Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Poverty: Measuring Inequality
Poverty: Measuring Inequality
Poverty: Measuring Inequality
MEASURING INEQUALITY
There are two ways in which we can see that equation, through size/personal and
functional.
1- Size distribution or personal
(Deals with individuals and households and total income they receive).
Sources of their incomes and time taken for them to earn such income are
ignored.
In this method, population is divided into either quintiles (5ths) deciles
(10ths) according to ascending incomes and see which group receives how
much income
Once categorized, various ways could be implemented to find out ratio of
inequality e.g. via Kuznets ratio
Kuznets ratio= top20/bottom40 one of the major ratios to determine
inequality
Also look at Lorenz Curve more curved=greater inequality .. lesser
bent=lesser inequality
Countries with highly unequal distribution lie between 0.50-0.70 and with
relatively equal lie between 0.20-0.30, In case of Pakistan, Gini Coefficient of
Pakistan traditionally between 0.30 and 0.45 from 1963-2001, latest 2013
Gini Co-efficient of Pakistan was 0.30 according to WB.
Four Important conditions satisfied by Gini Coefficient are
o Anonymity Principle (Rich or poor to be good or bad people)
o Scale independence (doesnt depend upon size of economy)
o Population independence (doesnt depend on number of income
recipient)
o Transfer principle (if we transfer from rich to poor person, income
more equal)
2- Functional Distribution
Functional or share distribution of income attempts to explain the share of
total national income that each FOP (Land, Labor, Capital) receives, rather
than looking at individuals.
ABSOLUTE POVERTY
Number of people who are unable to command sufficient resources to satisfy
basic needs
They are counted as total number of people who are living below a specified
number of real income.
Headcount = H/N (H people below poverty line, N total population).
An issue of total poverty gap may arise e.g. anyone earning $350/year and
$100 per year are both below the poverty lines, but $350 one can come out
of poverty quicker than $100/year
The new absolute poverty line of the world bank today is $1.90
Human poverty Index; UNDP came up with this measure, it wasnt satisfied
with WBs $1/day classification. Human poverty must be measures in terms of
three basic deprivations:
o Of Life (People unlikely to live beyond age of 40)
o
o
RELATIVE POVERTY:
As society becomes richer, so norms change and the levels of income and resources that are
considered to be adequate rises. Unless the poorest can keep up with growth in average incomes,
they will progressively become more excluded from the opportunities that the rest of society
enjoys. If substantial numbers of people do fall below such minimum standards then, not only
are they excluded from ordinary living patterns, but it demeans the rest of us and reduces overall
social cohesion in our society.
Relative poverty is the condition in which people lack the minimum amount of income needed
in order to maintain the average standard of living in the society in which they live
Why is relative Poverty bad?
1- Leads to economic inefficiency (lack of collateral, no savings, borrowing, poor
remains poor, rich people do not re-invest and it leads to capital flight)
2- Undermine social stability and solidarity
3- Generally viewed as unfair
MEASURING POVERTY
1- AHLUWALIA CHENERY WELFARE INDEX
2- HEADCOUNT.. H/N
3- TOTAL POVERTY GAP (Sum of difference between poverty line and
actual incomes of all people)
5-