SCHOOL PERFORMANCE REPORT CARD

SY 2011-2012
Agana Heights Elementary School
Superintendent of Education Jon J.P. Fernandez
SY 2011-2012 Interim Superintendent Taling Taitano
Principal Evangeline Q. San Nicolas

SCHOOL
CHARACTERISTICS

STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS

ENROLLMENT

539

AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE

471.05%
503.42%
93.58%

AVERAGE DAILY MEMBERSHIP

AVERAGE DAILY RATES

ADDITIONAL
DEMOGRAPHIC
INFORMATION

STUDENT ETHNIC DISTRIBUTION

STUDENT ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

KINDER

1ST

2ND

3RD

4TH

5TH

63

80

94

144

71

87

CNMI
1%

PI
3%

ASIAN
0% WHITE
NON
0%
OTHER
0%

FIL
0%

ENGLISH
LEARNERS

26%

FREE &
REDUCED
LUNCH

52%

STUDENTS
ELIGIBLE TO
RECEIVE
SPECIAL
EDUCATION
SERVICES

CHA
96%

STUDENT
SUSPENSION
RATE

6%

2.16%

CURRICULUM/RESOURCES INFORMATION
School Personnel Resources
POSITION
ADMINISTRATORS
TEACHERS
SUPPORT/STAFF
SHC
PROFESSIONAL / ANC
CUSTODIAL
INST. AIDES
TOTAL

NO. OF EMPLOYEES
1
36
12
1
0
2
0
52

% OF TOTAL

ATTENDANCE RATE

ABSENTEE RATE

2
69
23
2
0
4
0
100

96
94
86
96
0
56
0
90

4
6
14
4
0
44
0
10

FROM THE PRINCIPAL

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

70% of Reading Wings Students met expected growth

47% of Reading Roots Students met expected growth
97% of Kinder Students met expected growth
83% of 1st Grade students are reading at or above grade level
67% of 2nd grade student reading at or above grade level
77% of 3rd grade students reading at or above grade level
59% of 4th grade students reading at or above grade level
74% of 5th grade students reading at or above grade level

SPECIAL PROJECTS

FA Reform Program
SPED
ESL
GATE

Chamorro
DEED
After-School Tutorial

ACTIVITIES

SAT 10 Awards Ceremony

Quarterly Awards Ceremony
Spelling Bee
Big Bird Read-Athon
SFA Parent and Family
Involvement Quarterly 2nd
Cup of Coffee
Isla Art-Athon

BMI (Body Mass Index)

School Spring Carnival
Rainbows for All Children
Rai Yan Raina
Box Top For Education

AWARDS

SCHOOL- WIDE EXPENDITURES Note: Unaudited data as of 10.23.12

Salaries
Benefits
Travel
Contractual
OBJECT
CATEGORY
Supplies / Materials
Equipment
Utilities
Capital Outlay
PROGRESS: ARE STUDENTS MAKING SUFFICIENT PROGRESS?

$2,168,135.08
$778,234.55
-0$102,302.74
$6,648.04
-0$246,840.06
-0-

The school continued to monitor and review the effectiveness of the SFA Program during PLCs by analyzing data, and collaborating
with colleagues on the strengths and weaknesses of the program to better improve instructional strategies for all students to succeed in
the program.
To maximize instructional time and provide common planning time for teachers, PLC was established by the schools Reform
Program. To implement the program with fidelity, it was required for the school to have PLCs scheduled throughout the school year.
PLC was developed and designed to meet the needs of the Grade Level and Reform Program. Therefore, PLC meets by Grade Levels,
SFA Reading Wings and Roots, SFA Writing and Math as scheduled on the schools calendar.

ENVIRONMENT: IS THE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT SUPPORTING STUDENTS, TEACHERS, and FAMILIES?

School holds a quarterly Second Cup of Coffee a program designed to give the school the opportunity to meet and visit with parents in
an informal way when dropping off their children. This program establishes and maintains a positive home-school relationship.
The Solutions Network Committee is made up of a team of teachers working together to discuss school goals, areas of concern, and plan
for accomplishing goals and addressing concerns.
The Solutions Network Committee is made up of a team of teachers working together to discuss school goals, areas of concern, and plan
for accomplishing goals and addressing concerns.
Getting Along Together is a school-wide program designed to promote and enhance the development of a childs social skills so that the
child will develop into a peaceful, productive, and creative thinking individual.
The Class Council Meetings is a powerful tool in creating an atmosphere where students support and encourage each other in
implementing problem-solving strategies and communication skills.

OUTCOMES: WHAT STUDENTS ARE ACCOMPLISHING?

All through SY 2011-2012 AHES had concentrated on a Goal Focused Achievement plan for progress towards a year-end goal to increase the
number of students reading at or above grade level from Baseline Data to the End of the School Year. Teachers collected data, analyzed their
data at scheduled PLC meetings and put classrooms interventions in place. The principal and facilitator observed classroom for the identified
achievement plan interventions and collection of data.

The results of that data is at Baseline 66.89% of our students were reading at or above grade level as reported on the SFA Grade
Summary Form. By the end of the school year 72.47% of students were reading at or above grade level as reported on the SFA Grade
Summary Form. That is an increase of 5.58%
The results of that data is at Baseline 72% of our students were mastering writing as reported on the SFA Writing Mastery Database.
By the end of the school year 80% of students were mastering writing as reported on the SFA Writing Mastery Database. That is an
increase of 8%

All through SY 2011-2012 AHES had concentrated on a Goal Focused Achievement plan for progress towards a year-end goal to increase the
number of students achieving mathematics mastery from Baseline Data to the End of the School Year. Teachers collected data, analyzed their
data at scheduled PLC meetings and put classrooms interventions in place. The principal and facilitator observed classroom for the identified
achievement plan interventions and collection of data.
The results of that data is at Baseline 51% of our students were mastering mathematics as reported on the SFA Mathematics Mastery Database.
By the end of the school year 65% of students were mastering mathematics as reported on the SFA Mathematics Mastery Database. That is an
increase of 14%

The SAT10 performance standards are content-referenced scores that reflect what students know and should be able to do in given
subject areas. As a norm-referenced test, student scores are compared to the performance of a norm group, comprised of a national
sample.

Performance Levels
Level 3, Proficient
Level 4, Advanced

Represents solid academic performance indicating students are prepared for the next grade
Signifies superior performance beyond grade-level mastery

1ST GRADE

2ND GRADE

Source: SAT 10

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

1011
RD
ADV. 9%

1112
RD
1%

1011
MA
2%

1112
MA
7%

1011
LA
4%

11- 10- 1112 11 12

LA SPL SPL
10% 53% 44%

1011
Env
2%

1112
Env
4%

1011
LIS
0%

1112
LIS
14%

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

1011
RD
ADV. 3%

3RD GRADE

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

1011
RD
ADV. 6%

1011
MA
5%

1112
MA
4%

1011
LA
0%

1112
LA
0%

10- 1111 12
SPL SPL
34% 30%

1011
Env
0%

1112
Env
3%

1011
LIS
0%

1112
LIS
1%

PROF 19% 20% 16% 21% 7% 5% 21% 27% 0% 21% 0% 17%

4TH GRADE

PROF 59% 40% 37% 35% 21% 15% 12% 24% 25% 29% 0% 25%

1112
RD
1%

1112
RD
4%

1011
MA
6%

1112
MA
8%

1011
LA
4%

1112
LA
6%

10- 11- 1011 12 11

SPL SPL Env
17% 24% 13%

1112
Env
9%

1011
LIS
1%

1112
LIS
4%

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

1011
RD
ADV. 6%

1011
MA
8%

1112
MA
3%

1011
LA
6%

1112
LA
5%

10- 11- 1011 12 11

SPL SPL Env
21% 11% 14%

1112
Env
2%

1011
LIS
6%

1112
LIS
3%

PROF 32% 21% 31% 27% 29% 24% 40% 29% 23% 23% 27% 23%

5TH GRADE

PROF 14% 25% 28% 25% 14% 22% 25% 25% 34% 8% 20% 18%

1112
RD
5%

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

1011
RD
ADV. 0%

1112
RD
2%

1011
MA
2%

1112
MA
5%

1011
LA
2%

1112
LA
7%

10- 1111 12
SPL SPL
12% 16%

1011
Env
1%

1112
Env
5%

1011
LIS
0%

1112
LIS
4%

PROF 14% 34% 16% 24% 12% 24% 34% 36% 23% 32% 16% 25%

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT 17GCA Chapter 3, 3106(b)(6) Comprehensive Testing Program (CTP)

PERFORMANCE CLASSIFICATION
SAT10 Proficient & Advanced Levels
SAT10 Grade 1 Reading
SAT10 Grade 1 Math
SAT10 Grade 1 Language
SAT10 Grade 2 Reading
SAT10 Grade 2 Math
SAT10 Grade 2 Language
SAT10 Grade 3 Reading
SAT10 Grade 3 Math
SAT10 Grade 3 Language
SAT10 Grade 4 Reading
SAT10 Grade 4 Math
SAT10 Grade 4 Language
SAT10 Grade 5 Reading
SAT10 Grade 5 Math
SAT10 Grade 5 Language

School Data
41%
42%
45%
21%
25%
5%
29%
33%
28%
26%
30%
29%
35%
29%
31%

P.L. 26-26 Grade Classification

Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Unacceptable
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low

5th grade Promotion Rate

Student Discipline/ Suspension Rate
Employee Attendance Rate
School Improvement Plan

100%
2.16%
90%
100%

Exceptional
Exceptional
Satisfactory
Exceptional

COMPOSITE SCORE / GRADE

60.59%

Satisfactory

Principal

School Administrators
Evangeline Q. San Nicolas, Ed. D.

PTO Officers
President
Vice President
Secretary
Treasurer
PIO

Mark Mendiola
Teri Perez
Geri Eclavea

Assures that all students are granted the fullest possible educational opportunities;
Heightens the students concerns and awareness of themselves and others;
Encourages students to strive for excellence and to be productive citizens;
Strives for school, home, and community partnerships.
Accreditation Status
Not Accredited

School Colors
Blue & Yellow

Mascot
Bumble Bee