The Tyranny of the Meritocracy argues that universities have strayed from their democratic mission by focusing too much on individual merit in admissions. The author, Lani Guinier, lays out how current practices of ranking and sorting applicants based on private standards of merit actually impede equal opportunity and preparing engaged citizens. She proposes evaluating "democratic merit" based on what graduates contribute through work and civic participation. The book also provides examples of collaborative education models that strengthen communities through group learning and support.
The Tyranny of the Meritocracy argues that universities have strayed from their democratic mission by focusing too much on individual merit in admissions. The author, Lani Guinier, lays out how current practices of ranking and sorting applicants based on private standards of merit actually impede equal opportunity and preparing engaged citizens. She proposes evaluating "democratic merit" based on what graduates contribute through work and civic participation. The book also provides examples of collaborative education models that strengthen communities through group learning and support.
The Tyranny of the Meritocracy argues that universities have strayed from their democratic mission by focusing too much on individual merit in admissions. The author, Lani Guinier, lays out how current practices of ranking and sorting applicants based on private standards of merit actually impede equal opportunity and preparing engaged citizens. She proposes evaluating "democratic merit" based on what graduates contribute through work and civic participation. The book also provides examples of collaborative education models that strengthen communities through group learning and support.
The Tyranny of the Meritocracy argues that universities have strayed from their democratic mission by focusing too much on individual merit in admissions. The author, Lani Guinier, lays out how current practices of ranking and sorting applicants based on private standards of merit actually impede equal opportunity and preparing engaged citizens. She proposes evaluating "democratic merit" based on what graduates contribute through work and civic participation. The book also provides examples of collaborative education models that strengthen communities through group learning and support.
Author: Lani Guinier A fresh and bold argument for revamping our standards of merit and a clear bluepri nt for creating collaborative education models that strengthen our democracy rat her than privileging individual elites Standing on the foundations of Americas promise of equal opportunity, our univers ities purport to serve as engines of social mobility and practitioners of democr acy. But as acclaimed scholar and pioneering civil rights advocate Lani Guinier argues, the merit systems that dictate the admissions practices of these institu tions are functioning to select and privilege elite individuals rather than crea te learning communities geared to advance democratic societies. Having studied a nd taught at schools such as Harvard University, Yale Law School, and the Univer sity of Pennsylvania Law School, Guinier has spent years examining the experienc es of ethnic minorities and of women at the nations top institutions of higher ed ucation, and here she lays bare the practices that impede the stated missions of these schools. Goaded on by a contemporary culture that establishes value through ranking and s orting, universities assess applicants using the vocabulary of private, highly i ndividualized merit. As a result of private merit standards and ever-increasing tuitions, our colleges and universities increasingly are failing in their missio n to provide educational opportunity and to prepare students for productive and engaged citizenship. To reclaim higher education as a cornerstone of democracy, Guinier argues that i nstitutions of higher learning must focus on admitting and educating a class of students who will be critical thinkers, active citizens, and publicly spirited l eaders. Guinier presents a plan for considering democratic merit, a system that me asures the success of higher education not by the personal qualities of the stud ents who enter but by the work and service performed by the graduates who leave. Guinier goes on to offer vivid examples of communities that have developed effec tive learning strategies based not on an individuals merit but on the collaborative strength of a group, learning and working together, supporting members, and evo lving into powerful collectives. Examples are taken from across the country and include a wide range of approaches, each innovative and effective. Guinier argue s for reformation, not only of the very premises of admissions practices but of the shape of higher education itself.