Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Miner's Rule and Cumulative Damage Models
Miner's Rule and Cumulative Damage Models
MinersRuleandCumulativeDamageModels
weibull.comhome
SiteMenu
Software Used
ALTA
Miners Rule
Miners rule is probably the simplest cumulative damage model. It states that if there are k different stress levels and the average
number of cycles to failure at the ith stress, Si, is Ni, then the damage fraction, C, is:
(1)
where:
ni is the number of cycles accumulated at stress Si.
C is the fraction of life consumed by exposure to the cycles at the different stress levels. In general, when the damage
fraction reaches 1, failure occurs.
The above equation can be thought of as assessing the proportion of life consumed at each stress level and then adding the
proportions for all the levels together. Often an index for quantifying the damage is defined as the product of stress and the number
of cycles operated under this stress, which is:
Assuming that the critical damage is the same across all the stress levels, then:
(2)
For example, lets say WFailure=50 for a component. So the component will fail after 10 cycles at a stress level of 5, or after 25 cycles
to fail at a stress level of 2, and so on. Using Eqn. (2) as the critical value of damage that will result in failure, Eqn. (1) becomes:
(3)
Example
Lets use a simple example to illustrate how Miners rule is applied to model failures caused by fatigue. Assume we are interested in
the "cycles to failure" of a paper clip. As illustrated in the following figure, a cycle is defined as opening and closing a clip. It is known
that the angle of the two arms of the paper clip affects the number of cycles to failure. So here the "angle" is treated as the "stress."
http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue116/hottopics116.htm
1/4
5/11/2016
MinersRuleandCumulativeDamageModels
Figure 1: One Cycle for a Paper Clip Opening and Closing the Clip
Assume that we know from previous testing that, at an angle of 90 degrees, the average value that causes failure is 5 cycles. So in
this example, WFailure=90x5=450. According to Miners rule, this means that at about 30 degrees, a failure will be observed after
about 15 cycles at an angle of 30 degrees; or an average of 10 cycles will be needed to induce a failure at 45 degrees.
A paper clip has been tested according to the following test profile.
Stress
(Degrees)
15
30
45
Test
Cycles
4
4
4
Damageat
StressLevel
60
120
180
Cumulative
Damage
60
180
360
Based on Miners rule, how many additional cycles at 60 degrees are required in order to break this paper clip? Using Eqn. (3):
We find that x = 1.5 more cycles are needed at 60 degrees in order to break the paper clip.
From the above example, we can see there are several major limitations of Miners rule:
1. Only the expected values are used. It ignores the variation of each test unit and fails to recognize the probabilistic nature of
fatigue.
2. A simple linear lifestress relationship is assumed. This may not be true in many realword applications.
Inverse Power Law Model
To overcome the drawbacks of the Miners rule model, probabilistic models are used in data analysis for accelerated life testing.
There are two key ingredients in probabilistic models:
1. The critical damage that causes failures is not a fixed value. It follows a certain distribution.
2. It is not necessary for the damage to accumulate linearly.
Various lifestress models have been used. [1] The Inverse Power Law model describes the lifestress relationship using a power
function, which is:
(4)
L(S) represents the life at a stress of S. K and n are model parameters. If L(S) is the average life, we can see that Miners rule is a
special case of the Inverse Power Law model. For example, for the previous paper clip example, K=1/450 and n=1. So the life at the
90 degree angle is 5 cycles; at 60 degrees it is:
cycles
However, to consider the probabilistic nature of the failures, instead of letting L(S) be the average life at stress S, it is treated as the
"life characteristic" of a failure time distribution. For example, the pdf for a Weibull distribution is:
(5)
http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue116/hottopics116.htm
2/4
5/11/2016
MinersRuleandCumulativeDamageModels
If we substitute L(S) for the scale parameter , which represents the life characteristic in the Weibull distribution, we obtain the
Inverse Power LawWeibull model:
(6)
Lets use an example to explain the application of the Weibull distribution with the Inverse Power Law lifestress relationship. To
study the number of cycles to failure of a paper clip, the following test data were obtained:
Status(ForS) NumberofCycles Angle(Degrees)
F
30
15
F
33
15
F
28
15
S
35
15
S
35
15
F
18
30
F
20
30
F
15
30
F
12
30
S
20
30
F
11
45
F
12
45
F
8
45
F
15
45
F
10
45
From the above table, we can see that 5 units are tested under each of the stress levels of 15, 30 and 45 degrees. Because of the
suspensions at the stress levels of 15 and 30, it is difficult to use Miners rule because the average cycles to failure are not the
averages of the failure and suspension times at each stress level. Therefore, a Weibull distribution with Inverse Power Law lifestress
relationship is used instead.
http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue116/hottopics116.htm
3/4
5/11/2016
MinersRuleandCumulativeDamageModels
References
[1] ReliaSoft Corporation, Accelerated Life Testing Reference, Tucson, AZ: ReliaSoft Publishing, 2007.
CopyrightReliaSoftCorporation,ALLRIGHTSRESERVED.
Theweibull.comreliabilityengineeringresourcewebsiteisaserviceofReliaSoftCorporation.
Copyright19922016ReliaSoftCorporation.AllRightsReserved.
Aboutweibull.com|AboutReliaSoft|PrivacyStatement|TermsofUse|ContactWebmaster
http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue116/hottopics116.htm
4/4