Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spes - : Some Experiments On The Flow of Miscible Fluids of Unequal Density Through Porous Media
Spes - : Some Experiments On The Flow of Miscible Fluids of Unequal Density Through Porous Media
, /
.
spes=-
1:
1
,,
I
,
ABSTRACT
Two e fects of a di~ference in density
may be
(
obsetved
is miscible displacement.
As tbe difference
.
is increased
~om zero there is first a change in
mode from rnzdtipie fingers to a single finger. A
further increase results in a more rapid growth of
tbe
single
finger.
Miscible
displacement
with
multiple fingers has been discussed
by Blaekwell,
et al, whereas miscible displacement
with a single
finger has beert discussed
by Craig, et al. In the
present
paper experiments
are described
which
bridge the gap betweeq these extreme cases.
,:
within the Dorous msdiitmi
HORIZONTAL SY$TEM
MULTIPLE FINGERS
BLACKWELL ct al.
sINOLE FINGSR
CRAIO @d.
~~ INTRODUCTION
,.
*Now ssrqiated
Stwfont. Tex.
..
.,
DECEMBEil,
-.
19G9
CO,
OJ
3 MoB:,n &07
8=30
L=I12 CM.
22 e
=s0
k
*%lHEoRY,M~2z
--h
----
I*
16 -
20-S3 US BEADS -@
%0-70
us BEAOS -~
-n
~s
14
12
10
s.,
,.
@iEOTC+ M=6.5
\
.\,~53
\\
--
\
2
1.
01
.1
5!
O--*
32,
I I I 111111 I !
10
.
1111111
100L
33
43
5045
e
,4?
44
e-cl
\
- ----- J
0..
1 1 1111111I I 11!11111 !1
>-~-JmRY*=l
------------
4849 \
Imo
@w
&
OF GRAVITY
FORCES ON
FIG.
2 THE EFFECT
THE PRODUCTION HISTORY AFTER BREAKT~OUGH.
INCREASED
EFFICIENCY
AT HIGH
VALUES OF
F! ./6
IS ACCOMPANIED
BY MULTSPLEFINGE$UNG.
,..
---.
.
.,-%77
.,.
,
.
EXPERIMENTAL
1 PROPERTIES
L=112cm.
fi=lOcm,
(Q/A)
#
.
55
54
56
57*
53
52
51
48
49
,.
?:
54
44
41
45
46
47
27
27
26,9
26.9
L@
,049
.049
.2)07
.007
6,92
.131
.131
6,92
.131
6.97
. 13T
6.88
6.88
.131
.132
6.88
.132
6.88
.131
6,91
102
6.5
6.43 ~~ .079
.052
6.62
6.86
.02
-.002
6.67
v
cc/see
%/9
342
342
342
342
.0034s
.0463
.0485
.0462
58.2
775
5990
m
342
342
342
44* 1
44.1
44* 1
44.1
44,1
~4&}
44!
44,1
44,1
44.1
.00345
.0143
.0434
,0158
i0332
,0405
,04S2
.367
.0443
,0357
,0452
,0443
.0449
!i,5
22.7
69
192
403
.504
540
578
672
688
1380
3340
35800
. .. .. ..
----
W=.412cm
Pvto
Pv to
produce
98%
17,5
9.2
4.18
3,6
6
4*5
4.5
4.5
3.65
3.28
2.8
2,7
2,0s
2..
1.96
2.1
2.1
produce
95%
.
15.6
7.7
3.66
2.8
5
~ 3.75
3.65
3. 9s
3.27
2.96
2,71
2.5
1.9
1.8.
1,~6
1.95
1.95
in Figs.
THEORY
The
dimensionless
groups
which characterize
the flow of miscible fluids in a horizontal
system
may be divided
into geometrical
ratios, and hydrodynamic
ratios.
Among the former may be listed
the ratios of length to height, width to height, and
the initial
and boundary
conditions,
Among the
latter are the mobility ratio, the ratio of the viscous
gradient
to the gravity gradient,
and the ratio of
the viscous force and diffusive
force, The dependent
l.Jr-l- I
.,
A
,412CM.
FEl-
.}
IO,CM.
112OR 2VOCM.
INTERVAL TIMER
I TO 2 MIN.
AP?ROX 6ML
b
II
FIG.
3 SCHEMATIC
DIAGRAM
APPARATUS
TO ANALYZE
OF MODEL
EFFLUENT.
Aik) ..
I!Z2!!I
m
Iizz!!I
m
0
TABLE
{2345,678910
012345678910
PORE VOLUME INJECTED
FIG.
4 VARIATION
IN COMPOSITION
FLUENT
WITH RATIO OF, VISCOUS TO
FORCES R Id .
OF EFGRAVITY
Lo
5
u
2
0.
K
[/
.,
#
ok
o,
!,
...
>
-:?-
FIG. S - COMPARISON
OF EXPERIMENTAL
DATA
WITH THEORY
FOR A SMALL VALUE OF R ,/g,
.
. ... .
.,
.-.
.,,
. .
,.
,-----
,,
.
..
1 ..-..
. ..
-
..
.
.-
..
,
,
..
variable
chosen to illustrate
the behavior
of the
system waa the number of pore volumes required to
produce 9S per cent of the original fluid. Three of
the
independent
variables
were changed
in the
course of the experiments
performed.
Thus we may
describe
the scope of the experiments
by writing
fJ=/(R1.~Af#M)
CC~O.0..
(U
(.:1,2
+#!&)(j)=%g,
~ * 9(2)
RESULTS
Thus the two groups R 1 and (L/H) do not OCCLU
E q. 2 is
independent
y but only as a prodwct.
illustrated
in Fig, 2 and it is clear that only for
/
Rvl$
less than 10 has the density
difference
a
significant
effect.
The influence
of the mobility ratio can also be
illustrated
by considering
a special
case.
The
theory described
by Diet z ~ has a simple interpretation
if the difference
in density
between
the
fluids is large enough to form a single finger, yet
smalk enough to be negligible
compared with the
viscous
forces. In these circumstances
each point
on the interface
has its, own constant
velocity.
. The disdacin~
fluid arrives
at -the outlet
when
l/M por~ vol&es
have been injected;
all of the
displaced
fluid has been produced
when M pore
voIumes have been in jetted;
Between rhese limits
it may easiIy be deduced that the number of pore
volumes
n required to displace
x per cent of the
tyiginal
fluid is related to the mobility ratio M by
1
M-l
+=
2(Mrr) 1/2-l-n
Fig.
5 shows a comparison
experiment
data.
The
theory
outlined
1,
between
by Dietz
Eq,
predicts
o (3)
3 and
that
in
eneral
N s.ISa restricted
Wc:ion fto %
d
of. ow:ver
thla theory
t e case
a single
penetrating
finger of the injected
fluid. This assumption
is invalid when the density
difference
is small ~enough, and multiple fin-gers form, It must
then ,be assumed that R 1 and L/ff are ind~pendent
vsfiiables
and do not occur simply as their product
%/g.
:,
-.
.-
The trs6sition
from a si~gle predominant
finger
to mukiple fingkrs is illus~ated
in Fig. 2 for .L/H
G -10 and for M = 6.5 and 27. The occurrence
of
. . . ..
. . . . . _,,
.,-e
.,,
DECEMBEa,
..
~,
.,
1969
. .
..;
- .-,
.-.
.;
. ...
.,. ,
The experiments
reported here were designed to
cover a wide range of the variabIe RVIg and hence
test
the applicability
of the Dietz th;ory.
The
main restdrs are shown in Fig. 2. For small values
of Rv/g the theory is quite satisfactory
although
the observed efficiency
of displacement
is td ways
somewhat
better
than the prediction.
The large
increase in efficiency
for small density differences
is associated
with the formation of multiple fingc+~s
rather than a single finger, and marks the 1imit of- _
applicability
of the theory. For M = 6.5 the theory
is satisfactory
provided RI is Iess than about 30,
and for M = 27 if RI is less than about 10. MuItipIe
fingering
appears
to be fairly completely
developed
for $?I = 70 if M= 6,5, and for R1 =600
if M = 27. Below these transition
regions N depends
on R vie and M; above the transition
regions N tends
to be a constant,
approximately
2; within the transition regi,ons N depends
on R 1,, L/H and M. lt
will be noted that the transition
is gradual. Thus
from Fig. 4 it may be seen that for I?v/g = 192
the production
history is influenced
by ,secondary
fingers and, from Fig. 2, that the Dietz theory gives
a reasonable
agrekmerx with experiment. The lower
limit for the transition
regions
IS cnosen here to
indicate
the start of a wide divergence
from the
theory rather than the, compl-;e
disappear&ce
of
secondary
fingera.
To test these conclusions,
rfuts have also been
made with L/H = 30. The transition
regions were
i
some~hat
wider but had about the same lower
Iirniis,
As further confirmation,
experimen~s
have
also been_, made with verticaI
c ylin~ers with cross
sectionaI areas up to 200 tinie5 targkr. In aH, case<
folly
developed
:mukiple fingering
occurred
and
98 per cent of the original fluid was displaced
by
less
than two pore volumes
even for viscosity
rat{,os as large as 27.
.. . ,..
.. ... ... . . .. . ... .. ..
/.
-,.
As a practical
example
let us suppose
that
H .20
ft, and M = 27.
Then
Ap = 0.2 gin/cc,
ApgH = 1.75 psi and the gravity gradient
is about
0.09 psi/ft.
If the viscous
gradient
is less than
(0.09)
(10) = 0.9 psi/ft,
the Dietz theory is applicable
and the displacement
depends only on the
pressure drop between wells. If the viscous gradient
exceeds
(0,09) ( 600) = 54 psi/ft
the density difference is entirqly negligible.
If the viscous gradient lies between 0.9 and 54 psi/ft multiple fingering
occur:
but is significantly
affected
by the difference in density,
This
number is about 30 for M = 6.5 aind 10 for
M = 27. Dispersion
of the fluids by the porous
medium appears to affect thr? recoveries
appreciably.
2. Above a certain value of RI the recovery is
independent of M, L!H and RI . This value is about
70 for M = 6.5 and 600 for M= 27.
3. Between
these
upper and lower values
of
R1 recovery is dependent on M, L/H and RI.
$ = porosity
..
v=
..
P
L:
Iength of model
R=
permeability
Ap = density
placing
of mo,del
difference
fluid
of displaced
and
of gravity
g= acceleration
H = height of model
w.
width of model
M=
of displaced
fluid)
n=
iv=
dis~
fluid/
RI = +VIJWP
R ~lg = defined
by Eq.
1-
in jetted
:sr 98 per
cent
of
REFERENCES
L
Cra@
F. F,, Sanderlin, J. L., Moore, D. W. and
Geffen, T, M.: t 1A Laborstqt study Of GrwMy e g
regation
in Frontal
Vol. 210, 27S.
2. Blackwell,
(lFactora
R. J.,
Gravity
Models;
4. Dietz,
Vol.
Drives,
Rayne,
~flwncing
placement)t,
3, Gardner,
CONCLUSIONS
!
.
NOMENCLATURE
the
J.
Trans.,
AIME
R. and ~erry,
Efficiency
(1957)
W. M.:
of Msible
DIs-
G. H, F.; Downie,
J. and Kendall, H. A.:
Segregation
of Miscible
Fluids
in Linear
Sot. Pet, Eng+ Jow, (June, 1962) %
D. N.;
56, 83.
Profi,
Acad.
Science
Amst.
(1953)
***
r..
. .
,..
..
SOCIETY
j,1
..
.
.,
,.
..-.
OF
..
Pt3T110LEll M
... .. .. .
ENGINEERS-
. .
JOURNAL