Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sec 20 of RA 7160 (Local Government Code)
Sec 20 of RA 7160 (Local Government Code)
(1) For highly urbanized and independent component cities, fifteen percent
(15%);
(2) For component cities and first to the third class municipalities, ten percent
(10%); and
(3) For fourth to sixth class municipalities, five percent (5%): Provided,
further, That agricultural lands distributed to agrarian reform beneficiaries
pursuant to Republic Act Numbered Sixty-six hundred fifty-seven (R.A. No.
6657). otherwise known as "The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law", shall
not be affected by the said reclassification and the conversion of such lands
into other purposes shall be governed by Section 65 of said Act.
(b) The President may, when public interest so requires and upon
recommendation of the National Economic and Development Authority,
authorize a city or municipality to reclassify lands in excess of the limits set in
the next preceding paragraph.
(c) The local government units shall, in conformity with existing laws,
continue to prepare their respective comprehensive land use plans enacted
through zoning ordinances which shall be the primary and dominant bases for
the future use of land resources: Provided. That the requirements for food
production, human settlements, and industrial expansion shall be taken into
consideration in the preparation of such plans.
Reference DAR Administrative Orders No. 1 s. 2002- 2002 Rules and Regulations on
the conversion of Agricultural
The respondents filed a motion for reconsideration, but there was no result
because the justices voted 2-2 in resolving such MR. Now, the respondents
wanted to refer the case to the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court said that the resolution of the MR cannot be referred to
the Court
It based its reasoning on Article 8, Sec. 4 (3) of the Constitution. From that
certain paragraph, the Court differentiated CASES from MATTERS. CASES are
to be DECIDED, while MATTERS are to be RESOLVED. An example of a MATTER
is a motion for reconsideration, such as the one in this case. Only CASES
which do not obtain the required number of votes are required to be elevated
On the other hand, as regards MATTERS, the failure of the division to resolve
the motion because of a tie in the voting does not leave the case undecided.
If there is a tie in resolving a matter, the earlier decision of the Court is
upheld.
RESOLUTION
Facts:
The case reached the OP. The OP rendered a decision reversing the DAR and
converting the land to agro-indusrial area, which became the subject of the
strike of the farmers.
These events led the OP, through then Deputy Exec. Sec. Corona, to issue the
so-called Win-Win Resolution, substantially modifying its earlier Decision
(see decision dated March 29, 1996) after it had already become final and
executory.