Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
Tarbiat Modares University, Jalale-E-Aleahmad Highway, Tehran, Iran
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM),40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Nanouid is an alternative promising cooling liquid with superior performance characteristic compared to
conventional cooling liquid for Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). In this paper, new ndings on
ratio of thermal conductivities and electrical conductivities of nanouids in water: ethylene glycol (EG) mixtures
are established. Thermal conductivities and electrical conductivities of base uids which are water: EG mixtures
with concentration ranging from 0 % ethylene glycol up to 100 % ethylene glycol were measured. These base
uids are then dispersed with Al2O3 at 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 % of volume concentration and thermal conductivities
and electrical conductivities are then measured at temperature of 20 C. The result demonstrates that thermal
conductivities reduced as the EG content percentage increases in the water: EG mixture. Thermal conductivities
for 0.5 % volume concentration of Al2O3 is 0.6478 W/m.K and 0.2816 W/m.K for 0 and 100 % EG content in water:
EG mixture. However, at a specic EG percentage, thermal conductivities also increased as a function of volume
concentration. Electrical conductivities measured in 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 % volume concentration of Al2O3 in base uid
also observed to decrease as the EG concentration increased even though the base uids electrical conductivity
behave differently. Thermo-electrical conductivity ratio (TEC) has also been established based on both thermal
and electrical conductivity ndings.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Heat transfer advancement plays a vital role in the eld of thermal
engineering. The improvement of forced heat transfer coefcient for
cooling mediums namely water, oils, propylene glycol and ethylene
glycol have shown signicant importance due to their vast application
in the transfer of thermal energy. Apart from heat transfer coefcient,
various efforts have been taken to improve heat transfer performance
such as increasing heat transfer area and temperature difference that
results in heat ow. However all these efforts have come to a saturated
zone [1]. Miniaturization of heat transfer devices in today's globalization
world has also driven the need for developing new thermal uids with
superior heat transfer performance without sacricing the compactness
of the design. Enhancement in heat transfer performance of new
thermal uids is made possible by dispersing nano-sized particles
with diameter of 1 to 100 nm into the base liquids which results in
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.12.015
0735-1933/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
62
I. Zakaria et al. / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 61 (2015) 6168
Nomenclature
ATC
Ck
C
EDL
FESEM
HEG
EG
k
kr
kEG
m
n
PEMFC
TEC
TEG
Temperature compensation
Thermal conductivity enhancement
Viscosity enhancement
Electrical double layer
eld emission scanning electron microscopy
Hydrogen exfoliated graphene
Ethylene glycol
thermal conductivity, W/m K
thermal conductivity ratio of nanouid to base uid,
(Knf/Kbf)
thermal conductivity of pure ethylene glycol, W/m.K
mass, gram
empirical shape factor
Proton exchange membrane fuel cell
Thermo-electrical conductivity ratio
Thermal exfoliated graphene
Greek symbols
volume concentration, %
density, kg/m3
electrical conductivity
Subscripts
bf
base uid
eff
effective
nf
nanouid
p
particle
r
ratio
Fig. 1. FESEM image of dry Al2O3 nanoparticle at X 250,000 magnication. (a) Nanouid
samples after preparation. (b) Nanouid samples after a month. (c) Nanouid samples
after 10 months.
by Yiamsawas et al. [14] and deduced that the theoretical model is not
really applicable for predicting viscosity of a nanouid. Viscosity does
has a signicant role in determining whether a specic nanouid
gives a better thermal performance than its base uid thru a ratio of
enhancement in viscosity over thermal conductivity, (C /Ck). Prasher
[15] studied that the enhancement of viscosity has to be lower than 4
compared to thermal conductivity in laminar range, while Garg [16]
specied the feasible limit to 5 in turbulent ow. If the ratio goes beyond
this limit, then the nanouid application in any specic case affectivity is
doubtful.
Electrical conductivity is less investigated of all thermo-physical
properties of nanouids. Sources of literatures on this property are
very scarce, perhaps due to the lack of nanouid applications in the electrically active thermal devices such as PEMFC. Electrical conductivity of
a nanouid is correlated to the ability of charged ions in the nanouid
mixture to carry electrons also termed as charges whenever an electric
potential is applied [17]. This is possible due to the formation of
electrical double layer (EDL) around the surface of the dispersed nanoparticles. The whole structure movement towards oppositely charged
electrode is measured as electrical conductivity of a nanouid.
Application in PEMFC cooling system would require electrical
conductivity properties as a judgment whether it is feasible or not for
the system. The electrical conductivity requirement which is as low as
1.5 to 2 S/cm [18] and 5 S/cm at 20 C [19] which need to be maintained over time. This is a big challenge as the coolant keeps receiving
ions from contamination of bipolar plate [20] and oxidation of glycol
[21] as it degrades. Elhamid et al. [22] and Gershun et al. [23] mentioned
in their patents that high electrical conductivity in the coolant will cause
shunt current and coolant electrolysis on the electrical appliance. Shunt
current will decrease the efciency of the electrical appliance. In
addition to that, it is harmful to the user.
Efforts has been made to encounter this by adding anti oxidant to
coolant [24] while these researchers have tackled this through kerosene
hydrocarbon coolant and addition of carboxylic acid to coolant consecutively [25,26]. Nanouid also been discovered by Mohapatra [27,28]
as a potential coolant which is capable of maintaining low electrical
Table 1
Properties of nanoparticles and base uid used in the experiment.
Nano particle/Base uid
Al2O3
Distilled water
Ethylene glycol
-8
6
1.07
Dielectic constant
Density , kg/m3
Reference
9.1-9.3
80
38
4000
999
1110
[38,39,52,53]
[4,38,39,51,54]
I. Zakaria et al. / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 61 (2015) 6168
Table 2
Volume of water and EG for each ratio.
EG concentration (%)
Volume of EG (ml)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
63
increased with a small volume concentration. The increment of electrical conductivity is up to 3457.1 % for volume concentration of 1.44 %.
The highest value of electrical conductivity was 314 S/cm and measured at 8.47 % of volume concentration.
Further investigation of electrical conductivity for Al2O3 nanouid is
carried by Ganguly et al. [30] and Minea and Luciu [38]. Ganguly et al.
[30] investigated on Al2O3 dispersed in deionized water. They measured
the effective electrical conductivity as a function of volume fraction
(0.005 to 0.03) and temperature (25 to 45 C). They concluded that
the volume fraction effect is more prominent than that of the temperature effect. Minea and Luciu [38] have measured electrical conductivity
of Al2O3 dispersed in water and observed that the electrical conductivity
has tremendously increased by 390.11 % at 60 C for 4 % volume fraction.
However, they mentioned that the conventional models such as
Maxwell [40] and Bruggeman [41] do not correlate to the ndings.
This observation is also supported by Sundar et al. [17].
Other available literatures on electrical conductivity property of
nanouid is on graphene nanouid which have been studied by
Kole and Dey [10] and Baby and Ramaprabhu [31]. Kole and Dey [10]
reported that enhancement of 8620 % for 0.395 % volume concentration
of hydrogen exfoliated graphene (HEG) in a base uid of 70:30 (EG: distilled water). On the other hand, Baby and Ramaprabhu [31] observed
that electrical conductivity value of 60 S/cm which is equivalent
to 1400 % enhancement for 0.03 % volume concentration of thermal
64
I. Zakaria et al. / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 61 (2015) 6168
mp
p
mp mb f
p
b f
!
100
2. Experimental Setup
2.1. Preparation of Nanouid
Nanoparticles used are Al2O3 with 99.8 % purity and 13 nm in size
which is procured from Sigma-Aldrich. The characterization of Al2O3
nanoparticle is obtained by the eld emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) technique [11]. The image of FESEM at magnication of
250,000 is shown in Fig. 1. The Al2O3 nanoparticles shape is observed
spherical. The based uid is the mixture of distilled water and ethylene
glycol AR grade with 99.9 % purity. Base uids were prepared by mixing
both distilled water and ethylene glycol to form 100 ml of base uid. The
split volumes of for both water and EG are tabulated in Table 2. The
nanouids are prepared by two steps method without using any surfactant. Measured quantity of Al2O3 nanoparticles is added to a pre determined volume of a base solution. The concentration of the nanouid
in volume percent, can be estimated with Eq. (1). The mass of particles
I. Zakaria et al. / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 61 (2015) 6168
65
keff
a)
b)
c)
p
b f
p
b f
p
b f
3. Mathematical Models
kp n1kb f n1 kb f kp
kb f
kp n1kb f kb f kp
Fig. 4. Thermal conductivity of base uid and various volume concentration of Al2O3
dispersed in water: EG mixtures.
TEC n f
n f kEG
31
21 b f
Fig. 5. Comparison of thermal conductivity with Hamilton and Crosser model [49].
66
I. Zakaria et al. / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 61 (2015) 6168
I. Zakaria et al. / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 61 (2015) 6168
67
Fig. 9. Comparison of effective electrical conductivity of Al2O3 at 0.3 % volume concentrations in all range of water - EG mixtures.
Fig. 11. Thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity ratio of Al2O3 at various volume
concentrations in all range of water - EG mixtures.
68
I. Zakaria et al. / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 61 (2015) 6168
5. Conclusions
Both thermal and electrical conductivities across a complete range of
base uid (water: EG) ratios have been experimentally determined.
Alterations to these properties due to dispersion of low concentration of
0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 % Al2O3 were also observed. Thermal conductivities of
0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 % Al2O3 are highest at pure water and slowly decreased
as the EG percentage is increased. It agrees well with Hamilton-crosser
model [49]. Thermal conductivities also observed to increase as a function
of volume concentration as expected. However, electrical conductivities
value is showing astounding result as alteration of 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 %
Al2O3 in its base uid no longer following the base uid electrical conductivity behavior. Base uid of pure water has one of the lowest electrical
conductivity of 2.42 S/cm but this has tremendously increased by 800,
1219 and 1440 % increment with dispersion of 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 % Al2O3
respectively. The signicant increment is observed for EG concentration
of 40 % and lower. This is under predicted by classical model of Maxwell
[40]. A thermo-electrical conductivity (TEC) ratio has been established
in order to assess the signicance of Al2O3 in electrically active thermal
device environment such as fuel cell. The high value of TEC ratio is
favorable but limitation to EG content of not exceeding 50 % need to be
complied in order to avoid risk of excessive allowable coolant pressure
to the cooling system. Further experimental work is needed in order to
verify the accuracy of the TEC ratio established.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)
and Universiti Malaysia Pahang for nancial supports given under
600-RMI/RAGS 5/3 (51/2013) and RDU1403110.
References
[1] R. Saidur, K.Y. Leong, H.A. Mohammad, A review on applications and challenges of
nanouids, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 15 (3) (2011) 16461668.
[2] S. Lee, S.U.S. Choi, S. Li, J.A. Eastman, Measuring Thermal Conductivity of Fluids
Containing Oxide Nanoparticles, J. Heat Transf. 121 (2) (1999) 280289.
[3] F.C. McQuiston, J.D. Parker, J.D. Spitler, Heating Ventilating and Air-conditioning,
John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 2000.
[4] ASHRAE, ASHRAE Handbook Fundamentals, Physical Properties of Secondary
Coolants (Brines)2009.
[5] J.A. Eastman, S.U.S. Choi, S. Li, W. Yu, L.J. Thompson, Anomalously increased effective
thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanouids containing copper nanoparticles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 (6) (2001) 718720.
[6] S.M.S. Murshed, K.C. Leong, C. Yang, Investigations of thermal conductivity and
viscosity of nanouids, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 47 (5) (2008) 560568.
[7] L. Syam Sundar, E. Venkata Ramana, M.K. Singh, A.C.M. Sousa, Thermal conductivity
and viscosity of stabilized ethylene glycol and water mixture Al2O3 nanouids for
heat transfer applications: An experimental study, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer
56 (2014) 8695.
[8] R.S. Vajjha, D.K. Das, Experimental determination of thermal conductivity of three
nanouids and development of new correlations, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 52
(2122) (2009) 46754682.
[9] J. Philip, P.D. Shima, Thermal properties of nanouids, Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci.
183184 (2012) 3045.
[10] M. Kole, T.K. Dey, Investigation of thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical
conductivity of graphene based nanouids, J. Appl. Phys. 113 (8) (2013) 084307.
[11] I.M. Mahbubul, R. Saidur, M.A. Amalina, Latest developments on the viscosity of
nanouids, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 55 (4) (2012) 874885.
[12] L. Syam Sundar, M.K. Singh, A.C.M. Sousa, Investigation of thermal conductivity and
viscosity of Fe3O4 nanouid for heat transfer applications, Int. Commun. Heat Mass
Transfer 44 (2013) 714.
[13] S.W. Lee, S.D. Park, S. Kang, I.C. Bang, J.H. Kim, Investigation of viscosity and thermal
conductivity of SiC nanouids for heat transfer applications, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
54 (13) (2011) 433438.
[14] T. Yiamsawas, O. Mahian, A.S. Dalkilic, S. Kaewnai, S. Wongwises, Experimental
studies on the viscosity of TiO2 and Al2O3 nanoparticles suspended in a mixture
of ethylene glycol and water for high temperature applications, Appl. Energy 111
(2013) 4045.
[15] R. Prasher, D. Song, J. Wang, P. Phelan, Measurements of nanouid viscosity and its
implications for thermal applications, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (13) (2006) 133108.
[16] J. Garg, B. Poudel, M. Chiesa, J.B. Gordon, J.J. Ma, J.B. Wang, Z.F. Ren, Y.T. Kang, H.
Ohtani, J. Nanda, G.H. McKinley, G. Chen, Enhanced thermal conductivity and
viscosity of copper nanoparticles in ethylene glycol nanouid, J. Appl. Phys. 103
(7) (2008) 074301.
[17] L.S. Sundar, K. Shusmitha, M.K. Singh, A.C.M. Sousa, Electrical conductivity enhancement of nanodiamondnickel (NDNi) nanocomposite based magnetic nanouids,
Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 57 (2014) 17.
[18] [18]McMullen P, Mohapatra S,Donovan E. Advances in PEM Fuel Cell Nano-Coolant,
ed, 2013.
[19] B.P.S.I. Ballard, FCgen-1310 Fuel Cell Stack, 2012.
[20] Dill NJ. Fuel cell stack coolant conductivity monitoring circuit, ed: US Patent
6,838,201, 2005
[21] G. Zhang, S.G. Kandlikar, A critical review of cooling techniques in proton exchange
membrane fuel cell stacks, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37 (3) (2012) 24122429.
[22] MHA, Elhamid, YM, Mikhail, RH, Blunk, DJ, Lisi. Inexpensive dielectric coolant for
fuel cell stacks, ed: Google Patents, 2004
[23] Gershun AV, Jeffcoate CS, Marinho FJ,Woyciesjes PM. Heat transfer compositions
with high electrical resistance for fuel cell assemblies, ed: Google Patents, 2009.
[24] T. Takashiba, S. Yagawa, Development of fuel cell coolant, Honda R&D C0.Ltd, 2009.
[25] Elhamid MHA, Mikhail YM, Blunk RH,Lisi DJ, "Inexpensive dielectric coolant for fuel
cell stacks," US Patent, 2004
[26] J-P, Maes, S,Lievens. "Method for fuel cell coolant systems," US Patent US 7,201,982
B2, 2007
[27] C.Mohapatra S, "fuel cell and fuel cell coolant compositions," united state of america
Patent 7,138,199, 2006.
[28] J. Mock, P. McMullen, S. Mohapatra, Fuel Cell Coolant Optimization and scale up
(2012) [Online].
[29] K.F.V. Wong, T. Kurma, Transport properties of alumina nanouids, Nanotechnology
19 (34) (2008) 345702.
[30] S. Ganguly, S. Sikdar, S. Basu, Experimental investigation of the effective electrical
conductivity of aluminum oxide nanouids, Powder Technol. 196 (3) (2009)
326330.
[31] T.T. Baby, S. Ramaprabhu, Investigation of thermal and electrical conductivity of
graphene based nanouids, J. Appl. Phys. 108 (12) (2010) 124308.
[32] T.P. Teng, C.M. Cheng, F.Y. Pai, Preparation and characterization of carbon nanouid by
a plasma arc nanoparticles synthesis system, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 (1) (2011) 111.
[33] S. Sikdar, S. Basu, S. Ganguly, Investigation of electrical conductivity of titanium
dioxide nanouids, Int. J. Nano. 4 (4) (2011) 336349.
[34] J.N. Solanki, Z.V.P. Murthy, Preparation of silver Nanouids with High Electrical
Conductivity, J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 32 (5) (2011) 724730.
[35] H. Konakanchi, R. Vajjha, D. Misra, D. Das, Electrical conductivity measurements of
nanouids and development of new correlations, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11 (8)
(2011) 67886795.
[36] T.T. Baby, R. Sundara, Synthesis and transport properties of metal oxide decorated
graphene dispersed nanouids, J. Phys. Chem. C 115 (17) (2011) 85278533.
[37] L.P. Shen, H. Wang, M. Dong, Z.C. Ma, H.B. Wang, Solvothermal synthesis and electrical conductivity model for the zinc oxide-insulated oil nanouid, Phys. Lett. A 376
(1011) (2012) 10531057.
[38] A.A. Minea, R.S. Luciu, Investigations on electrical conductivity of stabilized water
based Al2O3 nanouids, Microuid. Nanouid. 13 (6) (2012) 977985.
[39] K.G.K. Sarojini, S.V. Manoj, P.K. Singh, T. Pradeep, S.K. Das, Electrical conductivity of
ceramic and metallic nanouids, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 417 (2013)
3946.
[40] J.C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Second edition Oxford
University Press, Cambridge, U.K, 1904.
[41] D.A.G. Bruggeman, Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von
heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitatskonstanten und Leitfahigkeiten der
Mischkorper aus isotropen Substanzen, Ann. Phys. Leipzig 24 (1935) 636679.
[42] W.H. Azmi, K.V. Sharma, P.K. Sarma, R. Mamat, S. Anuar, Comparison of convective
heat transfer coefcient and friction factor of TiO2 nanouid ow in a tube with
twisted tape inserts, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 81 (2014) 8493.
[43] W.H. Azmi, K.V. Sharma, P.K. Sarma, R. Mamat, S. Anuar, Rao V. Dharma, Experimental determination of turbulent forced convection heat transfer and friction factor
with SiO2 nanouid, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 51 (2013) 103111.
[44] Dynalene. Dynalene FC, D. Inc, Ed., ed, 2013.
[45] D. Wen, Y. Ding, Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of
nanouids at the entrance region under laminar ow conditions, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transf. 47 (24) (2004) 51815188.
[46] H.A. Mintsa, G. Roy, C.T. Nguyen, D. Doucet, New temperature dependent thermal
conductivity data for water-based nanouids, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 48 (2) (2009)
363371.
[47] Y. He, Y. Jin, H. Chen, Y. Ding, D. Cang, H. Lu, Heat transfer and ow behaviour of
aqueous suspensions of TiO2 nanoparticles (nanouids) owing upward through
a vertical pipe, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 50 (1112) (2007) 22722281.
[48] Y. Ding, H. Alias, D. Wen, R.A. Williams, Heat transfer of aqueous suspensions of
carbon nanotubes (CNT nanouids), Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 49 (12) (2006)
240250.
[49] R.L. Hamilton, O.K. Crosser, Thermal Conductivity of Heterogeneous Two Component
Systems, 1I & EC Fundamentals, 1962. 187191.
[50] R.C.D. Cruz, J. Reinshagen, R. Oberacker, A.M. Segades, M.J. Hoffmann, Electrical
conductivity and stability of concentrated aqueous alumina suspensions, J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 286 (2) (2005) 579588.
[51] Companies TMGo. Ethylene Glycol Product Guide, T. M. G. o. Companies, Ed., ed: The
MEGlobal Group of Companies, 2008.
[52] B.C. Pak, Y.I. Cho, Hydrodynamic and Heat transfer study of dispersed uids with
submicron metallic oxide particles, Exp. Heat Transfer 11 (2) (1998) 151170.
[53] Aldrich S. Safety, Data Sheet, Aluminium Oxide, 2013.
[54] A. Cengel, Y, A, M. Boles, Thermodynamics - An engineering approach vol, 6th edition
Mc Graw Hill, 2007.