Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1) Design and Analysis 2) Fabrication 3) Assembly
1) Design and Analysis 2) Fabrication 3) Assembly
2) Fabrication
3) Assembly
After the assembly, analysis was done and the scooter was subjected to
forces to ascertain that the product holds true to the calculations and to
confirm the completion of a successful product. A user study was also
conducted for the sake of recommendations and suggestions.
Objective
To design and fabricate a Kick Scooter for a human of average weight which is to
be used in acceptable riding conditions.
DELIVERABLES
Ideally, one fully assembled and ready to use Kick Scooter
prototype.
Division of Parts
Handle Bar
Steering Column (T-Rod)
Pivoting Mechanism (Bearings)
Deck/Baseboard
Wheels
Joints (Welding)
Fasteners (Bolts and Nuts)
Breakdown
Phase 1
Designing
Material Selections
Analytical Calculations
Iterative Process
Modeling on a CAD software
Phase 2
Fabrication
Acquiring required material
Fabricating each part according to design requirements
Phase 3
Assembly
Assembling the already fabricated parts
Scooter Operation
The rider places hands on the handle bars and the inside foot on the deck for stability
To propel the scooter, the rider pushes off with the outside foot and repeats this step until desired
speed is reached
The rider then lifts the outside foot off the ground and either lets it hover in the air or rests on the
deck along with the inside foot until more speed is desired
In order to stop, the rider either jumps, runs, or walks off the deck of the scooter applies break.
Requirements
The following requirements are to be fulfilled:
Safe
Low cost
Portable/Collapsible
Selected stainless steel as building material on the basis of strength and durability.
The height of the scooter should at least be around 90 cm
The scooter width should be wide enough for a person to stand on (approx width 11 cm)
A person with no more than 100kg of weight will use the scooter
The scooter is intended for use on solid, flat, clean and dry surfaces such as pavement or level
BASE FRAME
Design
This design of frame was selected after considering market availability and
extensive research.
For simplification, we shall use constant cross-section
We will start with stiffness based design and later check for strength.
Force on one beam will be
P=
100 x 9.81
2
Schem
atic
S.F.D
B.M.D
Deflect
ion
x =
Pl
48 El
I = Pl3/48E x
E = 200 GPa
P = 490.5 N
L = 0.545 m
x = 0.00 15 m
Putting values
= 5.5139 X 10-4m4
Of the available materials, the hollow rectangular tube we could find had
I
= 7.3 X 10-9m4
With dimensions
b
= 13 mm 0.2 mm
h
= 24 mm 0.2 mm
t
= 1.5 mm 0.1 mm
Total Length = 54.5 cm 2 mm
And generally
For this,
= 1.1 mm
As
Analysis
Now,
We check for strength.
Maximum moment
= 245.35 N x 0.565/2 m
= 69.28 Nm
bending (max)
My
l
= 113.89 MPa
When no load is applied
min
FIG 7
Se,
=0
de = 0.0142
Kb = 1.24d-0.107
= 0.933
As bending
3) Kc = 1
4) Kd = 1 (room temperature)
5) Ke = 0.897 (90 percent reliability)
6) Kf = 1
So,
Se= KaKbKcKdKeKfSe
Se= 183 MPA
1
nf =
+
Se Sut
nf = 2.36 (safe)
FEM Analysis
The design of the base frame was checked on fem to make sure that the base would not
fail or deform beyond limit. As the fem analysis show that the maximum deformation
would be 0.16 mm and maximum stress would be 34 MPa, so we are safe. The difference
in the theoretical calculations and the fem analysis is due to the extra bar we used to
make
the
deck
strong
and
rigid.
T TUBE
Design
Using a factor of safety of 2
Sy = 215 MPa
Allowable Stress = 215/2 = 107.5 MPa
Where,
I=
64
My
l
(dout4 din4)
We get
dout = 0.02937 m
Available size,
dout = 3.05 cm 0.15 mm
Schem
atic
=
My
l
= 121 MPA
S.F.D
n = 215/121 = 1.77
Let F = 200 N
B.M.D
P=
= F/A
= 1.11 MPA << 251 MPa
So our material of rod is safe.
Analyzing Fatigue
m = (max + min)/2
m = 60.5 MPa
a =| max - min |/2
a = 60.5 MPa
Se = 0.5 Sut
Se = 252.5 MPa
Se= KaKbKcKdKeKfSe
a) Ka = 0.8646
b)
Kb = 1.24d-0.107
Not applicable since d< 2.79
c) Kc = 1
d) Kd = 1
e) Ke = 0.814 (99 percent reliability)
Se = 177.7 MPa
Using Goodman criteria we get factor of safety
nf =
+
Se Sut
Handle
To comfortably fit the handle in hand we selected a hollow rod with an outer
diameter of 4.5 cm and an inner diameter of 3.7 cm.
F = V = 200 N
M = Fx = 172 Nm
And
I=
64
(dout4 din4)
C = 0.0225 m
Also
= VQ/It
= 6.561526 MPa
= ( x2 + 3 2xy)1/2
= 37.189 MPa
First checking for static failure.
n = Sy/37.189
n = 5.78 (safe)
TIRE
The tires have been selected solely on the basis that these tires are used in
commercial scooters. They are made of a material known as Urethane. Urethane
is a polymer often found, quite literally, at our feet. An important component in
D nD 60
R nR 60
1
3
103
F D =200 N =.2 kN
D=desirelifehours =20000 hrs
n D = desired
rev
min
As it is a manual scooter (no electrical motor is used) so its rpm will be small.
rev
n D =50
min
C10=0.2
20000 50 60 13
=7.829
103
From ABMA standard boundary dimension data, we selected a bearing with outer
diameter 35.1mm but available size was 45.4mm also our shaft/rod dia is
30.5mm so to allow the free rotation of rod and to provide tolerances we used
the available bearing of 45.4mm outer dia.
Hence,
Analysis of Bearing
dia out =4.54 cm
=4.
dia =4.28 cm
Bearing stress area =
=1.801
cm 2
P=200N (total)
On bearing
P= 200 sin 30=100 N
Bearing stress=
P
100
= =
A 1.801 104
= 0.5MPa (safe)
A=1.801
cm 2
V max =200 N
max =
V
=1.1 MPa
A
AXLE BOLTS
(safe)
=4.54 cm
These bolts are selected and purchased on the basis of strength and load bearing
capacity. They are not specifically designed. They are selected as best fits and other
design considerations.
Specifications
Approximate Load
Load: 981 N
Front Axle Bolt
Length: 9.5 cm
Dia: 0.7 cm
Rear Axle Bolt:
Length: 11.56 cm
Dia: 0.7 cm
Material:
AISI Type 304 Stainless Steel
Bolts x 2 (Keeping in
place the T-Tube & Deck
together)
Design
Vshear = 981 N
There is also moment associated with it
r=
5.25
2
cm = 2.625 cm
F =
Vshear
2
F =
Mr
4 r2
981
2
N = 490.5 N
= 2620 N
Fa = 2987 N
Fb = 2299 N
If we choose SAE grade 5 bolts, then
F
As
Since As = r2
r=(
F
Sallow
)1/2
r = 2.43 mm
Hence we need two bolts having
Minor diameter = 5 mm
Bolt Length between members = 45 mm
(necessity)
Nut Height = 10 mm (from table)
Total bolt length = 45 mm + 10 mm + Clearance =
65 mm
Members Analysis
Bearing stress area = td = 5(15) = 75mm2
Stress =
F
Ab
2987
75
So, our design is safe as we had already checked for bending of the base.
Note
Due to practical constraints we selected one bolt of the specified diameter and
another one of a large diameter of 7.5 mm, it will only add to strength.
WELDING
= V/A
Weight = (100 x 9.8) = 980 N
From Table (9-1) Shigley
= Mc/I
c = 0.75 cm
I = 7.3 x 10-9 m4
M = 980 x 4.35 x 10-2 Nm
M = 42.63 Nm
So = 43.79 MPa
= V/A
= 980/130.8
= 74.923 k Pa
Von Mises Stress
= (2 + 32)1/2
= 43.29 MPa
As Sy for stainless steel = 215 MPa
< 215 MPa
So the design is safe.
Considering it as a single bead bearing a load of 1000N we see that
V
A
1000
throat area
Throat Area=
= 4.242
=
0.707 1 10 6 10
104 m2
1000
=2.35 MPa
4
4.242 10
max
BRAKES
Purchased from market after checking compatibility.