Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Discourse Community Ethnography-2
Discourse Community Ethnography-2
Discourse Community Ethnography-2
A discourse community can be defined by many actions that people sometimes take.
Every person belongs to a discourse community, many might not know if theyre in one. There
are many communities to which one can belong to. Many might belong to more than one
discourse community. Sometimes you might not know it but, sometimes people can belong to the
same discourse community as you. Many wonder what the real meaning of a discourse
community is, or what it really does. According to professor and analyst, John Swales (1990), a
discourse community is the common assumption that operates within conventions defined by
communities, academic disciplines or social groups, and also has a broadly agreed set of
common public goals. Swales included 6 characteristics that make up the discourse community.
These characteristics represent what the discourse community is all about. Each person may have
their own community were people join, or others just belong to one already without knowing that
they even belong to one. For a community to be discourse it has to include the 6 characteristics,
and those have to take action in the community. A discourse community can be anything, it can
be an organization, a class, etc.
Now, as a new incoming student in the University at Texas at El Paso, with a major in
international business I know that Im going to have to join or be a member of a discourse
community that has to do with my major, and thats going to have to be something involving
international business. In my school there are many organizations that I'm looking forward to
joining.
According to John Swales article, The Concept of Discourse Community, tell us the
meaning of what discourse community is, what Swales is telling us in this article is that for a
group or organization to be a discourse community it has to follow some specific rules, and what
those rules include are the six main characteristics that make up the discourse community. A
group or organization must include and take into action these six characteristics. Those six
characteristics include that members need to strive for common public goals, what this means is
that the organization and the members need to have a goal for the organization, they need to
strive for a goal. The second characteristic includes having communication mechanisms between
its members, what this means is that each member needs to be able to communicate with each
other in order for the organization to work. The third characteristic is informational exchange
with feedback,this means that the members and the organization need to have certain feedback
from a sponsor or a group of people that are willing to help. The fourth characteristic is to be
able to work certain genres or standards that they communicate, specific lexis which are certain
terms that only the community knows, and its members should have suitable degrees of expertise
(Swales, 1990).
Swales also tells us about the differences between the discourse communities and speech
communities. A speech community is a community that shares knowledge of rules for the
conduct and interpretation of speech, of any kind (Swales, 1990). A reason that both speech and
discourse communities are different, is that both have a different set of goals. Another reason is
that in the discourse community they tend to separate people into groups where they are
Conclusion
As I have observed and analyzed each of Swales six characteristics, I can conclude that
GEEO (Global Engagement and Exchange Organization) is definitely a discourse community.
All the key elements that Swales asks are included in this organization, and I chose this
organization because its going to help me to prepare for the future. International business is the
career that I want for myself, and in order to get to that I need to learn and receive feedback to
help me in the future, and what other best organization to learn from than a discourse
community.
References
Swales, J. (1990). The concept of discourse community. In E. Wardle & D. Downs (Eds.),
Writing about writing: A college reader (p. 212-227). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins.
Kain, D., Wardle, E. (2005). Activity Theory: An Introduction for the Writing Classroom. In E.
Wardle & D. Downs (Eds.), Writing about writing: A college reader (p. 277). Boston, MA:
Bedford/St. Martins