The Implication of Political Dynasty Towards Governance in Inabanga, Bohol

THE IMPLICATION OF POLITICAL DYNASTY TOWARDS
GOVERNANCE IN INABANGA, BOHOL
A Research Paper
In partial fulfilment of the
Final Requirement for English 19
By:
GUDES, Junbert E.
JAPOS, Gerard
October 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER I- THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

INTRODUCTION
Rationale.1
Theoretical Background.........3
THE PROBLEM
Statement of the Problem..................9
Statement of Hypothesis.......................9
Significance of the Study..............9
Scope and Limitation............11
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design...............12
Research Environment...........13
Research Participants................14
Research Instrument.....................14
Research Procedure........15
Gathering of Data.................
DEFINITION OF TERMS.15
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A..17
APPENDIX B..18
APPENDIX C19
APPENDIX D20
APPENDIX E21
APPENDIX F22
APPENDIX G23
APPENDIX H24
APPENDIX I..25
APPENDIX J..29
APPENDIX K.30
REFERENCES...32
Rationale
Simbulan (2007) stated that political dynasty is a succession of people from the same
family who plays a role in politics, and now one of the problems in the Philippine politics that
the government can't solve. It is because the people in the position are those who are involved in
these political dynasties. These people want to stay in their position because they want power for
personal gain.
Almost all citizens know that political dynasties are lurking in the government but still, they
continue to support them even though political dynasties are unconstitutional. They can't be
blamed because those candidates who have political dynasties use their influences and money to
dominate and manipulate the politics. Since this country doesn't distribute good quality of life to
its citizens, those who are in the position are greedy and maybe scared because they don't want to
experience a difficult life.
Based from the Article II, Section 26 of the 1987 Constitution, it says that The State
shall guarantee equal access to public service and prohibit political dynasty as may be defined by
law. Despite of this Anti-Political Dynasty Act implemented, our fellow citizens still continue to
support political dynasties. The citizens cannot be blamed for the existence of political dynasty,
because some of the political candidates use their money and influences to manipulate and
convince people to vote for them. Some also tend to hurt and threat other people, just for them to
win in elections.
Philippines faces a significant threat to the vibrancy of its political system. Political
dynasties have been well-established in Philippine politics, and dynastic politicians are returning
to the campaign trail to safeguard turf or to recapture old positions. According to Asian Institute
of Management that the problem is endemic in the Philippines 70 percent of members of
Philippine Congress are from political dynasties.
As of 2007, different cities in the Philippines are being ruled by about 250 political
dynasties. They have the superiority in the Philippine politics both national and local levels have
been there for at least three decades (Simbulan, 2007).
With the statement mentioned, the researchers came up to this study since the level of
political dynasty in the government is alarming and the researchers should study this because it is
them and their fellow citizens who will suffer if this continues. The study, as stated before, will
focus on the different causes and impacts towards the society and the government. They are
eager to get the results which they know would be helpful for the citizens to be more aware to its
side effects and also for the other lawmakers to see the views of the other people.
Theoretical Background
This study is anchored on "Iron Law of Oligarchy Theory" by Robert Michels (1911)
which claims that rule by an elite, or oligarchy, is inevitable as an "iron law" within any
democratic organization as part of the "tactical and technical necessities" of organization. The
concept of the theory is to explain why Political dynasty exist.
Robert Michels believed that the people in this group would become enthralled with their
elite positions and more and more inclined to make decisions that protect their power rather than
represent the will of the group they are supposed to serve. In effect Michels was saying that
bureaucracy and democracy do not mix. Despite any protestations and promises that they would
not become like all the rest, those placed in positions of responsibility and power often come to
believe that they too are indispensable, and more knowledgeable than those they serve (Michels,
2011).
Darcy K. Leach summarized Iron Law of Oligarchy as "Bureaucracy happens. If
bureaucracy happens, power rises. Power corrupts." There is a need to create a bureaucracy in
order to maintain its efficiency as it becomes largermany decisions have to be made daily that
cannot be made by large numbers of disorganized people. For the organization to function
effectively, centralization has to occur and power will end up in the hands of a few. Those few,
the oligarchy, will use all means necessary to preserve and further increase their power (Michels,
1911).
The "Iron Law of Oligarchy" states that all forms of organization, regardless of how
democratic they may be at the start, will eventually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies,
thus making true democracy practically and theoretically impossible, especially in large groups
and complex organizations. Gordon (1931) asserts that the iron law of oligarchy is just a new
name for the central elitist principle that trade union is infarct leadership by a few.
In the 1987 Philippine Constitution Article II, Section 26 states that "The State shall
guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as may
be defined by law." The 1987 Constitution grants any person who is qualified to run for public
service and prohibits political dynasties in the government. However, There is no enabling law
to implement the provision of the Constitution at present against political dynasties. There were a
number of senators who filed a bill related to Anti-Political Dynasty act of the Constitution
namely Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago, Senator Alfredo Lim, Senator Panfilo Lacson and Rep.
Teddy Casino. Unfortunately, even though bills have been filed since the 8th Congress to have a
law to stop the establishment of political dynasties, the Congress has failed to pass such a law.
Santiago (2014) said that the reason for this continuous failure is that all levels of government,
from municipal to national, are being controlled by politicians who are members of these
politically powerful and wealthy families. Since there is no enabling law to implement the
provision of the constitution against political dynasty, it is the moral obligation of every Filipino
citizen to abide the Constitutional mandate.
The continuing phenomenon of political dynasties today reflects the encompassing
influence of traditional politics. Recent studies reveal that since 1903 to present, dynastic
candidates have had about thirty percent greater chance of winning over non-traditional rivals.
It has become customary for citizens to base their decisions on personality-based campaigns
backed by familial or dynastic support. While an ideology is in place such dynasties perpetuate
and enjoy various advantages in traditional kinship networks, political machineries, wealth,
property, access to government sources, weak political party system, weak electoral system,
culture of powerlessness among the people, and warlordism. (Tuazon, 2012).
Due to their wealth and the capability to control the economy, they can exercise influence
which gives them chance to gain political power (Simbulan, 2007). The characterization of
political dynasty includes terms/concepts that require further definition. A spouse refers to the
legal and common-law wife or husband of the incumbent elective official. The term second civil
degree of consanguinity or affinity refers to the relatives of a person who may be the latters
brother or sister, whether of full or half-blood, direct ascendant or direct descendant, whether
legitimate, illegitimate or adopted, including their spouses. The term running for an elective
office is deemed to commence upon the filing of the certificate of candidacy by a candidate
with the COMELEC. Holding an elective office is deemed to commence from the moment the
public official takes his oath of office..Political dynasty is unconstitutional because under the
Philippine Constitution at Article II, Section 26, it is stated that The state shall guarantee equal
access to opportunities for public services, and prohibit political dynasty as may be defined by
law. (De Leon, 2008)
Based from the statement mentioned, political dynasty is considered a crime. However, it
still exists here in the Philippines because political dynasties have no definite definition in our
Constitution(Cruz, 2007). The constitution indirectly encourages political dynasties. A forcibly
retired official arranges for a family member, or a mistress to occupy his position for one term,
after which he is qualified to run again for office. The substitute is usually a puppet for the
retired family member. James Robinson (2013) said in their blog that Political dynasties in the
Philippines is off the chart compared to any other country in the world. 60% of congress-people
elected in 2007 had a previous relative who were also in congress. To give some sense of how
high this is, the analogous figure in the US was 7%. In roughly half of the 80 provinces of the
Philippines the governor is related to one of the congress-people.
Many bills and laws are passed to define political dynasty in order to prohibit building
political dynasties here in our country, but the very problem of these bills and laws are the
government officials who is indeed will pass these bills and laws are also the people who are
guilty of building such political dynasties here in our country (A. Donato, 2010).
Ravanilla (2012) finds evidence that political dynasties may use public funds to support
allies and their clan members. His analysis of the disbursement of the constituent development
fund (CDF) of legislatorsthe so-called pork barreltends to favor local patrons, particularly
mayoral partisan allies in their districts. Such a skewed allocation of resources could also
potentially weaken the chances to attain policy objectives such as povertyreduction, as argued by
Mendoza, et al. (2012).
David (2007) said that Political dynasty brings with its own implications. According to
Donato (2010), The presence of political dynasties in our government promotes graft and
corruption, because family members tend to overlook the mistakes of each other. This also leads
to nepotism. Building a strong modern political world is decidedly toward the formulation that
we can get not only from adjuncts of clans, churches or corporations . We found evidence
compatible with self-perpetuation in that, legislators with longer tenures are significantly more
likely to have relatives entering Congress after them. Holding legislative power for more than
one term is associated with a 40% increase in the likelihood that a politician will have a relative
entering Congress in the future. The fact that longer tenures predict dynastic permanence in
power is consistent with the idea that a longer hold on legislative power augments a dynasty s
posterior attainment of power.
One of the notable influences of political dynasties is a political "Carnegie Effect",

named after Andrew Carnegie. The "Carnegie Effect" is based on Carnegies decision to give all
his wealth to non-family members, where he argues that his son might have less incentive of
working hard if he were to be assured of his fathers wealth. This can also be attributed to
dynastic politicians. According to an empirical survey, dynastic politicians have a significant
advantage from the start of their career. They have a statistically higher probability to win
elections as compared to non-dynastic politicians. Dynastic politicians also have generally lower
educational attainment which is inversely related to their rank in their political dynasties. Also,
dynasties prevent new candidates from occupying new seats of power; leading to less new ideas
and platforms to work with.
Political dynasties also have extra incentive to develop their own jurisdictions. Based on
the notion of "Roving Bandits vs. Stationary Bandits", dynastic politicians are more likely to
pursue developments since they expect to be in office for longer. Political dynasties are also
responsible for the increase in womens political participation in politics. Female politicians
hailing from political dynasties can easily get into politics due to their connections. Political
dynasties have the advantage of continuity (Mendoza, 2013).
Tuazon (2012) explained that the rampant political dynasty building today is a way of
"self-preservation and expansion, which means for a continuing rule of political dynasties."
Personal gain could also be a motivation for political dynasty to continue in this modern era. A
seat in the government would give power and control over many things, and could use the power
or influence to acquire for personal gain.
The concept of governance by representation has been smudged. No longer is it true that
the government is of the people, for the people, and by the people. It is now replace by
government of them, for them, and by them. The people in the government are no longer for
public service, but for personal gains.
With all the related concepts and studies presented above, the researchers are motivated
to study on the implications of Political Dynasty towards governance and to determine what
motivates political leaders to establish political dynasty.
9
Iron Law of Oligarchy
Theory
The 1987 Philippine

Constitution
Robert Michels
Article II, Section 26
(1911)
EFFECTS
Oligarchy
Power
corrupts
POLITICAL DYNASTY
Implications
Motivations
Progress and Development
Figure 1. Theoretical-Conceptual Framework of the Study
10
Statement of the Problem

This study aims to determine the causes and effects of political dynasty, its impact in
governance towards the people, moreover to elucidate the general public what has been perceive
through this timely related political issue.
This study further seeks to answer the following question:
1. What motivates political leaders to establish political dynasty?
2. How does political dynasty affect the system of government and the process in society?
3. Is there any successive progress and uninterrupted development in the place where political
dynasty reigns?
Statement of the Hypothesis

Theres no significant difference between the responses of the different groups of
respondents regarding implication of political dynasty towards governance in Inabanga Bohol.
Significance of the Study

The study of political dynasty towards governance in Inabanga will be of significance to
the following:
Political Science Students. This study is useful for reference, especially to the Political
Science students and to those students who are in the field of studying politics, it may serve as
11
their guide or tool in studying the behaviour of political dynasty for future researches and further
improvisation.
Elective Public Officials. The research study will serve as a basis to improve the
delivery of basic services, and implement programs and projects for the satisfactory effect to the
people.
Residents. This is important, especially to those who are residing in the place where
political dynasty occur, through this research they will notice the effects of political dynasty and
that the residents can choose the right candidate to be voted.
Future Researchers. This study will be applied in their future research of political
dynasty and governance in measuring the perceive issue.
Scope and Limitation

This study is conducted in a third income class municipality, in the town of Inabanga,
Bohol,consisting 50 Barangays.(Bohol.gov.ph) The study is limited only to this town and to the
people who reside therein. The study focuses on political dynasty in relation to governance and
its effect in society. Further, the study takes base on key informant interview for the Local
Government Unit and Focus Group Discussion for the Non-Governmental Organization and
Survey Questionnaire. It assumes that respondents will answer with honesty and without
excessive information entails.
12
Research Methodology
Research Design
This study isboth qualitativeand quantitative research method in gathering the data. The
qualitative research makes use of key informant interview, focus group discussion, and self-made
survey questionnaire.In the gathering of data, the researchers conduct the key informant
interview to the member(s) of the Sangguniang Bayan- the secretary, two (2) board members of
the same political party, two (2) board members not coming from the same political party and
two (2) Punong barangay, the key informant interview is important because it will provide new
collection of information.The focus group discussion will assess the non-governmental
organization (NGO) which includes the management sectors, the farmers and the professional
workers who are competent in giving knowledge or information. For quantitative, the study uses
descriptive research method. It makes use of quantitative data acquired through a survey
questionnaire. The survey questionnaire will assess the level of effectiveness and of governance
in a political dynasty. The questions are designed through a rating - scale namely, strongly agree,
agree, disagree, and strongly disagree. In the study, the researchers will first give a letter of
invitation for an interview, specifying the day, time, place and availability of the key informant
and the participants of the study.
To reiterate, the researchers make use of qualitative and quantitative method to see
clearly the perceive performance of the incumbent officials of Inabanga, Bohol, which mirrors
their capacity to lead. The study is suitable for opinions based on the study, as the political
13
dynasty is subjective through their impression and its means of governance.The researchers, after
results, it will be tabulated and calculated for the success of study.
Research Environment
The Municipality of Inabanga is chosen by the researchers as the most suitable for
research environment. The municipality of Inabanga is a 3rd income class, in the 2nd district of
Bohol with 50 barangays estimating the land area of 131.66 sq. kms. , in 2015 census, it has a
population of 45, 880 and has a registered voters of 25, 979 during 2016 election, the town is
known for its agricultural products and rich environment.The town is also known for hand-made
raffia, like bags and basket, also engaged in trading, fishing, farming and nipa thatch-making.
(Bohol.gov.ph)
Figure 1. Map of Bohol
14
Research Respondents
The research participants of this study is classified through different types. For the
qualitative approach, the researchers purposively select the key informant from the Local
Government Unit (LGU) - The secretary, the two board members of the same political party, the
two (2) members not coming from the same political party and the two (2) Punong barangay. For
the Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) - the researchers use focus group discussion method
that includes the management sector, farmers organization and professional workers that are
selected to support information of the study. For quantitative, there is a total registered voters of
N=25, 979 but the researchers would choose a sample of n=100 who are capable in answering
the survey questionnaire. The key informant and the focus group are given guide questions
Research Instrument
The researchers apply both qualitative and quantitative data approach. The study makes
use of key informant interview, focus group discussion and survey questionnaire method to
gather data. The researcher will utilize a self-made questionnaire, for qualitative it uses KII, and
FGD in gathering data. And for the quantitative, it usesself-made survey questionnaire, all
questions are based on participation and performance, basic services and facilities for a
municipality.Their different ideas and contribution of knowledge will be a big help to realize the
research study.
15
Research Procedures
Gathering Data. The researchers ask authority from the Chairman of Social Sciences,
especially the Dean of College of Arts and Sciences prior to the dissemination of questionnaire.
Upon approval the researchers proceed with the data gathering.
The researchers make a written letter or permission enclose with particular day and time
for the agreement and approval of schedule to the informants, they are from Local Government
Unit (LGU), Non-Governmental Organization (NGO). The researchers also ask permission to the
Municipal Mayor through a formal letter, before conducting the survey. All the gather data are
with consent from the informants for validity and credibility of the study.
Definition of Terms
Political Dynasty.It is a succession of members of the same family engaging political
matter and running the public office, it can be inherited from one generation to the next.
Registered Residents.They are those persons able to vote and qualify to engage public
matters and long have been residing the place.
Elective Public Official. They are appointed or elected to assume or exercise the
governmental function, it is conferred by the constitution or by-laws of an organization.
Governance. This is primarily employed by the public official/officer, by the way of
controlling and supervising the place he/she governs.
Key Informant.A person who gives information or knowledge to the researcher.
Focus Group. A certain group gathered together for discussion.
16
APPENDIX
17
APPENDIX A
COMMUNICATION
Date
Recipient
Subject
28 July 2016
Secretary- LGU
Permission to conduct interview
28 July 2016
Board Members- Admin. Party
28 July 2016
Board Members- Admin. Party
28 July 2016
Board Members- Oppo. Party
28 July 2016
Board Members- Oppo. Party
3 August 2016
Punong Barangay- Tungod
3 August 2016
Punong Barangay- Tambo-oc
3 August 2016
Head Management Sector
Coordination to conduct FGD
4 August 2016
Head of Professional workers
4 August 2016
Head of Farmers Association
APPENDIX B
LETTERS- PERMISSION TO CONDUCT KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW
24 July 2016
SECRETARY OF SANGGUNIANG BAYAN
18
Local Government Unit

Inabanga, Bohol
Subject:
Conduct of Key Informant Interview
______________________________________________________________________________
Sir/Madame: greetings in Gods most Merciful
Good day, the Political Science Student of Holy Name University are doing a research study
titled The Implication of Political Dynasty Towards Governance in Inabanga, This research
study is required by our subject English 19- Research Paper. For the completion of the study, the
researchers would like to invite you as the key informant of this study.
In this matter, may we request your full support by giving us permission to conduct interview
with you. The content of interview shall cover opinion about perception of political dynasty in
relation to governance.
For the communication of the researchers you are welcome to contact us (0946-811-7212), we
also assure that all the information gather will be treated with utmost care.
Thank you and God bless!

Sincerely yours,
JUNBERT E. GUDES
Endorse by:
GERARD JAPOS
Prof.Zaluaga
Subject Teacher
APPENDIX C
24 July 2016
MEMBER(S) OF SANGGUNIANG BAYAN
19
Local Government Unit

Inabanga, Bohol
Subject:
______________________________________________________________________________

Sincerely yours,
JUNBERT E. GUDES
Endorse by:
GERARD JAPOS
Prof.Zaluaga
Subject Teacher
APPENDIX D
24 July 2016
Hon. Barangay Chairman
20
Barangay Tungod
Inabanga, Bohol
Subject:
______________________________________________________________________________

Sincerely yours,
JUNBERT E. GUDES
Endorse by:
GERARD JAPOS
Prof.Zaluaga
Subject Teacher
APPENDIX E
24 July 2016
Hon. Barangay Chairman
21
Barangay Tambo-oc
Inabanga, Bohol
Subject:
______________________________________________________________________________

Sincerely yours,
JUNBERT E. GUDES
Endorse by:
GERARD JAPOS
Prof.Zaluaga
Subject Teacher
APPENDIX F
24 July 2016
JOSE FRANCISCO A. NEGRO
22
Head of Farmers Association

Non-Governmental Organization
Inabanga, Bohol
Subject:
______________________________________________________________________________

Sincerely yours,
JUNBERT E. GUDES
Endorse by:
GERARD JAPOS
Prof.Zaluaga
Subject Teacher
APPENDIX G
24 July 2016
ATTY. JILLBERT G. ANUNCIADO
23
Head of Professional Workers Organization

Inabanga, Bohol
Subject:
______________________________________________________________________________

Sincerely yours,
JUNBERT E. GUDES
Endorse by:
GERARD JAPOS
Prof.Zaluaga
Subject Teacher
APPENDIX H
24 July 2016
MGR. JUNDIE Q. FLOORES
24
Head of Management Sector

Inabanga, Bohol
Subject:
______________________________________________________________________________

Sincerely yours,
JUNBERT E. GUDES
Endorse by:
GERARD JAPOS
Prof.Zaluaga
Subject Teacher
APPENDIX I
Survey Questionnaire
25
This questionnaire is distributed in order to gather information regarding your general

understanding(insights) on how the elective official maintain their position in the government,
and how the official revitalize the place in terms of social services, and governmental projects
.
Through your kind participation, the study will be able to make possible suggestions and
recommendations regarding to what is necessary to add on. With this, thank you so much, for
without your support and cooperation this study will not be possible to the researchers.
Thank you so much for your cooperation.
Part I. Profile of the Respondent

a.
Age _____
b.
Gender: Male ( )
c.
Status:
Single ( )
d.
Religion
_____________________
e.
Occupation:
f.
Position _________________________
Female ( )
Private ( )
Part II. Deliberation of Basic Services
Married ( )
Public ( )
26
Kindly encircle the number of your choice in answering this part of the questionnaire using this
guide.
4 Strongly Agree
3 Agree
2 Disagree
1- Strongly disagree
The questions enumerated below are based on basic services and facilities for a municipal, this
shows how progressive your place is, in terms of governmental service. Please answer the
questions as honestly as possible.
Control and review of the DENR, implementation of community-based forestry projects which
include integrated social forestry programs and similar projects:
1. Encouraging environmental protection.
2. I heard certain resolution or ordinances about this.
3. I remember some of these program.
4. Head of DENR is knowledgeable and competent.
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Health services which include the implementation of programs and projects on primary health
care, maternal and child care, and communicable and non-communicable disease control
services;
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that the delivery is ever effective.

I have availed the health services.
I am not hesitant to ask help.
The health services are everywhere available.
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Social welfare services which include programs and projects on child and youth welfare, family
and community welfare, women's welfare, welfare of the elderly and disabled persons:
1.
2.
3.
4.
I am one of the recipient of social services.

The always promote social welfare services.
I can see successive programs like this.
I often participate in social welfare services.
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Municipal buildings, cultural centers, public parks including freedom parks, playgrounds, and
sports facilities and equipment, and other similar
facilities
1. We have complete facilities like this.
27
2. The LGU has provided more than enough.

3. We only have some, but properly manage.
4. Facilities are well equip.
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
Extension and on-site research services and facilities related to agriculture and fishery activities
which include dispersal of livestock and poultry, fingerlings, and other seeding materials for
aquaculture
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have availed this one once.

I receive this one commonly.
I do not see the government doing this.
I believe that the government has provided enough.
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Tourism facilities and other tourist attractions, including the acquisition of equipment, regulation
and supervision of business concessions, and security services for such facilities:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The government is promoting tourism facilities.

Tourist attractions are always clean and healthy.
Accessible and conveniently located.
Is properly manage.
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Solid waste disposal system or environmental management system and services or facilities
related to general hygiene and sanitation:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The government is responsive.

I can see that funds are adequate and enough
The government has provided garbage truck for collection.
The program is implemented to all barangays.
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
28
APPENDIX J
KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW
(LGUs- Secretary, Board Members and Punong Barangay)
Name: ____________________________________
Gender: _____________________
Name of Organization: ______________________
Age: ________________________
Position: _________________________
Dear respondents,
titled THE IMPLICATION OF POLITICAL DYNASTY TOWARDS
GOVERNANCE IN INABANGA, BOHOL. Your answers will be used as

primary data in the study undertaken by the researchers. The researchers also
assure that all the information gather will be treated with utmost care.
29
Thank you.
Creation of Political Dynasty, Assessment of LGU in Development and Production.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
When they do begin entering politics?

How long they are in government?
How many members are in the government?
What offices do they occupy or work?
In their entire supervision, are you convince and satisfy with their way of governing the
place and the people?
6. What is your own opinion about their extended services towards growth and
development?
7. As individual in this town, are you fully aware with governmental projects, activities or
programs for development?
8. What can you say about the governance of the incumbent officials?
9. Have you once a beneficiary of their certain projects?
10. What do you like or dislike to their way of governance?
11. What specific projects that the local government unit has done peculiar?
APPENDIX K
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION
(NGOs - Management Sector, Farmers Organization and Professionals Workers)
Name: ____________________________________
Gender: _____________________
Name of Organization: ______________________
Age: ________________________
Position: _________________________
Dear respondents,
titledTHE IMPLICATION OF POLITICAL DYNASTY TOWARDS
GOVERNANCE IN INABANGA, BOHOL. Your answers will be used as

primary data in the study undertaken by the researchers. The researchers also
assure that all the information gather will be treated with utmost care.
Thank you.
30
1. What certain governmental project that you can consider helpful toyou organization?
2. Have you receive assistance coming from LGU and from private sectors, if yes, what are
those assistance?
3. Did the LGU become an active partner in promoting the establishment and supporting
your projects/programs, if yes, what are those instances?
4. In your own inferences, how is the governmental intervention with regards to the nongovernmental organization, is it completely corresponded?
5. What encounter that the LGU declines as partner in promoting and enhancing the
economic and social well-being of the people?
6. Are you fully aware about Republic Act No. 7160 Chapter 4- relation with peoples and
nongovernmental organizations?
7. What incline you to initiate an organization like this?
8. If you will accept members of this organization what will be the qualification?
9. What common problems that the organization always encounter?
10. What sort of programs done to solve the problem?
11. Where can you get money or assistance to use for organizational purposes?
12. How important to socialize into the institution, government, or other organization?
13. In what instances that disables the organization to operate properly?
31
References:
Borla, M. (2013). Political Dynasty. Retrieved from
https://www.scribd.com/doc/152194745/Political-Dynasty
Calabrese, J. (2007, December 1). Iran's War on Drugs: Holding the Line? Retrieved from
http://www.mei.edu/content/irans-war-drugs-holding-line
Chie, Q. T., & Tam, C. L. (2015). Drug Abuse, Relapse, and Prevention Education in Malaysia:
Perspective of University Students Through a Mixed Methods Approach. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4421936/
Collins, J., & Cox, M. (2014, June 1). War on drugs going nowhere. Retrieved from
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2014/08/23/lifestyle/dealing-addiction-japans-drugproblem/
32
The Guardian. (2016, April 16). As Colombias leader, I know we must rethink the drugs war.
Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/16/war-drugscolombia-un-new-approach
Habito, C. (2015). Do dynasties deter development? Retrieved from
http://opinion.inquirer.net/87517/do-dynasties-deter-development
Mendoza, R. (2013). POLITICAL DYNASTIES AND POVERTY: EVIDENCE FROM THE
PHILIPPINES. Retrieved from
http://www.nscb.gov.ph/ncs/12thncs/papers/INVITED/IPS-11%20Governance
%20Statistics/IPS-11_1%20Political%20Dynasties%20and%20Poverty_Evidence
%20from%20the%20Philippines.pdf
A Peoples War: Chinas Struggle to Contain its Illicit Drug Problem. (2009, September 14).
Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/A-Peoples-Warfinal.pdf
Quah, S. (2016, March 15). Singapore's approach to combating drugs more effective: Study.
Retrieved from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-s-approachto/2602578.html
Tolentino, J. (2013). A Political Dynasty. Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/27990840/POLITICAL_DYNASTY

The Implication of Political Dynasty Towards Governance in Inabanga, Bohol

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Implication of Political Dynasty Towards Governance in Inabanga, Bohol

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE IMPLICATION OF POLITICAL DYNASTY TOWARDS

GOVERNANCE IN INABANGA, BOHOL

CHAPTER I- THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

One of the notable influences of political dynasties is a political "Carnegie Effect",

The 1987 Philippine

Progress and Development

Figure 1. Theoretical-Conceptual Framework of the Study

Statement of the Problem

Statement of the Hypothesis

Significance of the Study

Scope and Limitation

Figure 1. Map of Bohol

Permission to conduct interview

Board Members- Admin. Party

Permission to conduct interview

Board Members- Admin. Party

Permission to conduct interview

Board Members- Oppo. Party

Permission to conduct interview

Board Members- Oppo. Party

Permission to conduct interview

Punong Barangay- Tungod

Permission to conduct interview

Punong Barangay- Tambo-oc

Permission to conduct interview

Head Management Sector

Coordination to conduct FGD

Head of Professional workers

Coordination to conduct FGD

Head of Farmers Association

Coordination to conduct FGD

LETTERS- PERMISSION TO CONDUCT KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW

Local Government Unit

Conduct of Key Informant Interview

Thank you and God bless!

LETTERS- PERMISSION TO CONDUCT KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW

Local Government Unit

Conduct of Key Informant Interview

Thank you and God bless!

LETTERS- PERMISSION TO CONDUCT KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW

Conduct of Key Informant Interview

Thank you and God bless!

LETTERS- PERMISSION TO CONDUCT KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW

Conduct of Key Informant Interview

Thank you and God bless!

LETTERS- PERMISSION TO CONDUCT KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW

Head of Farmers Association

Conduct of Key Informant Interview

Thank you and God bless!

LETTERS- PERMISSION TO CONDUCT KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW

Head of Professional Workers Organization

Conduct of Key Informant Interview

Thank you and God bless!

LETTERS- PERMISSION TO CONDUCT KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW

Head of Management Sector

Conduct of Key Informant Interview

Thank you and God bless!

This questionnaire is distributed in order to gather information regarding your general

Part I. Profile of the Respondent

Part II. Deliberation of Basic Services

I believe that the delivery is ever effective.

I am one of the recipient of social services.

2. The LGU has provided more than enough.