Professional Documents
Culture Documents
أثر خصائص المنظمة المتعلمة في تحقيق التميز المؤسسي
أثر خصائص المنظمة المتعلمة في تحقيق التميز المؤسسي
<<
"!
'&%
#$
"( )
,* #$
.!/
=<;89: 3.4
67$2!10#
> 0
"?#!,
<0C,@
* !,
="D?#!,
G E$ H I
L #M <NJE O@,C<0$Q "#$
%&' " 8 JK=$
J
! 3 #W X,O
S (,3 TU3
< V3 . 7
KY.Z
C=
V#=
YJ$
!89:;C=$J
?# .4I # W
J#,_^.D
2010 / 5 / NE# O30`
K=$
C=
V&a!
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
#
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
QC<
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
0#$a!
e.7/#$ *
( 7 E I
fg.
'&%
#$
&:h
......... i"
KKKKKK
$&'KKKKKK"#$%
0'KKKKKK")*+,-./
...bY0?kb:jDU
#$ %&'
|
= 3E$ l
$n$
_H
GE$HI
o
=
V#
= C
(7 EI
:h&
:
= 3E$ l
=V
=7(,
=
gr
sOS O
sOS Edh
uH,W#Zh#
)1W(1
<
)17C<W(2# Y T
)1:W(3#
)1:W(4)#
)1 3nQW(5#
)1gW(6#
)1/W(73#
)1W(8 3HE0h
3_4#
10
= 3E$ l
$n$
_H
13
)2W(1
<
14
)2
:H<u<W(2
14
)2 :H<u<W(3
31
)2W(4#3OO . 0,
40
)2v<W(5#M!2#3 O
52
uHW^fE40h& 3
53
)3W(1
<
54
)3wY <W(2#
54
55
)3$yW(4#
55
)3W(53#<#$2!1
3<$
57
)3W(6
Vgh
<S
59
)3zW(7?# YI.
60
62
)4W(1
<
63
63
)4W(3 3nQ#.#
77
= 3E$ l
_H
$n$
uH|<{W30
6 3z$
98
)5W(1
<
99
99
)5W(3 30 6
101
)5W(4 3z$
101
=
K0
103
W6
K0 O
104
W J
K0 .
0,
106
=
gr
112
|
=V
D=#D=#LuHV
$n$
3 1
fb^Mce!cd-!..(?
-
3 2
4 1
4 2
4 3
4 4
4 5
4 6
4 7
4 8
4 9
_H
56
61
^eDi@!he.^
:jD,k$,
64
^eDi@!he.^
:jD,k$,
65
^eDi@!he.^
:jD,k$,
66
^eDi@!he.^
:jD,k$,
67
^eDi@!he.^
:jD,k$,
69
^eDi@!he.^
:ljD,
71
^eDi@!he.^
:ljD,
72
^eDi@!he.^
:ljD,
73
^eDi@!he.^
:ljD,
75
(L0
bR^!
bRDi
!.bR T
bR= +
bR@%
-
-^D
:!9
- e
-^! .
=V
D=#D=#LuHV
4 10
4 11
4 12
4 13
4 14
4 15
4 16
$n$
_H
^eDi@!he.^
:ljD,
76
mK,lT
Rk$,
78
mK,lT
Rk$,
79
mK,lT
Rk$,
80
mK,lT
Rk$,
81
mK,lT
Rk$,
82
mK,lT
Rk$,
83
-^
;K%R^?>^
bR^!
bRDi
!.bR T
bR= +
bR@%D Tb
To
R@-h
^-;K%n^?>^
4 17
loq^p
84
mK;K%RMar
R^?>^('lo
4 18
qG
86
=V
D=#D=#LuHV
$n$
_H
mK;K%RMar
R^?>^('lo
4 19
D^q
:!9
88
mK;K%RMar
R^?>^('lo
4 20
q
92
mK;K%RMar
R^?>^('lo
4 21
q^!
93
22 J4
mK;K%R
R^?>^('loq
^
96
|
7(,=
_H
$n$
u7CD=#LuHD=#
23
^?>MarquardtDt0
1 J 2
28
^^?>:DuDt0
2 J 2
29
^=^?>I
3 J 2
55
-Dt0
1 J 3
|
=
gr
_H
D=#
_
$n$
1
ZvrKO +=w
113
2
0
-)@
(
114
|
#.4I?# D^_.#, J
"!
'&%
#$
"( )
,* #$
.!/
sOS O
)
( )
q^ (y
.
) (50
.
.SPSS
) (194 .
:
.1
) (
.
.2
)
( .
.3
).(0.05
.4
).(0.05
.5 )
(
).(0.05
.6 )
(
).(0.05
ABSTRACT
The Impact of Learning Organization Characteristics in
Achieveing Organizational Excellence
Applied Study on the Ministry of Higher Education in Jordan
Prepared by
Asma Salem AL-Nosour
Supervisor
Prof. Dr.
Mohammad Al - Nuiami
This study aimed at revealing the impact of intangible Learning
Organization Characteristics (Continuous Learning; Dialogue; Team Work;
Empowerment and Communication) in achieveing Organizational Excellence
(Leadership; Human Resource; Process; Knowledge and Financial Excellence).
In order to achieve the objective of the study, the researcher designed a
questionnaire consisting of (50) paragraphs to gather the primary information
from study sample. The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS)
Programming was used to analyze, examine the hypotheses. The study sample
consisted of (194) of the Ministry employees campaign Bachelor and above.
|
The study used many statistical methods such as simple and multi
regression to achieve study objectives. After executing the analysis to study
hypotheses; the sudy concluded that:
i.
According to the findings of the study, the researcher list bellows the
most important are recommendations:
1. Commitment of the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific
Research of Jordan to promote the process of continuous interaction with
the beneficiary groups and to achieve satisfaction by introducing the draft
programs and SMS services.
2. Improve the operations of the Ministry of Higher Education and
Scientific Research of Jordan through adoption TQM and re-engineering
business processes; and the competition based on operations.
|
@ @a@a
@ @a@ba@ba
<
W(1 1)
Y T#7C<W(2 1)
#:W(3 1)
#):W(4 1)
#3nQW(5 1)
#gW(6 1)
#3/W(7 1)
#3_4
0h3HE W(8 1)
1|
) 1 W(1
<
.
.
.
)
( .
) & Buckley
Excellence
.
) Learning
Continuousdialogue Team
Empowerment (Communication
Leadership Resource
)
HumanProcess
.
|3
) 1 7C<W(2# Y T
.
.
.
.
.
*7 C<#Y"M7v H J#r M <&r 0f*?#$O" !?#< M
36 W
|4
<j]<]<^}<]<]<ovf]<^]<j]<]<j]<j<^ W6
]<]<ovf]<^]<j]<]<<]<j]<^e_<fi<j<^ W J
){{j]<{{]<^{{<{{m_<^{{<{{W fyy^!yyDyyi
!yy.Tyy
=+@%D) < ]<j]< (Tb^D
:!9e
^!.^(<]<]<ovf]<^]<j]<]
) 1 : W(3#
:
.1
.2 ) Learning
Continuous
|5
) 1 : W(4)#
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
|6
) 1 3nQW(5#
:
nH<,HO1 i
" 6?# D^_.#,J
)
( "
:
6 :HO1-1?# D^_.#,zJ D
K
6 :HO1-2?# D^_.#,zJ$2 K#
6 :HO1-3?# D^_.#,QzJ Ku
6 :HO1-4?# D^_.#,zJ K7
6 :HO1-5?# D^_.#,zJI6 $ Kuz
<nH<HO2 Jf
"0$E 6|g"6
) D
$ 2# Q
u 7I6 $ (uz
)?
$#EC.3
Q
(?# D^_.#,J"
:
|7
0$E6 :HO2-1|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+@%D_ O(Tb b?# D^_.#,
!J
< $K(0.05)6
0$E6 :HO2-2|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+ @% D _ O (Tb $
O# EC. ?# D ^_.
#,$ <
!JK(0.05)6
0$E6 :HO2-3|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+@% D_ O (Tb I?# D^_.#,J
!
< $K(0.05)6
0$E6 :HO2-4|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+@% D_ O (Tb
?# D^_.#,
! J
< $K(0.05)6
0$E6 :HO2-5|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+@% D _ O (Tb
?# D ^_. #,
! J
< $K(0.05)6
|8
) 1 g W(6#
. :
2W EC .
.
2
WJ7 .
2< WJ
.2010 2009
2 W
) (Watkins & Marsicks, 1997) 7 D
$2 # Q u 7
I6 $ .(uz
)?
$#EC.3
Q
( )
.(2008
) 1 / W(73#
:
.1
.
|9
.2 .
.3
.
) 1 W(8 3HE0h
3_4#
WLearning Organization
).(Marqwardt, 2002
D
WContinuous Learning
| 10
I6 $ WDynamism uz
) & Watkins
.(Marsicks, 1997
W
).(2001
? WLeadership
)^ .(2002GDD
$#WHuman ResourceEC.
).(Armstrong, 2006
3
WProcess
)B
|: .(2009uc
WKnowledge Q
) & Alavi
.(Leidner, 2001
| 11
WFinancial Excellence
)B
|:uc
.(2009
| 12
@ @bra@a
@ @iba@pbaa@a@ba@@@@
<
W(1 2)
:H<u<W(2 2)
:H<u<W(3 2)
.
0,OO3#W(4 2)
O3#M!2#v<W(5 2)
13 |
) 2 W(1
<
)(Huber, 1991: 2006: 93
.
).(237 :2008
) 2
:H<u<W(2
).(Marsick & Watkins, 2003: 147
) (Senge, 1994: 4
| 14
).(Drejer, 2000: 206-207
) (Dewar & Whittington, 2004
) (Laurarealph, 2004
) (Yang, et..al, 2004
) (73 :2001
: .
) (Rowden, 2001
) .(7 :2002 ) (Foster, 2001: 7
| 15
) (Marqwardt, 2002: 2
.
) (Bleed, 2004: 1
)
(61 :2006
.
.
| 16
) 2 2 W(1i"02
.
) (Thomas & Allen, 2006: 123-139
) (Haque, 2008: 15-26
:
) (1
100
).(Marqwardt, 2002: 1 - 3
.
) (2
Information Technology
.
| 17
) (3
.
.
.
) (4
.
).(121 :2004
| 18
) (5
.
.
) (6
) (
.
.
.
.
| 19
) 2 2 W(2
) .(Murray, 2003: 306
.
): (Marqwardt, 2002: 32) (Cook, et..al, 1997: 33
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5 .
.6 .
.7 .
.8 .
.9 .
.10 .
.11 .
| 20
) (Kelley, et..al, 2007: 206
.
) 114 :2004 (119
.
) 2 2 yW(3
.
) .(rtenblad, 2004: 129-144
:
.1 Senge
) (Senge, 1990
Senge
):(Senge, 2006
| 21
1 1 System Thinking
.
1 2 Personal Mastery
.
1 3 Mental Models
.
1 4 Shared Vision
.
1 5 Team Learning
.
.2 Marquardt
) (Marquardt, 1996: 23
.
: .
| 22
) 2 .(1
) 2 (1
Marquardt
2 1
. ) (Marquardt, 2002: 24-26 :
.
2 2
) (Marquardt,2002: 27 :
.
| 23
2 3
.
.
.
2 4
.
).(Orlando, et..al,2007: 57
2 5
.
| 24
.3 Redding
62 :1997) Redding (66 .
Naperville .
:
.1
) (
.
.2
.
.3
.
) (Redding, 1997:63
:
:
- .
- .
- .
- .
| 25
- .
) (Kontoghiorghes, et..al, 2005: 188
:
.
.4 Addleson
) (Addleson, 1998: 5-6
The Four Axioms . Addleson
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
| 26
.5 AL - Otaibi
) (AL-Otaibi, 2000
.
.
:
.
.
) (AL-Otaibi, 2000: 116 . ) 2 (2
. :
.1 )
(.
.2 )
(.
| 27
.3 )
( .
) 2 (2
.6 James
) (James, 2003
The learning Organization Web
| 28
. ) 2 .(3
) 2 (3
.
) (
| 29
)(James, 2003: 46
.
.1 :
.
.2 :
.
.3 :
.
.4 :
.
.5 :
.
.6 :
.
James, 2003: ) James
| 30
) 2 :H<u<W(3
) 2 3 $YH<W(1:
).(2003
| 31
) .(Pinar & Girard, 2008: 31 ) Nohria, et..al,
(2003: 43
. ) (2003
.
.
) (2003
.
)
(
:
.1 .
| 32
.2
.3
.
.4
.
.
) 2 3 W(2
<e
):(Grote,2002
.1
.
.2
.
| 33
.3
.
.4
.
.5
.
.6 :
.
) (2001
:
.1
.
.2
.
) 2 3 OW(3
$08
:
)W(1
| 34
.
.
).(Borghini,2005
)W(2
.
.
| 35
).(Cristina & Colurcio, 2006
)W(3
.
) 43 :2008
.(54
)W(4
) (Stronmgulst & Samoff, 2000:324
.
.
.
| 36
| 37
)
.(2008
): (Horngren, et..al, 2000: 2
.
.
.
.
.
/
.
Deming
Baldrige
.
| 38
)
.(2003
)W(4
) .(1999
) 2 W(4#3OO.
0,
#3 O
) (2010 " : "
)
(
.
| 40
.
.
| 42
.
) (2006 " "
:
.
) (2004 " "
.
: .
:
| 43
162 55
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
| 44
.2
(
.
.3 .
) (1998 " "
.
.
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
| 45
.4
.
#3 .
06
- ) (Weldy, 2009 " Learning Organization and Transfer: Strategies
| 46
. 1529
)(Watkins and Marsick, 1997
.
- ) (Davis & Daley, 2008 " The Learning Organization and its
| 48
) (Chang & Sun, 2007 " Exploring the Correspondence betweenTotal Quality Management and Peter Senges Disciplines of a Learning
| 49
| 50
) (Kontoghiorghes, et..al, 2005 " Examining the RelationshipBetween Learning Organization Characteristics and Change Adaptation,
? "Practitioner
| 51
.
.
.
.
.
) 2 v<W(5#M!2#3O
:
.1 :
.
.
.2 :
.
| 52
.3 :
.
.
.4 :
.
.
| 53
@ @sbra@a
@ @paaua@a@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
<
W(1 3)
#wY
<W(2 3)
Y
!#K xW(3 3)
#$yW(4 3)
3<$
1!$2#<#3W(5 3)
<S
ghV
W(6 3)
YI.#?zW(7 3)
54 |
) 3 W(1
<
.
.
.
.
.
.
| 55
) (300
) (194.
)3(1
.
) 3 $yW(4#
)3(1
| 56
)3(1
= D
>s
1
2
{ V
3
$
!
$3
4
|<
H$2
!
$3
|<?#
D
^_.
#,J
7#
.
(%)E$T
TH
=
30M<u
32
17
<30M 40
77
40
<41M 50
63
32
f*Q 51
22
11
*
103
53
1fJ
91
47
$E#$7O
112
58
$O!
< > 0
64
33
* #$8
12
=$ 5M<u 3
74
38
52
27
37
19
f*Q 15
31
16
=$ 5M<u 3
54
28
49
25
47
24
f*Q 15
44
23
) 3 (1
.
| 57
) 3 W(53#<#$2!1
3<$
:
.1
.
.2
:
) (6 )(5
!. e^[? )
(.
) ( J ) (5
)
) (25
(.
| 58
(.
.
).(1
Q
E/
6Q
6?COQ
y y :
!H 3
D
$2 #
!.5!.5 ee
Q u
7
!.5e
!.5e
I6
$ uz
!.5e
y y :
$#
?
!H 3
!.5!.5 ee
EC.
3
!.5e
Q
!.5e
!.5e
| 59
) 3 W(6
Vg6
<S
.
) (SPSS
:
Cronbach Alpha .
.
T .
F .ANOVA
:
D=W6Q
-^?~2.33 ,TO0 1 [L
Q
-^3.66 2.33 ,D
Q
-^!.!N3r. 3.67 ,L
| 60
) 3 zW(7?# YI.
(0 b:
.
)(8 )(%100
).(2
(3.?#
.Cronbach Alpha
Alpha
. Cronbach
Alpha .
Alpha ) (Alpha 0.60
) .(Sekaran, 2003 )3.(2
| 61
)3(2
) (
.
= )(H
D
0.742
$2 #
0.716
Q u
0.737
7
0.773
I6 $ uz
0.772
?
0.891
$# EC.
0.859
3
0.885
Q
0.828
10
0.811
= D
u7*J. 6
0.899
)2003
K(Sekaran, ) 3 (2
)(0.773
).(0.772
).(0.716
) (0.891
)(0.811
.
| 62
@ @iaa@a
@ @pba@bjna@zna@wbn
<
W(1 4)
63 |
) 4 W(1
<
.
:
) 4 W(2 $KE 7
!3O0hb##!TM#
$ <<W6< r?# D^_.#, J
9:M!O0=<;M<!$xi"e Ofg.T, W!H
<< $< r?# D^_.#,z|J D
)4 .(1
| 64
)4 :(1
D
= D
1
2
3
4
@$
6)
O2
b#
:II
?H
< $
r <6
-D
!
T _O
=
3.64
1.20
2
< @$
B -3p
D
(' ^! !J
3.59
1.24
< @$
TS
D
(' D%i('
3.63
1.15
3
< @$
' B
D
T AB ,q$
3.49
1.26
5
< @$
e,-n]0-:-!:De,-n i
T PR
-"0=?!QDD
@!QZ:-e e,-n
j-D
PQq:
D,e,$D
^e,D;4^! +Q^,:-L
3.70
1.14
1
<KHI
e,-n^ ,-
@$O26)
b#
3.61
1.20
)4AB (1
D O
.
)3.49.(3.70 "
$Y0?# E#$4 <3<r$3<$
O?#L
0
M< MEH|<3
<"
) (3.70 ) (3.61
) (1.14 " "1I?#$uI i"?#<Mr06&DEI3|< "3
) (3.49
) (3.61 ).(1.26
.
| 65
)4 .(2
)4 :(2
@$
$2 #
= D
6)
:II
O2
b#
?H
< $
r <6
9 6D
T'(7Z[(0?-? Z
3.08
1.03
5
< @$
!.D 7D
X^"DL^ MN
3.10
0.99
< @$
)QDD
UDh PDi
^!
3.20
1.18
1
< @$
!.DD
!.P.+, (L
3.20
0.99
1
< @$
10
3.18
1.03
3
< @$
3.15
1.04
8
+ ).+,
?-O
=.
@$O26)
b#
) 4 (2
AB
z$2.#
| 66
<< $< r?# D^_.#,Qz|Ju
)4 .(3
)4 :(3
Q u
= D
11
12
13
14
15
@$
6)
O2
b#
:II
?H
< $
r <6
j-D
!.(S%%~,T^eP
3.57
1.02
2
< @$
3.28
0.98
< @$
D B
D
!. T=9 , T
3.32
1.00
3
< @$
3.62
1.07
1
< @$
B-3p
D
('e"T=9? (D
3.27
1.07
5
< @$
3.41
1.03
,D
l:!L
-,>?e:D,
^-
@$O26)
b#
)4AB (3
Qzr <O
<< $< r?# D^_.#,z|J 7
)4 .(4
)4 :(4
7
= D
16
17
18
@$
6)
O2
b#
:II
?H
< $
r <6
k
9:D, D
P:
%
3.22
1.08
2
< @$
D
D
0 'I
P. +,
3.77
0.85
<HI
j- +,D
"!- T : (
3.08
0.89
4
< @$
PR@U
^! P
D(-!QSZ e
D: ^ !:-^p (?T,I
D% :- W
19
3
T ,YD,D +, 3
3.00
0.89
5
< @$
? 56L
20
+, :D
3
9 b!L
!
e
@$O26)
b#
3.10
0.89
3.24
0.92
3
< @$
| 68
) 4 (4
AB
z r <O
)4 .(5
| 69
)4 :(5
= D
21
22
@$
I6 $ uz
6)
O2
b#
:II
?H
< $
r <6
!q3D
((-^!.n
3.28
0.90
1
< @$
PD
'(9(LT=9
3.06
0.87
< @$
P,(+
+ P.+,
-(: T=Y?> D
(' ?l
BeP,+ 23
PP,O0^~Le,
^! +Q
24
25
2.97
0.83
5
< @$
W1D
- D=, Lb(eO$
3.06
0.88
3
< @$
!oB
D
('l.-^e,D
3.09
0.94
2
< @$
3.09
0.89
D?Oe@%^D P
+ P.+,
@$O26)
b#
) 4 (5
AB
z r <O
| 70
O.4I$ <<W J
?# D^_.#,J
9:M!O0r=<;M<!$xi"e Ofg.T, W!H
<< .4I$.b?# D^_.#,J
)4 .(6
| 71
)4 :(6
. b
= D
26
27
@$
6)
:II
O2
b#
?H
< $
.4
-3pS
D
(' @q
3.09
0.85
2
< @$
ADS
D
(
3.01
0.63
< @$
[+,^?>^
?>!
?' S
D
-7H
3.05
0.90
4
< @$
PS
D
,O2-
e
29
3.11
0.82
1
< @$
^
30
' S
D
!
AB
-Q.?q3!,lo
@$O26)
b#
3.07
0.87
3.07
0.81
3
< @$
) 4 (6
AB
.4 O.
| 72
<< O.4I$
$#EC.?# D^_.#,J
)4 .(7
)4 :(7
O
$# EC.
= D
31
32
33
34
35
@$
6)
O2
b#
:II
?H
< $
.4
!.D:D
9 X@% DTb
3.19
1.04
2
< @$
P:D, D
D3
9:T=9
3.06
0.71
< @$
XD
(-+,@PK^D
3.04
0.92
5
< @$
D:D,D
(- ^T,3
3.18
0.88
3
< @$
j- +,D
|= ):DO (?O
3.20
0.75
1
< @$
3.13
0.86
^,!I^! +
!
$
D !:
PPQD@ Yl(Z
@$O26)
b#
) 4 AB (7
O.4 O
$#
) (3.04 ) (3.13
) .(0.92
.
<< O.4I$3?# D^_.#,J
)4 .(8
)4 :(8
= D
O 3
@$
6)
O2
b#
:II
?H
< $
.4
D D
!Q2ZH!!, e($
3.47
0.92
1
< @$
3.36
0.79
< @$
-D
('TKD=?QDDN:-i
3.26
0.79
4
< @$
39
!QBZ:-e(!e,-n!"
3.34
0.89
3
< @$
40
DD
!O!,'(!,T=9P.
3.03
0.81
5
< @$
3.29
0.84
36
37
38
('"eQ^!+Q^? (D
(\`e :!,+o
P,-R:-
:-e+ e,-n
@$O26)
b#
| 74
) 4 (8
AB
.3O
<< O.4I$
Q?# D^_.#,J
)4 .(9
) 4 (9
AB
.Q
O
| 75
)4 :(9
O
Q
= D
41
D D
T:D
e^! e,D
(L$P?,D%i('^! ..
@$
6)
O2
b#
3.65
0.81
:II
?H
1
< $
.4
< @$
W1D
!.0 P:-T" '(
-
42^T39^!(@Y(r('RP
ZL3 .P
3.27
0.85
< @$
W1D
^! .=D? . @e@%
43 Q
n- l? R^ eP^!
.Y(r
44
~- D
=? e,D, QDDM=L
@=
S"D ..!,
3.32
0.91
3
< @$
3.31
0.76
4
< @$
9D
(',OBei?+I
45
^ POJ
N@ +LD :!=L@e
3.33
0.86
2
< @$
^! ..
@$O26)
b#
3.38
0.84
| 76
<< .4I$.
?# D^_.#,J
)4 .(10
)4 :(10
.
= D
46
47
48
49
50
@$
6)
O2
b#
:II
?H
< $
.4
j-D
D,
c .3 ,
3.41
0.84
1
< @$
D D
:f= >?,
3.20
0.84
< @$
[ D
|:,` f
3.02
0.94
5
< @$
q D
PL
-IUS
:!
3.27
0.76
2
< @$
qD
2
D -Qe.-
3.21
0.92
3
< @$
3.22
0.86
"PQ .c9
.P,-R
-70P.^ .
('=PLc9
? .:-
@$O26)
b#
) 4 (10
AB
.
O
| 77
) 4 W(3 3nQ#.#
T :
nH<,HO1 i
" 6?# D^_.#,J
"
T
)4.(11
| 78
)4mK
(11lT
R
.
@$
h)
DF
* Sig
< $
O2
b# O$lV 30#E2
6
3.300
8.574
0.488
1.282
193
0.000
)4 (11
.
T)(8.574
) ( 0.05 T ) .(1.282
:
?# D^_.#,J
$ <
!D6
)(0.05
T :
| 79
:HO1-1
) .(0.05
T
)4.(12
)4mK
(12lT
R
.
@$
h)
DF
O2
b# O$lV 30#E2
* Sig
< $
6
3.611
8.703
0.978
1.282
193
0.000
)4 (12
.
T) (8.703
) ( 0.05 T ) .(1.282
:
)(0.05
| 80
:HO1-2
) .(0.05
T
)4.(13
)4mK
(13lT
R
.
@$
h)
DF
O2
b# O$lV 30#E2
* Sig
< $
6
3.150
2.876
0.728
1.282
193
0.004
#,zJ$2 #
)4 (13
.
T) (2.876 )( 0.05
T ) .(1.282
:
| 81
:HO1-3
) .(0.05
T
)4.(14
)4mK
(14lT
R
.
@$
h)
DF
O2
b# O$lV 30#E2
* Sig
< $
6
3.412
7.157
0.802
1.282
193
0.000
u
)4 (14
.
T) (7.157
) ( 0.05 T ) .(1.282
:
?# D ^ _. #, Q z J $ < !u 6
)(0.05
| 82
:HO1-4
) .(0.05
T
)4.(15
)4mK
(15lT
R
.
@$
h)
DF
O2
b# O$lV 30#E2
* Sig
< $
6
3.235
5.345
0.612
1.282
193
0.000
7
)4 (15
.
T) (5.345 )( 0.05
T ) .(1.282
:
| 83
:HO1-5
) .(0.05
T
)4.(16
)4mK
(16lT
R
.
@$
h)
DF
O2
b# O$lV 30#E2
* Sig
< $
6
3.092
2.129
0.607
1.282
193
0.035
I6 $ uz
)4 (16
.
T) (2.129
) ( 0.05 T ) .(1.282
:
(0.05)6
| 84
<nH<HO2 Jf
"0$E 6|g"6
) D
$ 2 # Q u
7I (J,
)?
$#EC.3
Q
(?# D^_.#,J
) 4 .(17
) 4 (17
.
) (R
.I#6
) (R2
<<u
_ E
O$l
V
<<u
30#
6 #E2
>I
DF
* Sig
< $
6
1
0.690
0.476
174.479
3.84
0.676
192
0.000
193
*D=:Mar@ ( 0.05)jD,-?(K%"B
) 4 (17
.
| 85
:
:
0$E6 :HO2-1|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+@%D_ O(Tb b?# D^_.#,
!J
< $K(0.05)6
) 4
.(18
| 86
) 4 (18
.
D
!1
b
$21!#
b
Q1!u
b
1!7
b
I6 $uz
!1 b
) (R
.I#6
) (R2
<<u
_ E
O$lV
<<u
DF
30#
6 #E2
* Sig
< $
6
1
0.076
0.006
1.107
3.84
0.045
0.342
0.117
25.498
3.84
0.271
0.406
0.165
37.963
3.84
0.292
0.583
0.339
98.629
3.84
0.549
0.564
0.318
89.664
3.84
0.536
192
0.294
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
*D=:Mar@ ( 0.05)jD,-?(K%"B
) 4 (18
.
(0.076) R
).( 0.05 R2 ) (0.006 ) (0.006
| 87
(0.045)
) .(0.045 F ) (1.107
) ( 0.05 F ) .(3.84
.
0.342) R 0.406 0.583 (0.564
).( 0.05 R2 ) 0.117 0.165 0.339 (0.318
) 0.117 0.165 0.339 (0.318
0.271) 0.292 0.549 (0.536
) 0.271
0
$ > Ib | E$
< 6
)$ 2# Q u 7
!
< $(0.05)6
| 88
0$E6 :HO2-2|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+ @% D _ O (Tb $
O# EC. ?# D ^_.
#,$ <
!JK(0.05)6
) 4
.(19
) 4 (19
.
) (R
.I#6
) (R2
<<u
_ E
O$lV
<<u
$
O# EC.
Q1!u
$
O# EC.
1!7
$
O# EC.
0.035
0.001
0.234
3.84
0.023
6
192
0.629
193
1
0.457
0.209
50.758
3.84
0.410
0.422
0.178
41.509
3.84
0.344
0.530
0.281
75.119
3.84
0.566
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
I6 $uz
!1 $
O#
< $
EC.
$21!#
30#
6 #E2
D
!1
$
O#
DF
* Sig
1
0.544
0.296
EC.
80.542
3.84
0.586
192
0.000
193
*D=:Mar@( 0.05)jD,-?(K%"B
| 89
) 4 (19
.
(0.035) R ).( 0.05 R2 ) (0.001
) (0.001
(0.023)
) .(0.023 F
) (0.234 ) ( 0.05 F
) .(3.84 .
R
) 0.457 0.422 0.530 (0.544 ) 0.05
.( R2
(0.296
0.410) 0.344 0.566
(0.586
) 0.410 0.344 0.566
(0.586 . F ) (50.758
) (41.509 ) (75.119 ) (80.542
| 90
) ( 0.05 F ) (3.84
:
0
$ > Ib | E$
< 6
)$ 2# Q u 7
0$E6 :HO2-3|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+@% D_ O (Tb I?# D^_.#,J
!
< $K(0.05)6
) 4
.(20
) 4 (20
.
R
) (0.116 ).( 0.05 R2 ) (0.014 )(0.014
(0.106)
) .(0.106 F ) (2.641
) ( 0.05 F ) .(3.84
| 91
.
0.538) R 0.537 0.530 (0.583
).( 0.05 R2 ) 0.290 0.289 0.309
0
$ > Ib | E$
< 6
)$ 2# Q u 7
| 92
) 4 (20
.
D
!1
I
$21!#
I
Q1!u
I
1!7
I
I6 $uz
!1 I
) (R
.I#6
) (R2
<<u
_ E
O$lV
<<u
DF
30#
6 #E2
* Sig
< $
6
1
0.116
0.014
2.641
3.84
0.106
0.538
0.290
78.361
3.84
0.414
0.537
0.289
77.952
3.84
0.375
0.556
0.309
85.951
3.84
0.509
0.583
0.340
99.034
3.84
0.538
192
0.067
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
*D=:Mar@( 0.05)jD,-?(K%"B
| 93
0$E6 :HO2-4|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+@% D_ O (Tb
?# D^_.#,
! J
< $K(0.05)6
) 4
.(21
) 4 (21
.
D
!1
$21!#
Q1!u
1!7
I6 $uz
!1
) (R
.I#6
) (R2
<<u
_ E
O$lV
<<u
DF
30#
6 #E2
* Sig
< $
6
1
0.005
0.000
0.004
3.84
0.003
0.472
0.223
55.028
3.84
0.371
0.385
0.148
33.366
3.84
0.275
0.490
0.240
60.726
3.84
0.458
0.481
0.232
57.941
3.84
0.454
192
0.950
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
*D=:Mar@( 0.05)jD,-?(K%"B
| 94
) 4 (21
.
(0.005) R ).( 0.05 R2 ) (0.000
) (0.000
) (0.003
) .(0.003 F )(0.004
) ( 0.05 F ) .(3.84
.
0.472) R 0.385 0.490
(0.481 ).( 0.05 R2 ) 0.223 0.148
| 95
F ) (3.84
:
0
$ > Ib | E$
< 6
)$ 2# Q u 7
!
< $(0.05)6
0$E6 :HO2-5|g"6
)^!Di
!.T
=+@% D_ O (Tb
?# D^_.#,
! J
< $K(0.05)6
) 4
.(22
| 96
) 4 (22
.
D
!1
$21!#
Q1!u
1!7
I6 $uz
!1
) (R
.I#6
) (R2
<<u
_ E
O$lV
<<u
DF
30#
6 #E2
* Sig
< $
6
1
0.228
0.052
10.488
3.84
0.132
0.354
0.126
27.593
3.84
0.276
0.269
0.072
15.006
3.84
0.191
0.531
0.282
75.450
3.84
0.493
0.414
0.171
39.603
3.84
0.387
192
0.001
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
1
192
0.000
193
*D=:Mar@ ( 0.05)jD,-?(K%"B
) 4 (22
.
R
) 0.228 0.354 0.269 0.531 (0.414 ).( 0.05
| 97
#,$ <
!J(0.05)6
@ @
| 98
@ @ba@a
@ @pbna@pbubnna
<
W(1 5)
w
W(2 5)
30
6W(3 5)
3z$ W(4 5)
99 |
) 5 W(1
<
.
: .
| 100
)(3.91
. ) (2006
.
.10
) .(0.05
) (Weldy, 2009
.
.11
(
) .(0.05
) (Davis & Daley, 2008
.
.12
(
) (0.05 ) Khadra & Rawabdeh,
(2006
:
.
| 101
) 5 W(3 30
6
.1
.
.2 .
.3
.
.4
.
.5 .
.6
.7
.
) 5 W(4 3z$
.3
.
| 102
.4
.
.5
.
.6
.
.7
.
.8
.
.9
.
.10
.
| 103
@ @uaa@b
OK0
W6
.
0,K0
W J
104 |
W6
K0 O
.1 " (2001) " :
.
.2 " (2001) "
: .
.3 " (2006)
" .
.4 " (2009)
: " :
.
.5 " (2004)
" ) (44 ).63-22 :(1
.6 " (2007)
: "
) (3 ).491 -466 :(4
.7 " (2006)
"
:.
| 105
.8 .(2008)
.
.9 " (2003) : " :
.
.10 " (2002) "
"
" 8 9 1423 12-10.
.11 " (2001) " :
.
.12 " (2006) "
.
.13 " (2008)
" 48 .475-435 :3
.14 " (2004) :
" 20 4-23 :
.49
.15 " (2004) " :
.
| 106
W J
K0 .
0,
1. Addleson, M, (1998), What is a Learning Organization,
http://pos.gmu.edu/ home/perspective.ns.
2. Alavi, Maryam, and Leidner Dorothy E., (2001), Knowledge
Conceptual
Systems:
Management
Knowledge
and
Management
R.
(2004).
Learning
organization,http//
www.Dist.Maricopa.ed.
6. Borghini, E.C. (2005), ""A Framework for the study of relationships
between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation", The
Journal of Creative Behavior, Vo. 31, No.1: 226-289.
7. Buckley, Finian & Monks, Kathy, (2008), Responding to Managers
Learning Needs in an Edge of- Chaos Environment: Insights from
Ireland Journal of Management Education, Vol. 32, No. 2: 146-163.
8. Carmeli, Abraham & Sheaffer, Zachary, (2008), How Learning
Leadership and Organizational Learning from Failures Enhance Perceived
Organizational Capacity to Adapt to the Task Environment The Journal
of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 44, No. 4: 468-489.
9. Chang, D & Su, K, (2007), Exploring the correspondence between
total quality management and Peter Senges Disciplines of a Learning
Organization: A Taiwan Perspective, Total Quality Management, Vol.
18, No. 7: 807822.
10.Cook, J.A., Staniforth, D. and Stewart, J. (Eds) (1997), The Learning
Organisation in the Public Services, Gower, Hampshire.
108 |
A.
(2000),
Organizational
learning
and
competence
for
Knowledge
Management:
Information
Strategy,
The
110 |
27. Liao, L, (2006), A learning organization perspective on knowledgesharing behavior and firm innovation, Human Systems Management, 25:
227236.
28. Marquardt, B. (1996), Learning to Change: An Information
perspective on Learning Organization, Business Quarterly, Vol. 61, No.
2: 23.
29. Marquardt, M. J. (2002), Building the learning organization:
mastering the five elements for corporate learning, Palo Alto, USA:
Davies-Black Inc.
30.Watkins, Karen E. & Marsick, Victoria J. (Eds.), (May 2003). Making
Learning Count! Diagnosing the Learning Culture in Organizations, Advances in
Developing Human Resources, Vol. 5, No.2. Thousand Oaks, Ca:Sage.
learning:
developmental
theory",
The
Learning
36.Senge, Peter, (1994), "The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the
learning organization", Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
37. Song, J; Song, B, and Thomas J. C., (2009), The dimensions of
learning organization questionnaire (DLOQ): A validation study in a
Korean context, Human Resource Development, Vol. 20, No. 1: 43-64.
38. Stronmgulst, N, & Samoff. J., (2000), Knowledge Management
System: On the Promise and Actual forms of Information Technology.
Journal of Comparative Education, Vol. 30, Issue. 3: 324.
39.Sudharatna, Y and Li, L, (2004), "Learning organization characteristics
contributed to its readiness-to-change: a study of the Thai mobile phone
service industry", Managing Global Transitions, Vol. 2, No. (2): 163
178.
40. Thomas, K., Allen, S. (2006), "The learning organisation: a metaanalysis of themes in literature", The Learning Organization, Vol. 13
No.2, pp.123-139.
41.Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1997), Dimensions of the learning
organization questionnaire Survey, Warwick, RI: Partners for the
Learning Organization.
42.Weldy, T. G, (2009), Learning organization and transfer: strategies for
improving performance, The Learning Organization, Vol. 16, No. 1: 5868.
43. Yang, B. et. Al, (2004), "The Construct of the Learning Organization:
Dimensions:
Management
and
Validation",
112 |
Human
Recourse
@ @ya@b
7l'&O=W6
(J. 6)#?W J
113 |
<_) (1
=&'O 7l
S
<7Lu <V
K
K
K"#K!
$%&'()*+K
,'K'
-./01
*3K
| 114
<_) (2
?#) (J. 6
<^XJ. J
#
?# D^_.#, J
^g.
'&%
#$
(O)
,* #$
.!/
| 115
DgMcDO
<<
<<
< <f<<JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<K<^]<<<K<^j]
"
D?
-N"D
>?^;K%R!a0-:-oABH-P4"J#,_^.D ?#
.
p^qlo^
B B .3!>
PQ , ?^ QS MIr G0! $J@ T[L +Q
^g.
#$
%&'
116 |
|svQ
@ @ @ @
) (1 @ @
@ @
=@ @ 30M<u
@ @
<@ @ 4030M
@ @
<@ @ 5041M
@ @
@ @ f*Q 51
@ @
) (2 {
V
*
1fJ
) (3
$
$E#$7O
$O!
< > 0
* #$ 8
f*Q 16
^_.#, J
| 117
OuO0h
?H
3
Q
6Q
Q
6 gi" Q Q
?CO
?CO
<
D
1
-D
!
T _O
=
e,-n]0 -:- !:De,-n
i
B-3p
D
('^!!JT PR
TS
D
('D%i('-"0=?!QDD
'B
D
TAB,q$@!QZ:-e e,-n
j-D
PQ q:
D, e,$ D
^ e,D ; 4^!+Q
^,:-Le,-n^ ,-
$2#
6
9D
T'(7Z[(0?-? Z
!.DD
X^"DL^ MN
)QDD
UDhPDi
^!+ P.+,
!.DD
!.P.+, (L
Qu
j- 11D
!.(S%%~,T^eP ,D
,D>?,9 12D
DrT l:!L
D 13B
D
!.T=9-,>?e:D,,T
D0q=!: 14TD
('!.T^-
B-3p 15
D
('e"T=9? (D
| 118
OuO0h
?H
3
Q
6Q
Q
6 gi" Q Q
?CO
?CO
<
7
k
9: 16D,D
P:
%PR@U
17D
D
0'I
P.+,^! P
j- 18+,D
"!-T:(D(-!QSZ e
!.D 19D
X^"DL^ MN
+,: 20D
3
9b!L!
e
I6 $uz
q3! 21D
((-^!. P,(+n
-3p 22D
('+(LT=9 P.+,
23
W1 24D
- D=, Lb(eO$D?Oe@%^D P
!o 25B
D
('l.-^+e,D P.+,
| 119
OuO0h
?H
3
Q
6Q
Q
6 gi" Q Q
?CO
?CO
<
?
-3p 26S
D
('@q[>?,+,
AD 27S
D
(?>!
28
29
?' S
D
-7 H@U ? eQ" AB
e
^! +Q
PS
D
,O2-
e~%%f:! ABH-P4^+LD
^7re:D?>>?,
' 30S
D
!
-Q.?q3!,loAB
$#EC.
!.D: 31D
9X@%DTb^,!I^! +
P: 32D,D
D3
9:T=9!
X 33D
(-+,@PK^$D
D: 34D,D
(-^T,3D !:
j- 35+,D
PPQD|=):DO(?O@ Yl(Z
3
D 36D
!Q2ZeQ"'(H!!,e($^!+Q^? (D
:-e([ 37e,-n^~\`e(ABL :!,+o
- 38D
('TKD=?QDD P,-R:-N:-i
!QB 39Z:-e(!e,-n!"
D 40D
!O!,'(!,T=9:-e+P. e,-n
| 120
OuO0h
?H
3
Q
6Q
Q
6 gi" Q Q
?CO
?CO
<
Q
41
42
43
D D
T:D
e^! e,D ( L$ P?,D%i ('
^! .
W1D
!.0 P:- T" '(
-^ T39^! (@ Y(r ('
RPZL3 P
W1D
^!.=D?.@e@%Q
n-l?R^eP^!
Y(r
-~ 44D
=?e,D,QDDM=L@=
S"D .!,
45
9D
(' ,OB ei? + I^ POJ
N@ +LD :!=L
@e^! .
j- 46D
D,
c.3,"PQ c9
D 47D
: P,-Rf=>?,
[ 48D
|:,`-70fP.^
q 49D
PL
-IUS
:!('=PL c9
q 50D
2
D-Qe.-? :-
| 121