Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Surgical Procedures That Change Refracting Ability of Eye:: Different Types of Refractive Surgery
Surgical Procedures That Change Refracting Ability of Eye:: Different Types of Refractive Surgery
Fitting
problems post
RK due to
Fitting
problems
Other
problems
Recommende
d lens
Fitting
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Pre operation
Incising periphery
Pressure acting
Post operation
Pre operation
Post operation
LASIK
Keratocytes
1.
2.
3.
4.
Following PRK
and LASIK
Complications
PRK
Procedure
Ablation zone
CL fitting
Complications
Epikeratophakia
Procedure
Attachment of pre-lathed human cornea to eye
Epithelium removed and lenticel placed on top of Bowmans membrane
Wedge shaped annulus > edges of lenticel fitted into pocket
Lenticle sutured
Suture tension = great role in ultimate success
Epithelium grows over
Advantages
No microkeratome needed
No lamination of cornea
Fitting for
Factors to keep in mind:
residual
1. Corneal topography altered significantly
ametropia
- Central K readings not adequate to guide first lens choice
2. Epithelial cell density reduced
- Cells arranged irregularly with weak interdigitations
- Resurfacing and reparation slow
3. Corneal sensitivity reduced
- Increase risk of infection
- Irregular astigmatism
- SPK
- Decreased vision
- RCE
- Healing problems
Lenses
Hard/soft with good oxygen supply
Lens that fulfills all the usual criteria
Differentiate between keratomileusis and epikeratophakia
Keratomileusis
Thickness volume technique
Lamellar surgical procedure
Involves the use of host tissue that is frozen so that curvature can be altered using
cryolathe
Results in changes in the corneal structure and transparency
Epikeratophakia
Attachment of pre-lathed human cornea to the eye
No lamination
Epithelium removed and lenticle placed on Bowmans
Wedge shaped annulus created and fitted into pockets
Sutured into place
Keratoplasty
Definition
Success rates
Complications
Penetrating
keratoplasty
uses
Conditions
that benefit
from
keratoplasty
Fitting CL
1.
2.
1.
2.
Corneal transplantation
Good
77-100% of grafts remain clear
Regular and irregular astigmatism
Anisometropia
Optical (most common reason = keratoconus)
Tectonic (grafting for repair of structural changes in cornea; eg.
Marginal thinning)
3. Therapeutic (trauma)
4. Cosmetic
1. Keratoconus
2. Fuchs endothelial dystrophy
3. Previous graft failure
4. Bullous keratopathy
5. Interstitial and herpes keratitis
6. Stromal dystrophies
2 main directions
Therapeutic
Optical
Optical:
Topography and physiology of corneal graft not normal
Eye lacks inbuilt safety margins of normal eye
Changes that are likely:
- Graft thicker than normal eye once settled down (0.6mm vs
0.5mm)
Polymegathism:
- Normal: central sensitivity greater than peripheral
- Keratoplasty: reverse
- Corneal sensitivity decreased + sensitive lids > fitting not easier
Fitting RGP
Graft topography
No regular grafts
Certain characteristics of graft make CL fitting difficult:
1. Most grafts steeper than host cornea and protrude in nipple-like
manner
2. All grafts toroidal > Cl give better sight than specs
3. Graft can be tilted > bubbles under lens in join area
4. Graft eccentricity > lens designed to centre on graft may e off eyes
visual axis
Changes in corneal topography > conventional designs wont centre
near visual axis
To obtain centration:
a. Fit larger lenses (10-12mm)
b. Bicurve/tricurve design
c. Objective > span both graft and junction
d. OZ must be larger than diameter of graft (grafts = 7-8mm)
Point out that many lenses will have to b e tried before adequate lens
found
K readings not helpful > exact parameters best determined by using
diagnostic lenses
ORTHOKERATOLOGY
Definition
Initial idea
New reverse
geometry
lenses
Fluorescein
pattern
Procedure
Disadvantage
s
Advantages
Theories On The
Stiff lens
Massaging
action
Hydraulic
pressure
Decreased
ciliary spasm
Corneal
sphericalizatio
n
Axial length
reduction
Other factors
Mechanism Of Orthokeratology
Thick stiff rigid lens creates mechanical pressure to flatten cornea
Movement of lens and massaging action of lid yield flattening of cornea
Ocular rigidity
Anterior chamber depth reduction
Corneal thickness changes
Crystalline lens changes
Alterations in corneal metabolism
Accelerated Ortho-K
Traditional
method
Reverse geometry
lenses
Fit
Procedure
Important facts to
remember
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ortho keratology
Application of a series of rigid contact lenses that flatten the central curvature resulting in the
reduction/ elimination of myopia and astigmatism
Standard ortho keratology
Initial idea was to use the technique of fitting lenses flatter than the flattest K to achieve
corneal flattening
Lenses approximately 0.37 0.5D flatter than flattest K
Decrease in myopia 1.5 to 0.5D. Average 1D
Usual design of hard lens where the base curve is steepest and peripheral curves more
flatter
Most of the myopia reduction in the first 9-18 months
Fit the lens flatter and flatter as the process progresses
Flatter lenses causes poor centration and edge lift
Accelerated ortho keratology
Using reverse geometry lenses
Reverse geometry lenses have a second curve that is steeper, peripheral curves are based
on secondary curve, not base curve
Reverse geometry lenses = accelerated otho keratology results within 3 months
The lenses can be fitted much flatter than usual
The fit is important central 4-5mm bearing
2-3mm mid peripheral pooling
1-2mm movement
Determine the base curve, power with over refraction
Lenses made flatter 0.25-0.5D
No further change = retainer lens to maintain corneal shape. Centration is very important
Eccentricity
patient suitability
Mean improvement in Snellen VA = 5-6 lines
Px worse than 6/36 wont become 6/6
Only moderate amounts treated
3-4D
Reverse geometry lenses dont reduce ATR astig and may induce it
WTR more amenable to being reduced (moderate)
Only corneal astigmatism reduced
Absolute contraindications:
1. Keratoconus
2. Corneal dystrophies
3. Anterior segment disease
Relative contraindications:
1. Dry eyes
2. 3 and 9 o clock staining
List the absolute and relative contraindications to orthokeratology.
Trial lens fitting:
Empirical
Trial lenses
FL pattern
analysis
a. 3-zone lenses:
- OK series BC
- RC edge
b. 4-5 zone lenses:
- ElHage
BC, RC PC edge
- Driem lens
- Wave design
- Paragon CRT
- Scioptic EZM
- BE lens
Commonalities:
a. Lens must centre
b. Touch in centre (pupil zone)
c. Alignment zone = wide band of close alignment
d. RC narrow and deep (4-5 zone lenses)/ wide and tapered (EZM and
BE)
Ideal fit
Smiley face
Flat
Decentred superiorly
Smiley face
with fake
central island
Central island
Steep/tight lens
Frowny face
Decentred laterally/inferiorly
Tight alignment curve/lens
diameter too small
Centre divot
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Clearer vision
Increased tear exchange
Decreased hypoxia
Decreased acute red eye
Do not cover limbus
Decreased contamination
Deposits removable
UV blocking available
Unlimited parameters
Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Deposits/contamination
Hypoxia
Neovascularization
Acute red eye
Increased cost of lens care
Limited parameters
Occasionally decentre
Occasional poor fit
Increased fitting time
Adaptation period
Limited experience with
extended wear