Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ted 690-3
Ted 690-3
Week 3
PDQP Progress Report
Courtney Burnett
TED 690
Professor Johnson
Abstract
Introduction
The Professional Development Quest Portfolio, I have learned, is a
culmination of all you have done to this point as a teacher and all you will intend to
do as a teacher. It is ever-filling and is never deemed complete. Teaching is a
profession of life-long learning the PDQP should reflect that progress. Many artifacts
may be found within the portfolio can include: original lesson plans, evidence of
student learning, written feedback from observations and evaluations, digital video
and audio clips, and reflective journal entries. (Costantino, P. M. & De Lorenzo, M.
N. 2009 p. 6) All of these artifacts help to give your teaching impression to those
who are evaluating your craft. Reasons for using these artifacts must be justified
and they must go along with the Teacher Performance Expectation given for each of
the different domains found with the portfolio. The TPEs are based on national
standards for beginning and experienced teachers to provide the foundation for a
unifying vision needed to ensure consistency and compatibility with the many
approaches to teacher education and professional development. (Costantino, P. M.
& De Lorenzo, M. N. 2009 p. 9)
I would like to take some time in this paper to give a progress report to the
PDQP I am currently working on. At this point, my portfolio is about halfway to the
point I would like it to be to by the end of this course. I would like to add to the final
two domains in my portfolio (domain B and E) with meaningful artifacts. I would also
like to go through and make sure there are not any artifacts that would fall under
any of the domains I have already added to that would help to better serve those
Rationales
I would like to include in this progress report paper a rationale for choosing
the artifacts that I did in the sections C and D of my PDQP. Under domain C, the
TPEs that are covered in PDQP are making content accessible for all students and
teaching for English learners. For this artifact, I included all of my CELDT scores
from my EL students from last academic year. I included all of them to show what
kind portion of my class of 24 can be EL students. Each of these students bring their
own set of needs to the classroom. I also included all of them, to show the range of
capability each EL student can bring to the classroom. I use the CLEDT scores at the
beginning of each year to help me group them in leveled groups for RTI rotations.
The most important thing that is told to me through the vast range of their
capabilities, is that all EL students should not be grouped into one. I have had some
EL students that struggle and I have had some EL students that are the top
performers in my class. These CELDT scores tell me that these students should not
be labeled as "EL" and expected to have the same needs. They are considered, as
Reference
Costantino, P. M. & De Lorenzo, M. N. (2009) Developing a Professional Teaching
Portfolio, A Guide for Success. Pearson: New Jersey.