Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problem Statement 3. Causes & Possible Solutions
Problem Statement 3. Causes & Possible Solutions
1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
5a
Inventory Availability
Stock inaccuracy
0.9
0.8
Percent
0.7
0.5
Supplier leadtimes
0.3
0.2
Poor supplier
quality
0.1
0
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Develop EQDC
in supply chain review on
scorecard
Dec
Transaction
Training
Incorrect
leadtime on subcon - H/T and
plate
Poor supplier
contracts
Jan
Queues behind
bottleneck processes
Lack of focus on
supplier delivery
performance
0.4
Capacity planning
incorrect
Poor transaction
discipline in booking
materials in / kitting
jobs
0.6
Accurate
Replenishment
model not yet
established
cross training to be
implemented in critical areas
14
Insufficient capacity
on van
Poor employee
engagement/motiva
tion
Incorrect routings
15
Incorrect BOM / S
Specs
No penalty for
ordering within
leadtime
Difficult to obtain
drws in Goods
Inwards
16
10
6 sigma project on
plating quality
Poor Quality
Systems
Orders placed
within lead-time
Lack of standard
work
Quality issues
resulting in rework
loops
Inventory puddles
between OPs
11
Incorrect
leadtime on subcon - H/T and
plate
12
No FIFO in stores
Measure OEE on
bottleneck processes
Plan to
communicate LTs
to CSRs
Poor
communication with
CSRs
Update visual
loading charts in
Symix
Other 13
Global CI Teams?
Leadtime wrong on
Symix
Lack of flexibility on
working hours
Orders placed
within lead-time
Machine availabiltiy
Introduce cycle
counting
procedure inc RC
Analysis.
Customer Demand
Lack of focus
5b
a Implementline-side
Feast or Famine
loading
Insufficient
component items
being held as
inventory
Capacity
17
Align QA to value
streams. Achieve
and sustain TS2
requirements
100% inspection
18
Shipping errors
2. TARGET STATEMENT
Supply Chain
12
Expected Improvement
(%)
Cause Area
Concern
Root Cause
Action Description
Start Date
Start of Savings
Date
Status
Actual
Improvement
(%)
1.5
Supply Chain
3/1/2006
31/04/06
1.5
12
1.5
SubContractors
4/1/2006
6/30/2006
Other
Continuous firefighting
with respect to OTD
performance
5/12/2006
9/1/2006
5/31/2006
7/30/2006
5/31/2006
12/30/2006
2/1/2006
9/1/2006
5/1/2006
31/09/06
13
5b
2
13
1.0
10
1.0
Inventory
Availability
2.0
Inventory
Availability
3
16
5b
15
17
In Process
Complete
Late
No.
5a
18
Quality
Lead Time
Capability
Sub-Contractors
There has only been a gradual improvement in OTD to Request Year to date. Our
objective is to achieve a step change towards the stretch goal of 95 % OTD to Request
0.5
Capacity
18
1.0
Quality
5a
3.0
Capacity
TBA
7
8
10
1.0
1.0
Capacity
SubContractors
Low
5/1/2006
9/1/2006
5/18/2006
10/1/2006
Hard
Ease of Completion
Easy
Total Expected
Improvement (%)
13.5
Expected OTD to
Request (%)
93.5
Total Actual
Improvement (%)
1.5