The document discusses concerns about the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), including that it threatens wildlife, water quality, and land due to potential spills over major riverways. It notes that landowners are having their property rights seized via eminent domain and that the oil transported will likely be exported rather than creating energy independence. Additionally, it states that Dakota Access began construction without completing a full environmental impact statement and that the permitting process avoided proper consultation with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Yankton Sioux Tribe.
The document discusses concerns about the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), including that it threatens wildlife, water quality, and land due to potential spills over major riverways. It notes that landowners are having their property rights seized via eminent domain and that the oil transported will likely be exported rather than creating energy independence. Additionally, it states that Dakota Access began construction without completing a full environmental impact statement and that the permitting process avoided proper consultation with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Yankton Sioux Tribe.
The document discusses concerns about the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), including that it threatens wildlife, water quality, and land due to potential spills over major riverways. It notes that landowners are having their property rights seized via eminent domain and that the oil transported will likely be exported rather than creating energy independence. Additionally, it states that Dakota Access began construction without completing a full environmental impact statement and that the permitting process avoided proper consultation with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Yankton Sioux Tribe.
The document discusses concerns about the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), including that it threatens wildlife, water quality, and land due to potential spills over major riverways. It notes that landowners are having their property rights seized via eminent domain and that the oil transported will likely be exported rather than creating energy independence. Additionally, it states that Dakota Access began construction without completing a full environmental impact statement and that the permitting process avoided proper consultation with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Yankton Sioux Tribe.
citizens, threatening wildlife, water quality, and land integrity. Routed over two major riverways, (the Missouri River and the Mississppi River) the pipeline is a national threat.
sacredstonecamp.org
Landowners are having their property rights
seized via eminent domain. Oil will likely be transported to the Gulf Coast and exported;this pipeline will not create energy independence.
In violation of federal law, Dakota Access has begun
construction without completing a full Enivonmental Clean-up efforts at spills in North Dakota and Impact Statement. Michigan have lasted for years and cost millions to taxpayers. The DAPL permitting process has continually avoided proper nation-to-naion consultation with the Standing Job creation benets are minimal: full-time Rock Sioux Tribe and the Yankton Sioux Tribe. permanent positions for North Dakotans created as a result of the pipeline are estimated at less than ten; Citizens will bear the cost of producing prots for out-of-state corporations.