Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case 45 Results
Case 45 Results
Case 45 Results
qxd
18/12/06
11:53 AM
Page 1
Results
January 2007
Inside
Case study 45: DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis
Scenario and questions
page 3
Summary of results
page 5
Results in detail
Considering use of a biological DMARD
page 6
page 8
Assessing response to RA
page 10
page 11
Commentaries
Dr Andrew Taylor
page 13
Dr Neil A Hearnden
page 16
page 19
page 22
References
page 26
The information contained in this material is derived from a critical analysis of a wide range of authoritative evidence.
Any treatment decision based on this information should be made in the context of the clinical circumstances of each patient.
Declarations of interest have been sought from all commentators.
Case study 45
DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis
Scenario
Anita, aged 62, has a 15-year history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) characterised by morning stiffness
and widespread symmetrical joint swelling (hands, wrists, feet, elbows, knees and shoulders).
Aurothiomalate injections started by her rheumatologist controlled her symptoms for 10 years. Oral
methotrexate was started 3 years ago with modest response. Leflunomide was added, but ceased
after 3 weeks due to severe skin reaction. Since then, the RA has been reasonably controlled on
escalating doses of oral methotrexate, folic acid and prednisone, with occasional intra-articular
corticosteroids. Paracetamol/codeine 500/30 mg tablets were taken when required. Aspirin
hypersensitivity precluded use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
When Anita was reviewed by her rheumatologist 3 months ago, synovitis was noted (swollen and
tender joints), blood review revealed elevated C-reactive protein (CRP, 41 mg/L), mildly elevated
erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, 22 mm/h), but otherwise normal electrolytes and LFTs. She
received methylprednisolone injection into several joints. Her oral methotrexate dose was increased
to 20 mg every Monday, and prednisone to 15 mg daily. Because of nausea associated with
methotrexate, folic acid was increased to 2.5 mg daily (except Mondays). Sulfasalazine 1 g twice
daily was also added and she continues to take 12 tablets of paracetamol/codeine 500/30 mg when
the pain is severe.
Anita presents today with worsening morning stiffness in her wrists and feet. She is finding
housework more difficult, has not been sleeping well and had to cancel an overseas trip because of
the pain. Synovitis is evident in her metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints, she
has some hair loss and a blood review last month shows further elevation of CRP.
Other current medications are raloxifene 60 mg daily (osteoporosis) and polyvinyl alcohol 3% eye
drops when required (dry eyes).
No
2. What should be monitored during treatment with adalimumab, and how often?
Monitoring parameter
i.
How often?.
_________________________________________________________________________________
ii. ___________________________________________________________________________________
iii. ___________________________________________________________________________________
iv. ___________________________________________________________________________________
3. How should Anitas response to her current RA medications be assessed?
i.
_________________________________________________________________________________
ii. ___________________________________________________________________________________
iii.___________________________________________________________________________________
iv.___________________________________________________________________________________
4. What advice should Anita receive regarding all her current RA medications?
i.
_________________________________________________________________________________
ii. ___________________________________________________________________________________
iii.___________________________________________________________________________________
iv.___________________________________________________________________________________
Summary of results
At the time of publication, 903 responses had been received. Responses from 200 general practitioners
have been compiled for feedback.
Case synopsis
A 62-year-old patient with a 15-year history of rheumatoid arthritis is currently managed on
methotrexate 20 mg every Monday, sulfasalazine 1 g twice daily and prednisone 15 mg daily.
Other medications are folic acid 2.5 mg (daily except Mondays), paracetamol/codeine 500/30 mg
(12 tablets when required for severe pain), occasional intra-articular corticosteroids, raloxifene
(60 mg daily) and polyvinyl alcohol 3% eye drops (when required). Despite current treatment, the
patient presents with worsening disease activity and functional impairment. She is also experiencing
hair loss. (See page 3 for more details.)
conducting a full blood count (87.5%) and liver function tests (79.0%) each month
monitoring for signs of heart failure (61.5%) and pulmonary sepsis (53%) at every visit
screening for tuberculosis (36.5%) and hepatitis B and C (36%) at baseline
screening for reactivated tuberculosis (37%) in the first 25 months of treatment.
Parameters for assessing response to the medications included reduced CRP concentration and/or
erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (92.5%), increased functional status (79.5%), reduced duration
of morning stiffness (68%), reduced number of affected joints (58.5%), and decreased synovitis
(32%).
Advice given to the patient included information about the need for regular monitoring and followup (68%), potential adverse effects and the importance of reporting them (65.5%), the importance
of compliance (17.5%), non-pharmacological therapy (12.5%), correct dosing and proper
administration of medications (11.5%), and specific advice on adalimumab [e.g. informing the patient
that long-term safety is not yet established (11%)].
5
Results in detail
Considering use of a biological DMARD
97.5% of respondents would consider recommending a biological DMARD. Main reasons for this
decision are given in Table 1.
Table 1
Reason for considering use of a biological DMARD
Limitations with current treatment using conventional DMARDs
Inadequate response or no clinical remission (despite high-dose regimen of multiple drugs)
% of respondents*
(n = 195)
95.4
Patient experiencing adverse effects (e.g. hair loss from methotrexate, osteoporosis
probably from corticosteroid use)
15.4
12.3
Laboratory findings
Raised CRP concentration and/or other biological markers
45.6
27.2
26.2
Persistent synovitis
21.5
20.0
Worsening symptoms
13.8
10.8
10.8
Persistent pain
9.2
6.7
4.1
13.8
8.7
6.2
8.7
3.6
3.6
The remaining 2.5% would not consider using a biological DMARD. These respondents suggested
increasing the dose of Anitas existing medications (methotrexate, sulfasalazine) and/or trialling the
addition of other conventional DMARDs (hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide) first. Some were also
concerned about the toxicities and long-term safety of the biological DMARDs.
Practice points
Biological DMARDs should be considered for the treatment of RA if remission is not achieved with the
appropriate use of conventional DMARDs1 or if conventional DMARDs cannot be tolerated.
Combining a biological DMARD with methotrexate provides greater efficacy compared with
methotrexate alone.2-5
The Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits6 lists the criteria for initial PBS-subsidised treatment with a
biological DMARD; Anitas case is worked through as an example in Table 2.
Anitas example
Adult
Severe active RA
leflunomide alone; OR
leflunomide and methotrexate; OR
cyclosporine
If treatment with any of the above-mentioned drugs is contraindicated
according to the TGA-approved product information, or if intolerance of a
severity necessitating permanent treatment withdrawal develops during the
relevant period of use, the patient is exempted from demonstrating an
inadequate response to that particular agent(s) only.
Failure to achieve adequate response indicated by:
ESR > 25 mm/h OR CRP >15 mg/L, AND
9 (CRP 41 mg/L)
9 (probably)
9 (shoulders)
For the purposes of PBS subsidy of biological DMARDs for rheumatoid arthritis, Medicare Australia (personal correspondence, 6
December 2006) has advised that prednisolone at doses of 7.5mg daily is accepted as a DMARD.
This question was interpreted in two ways. Most respondents answered it in terms of monitoring for
the potential toxicities associated with adalimumab these responses are summarised in Table 3.
Some respondents also answered the question with respect to monitoring response to adalimumab
therapy these responses are included in Table 5.
Table 3
Monitoring parameters (frequency of monitoring*)
% of respondents
(n = 200)
Full blood count [FBC] (monthly for first 6 months, then at increased intervals thereafter)
Liver function tests [LFTs] (monthly for first 6 months, then at increased intervals thereafter)
Signs of heart failure or other cardiac abnormalities (at every visit)
Signs of pulmonary sepsis or other lung abnormalities (at every visit)
Reactivated tuberculosis (in the first 25 months of treatment)
Tuberculosis (at baseline)
Hepatitis B and C serology (at baseline)
Chickenpox or shingles serology (if exposed during treatment with adalimumab)
Adverse drug effects and toxicities, e.g. unspecified infections, neurotoxicity (monthly)
Chest X-ray (every 612 months)
Urea, electrolytes and creatinine (monthly)
Injection-site reaction (monthly)
* Only the most common response has been provided
87.5
79.0
61.5
53.0
37.0
36.5
36.0
16.5
12.5
10.5
10.5
7.0
Practice points
The long-term safety of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors such as adalimumab is not yet established7
and careful monitoring for potential toxicity is an essential part of therapy. In Australia, reported adverse
drug reactions involving TNF inhibitors have included pneumonia/lower respiratory tract infections,
lupus or lupus-like syndrome, sepsis, anaphylaxis, lymphoma, tuberculosis and malignant melanoma.8
Monitor for injection-site reaction, a common minor adverse event.9 It may present as mild erythema,
itching, pain or swelling, usually lasts for several days, and rarely leads to cessation of therapy.7
Routine monitoring should include the parameters listed in Table 4. Other rare but serious toxicities to
be aware of include opportunistic infections (e.g. histoplasmosis, listeriosis), lymphoproliferative
disorders, lupus-like syndrome and demyelinating disease.10
Cessation of therapy is recommended if any of the following adverse effects occur while using a
biological DMARD: demyelinating disorders, pancytopaenia, aplastic anaemia, lupus-like syndrome,
worsening heart failure, neoplasia or serious hypersensitivity.10 Temporary cessation of therapy is
recommended in the presence of infection or during surgery/peri-operative period.10
The Australian Rheumatology Association (ARA) patient medicine information sheet for adalimumab
provides a useful summary of the above-mentioned points. A copy is available in Appendix 1* for
photocopying. (ARA patient medicine information sheets for other DMARDs are available from
www.rheumatology.org.au/community/PatientMedicineInformation.htm).
Frequency
Baseline
Tuberculosis screening
*Adapted from NPS News 48: Helping patients achieve remission of rheumatoid arthritis, October 2006
Response parameters
Reduced CRP concentration and/or ESR
92.5
79.5
68.0
58.5
Decreased synovitis
32.0
25.5
25.0
23.0
20.5
Practice points
Assessing response to medications can be based on disease activity. Review disease activity every
13 months until remission is achieved.11 Remission is defined as symptomatic relief, plus
normalisation of inflammatory markers, and the absence of joint swelling.1
Assessing disease activity and response to treatment in RA should include the measures in Box 1.
In addition to disease activity, response to medications should include monitoring of potential adverse
drug reactions (e.g. as discussed in the previous section for adalimumab).
Limitation of function
Duration of fatigue
10
68.0
17.0
65.5
Remind the patient to notify the GP immediately of any signs of infection and/or if feeling unwell
24.5
12.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
11.5
6.5
6.0
4.0
Advice on adalimumab
Inform the patient that long-term safety is not yet established
11.0
Inform the patient about rare toxicities (e.g. tuberculosis, demyelinating disease)
10.5
8.5
5.0
3.5
General
Emphasise the importance of compliance
17.5
Discuss goal and benefits of therapy (e.g. clinical remission, preventing joint damage)
9.5
Inform the patient about potential drug interactions and the importance of notifying health
professionals of use of any new medications
4.5
Practice points
Patient information about the disease and its treatment and outcome forms an important part of
managing RA.11
11
emphasise the importance of regular monitoring and follow-up, and discuss a feasible schedule
and reminder system for doing so.
Practical advice on administration and precautions for adalimumab, methotrexate, sulfasalazine and
prednisolone is provided in Table 7.
The consumer medicine information (CMI) leaflet for each medication also provides useful
information, including the indication, directions for use, precautions and potential adverse reactions.
Many CMIs can also be downloaded from the NPS website at www.nps.org.au/consumers. A copy of
the Humira CMI* for photocopying is included in Appendix 2.
Advice
Adalimumab
Methotrexate
Reassure patients that it is effective and generally well tolerated, if the proper precautions are taken
Dose to be taken once a week prevent confusion by providing written information about dose, day
and time of administration
Dose can be divided into 3 doses given over 24 hours (i.e. at time 0, 12 and 24 hours) if gastrointestinal
adverse effects occur
Folic acid decreases risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects and liver toxicity; give as a single or split dose,
generally not on the same day as methotrexate
Parenteral (subcutaneous or intramuscular) methotrexate is an alternative for patients who cannot
tolerate oral methotrexate
May cause black faecal discolouration
May increase skin sensitivity to sunlight avoid over-exposure and/or use adequate sun protection
Potential toxicities requiring monitoring include myelosuppression, abnormal LFTs, hepatotoxicity,
nephrotoxicity, interstitial pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis
Sulfasalazine
Prednisone
Anita is taking sulfasalazine despite a documented history of aspirin hypersensitivity (of unspecified severity). This scenario is based on
an actual patient who in this case suffered no untoward reaction to sulfasalazine. However, please note that hypersensitivity to
salicylate is listed as a contraindication in the product information for all brands of sulfasalazine.
*Reproduced with permission of Abbott Australasia Pty Ltd
12
Dr Andrew Taylor
Consultant Rheumatologist
Head, Department of Rheumatology
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, WA
Director, Goatcher Clinical Research Unit
Commentary 1
Key points
Management of RA
RA is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease
that causes pain and swelling of joints, ultimately
leading to destruction of the joints and the
surrounding soft tissues. If the inflammation from
RA is unchecked, it may lead to damage of the
joint structures, with resultant loss of function
and disability. In RA the inflammation primarily
affects the joint tissues (synovium) and other
joints, but extra-articular features may also
occur. The peak onset of disease is within the 4th
and 5th decades of life.15 About half a million
Australians suffer from RA.16
Managing Anitas RA
Anita has a long history of RA, which has never
been adequately controlled. She has accumulated
a significant burden of disease, with several
DMARDs proving unsuitable, some because of
lack of efficacy, others because of adverse
events. She presents now with ongoing synovitis
with significant joint pain, aggressive loss of
function, disturbed sleep and elevated
inflammatory markers. The disease is also
beginning to exert a significant effect on her
family life. She also has established osteoporosis
from her chronic RA, long-term prednisolone
therapy and postmenopausal state. She also has
secondary Sjgrens syndrome.
14
regular monitoring
surveillance for infections and
withholding a due injection if febrile or
an infection is present.
seeking prompt medical attention if
febrile or unwell.
Explanation that after 3 months of therapy
efficacy will be assessed and therapy will be
continued only if there has been sufficient
improvement.
After clinical improvement, aiming to
minimise the dosage of prednisolone and in
the medium term considering withdrawing
sulfasalazine but continuing methotrexate
therapy
15
Commentary 2
Dr Neil A Hearnden
Musculoskeletal Medicine Practitioner
Arana Hills Medical Centre
Pine Rivers QLD
Member of Arthritis and Osteoporosis Expert Advisory Committee
Key points
16
Assessing response
Again it appears that there may be an overdependence on blood testing to assess response.
RA is a complex multisystem disease that is not
just diagnosed by a positive rheumatoid factor,
and response is not as simple as seeing
reductions in CRP levels. The Australian
Rheumatology Association protocol involves a
full assessment of global response by a Disease
Activity Score including a 28-joint count
(DAS28).27 This is based on the number of
tender (t28) and swollen joints (sw28) as well as
the patients visual analogue scale (VAS) score of
global disease activity, not just by a simple
haematological marker of inflammation:
17
Further advice
Depression commonly accompanies RA. Psychosocial factors such as loss of paid employment,
18
PATIENT INFORMATION ON
ADALIMUMAB
What is Adalimumab?
Adalimumab (brand name Humira) belongs
to a new class of medicines called biological
disease modifying antirheumatic drugs
(bDMARDs).
These medicines block natural substances
called cytokines, which are found in excessive
amounts in the blood and joints of people with
rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and
ankylosing spondylitis.
The increased levels of cytokines cause
inflammation, which results in symptoms of
pain, joint swelling and stiffness, and can lead
to joint damage.
Other diseases:
Surgery:
Vaccines:
The information in this sheet has been obtained from various sources and has been reviewed by the Australian Rheumatology Association.
It is intended as an educational aid and does not cover all possible uses, actions, precautions, side effects, or interactions of the medicines
mentioned. This information is not intended as medical advice for individual problems nor for making an individual assessment of the risks
and benefits of taking a particular medicine. It can be reproduced in its entirety but cannot be altered without permission from the ARA.
HUMIRA
Adalimumab
chest tightness
31 July 2006
Page 1 of 4
Humira
Version 02
31 July 2006
Page 2 of 4
Patient/Health
Professional/Caregiver
Using cotton wool or a piece of
gauze, apply pressure over the
injection site for 10 seconds.
A little bleeding may occur.
Do not rub the injection site.
Use a band-aid if you want to.
Humira
Version 02
31 July 2006
Side effects
Check with your doctor as soon
as possible if you have any
problems while using Humira,
even if you do not think the
problems are connected with the
medicine or are not listed in this
leaflet.
Like all medicines, Humira can
cause some side effects.
Ask your doctor or pharmacist
any questions you may have.
Tell your doctor if you notice any
of the following:
Upper
respiratory
infections
Headache
Rash
tract
Page 3 of 4
Product description
What it looks like
Severe rash
Swollen face
Trouble breathing
Humira
Version 02
31 July 2006
Ingredients
Active ingredient:
40 mg adalimumab
Other ingredients:
Mannitol
Citric acid monohydrate
Sodium citrate
Monobasic sodium phosphate
dihydrate
Dibasic sodium phosphate
dihydrate
Sodium chloride
Polysorbate 80
Water for injections
Distributor
Humira is distributed in Australia
by:
Abbott Australasia Pty Ltd
ABN 95 000 180 389
32-34 Lord St
Botany NSW 2019
Humira is distributed
Zealand by:
in
New
Version 02
Page 4 of 4
References
1.
2.
Blumenauer B, Judd M, Wells G, et al. Infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2002; 3:CD003785.
3.
Blumenauer B, Judd M, Cranney A, et al. Etanercept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;3:CD004525.
4.
Clark W, Jobanputra P, Barton P, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of anakinra for the
treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults: a systematic review and economic analysis. 2004.
http://www.ncchta.org/fullmono/mon818.pdf (accessed 22 November, 2006).
5.
6.
Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits for Approved Pharmacists and Medical Practitioners (from 1 Dec
2006). Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006.
7.
Lu TY-T, Hill C. Managing patients taking tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Australian Prescriber
2006;29:67-70.
8.
Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee. Tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors. Australian
Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin 2006;25:23.
9.
Scott DL, Kingsley GH. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med
2006;355:704-12.
10. Australian Rheumatology Association. A practical guide for the use of biologic agents in the
treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. APLAR J Rheumatol 2006;9:123-6.
11. Combe B, Landew R, Lukas C, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis:
report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies
Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2006; published online first: 5 January 2006.
doi:10.1136/ard.2005.044354.
12. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines. Guidelines
for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:328-46.
13. Rossi S, ed. Australian Medicines Handbook. Adelaide: Australian Medicines Handbook, 2006.
14. Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Australian Pharmaceutical Formulary and Handbook. 20th edn.
Canberra: Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, 2006.
15. Ledingham J, Deighton C. Update on the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for prescribing
TNF blockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (update of previous guidelines of April 2001).
Rheumatol 2005;44:157-63.
16. Access Economics Pty Limited. Arthritis the bottom line. The economic impact of arthritis in
Australia. Arthritis Australia, 2005. http://arthritisaustralia.com.au/media/file/Arthritis%20%20The%20Bottom%20Line_final.pdf (accessed 6 December, 2006).
17. Wassenberg S, Rau R, Steinfeld P, et al. Very low-dose prednisolone in early rheumatoid arthritis
retards radiographic progression over two years: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3371-80.
NPS is an independent, non-profit organisation for Quality Use of Medicines
funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.
ABN 61 082 034 393 | Level 7/418A Elizabeth Street Surry Hills 2010 | PO Box 1147 Strawberry Hills 2012
Phone: 02 8217 8700 | Fax: 02 9211 7578 | email: info@nps.org.au | web: www.nps.org.au
26
18. Mann D, McMurray J, Packer M, et al. Targeted anticytokine therapy in patients with chronic heart
failure: results of the Randomized Etanercept Worldwide Evaluation (RENEWAL). Circulation
2004;109:1594-602.
19. Cole J, Busti A, Kazi S. The incidence of new onset congestive heart failure and heart failure
exacerbation in Veterans Affairs patients receiving tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists.
Rheumatol Int 2006;online first:doi:10.1007/s00296-006-0215-3.
20. Hochberg M, Silman A, Smolen J, et al. Rheumatology. 3rd edn: Mosby Inc; 2003.
21. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2001 National Health Survey: summary of results. ABS Cat. No.
4364.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2002.
22. Wolfe F, Mitchell D, Sibley J, et al. The mortality of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum
1994;37:481-94.
23. Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson C. The burden of disease and injury in Australia. AIHW Cat. No. PHE 17.
Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1999.
24. Britt H, Miller G, Knox S, et al. General practice activity in Australia 200304. AIHW Cat. No. GEP16.
Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2004.
25. Abbott Australasia. Humira product information. 25 October 2005.
26. Burger A, Burger M, Aronson D. New therapies for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Drugs
of Today 2002;38:31-48.
27. Van Riel P. Disease Activity Score. http://www.das-score.nl/www.das-score.nl/how_to_use1.html
(accessed 2006, 23 November).
28. National Cancer Institute. Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) Trial. 2006.
http://www.cancer.gov/star (accessed 23 November, 2006).
29. Mosekilde L, Vestergaard P, Langdahl B. Fracture prevention in postmenopausal women. In: Clinical
Evidence. BMJ Publishing Group Limited, 2006.
http://www.clinicalevidence.com/ceweb/conditions/msd/1109/1109_I9.jsp (accessed 23 November,
2006).
30. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine for Treatment of Depression,
Osteoarthritis, and Liver Disease Summary. AHRQ Pub. No. 02-E033.
http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/samesum.pdf. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality; 2002.
31. Najm W, Reinsch S, Hoehler F, et al. S-Adenosyl methionine (SAMe) versus celecoxib for the
treatment of osteoarthritis symptoms: a double-blind cross-over trial [ISRCTN36233495]. BMC
Musculoskeletal Disorders 2004;5:doi:10.1186/471-2474-5-6.
27