Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Inong, C.A.A.F. (2003)
United States v. Inong, C.A.A.F. (2003)
v.
No. 00-0327
Crim. App. No. 9801667
He
review, and for the first time at either the trial or appellate
level, he sought sentence relief for what he argued was illegal
pretrial punishment.
In Southwick and
II.
We further hold
Prior to his
That is
Counsel said:
Id. at
United
Southwick, 53 M.J. at
We
10
He is therefore
Today,
11
Id.
Unfortunately, Huffmans
Id.
Obviously, raising an
12
That is
Id.
Id.
13
tantamount to confinement).
14
15
Therefore, I join
M.J. 110, 115 (Baker, J., with whom Erdmann, J., joined
concurring in result).