Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leopold at Loyola - Research and Bibliography
Leopold at Loyola - Research and Bibliography
To share Aldo Leopolds land ethic, his legacy and his writings with educators,
students, and families.
need to broaden our view of value beyond economics, so that we can see the
immense intangible values associated with the land.
The more you know about the land, better you can treat it
Leopolds Values:
We have to value nature for reasons other than its economic value
Learn more about how every little plant, insect, animal, depend on each other
Case Study Analysis: Where Loyola (general) and the IES (specific) has been in the
past, how we got to where we are now, and where we can go in the future to be more
aligned with Aldo Leopold's institutional/educational vision.
Interview Questions:
Kevin Erickson - Urban Agriculture Coordinator
1.) What does Loyola, or the Urban Ag program specifically, do to engage the
community alongside an academic setting?
Example-IES: Operates a Farmers Market for the local community, consults with
local organizations on restoration and agricultural development projects, supports
Internships with local organizations in the community, donates campus grown
produce to the community, Climate Change Conference open to the community
to help educate on environmental issues, policy, research, etc.
Get out of the classroom and experience real programs, businesses, and
organizations doing this work. This includes Internships, volunteering, research,
and community engagement. We also have an amazing campus in Woodstock
called LUREC that allows students to engage in conservation/restoration work on
a larger scale.
4.)How are his views about humans connecting with nature or views about why
conservation/sustainability is needed in an academic setting present within Loyola
Urban Ag?
It is important that the ideas cultivated in the academic setting be mirrored in the
physical operations of the campus. This allows the campus community to
engage in sustainability from an individual and systems approach, which is
relevant to any organization they work with in the future as well as their personal
life. For example, individual students can engage in our compost collection
program and we collect organic waste from dining halls as a systematic
approach.
In LUC Urban Ag, the program is designed to cultivate both personal and
professional growth within the field of sustainable agriculture. In addition to the
program serving Loyola students as a mechanism to cultivate relevant
knowledge, career experience, and leadership, it also serves the larger campus
and local community by providing fresh food to the Farmers Market and local
food pantries. This is also very important in the urban landscape as humans are
often disconnected from nature in this setting. Growing food in a city connects
humans to our most basic needs and reminds us that even though we live in a
relatively unnatural setting, we still rely completely on nature to fulfill our most
vital resources.
5.) What kind of ethics or responsibilities do you uphold when working with the land?
How has this changed throughout your time here at Loyola?
This approach is the main goal of sustainable agriculture and has remained since
my introduction into the farming world. My knowledge of soil ecosystems during
my time at Loyola, which has led to allowing for more specific approaches to
long-term soil health and fertility as opposed to managing soil health on a year to
year basis. Ive also learned to fight less against nature by incorporating
practices such as attracting beneficial insects instead of using pesticides, adding
organic matter into the soil to mitigate water loss, and by planting native edible
plants to reduce pest, disease, and provide food and habitat for pollinators.
How do you think Loyola or the IES embodies Leopolds vision for human interaction
with nature? Any specific examples?
I can't speak for the IES. I think Loyola's value of sustainability is embodied in its
value of social justice. While we have some environmental (ecological) priority
given to certain elements (Lake Michigan, biodiversity around LUREC) because
of our campuses and locations, our primary motivation for sustainability is the
impact to people. This considers vulnerable populations in the world such as the
global poor and disenfranchised but especially those individuals in our
neighboring communities that feel the impacts of environmental degradation,
pollution and extreme weather events.
I'm no expert of Leopold but its my understanding that he argued that people
were a part of natural systems. This is certainly the argument of sustainability in
the triple-bottom line definition. Ultimately Loyola is here for our students and to
serve as a place of learning. This is primary. That being said, we want to reflect
the values of our traditions and the our students and sustainability towards social
justice is strongly supported by our community.
What is the status report for the Climate Action Plan in reaching our targets for 2025?
How does this target incorporate Leopolds conservationist view?
Some goals are on target (energy efficiency, solar pv, wind turbine, adaptation,
teaching, education campaign, demonstration sites, annual reporting) but many
are not (green purchasing, water efficiency, landscape, pest management, solar
thermal, RECs, carbon offsets, research).
The target demonstrates the moral and ethical importance of climate change
dedicating resources to addressing our campuses' impact globally and in our own
backyard.
I have no idea how this connects to Leopold. It connects to our moral obligation
to reduce carbon emissions and the subsequent suffering that all living things will
incur if we see our climate change at rates and ranges that the populations on
earth have never experienced.
For two reasons: (1) experiments require a lot of maintenance and work to obtain
results, so I need the labor, and (2) experiential learning is a fantastic way for
students to apply things they learned in class in a real-world setting.
How do you implement the teachings of Aldo Leopold pertaining to environmental ethics
into your experiments?
How does your role as an educator of ecology help instill responsible environmental
values in your students, for instance, through sustaining of natural cycles, the
preservation of plant and animal species, and the exercising of caution before changing
ecosystems in major ways without careful study of future consequences?
Id say the biggest impact I might have is in dispelling common folk myths that
environmentally-aware students commonly have. One common myth is that
nature is always in balance until humans mess it up. Another is that all of the
organisms in a community purposefully work to maintain the balance of
populations and biogeochemical cycles. I try to replace these myths with a soberminded understanding of how ecosystems actually work, which is precisely the
kind of understanding needed to address real environmental challenges.
Did any environmentalists inspire you when creating this program? If so who and why?
Talk about climate change -- people support him with his passion but nothing
ever happens so he was getting depressed seeing that everyone understands
the problem and knows we have to make a change but no one ever does
anything
She thinks hes right and he was one of the people he was talking to and she
thought she needs to do more! Was inspired. Work with Fr. Garanzini who
understood climate change, biodiversity and being an injustice issues because
they disproportionately affect poor
More information on the Aldo Leopold award. How was this award created, what criteria
needs to be met to win the award?
Outstanding seniors
Highest grade point or grade point and service online -- describe him and why
we name the award after him and criteria
What was the intent of the new IES courses that will be offered in the next year or so?
More statistical and quantitative specialization? What are those courses?
Working on developing master's program that will be solely offered in the IES: NS
in environmental science
o 1 non thesis version: all classes for professionals
o 1: MS degreeclassic masters of science, some in course work some in
thesis research
o All students have to take year of general bio and gen chem and both labs.
o Offer environmental lab, environmental statistics course both required
o Electives: statistic courses,
Our mission hasn't changed. Before the inception of IES, the faculty and staff of
the Department of Environmental Science, CUERP [Center for Urban
Environmental Research and Policy], and the Office of Sustainability (all of which
have been subsumed by IES) were engaged in development of new curricula
and able to work with the architects of the labs, greenhouse/aquaponics facility
and the biodiesel lab to generate what we thought would allow us to fulfill the
mission best. While the mission hasn't changed, the ways in which we achieve
our mission goals are constantly evolving thanks, in large part, to input for our
majors and alumni. We will be launching a new curriculum for all of our 6 majors
in Fall 2017 incorporating changes identified/requested by our current majors or
alumni as ways to make the program more robust. We've brought on senior
faculty in Sustainable Business Management to inform our students of alternative
models of business... moreover, we've brought on adjunct faculty to fill what we
perceived as intellectual 'holes' in our curriculum. For example, Environmental
Economics (ENVS 328) is required for all of our majors, yet it presents economic
issues from a traditional, consumer/producer prospective. Now we also offer
'Ecological Economics' (ENVS 335), which explores more sustainable models,
which clearly has relevance in dealing with issues of social justice.
Since the inception of IES, we've produced, in collaboration with LUC faculty/students
from both sciences and humanities, and collaborators worldwide, an electronic
environmental science textbook intended for upper-division high-students/lower-division
college students that incorporates consideration of ethical and spiritual perspectives.
This is available on the web for no cost to students around the globe.
In March, 2017, we will be holding our 4th Annual Climate Change Conference
that, historically, has drawn students and faculty from Jesuit Universities across
the country, and local residents. Themes obligatorily involve ethical
considerations.
Since the inception of IES we have expanded our internal internship program,
providing hands-on experience and opportunities to take the lead on projects of
interest in our Biodiesel Lab, Greenhouse/Aquaponics facility and Office of
Sustainability... their efforts have generated services and structures that enhance
sustainability on campus and benefit the local community. Also, our solutions to
environmental problem (STEP) classes continue to provide all LUC students the
opportunity to devise, develop and bring to fruition projects that will (or already
have) affect positive change on campus and beyond. Product of this class
include the Biodiesel Lab, the LUC Farmer's Market, Urban Ag program, Bottled
Water ban, apiary...
While the mission of IES has not changed, the ways we accomplish this mission
have been fluid, allowing us to respond input of students, staff and faculty to
make modifications to increase our ability to effectively address local, regional
and global environmental problems. Successful solution or mitigation of
environmental problems which, by their nature, disproportionately influence the
disenfranchised and poor, requires multi-disciplinary collaboration. A critical
consideration in these efforts are ethical considerations.
Do you think the IES program would benefit from introducing more ethics-based
environmental courses or including more ethical teachings in foundational
environmental science courses?
Absolutely. Currently there are two courses that directly deal with ethical
perceptions and consideration of environmental issues (ENVS 284
[Environmental Justice] and PHIL 287 [Environmental Ethics]). Historically,
THEO 184 (Moral Problems: Ecology Crisis) was taught regularly, but is no
longer a part of the LUC Core, so the Theology Department can no longer afford
staff to teach it. ENVS 383 (Human Dimensions of Conservation) clearly must
incorporate issues dealing with ethical considerations. We are strengthening our
connections with the Quinlan School of Business to partner in developing
curricula that address sustainable business practices. We hired Professor Nancy
Landrum, jointly with QSB, to develop these collaborative ties. A new minor in
Sustainable Business has already been developed and approved.
We have already reached out to both the Theology and Philosophy Departments
to brainstorm about the prospect of new course development. Beyond the
excellent classes that already exist, there are quality faculty with
interests/expertise in ethics related to environmental issues that we would love to
develop classes that would be available to all LUC students that would increase
recognition that dealing with the current environmental crisis must incorporate
ethical considerations.
am not sure that I fully understand the last part of the question. ENVS 224 is a
tier-II science core course, which focuses on the scientific part of climate change.
I try to keep my own opinion out of the lectures when I teach evidence of climate
change and the analytical methods used in climate research. Students should
learn to draw their conclusions through critical thinking exercises and
consequently form their own opinions regarding solution to climate change. A
specific example is when students learn how scientists make the "diagnose" that
the primary cause of modern climate change is human burning fossil fuels. I give
students several hands-on exercises, in which students use mathematical
analysis to understand why natural causes cannot explain the observed warming.
Another example is when students practice running a simple climate model to
see the consequence of the disturbed carbon cycle. They will run the model
under different assumptions of CO2 emission scenarios. The model predicted
CO2 concentrations and temperature changes in the next 100 years (which are
shown to continue increasing even with sharp CO2 emission cuts) demonstrate
the urgency of taking immediate action to cut CO2 emissions.
How do you think Loyola or the IES embodies Leopolds vision for human interaction
with nature? Any specific examples?
I think Loyola, especially IES, embodies Leopold's vision for human interaction
with nature well. We offer environmental courses that cover human-and-nature
interaction. Students have lab and field work opportunities (e.g., biodiesel lab,
toxicology lab, LUREC internships). We have student-run campaigns and
activities on campus every semester that address environmental sustainability
(Examples: Earth Week, Water Week).
Have you seen any specific changes in the IES curriculum since 2013 that emphasizes
Leopold's views (positive changes in that direction or not)?
To my best knowledge, changes in the IES curriculum since 2013 have been
discussed and recently submitted to the University for approval. This is a good
question to ask Prof. Peterson. My impression is that the new changes will
emphasize Leopold's views and they are positive changes. Examples include
developing new courses in Solutions to Environmental Problems (STEP), career
development, environmental statistics, environmental management, and more
options for capstone courses.
Do you see the IES curriculum and mindset integrating into the Loyola curriculum?
I am not capable of answering this question because I am not familiar with the
Loyola curriculum. I hope it is well integrated into the Loyola curriculum.
Amber White - Post Grad Student and Recipient of LUC Aldo Leopold Award
1.) What steps did you take to win this award?
I started doing research in conjunction with the biodiesel lab my freshman year and
stuck with it throughout my undergraduate career. The most important event that kept
me involved was my sophomore year when I applied for an EPA grant to support my
research- this really kept the door open for me to keep doing research and progressing
on my project. Also, I maintained a good relationship with my advisers, Zach Waickman
and David Crumrine. This was incredibly important because they helped me stay
engaged and guided me through the research process, which encouraged me to stick
with it.
2.) How did your actions on campus embrace Leopold 's view, specifically that of handson experience with conservation and engaging a community?
Leopold strongly believed in the ethical treatment of the land and actively engaging with
how we use the land. I tried to act out this ethic through my individual actions on
campus such as recycling and reducing my waste. As an RA I challenged my residents
to make a "go green promise" to stick to one action that would reduce their waste and
moved away from paper intensive decorations. My research was also focused on waste
water treatment and the sustainable use of water in the biodiesel production process,
which further embraced Leopold's view because of the intent to responsibly use our
classes could place a greater emphasis on building lasting connections with our
community. Loyola could stop buying up every open lot in the neighborhood, Loyola
could invite community members and groups to our events. There's a lot that Loyola
could do and I think it would start with having conversations/qualitative interviews with
community members/organizations to ask them this same question.
3.) According to Aldo Leopold's views of connecting people with conservationist views
through hands-on learning, what do you believe is the most important action to take
when trying to expose students to a real-world setting?
I think it's really important when teaching anybody anything to show them the big
picture, to ask them to think about the impacts and effects of their work, and to think
critically about the information you're giving them. Don't just ask people to get their
hands dirty but explain to them why it's important and expect that they may think about
the purpose differently from you. Find common ground.
4.) How has working as a student limited or even promoted your efforts towards
conservation/sustainability?
Working as a student has exposed me to a lot of conservation and sustainability efforts.
I have learned about many different groups and organizations, I've attended
conservation/sustainability events in Chicago, I've met a lot of people who are involved
in this work. The people I've met have shared their ideas and projects with me and that
on its own has exposed me to a lot of new information. The only way it's limited me has
been with the time commitment--I don't really have time to volunteer frequently with
other projects.
5.) What kind of ethics or responsibilities do you uphold when working with the land?
How has this changed throughout your time here at Loyola or in the Urban Ag program?
For me this is a question that has to have a context. Working in Chicago I think a lot
about conserving soil and water resources, keeping litter out of the gardens and nearby
streets, and building rapport with our neighbors and passersby. I have a great respect
for plants and natural processes (decomposition, weather, soil health, insects) and I try
to emphasize that with my work and how I work with volunteers/interns. If I was working
in a less urban setting I think my responsibilities would include understanding the native
ecosystem and trying to build it up around my agricultural endeavors. As I've worked at
IES for longer I've personally put a greater emphasis on community
engagement/attitude. We (as students/workers) can only do so much without a greater
community support.
Patrick Green - Director of Experiential Learning
1.) How does engaged learning help student get out of the classroom and into the
community?So, engaged learning started in Fall 2012 with the intention of how do we
weave experiential opportunities into the curriculum in really significant ways to help
students to bring their learning to life. That can be achieved in a variety of ways which is
why we have the five categories of engaged learning: academic internships, fieldwork,
undergraduate research, public performance. All the categories are community focused
to all student to connect their learning to a larger community and explore their topic of
study.
2.) What was the main goal when creating the engaged learning program?
A lot of it was based on research that said students learn more deeply by applying their
learning. It allows them to directly see how their topic of study connects to their
community and how what theyre studying can apply to real life issues. We are bringing
it to life.
3.) What could be better about the program now that its established within the
academic setting?
We just completed from some focus groups of students which said that they wished
other loyola student would be more engaged. In a course you can always tell which
student want to be actively engaged and which are just checking the box of
requirements. We try and get them to see the importance of it and find a passion in it
which is why we try to promote engaged learning and why its important. It can build on
itself and we want to show that there are multiple ways to get involved and this is the
reality of the program.
4.) Can requiring engaged learning take away from the focus of what its trying to do?
Anytime you require anything, theres resistance. and sometimes thats human nature. I
think in the creation in engaged learning we were very sensitive to that which is why we
have the five categories. Students have lots of opportunities and I often describe it as a
buffet where you can try anything and we want you to pick more than one. By requiring
it student may lose the focus of what the program is trying to accomplish. Whatever you
self-identified identities may be, the jesuit mission of loyola seeks justice and we
question how we do that and what does that mean to me and my community? We try to
accept this invitation of service and reflect upon what we mean in this question which is
the real reason we have engaged learning.
5.) What is the biggest take-away from engaged learning? Whats the biggest thing that
impacts their life?
I think the biggest take away is the connection of theory to practice. They read about
these concepts but when you have the different types of learning they put these into
practice and see what they look life in life and in real people when they have a name
and a face and that these problems are bigger and more complex than we realize. The
second is the reflection of what role do I have in this community? Student find this place
that challenges them to find out who they are within their own communities.
Compare Leopold and Loyola
Leopolds values state that we should teach history differently and how the land
helped the people through time; meaning the success of humans have been
based off the land and what it can offer them.
o K.E interview: the soil needs to be a long-term investment to ensure the
further yields of crops while building a way to interact with the land in an
environmentally sound manner
Leopold wants to broaden our view on the value of nature beyond economics
o Loyola is actually expanding into sustainable business classes and
practices which shows an incline to more economics-based courses
Solutions