,
. , . .... .
, 8: ,
:
,

, (,
): ,
,
,

9:
. 1997. . 56. N 3, 22, 23, 30:
8 . // . : . . .: ,
1989, 474:
9 . // . : .
.: , 2004, 378-379, . ,
// . . .: , 2000, 352-354, .
// . : . , 417:

Page 4 of 11

10 . // , 1993, N 2, 81-82.
. . . .: . ., 2001, 105:
11 : . .: , 1993, 182:
12 . .
// . . . .: , 1984, 70:
13 . , . ., 29:
14 . // . . .: , 1993, 262-270:

Page 5 of 11

() , 3 (55), -, 2016

, 1960-

:
, .

. .
, , ,
, , ,

, ,
10, . .

. ,
, 11:
,
, , :

, ,
,
( , , ,
, -):

: (Ergon) ,
(Energeia)12,- ,
:
, 13,-

,
:

, ,
:
,
, , ` 14:

, :
,
, ,

, ,
: ,


,
,
:

,
,
:
-
. Tln-
:
:
, : ,
, ,

15:
16 :

, ,
:
. Tln 17:
,
, :
,
,
, , ,
:
,
: ,

: ,
, : ,
( )
,
.
. , , , ,
18:
(
,
):
,
15 ., Tln, Ucbar, Orbis Tertius // ., ,
., , 1992, 18:
16 ., . : . : -;
.: , 2010, 604-625, 805-851:
17 ., . ., 24:
18 . . .: , 1995, 164:

Page 6 of 11

19 . . . ., 84:
20 . // . . .: , 1989, 429:
21 , .
. : : , ,
( 1 : 3-4):
22

, ,
,
. . .
// . . VIII. .: , 1978, 259-336:

Page 7 of 11

() , 3 (55), -, 2016

,
:

:
,
,
:
, ,
,
:
,

:
-
, - . .
,
19:
-
,
:

,
,

: ,
, .
, ,
, 20:
,

( )
( )21:
,
, ,

22:

-
:
, ,

 :
,
, , ,

23,
:
-
:
: ( )
:
: ,

:

:

.
,
:
24,- , ,
: ,
(
,
): ,
, ,
.

25:
.
, ,
26:
-

.
, :

27:
: , , ,
:
: ,
.
,
, , ,
23 , , ., ., 1975, 615-616:
24 . // . : . , 391:
25 . ? // . : ,
. .: , 1996, 18-38:
26 , 14:
27 ., . ., 430:

Page 8 of 11

28 . . . . . .: , 1971, 195:
29 . // . . ., , 2004, 219220:

Page 9 of 11

() , 3 (55), -, 2016

28:
,
: ,
,

, ,
:

:

:
: ,
. (
,
) :
.
,
:
29:
: ,
.
,
, () ,
, ,
:
( ,
,
, ),
, ,
:
, ,
, :

,
-
:
:
: :
,

,
:
.

 :
,
, ,
, , ,
, :

, , ,
:

:
:
, ,
:

, (
,
):
, ,
: ,
, :
,
: ,
,

, :
,
.
, :
, , ,-
:

: , ,
, ,
,
.
,
, ,

Page 10 of 11

Key words text, space, structure, sequence, sender (author), recipient (reader), hermeneutics, post-structuralism.

Spatiality often lays foundation for text characteristics. It is fostered by text

structuality (regardless of its interpretation), as well as by the fact that reasonings on text are, in the first place, based on written text, which, due to its
materiality (a page, a book), occupies part of the space. Textual space is managed by the sender (author) and the recipient (reader). There exists a great
variety of recipient perceptions of the original text to which evaluation criteria, accepted in pragmatics for a single utterance, are not applicable. In classical
hermeneutics all the meaning-making rights in the text are granted to the author: the role of the reader is reduced to the revelation of the authors idea.
Post-structuralism, on the contrary, enunciates the death of the author and
entrusts absolute textual space organization freedom to the reader. Optimal is
the cooperation model, in which the reader, to some extent, becomes a coauthor, and the author becomes a co-reader.

.
, , ,
, (),
(), , .

.
,
, ,
,
(, ) .
() (

).

,
,
.
: .
, ,

. ,
, .

Page 11 of 11

Ashot S. Abrahamyan

() , 3 (55), -, 2016

HORIZONS OF TEXTUAL SPACE

Summary