Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03 When Science Meets Religion
03 When Science Meets Religion
Ian Barbour,
SPCK, 2000. 205 pages.
Reviewed by Howard Taylor.
Ian Barbour is a major contributor to the fast growing subject of Science and
Religion in Interface. (He tells us that in the 1990s 211 books per year were
published on the subject.) Recently he was a winner of the prestigious
Templeton Prize for progress in Religion. This is one of Barbour's smaller
books which is meant to give an overview of the various beliefs, discussions
and arguments that are most important for the subject. However a new comer
to the subject would be advised first to read a simpler introduction such as
John Polkinghorne's `Quarks, Chaos and Christianity', and then turn to books
such as this.
What is it all about?
For millennia philosophers and theologians have attempted to address such
questions as:
1. Is the universe eternal or did it begin?
2. Does the rational structure of the universe mean it must be the product of a
great Mind?
3. Is there any purpose to human existence?
4. What is life and how has it developed?
5. Can the experiences of consciousness and self-awareness be reduced to the
properties of the brain or do they imply the existence of a soul?
It is in the latter part of the 20th Century that some scientists have tried to get
to grips with these most fundamental of fundamental questions. The
discussion continues in the 21st Century and hence the increasing interest in
the subject.
Ian Barbour is well known for his four models of the science-religion
relationship namely:
1 Conflict (Galileo, Darwin, Dawkins, and Young Earth Creationism etc.)
2 Independence (Stephen Jay Gold: they both address genuine issues but there
is no overlap between them).
3 Dialogue (science raises questions that it can't answer - questions that
religions usually address).
4 Integration. (There is enough overlap between science and religion's quest
for truth that a genuine search for truth in one can illuminate the other.)
Each chapter in the book is built round this scheme. The main chapters are:
Astronomy and Creation; The Implications of Quantum Physics; Evolution
their claim is that they are pro-science. As examples of the conflict model he
refers to two astrophysicists: Gerald Schroeder (an orthodox Jew) and Hugh
Ross (an evangelical Christian who turned to Christianity after reflecting on
the significance of discoveries in Maths and Physics). Neither is a young earth
creationist and each accept the Big-Bang cosmology. But each holds relatively
conservative theological views and both attempt to back up their theology
from their physics. Both, I am sure, would put themselves in the 'integration'
category but Ian Barbour places them firmly in the opposite 'conflict' category.
Although he disagrees with some of Hugh Ross's views on the significance of
Relativity and a multi-dimensional universe, he places them both in the
conflict category mainly because he disagrees with their religious views. My
question is then: Is present-day scientific respectability together with a
relatively liberal theology necessary if one is to be granted a place in the
dialogue or integration categories? Surely that must not be the case.
A possible omission.
Ian Barbour says he is writing from a Christian perspective.
When most people think of Christianity they think of prayer and worship and
beliefs about Jesus Christ. There is little or nothing in the book about these
topics. It is not as though scientists don't write about how their scientific view
of the world relates to their experience of answered prayer or their beliefs
about incarnation and atonement- some scientists who Ian Barbour clearly
respects definitely do and very helpfully. Although one cannot expect him to
cover everything, discussion of these topics would have added greatly to the
interest of the book and also given it more 'warmth'.
The Contents and also the Index pages (names and topics separately), as well
as the endnotes are very good and helpful.
Apart from a few criticisms mentioned above, the book is so clear, succinct
and wide ranging that I certainly recommend it.