Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spsy 620 Intro To Mtss Syllabus - Fall 2016 2
Spsy 620 Intro To Mtss Syllabus - Fall 2016 2
Phone:
E-mail:
Office Hours:
Credit Hours: 3
Highlights
(see full table below for ALL info)
WELCOME!!!
Iris Module in-class quiz
e-Resource/Google Site shell due (share link in
Dropbox)
Presentation in-class: PBIS
Online Live Session
2 reading group presentations
Presentation in-class: Supporting Transgender Youth
5 reading group presentations
Online Live Session (over by 6:30-election
day!!)
3 reading group presentations
No Class in RF meet with group members
Summative Reflective Project due in Dropbox
Poster Session-School District Appraisal
FINAL e-Resource/Google Site Due
No Class in RF
Course Description:
This course will introduce multi-tiered systems of service delivery in schools. Three strands of service
delivery will be included: 1) academic/cognitive, 2) behavioral/social, and 3) mental health/emotional.
Emphasis will be on Tier One of a Three-Tiered system. Tier One focuses on universal strategies for
prevention and early intervention services in all strands. Topics will include evidence-informed
curriculum and other services or interventions available to all school students. The roles and goals of
school-based mental health professionals will be emphasized.
Course Structure:
The instructional format of this course will include lecture (face-to-face and online via D2Ls
Collaborate), discussion, demonstration, practice, and readings. Most importantly, this class will
require extensive collaboration. Students will find that a large amount of time outside of class is
required to complete this course successfully. Each student needs to be aware of this situation and to
budget her or his time accordingly. All learning is assessed via periodic in-class formative assessments
(which take different formats), written work, presentations to the class, etc. I ENCOURAGE students to
bring and use personal technology! There are many opportunities to look up information on the
fly and share it with the class. The use of personal email and social media (including texting) during
class time is discouraged (see use of technology during class section below)
Required Reading:
Primary Texts:
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to
Achievement (1st Ed). Routledge.
McIntosh, K., and Goodman, S. (2016). Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Blending RTI
and PBIS 1st Edition. Gilford.
AND. Pick ONE for small group study and presentation (groups of 3)
Masterminds and Wingmen: Helping our Boys Cope with Schoolyard Power, Locker-Room Tests,
Girlfriends, and the New Rules of Boy World by Rosalind Wiseman (2014)
Pushout: The Criminalization of Black Girls in Schools by Monique Morris (2016)
Queen Bees and Wannabes, 3rd Edition: Helping your Daughter Survive Cliques, Gossip, Boys,
and the New Realities of Girl World by Rosalind Wiseman (2016)
Redefining Realness: My Path to Womanhood, Identity, Love & So Much More by Janet Mock
(2014)
The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down: A Hmong Child, Her American Doctors, and the
Collision of Two Cultures by Anne Fadiman (2012)
The Distance Between Us: A Memoir by Reyna Grande (2013)
We Should All Be Feminists & Purple Hibiscus by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (2015)
5
Students must request a grade of Incomplete, using the programs incomplete request form.
Incompletes are not automatically granted.
Per university policy 8.2.18.1, a grade of incomplete (I) may be given for a verifiable, non-academic
reason at the instructors discretion upon student request. If the student does not complete the
coursework and an A-F grade is not given within two semesters (excluding J-term and summer terms)
the course grade becomes an F. See Instructor Preference paragraph (8.2.18.4) below for exceptions to
this rule. When a student completes the work, the incomplete (I) grade is replaced with the new grade
(A-F). The notation for I and SP is taken off of the students records when the course work is completed.
The student is responsible for being aware of the financial aid implications of his or her grades.
Additionally, per university policy 8.2.18.2, a grade of satisfactory progress (SP) may be given by the
instructor when the work of the course extends logically or for pedagogical reasons beyond the end of
the term. The instructor will give the SP after assessing that the work to date demonstrates progress. If
the work is not completed at the conclusion of two semesters (excluding J-term and summer terms) and
the instructor does not submit a grade, the course grade becomes an F. The student is responsible for
being aware of the financial aid implications of his or her grades.
Candidates carrying two or more I grades will be unable to register for additional coursework. Please,
be aware, many program classes are offered only one time per year. A delay in registration may delay
progress through the program by one full year. Candidates may not carry any incompletes at the time
of graduation (M.S.E. and Ed.S.). Additionally, per university policy, all Incomplete (I) or Satisfactory
Progress (SP) grades will automatically lapse to a Failure (F) grade after two completed semesters
beyond the semester the I or SP was issued.
Additional Comments re: Incompletes: You are encouraged to stay with the due date schedule as noted.
Late work has a tendency to pile up quickly, as assignments are due weekly. Late work also delays
feedback. The feedback is critical to the learning that takes place and can be used for later
assignments.
Finally, the schedule experienced in this course mimics that of a practicing school psychologist in many
ways. Your ability to organize your work and persist through unknowns reflects early life as a school
psychologist. The faculty will observe your ability to work within such a system during this course and
other courses (measured, in part, by the Professional Work Characteristics rubric found in the Program
Handbook). Please see me early in the semester if you are struggling to keep pace or need assistance
in any way. All assignments must be submitted in order to pass the course, even if not submitting them
would still result in an overall percentage of points that would be considered passing.
Inclusivity Expectations and Academic Policies:
The UWRF promotes safe, inclusive and effective learning environments that protect the rights and
support the interests of both students and faculty. For additional information regarding our inclusivity
expectations, academic accommodations, academic conduct expectations and processes, and other
syllabi information, please consult http://go.uwrf.edu/Syllabi. This site contains the inclusivity
expectations and academic policies and procedures to which all staff and students are accountable.
The University of Wisconsin-River Falls strives to maintain our campus as a place of work and
study for faculty, staff, and students that is free of all forms of prohibited discrimination and
harassment. If you have concerns about such behavior, contact your instructor, the Office of
Student Conduct and Community Standards at 715-425-0720, or the Office of Equity, Diversity,
and Inclusion at 715-425-3833. For a list of prohibited behaviors and protected classes or to
report something that is inappropriate using an online process, please use
this form: http://www.uwrf.edu/EquityDiversityInclusion/incident.cfm.
The University of Wisconsin-River Falls welcomes students with disabilities into its educational
programs, activities, residential halls, and everything else it offers. Those who will need
academic adjustments or accommodations for a disability should contact the Ability Services
Office. Decisions to allow adjustments and accommodations are made by the Ability Services
Office on the basis of clinical documentation that students provide to sufficiently indicate the
nature of their situation.
Academic Misconduct:
Academic misconduct (e.g., cheating, plagiarism) will not be tolerated in this class. For further
information regard academic misconduct, refer to the UWRF Student Handbook available online at
http://www.uwrf.edu/policies/welcome.htm#discipline. Plagiarism is the unauthorized use of another
persons work, or the misrepresentation of another persons work as your own. Specific examples
include but are not limited to: purchasing a research paper, reusing a paper/assignment written by
another student, copying directly out of a book without proper citation, improper citation of direct
quotes, or paraphrasing without proper credit given to the source. Any work that is plagiarized will be
given zero credit and the student will be reported in violation of the Student Honor Code.
Illness Epidemic Policy:
School psychology program requirements and expectations cannot be excused due to an H1N1 virus or
other illness epidemic. In the event a student contracts the H1N1 virus or other extended illness, the
student may receive a grade of Incomplete (I) until all requirements are properly met. Practicum
students are expected to complete all 600 hours and interns are expected to complete all 1,200 hours
of the required field-based experiences, even if it requires continuing the field experience into an
additional school year. Should a practicum students or interns field-based supervisor become ill for an
extended length of time, another appropriately credentialed supervisor with three or more years of
experience must be assigned immediately. Missed field-supervision hours may necessitate extending
the field experience beyond the normal time frame. Practicum students and interns are encouraged to
have a backup supervisor identified early in the fall semester. Should the H1N1 virus or other illness
become problematic at UW-RF or the surrounding areas, the School Psychology Program faculty will
utilize flexibility in terms of due dates and attendance. However, please, check with each individual
professor for specific expectations.
Required reading:
Readings are identified related to each topic in the class schedule. The Required Text is not optional.
Students are expected to attend all lectures and complete assigned readings prior to class sessions.
Each student will be responsible to teach classmates about their portion of the readings each week,
so falling behind on required reading has a negative impact for every student in the class. The
instructors lectures will not be exclusively based upon textbook readings, but rather, designed to
complement and expand upon that which was covered in the text. It will be much easier to grasp
lecture material (and to ask questions if you need clarification) if you keep up with assigned readings.
The instructor reserves the right to institute quizzes based on readings as part of the participation
grade should students demonstrate difficulty independently managing this requirement.
Grades and Grading Policies:
7
This class will be taught on the basis of a learning mastery model. Students will therefore be
required to demonstrate a mastery of material covered during the course by achieving no less than a
grade of B- or 80% on all assigned work. If a grade of less than B- is received on any single
assignment, students are required to:
a. Meet with course instructor to review those factors that contributed to less than satisfactory
performance and develop a plan of action to correct them, and
b. Resubmit the assignment.
Students will be given two additional opportunities to demonstrate mastery (i.e., achieve a grade of
B-) following submission and initial grading of assignments. If a grade of B- is still not attained, the
highest grade attained will be recorded and used in determining a final grade. This policy applies to all
work undertaken as part of this course. Re-submission of assignments that do not meet mastery
criteria is a required part of this course. Failure to take part in this process will result in 0%
of possible points for the assignment in question and probable failure of the course.
Final grades will be calculated by adding the number of points students receive for completed work.
Final grades will be determined as indicated below:
94 100%
90 93.9%
87 89.9%
83 86.9%
80 82.9%
Below 80%
=
=
=
=
=
=
A
AB+
B
BF
You will work in small groups (~3) to complete this assignment. Each group member will
thoroughly read the groups selection. Then you will work collaboratively to develop a short
(~15 min, no more than 20 min) presentation for the class. This presentation will address the
following issues:
-
8
-
Your hypothesized intent for the authors writing of this book (what did the author want us to know or
do based on this information?)
As a school psychologist or school counselor, what main point(s) stood out to you or challenged your
assumptions?
After reading this book, what implications rise to the surface for educators including school based
mental health professionals? (what do educators need to know?)
What are two or three things (or more!) that schools could do to support persons who are similar to
those represented by your book choice? What could a complete MTSS system include so that its
supportive of members of this population?
Would you recommend this book? If so, for whom? Why?
NOTE: Your grade will be based on both ratings from the instructor (50%) and an
average of your classmates ratings (50%)
2
9
NOTE: Your grade will be based on both ratings from the instructor (50%) and an
average of your classmates ratings (50%)
3
10
Students will individually complete the Vanderbilt University Iris modules on RtI and complete a
short quiz (open-book/open-computer) based on the content.
Successful completion of these modules will include:
- Individual review of all online materials
- Individual completion of a short open-resource quiz about module content (upload to D2L)
5
Summative Reflective Project Checklist for Evaluating MTSS models in schools (25
Points)
Individually or in groups, students will develop a checklist of essential features of MTSS learned
throughout this course. Your checklist can take the form of a simple checklist or a more
complex rubric where levels of implementation can be rated and/or next steps can be
prioritized. This checklist should be no longer than 4 pages long; however, if your
design/formatting requires a longer document, just let me know! The idea is to identify things
that are essential to an MTSS system not everything that could be part of one. Be sure to
include things from your small group book readings/presentations!
2.
Topic
Date
Sept
9/13 -
Introduction to course
Review syllabus and assignments
Community expectations
Forming groups for projects
What is MTSS?
- Three faces of the pyramid
- Introduce Hatties Work (quiz re:
Variables Impacting Student
Achievement)
9/20
Google site tutorial
Necessary components at each
Tier
- Instruction/intervention
- Data systems
- Problem-solving systems
Digging into The first face -
Due
In Class:
http://rtinetwork.org/essential/tieredin
struction/tier1/accurate-decisionmaking-within-a-multi-tier-system-ofsupports-critical-areas-in-tier-1
Iris Modules:
- RtI (Part 1): An Overview
- RtI (Part 3): Reading Instruction
- High Quality Mathematics Instruction: What
Teachers Should Know
Readings:
11
Academics Tier 1
- State Standards Activity
- Discussion re: Hatties book
3.
9/27
Be ready to share
out about your
info!
Get started on
your BIG
project!!!!
Readings:
-McIntosh & Goodman: Chapter 1:
Introduction
-An Analysis of Evidence-Based Teaching
Practices from Meta-Analyses 2000 to
2014 for Kindergarten through Middle
School (Burchard)
-Hattie - (Divide between reading groups
or group members)
Chapter 6: The Contributions from the
School
Chapter 7: The Contributions from the
Teacher
Chapter 8: The Contributions from the
Curricula
Chapter 9: The Contributions from
Teaching Approaches (part 1)
Chapter 10: The Contributions from
Teaching Approaches (part 2)
4.
10/4
5.
10/1
1
e-Resource shell
due
Readings:
-McIntosh & Goodman: Chapter 2 The
Relationship Between Academic Skills and
Behavior
-Best practices in Developing a Broad-Scale
system of School-Wide positive Behavior
Support (Sugai, Horner, & McIntosh) BP
5
-Best Practices in Social Skills Training
(Frey, Elliott, & Miller) BP 6
-Hattie:
Chapter 4 The Contributions from the
Student
Chapter 5 The Contributions from the
Home
Readings:
Each group pick one of the following
to review AND develop a SHORT
summary or graphic to share with the
group online
12
6.
10/18
7.
10/25
See suggested
timeline and plan
accordingly
Group Reading
Presentations (2)
Your interviews
should be mostly
done by this point
AND you should
have already
attended a school
board meeting
Bullying
- Best Practices in Bullying Prevention (Felix,
Green, & Sharkey)
- A Framework for School-wide Bullying
Prevention and Safety
http://www.nasponline.org/resources/bullying/bullying_brief_12.pdf
8.
11/1
Group Reading
Presentations
(5)
13
9.
11/8
-
10. 11/15
9
11/22
Group Reading
Presentations (3)
Summative
Reflective
Project/Checklist
due in Dropbox
(NO CLASS IN RF
TONIGHT)
11. 11/29
12. 12/6
13. 12/13
14. 12/20
Group Presentations
Or Poster Session
Tying it all together
- What did we learn from Ecological
Appraisals?
- How has this helped our
understanding of MTSS evolve?
- Future Directions for MTSS
Readings:
- Best practices in Professional
Development: An Integrated, Three-Tier
model of Academic and Behavior
supports. (Stollar, Schaeffer, Skelton,
Stine, Lateer-Huhn, & Poth) BP 5
- McIntosh & Goodman:
Chapter 6 Integrating District Support
Systems
Chapter 7 Integrating Entire Systems
Final E-Resource
due (confirm link
is correct in the
Dropbox)
14
15
The UWRF School Psychology Program curriculum was designed with the NASP Practice Model in mind.
Upon completion of the program, school psychology students will have experienced numerous
opportunities to gain knowledge and emerging skills related to all components of the NASP Practice
Model. A key aspect of the NASP Practice Model is the inclusion of performance-based Domains of
School Psychology Training and Practice that guide future performance based reviews and outcomes of
training for students. School psychology graduate students use the following information to guide the
development of the candidate programmatic portfolio. The highlighted domains below reflect NASP
graduate education domains met through the requirements of this course, SPSY 620 Intro To MultiTiered Systems of Support:
Practices That Permeate All Aspects of Service Delivery
Domain 1: Data-Based Decision Making and Accountability
School psychologists have knowledge of varied models and methods of assessment and data
collection for identifying strengths and needs, developing effective services and programs, and
measuring progress and outcomes.
Domain 2: Consultation and Collaboration
School psychologists have knowledge of varied models and strategies of consultation,
collaboration, and communication applicable to individuals, families, groups, and systems and
methods to promote effective implementation of services.
Direct and Indirect Services for Children, Families, and Schools
Student-Level Services:
Domain 3: Interventions and Instructional Support to Develop Academic Skills
School psychologists have knowledge of biological, cultural, and social influences on academic
skills; human learning, cognitive, and developmental processes; and evidence-based curricula
and instructional strategies.
Domain 4: Interventions and Mental Health Services to Develop Social and Life Skills
School psychologists have knowledge of biological, cultural, developmental, and social
influences on behavior and mental health, behavioral and emotional impacts on learning and
life skills, and evidence-based strategies to promote socialemotional functioning and mental
health.
Systems-Level Services:
Domain 5: School-Wide Practices to Promote Learning
School psychologists have knowledge of school and systems structure, organization,
16
and theory; general and special education; technology resources; and evidencebased school practices that promote learning and mental health.
Domain 6: Preventive and Responsive Services
School psychologists have knowledge of principles and research related to resilience and risk
factors in learning and mental health, services in schools and communities to support
multitiered prevention, and evidence-based strategies for effective crisis response.
Domain 7: FamilySchool Collaboration Services
School psychologists have knowledge of principles and research related to family systems,
strengths, needs, and culture; evidence-based strategies to support family influences on
childrens learning and mental health; and strategies to develop collaboration between families
and schools.
17
18
Ecological Appraisal of a School District: Group Research and Poster Session
(200 points)
(addl info and guidance)
19
Reduced Price Meals? Special Education? Other kinds of academic supports? What is the student
to teacher ratio in the classrooms?
In addition to general education teachers, who would you identify as key resources for supporting
student success?
Does your school have a Multi-Tiered System of Support for Academics? Social/Behavioral learning?
Mental Health? If so, describe.
Describe parent involvement at your school. What are strengths and barriers to partnerships with
parents?
Describe how problems about student learning are solved at the school. Are there any teams in
place that address group or individual issues? (e.g., PLCs, SAT, Child Study, building leadership
teams, etc.)
What is the process for determining whether a new intervention or strategy is needed to address
student needs? How is a new intervention or strategy implemented and sustained?
What do you think that the greatest challenges to public education will be over the next five years?
How is your building preparing to meet those challenges?
What kind of support is available to your building from the District Office?
Does your building have a comprehensive crisis prevention and response plan? Do you have an
active crisis response team? What kind of training has been done (or is done regularly) with regard
to this plan?
Role-Specific Issues:
- Describe a typical day for you at this school.
- What might your best day look like here at this school?
- What might your most challenging day look like?
- Describe the different supports in place at this school for students needing tiered interventions.
- How does your role fit into a Multi-Tiered System of Support here?
- What needs do you think could be addressed differently? If resources were limitless, what changes
might you make with regard to student supports?
- Are you a member of your buildings crisis response team?
- What other teams or committees do you serve on?
Note that it may be beneficial to select school districts that typically partner with UWRF for practicum
and/or internship as the information obtained by your group AND your colleagues may help you as you
prepare for interviews in the future!
20
E-Resource (50 points)
Students will develop a dynamic e-resource that will house various tools for professional practice as
they move through their programs at UWRF. Students are encouraged to use Google Sites for this
project; however, other web site applications or wikis WILL be accepted, BUT a Google Docs or One
Drive folder will NOT suffice.
Here is some guidance for developing a Google Site:
There are MANY support videos on YouTube, but some are quite long and others give more info than I
think you'd want if you are a beginner. I found two short ones that should get you started pretty well:
Here is one that comes from Lynda.com. It reviews how to start a google site from a template:
http://youtu.be/kiG6OEftkJQ
Here is a short one that gives BASIC info about how to edit a page from a site template:
http://youtu.be/POAWJ8XyUYI
These two should give you a basis for (1) setting up your site from a gallery template, and (2) editing
the content on a template to meet your needs.
If/when you are ready for more, feel free to search YouTube (or other sources) for more tutorials. :-)
There are also a few 'easy' templates to edit. Take a look and do some exploring on your own, too!
Note that these are just suggestions - you are free to build this however you'd like.
21
22
Online Class Participation Guidelines
General guidance for Online Discussion Posts:
Please push yourself beyond praise for each others ideas. Consider selecting specific elements
of a post and noting WHY that element resonates with you... or doesn't. Disagreeing with each
other in writing can make everyone feel vulnerable, however. Without the assistance of body
language and voice tone to help interpret our words, there is the risk of misinterpretation and
damage to relationships. However, our different backgrounds and perspectives can give us
vastly different opinions about key course issues. These differences, if discussed with care and
compassion, can enrich the learning experiences for everyone. So I encourage you to challenge
others thinking and perspectives in our discussions; however, please do so in a way that honors
each persons unique experiences. Remember to disagree with ideas, not people. When you
have a difference of opinion, consider explicitly sharing why you may think or feel differently
about a topic. This may include stating what personal or professional experiences led you to
think the way you do about something. Some tips for disagreeing in email and via forums such
as this from Dale Carnegie training include the following: (summarized from
http://boston.dalecarnegie.com/blog/main/four-tips-for-disagreeing-agreeably/)
1. Give others the benefit of the doubt. You may disagree strongly about some point, but
always ask yourself: What do I know about the individual both in an historical and situational
perspective that might justly explain why they have the opinions they do? (sometimes we
refer to this as assuming positive intent if you do this, you can slow down a defensive or
overly negative response and keep your feedback positive and respectful)
2. Avoid using these words: "but", "however" and "nevertheless". If you acknowledge the other
individuals point of view and follow it what one of these words, you have completely erased
the acknowledgement. (consider using words like and instead. This leaves room for both
ideas to co-exist)
3. Use empathy to cushion your response. Never attack another persons idea head-on. If you
disagree, acknowledge that you have heard their opinion, and follow it with a empathetic
comment. ("I can understand why you are bringing that because of XYZ"). With this
statement of empathy, you dont need to agree or disagree, but rather simply demonstrate
your understanding for their "side." From this point of commonality, you can then move on
to illustrate your own feelings on the subject. (remember, though dont follow this up with
but, however, etc., or you negate your empathy).
By following these simple suggestions for our discussion boards, we will be able to have
meaningful discussions that move beyond agreements and help us embrace the learning that
can come from dissonance.