Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THE Integrated Plant: Special Report
THE Integrated Plant: Special Report
THE Integrated Plant: Special Report
C O M
SPECIAL REPORT:
THE
INTEGRATED
PLANT
MODERN EXPECTATIONS
FOR BREAKFAST FOODS
PRESENT CHALLENGES FOR
PLANT OPERATIONS TEAMS
p3
TRACEABILITY FOR
STANDARD COMPLIANCE AND
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
p6
p8
PREVIOUS
NEXT
S pec i a l R eport
reakfast foods can be as unchanging as, well, oatmeal. But like any segment in the food business, the
expectations of consumers and by extension the demands on the food company are also subject to change and
innovation. And for those on the operations side, that means
the next adaptation headache may be right around the corner,
whether thats a matter of adjusting for a new formulation that
just doesnt behave the same way in the process or installing
new equipment for an additional package format.
Example No. 1: Suzie Crockett is a vice president-level
technology officer for health and nutrition at General Mills,
Minneapolis, where she also leads the Bell Institute of Health
and Nutrition, which helps the company come up with its
overall strategy for making its breakfast foods better-for-you.
And if that were not enough, she also blogs for the company
on its Taste of General Mills consumer blog site.
Part of this commitment is to continuously improve the
health profile of our existing products she wrote in a blog
post. These improvements are strongly tied to what consumers tell us (they want): healthy, great-tasting foods that fit their
lifestyles. However, they also tell us they wont compromise on
taste. So the guiding principle behind all our health improvements is the maxim: its not nutrition unless people eat it.
Example No. 2: Chobani, Norwich, N.Y., has in short order
not only won a horse race to become the leading U.S. brand
PREVIOUS
For these companies, and others making breakfast foods, production staff must work with product developers while continually staying on top of their own concerns. Chief among
them, of course, is avoiding food contamination, says Todd
3
NEXT
S pec i a l R eport
make up for any efficiencies that are lost when they operate
more carefully.
Key Technology Inc., Walla Walla, Wash., provides conveying and sorting systems to food processors and other industries. Clients include potato processors who make readyto-cook hash brown patties and fruit and nut processors, says
John Kadinger, market manager for Key.
When our breakfast food clients come to us, they are
mainly concerned with process efficiencies, Kadinger says.
They are looking at how they can improve those processes
and reduce their costs. Cost of labor is always an issue, so if
there are ways to add automation and improve the process efficiencies, they are always interested in that.
John McIsaac, vice president of business development for
Reiser, Canton, Mass., agrees. Clients are looking for efficiency in their operations. They want to produce more with
fewer resources.
Reiser manufactures and markets portioning and forming
equipment for meat and cheese processing, including equipment that makes sausages. Some of the best-selling models
include skinless sausage machines that can increase output by
30 percent, and equipment that allows for quick changeover.
Horizons Baker notes that processors of some breakfast
foods fall into the dry environment group that must pay especially close attention to the issue of combustible dust.
In part due to high profile incidents of the past 10 years,
the National Fire Prevention Administration has issued new
regulations regarding the risks of combustible dust. Those regulations affect candy makers, cereal mills and bakers as well
as other food and manufacturing entities, but enforcements
varies from state to state, and awareness is far from uniform,
Baker says.
Nice and easy
NEXT
PREVIOUS
NEXT
S pec i a l R eport
eoccurring incidents such as e-coli in spinach and dioxin in pork emphasize the rising importance of efficient
traceability. Tracking & tracing food, feed, and foodproducing animals through production and distribution stages
is proving vital to consumer safety and company reputations.
Food Safety regulations such as EU178/ 2002 or US Bioterrorism Act, as well as retail-driven standards, require food
suppliers to assure traceability on a one-up/one-down principle
but do not dictate methods. Some companies comply using
paper-based systems; others may require full networked computer and bar code systems to effectively meet requirements.
This paper focuses on in-plant traceability and discusses how
good traceability not only helps a manufacturer comply with
legal and regulatory requirements; it also shows how the right
systems and equipment can contribute to production efficiency
through better stock management and minimized waste.
What is Traceability?
General principles
Some general principles to consider when designing or challenging an existing traceability system include making sure
that it:
Covers all stages of production, processing and distribution
Identifies raw materials suppliers
Identifies which components have been used in which product
Identifies supplied customers
6
NEXT
S pec i a l R eport
Identifies which products and intermediates have been disposed of (verification of destruction may be required)
Ensures products supplied to customers are adequately labeled or identified to facilitate traceability
Provides details to authorities on-demand in a timely manner.
PREVIOUS
NEXT
S pec i a l R eport
Aside from regulations, unpredictable supply-chain or customer events may require investigation into production steps.
If defective batches appear, the root cause of the problem must
be identified and measures taken to ensure future product
quality and safety.
Essentially, food producers must document all processes
without gaps. This includes recipe development, quality lab,
production planning, monitoring, dispensing and packaging /
distribution. A computerized and intelligently networked formulation / weighing system is key.
A traceability system shall be in place which enables the
identification of product lots and their relation to batches in
direct contact with food, packaging intended or expected to
be in direct contact with food.
The traceability system shall incorporate all relevant processing and distribution records.
NEXT
S pec i a l R eport
closer to compliance with EU 178 / 2002; BRC; and Controls Used for Manufacturing, Processing, Packing, or Holding Dietary Supplements for FDA 21 CFR Part 111 CGMP
Regulations. This type of system is also vital for transparent
manufacturing processes and providing a proper decision base
for streamlining processes.
End-to-End Documentation
Tracking and tracing demands documentation of all production actions from goods receiving to endproduct shipment.
To be effective, manufacturers must ensure systems provide
relevant data quickly. Some governments request access even
within few hours.
Benefits of FormWeigh.Net
Increased productivity
Guaranteed consistent
product quality
Process safety and stability
Time savings
High flexibility
PREVIOUS
NEXT
Your Project
Our Weighing Components
Our catalog presents an in-depth look into the wide range of weighing components your projects require.
These components are designed for easy integration into machines, process plants, tanks, vessels,
hoppers, conveyor systems, and process instruments.
Download the new Weighing Components Catalog and learn more about
OEM Weighing Solutions from METTLER TOLEDO.
To learn more, call or visit
1-800-METTLER
www.mt.com/us-fp-weighmodules
PREVIOUS
10
NEXT