Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Simple Macro Economic Model of Nepal
A Simple Macro Economic Model of Nepal
A SIMPLE
MACROECONOMIC
AFGHANISTAN’S OPIUM
MODEL
DRUG FOR NEPAL
ECONOMY
Public Disclosure Authorized
Stephane
Christopher WardGuimbert andByrd
and William
Sailesh
December 2004Tiwari
June 2007
Report No. SASPR-5
Report No. SASPR-11
Public Disclosure Authorized
A A
WORLD
WORLD
BANK
BANK
DOCUMENT
DOCUMENT
The findings,
The findings,
interpretations,
interpretations,
and conclusions
and conclusions
expressed AthisWORLD
expressed
in inpaper
this paper areBANK
are entirely
entirely ofDOCUMENT
those those
theofauthor(s)
the author(s)
and should
and should
not benot
attributed
be attributed
in anyinmanner
any manner
to theto the
World Bank,
The findings, World
to Bank,
its affiliated
interpretations, to and
its affiliated
organizations,
organizations,
conclusions or to members
expressed orintothis
members
ofpaper
its Board
of its
are of Board
Executive
entirely of Executive
those DirectorsDirectors
or the countries
of the author(s) or should
and the countries
they
notrepresent.
be they represent.
attributed in any manner to the
World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent.
About the SASPR Working Paper
The purpose of the SASPR Working Paper kxies is to provide a quick outlet for sharing
more broadly xesearchJanalpsis ofissues dated to development in South Asia. Although the
primaq source of such research analysis is SASPR staff, o&er contributors are most
welcome to use this outlet for rapid publication of thek research that is relevant to South
Asia's developmeat T b e papers rare informal in nature aad basically represent views/andysis
of the concerned author(s1. All papers submitted for publication ate sent for an outside
review to assme quality. 1 provide only a very hght editorial touch. For enquiries about
submission of papers for publication in the series or for copies of published papers, please
coatact Naomi Dass (telephone number 202458-0335).
Sadiq A b e d
Sector Director
South Asia Poverty Reduction and Economic Management
World Baak, Washington D.C.
This papa was prepad as a background paper for the ongoing m a m monitwing work on
Nepal. It is a simple CGE model with basic disb'butional analysis, based on the '123 PRSP'
mdel. It was presented in Nepal in December 2006 and had good fedback. We thank Abhishek
Basnyat, Shanta IDevarajan and the participants of the December 2006 Nepal seminar for their
insights and comments, Emrs are our soIe responsibility.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.....................
...................................................................................... 1
2. The Model .................................................................................................................3
2.1. Overall Structure ..............................................................................................
3
2.2. M m m n o m i c Framework ............................................................................... 4
2.3. 1-2-3 Model ......................................................................................................
5
2.4. Lung-Term Growth Projections .......................................................................... 5
2.5. Short-Temr VARs .............................................................................................. 8
2.6. DistributionalImpact ...................... . . . . ...................................................... 9
5. References..............................................................................................................
16
6. Annexes............ .
.... .
...................................................................
17
A Simple Macroeconomic Model for Nepal
1. Introduction
South Asian economies have grown remarkably jn the past two decades. This has even
raised expectahns that the coming d e d e could truly make a dent on povertp (Devarajan
and Nab; 200q. T h e giowth experience in Nepal - which was mith Sri La& one of the
earliest and quickest liberaher in the region -was in the 1980s and 1990s as encouraging as
in neighboring countries - but these h~$Ievels could not be sustained in the 2000s, wme
growth in the other South Asian economies (notably in India, Figure 1) was fuaher
accelerating.
-
Figum 3: GDP per capita Grwvth. India and Nepal
Note: IOycm ayt~geof G D P p copitta growth (in 2000 US$).S u m : World DrYckpmmt Inliimtors (7006).
At the same time, the incidence of poverty ia Nepal declined from 42 percent in 1995/96 to
31 percent 2003/04 (World Bank, 2006). This strong performance can p a d y be ahbuted
to economic growth, wen though the investment climate gradually deteriorated with the
intensification of the conflict. Another key factor driving the reduction in poverty incidence
has been the rapid increase in remittances to more than 12 percent of GDP:an increasing
numbers of Nepnlis are going abroad to work particularly as low wage workers i n India,
Middle East countries, Malaysia, Korea and others. Other factors dnving the significant
reduction in poverty are an increase in agricultural real wages, increased utbanization and
reducuon in dependenq ratios.
Questions about the sustainability of this trend are however numerous. Is the growth
deceleration of the eady 2000s leadvlg to an increase in poveq? Can hscal poky help
acctIerate the reduction in poverty? Other questions are raised about NepaI" external
position, the role of r e m i ~ c e and
s the fluctuations of the red exchange rate. Fox instance,
are the pressures on t h e exchange rate (with some real appreciation in recent yeats) having
further distributional impact? Are the increasing inflows of remittances (possibly coupled
a with increashg external assistance in the future) having an impact an the exchange rate
CtDutch disease", by which inflows of foreign cuncncy lad to a real appre.dpti;ri of the
nationd m e ncy, which has a negative impact on exports)? These quesuons mo~vatethis
paper and the development of a framework linking the macroeconolnic poky environment
r
Firs&theit usefulness has generally failed to m s c e n d the immediate purpose or time for
which they were initially built, mainly a reflection of their complexity. For example, the
macro-model built by the Energy Commission Sector to forecast energy demand in 1987
was too parochial in its scope and dthough the multi-sector model developed by K h a d
Thapa and Elbers in 1987 had economy-wide coverage, its utility did not outlast the Seventh
Plan. S&yI a fairly comprehensive input-output matrix covering 39 sectors was
developed by the Development Study Consultants in 1390, but the matrix has not been
updated since then. Another notable work is the computable general equilibrium modd that
was developed under the auspices of the Intemationd Development Research Center's
(IDRC) Micro Aspects of Macro Adjustment Policies (MIMAP) to analyze the poverty
impact of trade liberaliza~onin Nepal in 2001. While this is perhaps the ody work that
models and combines the general cquilibriwn effects of macroeconomic policies with
. &striSutional effects, its coverage is h t e d to trade policies and it does not lend itself
conveniently to generalizations over a broader set of macro policies.
Second, their complexity has also often limited their influence in policy dialogue,
Macroeconomic shocks and policies have indeed complicated effects on growth and income
distribution as h e y get transmitted through the economy. Policymakers in Nepal feel that
there is a gIarifig absence of a rigorous framework to analyze the povesty and dis~butional
impact of macroeconomic policies in Nepal and the proposed mcrmconomic model is
intended to be a con&bution towards hUtng this void.
Third, complex models also require a detailed data input. Even i5 such data can be made
avadablt, the intensity of the effort required and the difficulty to update frequently this input
reduce considerably the life expectancy of these complex models.
For that purpose, we use a model proposed by Devarajan and Go (2003) for Zambia aad a
few other PRSP countries. Drawing lessons horn past endeavors to hstitutioaalize such
models into the government's policymaking machinery, the proposed model should be
simple, its data requirements not overly demanding, and its mechanics relatively easy to
understand and use. Under h e s t criteria, the 123-PRSP model seems appropriate for the .
kind of poticy questions that this papex seeks to tackle. Here, w e also hghhght the potential
usefulness of the mode1 by xeviewb~ga few policy questions related to oil prices, remittances,
real exchange rate levels, public expendimes, and growth.
The paper is structured as folIows. The next section reviews the model, its overall structure
and its five main modules. T h e following section o u h e s a number of hypothetical
scenarios and their growth and distributional implications. A final section conc~udesm
2, The Model
2.1. Overall Structure
The model is based on Devarajan and Go (2003). The objective of this model is to be a
middle ground between existing macroeconomic consistency frameworks and ma-sector
Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models (with disGbutional analysis). It is a middle
ground in the sense that it strikes a balance between complexity and simplidty, sttiving for
an outcome easy to understand for policy rnakm which capture enough of the multiplicity
of channels by which policies hfluence poverty.
Macroeconomic Policies
and External Shocks
G Distribution
The outcome of the model is a set of relative prices, sector-spec& profits and wages that
are consistent with the chbration of the model, The equilibrium is reached by setting the
prices that zlle driving (i) the productive d o c a ~ o nbetween domestic goods and exports and
(3the consumption allocation between domestic goods and imports. Government and
households are subject to a budget c o n s h t . In addition, there is an external balance
constraint (with the current account being equal to an exogeaeous level of foreign savings).
The model assumes that, behind the goods sectors, the labor market is competitive and the
equilibrium wages bring the matket to full employment. Capital is assumed to be fixed and
sector-specific.
In its static version, the model is calibrated with a s d set of macroeconomic indicators (all
fiom the national accounts). In addition, the calibration requires two elasticities, the
ehsticity of ttansformation between the two production sector (domestic goods and exports)
and the elasticity of substitution in t h e utility fuaction between the two goods used in the
country (domestic goods and imports). For Nepal, both are set a t 0.60 (see Devarajan, Go,
Lz,1999).
In out model based on the 123PRSP framework this static model is run for each year of the
simulation (it still remains a static model as there is no intertemporal m a e a t i o n or
constraint). En other words, the model is calibrated for each yeas with the baseline
macroeconomic h e w o r k (Section 2.2), which, in variant a d y s i s , is adjusted by either
long-term g o d projections OX.short-term shock impacts (see next two sub-sections),
As shown in Table 2 and Figure 3, the model - which is estimated an a pand of countries,
not on Nepal only - has a good fit for Nepal in the past, with an underestimation of the
growth acceleration in the &st half of the 1970s and an overestimation of growth since the
mid-1990s. T h e Iatter gap is likely to be related to the poEticd and security issues that Nepd
confronted d h g the recent period: assuming a brighter future for the country h r n that
point of view, the model can be expected to generate realistic projections for the future (a
"peace and stability" growth dividend).
Table 2: Long-Term Growth Projections
1480.84 7-80 t87UT4 157579 188W 188580 1mQd 189589 XXXF2M)4
lrvbal GCP Per Capth (USSJ 856 673 683 777 sDe 93s I OE3 7.lR 1233
IntOal Owrpul Gap 22% 11% 0 1% -2 7% 12% -? 3% 4 1% 1.8% -1 2%
E d u a h o n d a r y EnoRinml 142 142 151 149 21.7 284 304 374 47.0
F~nanclal (kplh -to m i k CmdWGDP 13 20 40 50 85 H7 t45 255 14.3
Trade Openness. Trade VdwnerGOP 504 533 S t W.8 595 $82 Ba3 BB6 713
~ovemment~urdank-.wn~eC ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ V G D P 71 77 83 7.7 83 93 a4 91 9.a
Puale Irifsastructum M m Te- Lhes psr 1WOpeopfe 079 l.t& 14d D62 083 ts5 3!3 748 1307
Govomance (1.26) (1.24) (1 24) (124) (0.93) (0 58) (0 42) (0 44)
Lack d Pncn StablMy lml&tlplRafa 10336 tO5DB 31057 1 ~ ~
11055 ~ 111.13
) 1 1 1 36 TO781 1W48
C y c h l Vchrlty S D M Outpi Cap 2.0% 2.4% 23% 07% 32% 14% 1.1% 08% 17%
Real Exmange Rake 2000-100
Swlernlc Banklw Chm
T ~ r m sU! T Q ~ R
G M h
19d
48% -14%
245 218
-52%
193
00%
170
OW
140
0.20
00%
- 108
0.m -2.W
57 89
04%
per U p b Q W h
Actual 02% 05% 53% 26% 00% 29% 3MC 15% 13%
MWol 07% 0.3% 13% 07% 25% 9.8% 3.2% 2.3%
Moving fornard, a first set of projections assumes no progess in the underlying drivers of
growth (left panel af Figure 4). This leads to a projection of less than 1%of per capita
growth per am=, with fairly small confidence intewals (population growth is around 2-2
M%, hence total r e d economic growth would be around 3%))
Figure 4: LongTefm Projections (Annual real GDP per capita growth)
N o change in drivers of gtowth Cbntinued progress in f i v e r s of grwvth
1
5.
'The contideuce intervals are computed following the method in Kraay and MonoIcroussos (1999) which
assumes that there is no uncertainty associated with the forecasted explanatory variables and the parameter
estimates other than the wansjtional convergence effect. The fornula for the 60% confidence interval is
presented in Ianchovichina and Kacker (2005).
This leads to a se&nd set of projections with growth picking up toward 2% per year and pa
.* capita (right panel of F i e 4). baseline scenario (Section 2.2) is consistent with &is
second set oflong-term growth projections.
First, a change in the real exchange rate4would have a number of implications. Based on
these estimated VARs, a positive shock (appreciation) has a negative impact on GDP g r d
the &st year (a l0Yo appreciation reduces growth by 0.89 percentage points the h t year),
even though the impact is slightly reversed the second year. This reflects a typical ] - m e
reaction, where the trade deficit i n i d I y improves after the appreciation (because of pice
stickiness, ~olumesof imports and exports are initially unaffected, and the only effect is on
prices, the appreciation making imports cheaper and exports more profirable) before
deteriorating (as volumes of imports, which are now cheaper, increase and volumes of
exports, now less competitive, decreases). In tbis case, the net effect of an appreciation is a
deterioration in the current account balance (which assumes that-the bfarshd-lerner holds
- i.e. the sum of the demand elasticities t.a import and export is above I].~
Table 5: Short-Term Growth Elasticities
Year 1 Year 2
Shock on Real Exchange Rate -0.089 0.038
Shock on Govenunent Expcnditues 0.124 -0.019
m
e r n V A R f i r ~ b c j r two+&
( a ) Impube n r p o n ~ e ~ h the r~ (Z) RER is cdmhted ar lhc tmak mgbted
fibon in i o ~irade)
l m q g c ofbihtgzaI RERr mlyith two tradingparinm~,I& and dc Kcfl ofbe WWU Indm
WPI, US CPI and UJ'Jgmqfir hd-mpntc.t, fyoddpn'cc~and the world txchanffcrats rerptmrPtm~4. iVtpnli C P I
To link this simulation with h e 123 model, it is assumed that the red appreciation would be
caused by a terms of tsade shock that would reduce (in real domestic terms) import prices
(with an elasticity assumed to be 0.6)and increase export prices (withan elasticigr assumed
to be O.Z).~
on GDP, with a multiplier effect (10% increase in expenditures translating in 12.4 points of
GDP growth) in the &st pear, part of which is offset in the subsequent two yeas. To link
4
The real exchange rate is defined as the nominal exchange rate (foreign currency per unit of NepaLi w e e )
multiplied by the ratio of prices in Nepal o v e ~prices in other countries. Aa increase indicates an
appreciation of the real exchange rate. The effective exchange rate is based on India and the US (the latter
being used as a pTexy for the rest of the world).
',Thapa (2062) indeed concludes that this conditi~nis met in the case of Nepal.
In both cases, it is assumed that firms do not fully pass through the change in exchange rate, with
-_
importers reducing their margins to remain competitive and exporters increasing their margins. Ideally, the
V A R would directly link GDP to terms of trade: however such link was not directly significant with
Nepal's data.
this with 123 model, it also assumed that such shock increases equally capital ancE r e m e n t
expenditures, and that it also leads to an increase in the heal deficit
Simikr simuEati0~1~
were run for a number of other combinations of policy variables such as
agricultural GDP (subject to exogenous dimaac shocks), government consumption - which
would presumably have a greater impact on short term growth - Indian GDP growth rate
and the growth rate of Indian demand (the last two axe key drives ofthe external demand to
Nepal). However, the impulses generated through the combination of these vatiables were
not strong enough to generate enough vadance ia the p a v q outcomes if they were
transmitted h o u g h t h e system.
- change in profits;
- minus changes in relative prices, weighted by the demand for each commdlity.
To assess changes in utiliv for each decile, tZlis approach requires decomposing wages,
profits in the domestic sector7 profits in the export sector, domestic expenditure fur the
import commodity, and domestic expenditure for the domestic commodity. This data is
summarized in Table 4 below.
In terms of income, profits from the domestic sector, which indudes traditional sectors (and
agriculture), are a bigh proportion of income for the poorest, whle profits from the export
sector is biased toward sicher deciles. Wages are somewhere in the middle, with the highest
proportion toward the 3d decile. With respect to expenditures, the propordm of imported
goods in total consumption increases steady throughout the income distribution, with poor
household having viaudy no access to them.
This pattern has important implications for the model. In parti&, a real appreciation of
the exchange rate will make imported goods cheaper relative to domestic goods, hence
benefit mmaifiIy the less poor; at she same h e , the poor, who get n relatively lugher
proportion oftheir income from prohts in the domestic sector, d be relatively worse off.
' Thl~can bc dtrivcd by looking at househo1d's indirect utility as a h c t i o n of wages, profits, and prices,
differentiating this function, and applying Shephard's Lemma.
1
9
Table 4: Distribution of Incqmt and Expenditures
Share of Income
Profits
Wages (domestic (export
Decites sector) sector)
1 0.33 0.53 0.1 5
2 0.37 0.45 0.1 8
3 0.40 0.44 0.1 5
4 0.36 0.44 0.20
5 0.33 0.45 0-22
6 0.28 0.49 0.23
7 0.30 0.44 0.26
8 0.26 0,45 0.30
9 0.23 0.39 0.37
10 0.21 0.44 0.34
-
Average
-
0.31 0.45 0.24 1 0.05 1
0.95
m: & t ~ on inramc and mpc~dtrmsuse a mqping flht~fjvm the N U S U. The mqpiirg rn- tbc cbntcaiion
auuibbb in the N U S TI t~ th 2 sdm a ~ 3d mmmoditit~wed in thc I23PRSP modd Income: JVqps inmm~k .as it is
fmm the NLTS-II mabh on w a p ( a ~ d~ W W S S tbr WIW cash and in-kind t m n r i g p y in a p ' m h n and om.&
up8"acI~rs, inrlkding fib, piece mtc andpmanmt emplym~. h d - h r n dcfine~as ir inchtd~~ aj%i 20 p e n t of
fum income (dall &cileI$ and a q ' n g shun fmm 10 parent of the /OWCSI qrcinii/e to 50 pmmtfor the bights4 ofentnprirc
income. Rnm'ttancc immc, lvhirh ir terhnicalb a b q f t e r , is d o ixcbdcd in i n m m f i o m c p r f r . I m e fmm byfits in hme~fr'c
dsjinrd as mmkst iJ q ~ r i s a dpf ths rmaa&aI.
Expendim -. Fecndtum on &mcstic-m& inchdcs spmding on mcb items a r
H ad~~cation, hvrchold nnt, ufilSicr, und
lobam. For the n'cbtrt thne dtuh, 70 pmm diha opsnditun onfood i r i r ~ u m dto k on i q o r t J . Tbt on&pmnnnnntnt sum
Hm a@, a ~ ' n m2h1
mimp~eeditem$ Ijcommer dvmbk~.
~ ~ x p m d i t son g tpkcd urns$ &Jcs with &e bmrt &ciIc~
+ding on4 I0 pmcnt d their mpnditun on &rabbi OR iqwted wmmodrtic~rmd the ticbed psding s h as hkb ar 50
pmr.
3. Scenarios
3.1. Static simulations
We first sun a few simple static simulations (using 2004 as base year, cf. Table 5):'
- First, we increase the nominal exchange rate by 20%. Since h is the nurneraire in
the model it implies that all prices and incomes increase by 20% as well, leaving d +
quantities unchanged
In all these simulations, the user needs to define the "closure" of the model. As a bast case, we always
assume that savings are fxed - hence the adjustment is made on invesbnent h some cases, we suggest the
implication of an adjustment on savings (with hvesbnent fixed), for instance through a change in foreign
savings (current account).
.- Table 5: Static Scenarios
1 2 3 3 bl$ 1
20% inmaw in 20% i m in Zm in tOO/bin- in
Reduction in
rwmiml w r l d imporl privak transfers foreip
hpTttaritTs
exchanm rate pritx? fmm l o b $ %
Import
Prices 20.0% 20.W 0.W 0.W 4.5%
V01~me 0.0% -14.7% 6.4% 0.9% 0.9%
Exports
hice3 20.m 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Val# 0.0% 3.3% -4.2% -0.6% E.2%
Domutte G o d s
Price8 20.0% 4.6% 9.1% 1.2% -2.5% '
- Second, we assume a 20% increase in the overall price of impom (e.g. impact of
large increase in internationa1 oil prices). This leads to a 15% decrease in imports as
- assuming no change in foreip savings (hence in the w e n t account) - the country
can afford less imports (the impact would be dampened had we assumed an
adjustment through higher foreign savings). This is offset by a small (3%) increase iD.
expoas to increase Nepal's capacisg to buy imports. To ensure this redocation of
resources to the export sector, the price of domestic goods has to decrease - its
decrease relative to the price of exports means a depredation of the real exchange
rate. This also leads to a decrease in the demand for domestic goods - but it is very
small (less than 1'/or. The income and expenditure of poorer households suffer most
from the shock. Hence both the o v d reduction in income (about 5%) and the
negative distributional impact add up to an increase in poverty.
- Third, we assume a 20% increase in private transfers (e.g. remittances). With the
current account (or foreign savings) h e d , this allows the txade b h n c e to deteriorate,
hence imports can inctease (6%). But it also allows more consumption, hence a
larger supply of domestic goods, which drives an increase in the price of domestic
goods. This drives away resources fiom the export sector (though an decrease in
the relative price of exports), hence leading to a lower volume of exports (4%). This
has a redistributive impact, as all incorne increases but the reduction in exporn
penalizes dchet households. Overall p o v e q is reduced, but only shghtly because of
the impact of the exchange rate appreciation ("Dutch disease")).
- Given the constfilction of t h e model, the impact of an increase in official grants has
broadly speaking the same impact (but the impact is of a lower magnitude since a
L
20% increase in o f f i d grants implies, in absolute t-S, n smaller impact than a
.-
20% incrase in private transfers)?
In this base case, real income increases with economic growth for all deciles (Table 6). T h e
appreciation of the real exchange rate in t h i s base case leads to some distributional shift, with
the income of the richer deciles increasing (more dependent on exports) somewhat less than
the income of poorer deciles (and a smder opposite effect on expenditures, as richer d e d e s
tend to consume more imports which are made reIaheIy cheaper by the real appreckeon).
The effect leads to a small reduction in inequality (contrary to the increase observed between
95/96 and 03/O4]. Illustratively, this could lead to a reduction of poverty incidence from
32% to 24% in 5 years {cf. Figure 5). This would be a reduction of a magnitude similar to
the-previous five years.
9
There is however a different composition in the increase in income, with a higher proportion of
consumption in the case of private transfers and a higher proportion of investment in the case of official
grants, which presumably would have an q a c t over the long run in a dynamic simulation. Although the
= model does not capture this stylized fact, it i s likely that an increase in official grants will have a*lower
import content than an increase in private fransfws.
" D e increase of exports as a result of import iaiff liberahation (i-e. '"import tariffs are a tax on export")
is a standard result o f such model. This largely disappears if the foreign savings can be adjusted: then the
higher demand for imports is fmaneed by more foreign borrowing, with almost no impact on expo*.
Figwe 5: Change in 1ncomt'~isttiitdon
(Illustrative) r
Let us now assume that the new Government builds a b u d g e t with a 15% haease in
emendimes (spread equally over recurrent and capital expenditures). This could fox
instance be viewed as the impact of more s e d t y spending or a d d i t i d development
investment. W e assume that total invesment adjusb to available savings (hence more public
i n v e s m e n t lends to less private investmeng cf. footnote 8 on closure). The impact is as
follows:
- GDP growth accelerates in the short-run (cf. VAR model in Section 2.51, but this is
partly offset by subsequent dedines after the temporary budget increase;
- T h e fiscd deficit blooms the titst year. The assumpdon is that the access to foreign
borrowing remains coastant as a share of GDP. Hence the deterioration of the heal
deficit raises issues of sustalkabiliq;
- Given the large savings rate of the private sector, the increase in GDP leads to an
increase in private savings wkch more than offset the reduction in government
savings. As a resdq even though the current account (i.e. for- savings) is fixed,
investment can increase slightly (less than 1%) despite the lower government savings;
- T h e hrst year, there is a small depreciation of the exchange rate, which benefits the
export sector;
- As a resul~although the budget increase benefits the whole distribution through its
short-term Keynesian effect, richer households benefit more horn the accelerated
growth of the export sector. As a result, the poverty headcount is reduced by an
additional l/z point - i.e. the initial growth impact is somewhat offset by the
subsequent slow-down and the dis&ibutional impact of the exchange rate
depredation.
If all h
s increase goes to very effective expendituxes, we could assume that after this
increase in expenditures (and its short-term demand effect) growth potential i s increased,
leading to a sustained increase in the growth rate. This wodd h h e r reinforce the impact
on poverty.
- By assumption, GDP growth is 2% hzgher werg year ,which reinforces the effect on
p o v e q reduction;
- There is a shght shift from domestic production to exports, which has a
distribuuond impact favoring richer househoIds.
4. Conclusion
T h e simple model discussed in this paper is a good vehicle to hqhlight in a simple way some
of the complex transmission mechanisms of economic policy to poverty. It raises a number
of interesting questions with tentative quantified answers. First, not surpisingly, economic
gowth is a key driver to poverty reduction. From that point of view, the long-term growth
model gives an interesting perspective on the impact of the conflict and political instability
on economic outcomes and the potential prospects for n "peace dividend". Second, through
its implications on economic growth, both its level and composition (distributioaal effect),
the real exchange rate is a key transmission mechanisms and cannot be ignored ia the
andysis of policies. This has important implications for the analysis of increased inflows of
f o r e p currency - be it private remittances or pubIic external assistance.
By developing a simple model, this work is expected not only to enhance t h e capacity to
address selected policy issues, but also to generate a higher demand for such analytical work
to inform, policy choices. The next step with this simple model is therefore to expose it to a
wide range of potential stakeholders to get their views and insights and assess how it can
potentially help informing policy debates.
Devarajan, S., Go,D. (20031, 'Yhe 'r23PRSP Model'", Chapter 13 in Bourguignon and
Per& da Silva, Tookt for Evaluating the Poverty and Disfributional Impact of
Economic Policies,
Devarajan, S., Go, D.,Li, H. (1999), "Quantifying the fiscal effects of trade reform: A
general equilibrium model estimated for 60 countries", mimeo, July 1999.
Kraay, G and G. Monokroussos (19991, "Growth Forecasts Using Time Series ant3
Growth Models'" World Bank P o l i q Research Working Paper, 2224.
Thapa, N.B (2002), "An econometric analysis of the impact of red effective exchange
rate an economic activities in Nepal", Nepal Rastra Bank Economic Review: Occasional
Paper, 14, April.
(11 ~=%m
a)a"=F F i P P )
13) P = C + ZE+
(4) I d = MI*
(5, = W,F?
E:Eq~w~gwd
M; Impat g m d ~ W d p r i a d i n ~ p d
D*:srppluor-rn p~?~uktpriecdexg&gcd
d ] : ~ ~ b r ~ g o o d f?':Td nb
Q? 5upppraf pd t': wrt w w r d e
Q': Demand h rr*posle g o d F sale5'@m-**
P':Dome~priceuIexpwt~ ??drPCltilx r;*ie
P":Danc5kmnbm~.atgwd h=gowrrment-
F':~**ddmstrg~~d f t : f o r ~ % m 5 m b o ~
P: s a k ~ p - ~ o f c v m p o s r t ~ ~ n:6 w g n mmitlxlcpr la mw
C P md w - a - s A- ravings me
P.Pme of- p d X A r m - W k ar4wt
R E*chnge rate G:Aealg~vwnmentM
T: TDI m e B: Baiance d Wade
$1: G1- rarlngs n:h m d *rn- cM?ly
Y: TOMincwne rr: In?pc+rtstbsEuDOn
&&&j
c:AQimgateml!aqJh
S:Aggeg;r* sni?((s
2 Agg-e red Tivehm