ANNEX I

Where * License cross-tabulation

$Where*License Crosstabulation
License
Management
Wherea

Friends

Count
% of Total

Google

Count
% of Total

MARINA

Count
% of Total

Social_media

Count
% of Total

W_Others

Count
% of Total

Total

Count
% of Total

Percentages and totals are based on responses.

a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

Operational

Ratings

Total

21

26

10.0%

52.5%

2.5%

65.0%

2.5%

10.0%

.0%

12.5%

.0%

2.5%

.0%

2.5%

.0%

12.5%

2.5%

15.0%

2.5%

2.5%

.0%

5.0%

32

40

15.0%

80.0%

5.0%

100.0%

ANNEX II
Where * Training cross-tabulation
$Where*Training Crosstabulation
Training
Deck
Wherea

Friends

Count
% of Total

Google

26

30.0%

20.0%

15.0%

65.0%

7.5%

2.5%

2.5%

12.5%

2.5%

.0%

.0%

2.5%

10.0%

5.0%

.0%

15.0%

2.5%

2.5%

.0%

5.0%

21

12

40

52.5%

30.0%

17.5%

100.0%

Count

Count

Count
% of Total

W_Others

Count
% of Total

Total

Count
% of Total

Percentages and totals are based on responses.

a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

Total

% of Total
Social_media

Medical

12

% of Total
MARINA

Engine

ANNEX III
Reason * License cross-tabulation

$Reason*License Crosstabulation
License
Management
Reasona

Location

Count
% of Total

Price

Count
% of Total

Facilities

Count
% of Total

Recommend

Count
% of Total

Availability

Count
% of Total

R_others

Count
% of Total

Total

Count
% of Total

Percentages and totals are based on responses.

a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

Operational

Ratings

Total

21

27

6.2%

32.8%

3.1%

42.2%

14

14

.0%

21.9%

.0%

21.9%

14

14

.0%

21.9%

.0%

21.9%

3.1%

4.7%

.0%

7.8%

1.6%

1.6%

.0%

3.1%

.0%

3.1%

.0%

3.1%

55

64

10.9%

85.9%

3.1%

100.0%

ANNEX IV
Reason * Training cross-tabulation
$Reason*Training Crosstabulation
Training
Deck
Reasona

Location

Count
% of Total

Price

Count
% of Total

Facilities

Count
% of Total

Recommend

Count
% of Total

Availability

Count
% of Total

R_others

Count
% of Total

Total

Count
% of Total

Percentages and totals are based on responses.

a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

Total

Engine

Medical

13

27

20.3%

10.9%

10.9%

42.2%

14

10.9%

7.8%

3.1%

21.9%

14

10.9%

7.8%

3.1%

21.9%

4.7%

3.1%

.0%

7.8%

3.1%

.0%

.0%

3.1%

3.1%

.0%

.0%

3.1%

34

19

11

64

53.1%

29.7%

17.2%

100.0%

ANNEX V
Building-Facilities * Training cross-tabulation
Crosstab
Training
Deck
Building

Fair

Very good

.0%

2.8%

.0%

2.8%

11.1%

2.8%

8.3%

22.2%

14

17

38.9%

5.6%

2.8%

47.2%

10

2.8%

16.7%

8.3%

27.8%

19

10

36

52.8%

27.8%

19.4%

100.0%

Count
% of Total

Excellent

Count
% of Total

Total

Count
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio

df

sided)

18.398a

.005

19.619

.003

.309

.578

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

36

a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .19.

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Total

Count
% of Total

Medical

Count
% of Total

Satisfactory

Engine

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.715

.005

Cramer's V

.505

.005

36

ANNEX VI
Instruction * Training cross-tabulation
Crosstab
Training
Deck
Teaching

Fair

.0%

2.8%

.0%

2.8%

11.1%

2.8%

.0%

13.9%

15

22

41.7%

5.6%

13.9%

61.1%

.0%

16.7%

5.6%

22.2%

19

10

36

52.8%

27.8%

19.4%

100.0%

Count
% of Total
Count
% of Total

Excellent

Count
% of Total

Total

Count
% of Total

Medical
1

% of Total

Very good

Engine
0

Count

Satisfactory

Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio

df

sided)

19.031a

.004

22.931

.001

2.950

.086

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

36

a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .19.

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.727

.004

Cramer's V

.514

.004

36

ANNEX VII
Management-staff * Training cross-tabulation
Crosstab
Training
Deck
Staff

Fair

Very good

.0%

2.8%

.0%

2.8%

2.8%

.0%

.0%

2.8%

16

24

44.4%

8.3%

13.9%

66.7%

10

5.6%

16.7%

5.6%

27.8%

19

10

36

52.8%

27.8%

19.4%

100.0%

Count
% of Total

Excellent

Count
% of Total

Total

Count
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio

df

sided)

12.187a

.058

12.687

.048

.874

.350

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

36

a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .19.

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Total

Count
% of Total

Medical

Count
% of Total

Satisfactory

Engine

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.582

.058

Cramer's V

.411

.058

36