Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tribology International: M. Amarnath, I.R. Praveen Krishna
Tribology International: M. Amarnath, I.R. Praveen Krishna
Tribology International: M. Amarnath, I.R. Praveen Krishna
Tribology International
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/triboint
Detection and diagnosis of surface wear failure in a spur geared system using
EEMD based vibration signal analysis
M. Amarnath a,n, I.R. Praveen Krishna b
a
b
Department of Mechanical Engineering, PDPM-Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing, Jabalpur, Jabalpur 482001, India
Machine Design Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 11 February 2012
Received in revised form
23 December 2012
Accepted 3 January 2013
Available online 23 January 2013
Gears are used for transmission of power, motion or both. Under increased power and higher speeds,
tribological failures such as scufng, pitting, mild wear and tooth breakage are of major concern.
This paper presents the results of experimental investigations carried out to assess wear in spur gears of
a back-to-back gear box under accelerated test conditions. The studies considered the estimation of
specic lubricant lm thickness and its effects on the fault growth on gear teeth surface. Ensemble
empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) technique is used to extract the fault related features from the
vibration signals acquired from the gearbox. The results highlight the advantage of EEMD technique for
effective assessment of wear in spur gears.
& 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Spur gears
Lubricant lm thickness
Empirical mode decomposition
Kurtosis values
1. Introduction
The aim of using gears is mainly to transmit power or rotary
motion between shafts and to maintain the intended angular
velocity ratio, together with smooth motion transfer at high
efciency. When faults occur on one or more gear teeth, the
performance of the gear train deteriorates and the efciency
decreases. When gears operate at their maximum load, very high
contact pressure occurs at their mesh interface. This may lead to
partial breakdown of the lubricant lm at the mesh surface, thus
resulting in two commonly encountered regimes, the elastohydrodynamic and boundary lubrication conditions. Further, gear
failures like wear, scufng, micropitting and pitting are inuenced
by the lubricant lm thickness, viscosity, etc. Methods to predict
gear failure are often related to lm thickness and specic lm
thickness, which are an indication of contact severity or of
possibility of lubricant breakdown. In these methods, lubricant
properties play an important role, since they have a strong
inuence on lm thickness. Literature strongly supports the
dependency of distributed faults in gear transmission systems
on lm thickness, specic lm thickness, stiffness reduction and
subsequent increase in vibration parameters [14].
Moore [5] developed a procedure for calculating lm thickness
and various examples were considered to demonstrate estimation
Nomenclature
Zo
u
E0
E1, E2
s1, s2
r
d0,1, d0,2
absolute viscosity
peripheral velocity
combined Youngs modulusE0 2E1 E2 =E2 1s21
E1 1s22
modulus of elasticity for gear and pinion respectively
Poissons ratio for gear and pinion materials
effective radius of curvature of the two surfaces
1=r 2=Sinb1=d0,1 1=d0,2
diameters of gear and pinion respectively
tooth stiffness by considering bending, shear and rim deformations on a spur gear tooth theoretically. Measurements were
made to validate the analytical ndings. Statistical parameters
such as rms, peak-to-peak and kurtosis values of time domain
acceleration signals were computed. Kurtosis values showed
irregular trend with increase in wear severity under accelerated
test conditions. Experiments were conducted by Amarnath et al.
[11] to asses surface wear propagation in spur gears. The authors
used stiffness modeling, vibration measurement and lubricant
lm thickness estimation for wear severity analysis. Specic
lubricant lm thickness l was found to decrease during prolonged period of operating hours (Fig. 1) this decrease in lubricant
lm thickness was correlated to decrease in stiffness and wear
mechanism observed on the teeth surface.
Loutridis [12] studied the effectiveness of empirical mode
decomposition (EMD) method in spur gear fault diagnosis.
The defect analysis was done comparing the energies of intrinsic
mode functions (IMF), which exhibits high sensitivity to gear
damage. Statistical moments are the descriptors of shape of the
amplitude distribution of vibration data.
The fourth normalized statistical moment, kurtosis, is the
major diagnostic index and kurtosis value has been widely used
for detection of rolling element bearing damage. The main short
coming of this method is its higher susceptibility to spurious
effect of noise and high frequency content in measured vibration
signals. Based on the fact that, in some cases, the adverse effect of
spurious vibrations on the values of kurtosis is more than the
benet gained from the higher sensitivity of kurtosis to incipient
faults in machine elements of rotating machinery. EMD based
kurtosis values are the alternative statistical parameters to overcome the aforementioned drawbacks [13,14].
Parey et al. [15] carried out both simulation and experimental
work to validate the effectiveness of EMD technique in determining the gear fault severity. Statistical parameters such as crest
factor and kurtosis of EMD signal were used to enhance the fault
w
F
FU
db
M
b
l
R
Ra
225
mesh angle
normal tooth force per unit width F=b
normal tooth force F F U =cos b
peripheral force2M=db
pitch circle diameter
torque
tooth width
specic lm thickness
combined surface roughness
root mean square surface roughness
2. Experimental setup
The experimental setup in back to back arrangement used for
this study is shown in Fig. 2. The aim of the experiment was to
initiate and propagate wear under accelerated test conditions.
The arrangement consists of two parallel steel shafts and four
gears (two pinions with 25 teeth and the other two gears with 50
teeth) and a pair of pinions and gears has been assembled on
either side of the shafts. The gear sets are made of En 34 steel
(without any heat treatment). The gears with 25 and 50 teeth had
226
Electric motor
Rigid coupling
25 teeth
50 teeth
Torque shaft
Torque locking nut
Torque adjustment
coupling
Table 1
Dimensions, specications and test conditions of the gears.
Pinion
Center distance (mm)
Pitch diameter (mm)
Module (mm)
Number of teeth
Face width (mm)
Pressure angle (degree)
BHN
Gear
150
100
4
25
25
201
130
200
50
2 105
0.3
En 19, 0.22 % Carbon
0.8 105
Test conditions
Pinion speed (rpm)
Static load (N)
Lever arm L (mm)
Torque on gear wheel shaft
2100 rpm
0690 N
600
0413 Nm
n
X
ci t r n t
i1
2
iv. Ensemble means of the corresponding IMFs of the decomposed signals are calculated by
c i t
M
1 X
cm t
Mm1 i
Recently, this method has been used in the condition monitoring of rotating machinery [17,18]. In the view of enhancing the
diagnostic information from vibration signals, the experimental
work presented in this paper considers ensemble empirical mode
decomposition of vibration signals in conjunction with specic
lm thickness analysis. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition
method is used to extract kurtosis value which is an important
indicator to detect faults in rotating machines. The results
obtained from ensemble empirical mode decomposition and
specic lm thickness analyses are compared and correlated with
severity of fault propagation on gear teeth to obtain reliable
diagnostic information.
150
Operating
time
(c1)
IMF1
(c2)
IMF2
(c3)
IMF3
(c4)
IMF4
(c5)
IMF5
(c6)
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
3.5207
4.1425
4.3621
5.9559
5.4854
3.2473
3.6351
4.104
4.2741
4.6834
7.1087
3.506
3.0347
4.1343
5.014
5.3553
3.455
2.562
2.9352
4.841
6.3563
3.6045
3.0288
3.0953
5.3456
9.0286
4.5559
5.9643
5.3175
4.982
150
Kurtosis = 2.1
100
kurtosis = 3.0
100
50
50
m/s2
m/s2
227
-50
-50
-100
-100
-150
0
1000
2000
3000
-150
4000
1000
2000
3000
Time (O.25 s)
Time (0.25 s)
Healthy pinion
108 hours
4000
150
150
Kurtosis = 4.2
Kurtosis = 3.4
100
100
50
m/s2
m/s2
50
0
-50
-50
-100
-100
-150
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
-150
0
1000
2000
Time (0.25 s)
Time (0.25 s)
0 hour
108 hours
3000
4000
228
Table 3
Kurtosis values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1IMF6) obtained from Empirical
mode decomposition (EMD) for accelerated test 2.
Operating
time
(c1)
IMF1
(c2)
IMF2
(c3)
IMF3
(c4)
IMF4
(c5)
IMF5
(c6)
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
6.424
5.1318
7.4681
6.9143
6.6163
5.1764
5.6981
6.0349
6.2933
6.513
4.1254
2.9176
5.013
4.1343
6.1864
2.847
4.2342
5.5491
2.9352
5.5129
6.3412
9.0679
6.6.12
3.0953
16.504
9.388
8.941
6.976
5.3175
5.9518
Kurtosis Values
4
3
2
1
EEMD
50% noise
EEMD
40% noise
EEMD
30% noise
EEMD
20% noise
EMD
method
signal
Vibration
EEMD
10% noise
Plot
Plot
Fig. 5. Kurtosis values of vibration signal calculated using EMD and EEMD
methods.
Plot
that, rst two IMFs show overall increase in trend, because these
IMFs contain higher harmonics of gear mesh frequencies. Second
intrinsic mode function c2 of EEMD shows a gradual increase in
trend. Hence second intrinsic mode function c2 has been considered for detection and diagnosis of propagating wear on gear
teeth. Further, kurtosis values of vibration signals and EMD based
kurtosis values are also considered for comparison. Figs. 9 and 10
show comparisons and correlations of these results along with
the specic lubricant lm thickness l. Decrease in specic
lubricant lm thickness is closely associated with teeth surface
wear severity and increase in wear on teeth surface triggers
increase in vibration levels. The specic lm thickness values
have been taken from our previous work [11]. In Fig. 9, for
accelerated test 1, lmax and lmin values which are plotted on
the left, decrease with respect to time, this decrease in specic
lm thickness is due to the increase in temperature and consequent changes in viscosity, kurtosis values of raw vibration
signals, kurtosis values extracted from second IMFs of EMD and
EEMD are plotted in the same gure against the scale on left.
From the gures it can be seen that kurtosis value of raw
vibration signal decreases at 27 h of operation during accelerated
test 1 and decrease in kurtosis value is also observed at 54 h of
accelerated test 2, hence kurtosis values fail to show a reliable
diagnostic information on gear teeth surface wear, where as
kurtosis values obtained from the second IMF (c2) of EMD method
increases from 3.3 to 4.6 for healthy and worn conditions of gear
over a period of 108 h at a load of 360 Nm. Further, during second
accelerated test condition (413 Nm, 108 h) kurtosis values
100
50
50
c1
(m/s2)
100
c1
(m/s )
-50
-100
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
50
50
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
50
50
c3
100
4000
1000
2000
3000
4000
1000
2000
3000
4000
1000
2000
3000
4000
1000
2000
3000
4000
1000
2000
3000
4000
-100
-100
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
50
50
2
(m/s )
100
c4
c4
3000
-50
-50
(m/s )
2000
-100
0
(m/s2)
c3
(m/s2)
-100
-100
0
-50
-50
-100
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
50
50
2
(m/s )
100
c5
c5
1000
-50
-50
(m/s )
c2
c2
(m/s )
100
(m/s )
-100
0
-50
-50
-100
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
100
50
50
c6
0
-50
-100
(m/s2)
c6
0
-50
-100
(m/s2)
229
0
-50
1000
2000
Time (0.125 S)
3000
4000
-100
Time (0.125 S)
Fig. 7. IMFs of (c1c6) vibration signalAccelerated test 1: (a)(f) IMFs of Healthy pinion and (g)(l) IMFs of worn pinion after 108 h.
100
50
50
c1
100
(m / s )
c1
(m / s )
230
-50
-50
-100
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
50
50
c2
100
(m / s )
c2
(m / s )
-100
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
50
50
c3
100
1000
2000
3000
4000
50
c4
50
(m / s )
c4
(m / s )
-100
0
100
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
50
50
c5
(m / s )
c5
(m / s )
-100
0
-50
1000
2000
3000
4000
1000
2000
1000
2000
3000
4000
1000
2000
3000
4000
1000
2000
3000
4000
3000
4000
-50
1000
2000
3000
-100
4000
100
50
50
c6
100
-50
(m / s )
c6
100
-100
4000
-50
-50
-100
3000
100
-100
2000
-50
-50
-100
1000
-100
0
(m / s )
c3
(m / s )
-100
-50
-50
(m / s )
-50
1000
2000
Time (0.25 s)
3000
4000
-100
Time (0.25 s)
Fig. 8. IMFs of (c1c6) vibration signalAccelerates test 2: (a)(f) IMFs after 0 h and (k)(l) IMFs of worn pinion after 108 h.
(c1)
IMF1
(c2)
IMF2
(c3)
IMF3
(c4)
IMF4
(c5)
IMF5
(c6) IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
4.6674
5.2492
4.7961
5.1426
4.9103
3.9545
4.0763
4.4495
5.1601
5.4984
6.1612
4.4323
2.6012
4.5061
5.180
4.5811
3.1871
2.4743
7.455
3.816
3.2562
3.6174
3.9184
9.6044
5.3711
11.746
4.0107
20.665
5.5559
7.0284
Table 5
Kurtosis values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1IMF6) obtained from Ensemble
Empirical mode decomposition ( EEMD) for accelerated test 2.
Operating
time
(c1)
IMF1
(c2)
IMF2
(c3)
IMF3
(c4)
IMF4
(c5)
IMF5
(c6)
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
5.407
5.1674
5.4648
5.9439
6.7181
6.0623
6.4098
6.552
6.7029
7.9939
4.5407
6.2857
3.1264
5.9261
8.2956
2.9445
8.989
4.2369
2.6076
4.1632
3.0812
9.59974
5.4398
2.9337
7.842
6.8258
7.9349
15.558
9.4038
8.7151
231
Fig. 9. Specic lm thickness. Kurtosis values of second IMFs of EMD and EEMD with respect to time.
232
Fig. 10. Specic lm thickness. Kurtosis values of second IMFs of EMD and EEMD with respect to time.
Torque -360 Nm
Healthy gear
Increase in pit
size
(after 36 hours)
Macro pitting
(atfer 72 hours)
Torque -413 Nm
Progressive pitting on
Tooth (after 144 hours)
Table A1
Statistical parameters of raw vibration signalsaccelerated test 1.
Table A2
Statistical parameters of raw vibration signalsaccelerated test 2.
Operating time
Krurtosis
Sk
CF
rms
IF
Operating time
Krurtosis
Sk
CF
rms
IF
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
2.1832
1.649
2.863
2.831
3.051
0.0148
0.0338
0.6594
0.0083
0.0118
3.8378
4.0839
4.881
5.214
5.460
5.3320
7.1113
8.3059
10.130
10.827
4.897
5.297
6.109
6.447
7.025
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
3.432
3.609
2.863
3.616
4.173
0.0431
0.0110
0.0036
0.0092
0.0712
5.627
6.005
6.518
6.910
8.332
11.535
11.971
13.049
15.018
15.879
8.101
8.417
9.0134
10.385
12.111
Table A3
Crest factor values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1IMF6) obtained from
Empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) for accelerated test 1.
Operating time
IMF1
IMF2
IMF3
IMF4
IMF5
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
5.4014
4.7347
3.1505
3.7014
6.008
4.5646
5.1498
4.2593
4.5268
6.986
7.2741
5.1802
3.3108
3.8368
8.0934
4.393
4.0268
3.0625
5.3914
8.083
10.914
4.0082
8.6864
5.3461
3.074
4.3482
5.3293
14.042
6.6802
9.117
233
Specic lubricant lm thickness, EMD and EEMD based vibration signal analysis improve the diagnostic capability of a gear
wear monitoring system thereby minimizing possibilities of
unexpected shut downs or interruptions in the operations.
Table A4
Crest factor values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1IMF6) obtained from
Empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) for accelerated test 2.
Appendix A
Operating time
IMF1
IMF2
IMF3
IMF4
IMF5
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
7.3477
4.9959
3.4739
5.1221
8.4491
6.9964
4.7309
4.1194
4.9616
5.0619
9.4767
5.2971
3.4858
4.7792
8.5217
3.7877
3.8669
4.2619
4.4927
6.0175
5.0765
6.5209
5.6955
9.8614
8.232
10.877
7.7792
12.861
14.784
11.789
IMF2
IMF3
IMF4
IMF5
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
0.00268
0.00418
0.00640
0.01287
0.0193
0.00480
0.00316
0.00425
0.00985
0.00823
0.00428
0.00347
0.00498
0.00855
0.002118
0.0038
0.00230
0.00572
0.00603
0.008213
0.00084
0.00122
0.00772
0.00309
0.00109
0.00416
0.00938
0.00596
0.01957
0.02910
A1
Table A9
RMS values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1IMF6) obtained from Empirical
mode decomposition ( EEMD) for accelerated test 1.
Table A5
Impulse factor values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1 IMF6) obtained from
Empirical mode decomposition ( EEMD) for accelerated test 1.
Operating time IMF1
Table A6
Impulse factor values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1 IMF6) obtained from
Empirical mode decomposition ( EEMD) for accelerated test 2.
Operating time
IMF1
IMF2
IMF3
IMF4
IMF5
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
3.1537
8.1227
7.7553
21.659
18.145
2.5712
3.3324
5.1595
7.6470
8.6219
3.1472
2.5049
7.2591
10.526
10.114
4.6312
3.5316
6.6724
6.5016
4.932
2.2374
2.3591
2.7007
4.6255
6.044
1.5179
0.9435
2.2526
1.8994
5.107
Table A10
RMS values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1IMF6) obtained from Empirical
mode decomposition ( EEMD) for accelerated test 2.
Operating time
IMF1
IMF2
IMF3
IMF4
IMF5
IMF6
Operating time
IMF1
IMF2
IMF3
IMF4
IMF5
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
0.03375
0.01413
0.01480
0.011824
0.0803
0.03876
0.00794
0.01131
0.01027
0.04975
0.00479
0.00775
0.00816
0.01517
0.07765
0.00497
0.00977
0.00645
0.01181
0.03234
0.00532
0.00403
0.00424
0.00871
0.00679
0.00898
0.00365
0.00559
0.00740
0.00134
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
17.659
11.562
13.459
9.4555
11.4555
10.1161
11.076
12.05
12.482
14.102
8.9532
5.9959
9.5925
13.004
14.659
8.9583
10.352
6.2084
10.77
9.871
2.6864
2.5359
3.0493
3.6216
7.864
4.982
1.9264
1.7807
2.0525
4.5761
Table A7
Skewness values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1IMF6) obtained from Empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) for accelerated test 1.
Operating time
IMF1
IMF2
IMF3
IMF4
IMF5
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
0.00703
0.02572
0.00267
0.03445
0.02341
0.00358
0.00901
0.05372
0.01914
0.02210
0.12661
0.00351
0.01224
0.03371
0.01993
0.01939
0.00197
0.00248
0.00909
0.002901
0.14689
0.02036
0.17803
0.052948
0.0310
0.21985
0.01055
0.54519
0.03676
0.02290
Table A8
Skewness values of Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF1IMF6) obtained from Empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) for accelerated test 2.
Operating time
IMF1
IMF2
IMF3
IMF4
IMF5
IMF6
0h
27 h
54 h
81 h
108 h
0.08538
0.0.04490
0.01825
0.00011
0.03804
0.09924
0.02667
0.02214
0.00831
0.04427
0.02324
0.06681
0.04136
0.00083
0.01834
0.00937
0.00689
0.02988
0.01758
0.00335
0.01314
0.02631
0.06038
0.01490
0.11665
0.02455
0.02187
0.46761
0.02455
0.88647
234
hmin
R
A2
[10] Yesilyurt I. Gearbox fault detection and severity assessment using vibration
analysis. PhD thesis. UK: University of Manchester; 1997.
[11] Amarnath M, Sujatha C, Swarnamani S. Experimental studies on the effects of
reduction in gear tooth stiffness and lubricant lm thickness in a spur geared
system. Tribology International 2009;42:34052.
[12] Loutridis SJ. Damage detection in gear system using empirical mode decomposition. Engineering Structures 2004;29:1883941.
[13] Oack H, Laprao KA. HMM based fault detection and diagnosis scheme for
roller element bearing. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 2005;127(4):
299306.
[14] Tandon N, Ramakrishna KM, Ydava GS. Condition monitoring of electric
motor ball bearing for the detection of grease contamination. Tribology
International 2007;40:2936.
[15] Parey M, Basaoui EI, Guillet F, Tandon N. Dynamic modeling of spur gear pair
and application of empirical mode decomposition-based statistical analysis
for early detection of localized tooth defect. Journal of Sound and Vibration
2006:54761.
[16] Parey A, Tandon N. Impact velocity modeling and signal processing of spur
gear vibration for estimation of defect size. Mechanical Systems and Signal
Processing 2007;21:23443.
[17] Lei Y, He Z, Zi Y. Application of the EEMD method to rotor fault diagnosis of
rotating machinery. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2009;23:
132738.
[18] Zvokelj M, Zupan S, Prebil I. Multivariate and multiscale monitoring of largesize low-speed bearings using Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition
method combined with Principal Component Analysis. Mechanical Systems
and Signal Processing 2010;24:104967.
[19] Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR. The Empirical mode decomposition and the
Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 1998;454:90395.
[20] Wu ZH, Huang NE. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise assisted
data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis 2009;1:141.
[21] Fernandes PJL, Mc Duling C. Surface contact fatigue failures in gears.
Engineering Failure Analysis 1997;4(2):99107.
[22] Fernandes PJL. Tooth bending failures in gears. Engineering Failure Analysis
1996;3(3):21925.
[23] Jha. K, Diwakar V. Metallurgical analysis of failed gears. Engineering Failure
Analysis 2002;9:35965.
[24] Flodin A. Wear of spur and helical gears. PhD thesis. Stockholm, Sweden:
Royal Institute of Technology; 2000.