Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Z05438L Sample
Z05438L Sample
Z05438L Sample
Metal Powders
Metal powders come in many different shapes
and sizes (Fig. 2). Their shape, size, and size distribution depend on the manner in which they
were produced. Metal powder production is covered in depth in various articles in the Section,
Metal Powder Production in this Volume.
There are three main methods of powder
production:
Fig. 1
5 m
Fig. 2
5 m
Powder Processing
For the production of PM parts in high
volumes, compaction is carried out in rigid
dies. In most instances, the metallic powders
are mixed with a lubricant (e.g., ethylene bisstearamide) to reduce interparticle friction during compaction and to facilitate ejection of
the compacted parts by reducing friction at the
die-wall and core-rod interfaces.
The metal powders may be elemental powders; mixtures of elemental powders; or mixtures of elemental powders with master alloys
or ferroalloys, prealloys, diffusion alloys, or
hybrid alloys. See the article Ferrous Powder
Metallurgy Materials in this Volume for an
in-depth review of the alloying methods used
in ferrous PM. A consequence of the various
alloying methods available is that only the PM
materials made from prealloyed powders are
chemically homogeneous. The other alloying
methods can result in chemically inhomogeneous materials. The hardenability is determined
by the local chemical composition, and the
resulting microstructures are generally quite
complex. Chemical analysis can be a challenge
due to the inhomogeneous nature of the materials. Guidelines for sample preparation for the
a l rCp
(Eq 1)
(Eq 2)
(Eq 3)
where E0 is the Youngs modulus of the porefree material, r is the density of the material,
r0 is the density of the pore-free material, and
the exponent m depends on the pore morphology
and varies between 2.5 and 4.5. Nevertheless,
over the density range of interest for ferrous
PM structural materials, 6.4 to 7.4 g/cm3,
Youngs modulus is essentially a linear function
of density (Fig. 3) (Ref 5).
P=P0 r=r0 m
(Eq 4)
52
7.5
51
7.4
50
7.3
49
7.1
48
7.0
47
6.8
46
6.7
45
6.5
44
6.4
Fig. 3
6.6
6.8
7.0
7.2
Sintered density, g/cm3
7.4
6.4
7.6
Fig. 4
72.5
87.0
101.5
116.0
130.5
7.3
Fig. 5
7.2
Transition pressure
7.1
7.0
6.9
Atomized iron
6.8
6.7
400
500
600
700
800
900
0.75% Zn St
1.0% Zn St
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Examples of warm compacted PM parts. (a) Torque converter hub. Courtesy of Chicago Powder Metal
Products. (b) Transmission output shaft hub. Courtesy of GKN Sinter Metals. (c) Hand tool parts. Courtesy
of PoriteTaiwan Co. Ltd.
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
(a) Typical hot isostatic pressing (HIP) vessel. (b) Schematic of the wire-wound unit. Courtesy of Avure Technologies. Source: Ref 13
Freeform Fabrication
Thermal spraying of nickel-base and cobaltbase alloy powders to form wear-resistant coatings has been practiced for many years. Spray
forming is a consolidation process that captures
a spray of molten metal or alloy droplets on a
moving substrate (Ref 17). Figure 14 illustrates
billet formation in a vertical mode by spray
forming. The process can be used to form billets, strip, and thick-walled tubing.
The term additive manufacturing of metals is
used to describe freeform processes that offer
the possibility to produce complex-shaped PM
parts without the design constraints of traditional manufacturing routes (Ref 18). The process relies on the transfer of a digital file to a
machine that then builds the three-dimensional
component layer by layer from a metal powder
using a laser or an electron beam to fuse the
particles together. Schematic illustrations of
powder-bed and powder-fed systems are shown
in Fig. 15 (Ref 19).
Finishing Operations
While PM is considered a net or near-net
shaping process, many PM parts require finishing
Fig. 11
To preheat
furnace
Press proform
Eject fully
dense part
Hot forge
Fig. 10
Fig. 12
Rapid transfer
Heat; controlled
atmosphere
Particle
injector
(optional)
Atomizer (nitrogen)
Round,
spray-deposited
billet
Spray chamber
Exhaust
Fig. 13
Extruded T15 tool steel. (a) Wrought. (b) PM. Notice the bands of carbides in the wrought tool steel
compared with the uniform dispersion of fine carbides in the PM tool steel. Source: Ref 16
Fig. 14
Sweet spot
Robust process,
able to accept
variation
Ma
Fig. 17
Fig. 15
Schematic illustrations of (a) powder-bed and (b) powder-fed additive manufacturing. Source: Ref 18
Fig. 16
without the tool failing in a catastrophic manner. This is the safe zone for machining,
Fig. 17 (Ref 22).
Ferrous PM parts may be heat treated to
improve their hardness, strength, and wear resistance. Oil quenching and tempering may be used
ch
in
p
ing
roc
es
Safe zone
Noncatastrophic,
consistent tool
performance
Applications of Powder
Metallurgy Parts
The following examples have been selected
to illustrate the wide diversity of the parts made
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
409 Cb
PM flange
409 Cb
PM flange
TIG weld - no filler
Fig. 18
Example of a PM weldment. Source: Ref 27. Reprinted with permission from SAE Technical Paper 930490,
copyright SAE International
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Manifold used in offshore oil and gas production. Metso Powdermet AB, courtesy of MPIF
sheet metal cutting technology, and cuttingedge robotic welding and part manipulation to
produce the end covers. This resulted in an
increase of more than 50 times over the typical
production rate of fully dense, HIPed PM nearnet shapesan unprecedented breakthrough in
productivity. Approximately 2700 end covers
have been delivered to the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). The design
of the part features several complex configurations. For example, both the inner and outer
surface of the broad face are radiused with the
inner surface approximately parallel to the
outer surface. The exterior of the curved surface
has either eight or ten projections, depending on
which version of the part is produced. The
design differs slightly depending on which side
of the dipole magnet it is located. The PM
HIPed part meets the equivalent mechanical
properties of 316LN wrought stainless steel,
including internal toughness and high ductility.
A final example (Fig. 31) is a manifold used
in offshore oil and gas production. Formed by
HIPing from a duplex stainless steel material,
the manifold weighs approximately 10,000 kg
(22,050 lb). Hot isostatic pressing replaced
9.
REFERENCES
1. R.M. German, Powder Metallurgy &
Particulate Materials Processing, Metal
Powder Industries Federation, Princeton,
NJ, 2005, p 8
2. Sample Preparation for the Chemical
Analysis of the Metallic Elements in PM
Materials, MPIF Standard 67, Standard
Test Methods for Metal Powders and Powder Metallurgy Products, Metal Powder
Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 2012
3. H. Danninger et al., Thermal Expansion
and Thermal Conductivity of Sintered
SteelsThe Real Effect of the Porosity,
Advances in Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials2010, Part 10, compiled by
M. Bulger and B. Stebick, Metal Powder
Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 2010,
p 1001
4. P. Beiss and C. Sander, Elastic Properties
of Sintered Iron and Steel, Proceedings of
the 1998 Powder Metallurgy World Congress, Vol 2, European Powder Metallurgy
Association, Shrewsbury, UK, p 552561
5. MPIF Standard 35, Materials Standards for
PM Structural Parts2012 Edition, Metal
Powder Industries Federation, Princeton,
NJ, 2012
6. P. Beiss, Principles of Metal Powder Compaction, European Powder Metallurgy Association Training Course, Aachen, Germany,
Sept 2005, p 109134
7. P. Beiss, Structural Mass Production Parts,
Landolt-Bornstein: Numerical Data and
Functional Relationships in Science and
Technology, Group VIII Advanced Materials and Technologies, Vol 2, Materials,
Sub-volume A, Powder Metallurgy Data,
Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, Chapter 5
8. R.M. German, Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials Processing, Metal Powder
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.