2013 / 04

The impact of research and development strategy on the

profitability of economic enterprise

:





. .
:
Abstract:
In the light of globalization and the new changes, challenges are becoming bigger, competition is
intensifying and enterprises find themselves looking for appropriate solutions to keep pace with changes in
the field of science and technology and to maintain their market shares that ensure their survival, and
maximize their profits and to develop their competitiveness. The clear vision of the future provides
sufficient flexibility and the ability to respond to various and fast changes imposed by the competitive
environment. The research and development strategy associated with continuity of renewal is considered
one of the most important strategies that promote creativity and innovation and the creation of new
technologies to improve the performance of the enterprise and to achieve the total quality of products at
competitive prices that maximizes profits and develops their competitiveness compared to its competitors.
This is mainly the aim of this paper.

Key words: research and development, profitability, investment, technological change.

27

:


.



.




- -


.
:

- :

.
.I :
) ": R& D " (Research and Devlopment
1
".
" :
2
".

"
" : :
.

28

 / 04 2013

4
3 :
....

":
" 5


.



6
.
7
:

29

. .II :

.

8
9
:
.1
.2


.
:
... .
:10
: : : :
"" R&D

:
. :
""R&D

: ""R&D : :

30

 / 04 2013

: .

11
% 1.17 %1.66 .
- :


.
.I :


.12

" "R&D
:
) (PIB %2 . ) (01 %2 PIB ) 2008
%3 (PIB %2.48
- -2007-1996 % 0.64
%0.91
2011 405.3 ) 231 ( ) 153.7 ( )144.1
.
) (%4.5 ) (%3.7 ) (3.45% ) (%3.4 ) (%3.2 )(%2.9
) (2.8% ) (%2.6 ) (%2.5 )(%2.45
%3.5 . .
. %15.1
13
%24.9

31


- %90-80

%20-10 .
90-80
14
%20-10
%1 . %2 - 1
. %2
.15
.II :



16
.
17
""R&D

45% .
.18
""R&D

19
... .
:
2012 WIPO
2012 ) (
)( .
2012

:
20
.
:
32

 / 04 2013

- :




.
.I :

:

. 21
.1 :


.
22
.
.2 :
23
:
:
: : "."R&D : :
33

:
: :
....

.
:
.
.

24. ) (01 :
) :(01

:
, 9-8, , 2005 . 250

- :



.I :
) " ( Pierre Conse
" .
25
.

34

 / 04 2013

) ( Ezeramsoloman " :
26
".
" : )
...(
".
" A.CAPIES
"":

"" " ".27

: 28
=

%100

29
:
:
30
.
= (01) .........
= / (02) ......................
= / (03) ....

100
=


.
:

35

31
.


: = / /
.:
= /
32 : = + .
/ = .
/ = .
33.
.
: : 34
=

.
: )35 ( :
= +
:

36

= 1 / /
= /
.II :




... . :

36

 / 04 2013

.
37:
.
- :


.


38
:

. 30


.
1985
1990
IBM ) ( ) Matsushita (
39
.



.



.

37

:


.

.

.

:01 ) % (
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

0,47 0,57 0,64 0,71 0,74 0,81 0,93 1,02 1,12 1,20 1,27 1,27 1,47

1,79 1,77 1,80 1,82 1,86 1,85 1,89 1,86 1,84 1,84 1,87 1,88 2,00

0,79 0,83 0,66 0,68 0,71 0,83 0,85 0,85 0,81 0,81 0,81 0,87 0,84

1,76 1,78 1,75 1,84 1,80 1,86 1,83 1,86 1,83 1,82 1,85 1,85 1,95

2,26 2,29 2,31 2,38 2,44 2,47 2,40 2,39 2,33 2,36 2,38 2,39 2,48

: OCDE

0,53

0,59 0,58 0,57 0,56 0,56 0,62 0,63 0,65

0,66 0,70 0,75 0,78 0,81 0,85 0,90 0,91 1,07

0,56

0,63 0,63 0,64 0,66 0,67 0,67 0,67 0,73 0,73 0,74 0,75 0,75
2,01 2,05 2,06 2,13 2,13 2,15 2,11 2,09 2,04 2,04 2,04 2,01 2,14

38

 / 04 2013

:
1 1992 . 113
2 2000
. 25-24 :
3 : . :
www.competitiveness.gov.jo/files/RD_Driver.pdf
4 - : 1981 . 257
9 10 2004 . 163
5 1998 1 . 7
6 2001 . 208-207 :
7 : 1 ..82
2004 .214
8 . 389
9 - : 1
. 75-74 :
10 : . 164
11
2000 . 116
12 1995 . 261
13 .. 2012-06-20
http://alroya.info/ar/alroya-newspaper/report/35450
14
) ( 8-6 .2012
15 :
2013/06/15
http://www.alarabimag.net/Book/Article.asp?ART=717&ID=27
16
, 9-8 2005 . 239
17 2000
.83
18 : 2013/02/22
. http://economy.awardspace.com/p13.htm
19
2 - 3 2005 .
WIPO, The global innovation index 2012, pp : 8-13. 20
21 .
22 "

39

www.ahram.org.eg/acpss
23 http://www.hrdiscussion.com/hr30608.html 2013/02/2
24 -251:
.256
25 : 01 2002 .21
26 1982 . 14
27 . 23
28 . 27
29 1 1999
. 223-219 :
30 . 80
31 1999 1 288
32 . 226
33 2000 . 289
34 . 81-80 :
35
2000 . 149
36 . 151-150 :
37 1996 2 730
38 . 242
39 . 93-89 :

40