Zoya Belov Partial Transcript

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Case 2:08-cr-00427-MCE Document 436

Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
---oOo--BEFORE THE HONORABLE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., JUDGE
---oOo--UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.

No. 2:08-cr-00427

ALEXANDER POPOV,
RAMANATHAN PRAKASH, LANA
LE CHABRIER,
Defendants.
/

---oOo--REPORTER'S PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT


CROSS-EXAMINATION OF ZOYA BELOV
TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2011
---oOo---

Reported by:

DIANE J. SHEPARD, CSR #6331, RPR

DIANE J. SHEPARD, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC -- (916) 554-7460

Case 2:08-cr-00427-MCE Document 436


1

Filed 07/06/11 Page 2 of 8

APPEARANCES

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

For the Government:


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, California 95814
BY: PHILIP A. FERRARI
JEAN M. HOBLER
Assistant U.S. Attorneys

For the Defendant, Lana Le Chabrier


JAN DAVID KAROWSKY
Attorney at Law
716 19th Street, Suite 100
Sacramento, California 95811

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

For the Defendant, Alexander Popov:


RICHARD ALAN MOSS
Attorney at Law
255 South Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101

For the Defendant, Ramanathan Prakash:


RONALD NEIL RICHARDS
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 11480
Beverly Hills, California 90213

22
23
24
25

DIANE J. SHEPARD, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC -- (916) 554-7460

Case 2:08-cr-00427-MCE Document 436

Filed 07/06/11 Page 3 of 8

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2011

PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT

---oOo---

ZOYA BELOV,

a witness called by the Government, having been first duly

sworn by the Clerk to tell the truth, the whole truth, and

nothing but the truth, testified as follows:

CROSS-EXAMINATION

10

BY MR. RICHARDS:

11

Q.

Good afternoon.

12

A.

Good afternoon.

13

Q.

Isn't it true that you were instructed that it was

14

better if Dr. Popov and Dr. Prakash did not know about each

15

other?

16

A.

Yes.

17

Q.

And isn't it true that you were specifically told to

18

not let Dr. Prakash know that Dr. Popov worked at the clinic

19

because he was moody?

20

MR. FERRARI:

21

THE COURT:

22

MR. RICHARDS:

23

instruction.

24

single --

25

Objection.
Sustained.

Your Honor, every question was

They were instructing.

THE COURT:

Hearsay.

They asked every

Counsel, I have ruled.

DIANE J. SHEPARD, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC -- (916) 554-7460

Case 2:08-cr-00427-MCE Document 436


BY MR. RICHARDS:

Filed 07/06/11 Page 4 of 8

Q.

get any instructions about keeping Dr. Popov -- or Dr. Prakash

away from Dr. Popov?

MR. FERRARI:

THE COURT:

MR. FERRARI:

THE COURT:

overruled.

Q.

Did you ever get -- did you ever

Objection.

Hearsay.

Overruled.
Objection.
Sustained.

Hearsay.
Just as far as the yes or no,

Anything further sustained.


BY MR. RICHARDS:

Just yes or no.

Did you ever get

10

an instruction to not let Dr. Prakash know that Dr. Popov was

11

at the clinic?

12

THE COURT:

That will be an objection.

Sustained.

13

Because you're giving the answer to what you're asking in your

14

question.

15

If you want to ask a question, "have you ever had a

16

conversation" that's one thing.

17

is hearsay.

18

Q.

19

with your superior about not letting Dr. Prakash know that

20

Dr. Popov worked at the clinic?

21

THE COURT:

BY MR. RICHARDS:

But the remaining portion in

Did you ever have a conversation

Sustained.

22

Q.

23

instructions about keeping Dr. Popov a secret from Dr. Prakash?

24
25

BY MR. RICHARDS:

THE COURT:
Q.

Did you ever receive any

Sustained.

BY MR. RICHARDS:

Did you ever give a statement to

DIANE J. SHEPARD, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC -- (916) 554-7460

Case 2:08-cr-00427-MCE Document 436

Filed 07/06/11 Page 5 of 8

the Government that prior to Dr. Prakash's first visit to the

clinic, the staff had to get ready?

A.

Could you repeat that?

Q.

Remember -- haven't you indicated before that prior

to Dr. Prakash's first visit, the staff had to get the clinic

ready?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And isn't it true you were -- you had to get the

clinic ready because you wanted to have the appearance for

10

Dr. Prakash that it was a legitimate clinic?

11

MR. FERRARI:

12

THE COURT:

Objection.

Foundation.

Sustained.

13

Q.

BY MR. RICHARDS:

14

get the clinic ready, do you know what you meant by that?

15

A.

Yes.

16

Q.

And that means -- isn't it true getting the clinic

17

ready means making the clinic look presentable?

18

A.

19

order in the charts.

20

Q.

21

check the room and the refrigerators, do you remember that?

22

A.

Yes.

23

Q.

And do you remember Dr. Prakash being upset when he

24

saw a bottle of unfinished alcohol in the refrigerator?

25

A.

Yes.

When you previously said you had to

In our case, to prepare the charts, to make an

And when Dr. Prakash came to the clinic, you saw him

Yes.

It was in the area ruled the lunch area.

DIANE J. SHEPARD, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC -- (916) 554-7460

Case 2:08-cr-00427-MCE Document 436

Filed 07/06/11 Page 6 of 8

Q.

And isn't it true you told the Government that

Dr. Prakash was very picky?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And that he -- every paper in the file had to be in a

certain order?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And did you ever see -- isn't it true you never saw

Dr. Prakash and Dr. Popov together at the clinic?

A.

I never seen them.

10

Q.

And isn't it true that you knew never to call

11

Dr. Prakash and tell him that Dr. Popov worked at the clinic?

12

MR. FERRARI:

13

THE COURT:

Objection.

Foundation.

Sustained.

14

Q.

BY MR. RICHARDS:

15

to not tell Dr. Prakash that Dr. Popov worked at the clinic?

16

MR. FERRARI:

17

THE COURT:

18

MR. RICHARDS:

19

THE COURT:

20

Q.

21

instructed then --

22

Did someone specifically tell you

Objection.

Hearsay.

Sustained.
Your Honor, I'm just asking --

Sustained.

BY MR. RICHARDS:

Were you ever -- how were you

You previously testified that you were instructed

23

that it was better if Dr. Popov and Dr. Prakash did not know

24

about each other.

25

A.

Who instructed you about that?

Vardges.

DIANE J. SHEPARD, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC -- (916) 554-7460

Case 2:08-cr-00427-MCE Document 436


1

Q.

that Dr. -- let me strike that.

Filed 07/06/11 Page 7 of 8

And isn't it true, to the best of your knowledge,

You testified that you were switching the chief

complaints around of the patient?

MR. FERRARI:

THE COURT:

Objection.

Vague.

Sustained.

Q.

BY MR. RICHARDS:

Do you remember your testimony

where you were filling in the patient charts about the

patient's chief complaints that you just testified to?

10

A.

Yes.

11

Q.

And Sofia gave you the types of complaints to put in

12

the chart?

13

A.

Yes.

14

Q.

And isn't it true you never told Dr. Prakash that you

15

were doing that, correct?

16

A.

17
18
19

Yes.

I didn't tell him.

MR. RICHARDS:

Okay.

Thank you.

No further

questions.
(End of partial transcript.)

20
21
22
23
24
25

DIANE J. SHEPARD, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC -- (916) 554-7460

Case 2:08-cr-00427-MCE Document 436

Filed 07/06/11 Page 8 of 8

1
2

CERTIFICATION

3
4

I, Diane J. Shepard, certify that the foregoing is a

correct transcript from the record of proceedings in the

above-entitled matter.

7
8
9
10
11

/s/ DIANE J. SHEPARD


DIANE J. SHEPARD, CSR #6331, RPR
Official Court Reporter
United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

DIANE J. SHEPARD, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC -- (916) 554-7460

You might also like