Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Art Integration Lesson Plan: (Please Circle)
Art Integration Lesson Plan: (Please Circle)
Art Integration Lesson Plan: (Please Circle)
A. Aesthetics
Explain different responses you have to
different artworks.
Strand V: Historical and Cultural Contexts
o 1. Compare and contrast artworks from different historical
time periods and/or cultures.
B. Characteristics of artworks
Compare and contrast two artworks on:
subject matter, media, use of line, shape,
color, and texture, or theme/purpose.
2. Literacy:
Reading: Develop and apply skills to the reading process.
o C. Making Connections
B. Text to world (text ideas regarding their
experiences in the world).
Reading: Develop and apply skills and strategies to comprehend,
analyze, and evaluate nonfiction
o C. Text Structures
D. Identify the authors purpose.
Speaking: Speak effectively in collaborative discussions
o A. Collaborative Discussions
A. Taking turns in discussion with a shoulder partner,
according to classroom expectations
3. Social Studies:
SE 2: Interacting with others in ways that respect individual and group
differences
o B. Respect of Self and Others
Identify similarities and differences among families
and their traditions
Content Areas Integrated*:
1. Visual Art (Inspiration Artist: Marisol Escobar. The artist of one of the VTS
images I will use) I will be using three images that represent different families
for a VTS activity. The students also will be creating and discussing their own
representations of their family.
2. Literacy: I will be integrating literacy to this art lesson plan by reading the
book, The Family Book by Todd Parr.
These terms will be supported and taught through art during my lesson. The
students will be representing their family dynamics by creating art. We will
use VTS and these are pieces to talk about our similarities and differences.
Lastly, we will use the artwork as a way to talk about how we can embrace
our differences and truly be accepting of the differences or similarities that
we have within the classroom.
(Figure 3 Left)
Presentation Criteria
__/20
Exemplary
(20 pts)
Satisfactory
(15 pts)
Rudimentary
(10 pts)
Undeveloped
(0-5 pts)
Big Idea Criteria
__/25
Exemplary
Satisfactory
(25 pts)
(20 pts)
Rudimentary
(10 pts)
Undeveloped
(0-5 pts)
Integration Criteria
Exemplary
(25 pts)
- Preliminary lesson plan thinking & organization are represented visually & clearly using technology.
- All slides contain concise text &/or questions to further explicate relationships & connectedness between disciplines.
- Visually attractive. Includes artist exemplar and teacher example of product
- Preliminary lesson plan thinking & organization are represented visually & relatively clearly using technology.
- Most slides represent integrated content areas and show clear relationships.
- Most slides contain text &/or questions to further demonstrate relationships & connectedness.
- Preliminary lesson plan thinking & organization are evidenced, though less successfully, using Popplet technology.
-Slides representing integrated content areas are inconsistently make connections to disciplines.
- Text &/or questions contained in slides are difficult to understand; relationships are not entirely clear.
- Absent of all visuals
- Preliminary lesson plan thinking & organization is not evidenced due to incomplete
- If present, slides representing integrated content areas are neither color-coded nor linked coherently.
- If present, slides lack text & questions, which makes them difficult to interpret.
- no evidence of thoughtfulness or organization.
- Big Idea is clearly stated, developmentally appropriate, & highly relevant for the intended grade-level students.
- Big Idea addresses a timeless, cross-cultural, cross-disciplinary, life-centered issue with layers of meaning potential.
- Key concepts & essential questions are well-chosen, well-sequenced & scaffold understanding of the Big Idea.
- Big Idea offers differentiation potential & invites independent inquiry/continued, self-motivated learning.
- Big Idea is clearly stated; somewhat appropriate & relevant for the intended grade-level students.
- Big Idea addresses a timeless, cross-cultural, cross-disciplinary, life-centered issue with limited meaning potential.
- Key concepts & essential questions are appropriate and are somewhat supportive of the Big Idea.
- Big Idea offers some differentiation potential, some independent inquiry &/or some self-motivated learning.
- Big Idea is somewhat vague; may not be fully appropriate or relevant for the intended grade-level students.
- Big Idea is of limited scope in terms of time, culture, &/or discipline. Meaning potential is limited.
- Key concepts & essential questions are related to the Big Idea but do not flow smoothly from it.
- Big Idea offers some differentiation potential, some independent inquiry &/or some self-motivated learning.
- Big Idea is incoherent or not stated; appropriateness & relevance for intended grade-level students is not evident.
- Big Idea, if stated, is restricted in terms of time, culture, &/or discipline. Meaning potential is singular.
- Key concepts & essential questions, if stated, do not adequately support or flow from the Big Idea.
- Big Idea, it stated, does not offer differentiation potential or encourage independent, self-motivated inquiry.
Satisfactory
(20pts)
Rudimentary
(12 pts)
Undeveloped
(0-5 pts)
Basic Elements
__/20
Exemplary
Satisfactory
(20 pts)
(15 pts)
Rudimentary
Undeveloped
(0-5 pts)
Student Engagement
__/40
Exemplary
(10 pts)
(40 pts)
- Each interdisciplinary connection flows naturally/organically from others; all are mutually supportive/make sense.
- Interdisciplinary connections contribute to/expand student understanding of the Big Idea; suggest future inquiry
- Interdisciplinary connections are evident; most of the featured content areas are satisfactorily integrated.
- Most integrated content areas are relatively equal in importance, although ________ seems to dominate.
- Most interdisciplinary connections flow naturally/organically from others although ________seems less natural.
- Interdisciplinary connections contribute to student understanding of the Big Idea.
- Interdisciplinary connections were attempted although a parallel instructional model has resulted.
- Parallel content areas included remain distinct & hierarchical; one or more content areas dominate.
- Most parallel content areas are related, but one or more seem somewhat contrived or forced.
- Parallel content areas vaguely support the Big Idea; students may be left to connect them on their own.
- Interdisciplinary connections were not attempted.
- Content areas are disjointed & only vaguely connect.
- Content areas represented do not make sense as presented.
- Content areas do not support or contribute to student understanding of the Big Idea.
-Lesson Overview clearly & concisely summarizes the importance of the Art Integration Lesson.
-Lesson Objectives are clearly & concisely stated & support understanding of the Big Idea.
-Lesson GLEs & CCS Standards soundly connect lesson learning to state mandated expectations & standards.
-Vocabulary shared by the integrated content areas are clearly designated & concisely defined.
-Lesson Overview summarizes the importance of the Art Integration Lesson.
-Lesson Objectives generally support understanding of the Big Idea.
-Lesson GLEs & CCS Standards address state mandated expectations & standards.
-Vocabulary shared by the integrated content areas are satisfactorily identified & defined.
-Lesson Overview summarizes the importance of the Art Integration Lesson.
-Lesson Objectives generally support understanding of the Big Idea.
-Lesson GLEs & CCS Standards address state mandated expectations & standards.
-Vocabulary shared by the integrated content areas are satisfactorily identified & defined.
-Lesson Overview, if completed, does not address the importance of the Art Integration Lesson.
-Lesson Objectives, if present, do not clearly support the Big idea.
-Lesson GLEs & CCS Standards, if present, are not clearly related to lesson learning.
- Vocabulary, if present, are not satisfactorily identified or defined.
-Key Concepts & Essential Questions powerfully & sequentially scaffold student understanding of lesson & Big Idea.
-Lesson objectives successfully & simultaneously address Key Concepts, Essential Questions, GLEs, & CCS Standards.
-Lesson Activities & Procedures are thorough, sequential, and support scaffolding.
-Lesson demonstrates variety & innovation; considers interests, needs, & abilities of all.
Satisfactory
(33 pts)
Rudimentary
(20 pts)
Undeveloped
(0-5 pts)
Reflective Questions
Exemplary
(20 pts)
__/20
Satisfactory
(15 pts)
Rudimentary
(10 pts)
Undeveloped
(0-5 pts)
-Lesson encourages student responsibility & active participation in the learning direction & design.
-Lesson offers frequent opportunities for students to self-assess, peer-assess, & share products of their learning.
-Key Concepts & Essential Questions satisfactorily support lesson and connect to the Big Idea.
-Lesson objectives reflect most of the Key Concepts, Essential Questions, GLEs, & CCS Standards.
-Lesson Activities & Procedures are somewhat thorough, sequential, and support scaffolding.
-Lesson somewhat consider the interests, needs, & abilities of most students.
-Lesson encourages student responsibility somewhat; offers students limited participation in learning direction/design.
-Lesson offers limited student opportunities to assess & share products of their learning.
-Key Concepts & Essential Questions vaguely support lesson & vaguely connect to the Big Idea.
-Lesson objectives reflect a few of the Key Concepts, Essential Questions, GLEs, & CCS Standards.
-Lesson Activities & Procedures are somewhat sequential and support scaffolding.
-Lesson does not appear to consider interests, needs, & abilities of students.
-Lesson encourages student responsibility somewhat; offers students limited participation in learning direction/design.
-Lesson offers very limited student opportunities to assess & share products of their learning.
-Key Concepts & Essential Questions, if present, do not connect clearly to the Big Idea.
-Lesson objectives, if present, do not clearly connect to Key Concepts, Essential Questions, GLEs, &/or CCS Standards.
-Lesson Activities & Procedures are outlined.
-Lesson lacks apparent concern for student interests, needs & abilities.
-Lesson does not encourage student responsibility or invite participation in the learning direction or design.
-Lesson offers very limited, if any, student opportunities to assess & share products of their learning.
-Reflective responses impressively demonstrate the students ability to consider/ plan for the multiple aspects of teaching.
-Reflective responses demonstrate thorough understanding of children as learners.
-Reflective questions evidence a high degree of pedagogical knowledge, creativity, & insight.
-Reflective responses evidence some ability to consider/ plan for the multiple aspects of teaching.
-Reflective responses demonstrate some consideration of children as learners.
-Reflective questions evidence a degree of pedagogical knowledge, creativity, & insight.
-Reflective responses evidence minimal ability to consider/ plan for the multiple aspects of teaching.
-Reflective responses demonstrate minimal consideration of children as learners.
-Reflective questions evidence a limited pedagogical knowledge, creativity, & insight.
-Reflective responses, if completed, do not evidence ability to consider/ plan for the multiple aspects of teaching.
-Reflective response, if completed, do not appear to consider children as learners.
-Reflective questions, if completed, do not evidence pedagogical knowledge, creativity, or insight.
Total Points _____/150
Comments: