Reference to

Resources

Peer Reply

Advanced
The videos,
readings, and
stats were
referenced in the
blog posting. The
references
support the
position taken by
the blog
comment. (4 pts)

Proficient
The videos,
readings, and
stats were
referenced in
the blog posting.
The references
back to videos,
readings, and
stats were on
topic, but did
not
support any
position. (3 pts)

Basic
The videos,
readings, and
stats were
referenced.
However, the
references back
to the videos,
readings, and
stats were not
on topic, or
failed to show
knowledge of
the resources. (2
pts)

Below Basic
The videos,
readings, and
stats were not
referenced. (1
pt. or less)

Acknowledged
something your
peer said. Built
on their comment
by adding
personal
experience.
Concluded with
a critical thinking
or Socratic
question to the
individual or
class. (4 pts)

Evidence of all
but one of the
following:
Acknowledged
something your
peer said. Built
on their
comment by
adding personal
experience.
Concluded with
a critical
thinking or
Socratic
question to the
individual or
class. (3pts)

Evidence of all
but two of the
following:
Acknowledged
something your
peer said. Built
on their
comment by
adding personal
experience.
Concluded with
a critical
thinking or
Socratic
question to the
individual or
class.
(2 pts)

Replied to
peer, but did
not provide
contributing
content to
the discussion.
(1 pt.)

Score

Grammar

Little to no
grammatical
errors. Content
was clearly
proofread and
professional
quality. (2 pts)

2-3 grammatical
errors are
evident. Content
shows
professional
quality but
needed to be
proofread for
errors. (1 pt.)

3-6 grammatical
errors are
evident. Editing
needed and
content is not
professionally
written. (0 pts)

More than 6
grammatical
errors are
evident. Must
be corrected
and
resubmitted. (0
pts)

/10