CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

Planning Commission Report

November 9, 2016
To:

Chair Goodhue and Planning Commissioners

From:

Marc Weiner, AICP, Community Planning and Building Director

Submitted by:

Ashley Hobson, Contract Planner

Subject:

Consideration of Concept Design Study (DS 16-397) and associated Coastal

Development Permits for the construction of a new single-family residence
located in the Single-Family Residential (R-1) Zoning District.

Recommendation:
Accept the Concept Design Study (DS 16-397) and associated Coastal Development Permits subject
to the attached findings and recommendations/draft conditions.
Application:
Block:
Location:
Applicant:

DS 16-397
38
Torres St., 5 NE of 4th Ave.
Bolton Design Group, Inc.

APN:
Lot:

010-103-012
E

Property Owner: Andrea Carr

Background and Project Description:

The project site is a vacant lot located on Torres Street, five parcels northeast of 4th Avenue. The
property is 4,000 square feet in size and includes 16 trees. The applicant has obtained water
credits from the Malpaso Water Company and has submitted plans to build a new 1,795-square
foot single-family residence on the vacant lot. The proposed residence includes 1,595 square feet
of living space, a 200 square foot garage, and 268 square feet of site coverage. The proposed
residence is one-story and will require the removal of eight trees.
Staff has scheduled this application for conceptual review. The primary purpose of this meeting is
to review and consider the site planning, privacy and views, mass and scale related to the project.
However, the Commission may provide input on other aspects of the design.

93

DS 16-397 (Carr)
November 9, 2016
Staff Report
Page 2

PROJECT DATA FOR A 4,000 SQUARE FOOT SITE:

Site Considerations

Allowed

Existing

Proposed

Floor Area

1,800 sf (45%)

1,795 sf (44%)

Site Coverage

396 sf

0 sf

268 sf

Trees

3 Upper /1 Lower
(recommended)

16 total

8 total

Ridge Height (1st/2nd)

18 ft/24 ft

n/a

Max. 1st floor: 18 ft

Plate Height (1st/2nd)

12 ft/18 ft

n/a

Max 1st floor: 8.75 ft

Setbacks

Minimum Required

Existing

Proposed

Front

15 ft

n/a

Minimum: 15ft

Composite Side Yard

10 ft (25%)

n/a

Minimum: 10 ft

Minimum Side Yard

3 ft

n/a

Min. North Side: 3 ft

Min. South Side: 3 ft

Rear

15 ft / 3ft (if less than

15 ft in height)

n/a

Min: 3 ft

Staff analysis:
Forest Character: Residential Design Guidelines 1.1 through 1.4 encourage maintaining a forested
image on the site and for new construction to be at least six feet from significant trees.
The site contains sixteen trees, ten of which are classified as a significant. The applicant is
proposing to remove eight trees on the site, as shown in the table below and maintain the
remaining eight trees on the site. Of the eight trees proposed for removal, two were determined
to be significant, one moderately significant, and five insignificant. The Forest & Beach Commission
reviewed the tree removal application on July 14, 2016 and approved the removal of seven trees to
allow for the construction of a new single-family home (trees #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #12, and #13). The
Forest and Beach Commission approved the removal request with the proviso that all existing trees
maintain a 6-foot root protection zone and that the rear oak tree (#14) is substantially untouched.
Tree #15 is also proposed for removal, however the tree is considered insignificant and therefore
the removal does not require Forest and Beach Commission review. The trees proposed for
removal are clearly shown on the Site Plan on sheet A-0.1 of the Plan Sets, included as Attachment
E.

94

DS 16-397 (Carr)
November 9, 2016
Staff Report
Page 3

Tree #

Tree Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Coast Live Oak

Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Coast Live Oak
Toyon
Coast Live Oak

Tree
Diameter
7
24
35
6
5
15
14
5
5
15
7
2
10
15
3
30

Significant Status?
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Moderately Significant
Significant
Significant
Moderately Significant
Moderately Significant
Significant
Significant
Moderately Significant
Moderately Significant
Significant
Not Significant
Significant

Proposed for
Removal?
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No

Note: Grey rows indicate trees proposed for removal

Privacy & Views: Residential Design Guidelines 5.1 through 5.3 state that designs should preserve
reasonable solar access to neighboring parcels and maintain privacy of indoor and outdoor spaces
in a neighborhood and maintain view opportunities.
Staff has not identified any view impacts that would be created by the new residence. With regard
to privacy, staff notes that both neighboring residences to the north and south are located close to
the property lines and the northern neighbor has large windows facing the project site. In staffs
opinion, the applicant has appropriately placed the windows on the south side of the residence to
adequately protect the privacy of the neighboring residence to the South. Specifically, the
applicant is proposing two high windows which will provide light into the house, but will not allow
views into the neighboring residence. Also, the four largest windows and glass doors will be
located more than 20-feet from the south property line, and a six-foot tall wood fence will help
block views between the neighboring windows.

95

DS 16-397 (Carr)
November 9, 2016
Staff Report
Page 4

With regard to the north neighbor, staff has identified some concerns with the proposed window
placement and the lack of the fencing between the neighboring residences. The applicant is
proposing five windows and two doors within 12-feet of the property line, with three windows as
close as three feet to the property line. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review
the potential privacy impact during the site visit and determine whether a privacy hedge or fence
should be required along the north property line.
Mass & Bulk: Residential Design Guidelines 7.1 through 7.6 encourage a buildings mass to relate
to the context of other homes nearby and to minimize the mass of a building as seen from the
public way or adjacent properties. Further, these guidelines state that a building should relate to
a human scale in its basic forms.
The applicant is proposing to build a new single-family residence on an existing vacant site. In
staffs opinion, the single-story residence is appropriate for the site because it complements the
neighboring single story residences. Residential Design Guideline 6.1 encourages garages to remain
subordinate to the overall character of the site. Specifically, garages should be integrated into the
building design and the mass should be subordinate to the house. Additionally, Design Guideline
7.6 encourages low, horizontal building designs. The proposed garage is integrated into the design
of the house, but has a height of approximately 17 feet, which is 2 feet taller than ridge height of
the main residence. Staff notes that in the elevation drawings included as Attachment E, the
garage presents a vertical appearance, but in the renderings included as Attachment D, it does not.
The Commission should consider whether the height of the garage should be reduced to be more
consistent with the Residential Design Guidelines.
Building & Roof Form: Residential Design Guidelines 8.1 through 8.3 state that "Shallow to
moderately pitched roofs are appropriate on one-story buildings. More steeply pitched roof with
low plate lines can be used on two-story buildings." The Guidelines emphasize using
restraint and simplicity in building forms, which should not be complicated, and roof lines,
which should avoid complex forms.
The proposed design includes a single story residence with an attached garage. The gable and
hipped roofs have varied roof pitches, with two rooflines visible from the street. The proposed
garage has a steep open-gable roof with a steep pitch of 12:193/16 with flared eaves, which gives
the house a story-book cottage appearance. In staffs opinion, the roof design is simple and
complements the building style and neighborhood context.

96

DS 16-397 (Carr)
November 9, 2016
Staff Report
Page 5

Site Coverage: The project site is vacant and contains no site coverage. The applicant is proposing
add 268 square feet of site coverage, including a driveway and small landing areas at each exterior
door. The allowed site coverage for this site is 396 square feet, and therefore the proposal is in
compliance.
Cut and Fill Grading: The applicant is proposing a total of 73 cubic yards of cut and 28 cubic yards
of fill as part of the project. A condition has been drafted requiring the applicant submit a grading
plan for staffs review prior to the issuance of a building permit, which should also include the
proposed number of truck haul routes during the construction process.
Public ROW: The unimproved portion of the City Right-of-Way (ROW) between the front property
line and edge of paving includes an existing brick retaining wall. The applicant is proposing to
maintain this retaining wall, and therefore staff has included a condition of approval that the
applicant obtain a permanent encroachment permit or remove the wall.
Environmental Review: The proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements,
pursuant to Section 15303 (Class 3) New Construction or Conversion of Small Units. The project
includes the construction of one single-family residence in a residential zone, and therefore
qualifies for a Class 3 exemption. The proposed residence does not present any unusual
circumstances that would result in a potentially significant environmental impact.
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A Site Photographs

Attachment B Findings for Concept Acceptance
Attachment C Draft Recommendations/Conditions
Attachment D Renderings
Attachment E Project Plans

97

Attachment A Site Photographs

Existing conditions

98

Adjacent neighbor to the North

Adjacent neighbor to the South

99

Attachment B Findings for Concept Acceptance

DS 16-397 (Carr)
November 9, 2016
Concept Findings
Page 1

FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR CONCEPT DESIGN STUDY ACCEPTANCE (CMC 17.64.8 and LUP Policy
P1-45)
For each of the required design study findings listed below, staff has indicated whether the
submitted plans support adoption of the findings. For all findings checked "no" the staff report
discusses the issues to facilitate the Planning Commission decision-making. Findings checked
"yes" may or may not be discussed in the report depending on the issues.
Municipal Code Finding

YES

1. The project conforms with all zoning standards applicable to the site, or has
received appropriate use permits and/or variances consistent with the zoning
ordinance.

NO

2. The project is consistent with the Citys design objectives for protection and

enhancement of the urbanized forest, open space resources and site design. The
projects use of open space, topography, access, trees and vegetation will maintain
or establish a continuity of design both on the site and in the public right of way that
is characteristic of the neighborhood.
3. The project avoids complexity using simple/modest building forms, a simple roof
plan with a limited number of roof planes and a restrained employment of offsets
and appendages that are consistent with neighborhood character, yet will not be
viewed as repetitive or monotonous within the neighborhood context.

4. The project is adapted to human scale in the height of its roof, plate lines, eave
lines, building forms, and in the size of windows doors and entryways. The
development is similar in size, scale, and form to buildings on the immediate block
and neighborhood. Its height is compatible with its site and surrounding
development and will not present excess mass or bulk to the public or to adjoining
properties. Mass of the building relates to the context of other homes in the
vicinity.

5. The project is consistent with the Citys objectives for public and private views
and will retain a reasonable amount of solar access for neighboring sites. Through
the placement, location and size of windows, doors and balconies the design
respects the rights to reasonable privacy on adjoining sites.

6. The design concept is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies related to
residential design in the general plan.

7. The development does not require removal of any significant trees unless
necessary to provide a viable economic use of the property or protect public health
and safety. All buildings are setback a minimum of 6 feet from significant trees.

8. The proposed architectural style and detailing are simple and restrained in
character, consistent and well integrated throughout the building and

100

DS 16-397 (Carr)
November 9, 2016
Concept Findings
Page 2

complementary to the neighborhood without appearing monotonous or repetitive

in context with designs on nearby sites.
9. The proposed exterior materials and their application rely on natural materials
and the overall design will add to the variety and diversity along the streetscape.

10. Design elements such as stonework, skylights, windows, doors, chimneys and
garages are consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines and will complement the
character of the structure and the neighborhood.

11. Proposed landscaping, paving treatments, fences and walls are carefully
designed to complement the urbanized forest, the approved site design, adjacent
sites, and the public right of way. The design will reinforce a sense of visual
continuity along the street.

12. Any deviations from the Design Guidelines are considered minor and reasonably
relate to good design principles and specific site conditions.
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS (CMC 17.64.B.1):
1. Local Coastal Program Consistency: The project conforms with the certified Local
Coastal Program of the City of Carmel-by-the Sea.

2. Public access policy consistency: The project is not located between the first
public road and the sea, and therefore, no review is required for potential public
access.

101

Attachment C Recommendations/Draft Conditions

DS 16-397 (Carr)
November 9, 2016
Recommendations/Draft Conditions
Page 1

Recommendations/Draft Conditions
No.
1.

2.

The applicant shall apply for and obtain an encroachment permit for the existing
retaining wall located in the City Right of Way prior to the issuance of a building
permit. If an encroachment permit is not obtained, the wall shall be removed as
part of the building permit.
The applicant submit a grading plan for staffs review prior to the issuance of a
building permit that includes the proposed number of truck haul routes during
the construction process.

102

103

104

WINDOW SCHEDULE

PROJECT INFORMATION

Symbol

Type

Fixed

Fixed

Telephone: 9161716 - 5670

DESIGNER:

16.02

Torres Street . Camrel-by-the-Sea, Cailtlmia

Noel and Andi Carr

POBox 299
Pebble Beach, California 93953

PROPERTY OWNERS:

DOOR SCHEDULE

BOLTON DESIGN GROUP. INC.

P.O. Box 5488
Car111111, California 93921

Unit Dlmenolons
Width & Height

Materll

Flnilh

Glazing

Quantity

1'-4"XZ-2"wl
2.75" Drop

Wood

Stain

LowE

1'-0"X1'-41''

Wood

Stain

LowE

Remarks

Tones Street, Camrel-~4he-Sea. Celi!omia

Symbol

Type

Garage

EniiY

Recessed

New One Slo<y Single Family Dwelling

Treck T'Ml Residential De$1gn Study Application lor Conoept Review

SITE ADDRESS:

DESIGN

16.02

Thickne

Material

Finllh

F"'me

Rl>morb

2114"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Garage

21M"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Custom Entry

TU: tAU ltiU

1-

~"

....

IUSI:IIOa ' l

Segmented Head

lOOII

10

TorresStteat
Carmelby-the-Sea
California 93921
010-103-012-000

ZONING:

R-1

PROJECT DATA:
4,000.00 SQ. FT.

LOT SIZE:
EXISTING SITE COVERAGE:

831 659 6200

casement

1'-6" X3'-41''

Wood

Stain

LowE

Pair French

Pair 2'-6" X 6'-8"

21/4"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Exterior

Fixed

2'-0" X3'-6"

Wood

Stain

tow E

..

Pair French

Pair 2'-6" X 6'-8"

21/4"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Exterior

Casement

1'-4" X2'-2"

Wood

Stain

LowE

10

Pair French

Pair 2'-6" X 8'-8"

21/4"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Exterior

Fixed

2'-S"XT..fl'

Wood

Stain

LowE

"'

Pair French

Pair 2'-6" X6'-8"

21/4"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Exterior

Casement

5'-0" X4'.-t"

Wood

Stain

lowE

Single French

3'-0"XG'-41''

21/4"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Exterior

Casement

2'-fl' X4'-4"

Wood

Stain

LowE

Panel

2'-8" XG'-41''

1 314"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Interior

casement

4'-9" X7'-0"

Wood

Stain

lowE

Panel

2'-8"X6'-8"

1314'

Wood

Stain

Wood

Interior

French Casement

5'-fl' X5'-4"

Wood

Stain

LowE

'
10

Panel

2'-TX6'-6"

1314"

Wood

Stain

Wood

krterior

11

Panel

3'..fl'X6'-8"

1 3/4"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Interior

12

PalrBi-Fold

2><2'-4" X6'-8"

1314"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Interior

13

Panel

2'-8" X6'-8"

131<1"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Interior

14

Panel

2'-8"X6'-8'

1314"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Interior

15

Panel

2'-8"X6'-8"

1314"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Interior

16

Panel

2'-8"X6'-41''

1 314'

Wood

Slain

Wood

lntenor

17

Pocket - Panel

3'-0" X6'-8"

1 3/4"

Wood

Stain

Wood

Interior

Torres Street

1,795 SQ. FT.

PROPOSED PERMEABLE SITE COVERAGE:

267.69 SQ. FT.

OSQ. FT.

PROPOSED IMPERMEABLE SITE COVERAGE :

1,937.31 SQ. FT.

PROPOSED OPEN SPACE:

NOT TO EXCEED 16'-0"

(NOT TO EXCEED 15"-0"WITHIN 16' OF REAR SETBACK)

Torres Street

PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL:

(Ref. Preliminary Site Assessment by City ol Cannel-bytheSea)

California
93921

~Significant - Tree #4, 1/;J

1 Moderately Significant- Tree #13
Not-Significant - Trees 115, #e, #9, and #12

SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS:

1,595 SQ. FT.

Main Residence:

200 SQ. FT.

Garages:

_G17 f

Central Coost Engineer, Inc.

21 West Alisal Street, Ste 119
Solinos, CA 93901
Telephone:
Facsimile:

010-103-012-000

DATE:

16 SEPT 2016

REVISIONS:

Marina

CONSULTANTS
Structural and Civil
Consultant:

APN:

VICINITY MAP

73 cu . yd. Cut 128 cu. yd. Fill

See Civil Sheet C-0.1

PROPOSED GRADING ESTIMATE:

New Single
Family Dwelling
5 NE of 4th Avenue
Carmel-by-the-Sea

0 SO. FT.

PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE (House Footprint- 1,800 ~.ft. Allowable):

PROPOSED HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE:

I N C .

MAP'

#"0110

5 NE of 4th Avenue

APN:

G R 0 U P
,....

w/5.5" Drop

Telephone: 6311659-6200
Facsimile: 6311659-0110
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Unit Dfm ensions

Width & Height
7'-S"XT.JJ'
Segmented Head
w/1'-1 1/2' Drop
3'-2 31<1" X6'-41''

BOLTON

LOCATION MAP

Salinas

831 / 757-5554
831 / 757-2226

ONE-STORY HOUSE

LOT8

11

--~=-

~~rd--

CONCRETE RETAINING / FOUNDAnON WALL

ONE-STORY GUEST HOUSE

Carmel
Highlands

Carm~l

,' 1'l.

Valley

DRAWING SHEET INDEX

A-0.1

TITLE SHEET I PROJECT DATA/ SCHEDULES/ SITE PLAN

A-1 .0

ROOF PLAN I FLOOR PLAN

A-2.1

ELEVATIONS

A-2.2

ELEVATIONS

C-0.1

CIVIL NOTES

TITLE SHEET I
PROJECT DATA/
SCHEDULES/
SITE PLAN
SCALE:

C-1.0

GRADING I DRAINAGE I EROSION CONTROL PLAN

NI A

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:
JOB NO.:

16.02

SHEET NO.:

A- 0.1

KEY
~ 2 Significant Trees to be Removed
#4 -6" Oak
#6 -15" Oak
ONE-STORY HOUSE

SCT MAG. NAIL A:

I
STEf t WASHER STAMF'0
"CtN!R AL COAST SVRViYORS" IN A. C. PAVl:. MLN r
[L[V.~J75 . 0C' (APPRO~ .

~ A \Of ~ )

LOT 12

4 Insignificant Trees to be Removed

#5 -5"0ak
#8 -5" Oak
#12- 2"0ak

SCALE: 118" = 1'-0"

l6'

On not scale drawings. Verify dimer\.fiions

meas11n.:mmts and dfrtli at building or site.
Repon ermrs. and ques~ions to BOG, INC.

1 Moderately Significant Tree to be Removed

#13 -10" Oak

#9 -5" Oak

SITE PLAN

RECEIVED

SEP 21 2016
CityofC

Plannin annel-by-the-Sea
g & Building Dept.

The usc of these plans and spcciricntion.." is

~trie1cd to the original site fot which
tbey were !lft'llln:d.
All drawinp and written material appearing
here in conttitutc the urigiul and unpublished
work of BDG, INC. and tht samo may 001 be
duplicated. used or disdosed wilbout wriucn
eoMettt of BDG. INC.

105

@ BOLTON DESIGN GROUr, INC.

B 0

L T 0 N

DESIGN

G R 0 U P

1 191\,12

N C .

+19;'\ :12

831 659 6200

Sj:12

Torres Street
+sj12

9l: 12

....._

New Single
Family Dwelling

--.

7 12

9l: 12

--.

Torres Street
Between 3rd and 4th
Carmel-by-the-Sea
California
93921

10j12

10 i 12

rj - 12

7i 12

7 12

9'-8 1/8"

20'-0"

(-

~-

(
--------- /

---L

---

/
9

1'-6"

C\1

\
/

---

1/

(j7)

~ \

I
\

OM

iO
-------

""'--

FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: I I 4"

= 1'- 0"

3'-0"

9c.,

~ ----

t-.1

.-u1

r--..

(
~

(F)

---/v
Co

~6--

BEDROOM NO.2
+379.5'

D/

i;

fL1Jf i>
c

BEDROOM NO. 1
+379.5'

~ ~

<?
0>
T"""

---

/
/~

-----

+379.5'

[~tCH~

12'-10 1/2"

q>
~

(')
~

.." t---

rll

It

lh

._
"11

"'"
C\1

MASTER BEDROOM

ROOF PLAN/
FLOOR PLAN

+379.5'

SCALE:

t
v

-- ------I

NIA

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

//

MASTER
1
CLOSET

JOB NO.:

16.02

SHEET NO.:

A-1.0

b
..0>'

::u
-i

24'-7 7/8"

------7 ~

..-

+379.5'

14'-2 1/4"

T"""

(')

,_______

t'-\

ro

D/

BATHROOM
N0.2r--

~1:1 ~

VQ)

GREAT ROOM

0 [>(

~~@

_L

16'-1 1 1/2"

LAUNDRY

(o'

"':;z:"
/9

..-I

/{Q ~
\

+379 .5'

~o@

'"'~

@~

- -----------

......._______

"'

I~

ENTRY

~~~

""

VV

-11 112..

'""'--

16 SEPT 2016

T"""

----

9b @(](

28'-1 1 7/8"

23'-4"

DATE:

1'-0"

15'-0"

/'/

010-103-012-000

REVISIO=NS.,__:_ _ _ __

ROOF PLAN
SCALE: I / 4"

APN:

\
~

__/

13'-8 1/2"

/
14'-7 3/8"

----------------

c.,

,_
3'-0"

Do not scale drawiogs. Verify dimensions,

mea:surements and data at building or site.
Report enors and questions 10 BDG, JNC
The use of these plans and specifications is
restricted to the original site for which
they were prcplUed.
All drawings and written material appearing
here in constitute the original and unpublished
work of BOO, INC. and the: same may not be
duplicated, used or di~losed witbont wriueo
consent of BDG, INC.

BOLTON DESIGN GROUP,

106INC.

B 0 L T 0 N

DESIGN
G R 0

U P

I N C .
831 659 6200

Torres Street
New Single
Family Dwelling

+396 .5'
GARAGE RIDGE

12

19;\1,

A-~-394.5'
-~RIDGE

Torres Street
Between 3rd and 4th
Carmel-by-the-Sea
California
93921

+J8s.2s _____d._
GARAGE PLATE

+ 379.5'
NATURAL GRADE*
.... 379.0'
GARAGE LEVEL

FINISH FLOOR

::iJ_[==ll_C==lL~~~~~~~========:::=:======i===L-~T~:~!J~-~~vEL

APN:

010-103-012-000

DATE:

16 SEPT 2016

FINISH FLOOR

REVISIONS:

+ 377 .25'
NATURAL GRADE

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST

SCALE: 1 / 4"

+ 396.5'
GARAGE RIDGE

1'-0"

yrlr.

+395.5'
KITCHEN I LIVING RIDGE

394.s_____d._
RIDGE

+ 394.5'
RIDGE

ELEVATIONS
SCALE:

+389.25' ;

GARAGE PLATE

+ 367.5'
PLATE

379.5'
MAIN LEVEL
+

A+3B7.5'
YPLATE

CHECKED BY:
JOB NO.:

16.02

SHEET NO.:

A- 2.1

J79.~'

AMAIN LEVEL

FINISH FLOOR

GARAGE LEVEL
FINISH FLOOR ~ -

NIA

DRAWN BY:

_ _ _ _ _L

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ j

+377 .25;--T
NATURAL GRADE

FINISH FLOOR/

NATURAL GRADE

Do not scalr drnwings. Verify dimensions,

measurements and data. at building or soite.
Report errors and questions to BOG, INC.
The use of these plans and specificatiocs is
restricted to the original site for which
they were prepared.
All drawings and written material appc:aring

here in con:stitute the original and Wlpublisht::d

GD

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH

SCALE: 1/4"

1'-0"

work of BOG, fNC. and the same may not be

duplicated, used or disclosed without written
consc:nt of BOO. INC.

107

BOLTON DESIGN GROUP, INC.

B 0

L T 0 N

DESIG N

G R 0 U P
l N C _

831 659 6200

Torres Street
New Single
Family Dwelling
A_+39B.5'

GARAG E RIDGE

Torres Street
Between 3rd and 4th
Carmel-by-the-Sea
California
93921

395.S*
KITCHEN I LIVINGRIDGE
+ 394.5'
PLATE

12

+368.25'

7~

GARAGE PLATE

+387.5

+387.5'A
PLATET

PLATE

010-103-012-000

DATE:

16 SEPT 2016

REVISIONS:

+379.5'
MAIN LEVEL

ED

APN:

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST

SCALE: 1 14"- 1'-0"

+396.5'
GARAGE RIDGE

-395.5' *

ELEVATIONS

KITCHEN I LIVING RIDGE

+394.5'
RIDGE

SCALE:

IA

DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:

+360.25'

+387.5'_~
PLATET

GARAGE PLATE

m m

+Je1 .25' A
NATURAL GRACE

y----

+379.5'+
MAIN LEVEL
FINISH FLOOR

t - - F- -

:- -

t- -

fJJ

ffi ffi

ffiDO

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH

16.02

SHEET NO.:

A- 2.2

@
A

~~~~~L GRADE

~ ~;:~E LEVEL
FINISH FLOOR

SCALE: I I 4" - I'- 0"

JOB NO. :

Do not scale drawings. VerifY dimensions,

measurements and data at building or site.
Report errors and questions to BDG, INC.

The use of these plans and specifications is

restricted to the original site for wbic:h
they were prt:pared.
All drawings and writteo material appearing
here in constitute the original and tmpublishcd
work of BOG, INC. and the sam(; may not be
duplicated, used or disclosed without u:ritten
consent of BOG, INC.

108

IlOLTON DESIGN GROUP. INC.

B 0 L T 0 N

NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELING

DESI GN
G R 0

U P

I N C .

GENERAL NOTES
831 659 6200

GENEJW. NQTES

GRAQING ANp QRAINAGE NQIES

1.1 .0 All WORK SHALL CONFORW TO THE CAUFORNIA IIUIUJING COO, lATEST RfVISION, THE CITY Of CARIIEl STAN!WlllS AND SPECIFICAllOMS, THE STAlE DEPARl\100 a' 1RANSI'ORI'AllON, "CA!JRANS
STANDARD PlANS & SPECIFICATIONS, 2010 E!li110N, THESE PlANS, AND THE SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY: GRICE ENGINEERING INC. REPORT NO.: ~ DATBJ: !AAJlCH XX 201 X
RESPECTMlY. IT SHAll BE THE COtflRACTORS RESPONSIBIL11Y TO OBTAIN AND IIIPLEiofENT All GEOTECHNICAl. REQUIRENENTS FROM THE REPORT. THIS REPORT SHAll BE CONSIDERED TO BE
INCOOPORATBJ AS PART Of THE CON5TRUCTION IJOCUijENTS. WHERE THE GEOlECHNICA!. REPORT RECOMIIENDATIONS AND REQUIREIIENTS CONAJCTS W1lH OTHER STANDAROS, THE GEOTECHNICAl.
REPORT SHALL GOVtRN PI!O'v'OOl THE RECOiflfENDAllON/REQUIREifENT IS MORE CONSOOATM. All STANDARDS Stwl. BE PURCHASED BY THE CONJR.ICTOR FROM THE STAlE ANO THE CITY.

2.1 .0 All UNSlAT.IIllE SOil IIA~ ASI'fW.T, CQNCREJ[, RIJEaSii AND DEBRIS R51Jl11NG FROM GRADING OPERATIONS SHA1.L BE REIKMD FROM THE JO!J SllE, 1RANSI'ORI'D TO A
SUITA!ll LOCAliON, AND OISPOSm or IN ,!CCORDANCE 1I!Tii APPLICABl REGULATIONS AND THESE CONSTRUCTKJN DOCUMENTS.

1.1.1

or

NO CONSTRUCllON SHAll COMMENCE WITHOUT PLANS APPROW BY THE CITY

CARMEl ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ANY CONSTRUCTION DONE WITHOUT APPR(MJ) PlANS OR PRIOR NOTlfi<:ATION
TO THE CITY ENGINEER WI.!. BE RE.{CTBl AND lfAY BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISX.

1.1.2 A PERMIT SHAll 8 OBTAINED mOM CITY OF CARMEl DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS AND CALTRANS FOR WORK TO BE DONE IN THE CITY STREET OR STAlE RIGI!f'-QHIAY.
1.1.3 THE CONTRACTOR SHAll BE RESPONSIBl FOR WORK AND PERMITS IN CONNEC!IlN W1lH THE REIIOVAL
1H

or EXCESS EAR1ll

MA1ERIAL5 AND WASTE.

or

1.1 .5 IIUD, SILT, SAND, GRAVEL OR ANY KIND OF DIRT DEI.MRED TO THE STREET BY llllJCKS GETTING IN AND OUT OF THE JOB SHAI.l BE REIIOVED BY THE COtflRACTOR.

1.1.7 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBl FOR THE PROTECTION OR PROPER RESET11NG OF All EXISTING MONUMENTS AND OTHER SUIMY MARKERS. ANY SUR'IEY MONUMENTS OESTROYIl BY THE
CONTRACTOR SHAll BE REPlACED IN ACCORDANCE W1lH THE STATE lAND SUIMYOR'S ACT AT THE CONTRfaOR'S EXPENSE.
1.1 .8 THE LOCAliONS OF EXISTING UTIUllES AND UNDERGROUND PIPELNES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE COtflRACTOR SHALL llffiRMINE THE EXACT LOCATION AND DEPTH OF All
EXISTING unUliES AND UNDERGROUND PIPEUNES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR IGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBl FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHIC!i MIGI!I' BE OCCASIONED BY
FAilURE TO EXACTlY LOCATE EXISTING ununES. PRESEIM AND PROTECT Alf'f AND ALL UN!lERGilO\mD UTIUTIES AND PIPElNES. THE CONTRACTOR SHAI.L Colli U.S.A. (UNDERGROUND SEJMC
ALEI!1) AT 811 TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVAliON.

1.1.9 All EXISTING IIIPR<MJ.IENTS (CURB, GUTTER, SOVt.IU<, CROSS-GUTTER, FENCING, ETC.) THAT ARE REifO'I[f), DAMAGED, OR UNDERCIJ[ SHAll BE REPAIRED OR REPIJI:D AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY
ENGINEER.

or CONSlRUCTlON

IN N:CORDANCE W1lH TilE STATE

or CAUFORN~ MfoHJAl. OF UNifORif TRAFFIC CONTROL DE\ICES (MUTCO)

LATEST EDIIIQN.

1.1.11 THE CITY INSPECTOR ACTING ON BOWF OF THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS MAY REQUIRE REVISIONS IN THE PLANS TO SOLVE UNFORESEEN PROill11S THAT MAY ARISE IN TilE FIElD. All
REVI~ONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL Of THE ENGINEER or RECORD AND THE OWNER.
1.1.12 CENTRAl. COAST ENGINEERS, INC. SHAI.l NOT BE RESPON~Bl OR I.J.o\lll FOR UNAUTHORIZED CHANCES TO, OR USES Of, THESE PLANS. All CHANGES TO TilES PLANS MUST BE APPROVED IN
WRfiiNC BY CENTRAL COAST ENGINEERS, INC.
1.1.13 IF A PROIIlJM SHOUUD ARISE DURING THE COURSE Of CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE RESPONSIBIL11Y
TO ANY FURTHER WORK.

New Single
Family Dwelling

THE CONTR!ClOR SHALL SUBMIT COMPACTION REPORTS PREPARED BY AN APPRiN0 TESTING H;ENCY FOR All FILLS, TO THE COUNTY AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.

2.1.4 COIIPACTION TESTS SHALL BE MADE ON SUB-GRADE MATERIAL. FILL AND COMPACTBJIIATERIAL UNDER All STRUCTURES AND PAVENENT, AND MAlERIAL AS SPEOAED BY THE
ENGINEER
RECORD OR THE COUNTY. SAID TESTS SHAI.L BE IIADE PRIOR TO THE PLACING Of TilE NEXT MATERIAL. CON1RICTOR Stwl. OBTAIN AND WINf.IIN THE PROPER
IIOOTURE CONDI110N1NG a' SOILS UNDER CONCRETE SIA!lS PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IMMEDIAlELY PRIOR TO VAPOR RETARDING IIEII!lllANE AND CONCRETE PLACEIIENT.

or

2.1 .5 COIIPACTION TESTS SHALL BE THE R5PONSIBIL11Y

or THE CONTRACTOR THE NUMBER AND

Torres Street
5 NE of 4th A venue
Carmel-by-the-Sea
California
93921

lOCATION OF REQUIRED TESTS SHAI.L BE OEIIRM!NED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL

ENGINEER.
2.1.6 BENCijiNG IS REQUIRED ON ALL SLOPES GREAT THAN 5:1, BENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2-FID MINIMUM AND HOOT 1r001CA1. MINIMUM, A KEYED TOE BENCH OF 2-FE1 WIDE BY
1-FDOT VERTICAl SHAll BE IJSEO.

1.1 .6 THESE PLANS DO NOT AUTHORIZE SITE DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE UIIITS OF GRADING SHOWN.

1.1.10 PRlMD APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL lUliNG COURSE

2.1 .2 THE SOILS ENGINEER SHAll INSPECT AND TEST All GRADING IN THE AElO AND SHAll DEClARE JW.T All EARI!iWORK WAS PROPER!.Y DONE AND IN CONFORMANCE 1I!Tii All
REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED HEREW1TH.
2.U

THE CONTRACTOR Stwl. EMPLOY All lABOR, EQUIPMENT AND METHODS REQUIRED TO PREVENT HIS OPERAllON FROM PflOIJUCING DUST IN ,o\UOUNTS llAIIAGING TO PROPERTY AND DOIIESTIC ANII.W.S
OR CAUS~N; A NIJISANC TO PERSONS OCCUPYING BUILDINGS IN THE VICINITY
THE JOilSilE THE CONTRACTOR SHAll II RESPONSIIIU FOR ANY llAIIGE CAUSED BY DUST RESULTING FROM HIS
OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR Stwl. ARRANGE FOR AGENCY WATER IF REQUIRED. DUST ABAIDAENT MEASURES SHAI.l 8 CONSISTENT 1I!Tii THE STANDARDS OF THE REGIONAL AIR QUAL11Y CONTROl
BOARD AND SHALL BE CONTINUED UNTIL RELEF IS GRANTBJ BY THE GRADING INSPECTOR.

Torres Street

or

2.1 .1 All F1llS USED TO SUPPORT 1IHE FOUNni.TIONS

ANY BUILDING OR SlR\JCTIJRE SHALL BE PlJC0 UNDER THE DIRECTION Of A GEOTECHHICA!. ENGMER OR THEJR DESIGAATBJ
REPRESENTA11VE, AND THE PLACEIIENT OF THE FILL SHAI.l BE INSPECTBJ BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR HIS QUAIUAED REPRESENTATM. A REPORT OF SATISFACTORY
PLACEMENT OF AU. ACCEPTA!li..E TO THE BIJILQ:NG OFFICIAL. SHAI.l BE SUBNITT0 TO THE ENGINEER Of RECORD.

or THE COtflRACTOR TO NOllfY THE COUNTY AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD INMED~lELY PRIOR

or

ANY PART OF THE PLAN AND SPECIACATIONS DR FINDS DISCREPANCIES IN OR OMISSIONS FROII THE DRAWINGS. HE SHALL SUBIIIT A
1.1.14 IF THE CONTRACTOR IS IN DOUBT AS TO THE MEANING
WRITTEN REQUEST FOR AN INTERPRETATKJN OR A CORRECllON THEREOF.
1.1.15 THE CONTRACTOR SHAI.L lfAINfAIN A CURRENT, COlU'\ill, ANO ACCURAT RECORD or All APPRiN0 CHANGES WHICH DEVIATE FROM THE CON5TR\.ICI10N AS PROPOSED IN THESE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRlMDING THE ENGINEER W1lH A BASIS FOR RECORD DRAWINGS. NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE 11!lliOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER, THE
ENGINEER OF RECORD, AND THE OWNER.

2.1.7 IN THE E.VENT JW.T THE CONTRACTOR OR THEJR SUBCONTRACTORS NOTICES IRREGUIARmES IN THE UN OR GRADE HE SHAI.L BRING IT TO THE IMMEO~TE ATTENTION Of THE
ENGINEER Of RECORD. IF HE FAILS TO DO SO, TH CONTRACTOR SHALL 8 RESPONS!!ll FOR RECONSlRIJCTION TO CORflECT SUCH ERROR.
2.1.8 FLOODING OR WATERJETING SHALL NOT BE USED FOR IIACKAU. COI.f'ACTION.
2.1.9 THE SLOPE GRADIENT AWAY FROM THE BIJILDING PAD SHAI.L BE TWO PERCENT (2:1:) OR MORE (IN PAVED AREAS) AND FIVE PERCENT (5X) OR MORE (~ UNPAVED AREAS) FOR A
MINIMUM DISTANCE OF TEN FEET (1D') PER C13C CODE.

2.1.10 ALL NON-PAVED FINISHED GIWl EllVATIONS SHALL BE A MINIMUM or ElGifl INCH (8") BElOW FINIStD FLOOR AND 2' llfl.<M FINISH FLOOR WHERE CONCRT IS
IMMEDIA!D.Y OUTSIDE THE BIJILDING (UNO), EXCEPT AT DOOR LANDINGS AND TRANSillONS TifERETO.
2.1.11 FOR ADOOION.\1. GRADING REQUIREMENTS SEE THE GEOTECHNICAl. REPORT PREPARED BY GRICE ENGINEERlrl. INC SEIMC REPORT NO. ~ AND CIW'TR 18
SECTION
THE 2013 CBC.

PROJECT:
APN:

CARR RESIDENCE
01Q-103-012-000

2.1.12 ALL UNSUITABl SOIL MATERIALS: ASI'fW.T, CONCRETE. RUBBISH AND DEBRIS RESULTING FROII GIWJING OPERATIONS SHAll BE ROOVED molt THE JOB SITE,
liRANSPORT0 TO A SUTT.IBI LOCATKJN, AND D!SPOSD OF IN ACCORDANCE 1lllli APPIJCAIIlJ REGULATIONS. THE SITE SHALL BE STRIPPED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1 10 2
INC!iES. All EXISTING FILL SOilS WHICH WERE NOT PROPERlY COMPACTBJ AND CERliFIED SHAI.l BE EXCAVATBJ AND STDCKPIL0 SO THAT THE NATM: SOIL CAN BE PROPERLY

AllORESS:

TORRES STREET 5 NE of 4th AVE.

Conr<!l-by-the-Soo, Corlfomio 93923

or

APN:

010-lO:I-012-000

DATE:

9-15-2016

PROJECT DATA

REVISIONS:

PREPARED.
2.1 .13 FOLLOWING STRIPPING, F1ll REMOVAL. liREE REMOVAL AND OEMOUTION ACTMTY AND PRIOR TO BACKFlWNG. THE EXPOSED SUBGRADE 11!Tli1N THE BLDG & EXTERIOR FLATWORK
AND PAVED AREAS SHAI.L BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH or AT LEAST B INCHES, WORKED UNIFORif, MOISTURE CONDmON AND RECOMPACT0 TO AT lAST 90% RElATM: COIIPACllON
FOR 5' BEYOND THE 111'00< UMITS.
2.1.14 ALL FILLS USED 1D SUPPORT THE FOUN~TIONS OF ANY BUILDING, FlATWORK OR PAVEMENTS SHAI.L BE PLACED IN B' UFTS AND COMPftCTEO TO 90X RElATM: COMPACTION AND
95X RElATM: COIIPACTION FOR PAVENENTS. A REPORT
SATISFACTORY PLACEIIENT
FlU. OOTH ACCIEPTA!ll TO THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGIIIEER AND TO THE BIJILDING Off1CIAL.
SHALL BE SUBMITTED.

or

or

2.1.15 ALL IMPORT FILL OR ENGINEERED F1ll (NATIVE) SHAI.L MEET THE CRITER~ Fll IMPORT FILL Pffi TABLE 5.4.1 OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.

1.1.16 CONSTRUCTION GRADE STAKES AND PROPERTY LOT UNES SHAI.L BE SET BY A l.KDISEO SUIMYOR IN THE STATE OF CAILFORN~
1.1.17 NEIIHER THE OWNER, NOR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD WILL ENFORCE SAITIY MEASURES OR REGUlATIONS AS THEY PERTAIN TO THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHAI.L DESIGN, CONSIR\JCT AND
lfAINTAIN All SAITIY IJEVICES, INCWOING SllRINC AND SHALL BE SOIILY RESPONSilll! FOR C!JIFORMING TO ALL lOCAL. STATE AND FEDERAL Sfff1Y AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS AND
REGULAliONS. THE APPROVAL
THESE PlANS SHAI.l NOT BE TAKEN AS CONCURRENCE BY THE COUNTY THAT THE CONTRACTORS OR THEJR AGENTS HAVE BEEN ABSOlVED TO ENFORCE APPL.ICABl
SoiFE1Y REGULATIONS.

CCE

or

CENTRAL COAST
ENGINEERS, INC.

1.1.18 THE USE OF PlANS BY ANY CONTRACTOR SHAI.L HOLD liRUE THAT THE CONTRACTOR AGREES JW.T HE SHALL ASSUME SOl AND COMPiill R5PONS1BIL11Y FOR JO!l SITE CONiliTIONS DURING THE
COURSE OF CONSTRUCllON Of THE PROJECT, INCLUDING Sfff1Y or ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHAI.l APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE U.~ITEO TO NORioW. WORKING
HOURS, JW.T THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INOEII~FY AND H(XJ) THE OWNER AND CENTRAL COAST ENGINEERS, INC. HARMLESS mDM ANY AND All UABIUTY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION
Yl11li THE PrnFORIIAin
W01l1< ON THIS PROJECT.

STRUCTURAL

or

DESIGN

1.1.19 All WORK SHAI.L CONFORM Yl11li THE AIIERICANS W1lH DISIBIUTIES N:r ACCESS181L11Y GUIOELNES.

P.O.
BD X
2503
SALINAS,CA 93902
p 831 .7 57.5554
F 831 .757.2226

oocuwm

1.1.20 IN THE E.VENT CDNSlRIJCllON STAKING BASED ON THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS OR OTHER
IS ACCOMPUSHED BY OTHER THAN CENTRAl. COAST ENGINEERS, INC. OR THEJR SUBCONSUlTANT,
OWNER AND CONTRACTOR AGREE TO HOLD CENTRAL COAST ENGINEERS, INC. HARMLESS AND RELEASE All I.J.o\lliUTY ARISING FROM THE USE OF SAID PLANS, DRAWINGS OR OTHE!l DOCUMENTS.
l!NQERGROUNP

ESTIMATED QUANTITIES

!Wl!DES

1.2.0 NO GUARANTU IS INTENOEO JW.T UtRGRRUNO OllSTIRUC110NS NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS MAY BE ENCOUNTEREO. TH0S SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE BEST INFORMAliON AVAII.Aill.E AND THE
CONliRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT THE COUNTY AND THE ENGINEER ASSUME NO RESPONSIBIUTY FOR ANY OBSIRUCTIONS EITHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHAI.l
COOPERATE 1I!Tii ALL unLJ1Y COMPANIES WORKING 111lliiN THE UMITS OF THIS PROJECT.

AREA OF DISTURBED = 1,990 SF/0.046 ACRE

CUT
= 73 CY
FILL
= 28 CY
NET EXPORT
= 45 CY

1.2.1 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BEGIN EXCAVAliON UNTIL ALL EXISTING UliUliES HAVE BEEN MARKED IN THE F1ElD BY THE APPL.K:ABl ENTITY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT PARliCUIAR unUTY. THE
CONTRACTOR SHAI.l NOllfY EACH APPUCAIIU ENTITY AT lAST 24 HOURS BEFORE STARliNG WORK.
1.2.2 UNOE:R<:ROtmD SBMCE ALERT: CAll 811 411 HOURS PR10R TO EXCAVATION.

CIDIL NOTES

QUANTITIES ESTIMATED IN THE SUBJECT AREA FOR

PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. ALL CONTRACTORS
BIDDING THE PROJECT SHALL MAKE THEIR OWN
DETERMINATION OF THE OUANITIES.

1.2.3 CONfRACTOR SHAI.l UNCOVER EXISTING MIED ununES 1I!Tii unUTY OWNrn(S) TO VERIFY LOCAnONS AND EllVAliONS OF unUTlES. BURIED UliUTIES INCWOE BUT ARE NOT lJMITED TO WATER
lfAINS AND lATERAL5, SEWER UNES, STORM OR.IJNS, GAS lfAIHS AND lATERAL5, EJ.CTRICA!. DISTRI~ UNES AND TElEPHONE UNES. unUliES CONFUCTING WT1H THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCllON
SHAI.L BE AllORESSED IN ACCORDANCE 1I!Tii THE SPECIFICAllONS.

SCALE:

TYPICAL HATCHING (PLAN VIEW)

ABBREVIATIONS
f
BC

BVCS
BVCE
BN
C/CONC
Cl
Dl

DS
EC

EP
EVCS
EX

rc
FEC

F1'
FG

Ill
F1L

rs

ASPHALTIC CONCRffi
BEGIN CURVAliURE
BEGIN VERTICAL CURVAliURE STATION
BEGIN VERTICAL CURVAliURE ELEVATION
BENCHMARK
CONCRffi
CENTERUNE
DRAIN INLET
OOWNSPOUIT
END CURVAliURE
EDGE OF PAVEUENT
END 'IERTICAI. CURVAliURE STATION
EXISliNG
RNISHED CONCREIE
FlARED END SECTION
FINISHED FlLOOR
FINISHED GRADE
FIRE HYDRANT
FlLOW UNE
FINISHED SURFACE

GR
IE
LG
NH

00
OG

Pl
P'/1
ROW

s
so
ss

SPR
TC

roc

UP

VG

GUTTER

WI

GB

GRADE BREAIK

WCR

GRAliE
ltMRT EI..EVAliON
UP OF GUTTER
MANHOLE
OUTSIDE DLIIMETR
ORIGINAL GROUND
PAVEUENT
PROPR1Y UNE
POII'IT OF VERTICAL
INTERSECTION
RIGHT -OF-'NAY
SLOPE
STORM OP.AJN
SANITARY SEWER
SPRINKLER
TOP OF CURB
TOP a' CONCREIE
lffiLITY POLE
VAILLEY GUTTER
WATER METER
WATER YAILVE
WHEaGH.AJR RAMP

D
D

PROPOSED PORTlAND
CEMENT CONCRffi

PROPOSED liJRF/
LANDSCAPE AREA

LEGEND

SHEET INDEX

-- -

--- -

CENTERUNE

-----E:-----

NEW EI.CTRICAL UNE

---T----T---

NEW TlliPHONE UNE

- -- > - - - > - --

FlLOW UNE

C0.1

C1.0
---- -

PROPOSED ASP!W.T PAVENENT

- - - - EXISTING PROPERTY UNE

- - PROPOSED CATCH UNE/HINGE UNE

as shown

DRAWN IV:

CML NOTES
GRADING, ORAIKAGE & EROSION COHliROl PLAN

CH ECKED BY:

lOll NO.:

CCE 16-056

SHEET NO.:

CO.l

- - -- -23 - - -- - PROPOSED CONTOUR

CLEAN OUT
-

TYPICAL HATCHING (SECTION)

~
tffiillffimij
W<<t~

ASPHALT CONCRETE
COMPACTED
BACKFILL/SUBGRADE
UNDISTURBED EARTH

D
D

2344 -

EXISliNG COI'ITOUR

- - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED EGDE OF ROoiD SURFACE

CATCH BASIN

Do not scale d raw i n~s. Verify dimc:mions.

mcasurementsan ddata ru building m sltc _ Re pc~n

AGGREGATE BASE

- - - - - W 6 - - - - - NEW WATERUNE &: SIZE

CONCRETE

SAND

errors and questions to BOG.

- - - - 5 5 6 - - - - NEW SANITARY SEWER PIPELINE &: SIZE

---~so 1 B----

NEW STORM DRAIN PIPEUNE &: SIZE

- - - GAS - - GAS - - NEW GAS UNE

FG=105.00
TC=105.50

PROPOSED SPOT GRADE

I~

The useofthese plan<o and specitlcations is

restrictedtorhcoriginal site for whi ch
tt.ey werepreparcd

DETAA. NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER WHERE
DETAil CAN BE FOUND

All drawings and written material appearing here

in constitutetheongmal and unpuhltshedwork of
ODG , INC. and the same may not be duplicated ,
used or d isclosed without written consent of

BOG , INC

109

@ BOLTON DESIGN GROUP. INC

EROSION PROTECTION NOTES

CITY OF CARMEL NOTES

GRADING SHAll BEGIN WITHIN 30 DAYS OF 1/EGETATIDN REMOVAL OR THAT AREA SHAll BE PLANTED UNDER THE PROV1SIONS OF SECTION 16.08.340 TO CONTROL
EROSION. (MCC 16.08.30D C.1)
2.

NO VEGETATION REMOVAL OR GRADING Will BE AllOWED WHICH Will RESULT IN SILTAllON OF WATER COURSES OR UNCONTROLlABLE EROSION. (~CC 16.08.300 C.2)

3.

OUST FROU GRADING OPRA110NS MUST BE CONTROllED. THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR IIAY BE REQUIRED TO KEEP ADEQUATE EQUIPMENT ON THE GRADING SITI TO
PREVENT DUST PROBLEMS.

B. ALL IXSTURBED SURFACES SHAll BE PREPARED NND MAINTAINED TO CONTROL EROSION AND TO ESTNBUSH NATIVE OR NATURAUZED
VEGETATION GROWTH COUPATIBUE ~ITH THE MEA. THIS CONTROL SH.oiU CONSIST OF:
1. EFFECT TEMPORARY PLANllNG SUCH AS RYE GRASS, SOME OTHER FAST GERMINATION SEED, AND MULCHING WITH STRAW NNO/OR OTHER SLOPE
STNBIUZATION MATERIAL
2. PERMANENT PLANllNG Of NATIVE OR NATURALIZED DROUGHT RESISTANT SPECIES OF SHRUBS, TREES, OR OTHER VEGETATION, PURSUANT TO THE
COUNTY'S LANDSCAPE CRITERIA, WHEN THE P1JJECT IS COMPLETED.
3. MULCHING, FERllUZING, WATERING OR OTHER METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED TO ESTABUSH NEW VEGETAllON, ON SLOPES LESS THAN 20%, TOP SOIL
SHOUUO BE STOCKPILED AND RENPPUEO.

RUNOFF FRON ACTMTIES SUBJECT TO A DEIIELOP~ENT PERMIT SHAll BE PROPERLY CONTROllED TO PREVENT ERCSIOIJ. THE FOllOWING UEASL!lES StWl BE USED
FOR RUNOFF CONTROl AND StWl 8E ADEQUATE TO CONTROL RUNOFF FROM A TEN YEAR STORM:
A. ON SOILS HAV1NG HIGH PERMEABILITY (MORE THAN 2 INCHES/HOUR), All RUNOFF IN EXCESS Of PREDEVELOPMENT UEVELS SHAll BE RETNNED ON THE SITE.
THIS MAY BE ACCOMPUSHED THROUGH THE USE Of INFILTRATION BASINS, PERCOLAllON PITS OR TRENCHES, OR OTHER SUITNBLE MEANS. THIS REQUIREMENT
MAY 8E WNVED WHERE THE DIRECTOR OF BUII.lltiG INSPECTION l!'ON RECO~~ENOAllON OF THE HEALTH OEP~ENT DETERMINES THAT HIGH GROUNDWATER,
SLOPE STABILITY PROBLEMS, OR OTHER CONIJITIONS WOUUO INHIBIT OR BE AGGRAVATED BY ONSITE RETENTION, OR WHERE RETENTION Will PROV10E NO
BENEFITS FOR GROUND WATER RECHARGE OR EROSION CONTROL

6.

IT SHAll BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND THE PERMITEE TO ENSURE THAT EROSION ODES NOT OCCUR FROM AN ACTMTY DURING OR AFTER
PROJECT CONSTRUCllON. ADDITONAL MEASURES, BEYOND THOSE SPECIFIED, MAY BE REQUIRED AS DEEMED NECESSARY TO CONTROL ACCELERATED EROSION.
(UCC 16.12.10D)

7.

CONTRACTOR: --- CONSTRUCTION - ----- CARMEL, CA 93922

(831) StWl BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION ANO SEDEMENT CONTROL BMP INSTAL!AllON AND M.AJNTENANCE.

8. ON PROJECTS WHERE ONSITE PERCOlATION IS NOT FEASIBLE, All RUNOFF MUST BE DETAINED OR DISPRSD OllER NON-ERODIBLE VEGETATED SURFACES SO
THAT THE RUNOFF RATES ODES NOT EXCEED THE PREDEVELOPMENT UEVEL ONS/TE DETENTION ~AY BE REQUIRED WHERE EXCESSIVE RUNOFF RATE DOES NOT
EXCEED THE PREDEVELOP~ENT UEVEL ONSITE DETENTION MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE EXCESSIVE RUNOFF WOUlD CONTRIBUTE TO OOWNSTR~ EROSION OR
FLOODING. ANY POLICIES NND REGUIAllONS FOR ANY DRAINAGE ZONES WHERE THE P1JJECT IS LOCATED Will ALSO APPLY.
C. ANY CONCENTRATED RUNOff WHICH CANNOT BE EFFECTIVELY DETAINED OR DISPERSED WITHOUT CAUSING EROSION, SHALL BE CARRED IN NON-EROIXBLE
CHANNELS OR CONDUITS TO THE NEAREST DRAINAGE COURSE DESIGNATED FOR SUCH PURPOSE OR TO ONSITE PERCOlATION DEVICES. WHERE WATER WILL !
DISCHARGED TO NATURAL GROUND OR CHANNELS, APPROPR~TE ENERGY DISSIPATERS SHAll BE INSTAllED TO PREVENT EROSION AT THE POINT OF
DISCHARGE.

~.

lAND CLEARING SHAll 8E KEPT TO A MINIMLI<. VEGETAIDN R~OVAL SHALL BE UMITEO TO THAT AUOUNT NECESSARY FOR BUILDING ACCESS, Alll CONSTRUCTION AS
SHOWN ON THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PIAN. THE FOllOWING PROV1SIONS StWl APPLY:
A. NO LAND CLEARING SHAll TAKE PLACE PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE EROSION CONTROL PlAN. VEGETATION REMOVAL BETYIEEN OCTOBER 1~ AND APRIL 15
SHAll NO PRECEDE SUBSEQUENT GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIV1TIES BY UORE THAN 1~ DAYS. DURINC THIS PERIOD, EROSlON NND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES SHALL BE IN PlACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING OAY.

1.1

CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREUENTS OF THESE PLANS SHAll IN NO WAY REUEIIE THE CONTRACTOR FROM HIS RESPONSIBIUllES TO THIS
PROJECT
ADJACENT PROPERnES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHAll CONSIST OF, BUT NOT 8E UMITED TO, CONSTRUCTING SUCH FACJUllES
AND TAKING SUCH MEASURES AS ARE NECESSARY TO PREVENT, CONTROL NND ABATE WATER, UUO AND EROSION DAMAGE TO PUBUC AND PRIVATE
PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF THE PROJECT.

1.2

C0TY APPROVAL OF PlANS DOES NOT REUEVE THE DEVELOPER FROM RESPONSIBIUTY FOR THE CORRECTION OF ERROR AND OMISSON OISCOI/ERED
DURING CONSTRUCllON. UPON REQUEST, THE REQUIRED PlAN REV1SIONS SHAll BE PROMPllY SUBMITTEO TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR NPPROVAL.

831 659 6200

SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST ~ANACEMENT PRACnCES (BMPS) SHAll BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED TO PREVENT NNO/OR MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT
OF SOIL FROU THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. A STOR~ WATER POLLUllON PREVENTION PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS SITE, IT IS THE
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REV1EW, MNNTAIN, ANO IMPLEMENT THE REQUIR~ENTS OF THE PLAN.

Torres Street

1.4

CONSTRUCllON SITES SHAll BE M.AJNTAINED IN SUCH A CONDITION THAT WIND OR RUNOFF DOES NOT CAARY WASTES OR POLLUTNNTS OFF THE
sm: TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FACIUllES OR ADJIXNING PROPERTIES. DISCHARGES OTHER THNN STORMWATER (NON-STORUWATER DISCHARGES) ARE
PROHIBITED, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY NN INDMOUAL NPOES PERMIT OR THE STATEWIDE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORUWATER IXSCHAAGES
ASSOCL'.TED WITH CONSTRUCTION AC11V1TY. POTE~ POLLUTNNTS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT UMITEO TO: SOUD OR UQUID CHEMICAL SPILLS: WASTES
FROM PAINTS, STAINS, SEALANTS, SOLVENTS. DETERGENTS. GLUES. UME, PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, FERTIJZERS, WOOD PRESERVAllVES, NNO
ASBESTOS FEERS, PAit/1 FlAKES OR STUCCO FRAGMENTS; FUELS, OILS, LUBRICANTS, AND HYORAUUC, RliiL'.TOR OR BATTERY FLLIOS; CONCRETE
AND RElATED CUTTING OR CURING RESIDUES; FLOATNBLE WASTES; WASTES FROM ENGINE/EQUIPMENT STEAM CLEANING OR CHEMICAL DECREASING:
WASTES FROM STREET CLEANING; SUPER-CHLORINATED POTABLE WATER FROM UNE FLUSHING AND TESTING; AND RUNOFF FROM EQUIPMENT AND
VEHICLE WASHING. DURING CONSTRUCllON, DISPOSAL OF SUCH MATERW.S SHOUlD OCCUR IN A SPECIFlED AND CONTROllED TEMPORARY AREA
ON-SITE PHYSICAllY SEPARATED FROM POTENTlAL STORUWATER RUNOFF, WITH ULllMATE DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE NNO
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. AT THE END OF EACH DAY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY All CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS NNO WASTE MATERL'.LS SHAll BE
COLLECTED AND PROPERLY IXSPOSED IN TRASH OR RECYCLE BINS.

New Single
Family Dwelling

9.

ALL GRADING SHAll CONfORM TO THE CITY OF CARNEI. GRADNG OONANCE, EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE, AND CALIFORNL'. BUI.DING CODE.

10.

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBANCE, THE OWNER/NPPUCANT SHAll SCHEDULE A.~ INSPECTION WITH RMA-EN'IRONMENTAL SERV1CES TO
ENSURE All NECESSARY SEDIMENT COilTROLS ARE IN PlACE AND THE PROJECT IS COMPliANT WITH CITY OF CARMEl. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL
REGUlATIONS

11.

DURING CONSTRUCTION THE OWNER/NPPUCOO SHALL SCHEDULE AN INSPECllON 'MTH CITY OF CARNEL TO UPDATE COMPACTION TEST RECORDS, INSPECT
DRAINAGE DEV1CE INSTAllAllON, REV1EW THE M.AJNTENANCE ANO EFFECTIVENESS OF BMPs INSTALLED, AS WELL AS, TO VERIFY THAT POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN
ARE NOT DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE.

1.5

All CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL ARE 10 BE MADE AWAIRE OF THE REQUIRED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ANO
GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MEASURES FOR THE PROJECT sm: NNO ANY ASSOCL'.TED CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS. STAGING AIREAS SHAll BE SELECTED
BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH INCORPORATION OF THE NPPROPRL'.TE SUP'S.

12.

PRIOR TO ~NAL INSPECllON, THE OWNER/APPUCANT SHAll SCHEDULE NN INSPECllON WITH CITY OF CARMEL TO CONDUCT A nNAL GRADING INSPECllON,
COLLECT FINAL GEOTECHNICAL LETTER OF CONFORMANCE. ENSURE THAT All DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABAIJZEO AND THAT All TEMPORARY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES THAT AIRE NO LONGER NEEDED HAVE iaN REMOVED.

1.6

BMPS SHAll BE M.AJNTAINEO AT All TIMES. IN MJOillON, BMPS SH.oiU BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO PREDICTED STORM EVENTS AND FOLLOWING STORM
EIIENTS. SEE THE PROJECT STORM WATER POllUTION PREVENTION PlAN FOR BMP DETAILS.

1.7

SPECIFIC LCCAllONS OF BMP'S SUCH AS SILT FENCING, MATERL'.LS STORAGE AREA AND STABIUZED ROMJ CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE ADJUSTED TO
REFLECT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT & CONTRACTORS ~EANS AND METHODS'.

l.B

STRAW MULCH OR SOIL BINDER SHAll BE NPPUEO TO All INACllVE DISTURBED AREAS. STRAW MULCH StWl BE RE-APPLIED AS NEEDED TO

1.9

LINEAR SEDIMENT CONTROLS (SILT FENCING, FIBER ROLLS, ETC) SHAll BE DEPLOYED ON DISTURBED SLOPES (IF ANY). UNEAR SEDIMENT CONTROLS
Will ALSO BE USED AS A PERIMETER CONTROL TO CONTAIN SEDIMENT WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO DEPLOY PERIUffiR
CCNTROLS AT LOCATIONS WHERE SEDIMENT IS UNABLE TO LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE (SUCH AS llUS THAT SLOPE INWMD)

1.10

THE CONTRACTOR SHAll INSPECT All IMMEDL'.TE ACCESS ROADS DAILY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY SEDIMENT OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION
ACTMTY RELATED MATERL'.LS THAT ME D~TED ON THE ROADS BY VACUUMING OR SWEEPING ON A ONLY BASIS (WHEN NECESSARY) AND PRIOR
TO ANY RAIN EVENT.

~AINT.<JN

EFFECTIVENESS.

-~---4---

1.11

STOR~

A STABIUZEO CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT SHAll BE CONSTRUCTED IF EXISTING PAI/EMENTS DO NOT EXIST. ADDITIONAL ENTRANCES/EXITS SHAll
BE CONSTRUCTEC AS NEEDED. CONSTRUCllON AC11V1TY TRAFFlC TO AND FROM THE PROJECT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THESE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCES/EXITS.

LEGEND
PROPERTY UNE

SEDIMENT LOGS
LOCATIONEj

ONE-STORY HOUSE
LOT 12

PERMEABLE INlERLOCKING
PAVER

11111111111

SAND SET PERMEABLE

PAVERS

mmM

SAND SET PERMEABLE

LANDING

DRAIN INLETS OOWNGRADIENT OF DISTURBED SOIL AIREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED.

'11\1-8 .!:

WATER SHALL BE NPPUED TO DISTURBED AREAS AND STOCKPILES AS NECESSARY TO PREIIENT OR AllEV1ATE EROSIONS BY THE FORCES OF WINO.

1.1 ~

ANY STOCKPILES SHAll BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET AWAY FROM CONCENTRATED FLOWS OF STORM WATER, ORAIN~GE COURSES, mo
INLETS. All STOCKPILES SHAll BE BERMED. AOMIONAllY, STOCKPILES SHAll BE COVERED AT All llMES (To PROTECT THEM FROM THE WINO AND
THE RNN) WHEN THEY ME NOT AClliiELY BEING USED. STOCKPILES THAT ME UNSTADU2ED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACMES StWl BE SPRAYED
WITH WATER AS NEEDED FOR OUST CONTROL.

1.16

NN ABOVE GRADE OR MOBILE CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OR PlACED ONSITE IF CONCRETE TRUCKS OR COIICRill EQUIPMENT
SHAll BE WASHED ON-SITE. THE WASHOUT SHAll BE LOCATED A UINIUU~ OF 50 FEET AWAY FROM CONCENTRATED FLOWS OF STORM WATER,
DRAINAGE COURSES, AND INLETS. ADOmDNAL WASHOUTS SHAll BE UTIUZEO AS NEEDED.

1.17

IF NEEDED, A UCENSED SERVICE SHAll DEUVER AND WIINTAIN PORTABLE RESTROOMS TO THE PROJECT MEA. THE RESTROOM$ SHAll BE LOCATED
AW~Y FROM TRAFFIC AND DRAINAGE FACIUllES ON LEVEL HNND-PACKED OR P~VEO SURFACES.

DATE:

9-15-2016

AS DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL BE PROTECTED AFTER

OISTIURBANCE NND HAVE POST -CONSTRUCTION B~P'S IN
PlACE SUCH AS HYOROSEED OR OTHER ACCEPTNBLE METHOD.

~g~kACTDR

BMP CONSIDERA TION CHECKLI ST

BMP NO

~2~~~~~g~2~ SE~~~~\LERT

EC-1

SCHEDULING

NS-1

WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES

EC2

PRESERVATION OF EXISTING VEGETATION

NS-2

DEWATERING OPERATIONS

EC3

HYDRAULIC MULCH

NS-3

PAVING AND GRINDING OPERATIONS

EC-4

HYDROSEEDING

NS-4

TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING

EC-5

SOIL BINDERS

NS-5

CLEAR WATER DIVERSION

EC-6

STRAW MULCH

NS-6

ILLICIT CONNECTION/ DISCHARGE

EC-7

GEOTEXTILES & lolA TS

NS-7

POTABLE WATER/IRRIGATION

EC-8

WOOD MULCHING

NS-8

VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT CLEANING

EC9

EARTH DIKES & DRAINAGE SWALES

NS-9

VEHICLE AND EQU IPMENT FUELING

EC10

VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES

NS-10

VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE

Mlill;.

EC-11

SLOPE DRAINS

NS-11

PILE DRIVING OPERATIONS

EC-12

STREAMBANK STABILIZATION

NS-12

CONCRETE CURING

I.

EC-13

POLYACRYLAMIDE

NS-13

CONCRETE FINISHING

NS-14

MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT USE OVER WATER

DEMOLITION ADJACENT TO WATER

GRAD ING-DRAIN AGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN

SC: 1"=10'

DIAL 8-1-1

CALL 'TYwO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIGI

PRIOR TO ROLL INSTALLATION, CONTOUR A CONCAVE KEY TRENCH THREE (3}

INCHES MIN. TO FOUR ( 4) INCHES MAX. DEEP ALONG THE PROPOSED
INSTAllATION ROUTE.

BMP

BMP NO.

SE-1

SILT FENCE

SOIL EXCAVATED IN TRENCHING SHOULD BE REPLACE ON THE UPHILL OR FLOW

SIDE OF THE ROLL TO PREVENT WATER FROM UNDER CUTTING THE ROLL

SE-2

SEDIMENT BASIN

SE-3

SEDIMENT TRAP

3.

PLACE SEDIMENT ROLL INTO KEY TRENCH AND STAKE ON BOTH SIDES OF TIHE
ROLL TO WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF E.ACH END AND AND THEN EVERY THREE
(3} FEET WITH l"x2"x23" WOOD OR METAL STAKES.

SE-4

CHECK DAM

SE-5

SEDIMENT LOG

SE-6

GRAVE L BAG BERM

SE-7

STREET SWEEPING AND VACCUMMING

WM-4

SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL

SE-8

SAND BAG BARRIER

WM-5

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

ENTRENCHMENT DETAIL IN SLOPE AREA

'fr':%5"D]\ -~EOMENT LnG (lYP.)

(~------~~\--~~

CD SEDIMENT LOG DETAIL

NS-15
NS-16

P.O .
Box
2503
SAUNAs,CA 93902
p 831.757.5554
F 831 .757.2226

(6JC2 .1)

GRADING
DRAINAGE &

EROSION
CONTROL PLAN

SCALE:

as shown

DRAWN BY:

CH ECKED BY:
JOB NO.:

CCE 16-056

SHEET NO.:

Cl.O

TEMPORARY BATCH PLANTS

WM-1

MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE

WM2

MATERIAL USE

WM3

STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT

SE-9

STRAW BALE BARRIER

WM-6

HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT

SE-10

STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

WM7

CONTAMINATED SOIL MANAGEMENT

SE-11

CHEMICAL TREATMENT

WM-8

CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENT

WE-1

WM9

SANITARY/SEPTI C WASTE MANAGEMENT

WM10

LIQUID WASTE MAINTENANCE

TC-2

WIND EROSION CONTROL

STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE/EXIT
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY

TC-3

ENTRANCE/OUTLET TIRE WASH

TC-1

PLAN Vlt:N

STRUCTURAL

BMP

2.

ENTRENCHMENT DETAIL
IN FLAT AREA

CENTRAL COAST
ENGINEERS, INC.

BMP DETAILS REFER TO THE "2009 CASQA BMP HANDBOOK" NOT ALL
BM P'S REQUI RED ON THE PROJECT WILL BE SHOWN ON Tl-!E PLAN

SHALL VERIFY EXACT

LOCATION, SIZE AND DEPTH OF
EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO
TO
LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES 48 HOURS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AT 8 11.

CCE
DESIGN

NOTE:

SEDIMENT LOGS ARE TO BE INSTALLED FOLLOWING TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS.

010-103-012-000

\'1~-9

1.14

SEDIMENT LOG - SE-5 OR

SILT FENCE - SE-1

5.

APN:

A STAGING AREA SHAll BE DESIGNATED AT THE PROJECT. BMPS SELECTED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE SHAll ALSO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE
STAGING AREA. SPEC~ ATTENllON TO THE FOLLOWING B~PS StWl BE TAKEN AT THE PROJECT: NS-8, NS- 9, NS-10, WM- 1, WU-3, WM- 4,
WM-~.

STAKES ARE TYPICAL DRNEN IN ON ALTERNATING SIDES OF THE ROLL. WHEN

MORE THAN ONE ( 1) SEDIMENT ROLL IS PLACED IN A ROW, THE ROLL SHOULD
BE OVERLAPPED lWELVE ( 12) INCHES MIN. TO PROVIDE TIGHT JOINT, NOT
ABUTTED TO ONE ANOTHER.

Torres Street
5 NE of 4th A venue
Carmel- by -the-Sea
California
93921

REVISION S:

1.12

1.13

4.

I N C .

ONE -STORY GUEST HOUSE

CONCRETE RETAINING / FOUNDATION WALL

BENCHMARK

G R 0 UP

mo

THE D:RECTOR Of BUilDING INSPECTION (BUilDING omCIAl.) SHAll STOP OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF INCLEMENT WEATHER IF HE OR SHE DffiRMINES
THAT EROSION PROBLE~S ARE NOT BEING CONTROllED MJEQUATELY. (MCC 16.12.090 b 5)

ONE-STORY HOUSE
LOT 8

DESIGN

THE CONTRACTOR SHAll CONDUCT HIS OPERATIONS IN SUCH A MANNER THAT STORM RUNOFF SH.oiU BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE PROJECT OR
CHANNELED It/TO THE STORM ORNN SYSTEM WHICH SERVES THE RUNOFF AREA. STORM RUNOfF FROM ONE AREA SHAll NOT BE AllOWED TO
DIVERT TO ANOTHER RUNOFF AREA.

8.

D. RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS SHAll BE DETAINED DR nLTERED BY BERMS, VEGETATED mTER STRIPS, CATCH BASINS, OR OTHER MEANS AS NECESSARY TO
PREIIENT THE ESCAPE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE DISTURBED AREA.
E. NO EARTH OR ORGANIC MATERIAl SHAll BE DEPOSITED OR PLACED WHERE IT MAY BE DIRECTLY CAARIED INTO A STRENM, MARSH. SlOUGH, lAGOON OR BODY
OF STNNDING WATER.

B 0 L T 0 N

1.0

l)o nm scale drawings. V erity dimensions.

measuremenuanddataatbuildingor sile. Report

enors and quest1ons to BOG, INC

Jllc useofthese plans and specifications is

site for which

restrictedtotheori~inal

they were prepared

All drawings and written material appearing here

in constitLLte the original and unpu blished work of

BDG. INC. and the same may not be duplicated,
used or disc losed without written

con~ent

of

DOG, INC.

N.T.S.

110

@ BOLmN DESIGN GROUP. INC