Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0926860X08001105 Main
1 s2.0 S0926860X08001105 Main
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 20 October 2007
Received in revised form 14 February 2008
Accepted 18 February 2008
Available online 10 March 2008
Catalytic oxidation of p-xylene (PX) to terephthalic acid (TA) was studied with catalysts containing cobalt
acetate, manganese acetate, CoBr2 and MnBr2. The catalysts contain neither highly corrosive hydrogen
bromide nor other metal ions, and have the advantage of easy catalyst recovery. The effects of Br/Co
atomic ratio, reaction time and temperature, PX concentration, oxygen pressure, and catalyst
concentration on PX conversion and product/intermediate yields were investigated. The catalyst system
had a suitable reaction temperature of 100 8C, which was much lower than the commercial process
temperature (175225 8C). The maximum product (TA) yield was 93.5%, obtained at a Br/Co atomic ratio
of three. Higher Br concentration resulted in the lower TA yield, which was ascribed to the benzylic
bromide formation. The synthesis of TA could be adequately described as four reaction steps in series
(PX ! p-tolualdehyde ! p-toluic acid ! 4-carboxybenzaldehyde ! TA), with a pseudo-rst-order rate
equation for each step, and the third step was rate-limiting. The rate constant ratios (kj/k3, j = 1 ! 4)
obtained at 100 8C were similar to the kj/k3 values reported earlier for cobalt acetate/manganese acetate/
HBr catalysts in a range of 185191 8C.
2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Oxidation catalysts
Cobalt bromide
Manganese bromide
p-Xylene
Terephthalic acid
1. Introduction
Transition metal-catalyzed autoxidation of p-xylene (PX) to
terephthalic acid (TA) is one of the largest industrial-scale
applications of homogeneous catalysis [1]. Puried terephthalic
acid (PTA) is the ninth largest industrial chemical [2], which is used
as raw material for the production of saturated polyestermainly
polyethylene terephthalate (abbreviated as PET) [3].
Most of PTA used worldwide is manufactured by the Amoco
Mid-Century (MC) method, which uses a catalyst consisting of
cobalt acetate Co(OAc)2, manganese acetate Mn(OAc)2 and
hydrobromic acid (HBr) [2,4,5]. The Amoco process is operated
at high temperature (175225 8C) and pressure (1530 atm) of air
in an acetic acid medium [6]. Solutions of HBr are highly corrosive,
are very dangerous to handle and are highly harmful to the
environment. It is highly desired to eliminate HBr in the TA
production process. CoBr2 and MnBr2 have lower corrosion
characteristics than HBr [7]. However, no scientic literature
has reported the catalytic performances of CoBr2-MnBr2 contain-
272
2. Experimental
The oxidation experiments were carried out with a 300 ml
stirred reactor made of titanium (supplied by Parr Instruments
Co.). The high-pressure autoclave was equipped with a temperature control unit, a pressure gage, a gas inlet valve, a gas sparger, an
agitator, a liquid sampling valve, and a gas release valve.
In a typical run, a specic amount of p-xylene (TEDIA, Faireld,
OH, USA), a specic amount of catalyst containing CoBr2, MnBr2,
cobalt acetate (Co(OAc)2) and manganese acetate (Mn(OAc)2) (all
from Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 60 ml of glacial acetic acid
(HOAc) (Scharlau Chemie, Barcelona, Spain) were mixed together
and charged into the reactor. After reaching the desired
temperature, pure oxygen was introduced into the reactor at a
desired pressure (2 atm or 10 atm) and the agitator speed was set
at 300 rpm. At the end of the reaction, solid and liquid products
were separated. The recovered solid product was dried and
weighed. Dimethyl sulfoxide was used to dissolve the components
in solid and liquid products and the component compositions were
determined with a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) high performance
liquid chromatography (model: LC-10A) equipped with a 250 mm
long C-18 column and a UV detector (wavelength was set at
254 nm). The p-xylene conversion was dened as (moles of pxylene reacted)/(moles of p-xylene fed to the reactor) 100%. The
yields of product (terephthalic acid) and intermediates ( ptolualdehyde, p-toluic acid (PT), 4-carboxybenzaldehyde, terephthaldicarboxaldehyde) were dened as (moles of the product
or intermediate produced)/(moles of p-xylene fed to the
reactor) 100%. The selectivity of product and intermediate were
dened as (moles of the product or intermediate produced)/(moles
of p-xylene reacted) 100%.
3. Results and discussion
The oxidation of p-xylene was carried out at seven Br/Co atomic
ratios (catalyst compositions are listed in #1 ! #7 of Table 1), two
catalyst concentrations (#4 and #8 of Table 1), three reaction
temperatures (100 8C, 110 8C, 120 8C), three PX concentrations (PX/
solvent weight ratio = 0.08, 0.16, and 0.32), and two oxygen
pressures (2 atm and 10 atm). The effects of these variables on PX
conversion and product/intermediate yields were investigated. In
addition, rate equations were obtained from the concentration
proles of reactant, intermediates and product.
3.1. Effect of Br/Co atomic ratio
CoBr2/Co(OAc)2/MnBr2/Mn(OAc)2 catalysts with seven Br/Co
atomic ratios (ratio = 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) were used for the oxidation
of p-xylene at 100 8C. The amounts of CoBr2/Co(OAc)2/MnBr2/
Mn(OAc)2 added for varying Br/Co atomic ratio are shown in
#1 ! #7 of Table 1. Fig. 1 shows TA yield as a function of Br/Co
atomic ratio under the following condition: PX/HOAc weight
ratio = 0.08, reaction time = 1 h, Mn/Co atomic ratio = 2, and
oxygen pressure = 10 atm. When Br/Co atomic ratio is less than
Table 1
Catalyst compositions used for studying the effects of Br/Co atomic ratio and catalyst concentration
#
Br/Co ratio
CoBr2 (mmol)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1.5
2
3
4
5
6
3
0.075
0.1125
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.15
0.225
MnBr2 (mmol)
0.075
0.15
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.45
Co(OAc)2 (mmol)
Mn(OAc)2 (mmol)
0.075
0.038
0.075
0.075
0.15
0.075
0.3
0.3
0.225
0.15
0.225
0.45
273
Fig. 2. TA yield as a function of reaction time for catalysts with Br/Co atomic
ratios = 3, 4, and 6 (PX/HOAc weight ratio = 0.16, oxygen pressure = 10 atm, Mn/Co
atomic ratio = 2, reaction temperature = 100 8C).
Fig. 3. TA yield as a function of reaction time for catalysts with Br/Co atomic
ratios = 3 and 6 (PX/HOAc weight ratio = 0.32, oxygen pressure = 10 atm, Mn/Co
atomic ratio = 2, reaction temperature = 100 8C).
274
Fig. 6. Species dimensionless concentrations vs. reaction time for catalyst with Br/
Co atomic ratio = 3 and three times catalyst concentration. Reaction conditions:PX/
HOAc weight ratio = 0.32, oxygen pressure = 10 atm, reaction temperature = 100 8C,
catalyst composition is listed in #8 of Table 1.
yield obtained at 10 atm is 91.2% (at t = 9 h, shown in Fig. 6), but the
maximum TA yield obtained at 2 atm is only 14.4% (at t = 12 h,
shown in Fig. 7). At 2 atm (Fig. 7), PX concentration is still
signicant (conversion = 85%) at t = 9 h, therefore, the PX concentration prole can be used to determine the kinetics of the rst
step reaction (PX ! TALD). At 10 atm (Fig. 6), PX disappears
completely at t = 1.5 h.
In Figs. 57, the sum of the nal product (TA) and intermediate
(TALD, PT, 4-CBA, and TDAD) concentrations is approximately
equal to the initial reactant (PX) concentration. The mole balance
on aromatic compounds indicates that the combustion of aromatic
species to COx (CO and CO2) was negligible under the experimental
conditions.
3.4. Effect of temperature
Table 2 shows the effect of reaction temperature on PX
conversion and product/intermediate yield in the range of 100
120 8C. It is surprising to nd that PX conversion decreases with
increasing reaction temperature in the temperature range. Therefore, the suitable reaction temperature for the CoBr2/cobalt
acetate/MnBr2/manganese acetate catalyst system is 100 8C.
Table 3
Rate constants at P O2 2 atm and Br/Co atomic ratio = 3
Temperature
PX conversion (%)
TA yield (%)
TALD yield (%)
PT yield (%)
4-CBA yield (%)
TDAD yield (%)
100 8C
110 8C
120 8C
94.2
11.2
5.0
71.6
5.7
0.7
87.6
18.1
2.3
57.9
8.8
0.5
62.9
0.5
15.9
44.1
1.8
0.6
k2
k3
k4
A!B!C!D!E
(1)
(2)
dC B
k1 C A k2 C B
dt
(3)
dC C
k2 C B k3 C C
dt
(4)
dC D
k3 C C k4 C D
dt
(5)
CA
ek1 t
C A0
(6)
CB
k1
ek1 t ek2 t
C A0 k2 k1
(7)
k1 k2 e
k3 k2 k3 k1
Catalyst composition
is listed in #4 of Table 1
Catalyst composition
is listed in #8 of Table 1
k1
k2
k3
k4
0.0466 (= 3.11k3)
0.26 (= 17.33k3)
0.015
0.15 (= 10k3)
0.1794 (= 3.98k3)
0.5 (= 11.1k3)
0.045
0.46 (= 10.22k3)
CD
k1 k2 k3 ek1 t ek4 t
k1 k2 k3 ek2 t ek4 t
C A0 k3 k1 k2 k1 k4 k1 k3 k2 k2 k1 k4 k2
k1 k2 k3 ek3 t ek4 t
k3 k2 k3 k1 k4 k3
(8)
(9)
(10)
Suitable rate constants (k1 ! k4) were substituted into Eqs. (6)(9)
for calculating the dimensionless species concentrations (Cj/CA0,
j = A, B, C, D, E) as a function of reaction time (t), and the calculated
values were compared with the experimental data. Comparisons of
the calculated values and the experimental data are shown in
Fig. 8(A)(D). Fig. 8(A) and (B) are the comparisons for P O2 2 atm
with two different catalyst concentrations (#4 and #8 in Table 1,
respectively), Fig. 8(C) and (D) are the comparisons for P O2
10 atm with two different catalyst concentrations (#4 and #8 in
Table 1, respectively). Fig. 8(A)(D) indicates that pseudo-rstorder kinetics is able to t the experimental data satisfactorily. The
reaction rate constants (k1 ! k4) used to t the experimental data
are listed in Table 3 (for P O2 2 atm) and in Table 4 (for
PO2 10 atm), which mostly indicate that k2 > k4 > k1 > k3 (except
for P O2 10 atm, k1 k4). That is, the third-step reaction (PT ! 4CBA) is the slowest and controls the overall rate of PX oxidation to
TA. In Tables 3 and 4, the values of k1, k3, k4 increase approximately
linear with increasing catalyst amount, which suggests that steps
1, 3, and 4 were operated under chemical control condition. The
increase of k2 is less than the increase of catalyst amount (k2 is
approximately doubled when catalyst amount is tripled), which
indicates that the second step (the fastest step) might be affected
by mass transfer.
In Fig. 8(A)(D), rate constants (k1 ! k4) do not vary with the
reaction time, which indicates that catalyst deactivation was not
signicant under the experimental conditions.
For Co(OAc)2/Mn(OAc)2/HBr catalyzed PX oxidation in HOAc
and in the temperature range of 184197 8C, Wang et al. [15]
proposed the following kinetic model for the reaction scheme
shown in Eq. (1):
r j k j P4
Cj
(11)
bj
di C i u
where rj and kj are the rate and the rate constant of jth step reaction,
respectively, Cj is the concentration of the jth component, d, u and b
are kinetic parameters. They also found that k2 > k4 > k1 > k3, and
Table 4
Rate constants at P O2 10 atm and Br/Co atomic ratio = 3
Rate constants (h1)
Catalyst composition
is listed in #4 of Table 1
Catalyst composition
is listed in #8 of Table 1
k1
k2
k3
k4
0.699 (= 3.58k3)
3.9 (= 20k3)
0.195
0.75 (= 3.85k3)
2.69 (= 4.6k3)
7.5 (= 12.82k3)
0.585
2.3(= 3.93k3)
k2 t
CC
k1 k2 e
k1 k2 e
C A0 k3 k1 k2 k1 k3 k2 k2 k1
k3 t
i1
k1 t
275
276
K.-T. Li, S.-W. Li / Applied Catalysis A: General 340 (2008) 271277
Fig. 8. (a) Test of pseudo-rst-order kinetic model for PX oxidation to TA. Reaction conditions: oxygen pressure = 2 atm, PX/HOAc weight ratio = 0.32, reaction temperature = 100 8C, catalyst composition is listed in #4 of Table 1. The
right coordinate is for PX concentration, the left coordinate is for other species concentrations. (b) Test of pseudo-rst-order kinetic model for PX oxidation to TA (reaction conditions are the same as those used for Fig. 7). (c) Test of
pseudo-rst-order kinetic model for PX oxidation to TA (reaction conditions are the same as those used for Fig. 5). (d) Test of pseudo-rst-order kinetic model for PX oxidation to TA (reaction conditions are the same as those used for
Fig. 6).
the rate constant ratios they obtained were in the following ranges:
k1/k3 = 3.8 ! 5.43; k2/k3 = 14 ! 21.9; k4/k3 = 9.1 ! 10.12. The rate
constants obtained by Wang et al. are unexpectedly similar to the
rate constant ratios we obtained here (k1/k3 = 3.11 ! 4.6; k2/
k3 = 11.1 ! 20; k4/k3 = 10 ! 10.22 (at P O2 2 atm); as shown in
Tables 3 and 4). The similarity of rate constant ratios suggests that
the reaction mechanism of PX oxidation with CoBr2/cobalt acetate/
MnBr2/manganese acetate catalyst system might be similar to the
reaction mechanism of PX oxidation with Co(OAc)2/Mn(OAc)2/HBr
catalyst system. In addition, the active species of the two catalyst
systems might be similar to each other. It has been proposed that the
Co(OAc)2/Mn(OAc)2/HBr catalyst is not just a single catalyst, but is
composed of a large number of different active catalyst species, i.e.,
different coordination compounds [16]. Partenheimer [16] suggested that at least ve different metal oxidants ([Co(III)], [Co(III)Co(II)], [Co(III)-Mn(II)], [Co(III)-CO(III)], [Co(III)-Mn(III)]), each with
varying amounts of aqua ligands, can be formed from the
homogeneous Co/Mn/Br catalyst during the p-xylene oxidation in
acetic acid.
4. Conclusions
The oxidation of p-xylene (PX) to terephthalic acid was carried
out in acetic acid (HOAc) with the presence of CoBr2-MnBr2
containing catalysts. Br/Co atomic ratio, reactant concentration,
reaction temperature, and oxygen pressure affected catalyst
performances strongly. With the increase of Br/Co atomic ratio,
catalyst activity increased but TA selectivity decreased, therefore,
the optimum Br/Co atomic ratio was around 3. Higher Br
concentration was detrimental to TA yield, which might be due
to the formation of benzylic bromide. The suitable reaction
temperature was 100 8C. Further increase in reaction temperature
resulted in the decrease of catalyst activity, which was also
ascribed to the formation of benzylic bromide. The maximum TA
yield obtained was 93.5%, which occurred at 100 8C, Br/Co atomic
ratio = 3 and PX/HOAc weight ratio = 0.16. The major route for PX
277
References
[1] R.W. Fischer, F. Rohrscheid, in: B. Cornils, W.A. Herrmann (Eds.), Applied
Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds, vol. 1, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2002, pp. 443467.
[2] Y. Chen, J.L. Fulton, W. Partenheimer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 1408514093.
[3] C.M. Park, in: J.K. Kroschwitz, M. Howe-Grant (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Chemical
Technology, vol. 18, Wiley, New York, 1996, pp. 9911043.
[4] B. Saha, J.H. Espenson, J. Mol. Catal. A 271 (2007) 15.
[5] W. Partenheimer, Catal. Today 23 (1995) 69158.
[6] Y. Ishii, S. Sakaguchi, Catal. Today 117 (2006) 105113.
[7] D. Yen, US Patent Appl. 20,030,078,451 (2003).
[8] Y. Kamiya, T. Nakajima, K. Sakoda, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 39 (1966) 22112215.
[9] A.K. Suresh, M.M. Sharma, T. Sridhar, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39 (2000) 39583997.
[10] Y. Cheng, X. Li, L. Wang, Q. Wang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 41564162.
[11] W. Partenhemier, J. Mol. Catal. A 206 (2003) 105119.
[12] W. Partenhemier, J. Mol. Catal. A 275 (2007) 240.
[13] W. Partenhemier, Adv. Synth. Catal. 346 (2004) 297306.
[14] C.G. Hill, An Introduction to Chemical Engineering Kinetics and Reactor Design,
Wiley, New York, 1977.
[15] Q. Wang, X. Li, L. Wang, Y. Cheng, G. Xie, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 261266.
[16] W. Partenhemier, J. Mol. Catal. A 174 (2001) 2933.