Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

THE CITY OF NEW YORK

June 15, 2010

Governor David A. Paterson


Executive Chambers
New York State Capitol
Albany, NY 12224

Dear Governor Paterson:

The Citys Executive Budget relied on the Legislatures commitment to restore


$150 million of revenue-sharing funds about half of the money you proposed cutting by
zeroing out the City in your executive budget. Now that the Legislatures commitment
even to this partial restoration appears to be wavering, the City is facing the prospect of
more headcount and service reductions in the FY 11 budget. And over the long run, the
States refusal to include New York City in its revenue-sharing plans would be the
biggest blow to the Citys budget since the State repealed the Commuter Tax in 1999.

New York City residents should not bear more than 95% of the total statewide
revenue-sharing cut. All other cities, towns, and villages were cut only 1-5% each, while
New York City was cut a full 100%.

New York City is the States economic engine, and it generates nearly half of the
States entire revenue over $28 billion last year. Returning our full revenue-sharing
payment is still only one and one-eighth percent of the revenue we generate for the State.

The revenue-sharing cut is the largest cut to the City in the State budget
proposals. It is responsible for two-thirds of the State cuts to our non-education funds. It
will mean 50 fewer senior centers, the elimination of nurses at small schools, the closure
of a homeless drop-in center, and the elimination of adult literacy programs and it will
even affect City agencies that do not receive State funds. And, by undermining our ability
to deliver services that help attract private investment, it will hurt local job creation
and, with it, State tax revenues.

The impact of revenue sharing affects both the current and the next State fiscal
year. The commitment to fund New York City next year is crucial, and if the City is not
substantially funded in the current year, then a mere promise for future years will not be
sufficient to restore City services.
Every Governor since Thomas Dewey has included New York City in the States
revenue-sharing program. Over these past six decades, the funding has endured multiple
economic cycles and has been distributed in good times and bad. The elimination of New
York City from the program would end a commitment that has weathered fiscal crises far
worse than the current one. It is up to the States leadership not to allow the City to be
eliminated from the revenue-sharing program, and not to preside over an historic
abdication of responsibility to New York City.

Sincerely,

Michael R. Bloomberg Christine C. Quinn


Mayor City Council Speaker

cc: The Honorable John L. Sampson


The Honorable Dean G. Skelos
The Honorable Sheldon Silver
The Honorable Brian M. Kolb

You might also like