Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper Kakodiki EngStruct
Paper Kakodiki EngStruct
Engineering Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/engstruct
University of Vigo, School of Industrial Engineering, Department of Engineering Materials, Applied Mechanics and Construction, ES-36208 Vigo, Spain
University of KwaZulu-Natal, Department of Civil Engineering, South Africa
c
Technical University of Crete, School of Production Engineering and Management, Institute of Computational Mechanics and Optimization, GR-73100 Chania, Greece
d
Technical University of Crete, School of Architecture, Applied Mechanics Laboratory, GR-73100 Chania, Greece
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 26 March 2016
Revised 3 August 2016
Accepted 30 August 2016
Available online 15 September 2016
Keywords:
Masonry arch bridges
Inverse analysis
Optimization
Genetic algorithm
Unilateral contact-friction
a b s t r a c t
In this paper a novel approach for the investigation of pathological problems in masonry arch bridges
using inverse analysis procedures is proposed. A real case study located in Kakodiki village on the island
of Crete (Greece) is considered for the application of the proposed computational scheme. The method
uses the damaged condition of the bridge as starting point and seeks the potential load cases that led
to its development. The damage identification is transformed into a parameter identification problem
which is studied by comparing numerical predictions and existing damage pattern. A global optimization
approach by means of a genetic algorithm is adopted within the inverse problem, aiming at adjusting the
parameters of the mechanical model of the structure so that an error function that measures the differences between the real and the numerically predicted damage pattern is minimized. The outcome of the
methodology might provide a valuable information regarding to the planning of maintenance actions as
well as to the design of retrofitting measures.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Masonry arch bridges are historic and traditional civil engineering constructions with an important presence in many countries
around the world. Many of these infrastructures still play an
important role in the railway and road networks [1], while others
have been gradually relegated by the most modern steel and concrete structures. In a context where the preservation of cultural
heritage is a major concern of the modern societies, masonry
bridges also represent an invaluable cultural legacy. Built according to the knowledge and to the means of the time, they personify
the signs and memories of our past generations [2].
Pathological conditions may arise in masonry bridges as a consequence of the diverse and intense loading scenarios which
appear throughout their service life. Usually, small or large deformations and damage remain after these phenomena [3].
Approaches based on the formulation of an inverse analysis problem might contribute to the successful identification of the loading
scenarios that led the structure to the current damaged condition.
In this framework, the initial consideration would be the present
damaged state of the bridge, whilst the final state under investiga Corresponding author.
E-mail address: belenriveiro@uvigo.es (B. Riveiro).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.060
0141-0296/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
389
Fig. 1. Overall image of Kakodiki bridge, shown from the downstream side [4].
Fig. 2. Pattern of three hinges developed in the arch, shown from the upstream
side [4].
390
uw K 1 wp
minw Euw
Fig. 5. Damage in the abutment below hinge 3 (right abutment), shown from the
upstream side [4].
1
uw u0 T Auw u0
2
Fig. 6. Damage in the abutment below hinge 1 (left abutment), shown from the
upstream side [4].
Kwu p
with the usual notation for the stiffness matrix K, the displacement
vector u 2 Rn , with n degrees of freedom, and the loading vector p.
391
Fig. 7. Geometry of the current damaged state of the structure (in meters).
392
Table 1
Mechanical properties adopted in the non-linear finite element models of the bridge.
Model
Density masonry
(kg/m3)
Density infill
(kg/m3)
Youngs modulus
masonry (GPa)
Youngs modulus
infill (GPa)
Poissons
ratio
Cohesion
(kPa)
Friction
angle ()
Model 1
Model 2
2000
2000
1800
5
5
0.5
0.2
0.2
30
30
the next section, when the details of the inverse problem will be
exposed.
4.3. Model 2: arch-infill interaction effects
In a second modeling strategy, to get a better insight into the
real mechanical behavior of the bridge, a non-linear finite element
model with the explicit representation of the fill material was
considered.
For the discretization of the arch, the same modeling approach
previously discussed was assumed, that is, a discrete finite element
approach with contact-friction interfaces. Moreover, the unilateral
contact-friction problem was extended to also model the arch-fill
interaction effects at the stones-infill boundary. A zero tensile
strength and a friction coefficient equal to 0.60 were respectively
used to model the normal and transversal behavior of the interfaces. The constraints at the interfaces were imposed by means
of a penalty formulation.
Stone blocks were modeled according to a linear elastic behavior with the same material properties indicated in the previous section. The infill was modeled according to the classical MohrCoulomb yield criterion. The values of the mechanical properties
assumed to model the fill material needs special attention. These
material data are usually unknown, or if available they are determined with some degree of uncertainty. In this study, these data
were not available. Consequently, the mechanical properties of
both the masonry and the infill were established based on a review
of the existing literature [2022], taking into account the type of
construction and the on-site inspections. Accordingly, the mechanical properties which were assumed in the non-linear finite element models of the bridge are shown in Table 1. Moreover, the
fixed values of the material parameters were assumed in the optimization process. The reason behind this assumption was to focus
the problem in the investigation of finding the theoretical initial
geometry of the bridge together with the most likely scenarios of
damage loading, as well as to reduce the search space, size and
complexity of the problem when a reduced number of optimization parameters are considered.
Both the arch and infill were discretized using two-dimensional
elements under the assumption of a plane strain state. The out-ofplane width of the bridge was the same as previously mentioned;
3.00 m. Meshing of the arch voussoirs was carried out considering
quadrilateral, eight-node elements with two translational degrees
of freedom per node, and with a maximum global size of 0.30 m
for the length of each finite element. For the infill discretization,
triangular six-node elements with two translational degrees of
freedom per node, and with a maximum global size for the length
of each finite element about 40% smaller with respect to the mesh
of the arch, were used. The size mesh was selected based on
obtaining a sufficient precision in the simulations, while the computational effort remains enclosed at reasonable times. Parametric
investigations were performed and in agreement the indicated values were chosen.
As for the loads, the same considerations discussed above for
the model without fill material were replicated here. With respect
to the boundary conditions, at the bottom part of the arch and the
infill, fixed conditions were imposed. On both sides of the infill,
only the longitudinal movements were restricted.
393
Fig. 8. Graphical description of the optimization variables. The present geometry is depicted in black, and in red a possible solution to the optimization problem. (For
interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Table 2
Lower and upper bounds considered for the variables of the inverse problem.
Parameter
Designation
a
b
c
d
e, g
f
394
Fig. 9. Set of points in the intrados of the arch used in the simulations.
1
For interpretation of color in Fig. 9, the reader is referred to the web version of
this article.
395
n
1X
^ j y j 2
y
n j1
!1=2
4
396
Table 3
Values of the identified parameters for Model 1.
Run
a (m)
b (m)
c (m)
d (m)
e (m)
f (m)
g (m)
1
2
3
0.041
0.050
0.048
0.043
0.050
0.042
0.087
0.094
0.083
0.088
0.072
0.082
3.46
3.44
3.46
4.93
4.91
4.93
3.26
3.26
3.25
Fig. 12. Objective function value versus population generation number (Model 1).
the (y) coordinates along the intrados of the arch with respect to
the real ones are presented. Note that in this figure, the coordinates
of the joints along the (x) direction are normalized to values in the
interval [0, 1], in agreement with the exposed in Section 5.2.
397
Fig. 13. Damaged shape of the bridge (Model 1) from the parameters estimated in the second optimization run.
Fig. 15. Objective function value versus population generation number (Model 2).
Fig. 14. Deviation between the (y) coordinates of the joints along the span of the
arch (Model 1).
material data, have been used for the sensitivity analysis. From
the results summarized in Tables 5 and 6, one clearly recognizes
that the sensitivities of the last group of parameters are much
lower than the sensitivities of the first group. Therefore, the choice
of important parameters is fully justified.
7.4. Discussion
Table 4
Values of the identified parameters for Model 2.
Run
a (m)
b (m)
c (m)
d (m)
e (m)
f (m)
g (m)
1
2
3
0.035
0.031
0.029
0.015
0.030
0.013
0.046
0.041
0.052
0.054
0.038
0.031
3.49
3.49
3.49
4.95
4.94
4.93
3.27
3.28
3.28
398
Fig. 16. Damaged shape of the bridge (Model 2) from the parameters estimated in the first optimization run.
Fig. 17. Theoretical initial geometry of the bridge against the actual geometry.
Fig. 18. Visual fit between the intrados guideline after simulation and the real
measured data.
Fig. 19. Deviation between the (y) coordinates of the joints along the span of the
arch (Model 2).
399
1
2
0.0688
0.1312
0.0654
0.1300
0.0102
0.0206
0.0379
0.0423
0.0451
0.0540
0.0153
0.0091
0.0248
0.0182
Table 6
Sensitivity analysis: material parameters.
Model
Cohesion
Friction angle
1
2
1.0217e10
1,2787e11
3,1537e09
2,5842e05
3,1134e06
400
For the case study of Kakodiki bridge, despite the many uncertainties of the problem, as well as the fact that further research is
needed regarding the impact of infill material properties, the
results obtained here could be deemed satisfactory.
The damage pattern is reproduced with reasonable accuracy
even with the consideration of the appraisal of the hinges positions. The dimensions of the theoretical initial geometry of the arch
are in agreement with the a priori expected values, and the
predicted loading scenarios, although exhibiting relatively high
values, also seem to be consistent with the poor condition of the
abutments and the overall damaged state of the bridge.
8. Conclusions
In this paper, a novel methodology based on inverse modeling
was proposed to investigate the causes that led a masonry bridge
to a certain pathological condition. A real case study located in
Kakodiki village on the island of Crete (Greece) was considered
for the application of the proposed computational scheme. The
bridge presents an important damaged condition, with three main
cracks having developed in the body of the arch. Thus, both the initial undamaged geometry of the structure as well as the possible
load cases that cause this damage are under investigation.
The problem can be formulated as a parameter identification
problem and solved by adopting an iterative optimization procedure. Different loading scenarios and undamaged configurations
of the bridge are evaluated at each step until a satisfactory convergence between the real damaged condition and the numerically
predicted one is obtained. Through this process, a completely
parameterized numerical model, able to accommodate a new
geometry and loading conditions at each step of the iterative procedure, is needed. In this study, two non-linear finite element models, based on the principles of the non-smooth mechanics were
adopted to model the mechanical performance of Kakodiki bridge.
In the first model, only the arch was considered as being relevant
in the structural response of the bridge, and a two-dimensional
discrete finite element approach with contact-friction interfaces
was adopted. In the second model, fill material was added to
account for arch-infill interaction effects, and an elastoplastic
material law was adopted to represent its behavior.
To perform the comparison, accurate geometric data about the
current deformed shape of the arch are needed. In this study, the
coordinates of the joints between the voussoirs were used as reference targets for the inverse analysis.
The hypothesis about the likely theoretical initial geometry of
the bridge as well as potential damage loading scenarios were
based on the field examinations of the structure. As such, the arch
was idealized with a pointed profile and the movements at the
base of both abutments were selected as the optimization parameters that most influence the development of the damaged condition of the bridge. In view of the arising complex topology of the
error function, a genetic algorithm was chosen to perform the optimization analysis. Three different optimization runs considering
different initial populations were carried out in each model to
assess the reliability of the parameter identification and the
robustness of the algorithm. The results showed that the simplified
choice of a numerical model neglecting the explicit representation
of the fill material does not provide accurate results. The damage
pattern was not successfully reproduced, the theoretical initial
geometry of the bridge was underestimated and the load cases
were overestimated. For the model including the arch-infill interaction effects, satisfactory results were received if we take into
account the complexity of the problem and the level of the uncertainties present. The damage pattern was reproduced with reasonable accuracy, even with the consideration of the appraisal in the
hinges positions. The identified parameters show negligible variations regarding the geometric dimensions of the arch and acceptable ones for the predicted scenarios of the foundation
settlements. Overall, the dimensions of the theoretical initial
geometry of the arch seem to be in accordance with the a priori
expected values and the predicted loading scenarios, although
exhibiting relatively high values, also seem to be consistent with
the poor condition of the abutments and the overall damaged state
of the bridge. Thus, we can state that the outcome of the proposed
methodology might be of great interest for providing valuable
information regarding the planning of maintenance actions, as well
as to the selection of optimal remedial measures (strengthening).
Further studies could contemplate validation in additional case
studies, as well as exploring surrogate-based optimization strategies to reduce the computational effort. Finally, and for the case
study of Kakodiki bridge, the necessity of immediately commencing restoration works in order to prevent its collapse is indicated.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the help of several people from the Municipality of Kandanos who helped them to gather
material from the Kakodiki bridge, namely former Mayor Mr. Eftychios Daskalakis, Mr. Eftychios Korkidakis, Mr. Kostis Petrakis and
Deputy Mayor Mrs Stella Alfieri.
This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry
of Economy and Competitiveness through the project HERMESS3D: Healthy and Efficient Routes in Massive Open-Data based
Smart Cities (Ref.: TIN2013-46801-C4-4-R).
References
[1] Orbn Z, Gutermann M. Assessment of masonry arch railway bridges using
non-destructive in-situ testing methods. Eng Struct 2009;31:228798. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.04.008.
[2] UNESCO. Mehmed Paa Sokolovic Bridge in Viegrad. Retrieved from <http://
whc.unesco.org/en/list/1260> [accessed 29.07.16].
[3] Ural A, Oru S
, Doangn A, Tuluk I. Turkish historical arch bridges and their
deteriorations and failures. Eng Fail Anal 2008;15:4353. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.01.006.
[4] Stavroulaki ME, Drosopoulos GA, Stavroulakis GE. Unilateral analysis and
damage identification in masonry structures. In: Proc 13th int conf civil, struct
environ eng comput; 2011.
[5] Schlegel R, Will J. Sensitivity analysis and parameter identification on
historical masonry arch bridges. In: Proceedings of the 5th international
conference on arch bridges (ARCH 07), Madeira, Portugal.
[6] Riveiro B, Caamao JC, Arias P, Sanz E. Photogrammetric 3D modelling and
mechanical analysis of masonry arches: an approach based on a discontinuous
model of voussoirs. Autom Constr 2011;20:3808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
autcon.2010.11.008.
[7] Riveiro B, Morer P, Arias P, De Arteaga I. Terrestrial laser scanning and limit
analysis of masonry arch bridges. Constr Build Mater 2011;25:172635. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.094.
[8] Oliveira DV, Loureno PB, Lemos C. Geometric issues and ultimate load
capacity of masonry arch bridges from the northwest Iberian Peninsula. Eng
Struct 2010;32:395565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.09.006.
[9] Brencich A, Morbiducci R. Masonry arches: historical rules and modern
mechanics. Int J Arch Herit 2007;1:16589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
15583050701312926.
[10] Drosopoulos GA, Stavroulakis GE, Massalas CV. Limit analysis of a single span
masonry bridge with unilateral frictional contact interfaces. Eng Struct
2006;28:186473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.016.
[11] Region of Crete. Portal created under GRISI PLUS (Geomatics Rural Information
Society Initiative PLUS). Retrieved from <http://www.cretegis.gr/site/?p=
1202> [accessed 29.07.16].
[12] Stavroulakis GE. Inverse and crack identification problems in engineering
mechanics, vol. 46. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
[13] Hiriart-Urruty J-B, Lemarchal C. Convex analysis and minimization
algorithms I: fundamentals, vol. 305. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
[14] Chavent G. Nonlinear least squares for inverse problems: theoretical
foundations and step-by-step guide for applications. Springer Science &
Business Media; 2010.
[15] Snieder R. The role of nonlinearity in inverse problems. Inverse Probl
1998;14:387404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/14/3/003.
[16] Borwein JM. Maximum entropy and feasibility methods for convex and
nonconvex inverse problems. Optimization 2012;61:133.
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
401
Comput
Struct
2006;84:197789.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.compstruc.2006.08.009.
Cavicchi A, Gambarotta L. Two-dimensional finite element upper bound limit
analysis of masonry bridges. Comput Struct 2006;84:231628. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.048.
Heyman J. The masonry arch. England: Ellis Horwood Series in Engineering
Science; 1982.
Drosopoulos GA, Stavroulakis GE, Massalas CV. Influence of the geometry and
the abutments movement on the collapse of stone arch bridges. Constr Build
Mater 2008;22:20010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.001.
ABAQUS: version 6.12. Providence, RI, Dassault Systmes Simulia; 2012.
MATLAB: release R2015b. Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.; 2015.