Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Price Paper
What Price Paper
What Price Paper
Key
Red - claim
Orange - evidence
Yellow - stats
Green - Any quotes
Notes - Paper production is harmful to the environment. It can cause pollution
and can cause smoke. It pollutes land and water. And paper mills cost a lot of
money to create.
If humans are to find peace on this earth they must seek peace among
themselves and examine their relationship with all life. The Anishinabe people
of Sagkeeng (mouth of the river) have been relocated, expropriated,
exploitated, discriminated against, impoverished and isolated in order to
accommodate industries wreaking havoc on all life in the region. From hydro
development to pulp and paper manufacturing, industrial activities have
polluted the air, land and water, and the effects will be seen for many
generations to come.
Since time immemorial the Ojibway people of Sagkeeng have occupied and
cared for the region; offering respect to their ancestors and caring dutifully
for those yet to be born. Primarily a hunting and gathering agrarian society
with highly developed systems of trade, commerce and governance over
local and territorial affairs, the Ojibway Nation flourished. Our original
concepts and philosophy of life were challenged and overrun by a new
outlook that came with LaVerendrye and company, in approximately 1769.
Our visitors fled famine, religious persecution, war and pestilence to find
refuge in this rich, new land. In their view they had found an abundance of
riches to be claimed, exploited and taken by force. In short order, life
changed in the region. Some of the original inhabitants were recruited to
participate in an economy based on resource extraction rather than their
traditional independent communal living. Although met with considerable
resistance, little, if any, of the native world view and practices were
incorporated or considered in the new world. Anishinabe religious practices
were prohibited, forcing native spirituality underground and deepening
resentment between native and non-native peoples.
Today the impact of short-term gain and limited long-term vision has had a
considerable effect upon human and other life in the area. Industrial activity
has had disastrous effect on the forests, rivers and on the air quality formerly
enjoyed by all the people residing in the Ojibway Nation's territory. The
spiritual, mental and physical well-being of human and other life forms have
Union members vote this June to accept or reject these terms. A few months
ago UPIU members voted out their president, Chris Christenson, who
persistently raised questions about the deal. Richard Papineau, another
defeated executive member, had also been working with the Sagkeeng
community which had its own reservations about the buy-out.
Workers in this small company town, are so anxious about their jobs that until
now most have been deaf to criticisms of the deal.
But Christenson and Papineau are challenging the provincial government and
their own international union for incompetence. "The membership may vote
the deal down," Christenson told CD. "It's a scam. Abitibi refused to consider
any other buyer except Fern Pitre and the management group. The union
offered to go partners with Abitibi, but they showed no interest. We think that
after the new treatment and recycling plants are built and paid for with our
foregone wages, Abitibi-Price could well buy the company back. That's
probably what Pitre and Ashok Narang are counting on."
Sagkeeng has been offered a seat on the new company's board of directors,
but so far has refused.
Since going to press with this article a few events have occurred at the Pulp
and Paper Mill in Pine Falls, Manitoba. In late March a chemical spill released a
ton of Buzan-52 into the Winnipeg River, just upstream from Sagkeeng First
Nation. The toxic spill was not reported until three days later - a clear
violation of the Pulp and Paper Effluent Act. As a result, the community of
Sagkeeng took to the streets in protest, both in the town of Pine Falls and at
the Legislative Building in Winnipeg. These actions drew national media
attention to the problems the community has experienced because of the mill
at Pine Falls for many years. Charges are pending against Abitibi-Price as a
result of the spill and the community of Sakeeng has issued a public
statement regarding the continued operation of the Pine Falls mill. The
position of the Sakeeng First Nation is that the Pulp and Paper Mill, owned and
operated by Abitibi-Price in the town of Pine Falls, Manitoba, be permanently
closed. Should the mill be allowed to continue to operate, the following
conditions must be imposed:
* The government of Canada and Abitibi-Price must complete an
environmental audit of all aspects of the operation of the mill and its effects
on the local environment. Both the immediate and the long term
environmental impact must be assessed.
* Abitibi-Price must immediately begin upgrading mill operations to meet
current environmental standards. Where possible, future proposed standards
must he considered when undertaking the upgrade and implemented with a
target of zero discharge of effluent.
* An Environmental Review Committee (ERC) must be formed to review and
oversee the continued operation of the mill.
* The environmental audit and the continued operation of the mill must be
conducted under the supervision and review of the ERC.
The Assembly of First Nations has received 25 million dollars over six years to
monitor water quality in 600 Aboriginal communities. The Pine Falls Pulp and
Paper Mill received 30 million dollars this year alone, from the two senior
levels of government, to continue its operation.
Abstract
A paper mill built on land inhabited by the Ojibway people in Sagkeeng,
Manitoba, is destroying the environment and lives of the native people. It
illegally dumps waste in the river, exploits Ojibway for labor and has
destroyed trees, plants and animals in the region.
Full Text: COPYRIGHT 1994 Canadian Dimension Publication, Ltd.
Source Citation
Daywalker. "What Price paper?" Canadian Dimension, May-June 1994, p.
33+. Opposing Viewpoints in Context,
ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/MagazinesDetailsPage/MagazinesDetailsWindo
w?
disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Magazines&currPage=&
scanId=&query=&prodId=OVIC&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&mod
e=view&catId=&limiter=&displayquery=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&docu
mentId=GALE
%7CA15261961&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&c
ommentary=&source=Bookmark&u=j220906043&jsid=579ba980597ff
33e6d18c9edbf5b391b. Accessed 28 Nov. 2016.
Gale Document Number: GALE|A15261961