Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GRASPS Examples
GRASPS Examples
Audience:
Situation:
You need to. show the difference between a balanced diet and an unhealthy diet.
The goal is to create a menu for the 3-day trip to the Outdoor Ed. Center.
Role:
Audience:
peers)
Situation:
You need to propose a nutrtionally-balanced and tasy menu, within budfget, for
3 days of camping by the entire class.
Product/Performance and Purpose:
Menu plan for three days, including the 3 main meals and 3 snacks (a.m., p.m.,
and
campfire).
Letter to the director explaining how your menu meets the USDA nutritional guid
elines. Include a chart showing a breakdown of the fat, protein, carbohydrates,
vitamins,
minerals, and calories. Explain how you made it as tasty as possible.
Standards & Criteria for Success:
Situation:
Audience:
Your job is ____________________________________________________________________
____
Audience:
in order to ____________________________________________________________________
_____
so that ________________________________________________________________________
____
Standards & Criteria for Success:
4
accurate
appropriate
apt
clear
convincing
correct
elegant
empathetic
entertaining
justified
4informative insightful novel
organized
creative
perceptive
persuasive
polished
precise
proficient
reflective
responsive revealing
sensitive
ed
4
thorough
well-crafted
understandable
unique
valid
verified
other: ________________________
so that:
the museum visitors better understand the dangers
and hardships and of pioneer life on the prairie
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
page 6
defensible
effective
skilled
sophisticated
effi
su
4convinc accurate
appropriate
apt clear
4
ing
correct
creative
defensible effective
efficient
elegant
empathetic
entertaining
justified
informative
insightful
novel
organized
4
perceptive
persuasive
polished
precise
proficient
reflective
responsive revealing
sensitive
ed
4
thorough
well-crafted
understandable
unique
valid
verified
other: ________________________
so that:
another experimenter can follow your procedure
and determine the most effective detergent for
removing each stain
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
page 7
skilled
sophisticated
su
4
empathize with
imagine
4compare
critique
debate
evaluate
shift perspective
test
consider the various views
Apply
create
construct
de-bug
4design
demonstrate
decide
guide
use
perform
propose
coach
solve
why/how/that/the/of...
the suffering and the courage of
the pioneers
Explain
Interpret
analyze
illustrate
4reveal
make sense of...
represent
show
interpret
Self
Assess
connect
4 inform
teach
describe explain
prove
persuade
show
justify
Shift
Perspective
when they can:
Empathize
and AUDIENCES =
curator
museum goer
neighbor
newscaster
novelist
nutritionist
panelist
parent
park ranger
pen pal
photographer
pilot
playwright
poet
policeman/woman
pollster
radio listener
reader
reporter
researcher
reviewer
sailor
school official
scientist
ships captain
social scientist
social worker
statistician
storyteller
student
taxi driver
teacher
t.v. viewer
tour guide
trainer
travel agent
traveler
t.v./movie
character
tutor
viewer
visitor
website designer
zoo keeper
page 9
debate
story
other: _______________
test
web site
other: _______________
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
Visual
advertisement
banner
cartoon
collage
computer graphic
data display
design
diagram
diorama
display
drawing
filmstrip
flyer
game
graph
map
model
Power Point show
photograph
questionnaire
painting
poster
scrapbook
sculpture
slide show
storyboard
videotape
web site
page 10
A performance task
o
Requires transfer i.e. a repertoire of knowledge and skill to be used w
isely and
effectively in a new situation - i.e. used with understanding
o
Asks students to do the subject, not just recall and plug in discrete lea
rning, out
of context
o
Is set in a novel situation, with little or no scaffolding or cues prov
ided: the student
has to think through what the task demands as part of the assessment (the game
vs. the scaffolded and simplified drills)
o
should be as realistic as possible, in which students confront the same
kinds of challenges, constraints, and options found in the real world
A task, like any other aspect of STAGE 2, is meant to yield evidence of key ele
ments in
Stage 1; it is not meant to be a learning activity: validity is the primary conc
ern, not whether it is interesting or fun as a task.
Writing the task in GRASPS form makes it likely that the task will involve auth
entic transfer: give the student a Goal, a Role, an Audience, a Setting, Perform
ance/product demands,
and a set of Standards and criteria by which work will be judged.
The goal is sufficient evidence for each student. Any group component to a task
should be
matched by evidence about the individuals understanding. This can be accomplished
by
having separate parts to the task (such as a separate sub-task in which roles an
d perspective
change e.g. from group design team to solo reviewer) or by quizzes and prompts g
iven to
each student (and put in Other Evidence) that assess for the same goals.
Dont end up unwittingly assessing for evidence unrelated to your goals. Keep ask
ing the
2-question validity test and its implications: can the task be done well without u
nderstanding? Can the task be done poorly by someone with deep understanding? Th
en, the
task will not yield valid evidence, by definition. Be especially careful of dema
nding a mode
or method of assessment that favors some student ability over others in ways tha
t are not at
the heart of your goals, e.g. you end up assessing - unfairly - writing ability
or multimedia
facility instead of understanding of the subject.
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
page 14
Make sure that you identify valid criteria for scoring that suit the transfer g
oals and
understandings, not just the particulars of the performance tasks (e.g. if the S
tandard
involves causes and effects of the Civil War, score causal reasoning and insight of
historical analysis not just high-quality museum display)
Other Evidence (quizzes, tests, prompts, observations, dialogues, etc.):
Identify the specific questions related to key knowledge and skill goals from S
tage 1 that
you expect students to be able to answer upon completion of this unit.
Typical tests, quizzes, and homework belong in this box: discrete and uncomplic
ated assessment of skills and factual knowledge that isnt otherwise assessed in t
he performance
tasks.
Supplement all your performance tasks, as needed, to get more reliable and vari
ed evidence
of understanding, knowledge, and skill for each individual student. This is espe
cially important if you claim that this unit addresses a Standard in an in-depth
way, and the performance tasks are basically group projects. You need evidence
for each student, ultimately.
The goal is a photo album, not a single snapshot, for the assessments in the uni
t to be both valid and
reliable.
Dont confuse assessment evidence with giving grades. Just because you plan to a
it doesnt mean you will give a grade to it. Nor does the assessment score need to t
ranslate mechanically into a grade. If the task is difficult and new for students,
then grade
accordingly; if the point of the assessment is more for feedback, then dont make
it a grade
for achievement, only process and effort, etc. This is not to say: dont give grad
es. It is to
say: dont confuse feedback to students with the separate act of giving grades. [Local
grading policy may be in need for discussion and revision as a separate issue.]
Wiggins & McTighe 2008
page 15