Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Ang Tek Lian vs CA

G.R. No. L-2516


September 25, 1950
Ang Tek Lian vs. Court of Appeals
FACTS: Knowing he had no funds therefor, petitioner Ang Tek Lian drew a check upon
the China Banking Corporation for the sum of P4,000, payable to the order of cash. He
delivered it to Lee Hua Hong in exchange for money which the latter handed in the act.
The next business day, the check was presented by Lee Hua Hong to the drawee bank
for payment, but it was dishonored for insufficiency of funds, the balance of the deposit of
Ang Tek Lian on both dates being P335 only.
Petitioner was sued for estafa. In his defense, however, he argues that as the check had
been made payable to cash and had not been endorsed by Ang Tek Lian, the defendant
is not guilty of the offense charged.
ISSUE: WON a check payable to cash needs indorsement?
HELD: NO. Under the Negotiable Instruments Law (sec. 9 [d], a check drawn payable to
the order of cash is a check payable to bearer, and the bank may pay it to the person
presenting it for payment without the drawers indorsement. Where a check is made
payable to the order of cash, the word cash does not purport to be the name of any
person, and hence the instrument is payable to bearer. The drawee bank need not obtain
any indorsement of the check, but may pay it to the person presenting it without any
indorsement.

ANG TEK LIAN V. CA


87 PHIL 383
FACTS:
Knowing he had insufficient funds, Ang Tek Lian issued a check for P4000,
payable to cash. This was given to Lee Hua Hong in exchange for
cash. Upon presentment of the check, it was dishonored for having
insufficient funds. It is argued that the check, being payable to cash, wasnt

indorsed by the defendant, and thus, isnt guilty of the crime charged.

HELD:
A check drawn to the order of cash is payable to bearer, and the
bank may pay it to the person presenting it for payment without the
drawers indorsement. Of course, if the bank is not sure of the bearers
identity or financial solvency, it has the right to demand for
identification and/or
assurance against possible complicationsfor instance, forgery of the
drawers signature, loss of the check by the rightful owner, raising the
amount payable, etc. The bank therefore, requires for its protection that the
indorsement of the draweror some other persons known to itbe
obtained. A check payable to bearer is authority for payment to the
holder. Where a check is in the ordinary form and is payable to bearer so
that no indorsement is required, a bank to which it is presented for
payment need not have the holder identified, and is not negligent in failing to
do so.

You might also like