Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Relationship Between Plasma Cytokine PDF
The Relationship Between Plasma Cytokine PDF
Abstract
Objective: In adults there is growing evidence that antidepressant (AD) treatment results in a decline in inflammatory
cytokines. This is the first report, to our knowledge, of the relationship between response to selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitor (SSRI) treatment for anxiety and/or depression and cytokine levels in children and adolescents.
Methods: Forty-one patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) criteria for
major depressive disorder (MDD) or anxiety disorders participated in study. Their ages ranged from 9 to 18 (14.12 2.30)
years. The patients were treated with fluoxetine for 8 weeks. Plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a,
interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1b were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) before and after fluoxetine
treatment. Clinical response was measured with several scales, including the Childrens Depression Rating ScaleRevised
(CDRS-R), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED)
Results: The overall response rate was 56%. Antidepressant treatment significantly reduced TNF-a levels ( p = 0.037), with no
significant changes in the levels of IL-6 and IL-1b. All three proinflammatory cytokines were significantly ( p < 0.05) higher in
SSRI-refractory than in SSRI-responsive patients.
Conclusions: Higher levels of TNF-a, IL-6, and IL-1b might predict nonresponse to fluoxetine treatment in children.
Keywords: children and adolescent, SSRI, cytokines, depression, anxiety
Introduction
Department of Psychological Medicine, Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
3
The Ruhman Family Laboratory for Research on the Neurobiology of Stress, Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
4
Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
5
The Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
6
Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel.
7
Department of Stress Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
8
Research Unit, Geha Mental Health Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
2
727
728
following AD treatment (Miller et al. 2009; Hannestad et al. 2011;
Hodes et al. 2015). To date, reports regarding the effects of SSRIs
on cytokine levels are inconsistent in adults, and do not exist in the
pediatric population.
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines can predict response to
treatment and/or altered after fluoxetine treatment in children and
adolescents with depression and/or anxiety disorders. Our hypotheses, based on adult literature, were that fluoxetine will demonstrate anti-inflammatory properties as reflected by a decrease in
proinflammatory cytokines, and that such effect will be associated
with a favorable treatment response. Moreover, we hypothesized
that depressed and anxious patients with increased inflammatory
cytokines will exhibit treatment resistance.
Methods
AMITAI ET AL.
Cytokine analysis
Blood samples were collected from all subjects prior to starting
treatment and after 8 weeks of fluoxetine treatment. From each
participant in the research, blood samples were collected between 9
a.m. and 11 a.m. and plasma was separated for determination of
tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1b.
Measurements of the cytokines for all participants were conducted
in duplicate by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)
in the same run, to avoid interassay variability. All cytokines
were assessed with a sandwich ELISA based on a monoclonalmonoclonal antibody pair and a biotin-streptavidin amplification
system (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Los Angeles,
CA), following the manufacturers protocol. The laboratory staff
was blinded to the clinical data, and the clinician team was blinded
to the laboratory data.
Study design
Statistics
Evaluation
Subjects were assessed at intake, and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks.
Diagnostic evaluation was conducted using the Hebrew version
of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for
School-Age ChildrenPresent and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL)
(Kaufman et al. 1997; Shanee et al. 1997). Overall clinical
severity and improvement were assessed using the CGI-S and
CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) subscales, respectively (Guy 1976).
Continuous measures of depression and anxiety were obtained
using the Childrens Depression Rating ScaleRevised (CDRS-R)
(Poznanski et al. 1984), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
(Smucker et al. 1986), and the Screen for Child Anxiety Related
Emotional Disorders (SCARED) (Birmaher et al. 1997, 1999).
Procedure
The study was approved by the Schneider Childrens Hospital
Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained by
the subjects and their parents. After a confirmatory diagnostic assessment, all subjects received fluoxetine. Starting dosage for all
patients was 10 mg/day for 1 week, which then was increased to
20 mg/day through week 4. If the degree of improvement was
minimal (CGI-I 3) then the dosage of fluoxetine was increased
from 20 to 40 mg/day on week 5.
Results
Subjects
Forty-one subjects (22 [54%] males and 19 [46%] females, age
14.12 2.30 years) were included in the analysis. Of the 41 subjects, 24 (59%) had a diagnosis of MDD. The other 17 (41%) had a
diagnosis of anxiety disorder (GAD [n = 13], social anxiety disorder
[n = 6], PD [n = 6], SAD [n = 8], SP [n = 11]; some of the subjects
had more than one anxiety disorder). Nine (22%) had a combined
diagnosis of depressive disorder and anxiety disorder.
Table 1. Comparison of Demographic/Clinical Variables
of Responders and Nonresponders to Fluoxetine
Characteristics
Responders
(n = 23)
Gender (male)
14 (61%)
Age (years)
13.70 2.43
BMI (kg/m2)
21.10 4.14
DSM-IV-TR diagnosis (n)
Anxiety
9 (39%)
Depression
12 (52%)
Comorbid
2 (9%)
CGI-S
5.22 0.39
BDI
16.80 8.28
CDRS-R
59.17 20.63
SCARED
26.90 10.19
p value
(v2, t test or
Nonresponders MannWhitney
test)
(n = 18)
8 (44%)
14.67 2.20
21.37 4.07
8 (44%)
3 (17%)
7 (39%)
5.00 0.69
20.33 11.50
55.06 20.10
33.61 14.26
v2 = 1.10
p = 0.30
p = 0.17
p = 0.90
v2 = 7.74
p = 0.02
p = 0.24
p = 0.39
p = 0.49
p = 0.14
Posttreatment
Mean SD
TNF-a (pg/mL)
5.58 6.51
3.55 3.07
IL-6 (pg/mL)
0.35 0.17
0.31 0.12
IL-1b (pg/mL)
0.62 0.34
0.76 1.08
p value
(paired t test)
Mean SD
729
scores (see Table 1). Pretreatment cytokines were significantly
higher in the nonresponse groups in all the three cytokines measured (Table 3 and Fig. 1).
Posttreatment cytokine levels remained higher in the nonresponse group; however, this difference was significant only in
t = 2.13
df = 40
p = 0.037
t = 1.26
df = 40
p = NS
t = -1.00
df = 37
p = NS
Clinical response
Twenty-three subjects (56%) received a rating of very much
improved or much improved on the CGI-I, and were identified
as responders. The demographic and clinical data of the responders
and nonresponders are shown in Table 1. Eight of the responders
were treated with a dose of 40 mg/day. The mean CDRS decreased
from 59.17 (SD = 20.63) to 34.93 (SD = 14.34) (paired t = 7.07,
df = 40, p < 0.0001), and mean BDI score decreased from 18.50
(SD = 9.85) to 10.10 (SD = 10.42) after the treatment period (paired
t = 6.10, df = 40, p < 0.0001). Mean SCARED score decreased from
29.83 (SD = 12.50) to 21.49 (SD = 15.61) after the treatment period
(paired t = 4.07, df = 40, p < 0.0001).
Cytokines
Levels of TNF-a significantly decreased following SSRI treatment (paired t: 5.58 6.51 vs. 3.55 3.07, t = 2.13, df = 40,
p = 0.037). No significant differences were observed in the levels of
IL-6 and IL-1b (Table 2). No correlation was found between pretreatment cytokine levels and age, gender, diagnosis, or body mass
index (BMI) (data not shown). There was also no correlation between pretreatment cytokine levels and levels of anxiety or depression as measured by the scales scores (data not shown).
Responders versus nonresponders
There were no significant difference in baseline characteristics,
including age ( p = 0.17), gender ( p = 0.30), and BMI ( p = 0.90)
between the responder and nonresponder groups. With regard to
diagnosis, a more favorable response rate was observed in the depressed group than in the anxiety group (see Table 1). Also, no
significant difference was found regarding the pretreatment scales
Table 3. Pretreatment Cytokine Levels
in the Responders versus Nonresponders
Characteristics
Responders
Nonresponders
p value
MannWhitney
test
TNF-a (pg/mL)
IL-6 (pg/mL)
IL-1b (pg/mL)
3.81 3.04
0.28 0.10
0.51 0.23
7.85 8.84
0.42 0.20
0.76 0.40
p = 0.04
p = 0.006
p = 0.007
730
AMITAI ET AL.
Table 4. Comparison of Responders and Nonresponders in the Alterations (D) of the Various
Variables Following Fluoxetine Treatment
p
Responders
Week
BDI
16.80 8.28
4.70 3.55
CDRS-R
59.17 20.63 29.96 7.83
SCARED
26.90 10.19 14.61 10.03
TNF-a (pg/mL) 3.81 3.04
2.33 1.20
IL-6 (pg/mL)
0.28 0.10
0.28 0.13
IL-1b (pg/mL)
0.51 0.23
0.61 0.54
Nonresponders
D
p Time
p
p Time
effect Response by response
0.005
0.43
0.003
0.006
0.003
0.17
0.001
0.01
0.02
0.51
0.20
0.76
731
References
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., Text Revision. Washington, DC:
American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
Bernstein GA Shaw K: Practice parameters for the assessment and
treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. J Am
Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36(10 Suppl):69S84S, 1997.
Birmaher B, Brent D, Benson RS: Summary of the practice parameters for
the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with depressive
disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 37:12341238, 1998.
Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M:
Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related
Emotional Disorders (SCARED): A replication study. J Am Acad
Child Adolesc Psychiatry 38:12301236, 1999.
Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent DA, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J,
Neer SM: The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional
Disorders (SCARED): Scale construction and psychometric
characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:545
553, 1997.
Bucker J, Fries GR, Kapczinski F, Post RM, Yatham LN, Vianna P,
Bogo Chies JA, Gama CS, Magalhaes PV, Aguiar BW, Pfaffenseller B, .KauerSantAnna M: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
and inflammatory markers in school-aged children with early
trauma. Acta Psychiatr Scand 131:360368, 2015.
Dantzer R, OConnor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW: From
inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system
subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:4656, 2008.
Dowlati Y, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, Liu H, Sham L, Reim EK,
Lanctot KL: A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression. Biol
Psychiatry 67:446457, 2010.
Eller T, Vasar V, Shlik J, Maron E: Pro-inflammatory cytokines and
treatment response to escitalopram in major depressive disorder.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32:445450, 2008.
Guy W: Clinical Global Improvement Scale. Assessment Manual of
Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental
Health; 1976.
Hannestad J, DellaGioia N, Bloch M: The effect of antidepressant
medication treatment on serum levels of inflammatory cytokines: A
meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:24522459, 2011.
Henje Blom E, Lekander M, Ingvar M, Asberg M, Mobarrez F, Serlachius EE: Pro-inflammatory cytokines are elevated in adolescent
females with emotional disorders not treated with SSRIs. J Affect
Disord 136:716723, 2012.
Hiles SA, Baker AL, de Malmanche T, Attia, J: Interleukin-6, C-reactive
protein and interleukin-10 after antidepressant treatment in people
with depression: A meta-analysis. Psychol Med 42:20152026, 2012.
Ipser JC, Stein DJ, Hawkridge S, Hoppe L: Pharmacotherapy for
anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev:CD005170, 2009.
Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, Ryan N: Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age ChildrenPresent and Lifetime Version
(K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry 36:980988, 1997.
Kim JW, Szigethy EM, Melhem NM, Saghafi EM, Brent DA: Inflammatory markers and the pathogenesis of pediatric depression
and suicide: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Psychiatry
75:12421253, 2014.
Maalouf FT, Brent DA: Child and adolescent depression intervention
overview: What works, for whom and how well? Child Adolesc
Psychiatr Clin N Am 21:299312, 2012.
Miller AH, Maletic V, Raison CL: Inflammation and its discontents:
The role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression.
Biol Psychiatry 65:732741, 2009.
732
Mills NT, Scott JG, Wray NR, CohenWoods S, Baune BT: Research
review. The role of cytokines in depression in adolescents: A systematic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 54:816835, 2013.
Mitchell RH, Goldstein BI: Inflammation in children and adolescents
with neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review. J Am Acad
Child Adolesc Psychiatry 53:274296, 2014.
OBrien SM, Scully P, Fitzgerald P, Scott LV, Dinan TG: Plasma cytokine
profiles in depressed patients who fail to respond to selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitor therapy. J Psychiatr Res 41: 326331, 2007.
Poznanski EO, Grossman JA, Buchsbaum Y, Banegas M, Freeman L,
Gibbons R: Preliminary studies of the reliability and validity of the
childrens depression rating scale. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry
23:191197, 1984.
Rosenblat JD, Cha DS, Mansur RB, McIntyre RS: Inflamed moods:
a review of the interactions between inflammation and mood
disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 53:2334,
2014.
Shanee N, Apter A, Weizman A: Psychometric properties of the KSADS-PL in an Israeli adolescent clinical population. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 34:179186, 1997.
AMITAI ET AL.
Smucker MR, Craighead WE, Craighead LW, Green, BJ: Normative
and reliability data for the Childrens Depression Inventory. J
Abnorm Child Psychol 14:2539, 1986.
Yoshimura R, Hori H, IkenouchiSugita A, UmeneNakano W, Katsuki A, Atake K, Nakamura J: Plasma levels of interleukin-6 and
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor response in patients with major
depressive disorder. Hum Psychopharmacol 28:466470, 2013.
Yoshimura R, Hori H, IkenouchiSugita A, UmeneNakano W, Ueda
N, Nakamura J: Higher plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) level is associated with SSRI- or SNRI-refractory depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33:722726, 2009.