Figure 12.

Health Agencies Where Immunization was

Administered

7% Barangay Health Center

2%
Private Clinic
Hospital

90%

Table 12. Health Agencies Where Immunization was administered

Health Agencies Frequency Percentage

Barangay Health Center 37 90.24%
Private Clinic 1 2.44%
Hospital 3 7.32%
Total 41 100%
 Figure 13. Nutritional Status
6%

18%
SAFE (normal)
INTERMIDIATE (Below Normal)
Danger (Above normal and Very
Below Normal)

76%

Table 13. Nutritional Status

Status Frequency Percentage

Safe (normal) 72 75.79%
INTERMIDIATE (Below Normal) 17 17.89%
DANGER (Above normal and Very Below
6 6.32%
Normal)
Total 95 100%
 Figure 14. Milk Introduced to Children at Age 0-2 Year
Old
5%

20%
Mixed Feeding
Breast Milk
Commercial Milk

76%

Table 14. Milk Introduced to Children at Age 0-2 Year Old

Milk Frequency Percentage

Breast Milk 8 19.51%
Commercial Milk 2 4.88%
Mixed Feeding 31 75.61%
Total 41 100%
 Figure 15. Food Given to Children 0-2 Years Old

17%
24%
Rice
Vegetables
Fish
Meat
19% Friuts

21%

19%

Table 15. Food Given to Children aged 0-2 Years Old

Food Frequency Percentage

Rice 30 23.81%
Meat 24 19.05%
Fruits 22 17.46%
Fish 24 19.05%
Vegetables 26 20.63%
Total 126 100%
 Figure 16. Food Given to Children aged 3-5 Years Old
Fruits 15.18%

Vegetables 15.56%

Milk 15.95% Figure 16. Food Given to

Children aged 3-5 Years Old

Fish 17.12%

Meat 17.12%

Rice 19.07%

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00%

Table 16. Food Given to Children aged 3-6 Years Old

Food Frequency Percentage

Rice 49 19.07%
Meat 44 17.12%
Fruits 39 15.18%
Fish 44 17.12%
Vegetables 40 15.56%
Milk 41 15.95%
Total 257 100%
 Figure 17. Vitamin A Given to Children aged 12-59
months
3%

Yes
No

97%

Table 17. Vitamin A Given to Children aged 12-59 months

Response Frequency Percentage

Yes 56 96.55%

No 2 3.45%
Total 58 100%
 Figure 18. Type of Salt Used

26%

Iodized Salt
Ordinary Salt

74%

Table 18. Type of Salt Used

Type Frequency Percentage

Ordinary Salt 24 25.81%

Iodized Salt 69 74.19

Total 93 100%
 Figure 19. Number of Months Pregnant

7-9 mohs Pregnant

100%

Table 19. Number of Months Pregnant

Months Frequency Percentage

1-3

4-6

7-9 1 100%

Total 1 100%
 Figure 20. Number Pre-natal Check-ups

Thrice
Twice
Once

100%

Table 20. Number Pre-natal Check-ups

Number of Check-ups Frequency Percentage

Once 0 0%

Twice 0 0%

Thrice 1 100%

Total 1 100%
 Figure 21. Number of Tetanus Toxoid Received

1
2
3
4
None

100%

Table 21. Number of Tetanus Toxoid Received

Tetanus Toxoid Received Frequency Percentage

1 0 0%

2 0 0%
3 0 0%

4 1 100%
None 0 0%
Total 1 100%

Figure 22. Place of Pre-natal Check-up

Private Hospital/Clinic
Barangay Health Center
Birth Attendant
Others (specify)

100%

Table 22. Place of pre-natal Check-up

Places Frequency Percentage

Barangay Health Center 0 0%

Birth Attendant 0 0%

Private Hospital/Clinic 1 100%

Others (specify) 0 0%
Total 1 100%

Figure 27. Statusnof Drinking Water

7%

SAFE (COWD Faucet within the

house, Commercial Water
INTERMIDIATE (communal
faucet)
DANGER (artesian well, develop
spring)

93%
 Table 27. Status of Drinking Water

Status Frequency Percentage

SAFE (COWD Faucet within the House,

133 93.01%
Commercial Water)

INTERMEDIATE (communal faucet) 10 6.99%

DANGER (artesian well, develop spring) 0 0%

Total 143 100%

Figure 28. Presence of Toilet

6%

Yes
No

94%
 Table 28. Presence of Toilet

Presence Frequency Percentage

Yes 134 93.71%

No 9 6.29%

Total 143 100%

 Figure 29. Types of Toilet Used
1%

31%
Water Sealed
Flush
Unsanitary pit privy

69%

Table 29. Types of Toilet Used

Types of Toilet Frequency Percentage

Flush 41 30.60%

Water Sealed 92 68.66%

Unsanitary pit privy 1 .74%

Total 134 100%

 Figure 30. Status of Toilet
7%

SAFE (Flush, Water Sealed)

DANGER (Unsanitary pit privy,
No Toilet)

93%

Table 30. Status of Toilet

Status Frequency Percentage

SAFE ( Flush, Water Sealed) 133 93.01%

DANGER (Unsanitary pit privy, No Toilet) 10 6.99%

Total 143 100%
 Figure 31. Methods Used in Garbage Disposal
Garbage Can Without Cover 0.70%

Throwing Anywhere 0.70%

Using Sacs 2.10%

Figure 31. Methods Used in
Garbage Disposal
Compost pit 2.80%

Using plastic Bags 3.50%

No Methods Used 7.68%

Regular Garbage Collection 82.52%

Table 31. Methods Used in Garbage Disposal

Methods Of Garbage Disposal Frequency Percentage

Regular Garbage Collection 118 82.52%

No Methods Used 11 7.68%

Using Plastic Bags 5 3.50%

Compost pit 4 2.80%

Using Sacs 3 2.10%
Throwing Anywhere 1 .70%
Garbage Can without Cover 1 .70%
Total 143 100%
 Table 32. Status of Garbage Disposal
8%

8%
SAFE (Garbage can w/ cover,
regular garbage collection)
INTERMEDIATE (garbage can
w/out cover, sacks, plastic bags,
compost pit)
DANGER (throw anywhere, no
mehtods used)

84%

Table 32. Status of Garbage Disposal

Status Frequency Percentage

SAFE (garbage can w/ cover, regular garbage

120 83.92%
collection)

INTERMEDIATE (garbage can w/out cover,

12 8.39%
sacks, plastic bags, compost pit)

DANGER (throw anywhere, no methods used 11 7.69%

TOTAL 143 100%

 Figure 33. Status of Drainage Used

12%

INTERMEDIATE (Open Drainage)

DANGER (No Drainage)
25% SAFE (Closed Drainage)

63%

Table 33. Status of Drainage Used

Status Frequency Percentage

SAFE (closed drainage) 17 11.89%

INTERMEDIATE (Open Drainage) 90 62.94%

DANGER ( No Drainage) 36 25.17%

Total 143 100%

 Figure 34. Status of Sorroundings

INTERMEDIATE (MACKS-P only,

DOH herbal plants only,
incomplete MACKS-P and Herbal
44% Plants
DANGER (No MACKS-P and DOH
herbarl plants
56%

Table 34. Status of Surroundings

Status Frequency Percentage

INTERMEDIATE (MACKS-P only, DOH

herbal plants only, Incomplete MACKS-P 79 55.24%
herbal plants
DANGER (No MACKS-P and DOH Herbal
64 44.26%
Plants

Total 143 100%

Figure 35. Status of Family Health Insurance

8%

SAFE (Any family member

20% having a health insurance)
INTERMEDIATE (Planning to get
a health Insurance)
DANGER (No plan to get health
insurance)

72%

Table 35. Status of Family Health Insurance

 Status Frequency Percentage

SAFE (Any family member having a health

103 72.03%
insurance)

INTERMEDIATE ( Planning to get a health

29 20.28%
insurance)

DANGER ( No plan to get health insurance) 11 7.69%

Total 143 100%