Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6B Report
6B Report
REPORT
ON
SOIL INVESTIGATION
FOR
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
AT
SS-6B AREA
AT
HPCL
VISAKH REFINERY
VISAKHAPATNAM
ANDHRA PRADESH
J.J. ASSOCIATES(VISAKHAPATNAM)
AETP(P) LIMITED
#11-6-3, RockDale Layout, MaharaniPeta,
Table of Contents
Tables and Figures (Enclosures)............................................................................................
1
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY..............................................................................1-2
Site Plan
1. INTRODUCTION
M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited proposed to conduct Soil Investigation at
SS-6B Area in DHT project at Visakha Refinery ,Visakhapatnam. Accordingly, land soil
investigations were envisaged to evolve various soil/rock parameters in order to carry
out engineering analysis and foundation design. In this connection, the soil investigation
work was awarded to M/s J.J.Associates (VSKP) AETP Pvt Ltd., Visakhapatnam vide
Purchase order No. 9000163-OQ-10004 dated 11/2/2010 to carry out the land soil
investigations at the proposed site.
Broad objectives of the investigations are as follows.
(a)
(b)
2. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work includes drilling of One(1) Land Boreholes at SS-6B Area.
Location of the boreholes is presented in the enclosed figure. Borehole Locations
sketch provided by M/S TOYO ENGINEERING CORPORATION / HPCL.
The scope also includes carrying out field tests like Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in
boreholes, collection of disturbed and undisturbed soil samples and carrying out the
relevant laboratory tests on collected soil samples.
3. INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY
The details of the drilling rigs and methodology of boring are explained in the following
sections. Boreholes were terminated as per the direction of Engineer In charge.
After positioning the rig at the specified location, for drilling through soil. Borehole was
sunk by mechanically operated Cable Tool (Shell & Auger) in soil and Rotary drilling in
rock. Flush jointed steel casing tubes were provided to prevent possibility of side
collapse in boreholes. After reaching the desired depth, depending upon the soil layer
encountered, either Standard Penetration Tests & Vane Shear Tests were conducted or
Undisturbed or disturbed soil samples were collected.
The location of the boreholes is shown in the enclosed sketch. The field tests and sample
collections were conducted in the boreholes in accordance with the relevant Indian
Standard codes of practice and as per the following.
(a)
(b)
4. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS
4.1 Standard Penetration Tests
Standard penetration tests (SPT) were carried out in soil within boreholes to determine
strength characteristics of soil. This was carried out in accordance with IS: 2131. The
number of blows required to drive the standard split spoon sampler for penetration of
0.30 m by a 63.5 kg hammer falling freely from a height of 750 mm is recorded N
Value at regular intervals in the borehole. If the sampler is not fully penetrating into soil,
then the test was terminated after refusal noting the rate of penetration.
4.2 Sampling
Disturbed & Undisturbed representative soil samples were collected during investigations
and subsequently sent to laboratory for visual examination and testing. The disturbed
soil samples were also collected from split spoon sampler.
5. LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
All collected soil samples from the boreholes were brought to laboratory for necessary
testing and rechecking the preliminary borelogs. The laboratory tests comprised of
a.
Grain size distribution was determined in two stages. The soil fraction retained on 75
micron IS Sieve was analysed by Sieve analysis using standard set of IS Sieve as
prescribed by IS 460 1962. Sieve analysis is again done in two stages. The oven dried
samples of soil was separated into two fractions by passing it through 4.75mm IS Sieve.
The portion passing through the sieve was analysed by fine analysis using the IS Sieve
Nos. 2mm, 1mm, 500, 425, 300, 212, 150 and 75 microns. The portion retained on this
sieve was analysed by coarse analysis using IS Sieve Nos. 100, 60, 20, 10 and 4.75mm.
b.
Liquid limit of the soil was determined by Casagrande method using Casagrande type
mechanical liquid limit apparatus. Plastic limit was determined as per the standard
procedure.
c.
Natural moisture content of the soil was determined by oven drying method as per IS :
2720 Part II, 1969. Weights were taken to an accuracy of 0.001gr.
d.
Bulk density and dry density of the undisturbed soil samples were evaluated as per
IS:2720
e.
Triaxial Test.
The encountered strata was stiff in consistency, careful attention is made to extract
sample from the tube. The test is conducted as per part of IS 2720.
f.
Specific gravity test was conducted on the soil fraction passing through 425 micron
I.S.Sieve by density bottle method or by pycnometer. All weights are taken to an
accuracy of 0.001 gr. and the tests were conducted at 27C.
g.
Chemical Analysis for soil and water were carried out for PH value chlorides, sulphates
and organic matter and the results are enclosed in the report.
h.
Consolidation tests
Consolidation tests were conducted on vertical drainage using Fixed ring cell type
consolidometer. The soil specimens were allowed to consolidate under pressure
increments of 0.01, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 kg/cm . The pressures were
unloaded through increments of 4.00, 2.00, 1.00, 0.50, 0.25 and 0.01 kg/cm. Each
pressure increment was maintained constant per 24 hours. The vertical compression was
measured after the application of each pressure increment after the following elapsed
times, 0, 0.25, 1.00, 2.25, 4.00, 6.25, 9.20, 12, 25, 16.00, 20.25, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81,
100, 225, 400, 720 and 1440 minutes.
Note : The Possible tests are only conducted if samples were collected. In some case soil
samples could not be collected as rock is met at shallow depth.
0.00 to 1.00m
Filled
material
1.00m to 2.50m
up 7 to 11
Weathered
rock
31 to 43
46 to 62
CL-SC
Depth Below GL
No.
Soil type
(m)
FROM
TO
0.00
1.00
Filled up
Average
Cu
2
N-Value
t/m
degree
t/m3
2.10
material
2
1.00
2.50
8.2 Analysis
SAFE BERING CAPACITY FROM SHEAR CRITERIA IN BOREHOLE 7
Safe Bearing Capacity from shear criteria at a depth of 2.50m
Qns = (2/3 CNC SC DC IC + r Df (NQ-1) SQ DQ IQ + 0.5r BNr Sr Dr Ir Wr| ) / FS
C = Cohesion intercept = 0 kg/cm2
= 36
= IF( <=28,(TAN- (0.67*TAN )Else )
NC NQ Nr = Bearing capacity factors which are obtained by interpolation
Here NC = 51.96 NQ = 39.48 Nr = 60.31
SC SQ Sr = Shape factors which are 1.00 for Strip and 1.30 for Square
IC IQ Ir = Inclination factors
N = tan2(((22/7)/4) + (/2) )
DC = 1 + ( 0.2 x (Depth / Width) x N) here it is 1.491
DQ = Dr = 1 for > 10
DQ = Dr = 1 + ( 0.1 x (Depth/Breadth) x N) for > 10
Here Dr = DQ = 1.246
Qns = Safe Bearing Capacity
Factor of safety : 3.00
Safe Bearing Capacity from shear criteria at a depth of 2.50m
S No.
Depth (m)
Width
(m)
Capacity in t/m2
Strip
Square
2.50
2.00
2.00
115.42
126.94
2.50
3.00
3.00
120.46
128.76
2.50
4.00
4.00
128.26
133.90
2.50
5.00
5.00
137.16
140.36
2.50
6.00
6.00
146.61
147.48
Taking N = 50,
SBC Calculation as per IS:8009 (Part-I)-1976 from Settlement Criteria at a
depth of 2.50m below G.L(i:e) at R.L +2.997 in Bore Hole-7.
S No.
Depth of
Width of
Settlement
Allowable bearing
Foundation
Foundation
Pressure for
(m)
(m)
10t/m2
settlement(t/m2)
2.50
2.00
4.70
53.19
2.50
3.00
5.20
48.08
2.50
4.00
5.50
45.45
2.50
5.00
5.60
44.64
Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions prevailing at the site and based
on field and laboratory investigation results, the following recommendations have been
made for foundations of proposed constructions.
1. Shallow Foundations
a) As Hard strata is met at shallow depth and taking both shear criteria & settlement
criteria into consideration raft foundation/ isolated column footings should be
adopted at the depths mentioned below with the following safe bearing capacities.
BH No.
Location
Depth of foundation
(m)
SS-6B Area
30
Note:
1. Filled up material if any should be removed and foundation should be from
the natural ground level
2. Plinth beams are to be provided to safeguard the structure against differential
settlements if any.
b ) Due to presence of sulphates in water necessary precautions should be taken as
per IS 456-2000.
c) Back Filling material should be Rubble Soling and well compacted in layers of
150mm below PCC.
Project
: Proposed DHT project at Visakh Refinery.
Location
: SS-6B
Bore hole
: 7
Ground Water Table : 1.93m
BORELOG
Ground R.L.
From
To
+5.497
Depth Below
G.L.
(m)
From
+4.497
+2.997
1.00
DS-1
+4.497
1.00
1.00
1.50
2.50
Reddish clay
with pebbles
SPT-1
DS-2
+2.997
2.50
Highly
weathered
rock
3.50
SPT-2
DS-3
SPT-3
DS-4
+1.497
4.00
-0.503
6.00
Reddish clay
with pebbles
0.50
-1.003
6.50
2.50
-0.503
-0.503
6.00
6.00
-1.003
UDS Undisturbed Sample
Type
of
sample
Filled up soil
& boulders
1.00
+2.997
Thickness
of Strata
(m)
To
0.00
+4.497
Visual
Description
of strata
RL & Depth at
which sample
collected
(m)
GL
GRL
(m)
6.50
DS Disturbed Sample
DS-5
RL & Depth at
which SPT
conducted (m)
SPT
NValue
GRL
GL
(m)
15
cm
30
cm
45
cm
+3.997
1.50
+2.497
3.00
8 49 52(5 cm pen.)
>50
+0.997
4.50
58(5cm pen.)
>50
pen. Penetration
Core
recovery
%
RQD
%
Remarks
13
Project
: Proposed DHT project at Visakh Refinery.
Location
: SS-6B
Bore hole
: 7
Ground Water Table : 1.93m
Ground R.L.
From
To
-1.003
-2.003
-3.003
-4.503
-6.003
-6.503
-7.503
-9.003
Depth Below
G.L.
(m)
From
Visual
Description
of strata
Thickness
of Strata
(m)
To
6.50
-2.003
-3.003
-4.503
-6.003
-6.503
-7.503
-9.003
-9.853
7.50
8.50
10.00
11.50
12.00
13.00
14.50
Type
of
sample
7.50
8.50
10.00
11.50
12.00
13.00
14.50
15.35
Highly
weathered
rock
9.03
SPT-4
DS-6
DS-7
SPT-5
DS-8
DS-9
SPT-6
DS-10
SPT-7
SPT-8
RL & Depth at
which SPT
conducted (m)
SPT
NValue
-1.003
GL
(m)
6.50
15
30
45
cm
cm
cm
53(10cm pen.)
>53
-3.003
8.50
56(5cm pen.)
>50
-6.003
11.50
73(10cm pen.)
>73
-7.503
-9.853
13.00
15.35
81(8cm pen.)
100(no pen.)
>81
>100
GRL
7.50
8.50
10.00
11.50
13.00
Core
recovery
%
RQD
%
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
3
2
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Remarks
DS Disturbed Sample
pen. Penetration
Sl No.
BH
No
Sample
No.
Type of
sample
RL & Depth at
which sample
collected
GRL
GL
(m)
SPT
+3.997
1.50
DS
+2.997
2.50
DS
+1.497
4.00
Gradation Analysis
Natural
moisture
content
(%)
Bulk
Density
(g/cc)
9.76
16.22
-
Dry
Density
(g/cc)
Consistency Limits
FINES
Triaxial Test
UU
Specific
gravity
ISC
CL
2.64
SC
Clay
Liquid
Limit
(%)
Plastic
Limit
(%)
Plastici
ty
Index
(%)
C
(kg/cm)
degree
42.00
13.00
34
19
15
32.00
7.00
24
13
11
Gravel
(%)
Sand
(%)
Silt
10.00
35.00
0.00
61.00
0.00
90.00
10.00
NP
S.No.
BH
No.
Depth at which
sample collected
G.L
G.R.L.
(m)
+2.997
2.50
P
7.20
Sulphates Chlorides
%
%
0.002
0.005
Organic
Matter
%
nil
S.No.
BH
No.
Depth at which
sample collected
G.L
G.R.L.
(m)
+3.567
1.93
P
7.40
Sulphates Chlorides
mg/l
mg/l
320
118
Organic
Matter
mg/l
11
Project
Location
0.00
+5.497
Filled up soil &
boulders
1.00
Reddish clay
with pebbles
2.50
Highly
weathered rock
6.00
+4.497
N=13@+3.997
+2.997
N>50@+2.497
N>50@+0.997
-0.503
Reddish clay
with pebbles
6.50
Highly
weathered rock
15.35
-1.003
N>53@-1.003
N>50@-3.003
N>73@-6.003
N>81@-7.503
N>100@-9.853
-9.853