Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Composites: Part A
Composites: Part A
Composites: Part A
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesa
Departamento de Qumica, Universidade Federal do Piau, Campus Ininga, 64049-550 Teresina, PI, Brazil
Instituto de Qumica, Unicamp, C. Postal 6154, 13084-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 October 2009
Received in revised form 26 March 2010
Accepted 13 April 2010
Keywords:
A. Discontinuous reinforcement
B. Fiber/matrix bond
B. Mechanical properties
D. Mechanical testing
a b s t r a c t
Buriti (Mauritia exuosa) is a robust palm tree, abundant in the northeast of Brazil. Buriti bers are rich in
cellulose and have potential applications in polymer reinforcement. In this work, buriti bers were used:
as received, mercerized and in a silanized form. They were combined with cardanolformaldehyde thermoset resin and hot-pressed to form composites. Scanning electron micrograph showed that the mercerization process induced a roughness onto the ber surface. Dynamic mechanical analyses showed that
increasing the ber content provides an improvement in the rigidity of the composites. The mercerization
treatment showed the best results for ber/matrix adhesion.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
At present there is a signicant trend to use renewable
resources to produce materials with appropriate mechanical properties for several applications. Composites using natural bers are
the best candidates for substituting metals and short berglass
reinforced thermosets. The mixture of materials in a composite
aims to improve the thermal and mechanical properties, giving
them more versatility. Composite materials have a broad range of
industrial applications, particularly in the automotive industry
[13]. The mixture of different materials allows the utilization of
synthetic and natural materials or the utilization of chemically
modied natural compounds.
The investigation of plant bers, such as cotton, curaua, coconut
and banana, dispersed in a polymeric matrix is a growing eld of
research, because of their low abrasiveness to the processing
equipment, reducing energy consumption and consequently lowering costs in the productive sector. Plant bers are biodegradable
and their composites with polymers can be thermally recycled,
yielding carbon credits. Besides, natural bers are very efcient
for sound absorption and fracture resistance when compared to
glass bers [4]. However, the natural bers have disadvantages
such low mechanical resistance, when compared to conventional
bers (asbestos, Kevlar, carbon and glass bers) and present the
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: mdepaoli@iqm.unicamp.br (M.-A. De Paoli).
1359-835X/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.04.010
1124
OH
C15H 31-2n
Cardanol
Fig. 1. Cardanol, a natural phenolic compound obtained from the cashew nut shell
liquid (CNSL).
The cashew tree (Anacardium occidentale) is found in the northeast region of Brazil, mainly in the Piau and Cear states. During
industrial processing, the cashew nut liberates the CNSL. The major
component in industrial CNSL is cardanol, Fig. 1, a phenolic
compound with a long unsaturated hydrocarbon chain (C15) substituted in the meta position [1618]. This hydrocarbon chain acts as
an internal plasticizer, giving exibility to the phenolformaldehyde resins that can be formed with it. Cardanol condenses with
formaldehyde producing a polymer network similar to phenol
formaldehyde resins. Misra and Pandey investigated in detail the
reaction mechanism of cardanolformaldehyde resin formation
[19].
In this work we describe in detail the preparation of the cardanolformaldehyde thermoset resin, chemical treatment of the
buriti bers and the composite preparation. The natural bers used
in the preparation of the composite were obtained from the straw
of buriti leaves. The aims of this work are: (1) to prepare composite
materials from thermoset cardanolformaldehyde resin using
buriti bers as reinforcement in different proportions; (2) to investigate the morphologies of the bers before and after treatment
and of the composite materials; (3) to study the thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of the composite materials using
thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic
mechanical analysis.
at break 3.3 0.7% and modulus 10.2 2.2 GPa. The density, measured using a helium picnometer, was 1.312 0.009 g cm3.
For mercerization, the buriti bers were treated with a 20% (w/
v) aqueous NaOH solution for 60 min at 25 C, washed with distilled water until neutral pH and dried in an oven at 60 C for
24 h, yielding mercerized bers (MBF).
For silanization the buriti bers were immersed in a 2% (v/v) 3aminopropyltrimethoxysilane solution in ethanol (95% purity) for
5 min. The pH was adjusted to 5.5 using acetic acid. To hydrolyze
the coupling agent the bers were exposed to air for 30 min. The
reaction between the hydroxyl groups from the ber and the silane
was induced by heating in an oven at 60 C for 2 h [20,21], yielding
silanized bers (SBF).
2.3. Preparation of the composites
2. Experimental procedure
2.1. Materials
1125
exural stress and strain were rf = 3PL/2bh2 and ef = 6Dh/L2 respectively, where P is the load (N), L is the support span (mm), D is the
maximum deection of the center of the sample (mm), b and h are
the width and dept (mm) of the samples, respectively [22].
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Thermogravimetric analysis
The TG curves for UTBF, SBF and MBF are shown in Fig. 2a and
present two main mass loss processes. The rst occurs between 60
and 100 C with a mass loss of ca. 8%, which can be attributed to
elimination of water from the silanized and untreated bers. This
mass loss is due to the hydrophilicity of the plant bers [2325].
The second process of mass loss starts at ca. 150 C for the UTBF
and SBF samples. This process can be attributed to thermal decomposition of the constituents of plant bers (pectin, lignin and hemicellulose). For MBF this process showed a signicant shift to higher
temperatures (230 C) suggesting an increased thermal stability
in comparison to UTBF and SBF. In addition, the MBF showed only
3.0% of mass loss attributed to elimination of water. Residues of
36%, 34% and 25%, at 800 C, for SBF, MBF and UTBF, respectively,
are probably due to the non-oxidizing atmosphere used in the
experiment.
The comparison between the TG curves for MBF, MC-10 and
CFR, Fig. 2b, indicate that the composite presents an intermediate
thermal behavior in relation to the ber and the matrix. The TG
curve for CFR and MC-10 showed a low mass loss starting at ca.
70 C, associated to the elimination of water obtained as a product
during the thermoset cure reaction. The composite curve shows an
inection at ca. 350 C, due to the thermal degradation of the ber
and at ca. 400 C, due to the thermal degradation of the thermoset
resin, as compared to the corresponding mass loss temperature of
the pure thermoset.
3.2. Differential scanning calorimetry
The DSC curves for the composite (with 10 wt.% of mercerized
ber), pure resin, untreated and treated bers are shown in
Fig. 3. The curves in Fig. 3a, for UTBF, MBF and SBF, show endothermic peaks between 60 and 80 C assigned to water loss. The water
loss for MBF occurred at temperatures higher than for the UTBF
and SBF samples. This probably occurs due to the higher number
of hydroxyl groups at the surface of the mercerized bers, which
allows for stronger hydrogen bonding with the water. The large
exothermic events that occur between 200 and 370 C are assigned
(a)
UTBF
SBF
MBF
The SEM micrographs of the UTBF, MBF and SBF samples, Fig. 4,
show the morphological changes on the bers surfaces due to the
different chemical treatments applied. The SEM image for mercerized ber (Fig. 4b) shows a rough aspect, probably due to the removal of low molar mass compounds, which occurs during
mercerization, leaving cavities at the surface. The high roughness
of the ber surface provides a larger number of anchorage points
for the polymeric matrix, increasing the interaction between the
components of the composite. The silanized ber, shown in
Fig. 4b, presents a more regular surface. This suggests that silanization produces a lm coating the entire ber surface.
(b)
MBF
MC-10
CFR
100
80
80
60
40
20
Weight (%)
Weight (%)
100
60
40
20
Temperature (C)
Temperature (C)
Fig. 2. Thermogravimetric curves under inert atmosphere for: (a) mercerized (MBF), silanized (SBF) and untreated (UTBF) buriti bers and (b) composite with 10 wt.% MBF
(MC-10), mercerized ber and cardanolformaldehyde resin (CFR).
1126
(a)
(b)
Exo
MBF
SBF
UTBF
50
100
150
200
250
MC-10
Exo
300
350
400
CFR
MBF
50
Temperature (C)
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Temperature (C)
Fig. 3. DSC curves for: (a) untreated, mercerized and silanized buriti bers and (b) mercerized ber, cardanolformaldehyde thermoset resin and for the composite
containing 10 wt.% of mercerized buriti ber. Symbols in the curves were used only to identify the samples, they do not correspond to single experimental results.
90 m
90 m
400 m
(a)
400 m
(b)
(c)
400 m
(d)
90 m
400 m
Fig. 4. SEM micrographs: (a) untreated buriti ber; (b) mercerized buriti ber; (c) silanized buriti ber (inserts show details with higher magnication) and (d) composite
MC-10 sample (arrows indicate the bers).
The SEM micrograph for the MC-10 composite sample, Fig. 4d,
shows a lamellar like morphology for the polymeric matrix. This
may confer mechanical fragility to this material. As can be observed in Fig. 4d, there is an excellent adhesion between the matrix
and the mercerized bers (indicated by the arrows in Fig. 4d). In
the case of this composite, the good coverage of the ber by the resin may prevent its exposure to air, improving its stability to
oxidation.
Phenolic thermoset resins usually present micropores that provide low thermal resistance [29,30]. In the case of CFR and the
1127
400
350
tan
300
CFR
MC-5
MC-10
MC-15
tan
0.20
600
150
450
0.12
300
0.08
0.08
150
0.04
0.04
50
E'
E'
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0.00
50
100
Temperature (C)
(d)
0.28
200
250
300
0.00
21
0.20
18
0.16
0.12
100
tan
200
24
0.24
E" (MPa)
CFR
CS-5
CS-10
CS-15
tan
150
Temperature (C)
400
300
E' (MPa)
0.16
tan
0.12
200
100
(c)
0.20
0.16
250
tan
E' (MPa)
(b) 750
0.24
CFR
UTC-5
MC-5
SC-5
E' (MPa)
(a)
RCF
CM-5
CS-5
CUT-5
15
12
0.08
0.04
0.00
E'
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Temperature (C)
50
100
150
200
250
300
Temperature (C)
Fig. 5. Variation of E0 modulus and tan d as a function of temperature for the composites with: (a) 5 wt.% mercerized, silanized and natural ber; (b) with 0, 5, 10 and 15 wt.%
of mercerized bers; (c) with 0, 5, 10 and 15 wt.% of silanized bers and (d) variation of E00 modulus for the composites with 5 wt.% of mercerized, silanized and natural ber,
in function of temperature.
Fig. 5b shows the curves of E0 modulus and tan d for the composites with different concentrations of mercerized bers. The increase
in the mercerized ber/resin ratio provides an increase in the E0 modulus, and a lowering in tan d. This indicates an increased rigidity and
lower energy dissipation for the composites richer in bers. Additionally, a distinct behavior was observed for composites obtained
with silanized bers, as observed in Fig. 5c, showing that increasing
the bers content, up to 15 wt.%, provides a lowering of the E0 modulus and an increase of tan d. This suggests a lower ber/matrix
interaction, reducing the stiffness of the composite material.
Fig. 5d shows the variation of loss modulus (E00 ) versus temperature for the thermoset and the composites with untreated and
treated bers. The curves show two badly dened peaks, the rst
at ca. 80 C, and the second at ca. 175 C. The rst peak suggests
the occurrence of chain segment movements, localized at the
crosslinking bonds, i.e. similar to a glass transition (Tg). The second
peak is assigned to the curing of the resin. It is also observed that a
relative decrease in the amount of resin in the material provides a
lowering in the intensity of the Tg peak. This fact suggests a reduction of the free volume in the composite.
The stressstrain behavior of composites with different buriti ber treatments and contents are shown in Fig. 6. The stressstrain
curves for the CFR and the composites with 5 wt.% of ber, shown
in Fig. 6a, show that the pure thermoset is more fragile than the
composites, with lower yield stress and strain at break. Although
the module of the pure thermoset and the composites are very
similar, the composite with mercerized bers showed the higher
stress at yield. This corroborates again with the better ber to matrix adhesion in this composite.
1128
(a)
(b)
MC-5
MC-10
UTC-5
2
CFR
MC-5
MC-15
SC-5
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
CFR
1
10
12
Strain (%)
10
12
Strain (%)
Fig. 6. Stressstrain curves for: (a) thermoset resin compared to the composites with 5 wt.% of chemically treated bers and (b) composites containing 0, 5, 10 and 15 wt.% of
mercerized bers.
1129
[31] Mafezzoli A, Cal E, Zurlo S, Mele G, Tarzia A, Stifani C. Cardanol based matrix
biocomposites reinforced with natural bres. Compos Sci Technol
2004;64(6):83945.
[32] Mohanty S, Verma SK, Nayak SK. Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of
MAPE treated jute/HDPE composites. Compos Sci Technol 2006;66(3):53847.
[33] Menard PK. Dynamic mechanical analysis: a practical introduction. New
York: RCR Press LLC; 1999.
[34] Pothan LA, Thomas S. Polarity parameters and dynamic mechanical behaviour
of chemically modied banana ber reinforced polyester composites. Compos
Sci Technol 2003;63(9):123140.
[35] Keusch S, Haessler R. Inuence of surface treatment of glass bres on the
dynamic mechanical properties of epoxy resin composites. Composites: Part A
1999;30(8):9971002.