Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1190

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011


CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov

LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL COMMISSIONERS

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large) Trinity Haven Schlottman, Chair


Mayor Pro-Tem Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6) Sam Cherry, Vice Chair
Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1) Vicki Quinn
Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5) Todd L. Moody
Councilman Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4) Glenn Trowbridge
Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3) Cedric Crear
Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2)
City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell

Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in the
Council Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. Reasonable efforts will be
made to assist and accommodate persons with disabilities or impairments. If you need an accommodation to
attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at 702-229-6301 and
advise of your need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.

February 14, 2017


6:00 PM
ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO OR
MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BE
REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDA
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM MILES ESCUIN, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3RD FLOOR,
(702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITYS WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.

NOTICE: This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the following locations:

City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st Floor


Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive

ACTIONS: ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASES
THERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITY
COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPON
FILING OF THE APPLICATION.

ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
AGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY
IMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BE
HEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.
Planning Commission February 14, 2017 - Page 1
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

1. Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and
suggested conditions of approval, if appropriate.

2. The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is
complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staffs conditions of
approval.

3. If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staffs condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.

4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. If
more than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and
indicate that he speaks for others in the audience who share his view.

5. Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard,
but in the interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groups
of interested parties.

6. After all objectors input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.

7. Following the applicants response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst
themselves, ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.

8. Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps,
models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed in
for the record unless requested by the Commission.

As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciate
your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.

BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

3. ROLL CALL

4. PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THE
AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR
THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE
SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

5. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS
OF DECEMBER 13, 2016 AND JANUARY 10, 2017.

6. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or
held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.

CONSENT ITEMS:
CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.

Planning Commission February 14, 2017 - Page 2


ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE
THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGS
WILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALL
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE
THAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.

7. TMP-68354 - TENTATIVE MAP - 100 N. MAIN STREET (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) -


APPLICANT/OWNER: 18 FREMONT STREET ACQUISITION, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.12 acres located at the southwest corner of
Ogden Avenue and Main Street (APNs 139-34-101-010 and 139-34-101-003), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5
(Barlow) [PRJ-68352]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

8. VAR-68251 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SHADOW HILLS BAPTIST


CHURCH - For possible action on a request for Variance TO ALLOW 1,072 PARKING SPACES WHERE 1,122
SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 17.97 acres at the southwest corner of Vegas Drive and Gleeson Way (APN 138-28-501-
011), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-68217]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

9. SDR-68250 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-68251 - PUBLIC HEARING -


APPLICANT/OWNER: SHADOW HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 31,772 SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING
CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP on 17.97 acres at the southwest corner of Vegas Drive and Gleeson Way (APN 138-
28-501-011), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-68217]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

10. SUP-68411 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. -
OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED
CONVENIENCE STORE at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-
030), PD (Planned Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain West Special Land Use Designation],
Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

11. SUP-68413 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68411 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR
A PROPOSED SERVICE STATION [CAR WASH AND GASOLINE SALES] at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain
Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial)
Lone Mountain West Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

12. SUP-68414 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68411 AND SUP-68413 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR PROPOSED BEER SALES at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway
(APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain West Special Land
Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

13. SUP-68415 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68411, SUP-68413 AND SUP-68414 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Special Use Permit FOR PROPOSED WINE SALES at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff
Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain
West Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

14. SUP-68416 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414 AND SUP-68415 -
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Special Use Permit FOR PROPOSED GAMING (INCIDENTAL GAMING MACHINES ONLY) at the
southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned
Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain West Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony)
[PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

Planning Commission February 14, 2017 - Page 3


15. SDR-68410 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-
68415, AND SUP-68416 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 4,620 SQUARE-FOOT
CONVENIENCE STORE WITH SERVICE STATION [GASOLINE SALES WITH A 3,666 SQUARE-FOOT CANOPY
AND A 1,020 SQUARE-FOOT CAR WASH] on 2.00 acres at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff
Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain
West Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

16. SUP-68377 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ESTHER'S KITCHEN - OWNER:
BLVD SERIES 1, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A 2,100 SQUARE-FOOT
TAVERN-LIMITED ESTABLISHMENT USE WITH 600 SQUARE FEET OF OUTDOOR SEATING AREA at 1130
South Casino Center Boulevard, Suite #110 (APN 162-03-105-006), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ-68374]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

17. SDR-68263 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:


DOWNTOWN CAC, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-64815) FOR A PROPOSED 302 SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION TO A PROPOSED
2,180 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE-THROUGH AND A 384 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR
DINING AREA on 0.50 acres at the southwest corner of Clark Avenue and Casino Center Boulevard (APN 139-34-302-
009), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68086]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

18. VAC-68294 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMHAR HOLDINGS, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 70-foot public drainage easement located at the northeast corner of
Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way (APN 138-12-801-016), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-67601]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

19. VAC-68343 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC -
OWNER: SUMMIT CENTENNIAL, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government
Patent Easements generally located at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way (APN 126-24-
401-016), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68270]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS


20. ABEYANCE - SDR-66170 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: NIM
MEISHAR - OWNER: B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a
previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0102-73) FOR A WAIVER OF TITLE 19.08 LANDSCAPING IRRIGATION
REQUIREMENTS on 2.34 acres located at 4600 Meadows Lane (APN 139-31-110-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-65854]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

21. ABEYANCE - GPA-68385 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:


180 LAND COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: PR-OS
(PARKS/RECREATION/OPEN SPACE) TO: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 166.99 acres at the southeast
corner of Alta Drive and Hualapai Way (APN 138-31-702-002), Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-67184]. Staff has NO
RECOMMENDATION.

22. WVR-68480 - WAIVER RELATED TO GPA-68385 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND
COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW 32-FOOT PRIVATE STREETS WITH A
SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE WHERE 47-FOOT PRIVATE STREETS WITH SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES ARE
REQUIRED WITHIN A PROPOSED GATED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT on 34.07 acres at the southeast corner
of Alta Drive and Hualapai Way (Lot 1 in File 121, Page 100 of Parcel Maps on file at the Clark County Recorder's
Office; formerly a portion of APN 138-31-702-002), R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development - 7 Units per Acre) Zone,
Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-67184]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

23. SDR-68481 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-68385 AND WVR-68480 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 61-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT on 34.07
acres at the southeast corner of Alta Drive and Hualapai Way (Lot 1 in File 121, Page 100 of Parcel Maps on file at the
Clark County Recorder's Office; formerly a portion of APN 138-31-702-002), R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development -
7 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-67184]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
Planning Commission February 14, 2017 - Page 4
24. TMP-68482 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-68385, WVR-68480 AND SDR-68481 - PARCEL 1 @ THE
180 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Tentative Map FOR A 61-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 34.07 acres at the southeast
corner of Alta Drive and Hualapai Way (Lot 1 in File 121, Page 100 of Parcel Maps on file at the Clark County Recorder's
Office; formerly a portion of APN 138-31-702-002), R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development - 7 Units per Acre) Zone,
Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-67184]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

25. MOD-68579 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
- For possible action on a request for a Major Modification of the Town Center Land Use Plan TO AMEND MAP FOUR
TO ADD THE MC-TC (MONTECITO - TOWN CENTER) LAND USE DESIGNATION AND REMOVE THE
MONTECITO TOWN CENTER MIXED USE COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DESIGNATION on approximately 202.00
acres generally located north of Clark County 215, east of Durango Drive (APNs multiple), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68578].
Staff recommends APPROVAL.

26. ZON-68403 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT GOLF &
FITNESS, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL)
AND C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO: C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on 3.32 acres at 1213 and 1215 South
Las Vegas Boulevard and 516 Park Paseo (APNs 162-03-112-022, 028 and 029), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68241]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

27. SDR-68404 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-68403 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT GOLF & FITNESS, LLC ET AL - For possible action on a request
for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 15-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF
370 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 16,060 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL SPACE on 3.63 acres at 1213 and 1215 South
Las Vegas Boulevard and 516 Park Paseo (APNs 162-03-112-022, 028, 029 and 033), C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-2
(General Commercial) Zones [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial) Zone], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68241]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

28. VAR-66498 - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING -


APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible action on a request for
a Variance TO ALLOW A TEN-FOOT RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK WHERE 81 FEET IS REQUIRED on
1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), O (Office) Zone, Ward
6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

29. VAR-68295 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-66498 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:


MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
44 PARKING SPACES WHERE 49 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of
Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), O (Office) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

30. SDR-66499 - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW


RELATED TO VAR-66498 AND VAR-68295 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY
COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED 8,800 SQUARE-FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-
FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PERIMETER, AN 11-FOOT BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH
PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO NOT ORIENT THE BUILDING TO THE CORNER WHERE
SUCH IS REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-
001), O (Office) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

31. VAR-68150 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: NP PALACE, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A TOTAL OF 11,161 SQUARE FEET OF FREESTANDING SIGN AREA
WHERE 7,880 SQUARE FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED, A 175-FOOT TALL FREESTANDING SIGN
WHERE 40 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED, AND SEVEN WALL SIGNS THAT EXTEND UP TO 108
INCHES ABOVE THE BUILDING ROOF OR PARAPET WHERE 12 INCHES IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED on
30.05 acres at 2411 West Sahara Avenue (APNs Multiple), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-
68149]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

Planning Commission February 14, 2017 - Page 5


32. MSP-68152 - MASTER SIGN PLAN RELATED TO VAR-68150 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
NP PALACE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Master Sign Plan FOR AN EXISTING HOTEL/CASINO on
30.05 acres at 2411 West Sahara Avenue (APNs Multiple), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-
68149]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

33. VAR-68319 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DAPPER DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: TEN15
NOVAT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 116 PARKING SPACES WHERE 132
SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.88 acres at the northwest corner of Cliff Shadows Parkway and Novat Street (APN 137-
12-410-014), PD (Planned Community) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation],
Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68218]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

34. SDR-68318 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-68319 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: DAPPER DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: TEN15 NOVAT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 3,410 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING on 0.88 acres
at the northwest corner of Cliff Shadows Parkway and Novat Street (APN 137-12-410-014), PD (Planned Development)
Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68218]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

35. VAR-68568 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TAL HAREL - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW TWO PARKING SPACES WHERE FOUR ARE REQUIRED on 0.08 acres located
on the west side of 14th Street approximately 415 feet south of Mesquite Avenue, (APN 139-35-212-021), R-3 (Medium
Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68565]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

36. VAR-68575 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-68568 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TAL


HAREL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 2.5-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE
FIVE FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.08 acres located on the west side of 14th Street approximately 415 feet south of
Mesquite Avenue, (APN 139-35-212-021), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68565]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

37. VAR-68592 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DISCOVERY GARDENS CHILD CARE -
OWNER: DT MARK PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 10
PARKING SPACES WHERE 19 IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL CARE CENTER
on 0.69 acres at 555 Page Street (APN 140-32-102-002), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68572].
Staff recommends APPROVAL.

38. SUP-68591 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-68592 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
DISCOVERY GARDENS CHILD CARE - OWNER: DT MARK PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Special Use Permit FOR AN INDIVIDUAL CARE CENTER use at 555 Page Street (APN 140-32-102-002),
R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68572]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

39. VAR-68177 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: OAKTREE CAPITAL SERIES 3, LLC
- For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK WHERE 10
FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING PATIO COVER on 0.17 acres at 420 South Maryland Parkway (APN 139-34-
811-038), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68008]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

40. VAR-68395 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PN II, INC - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW ONE PARKING SPACE WHERE FIVE IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR A
TEMPORARY REAL ESTATE SALES OFFICE USE on 0.41 acres at 8222 Agave Bloom Street (APN 125-09-712-038),
R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68383]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.

41. VAR-68398 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC -
OWNER: SUMMIT GRAND CANYON, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 17-
FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 30 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING on 0.24 acres at 4017 Turquoise Falls Street (APN 138-06-413-008), R-D (Single Family Residential-
Restricted) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68257]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

Planning Commission February 14, 2017 - Page 6


42. VAR-68625 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LA CABANA RESTAURANT - OWNER:
NORTH AMERICAN 888 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LTD - For possible action on a request for a Variance
TO ALLOW A PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN IN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING CONSOLIDATED SIGN
WHERE SUCH IS NOT ALLOWED AND TO ALLOW THE FREESTANDING SIGN TO BE 60 FEET FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED SIGN WHERE 100 FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED at 2800 West Sahara Avenue (APN's
Multiple), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-68283]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

43. SUP-68386 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: IMAGINE ADVENTURES LAS
VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: FAEC HOLDINGS WIRRULLA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A PROPOSED TAVERN-LIMITED ESTABLISHMENT USE at 450 Fremont Street, Suite #250 (APN 139-
34-513-002), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68284]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

44. SUP-68387 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68386 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
IMAGINE ADVENTURES LAS VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: FAEC HOLDINGS WIRRULLA, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A NIGHT CLUB USE WITH WAIVERS OF REQUIRED DISTANCE
SEPARATION TO ALLOW 1,214 FEET FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND 1,340 FEET FROM A
SCHOOL WHERE 1,500 FEET IS REQUIRED at 450 Fremont Street, Suite #250 (APN 139-34-513-002), C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68284]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

45. SUP-68233 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. -
OWNER: REMINGTON COMMERCIAL VIII, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR
A PROPOSED 4,621 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at 7560 Oso
Blanca Road (APN 125-17-314-001), T-C (Town Center) Zone [GC-TC (General Commercial-Town Center) Special
Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-67994]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

46. SUP-68421 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: GALENA EUROPEAN SPA -
OWNER: SSB PROPCO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,208
SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A PARCEL ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 8053
North Durango Drive, Suite #110 (APN 125-08-817-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68095].
Staff recommends APPROVAL.

47. RQR-68072 - REQUIRED REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY
LP - OWNER: ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK - For possible action on a request for a Required Review of an
approved Special Use Permit (SUP-59539) FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING STANDARD TO ALLOW 429
PARKING SPACES WHERE 516 SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING SECONDARY SCHOOL at 7038
Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-21-102-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use - Town Center)
Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68369]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

48. SDR-68129 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS
VEGAS PIZZA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan
Review [Z-0055-72(2)] FOR A PROPOSED DRIVE THROUGH ADDITION TO AN EXISTING RESTAURANT
WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER
WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.60 acres at 3001 West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-08-104-009), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-67967]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

49. SDR-68280 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY
INSTITUTE BUILDING, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Plot
Plan Review (Z-0035-85) FOR A WAIVER OF TITLE 19.08 LANDSCAPING IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS on
0.33 acres located at 820 South Valley View Boulevard (APN 139-31-801-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-67677]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

50. SDR-68300 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: GENE WOODS
RACING - OWNER: T-U P R II, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (OUTDOOR) FACILITY WITH A WAIVER FROM
DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS on 3.63 acres at 222 South Main Street (APN
139-34-101-009), M (Industrial) Zone and C-M (Commercial/Industrial) zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68298]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

Planning Commission February 14, 2017 - Page 7


51. SDR-68409 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
PROVIEW SERIES 31, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-62361) FOR A PROPOSED FIVE-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A UTILITY STRUCTURES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY on 0.25 acres on the east side of
4th Street, approximately 125 feet north of Garces Avenue (APN 139-34-311-137), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone,
Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68176]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

52. ROC-68393 - REVIEW OF CONDITION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CARDENAS - OWNER:


LAMANZA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Review of Condition of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-
38860) TO REMOVE CONDITION #8 WHICH STATES, "ALL BEER AND WINE COOLERS SHALL REMAIN IN
THEIR ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER'S CONFIGURATION OF FOUR OR SIX PACKS" on 6.8 acres at 4700
Meadows Lane (APN 139-31-111-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-68115]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

53. ROC-68407 - REVIEW OF CONDITION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ECLIPSE THEATER


LV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Review of Condition of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-52105)
TO DELETE CONDITION #6 WHICH STATES, "MINORS SHALL ONLY BE PERMITTED IN SUCH AREAS
WHEREIN SPIRITUOUS, MALT OR FERMENTED LIQUOR OR WINES ARE SERVED ONLY IN CONJUNCTION
WITH REGULAR MEALS AND WHERE DINING TABLES OR BOOTHS ARE PROVIDED SEPARATE FROM
THE BAR IN CONFORMANCE WITH TITLE 6.50 on 0.8 acres at 814 South 3rd Street (APN 139-34-401-014), C-2
(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68308]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

54. VAC-68554 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTORY MISSIONARY BAPTIST


CHURCH - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 20-foot wide alley between E Street and F Street;
south of Jackson Avenue, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68175]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:
55. DIR-68163 - DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE NEVADA
SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION - For possible action on a request regarding the Cooperative Campus
Development Agreement for the College of Southern Nevada Northwest Campus on approximately 44.09 acres at the
northwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Grand Montecito Parkway (APNs 125-17-401-006 and 125-17-801-004), Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ-68166]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

56. TXT-68279 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For
possible action on a request to amend LVMC 19.12 related to the Clinic and Office, Medical or Dental uses, and to
provide for other related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

57. TXT-68323 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For
possible action on a request to remove all references to the Montecito Town Center Development Agreement, which
expires on April 7, 2017, to amend the Town Center Development Standards Manual to incorporate the standards of the
area covered by the Development Agreement as a Town Center Land Use District and to provide for other related matters.
Staff recommends APPROVAL.

CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:
58. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE
LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY
BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS
SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME
FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

Planning Commission February 14, 2017 - Page 8


Agenda Item No.: 1.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO

SUBJECT:
CALL TO ORDER
Agenda Item No.: 2.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO

SUBJECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
Agenda Item No.: 3.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO

SUBJECT:
ROLL CALL
Agenda Item No.: 4.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO

SUBJECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO
THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF
DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
Agenda Item No.: 5.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO

SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 13, 2016 AND JANUARY 10, 2017.
Agenda Item No.: 6.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the
applicant wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and
acted upon at this time.
Agenda Item No.: 7.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
TMP-68354 - TENTATIVE MAP - 100 N. MAIN STREET (A COMMERCIAL
SUBDIVISION) - APPLICANT/OWNER: 18 FREMONT STREET ACQUISITION, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL
SUBDIVISION on 2.12 acres located at the southwest corner of Ogden Avenue and Main Street
(APNs 139-34-101-010 and 139-34-101-003), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5
(Barlow) [PRJ-68352]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
TMP-68354 [PRJ-68352]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: 18 FREMONT STREET ACQUISITION,
LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TMP - 68354 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 29

NOTICES MAILED N/A

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

PB
TMP-68354 [PRJ-68352]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

TMP-68354 CONDITIONS
Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final
Map is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map
within four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. Street names must be provided in accordance with the Citys Street Naming
Regulations.

3. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

4. The Final Map shall contain a note granting perpetual common access and parking
across the entire subdivision.

5. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State


Subdivision Statutes.

Public Works

6. Per Title 19.16.060.W.1, add a note to the Final Map stating All lots created by
this Final Map shall have perpetual, irrevocable common access rights to all
driveways servicing this overall site unless incompatible uses can be demonstrated
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

7. The Final Map for this site shall include the commercial subdivision sewer note as
shown on this Tentative Map.

8. Per Title 19.16.060.W.3, provide a note on the Final Map that states "All
subdivided lots within this Final Map shall provide perpetual inter-lot drainage
rights across all existing and future parcel limits."

9. Provide proof that the existing public sewer line on this site adjacent to Ogden
Avenue is within an acceptable Public Sewer Easement. If such easement does
not exist, grant a Public Sewer Easement acceptable to the Sewer Planning
Section of the Department of Public Works for the existing public sewer line on the
Final Map for this site.

PB
TMP-68354 [PRJ-68352]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

10. Contact the City Engineers Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development
of this project with the Ogden Underpass project, the Symphony Park North
Pedestrian Bridge project, and any other public improvement projects adjacent to
this site. Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.

11. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative
Map is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size,
type and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer
and drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction
plans by the City. No additional deviations from adopted City Standards shall be
allowed unless specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer
prior to the recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision related
construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does
not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a
revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.

PB
TMP-68354 [PRJ-68352]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant requests approval of a Tentative Map for a one-lot commercial


subdivision on 2.12 acres located on the southwest corner of Main Street and Ogden
Avenue.

ISSUES

The subject site is developed with a surface parking lot; there are no proposed
changes or additions to the site at this time.
The applicant has stated within the submitted justification letter that it intends to
create a one-lot commercial subdivision so that a parking garage may be provided
for the future casino project across Main Street.

ANALYSIS

The applicant requests approval of a Tentative Map for a one-lot commercial


subdivision on 2.12 acres located on the southwest corner of Main Street and Ogden
Avenue. There is an existing surface parking lot on the subject site, and it was also
previously the site of the Main Street Station train display. The train display has been
removed from the site.

Access to the site is currently provided from Main Street through the Main Street Station
surface parking lot. Site circulation is logical throughout the site and will be unaffected
by mapping. Parking and access is intended to be allowed across the site. A condition
of approval will require that common perpetual access and parking will be granted
across the entire proposed commercial subdivision.

Public Works staff notes that north/south and east/west cross sections are not shown
with this Tentative Map submittal. However, since this property and all surrounding
property is developed or graded, no retaining walls are shown or anticipated as no
changes are proposed.

The map meets and complies with the Title 19 and NRS 278 requirements for a
Tentative Map; therefore, staff recommends approval with conditions. If denied, the
existing parcel would remain.

PB
TMP-68354 [PRJ-68352]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (TMP-67889)

All Title 19 zoning and NRS 278 and technical requirements regarding tentative maps
are satisfied. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the subject tentative map with
conditions.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


A Rezoning (Z-0098-95) from C2 (General Commercial) and CM
12/20/1995 (Commercial Industrial) to C2 (General Commercial) was approved by
the City Council to allow expansion of the Main Street Station Casino.
A Site Development Plan Review (Z-0098-95[1]) for the expansion of
5/9/1996 Main Street Station Casino was approved by the Planning
Commission.
A Special Use Permit (U-0137-99) for an Automobile Rental Facility
2-16-2000
was approved by the City Council on the subject site.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


09/26/2016 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#96016553) was issued for the Main Street Station
08/13/1996
expansion, including a surface parking lot on the subject site.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff held a pre-application meeting with the applicant and reviewed
12/29/2016
the submittal requirements.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood Meeting was not required or held

Field Check
During a routine site visit it was noted that the train display was being
1/5/2017 removed from the site, otherwise the site is developed with a standard
surface parking lot.

PB
TMP-68354 [PRJ-68352]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 2.12

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C2 (General
Parking Facility C (Commercial)
Property Commercial)
C2 (General
North Hotel/Casino C (Commercial)
Commercial)
C2 (General
South Hotel/Casino C (Commercial) Commercial) & M
(Industrial)
C2 (General
East Hotel/Casino C (Commercial)
Commercial)
Union Pacific
West Right of Way Right of Way
Railroad

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District Y
Downtown Casino Overlay District Y
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 19.08, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size N/A 2.12 Acres Y
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 257 Feet Y

PB
TMP-68354 [PRJ-68352]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Main Street Primary Arterial 100 Y
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Ogden Avenue Primary Arterial 100 Y
Highways Map

PB
TMP-68354



TMP-68354


TMP-68354


b
A



777
7
777
77
)77

TMP-68354



777
7
777
77
)77

TMP-68354 [PRJ-68352] - TENTATIVE MAP - APPLICANT/OWNER: 18 FREMONT STREET ACQUISITION, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OGDEN AVENUE AND MAIN STREET
01/05/17

TMP-68354
Agenda Item No.: 8.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68251 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SHADOW HILLS
BAPTIST CHURCH - For possible action on a request for Variance TO ALLOW 1,072
PARKING SPACES WHERE 1,122 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 17.97 acres at the southwest
corner of Vegas Drive and Gleeson Way (APN 138-28-501-011), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 2
(Beers) [PRJ-68217]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
5. Support Postcard - VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SHADOW HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-68251 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
.
SDR-68250 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: VAR-68251

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 38

NOTICES MAILED 1915

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 0

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68251 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-
0125-97) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-68250 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-
0125-97) shall be required unless amended herein.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


68251) shall be required, if approved

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 01/17/17, except as amended by conditions
herein.

5. All parking lot landscape islands located adjacent to or south of the proposed
building expansion shall be planted with parking lot trees as required by Title
19.08.110

6. All mechanical equipment shall be screened per Title 19.08 requirements

7. All proposed trash enclosures shall be enclosed and roofed per Title 19.08
requirements.

8. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

9. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

11. Correct all American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks
adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040 to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.

12. An update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage
Study must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior
to submittal of any construction drawings or the issuance of any building or grading
permits, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways
recommended in the approved drainage study update.

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for a 31,772 square-foot expansion to an existing Church/House of


Worship at the southwest corner of Vegas Drive and Glesson Way. The expansion
building will be utilized as a bible study center for students in grades K through 12.

ISSUES

The request is for a Site Development Plan Review for a 31,772 square-foot
expansion to an existing Church/House of Worship. Staff recommends approval of
the request.
The applicant is proposing 6,800 square feet of worship area within the proposed
31,772 square-foot building addition, increasing the parking demand by 68 spaces.
In addition, 28 parking spaces will be removed with the construction of the new
building, resulting in a parking deficit of 40 spaces.
A Variance has been requested to allow 1,082 parking spaces where 1,122 are
required, resulting in a deviation of less than one percent. Staff recommends
approval of the request.

ANALYSIS

The request is for a 31,772 square-foot expansion to an existing Church/House of


Worship at the southwest corner of Vegas Drive and Glesson Way. The expansion
building will be utilized as a bible study center for students in grades K through 12. The
building will be located in the southern portion of the existing church campus, which
houses separate facilities for worship, child care, administration, and recreation. There
are five existing modular buildings that are currently utilized as classrooms. Two of the
existing five modular will be removed with the construction of the proposed bible study
building expansion.

The subject site receives access via a drive from Vegas Drive, and there are 1,082
parking spaces where 1,122 are required. A Variance has been requested to provide
relief from the minimum parking requirement, which results in a deviation of 0.96
percent. With the exception of Sundays and Wednesday, the bible study will be
conducted during hours that do not coincide with services at the primary worship hall,
resulting in the proposed deficiency not having a significant impact on the overall site
parking. Staff recommends approval of the Variance request.

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Various five and one-gallon shrubs are proposed along the southern portion of the
building within the required 5-foot buffer area between the parking lot and building. A
condition of approval has been included to ensure that all existing parking lot islands are
planted with the required 24-inch box trees and five-gallon shrubs. All other perimeter
and site landscaping has been installed with previous phases.

The elevations depict a 28-foot tall building with a flat roof and pitched metal canopies.
The stucco exterior will be painted in hues of red and blue in order to match the existing
adjacent buildings on the site.

The proposed building is an appropriate and compatible expansion to the existing


religious campus. There will be minimal impact to the surrounding multi-family uses,
and the proposed bible study is permitted within religious facilities. Staff recommends
approval of the request.

FINDINGS (VAR-68251)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

Title 19.12 requires one parking space for each 100 square feet of gathering space for a
Church/House of Worship. The applicant is proposing 6,800 square feet of worship
area within the proposed 31,772 square-foot bible study building addition, increasing the
parking demand by 68 spaces. In addition, 28 parking spaces will be removed with the
construction of the new building, resulting in an overall parking deficiency of 40 spaces.

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

A Variance has been requested to allow 1,082 parking spaces where 1,122 are
required, resulting in a deviation of less than one percent. With the exception of
Sundays and Wednesday, the bible study will be conducted during hours that do not
coincide with services at the primary worship hall. As the various on-site church
functions are conducted at different times, and the minor parking deficiency is less than
one percent of the required amount, staff recommends approval of the Variance
request.

FINDINGS (SDR-68250)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed expansion to an existing Church/House of Worship is compatible


with adjacent development and development in the area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

With approval of the companion Variance request, the site will be consistent with
all duly-adopted plans, policies and standards.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Site access and circulation does not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

The building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City,
and are consistent with the existing religious facilities on the site.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The building elevations are not unsightly or obnoxious in appearance, and will be
harmonious and compatible with development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

Appropriate measures have been taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a Special Use Permit (U-
10/24/95
124-95) for a Church/House of Worship.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-68-97)
from P (Parks, Recreation and Open space) to PF (Pubic Facility) and
01/26/98 a Rezoning request (Z-125-97) from U (Undeveloped) zone to C-V
(Civic) zone. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended
approval on 12/18/1998
Department of Planning Staff approved an administrative Site
07/15/99 Development Plan Review [Z-125-97(1)] to allow five temporary
classroom trailers in conjunction with an existing church.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review
09/26/02 [Z-125-97(2)] for a 19,000 square-foot gymnasium addition to an
existing church.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


03/09/2000 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held and general Variance and Site
12/15/16
Development Plan Review submittal requirements were discussed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required nor was one held.

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
A field check was conducted and the site is a developed with a
01/05/16
religious campus.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 17.97

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject Church/House of
PF (Public Facility) C-V (Civic)
Property Worship
Single Family P-C (Planned
North SUM (Summerlin)
Residential Community)
RPD-14 (Residential
Multi-Family M (Medium Density
South Planned Development
Residential Residential)
14 units per acre)
RPD-14 (Residential
M (Medium Density
Planned Development
Residential); MLA
Multi-Family 14 units per acre);
East (Medium Low
Residential RPD-12 (Residential
Attached Density
Planned Development
Residential)
12 units per acre)
RPD-14 (Residential
Multi-Family M (Medium Density
West Planned Development
Residential Residential)
14 units per acre)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
C-V (Civic) District N
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.10, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size N/A 17.97 acres Y
Min. Lot Width N/A 350 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front N/A 145 Feet Y
Side N/A 145 Feet Y
Corner N/A 150 Feet Y
Rear N/A 135 Feet Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings N/A 20 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage N/A 16 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A 28 Feet Y
Screened,
Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or
Roof or Trellis Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Vegas Drive Major Collector Highways Map 80 Y

FS
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 [PRJ-68217]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
100 SF of
non-fixed
Existing seating
Gathering 105,400 area in 1,054
Room the
gathering
room.
100 SF of
non-fixed
Proposed seating
Gathering 6,800 area in 68
Room the
gathering
room.
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 1,122 1,082 N
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 1,099 23 1,052 30 N
Percent Deviation 0.96%

FS
VAR-68251
A



A77bb7A

7 

VAR-68251



7 A A

b b 7 7 7

A 7 

7 A A7 7
7 7 7 Ab A 7 Ab
7 7 7 A 7  A 7 

Ab
7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7 7
7 A  7 7 A

7 b A A A7 7 7
7 7 7 7 
7 7 7 7 

7 7 7  7 

7  A

7 A A 7 A 7 A A

A 7 77 7 7 7 7 Ab
Ab b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 77 7 7 7 7 Ab
Ab b 7 7 7 7 77777 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab

7 A 7 7  7 b
7  7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
7  7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 Ab 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
Ab b 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
7 7 7

7 A 7 A A

A 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 Ab b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 Ab b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab

7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7

A 7 A 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 777

7  7 A 7 7 7 A 7 A 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab

b 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab

A77AA7A7bA7A7A7AA7A7A7A
b77bA7A7777b777A7AA
7A7Ab

7
b 7 A
7 A


VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 - REVISED A

A 7 7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7
A 7 77 b b

A 7 7
A 7 7 77 7
77 77 b 7 77
7 A A

b b 7 7 7

A 7 

7 A A7 7
7 7 7 Ab A 7 Ab
7 7 7 A 7  A 7 

Ab
7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7 7
7 A  7 7 A

7 b A A A7 7 7
7 7 7 7 
7 7 7 7 

7 7 7  7 

7  A

7 A A 7 A 7 A A

A 7 77 7 7 7 7 Ab
Ab b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 77 7 7 7 7 Ab
Ab b 7 7 7 7 77777 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab

7 A 7 7  7 b
7  7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
7  7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 Ab 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
Ab b 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
7 7 7

7 A 7 A A

A 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 Ab b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
A 7 Ab b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab

7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7

A 7 A 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 777

7  7 A 7 7 7 A 7 A 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab

b 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ab

A77AA7A7bA7A7A7AA7A7A7A
b77bA7A7777b777A7AA
7A7Ab

7
b 7 A
7 A


VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 - REVISED A

A 7 7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7
A 7 77 b b

A 7 7
A 7 7 77 7
77 77 b 7 77
A b A 7 A A

A b A 7 A

7
A
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 - REVISED
A 7 7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7
A 7 77 b b

A 7 7
A 7 7 77 7
77 77 b 7 77
A b A 7 A A

A b A 7 A

7
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 - REVISED A

A 7 7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7
A 7 77 b b

A 7 7
A 7 7 77 7
77 77 b 7 77
A 7 7 7 7 7

A 7 b A 7 A 7 b A

A 7
b b 7 7 b 7 b b 7 7 b 7 b b 7 7 b 7 b b 7 b 7 7 A b
7 7 A 7 7 A b A b A b A b 7 7 7 A A
7 A Ab 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b 7
A Ab 7 A Ab 7 A Ab 7

7 A

A 7 b A 7 b b 7 7 b 7 A 7
b b 7 7 b 7 A 7 b A b b 7 7 b 7 A
A b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 A b A b b A
A Ab 7 A b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A Ab 7 A Ab 7 A Ab 7

A 7

7

7 A

A 7

b b 7 7 b 7 7 A b 7 7 A 7 7 A b
7 7 7 A Ab
b b 7 7 b 7 7 A Ab 7
A 7 b A 7 b b 7 7 b 7 A 7 b A
A b A b A 7 b A
7 7 7 7 7 7 b b 7 7 b 7 7 A b A 7 b A
A Ab 7 A Ab 7 7 7 7 A Ab

A 7 A 7 7 A

7 A

7
A
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 - REVISED
A 7 7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7
A 7 77 b b

A 7 7
A 7 7 77 7
77 77 b 7 77
A 7 b A 7 A 7 b A

A 7
b b 7 7 b 7 b b 7 7 b 7 b b 7 7 b 7 b b 7 b 7 7 A b
7 7 A 7 7 A b A b A b A b 7 7 7 A A
7 A Ab 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b 7
A Ab 7 A Ab 7 A Ab 7

7 A

A 7 b A 7 b b 7 7 b 7 A 7
b b 7 7 b 7 A 7 b A b b 7 7 b 7 A
A b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 A b A b b A
A Ab 7 A b 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
A Ab 7 A Ab 7 A Ab 7

A 7

7

7 A

A 7

b b 7 7 b 7 7 A b 7 7 A 7 7 A b
7 7 7 A Ab
b b 7 7 b 7 A Ab 7
A 7 b A 7 b b 7 7 b 7 A 7 b A
A b A b A 7 b A
7 7 7 7 7 7 b b 7 7 b 7 7 A b A 7 b A
A Ab 7 A Ab 7 7 7 7 A Ab

A 7 A 7 7 A

7 A

7
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 - REVISED A

A 7 7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7
A 7 77 b b

A 7 7
A 7 7 77 7
77 77 b 7 77
A 7 A A

77 777 777 7
b777 7 7
77 7 7
7b7 7 7
77b7 7 7
77b7 7 7
77b7 7 7
77 7 7
77 7 7
77 7 7
77 7 7
77 7 7
777 7 7
777 7 7
b7 7 7
b7 7 7
77 7 7
77 7 7
77 7 7
77 7 7
777

777

 7 A

7
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 - REVISED
A

A 7 7 b
7 7 7 7 7 7
A 7 77 b b

A 7 7
A 7 7 77 7
77 77 b 7 77
A
b

b7 A7A

A7b



7 A A
VAR-68251 and SDR-68250 - REVISED
A 7 7 b
A 7 7 b b

A 7 7
A 7 7 777 7
7 7 77 b 7 7
VAR-68251 [PRJ-68217] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-68250 - APPLICANT/OWNER: SHADOW HILLS BAPTIST
CHURCH
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VEGAS DRIVE AND GLEESON WAY
01/05/17
VAR-68251 [PRJ-68217] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-68250 - APPLICANT/OWNER: SHADOW HILLS BAPTIST
CHURCH
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VEGAS DRIVE AND GLEESON WAY
01/05/17
7

b777777

7777777b7777b7A77
7 7

7777

77777777777777
77 77777777 7b777
77b777777777777777
777777777777 777
777777777777777
777

A777777777777777
7777777777777
7777777777777
77

77777777777777777
777777777777777A77
7777777777777777
77777777777777777
77777777777777
7

77777777777
77 7 77
7 7 7
77 7
77 7


B7777777777777777

77777
77 7

VAR-68251 and SDR-68250

77777 A7 7 77 77 77 77 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 b77 7 b77 777777 A7A77 7777 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 77  7 777777777


77 7 7 7 7 7
7777
7
777777
A7A
77777
77 7 77
77 77777
77 7

7777B7
77 7 77
777 77
77 7
77 7

77777
77 7 77
B7 7 7
777 77
77 7
77 7

7777A7
77 7 77
B7 7 777

77777777777777

Abb
7A7

77 7777


VAR-68251 and SDR-68250

77777 A7 7 77 77 77 77 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 b77 7 b77 777777 A7A77 7777 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 77  7 777777777


77 7 7 7 7 7
7777
7
777777
A7A
Agenda Item No.: 9.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68250 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-68251 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SHADOW HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH - For possible
action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 31,772 SQUARE-
FOOT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP on 17.97 acres at
the southwest corner of Vegas Drive and Gleeson Way (APN 138-28-501-011), C-V (Civic)
Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-68217]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SDR-68250



A77bb7A




SDR-68250



SDR 68250
Shadow Hills Baptist Church

SWC Vegas Drive & Gleeson Way


Proposed 31.772 thousand square foot expansion of an existing church.

Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.11 289


PM Peak Hour CHURCH [1000 SF] 31.772 0.55 17
Sunday Peak Hour 12.04 383

Existing Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.11 848


PM Peak Hour CHURCH [1000 SF] 93.077 0.55 51
Sunday Peak Hour 12.04 1,121

Total Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.11 1,137


PM Peak Hour CHURCH [1000 SF] 124.849 0.55 68
Sunday Peak Hour 12.04 1,504

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Vegas Drive
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,400
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 592

Buffalo Drive
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 33,631
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 2,690

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Vegas Drive 33,800
Buffalo Drive 53,445

This project will add approximately 289 trips per day on Vegas Dr., Gleeson Wy. and Buffalo Dr. Currently, Vegas is at
about 22 percent of capacity and Buffalo is at about 63 percent of capacity. With this project, Vegas is expected to be
about 23 percent of capacity and Buffalo to be unchanged. Counts are not available for Gleeson, but it is believed to be
under capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 383 additional cars, or about thirteen every two
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Agenda Item No.: 10.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68411 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE
HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain
Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned Development) Zone
[VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain West Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4
(Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416
and SDR-68410 [PRJ-68190]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416
and SDR-68410 [PRJ-68190]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416
and SDR-68410 [PRJ-68190]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416 and SDR-68410
[PRJ-68190]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416 and
SDR-68410 [PRJ-68190]
6. Protest Postcard - SUP-68411 and SUP-68413 [PRJ-68190]
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015,
LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-68411 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SDR-68410
SUP-68413 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SDR-68410
SUP-68414 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SDR-68410
SUP-68415 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SDR-68410
SUP-68416 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SDR-68410
SDR-68410 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-68411
SUP-68413

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 8

NOTICES MAILED 563 - SUP-68411 and SUP-68413


563 - SUP-68414 and SUP-68415
563 - SUP-685416 and SDR-68410

APPROVALS 0 - SUP-68411 and SUP-68413


0 - SUP-68414 and SUP-68415
0 - SUP-685416 and SDR-68410

PROTESTS 1 - SUP-68411
2 - SUP-68413
2 - SUP-68414 and SUP-68415
2 - SUP-685416 and SDR-68410

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-68411 CONDITIONS (Convenience Store)

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-68410) shall be required.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SUP-68413 CONDITIONS (Service Station)

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-68410) shall be required.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SUP-68414 CONDITIONS (Beer)

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-68410) shall be required.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor
license.

6. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Conditions Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

SUP-68415 CONDITIONS (Wine)

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-68410) shall be required.

2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

3. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

4. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor
license.

5. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SUP-68416 CONDITIONS (Gaming)

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-68410) shall be required.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-68410 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-68411), Special Use Permit (SUP-68413), Special Use Permit (SUP-68414),
Special Use Permit (SUP-68415), Special Use Permit (SUP-68416), and Special
Use Permit (SUP-68534) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 01/04/17, except as amended by conditions
herein.

4. The Trash Enclosure and Mechanical Equipment shall be screened in accordance


with Title 19.08.040(E)(4).

5. Lighting shall be in compliance with the Lone Mountain West Master Development
Plan and Design Standards.

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Conditions Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

7. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

8. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,


Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

9. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

10 All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

11. Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalk and
the proposed driveways adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements
of Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with
development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site.

12. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets
concurrent with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend
from the sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway
network and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.

13. All private improvements and landscaping installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

14. Contact the City Engineers Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development
of this project with the Gowan Box Canyon Lone Mountain Road project and
any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the
recommendations of the City Engineer.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Conditions Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

15. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the Cliff
Shadows Parkway public rights-of-way, if any, prior to the issuance of permits for
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of
the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured
entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property within the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right-of-way shall be the responsibility of the
applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to
the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the License
Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and
Safety (229-4836).

16. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of
any construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and
#234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent
to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. Phased
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor
compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of
approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the
development of this site.

17. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building
or grading permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved
drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended
by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review for a proposed 4,620 square-foot
Convenience Store with a 3,666 square-foot fuel canopy, and a 1,020 square-foot Car
Wash located on 2.0 acres at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff
Shadows Parkway. The subject site is located within the Master Plan area of Lone
Mountain West, which requires a Special Use Permit for each of the proposed land
uses: Convenience Store, Service Station (Car Wash and Gasoline Sales), Beer Sales,
Wine Sales, and Gaming (incidental gaming machines only).

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required for a Convenience Store within the Lone Mountain
West Master Plan area. Staff is recommending approval of this application.
A Special Use Permit is required for a Service Station (Car Wash and Gasoline
Sales) within the Lone Mountain West Master Plan area. Staff is recommending
approval of this application.
A Special Use Permit is required for Beer Sales within the Lone Mountain West
Master Plan area. Staff is recommending approval of this application.
A Special Use Permit is required for Wine Sales within the Lone Mountain West
Master Plan area. Staff is recommending approval of this application.
A Special Use Permit is required for Gaming (incidental gaming machines only)
within the Lone Mountain West Master Plan area. Staff is recommending approval of
this application.
A Site Development Plan Review is required for the proposed 4,620 square-foot
Convenience Store with a 3,666 square-foot fuel canopy, and a 1,020 square-foot
Car Wash. Staff is recommending approval of this application.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located within the Master Plan area of Lone Mountain West with a
land use designation of VC (Village Commercial). The Village Commercial land use
designation addresses parcels up to 20 acres in size with a maximum lot coverage of 30
percent. This category allows low to medium intensity retail, office or other commercial
uses that serve primarily local area patrons and does not include more intense general

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

commercial characteristics. Village Commercial is typically located on the periphery of


residential neighborhoods and should be confined to the intersections of major arterials
and major freeways. The subject site is a corner lot adjacent to a Lone Mountain is a
100-foot Primary Arterial (Lone Mountain Road) and an 80-foot Major Collector (Cliff
Shadows Parkway).

The applicant has proposed to develop the far northeast corner of the site while leaving
the far western edge of the site undeveloped at this time. The development includes a
4,620 square-foot Convenience Store with a Car Wash bay located on the north side of
the Convenience Store, and a fuel canopy located approximately 57 feet south of the
Convenience Store.

The Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design Standards requires a
Special Use Permit for each of the proposed land uses: Convenience Store, Service
Station (Car Wash and Gasoline Sales), Beer Sales, Wine Sales, and Gaming
(Incidental Gaming Machines Only). While the Lone Mountain West Master
Development Plan and Design Standards do not list specific minimum Special Use
Permit requirements, the proposed land uses do meet the minimum Special Use Permit
requirements set forth by Title 19.12 which include a minimum distance separation of
400 feet (measured parcel line to parcel line) from protected uses such as a
Church/House of Worship, a school, an individual care center licensed for more than 12
children, and a City park; and a vehicle stacking lane for a Car Wash able to
accommodate a minimum of six vehicles.

Building Placement and Orientation:


Per the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design Standards, the
orientation of a building or structure upon a site must reflect not only the projects
functional needs, but also must be responsive to the individual parcels characteristics
and sensitive to adjacent land uses and the larger surrounding community. The
proposed site plan took into consideration the parcels characteristics including being a
corner lot adjacent to both a Primary Arterial and a Major Collector while being adjacent
to single family homes on both the south and east perimeters of the subject site. The
building is oriented to the corner to provide the maximum distance possible between the
commercial uses and the residential uses. The proposed site plan also provides deep
landscape buffers to shield the stacking lane and wash bay of the car wash from the
right-of-way. As required by the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and
Design Standards, a direct pedestrian pathway has been provided onto the site from the
pedestrian sidewalk, and a well-defined building entry has been provided for
pedestrians. Vehicular traffic will have special paving to create a sense of arrival. The
primary building entry has been emphasized by receding the entrance in accordance
with the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design Standards.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Elevations:
The Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design Standards discourages
the use of white, off-white, and gray for building color selection and requires a minimum
of ten percent of contrasting materials for the building facade. In compliance with this
requirement, the applicant has proposed a building that is bathed in warm earth-toned
colors with contrasting materials such as stone veneer, cement plaster, aluminum, and
steel awnings.

Landscaping:
In accordance with the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design
Standards, the landscape plan depicts a site where 15 percent of the parcel area is
landscaped. The landscape materials used are from the Lone Mountain West Plant
Palette and include Blue Palo Verde trees, and lantana shrubs.

Complete Streets:
The sidewalk adjacent to the subject has already been installed and the Department of
Public Works has waived the Complete Street Standard in order to keep the area
uniform. The applicant has provided the required pedestrian pathway that links the
building to the existing sidewalk as required by the Lone Mountain West Master
Development Plan and Design Standards.

FINDINGS (SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, and SUP-68416) [for


Convenience Store, Service Station (Car Wash and Gasoline Sales), Beer Sales, Wine
Sales, and Gaming (incidental gaming machines only) respectively].

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious


and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The subject site is designated VC (Village Commercial) by the Lone Mountain


West Master Development Plan and Design Standards which allows commercial
uses that serve primarily local area patrons. The proposed site design allows the
proposed land uses to be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. Village Commercial is typically
located on the periphery of residential neighborhoods and should be confined to
the intersections of major arterials and major freeways, which the subject site is.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject site is located on the corner of a Primary Arterial and a Major
Collector in the VC (Village Commercial) District of the Lone Mountain West
Master Plan which is specifically designed to accommodate commercial uses that
serve primarily local area patrons such as a convenience store with fuel pumps
and a car wash.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Lone Mountain Road is a Primary Arterial and Cliff Shadows Parkway is a Major
Collector as defined by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, both of which
are adequate in size to accommodate the vehicular traffic associated with the
proposed land uses.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.

The proposed development will be subject to design review during the building
permit process, as well as regular inspections during the construction phase of the
project. Once in operation, the proposed land uses will be subject to regular
inspection by the Planning Department, Business Licensing Division. These
safeguards ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the general public before,
during, and after the proposed project is developed.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

While the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design
Standards do not list specific minimum Special Use Permit requirements, the
proposed land uses do meet the minimum Special Use Permit requirements set
forth by Title 19.12 which include a minimum distance separation of 400 feet
(measured parcel line to parcel line) from protected uses such as a
Church/House of Worship, a school, an individual care center licensed for more
than 12 children, and a City park; and a vehicle stacking lane for a Car Wash
able to accommodate a minimum of six vehicles.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (SDR-68410)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed development is in accordance with the development standards set


forth by the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design
Standards and is compatible with adjacent development and development in the
area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development has met the minimum design requirements set forth
by the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design Standards as
well as City plans, policies and standards.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

The proposed site circulation allows for access from both Lone Mountain Road
and Cliff Shadows Parkway while allowing for traffic to flow easily through and
around the fuel pumps as well as the remaining parking lot area.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

The building and landscape materials are in accordance with the Lone Mountain
West Master Development Plan and Design Standards and are appropriate for the
area and the City.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The building elevations and design characteristics are in accordance with the
Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design Standards and are
not unsightly, or obnoxious in appearance. They will positively contribute to the
Lone Mountain West Master Plan theme and be harmonious and compatible with
development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed development will be subject to design review during the building
permit process, as well as regular inspections during the construction phase of the
project. Once in operation, the proposed land uses will be subject to regular
inspection by the Planning Department, Business Licensing Division. These
safeguards ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the general public before,
during, and after the proposed project is developed.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a Major Modification [Z-0024-
99(44)] to the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan to add
approximately five acres to the plan and to designate the northern half
VC (Village Commercial) and the southern half as ML (Medium Low
Density Residential) adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone
Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-
0081-02) for the sale of packaged liquor for off-premise consumption
in conjunction with a proposed convenience store adjacent to the
southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway.
09/18/02 The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-
0082-02) for gasoline sales in conjunction with a proposed
convenience store adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain
Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-
0083-02) for a tavern adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone
Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway.
The City Council approved a request for Site Development Plan
Review [Z-0067-99(2)] for a convenience store with gasoline pumps
and a tavern on approximately two acres adjacent to the southwest
corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
5064) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0081-02) that allowed the
sale of packaged liquor for off-premise consumption in conjunction
with a proposed convenience store adjacent to the southwest corner of
Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
5066) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0082-02) that allowed
gasoline sales in conjunction with a proposed convenience store
adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff
10/06/04
Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
5068) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0083-02) for a proposed
tavern adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and
Cliff Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
5070) of an approved Site Development Plan Review [Z-0067-99(2)]
that allowed a tavern and convenience store with fuel pumps adjacent
to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows
Parkway. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
15963) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0081-02) that allowed
the sale of packaged liquor for off-premise consumption in conjunction
with a proposed convenience store adjacent to the southwest corner of
Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
15962) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0082-02) that allowed
gasoline sales in conjunction with a proposed convenience store
adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff
09/20/06
Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
15961) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0083-02) to allow a
tavern adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and
Cliff Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
15958) of an approved Site Development Plan Review [Z-0067-99(2)]
that allowed a tavern and convenience store with fuel pumps adjacent
to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows
Parkway. Staff recommended approval.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a Variance (VAR-22100) to
allow a 27.2-foot tall retail building to be 20 feet from residential
property where residential adjacency standards require an 81.6-foot
setback on 2.00 acres adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone
Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Variance (VAR-21993) to
allow 123 parking spaces where 134 parking spaces are required for a
proposed 16,663 square-foot commercial shopping center on 2.00
acres adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and
Cliff Shadows Parkway. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended denial.
09/05/07 The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-21992) for a proposed 9,663 square-foot commercial
shopping center with a 3,500 square-foot tavern and 3,000 square-foot
convenience store with Waivers of Lone Mountain West landscape
standards and Waivers to allow zero-foot perimeter landscape buffer
on a portion of the north property line where 15 feet is required, a
three-foot perimeter landscape buffer on a portion of the east property
line where 15 feet is required, a zero-foot perimeter landscape buffer
on a portion of the south property line where eight feet is required, and
a four-foot perimeter landscape buffer on a portion of the west property
line where eight feet is required on 2.00 acres adjacent to the
southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a petition to vacate (VAC-26442) a 20-foot
04/02/08 public drainage easement located at 10591 West Lone Mountain
Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
A Parcel Map (PMP-27288) recorded for reversion to acreage of
07/16/08 approximately 2.00 acres located at the southwest corner of Lone
Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
29765) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0081-02) that allowed
the sale of packaged liquor for off-premise consumption in conjunction
10/15/08
with a proposed convenience store adjacent to the southwest corner of
Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended
approval.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
29764) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0082-02) that allowed
gasoline sales in conjunction with a proposed convenience store
adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff
Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
29763) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0083-02) to allow a
tavern adjacent to the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and
Cliff Shadows Parkway. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Review of Condition (ROC-
32322) to amend condition number twenty-two (22) of an approved
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-21992) which required a traffic
impact analysis prior to issuance of permits to allow traffic impact fees
12/17/08
to be in accordance with Title 4.32 for an approved 9,663 square-foot
commercial shopping center on 2.00 acres adjacent to the southwest
corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway. Staff
recommended approval.
Code Enforcement processed a complaint (#87371) for a vacant lot
03/12/10 with trash and debris dumped on site. The case was resolved on
04/06/10.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


10/12/01 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#217483) was issued for a sign (new home
08/13/12 directional sign) at 10591 West Lone Mountain Road. The permit
expired on 02/14/13.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held where the submittal requirements
for a Site Development Plan Review and associated Special Use
Permit applications were discussed. In addition, the site design
12/19/16
requirements as defined by the Lone Mountain West Master
Development Plan and Design Standards were also discussed for the
proposed development.

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Ten
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check where the subject vacant,
01/05/17
undeveloped lot was observed. Nothing of concern was noted by staff.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 2.0

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject
Undeveloped PCD PD
Property
North Undeveloped PCD U (PCD)
Single Family,
South PCD PD
Detached
Single Family,
East PCD PD
Detached
R-PD12 (Residential
Single Family, MLA (Medium Low
West Planned Development
Attached Density Residential)
12 Units Per Acre)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Lone Mountain West Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
PD (Planned Development) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Centennial Hills Sector Plan Y
Northwest Open Space Plan Y
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Eleven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design Standards,
the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet 25 Feet Y
Side 10 Feet 16 Feet Y
Corner N/A N/A N/A
Rear 20 Feet 123 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 30 % 6.5 % Y
Max. Building Height 35 Feet 22 Feet Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure By Condition
Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened By Condition

Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance


3:1 proximity slope 60 Feet 86 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 154 Feet Y

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and
Design Standards, the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 10 Trees 10 Trees Y
South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 13 Trees 13 Trees Y
East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet Undeveloped Undeveloped N/A
West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 9 Trees 9 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 32 Trees 32 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
4 Trees 4 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces

NE
SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416, and SDR-68410 [PRJ-
68190]
Staff Report Page Twelve
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Landscaping and Open Space Standards


Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North 15 Feet 25 Feet Y
South 8 Feet 10 Feet Y
East Undeveloped N/A N/A
West 15 Feet 16 Feet Y
Portion of parcel to be landscaped: 15% 15% Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Existing Existing

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Lone Mountain
Primary Arterial Streets and 40 Y*
Road
Highways
Master Plan of
Cliff Shadows
Major Collector Streets and 80 Y
Parkway
Highways
*Half street improvements are installed.

Pursuant to Title 19.12, the following parking standards apply:


Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Convenience
4,620 SF 1:175 27
Store
Car Wash 1,020 SF 1:150 7
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 34 34 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 32 2 32 2 Y

NE
SUP-68411



SUP-68411


A7Ab7

b7 7A77b
bA7AA7A 7A7

A7A7777777777777777777777777 77A7bbA
7AA7 77 77Ab

Ab7 7
$7 7
7b7 7
77 7
A7 7

7bA7 A7
7A7

7 bb7
7A7Abb
bA7A7Abb

7AA7 bb77 
7A7bA7 
bA7A7 
A7 

77 bb777 7A
7
$7A7bA77
bA7A77

A77
bb777$7
$7bA7
bA7A77$7
A77

A77

Abb7A77
bb77

Abb7A7

bA7 77


b7
b b
b77b

A
A A
A 7b7
777A
77 A7A77
A A

A
b
b

7A77b7A7 A7A7
A A

SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416 and SDR-68410


bb7$77A77 77

AbA7b7b7Ab7 77

7b7777 7A777

A77$A7777A7 77777777777A77

AAA7bAAA7 77777777777A77

Abb

AA7AbAA77AAA7 77777777777A77

A7AbA7AA7 7$77$7

b7b
77A7777A7A7
AA7777A7 b

A7777A77AbbAb777b
$7A7A7$77b777AbA
77bbA77$7A77
77777b7

bA7 77


b7
b77b
b b

A
A A
A 7b7
777A
77 A7A77
A A
A
b
b

7A77b7A7 A7A7
A A

SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416 and SDR-68410


bA7 bA7 77

bA7 bA7 77

bA7 77 bA7


b7
b77b
b b

A
A A
777A
A 7b7
7 A A
A7A77
A
b
b

7A77b7A A7A7
A A

SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416 and SDR-68410


bA7 77


b7
b77b
b b

A
A A
777A
A 7b7
7 A A
A7A77
A
b
b

7A77b7A A7A7
A A

SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416 and SDR-68410


SUP-68411 [PRJ-68190] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416
AND SDR-68410 - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LONE MOUNTAIN ROAD AND CLIFF SHADOWS PARKWAY
01/05/17
SUP-68411 [PRJ-68190] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416
AND SDR-68410 - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LONE MOUNTAIN ROAD AND CLIFF SHADOWS PARKWAY
01/05/17
SUP-68411 [PRJ-68190] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416
AND SDR-68410 - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LONE MOUNTAIN ROAD AND CLIFF SHADOWS PARKWAY
01/05/17
77

b777777
777
777

7777777b777b777777
A7
A777

7777b

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7 b7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7 7 77 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7 7 7
7777A77777 7777
7777777b77

77777777777777
77777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777777<7777777
7777

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 A7 <7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b
7<77

77777777777777777
77777777777

b7A777A
7777A

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7  7

7 A 7 7 A A

7 7 7 A 7A

SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, SUP-68416 and SDR-68410


Agenda Item No.: 11.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68413 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68411 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED SERVICE STATION [CAR WASH AND
GASOLINE SALES] at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows
Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial)
Lone Mountain West Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Comment Form
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SUP-68413



SUP-68413


Agenda Item No.: 12.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68414 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68411 AND SUP-68413 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR PROPOSED BEER SALES at the
southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030),
PD (Planned Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain West Special Land
Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Special Map
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Protest Postcard for SUP-68414 and SUP-68415 [PRJ-68190] and Protest Comment Form for
SUP-68414 [PRJ-68190]
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SUP-68414



SUP-68414


Agenda Item No.: 13.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68415 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68411, SUP-68413 AND SUP-
68414 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR PROPOSED WINE
SALES at the southwest corner of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-
01-101-030), PD (Planned Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain West
Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Special Map
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Protest Comment Form
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SUP-68415



SUP-68415


Agenda Item No.: 14.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68416 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68411, SUP-68413, SUP-68414
AND SUP-68415 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. -
OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR
PROPOSED GAMING (INCIDENTAL GAMING MACHINES ONLY) at the southwest corner
of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned
Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain West Special Land Use
Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Postcard for SUP-68416 and SDR-68410 [PRJ-68190] and Protest Comment Form for
SUP-68416 [PRJ-68190]
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SUP-68416



SUP-68416


Agenda Item No.: 15.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68410 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-68411, SUP-
68413, SUP-68414, SUP-68415, AND SUP-68416 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: CS 4015, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 4,620 SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE
STORE WITH SERVICE STATION [GASOLINE SALES WITH A 3,666 SQUARE-FOOT
CANOPY AND A 1,020 SQUARE-FOOT CAR WASH] on 2.00 acres at the southwest corner
of Lone Mountain Road and Cliff Shadows Parkway (APN 137-01-101-030), PD (Planned
Development) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain West Special Land Use
Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68190]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Comment Form
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SDR-68410



SDR-68410


SDR 68410
Terrible Herbst, Inc.

SWC Lone Mountain Road & Cliff Shadows Parkway


Proposed gas station with 12 fueling positions, convenience store and car wash.

Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 152.84 1,834


GAS/SERVICE W/MARKET & CAR WASH
AM Peak Hour [FUELING POSITIONS]
12 11.84 142
PM Peak Hour 13.86 166

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Cliff Shadows Parkway
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,357
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 109

Lone Mountain Road


Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 678
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 54

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Cliff Shadows Parkway 35,490
Lone Mountain Road 15,600

This project will add approximately 1,834 trips per day on Cliff Shadows Pkwy. and Lone Mountain Rd. Currently, Cliff
Shadows is at about 4 percent of capacity and Lone Mountain is at about 4 percent of capacity. With this project, Cliff
Shadows is expected to be at about 9 percent of capacity and Lone Mountain to be at about 16 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 166 additional cars, or about eleven every four
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Agenda Item No.: 16.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68377 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ESTHER''S
KITCHEN - OWNER: BLVD SERIES 1, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A 2,100 SQUARE-FOOT TAVERN-LIMITED ESTABLISHMENT USE
WITH 600 SQUARE FEET OF OUTDOOR SEATING AREA at 1130 South Casino Center
Boulevard, Suite #110 (APN 162-03-105-006), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3
(Coffin) [PRJ-68374]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 2
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Support Postcards
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ESTHER'S KITCHEN - OWNER: BLVD SERIES
1, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-68377 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 28

NOTICES MAILED 483

APPROVALS 2

PROTESTS 0

FS
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-68377 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Tavern
Limited use.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented
liquors or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining
tables or booths are provided separate from the bar in conformance with Title 6.50.

6. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor
license.

7. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

FS
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for a Special Use Permit for a 2,700 square-foot Tavern Limited at 1130
South Casino Center Boulevard.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required for a Tavern Limited use in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district. Staff recommends approval of the request.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district and the
18b Arts District of the Downtown Centennial Plan. The applicant is requesting a
Special Use Permit for a Tavern-Limited Establishment with 2,100 square feet of interior
floor area and 600 square feet of outdoor seating. The subject property is developed
within an existing multi-tenant building that includes ground level retail and multi-family
apartments on the second floor.

Title 19 Parking Standards are not automatically applied to development projects located
within the Downtown Centennial Plan. If held to Title 19.12 standards, the existing uses on
site would require 98 parking spaces. There is an existing on-site parking lot with 30
parking spaces, as well as ample street parking in the immediate vicinity, which will allow
for adequate parking for the proposed business.

The Tavern-Limited Establishment use is defined as An establishment that is licensed


with a tavern-limited license in accordance with LVMC Chapter 6.50. The proposed use is
located within a mixed use building and is harmonious and compatible with surrounding
land uses. Staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit Request.

FINDINGS (SUP-68377)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

FS
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious


and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed Tavern-Limited is located in the 18b Arts District of the Downtown
Centennial plan and is harmonious and compatible with existing and surrounding
land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed Tavern-Limited.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The site receives access from Casino Center Boulevard, which is adequate in size
to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.

Approval of this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health, safety
welfare, or overall objectives of the General Plan.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The use meets all conditions of Title 19.12.

LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (LVVWD)

This parcel is currently served by the LVVWD, but the domestic and fire services do not
have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing plans will
need to be submitted to the LVVWD for domestic meter sizing, fire flow availability and
backflow retrofit. It should be noted that both the domestic and fire services are located
within the public ROW on California Street.

Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan, all utility structures must be incorporated
within the building footprint, or within underground vaults. They are not permitted along
the street frontage.

FS
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
05/12/15 58547) for a 4,687 square-foot Urban Lounge. Staff had recommended
approval

Most Recent Change of Ownership


07/26/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A Tenant Improvement building permit was issued for Suite #110 on
06/07/16
05/03/16

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held and general Special Use Permit
12/22/16
submittal and Tavern Limited licensing requirements were discussed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required nor was one held.

Field Check
A field check was conducted and the site is a developed with a retail
01/05/16
and multi-family building.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.48

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject Multi-Family; MXU (Mixed Use) C-1 (Limited
Property Retail; Restaurant Commercial)

FS
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
MXU (Mixed Use) C-1 (Limited
North Retail
Commercial)
MXU (Mixed Use) C-1 (Limited
South Undeveloped
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
East Retail MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
C-M (Commercial-
West Retail C (Commercial)
Industrial)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District Y
A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Casino Center
Major Collector Highways Map 47 Y
Blvd.
California Street Collector N/A 47 Y

FS
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Parking Requirement - Downtown


Gross Floor Base Parking Requirement Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Regula Handi- Handi-
Regular
Units r capped capped
1.25
Multi-Family spaces
Residential per unit +
11 16
One 1 guest
Bedroom space per
6 units
1.75
Multi-Family spaces
Residential - per unit+
2 4
Two 1 guest
Bedroom space per
6 units
1 space
Retail 5,750 33
per 175 sf
1:50 sf of
2,038 sf of
seating
Tavern seating area
area and 45
Limited and 662 sf
1:200 for
remainder
remainder
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 98 30 N
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 94 4 28 2 N
Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table should be used to
illustrate the requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.

FS
SUP-68377



SUP-68377


6&$6,12&(17(5%/9'
&2'($1$/<6,6 6,7(,1)250$7,21 9,&,17<0$3 /$69(*$619

352-(&71$0( -85,6',&7,21
&,7<2)/$69(*$6
(67+(5
6.,7&+(1

-85,6',&7,21 =21,1*
/,0,7('&200(5&,$/',675,&7&
&,7<2)/$69(*$6

$66(6625
63$5&(/180%(5
2&&83$1&<&/$66,),&$7,21
&KDSWHU $31 
$ $66(0%/< )22' %(9(5$*(63$&(6
352-(&7$''5(66180%(5
7<3(2)&216758&7,21
6HFWLRQ 6&$6,12&(17(%/9'/$69(*$619
7<3(9%
6,7(63(&,),&6
),5(3527(&7,216<67(06
&KDSWHU $5($ 6)
<(6),5(635,1./(56<67(0672%(,167$//(',1$&&25'$1&(726(&7,21 287'225',1,1* 6)

2&&83$17/2$' 5(48,5('(;,76 727$/%8,/',1*6) 6)

$ $66(0%/< 2&&83$176 5(48,5(' 3529,'(' )/225$5($5$7,2 


(;,76 (;,76
727$/3$5.,1*5(48,5(' 5  %('52203681,7;81,76 36
&2'(6 %('52206 3681,76;81,76 36
*8(673681,7   36
  &RGH<HDUI Type %XLOGLQJ(OHFWULFDO)LUH0HFKDQLFDO3OXPELQJ 5(7$,/ 0   366)6) 36
5(67$85$17 $ 366)2)6($7,1*6),1'2256) 36
,17(51$7,21$/%8,/',1*&2'( ,%& 366)5(0$,1'(5 6)  36
:,7+6287+(511(9$'$$00(1'0(176
727$/3$5.,1*63$&(65(48,5(36
81,)2500(&+$1,&$/&2'( 80& ,$3029(56,21
,1&/8'('$&&(66,%/(3$5.,1*5(48,5('+&
:,7+6287+(511(9$'$$00(1'0(176
81,)2503/80%,1*&2'( 83& ,$3029(56,21
727$/3529,'('36
:,7+6287+(511(9$'$$00(1'0(176
,1&/8'('+&
1$7,21$/(/(&75,&$/&2'( 1(&
3(5'2:172:1&(17(11,$/3/$1 3$5.,1*72%(:$,9('%$576',675,&7
:,7+6287+(511(9$'$$00(1'0(176
,17(51$7,21$/),5(&2'( ,)& $'-$&(173523(57<$31/,0,7('&200(5&,$/',675,&7 &
:,7+6287+(511(9$'$$1'&,7<2)/$69(*$6$00(1'0(176
,17(51$7,21$/(1(5*<&200,66,21&2'( ,(&& 

:,7+6287+(511(9$'$$00(1'0(176 3523(57</,1(
,&&$16, ,&&$16,$ *8,'(/,1(6 3/
8'&7,7/(&,7<2)/$69(*$6

5(48,5('3/80%,1*),;785(6
7$%/(
5HYLVHG7DEOH0LQLPXPQXPEHURIUHTXLUHGSOXPELQJIL[WXUHV

2FFXSDQF\2FFXSDQWORDG:DWHU&ORVHWV/DYDWRULHV%DWKWXEV'ULQNLQJ6HUYLFH
0: 0:RU6KRZHUV)RXQWDLQV6LQN 7+(6('5$:,1*6$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(
7+(3523(57<2))281'$5<,17(5,25
$VVHPEO\ 1$ SHUSHU 1$ SHU5(4 (;,67,1* '(6,*186(2)7+(6('5$:,1*6,6/,0,7('
$ 3$5.,1* 72$63(&,),('352-(&7)253(56216
1$0('+(5(21$1')257+(&216758&7,21
2)21(%8,/',1*$1<86(25
 727$/     1$  5(352'8&7,21,1:+2/(25,13$57%<
$1<0($16:+$762(9(5,6675,&7/<
352+,%,7(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1
3(50,66,212))281'$5<,17(5,25'(6,*1

127(
2&&83$1&<$5(67$85$17
3/ 3/
(;,67,1* 127,1&2175$&7
*$7(
(;,67,1*
*$7(

3523(57</,1(
3523(57</,1(

(;,67,1*
3$5.,1*

+ * ) ( ' & % $
6,7(3/$1



29(5$//
127,1&2175$&7


(67+(5
6.,7&+(1

3$7,2$5($



63(&,$/86($33/,&$7,21
127)25&216758&7,21

$31
(;,67,1*
6&$6,12&(17(5%/9'
6&$6,12&(17(5%/9'68,7(/$69(*$619

6)287'225 /,0,7('&200(5&,$/',675,&7 &



3$7,2',1,1*

3$7,2$5($

'DWH
5HYLVLRQ

3/
3/
3523(57</,1(
5HYLVLRQ'HVFULSWLRQ

5HYLVLRQ6FKHGXOH




29(5$//
C
127,1&2175$&7
127,1&2175$&7
127,1&2175$&7

3/
'5'

$//(<5,*+72):$<
6,'(:$/.
5HYLVLRQ

(;,67,1*
67$,5:$<

3523(57</,1(



127,1&2175$&7

35-
 
(;7(172):25. 3/ 3523(57</,1(
6)7(1$17 6,'(:$/. (;,67,1*:$//
$&&(66,%/( 02817('),5(



,03529(0(17 5287( +<'5$17


6+((7180%(5

(&$/,)251,$675((7
29(5$//6,7(3/$1
 6&$/(  

63
1257+

SUP-68377
7+(6('5$:,1*6$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(
7+(3523(57<2))281'$5<,17(5,25
'(6,*186(2)7+(6('5$:,1*6,6/,0,7('
72$63(&,),('352-(&7)253(56216
1$0('+(5(21$1')257+(&216758&7,21
2)21(%8,/',1*$1<86(25
5(352'8&7,21,1:+2/(25,13$57%<
$1<0($16:+$762(9(5,6675,&7/<
352+,%,7(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1
3(50,66,212))281'$5<,17(5,25'(6,*1

(;,67,1*($67(/(9$7,21 725(0$,1
 6&$/(  

(/(9$7,216
(67+(5
6.,7&+(1
(;,67,1*(;7(5,25
63(&,$/86($33/,&$7,21
127)25&216758&7,21
6&$6,12&(17(5%/9'68,7(/$69(*$619

'DWH
5HYLVLRQ
5HYLVLRQ'HVFULSWLRQ

5HYLVLRQ6FKHGXOH
5HYLVLRQ

35-



6+((7180%(5

(;,67,1*6287+(/(9$7,21 725(0$,1
 6&$/(  
 (/

SUP-68377
+ * )




 


7+(6('5$:,1*6$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(
7+(3523(57<2))281'$5<,17(5,25
'(6,*186(2)7+(6('5$:,1*6,6/,0,7('
72$63(&,),('352-(&7)253(56216
1$0('+(5(21$1')257+(&216758&7,21
2)21(%8,/',1*$1<86(25



5(352'8&7,21,1:+2/(25,13$57%<
$1<0($16:+$762(9(5,6675,&7/<
352+,%,7(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1
3(50,66,212))281'$5<,17(5,25'(6,*1




 
 
 








)/2253/$1

C
(67+(5
6.,7&+(1
63(&,$/86($33/,&$7,21
6&$6,12&(17(5%/9'68,7(/$69(*$619

'5'
'DWH
5HYLVLRQ






5HYLVLRQ'HVFULSWLRQ

5HYLVLRQ6FKHGXOH


5HYLVLRQ

35-

 



6+((7180%(5
)/2253/$1 63(&,$/86(3(50,7
 6&$/(  


1257+
)3

SUP-68377
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: ESTHER'S KITCHEN - OWNER: BLVD SERIES 1,
LLC
1130 SOUTH CASINO CENTER BOULEVARD, SUITE #110
01/05/17
SUP-68377 [PRJ-68374] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: ESTHER'S KITCHEN - OWNER: BLVD SERIES 1,
LLC
1130 SOUTH CASINO CENTER BOULEVARD, SUITE #110
01/05/17
777
b777
7
777
777

-bA7
7
A
7b7b777777

777777777777777
777b7b777777777777
7777777777777777
7777777777777777
77777777777

777777777777777-77
7>777-77777777777777-
77777777777777777
777777777777777
777777777b7A777777
77777777777777777
777-77777-7777777
7777777777777
7777777>7777>
b77777>77777777b77
A77777>777777777A77
7777777777777777
777

7777777-7777777

>7

-777b7
77b7b77
777



SUP-68377
Agenda Item No.: 17.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68263 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: DOWNTOWN CAC, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64815) FOR
A PROPOSED 302 SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION TO A PROPOSED 2,180 SQUARE-FOOT
RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE-THROUGH AND A 384 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR
DINING AREA on 0.50 acres at the southwest corner of Clark Avenue and Casino Center
Boulevard (APN 139-34-302-009), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-
68086]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DOWNTOWN CAC, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-68263 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 34

NOTICES MAILED 502

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-68263 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan Review


(SDR-64815) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan
date stamped 01/12/17; and building elevations date stamped 12/21/16, except as
amended by conditions herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,


Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device. The
applicant shall work with the Planning staff to replace the two northern-most trees
along the Transit Station Street with appropriate shade trees.

7. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Public Works

9. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this
site prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.

10. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

11. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for SDR-
64815 and all other applicable site-related actions.

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-64815) for a proposed 302 square-foot addition to a proposed 2,180
square-foot restaurant with a drive-thru on 0.50 acres at the southwest corner of Clark
Avenue and Casino Center Boulevard.

ISSUES

Per the Downtown Centennial Plan Area Threshold requirements, the proposed 302
square-foot addition represents a modification to an existing structure resulting in net
floor area expansion exceeding 10% or 5,000 SF (whichever is less) of floor area of
the existing structure and requires a Major Site Development Plan review.
The applicant has also proposed a new trash enclosure location
The southern landscape buffer landscape buffer has been reduced from 10 feet to
six feet to allow a better turning radius within the Drive-Through Aisle.
There are no proposed alterations to the proposed streetscape design.

ANALYSIS

On August 17th, 2016 the City Council approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
64815). This entitlement approved a 2,180 square-foot Restaurant with a Drive-Through
and a 687 square-foot outdoor dining area with a Waiver of the Downtown Centennial
Plan Setback Standards on the subject site.

The applicant has proposed a 302 square-foot expansion represents a 13% increase
from the previously approved 2,180 square-foot Restaurant with a Drive-Through. As
the proposed expansion exceeds 10% of the previously approved floor area on the
subject site, a Major Amendment is required for Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
64815). The submitted drawings indicate the 302 square feet of floor area will be added
to the western perimeter of the proposed building, in an area that was previously
approved as an outdoor dining area, resulting in a reduction in outdoor dining space
from 687 square feet to 384 square-feet.

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

In addition, the applicant has proposed a new location for the proposed trash enclosure,
which relocates the enclosure from the northern perimeter of the proposed building to a
new centralized location within the parking lot. The relocation of the trash enclosure
resulted in the removal of one parking space from the previously approved 16 parking
spaces associated with approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64815) leaving
15 total parking spaces. Also, the southern landscape buffer has been reduced from ten
feet to six feet to allow a wider turning radius within the Drive-Through Aisle.
Furthermore, the applicant has also requested to remove six 36-box Chilean Mesquite
trees which were previously approved on the northern and northwestern portion of the
subject site and replace them with palm trees so as not to obstruct visibility. Shade trees
would be preferred for the two tree locations at the northern tip of the site for an
established plaza area; a condition has been added to address this concern.

This project will continue to have a positive visual effect to the surrounding
neighborhood and will provide additional retail and restaurant opportunities that are all
pedestrian accessible. This project is well designed and appropriate for the location.
Staff recommends approval, with conditions.

FINDINGS (SDR-68263)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed commercial development is located in the Downtown Centennial


Plan overlay and will serve as a restaurant use that is complementary to the other
restaurants and general retail uses in the neighborhood and is the type of use that
is encouraged in the Downtown Overlay District.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

This project is consistent with the General Plan and the uses allowed in the
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District. However, it is not consistent with the
building setback and standards in the Downtown Centennial Plan.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Site access is provided from Casino Center Boulevard and Clark Avenue, which
are Major Collector streets as designated in the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways. These streets are sufficient in size to accommodate the needs of the
proposed use.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

The building will be constructed with a corniced metal roof line with a Timber
Wolf (light grey) finish. The building faade will incorporate a combination of white
washed brick veneer with a Timber Ash glazed porcelain tile building facade.
The submitted building elevations indicate all rooftop mechanical equipment has
been shielded from view by the roof parapet and that metal canopies will be
provided above the main entrance to the building.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The proposed building elevations have been designed with articulated roof lines
and materials to prevent blank and expressionless walls. All roof mounted
mechanical equipment has been screened from view using parapet walls.
However, it is not consistent with the building setback standards in the Downtown
Centennial Plan. A Waiver to allow zero percent of the first story faade to align
with the front property line was approved with Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-64815).

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed development is subject to permit review and inspection; therefore,


appropriate measures will be taken to protect the health, safety and general
welfare.

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0100-64) from R-1 (Single
Family Residential), R-4 (High Density Residential), C-1 (Limited
Commercial), C-2 (General Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2
(General Commercial) for approximately 230 Acres generally located
12/16/64
on property bounded by Main Street to the west, Bonanza Road on the
north, Las Vegas Boulevard on the east, and Charleston Boulevard on
the south, Wards 1 and 3. The Planning Commission recommended
approval on 12/10/64.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-10451) for a 32-story Residential Building with 20,850
square feet of Commercial Space; a 25-story Office Building with
9,995 square feet of Commercial Space; and Waivers of the
Downtown Centennial Plan building placement standards; the
Downtown Centennial Plan Streetscape; and Downtown Centennial
Plan Step Back requirements at 501 thru 529 South First Street; 108
and 122 Clark Avenue; and 508 thru 514 South Casino Center
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended
approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
02/15/06
10452) for a proposed Mixed Use Development for a 32-story building
and a 25-story building at 501 thru 529 South First Street; 108 and 122
Clark Avenue; and 508 thru 514 South Casino Center Boulevard. The
Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the
request.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
10453) for a proposed Mixed Use Development for a 405 foot building
in the Airport Overlay District at 501 thru 529 South First Street; 108
and 122 Clark Avenue; and 508 thru 514 South Casino Center
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended
approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-64815) for a proposed 2,180 square-foot Restaurant
with a Drive-Through and a 687 square-foot outdoor dining area with a
08/17/16 Waiver of the Downtown Centennial Plan Setback Standards at the
southwest corner of Clark Avenue and Casino Center Boulevard. The
Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the
request.

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/24/15 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no related Building Permits/Business Licenses associated with this site.

Pre-Application Meeting
A meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal process
and procedures for a Major Amendment to approved Site
12/08/16
Development Plan Review (SDR-64815) for a proposed 302 square-
foot expansion to a proposed Restaurant with a Drive-Through use.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not held, nor was one required.

Field Check
Staff visited the site and found an undeveloped pad with trash and
01/05/17
debris scattered throughout the site.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.50

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C-2 (General
Undeveloped C (Commercial)
Property Commercial)
North Parking Lot PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Multi-Family C-2 (General
South C (Commercial)
Residential Commercial)
East Parking Lot PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
C-2 (General
West Undeveloped C (Commercial)
Commercial)

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (Office Core District) Y
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front (east) 70% along Property Line 0% Y*
Side (north) N/A 120 Feet Y
Side (south) N/A 22 Feet Y
Rear (west) N/A 37 Feet Y
Screened,
Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a a Roof or
Roof or Trellis Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y
*The applicant requested a Waiver to allow zero percent of the first story faade to align
with the front property line with the previously approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-64815).

Pursuant to Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64815), the following standards


apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet 2 Trees 0 Trees Y
South 1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet 7 Trees 7 Trees Y
East 1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet 0 Trees 0 Trees Y
West 1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet 6 Trees 8 Trees Y

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Landscaping and Open Space Standards


Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 15 Trees 15 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North 0 Feet 0 Feet Y
South 10 Feet 6 Feet Y
East 0 Feet 0 Feet Y
West 0 Feet 0 Feet Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 8 Feet Y

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Casino Center
Major Collector Streets and 80 Y
Boulevard
Highways
Master Plan of
Clark Avenue Major Collector Streets and 45 N
Highways

Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance


Five-foot wide amenity N*
Zero Feet
zone
10-foot wide sidewalk Five Feet N*
36-inch box trees at 15
Downtown Centennial Plan
to 20 feet intervals 7 Trees on Casino
along Casino Center Center Boulevard N*
Boulevard and Clark (existing/proposed)
Avenue
*A covenant running with the land will be required to obtain the property owners
consent for future improvements.

JB
SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Parking Requirement - Downtown


Gross Floor Base Parking Requirement Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
2,482 SF
(1,350 1:50 SF
indoor and of
seating & seating
Restaurant
1,132 SF area plus
with Drive 41
gross 1:200 of
Through
remaining) remainin
w/ g floor
Outdoor area
patio 384 SF
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 41 15 Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 39 2 14 1 Y*
*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to
the automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table should be
used to illustrate the requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.

JB
SDR-68263



SDR-68263


45'*# -2 /#-1*
 5''56
#7- 78-39( '(
+'&*:3+*45:9
6+'&*:5'*95( )
*57;*

7
b7.A
7 bAb77.77b7A7.77.7A7bAb777bb
77b


A

  < < 7
77

bAb77bA7777Ab777bb7A7b7


bAb7A7b.77777b77A7A7
777A7
 7 

A77A7AA77bb 7b.77
A7A7
bA7A7AA
A7A7Abb7A7A7777A777A7b A7777b7
A7A
.77AbA7A7.7A7AbA7A7A7A7A7A77A 7AA7
777bA7
A7AA
.7A7.7Abb77A7A7A777b7A

Ab7AA7bA
.77bA7bb7A77.77A77b77A7bAb AbA7A7 b777
7Abb777b777 77A
A7.77A
7A7A
A7AbA7AA77b77.777A7A77.7A 7A7
7
77.7A
.7A77Abb7AA77b7A77A7777 7b7AA

77
7; 7

A7bA7.7777777A7777b7.7A7A Ab7AA7bA
77.7A
b777
bA 7b7AA

7 A7A77A77A.Ab7bA77b7A7.777b7  $%
Abb7 AbA7A7
77A
A7.77A
7A7A 1 8##

   7
7A7 ( ++'*/%%1;
77bA7.7AA7A
 ( '(
A7AA #7- 78-39( &3

+'&*49)*4)( (
A7A77bA  &( >* 
Ab7A 7b7A
7
bAb7bA

A7A7bb7A
77b7b.7b

A7.77Abb7
AbA7A7
77A 77
A7.77A 7b.77
7A7A A7A7
7 bA7A7AA
A7777b7
A7A
77 7AA7
7b.77 777bA

A7A7
bA7A7AA
7A7
A7777b7
77.7A
A7A
7b7AA
7AA7
777bA bb7 A7 A
77 7
7A77 - !
A7A
Ab7A77b7A

A77777A
bA

b7A7b7
A77b7A7A b7AA
AA.77b
A7.7A

.77A7A

A77b7A7A
AA.77b
A7.7A

Ab7AA7bA
b777
&( 3'
39( '(
-2 

7
- 1

/0$#1$2

7A77bA
 /0,

77.7A
7b7AA
-2 8

7A77
.##
6
( &&*# , -
# 
$?6# 

 !"# $


A77
bA
7A7
AbA7A7
77A
A7.77A
7A7A
7
7A7
77.7A
7b7AA
77A


7.Ab777A


7b77b7 &'( )*''+
  
77


*@*

1*/*
  

1*/*




 


 

 

A
A7777A7
7b7b77b77777
b
7777777777

7777777777

77777777777

77777777

SDR-68263 - REVISED

SDR-68263 - REVISED
45'*# -2 /#-1*
 5''56
#7- 78-39( '(
+'&*:3+*45:9
6+'&*:5'*95( )
*57;*



  < < 7
77

 7 

7
7; 7

AA7
bA7


 $%

A7 A7

bb7

A7
1 8##

A7bA7
bA

bA7
7

.7AAb7
A7
77

b A7
( ++'*/%%1;

7
77

A 7

A 7

 ( '(


7777
bA777
7777

..A7
A #7- 78-39( &3

7 +'&*49)*4)( (
AA77 AA7 A

7
AA77


 &( >* 


A77 A7

7
A77 A7.b

7

A

77
b7 A



A7A

7
A

A77777
bb7
Ab7 bA7 A

A7A7A

A7
A7A7

A7 7 7 A

AA7
b
A7 A



7
AA

A
AA77

A7777

AA7

A

bA7 - !
bA77



A7

Ab
A7
AAA7A7 AAA777777777777A

77

bA

AA7
A A7777

A7

A
A

AA
777

7
bA7
b7A

A7b
&( 3'
39( '(
-2 
- 1

/0$#1$2
 /0,
-2 8

.##
6
( &&*# , -
# 
$?6# 

 !"# $

&'( )*''+
  
.77


*@*

b
A7
1*/*
  

1*/*




 


 





7

7b7b77b77777
7777777777

7777777777

77777777777

77777777

SDR-68263 - REVISED

SDR-68263 - REVISED
45'*# -2 /#-1*
 5''56
#7- 78-39( '(
+'&*:3+*45:9
6+'&*:5'*95( )
*57;*

A7A7A73
7A77
377
A7A7A73 37
7A77
377 7b77A7A7bA
7A7A7A7
7377b777


77A
AbA77777

  < < 7
77

A73


7A777
A A73
7A777 3777A
 7 

7A7A7 A3

A7A A A A A A A73
37A A77A737A
7A73Ab7b
A77
7bA7bA A77b77
A77737
Ab7b 7
7A777 7b777A7
A77bA7
7 A73

7A73Ab7b
7; 7

7b7bA7A
37A bb77377bbA
A  $%

7A77A7A777 7AbbA7A777 7AbbA7A77


1 8##
( ++'*/%%1;
7  ( '(
#7- 78-39( &3
+'&*49)*4)( (
A73  &( >* 
73737b

A7A7A73
7A77 7A7A7A7
377 77A

7bA7bA


A

37
- !
7A73Ab7b7

37

A7bb7A7

7A73Ab7b

A7A7A73
7A77
&( 3'

A7A7A73 377
7A77
37
39( '(

A73

-2 
- 1

/0$#1$2


A
A7A7A73
 /0,

7A77
-2 8

377

377 A A
.##
6
( &&*# , -
# 
$?6# 

 !"# $


A73
7A777 7bA7bA

377 7

77

77
A7
7
7A77
A77A7

7A73Ab7b

bb7AA7 7 A

777

&'( )*''+
  
377


*@*

1*/*
  

1*/*




 


 




A
7b7b77b77777
7777777777
7777777777
77777777777
77777777

77A
SDR-68263

SDR-68263
45'*# -2 /#-1*
 5''56
#7- 78-39( '(
+'&*:3+*45:9
6+'&*:5'*95( )
A77A7 *57;*

A77A773Ab73777777

77A7737737737b7A737A
7bA7A7


377b7A737A73737A73A

  < < 7
77


377bAbA7A737A7A7A7A7A7b
7bA7A7
 7 

377bbA7A737A77777A7bbA7
bA7A7

3777A737A7AA737A7377A
A7777A77bA7A7

A7777A7777A7A7377 77A

377A77b7A7A7377A77A

A7A777A7A
7; 7

 $%

1 8##
( ++'*/%%1;
 ( '(
#7- 78-39( &3
+'&*49)*4)( (
 &( >* 


b
7 - !

A7
&( 3'
39( '(
-2 
- 1

/0$#1$2
 /0,
-2 8

.##
6
( &&*# , -
# 
$?6# 

 !"# $

7
A7b7 A7b7 A7b

A7b
A7b
A7b
737
7 7 7
7 777 777
7
77A7
A 777 A7
A7 73Ab7bA
7 A737
A7777A
&'( )*''+
  
377


77
*@*

1*/*
  

1*/*


7 7


 

737
7
7AAb
7A77
377A7A7 
 




A
7b7b77b77777
7777777777
7777777777
77777777777
77777777

77A

SDR-68263


7b

77b777 777A7b777A777777777%777777
777777777777

777 77 777777A7777777A777777777777777777777Ab7777777777
Ab
77

SDR-68263


A7b

77b777 777A7b777A777777777%777777
777777777777

777 77 777777A7777777A777777777777777777777Ab7777777777
Ab
77

SDR-68263


A7b

77b777 777A7b777A777777777%777777
777777777777

777 77 777777A7777777A777777777777777777777Ab7777777777
Ab
77

SDR-68263


7b

77b777 777A7b777A777777777%777777
777777777777

777 77 777777A7777777A777777777777777777777Ab7777777777
Ab
77

SDR-68263

7A
77b777 777A7b777A777777777%777777
777777777777

777 77 777777A7777777A777777777777777777777Ab7777777777
Ab
77

SDR-68263
SDR 68263
Downtown CAC, LLC

SWC Clark Avenue & Casino Center Boulevard


Proposed 0.302 thousand square foot expansion of an approved 2.18 thousand square foot fast food restaurant.

Approved Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 496.12 1,082


FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
AM Peak Hour SF]
2.18 45.42 99
PM Peak Hour 32.65 71

Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 496.12 150


FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
AM Peak Hour SF]
0.302 45.42 14
PM Peak Hour 32.65 10

Total Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 496.12 1,232


FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
AM Peak Hour SF]
2.482 45.42 113
PM Peak Hour 32.65 81

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Clark Avenue
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,050
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 244

Casino Center Boulevard


Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,850
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 308

Bonneville Avenue
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,200
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 416

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Clark Avenue 30,540
Casino Center Boulevard 15,600
Bonneville Avenue 30,540

This project will add approximately 150 trips per day on Clark Ave., Casino Center Blvd. and Bonneville Ave. Currently,
Clark is at about 10 percent of capacity, Casino Center is at about 25 percent of capacity and Bonneville is at about 17
percent of capacity. With this project, Clark is expected to be unchanged, Casino Center is expected to be at about 26
percent of capacity and Bonneville to be at about 18 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 14 additional cars, or about one every four
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

SDR-68263 [PRJ-68086] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: DOWNTOWN CAC, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CLARK AVENUE AND CASINO CENTER BOULEVARD
01/05/17
7 7

7A7777777777777 77b7A7777
A777777 77777777777777777777777 777
b7777777777777777b7b77777b

77777777777777777777777777777777777777

777bAb7b777777A7777
7A77777 77777#777
7A#7AA77777777777b1
A77b7b77A7 7777777#

A777777777777777
777717777777777777777
7777777777777777777
77777777777
7777777777771777777
7 777

77777777b7b7777
7b777

7777777

777
77
77b7777
777

SDR-68263
Agenda Item No.: 18.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAC-68294 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMHAR
HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 70-foot public
drainage easement located at the northeast corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way (APN
138-12-801-016), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-67601]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMHAR HOLDINGS, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAC-68294 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 13

NOTICES MAILED 113

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

JB
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAC-68294 CONDITIONS

1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the 70-foot wide Public Drainage
Easement granted per Parcel Map 89, Page 85.

2. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and


approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of the Order
of Vacation for this application. An appropriate Public Drainage Easement shall be
granted along an alternative alignment if recommended by the approved Drainage
Plan/Study. The drainage study required by SDR-64072/56167 may be used to
satisfy this requirement provided that it addresses the area to be vacated. We
note that this site is within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Flood Zone A.

3. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation
application are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the
recordation of an Order of Vacation.

4. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval
have been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of public
improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient
security for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance
of the City of Las Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if
necessary because of technical concerns or because of other related review
actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still complied with and
the intent of the vacation application is not changed. If applicable, a five foot wide
easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all
vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will remain dedicated and
available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public easement
corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any right-
of-way or easement being vacated must be retained.

5. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design


standards of all City Departments.

6. If the Order of Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the
City of Las Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director,
then approval will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.

JB
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to vacate City of Las Vegas drainage easements generally
located at the northeast corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way. As the sewer and
drainage easements are no longer needed in this current configuration, staff
recommends approval. If denied, the existing drainage easements would remain.

ISSUES

The reason for the vacation is that the site is being developed per Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-56167) and (SDR-64072) for a proposed Car Wash, Full Service
or Auto Detailing use on the subject site.
The Department of Public Works has indicated that the Drainage Easement in
question will be relocated.

ANALYSIS

This application requests that the City of Las Vegas relinquish its interest in a 70-foot
wide drainage easement associated with assessors Parcel Number 138-12-801-016,
generally located on northeast corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way. The
drainage for the site has changed and this recorded easement is no longer required. It
is noted that this request is in relation to the proposed Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-56167) and (SDR-64072) for a proposed Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing
use on the subject site, which was previously approved.

As no right-of-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved,


it is not necessary to send this Vacation request to the utility companies and franchise
holders, nor wait for their responses. Since only City easements are involved, any utility
company interests will need to be addressed with each respective utility company and
will not be affected by the City vacating its interest. Furthermore, we recommend that
this item be declared final action at Planning Commission.

FINDINGS (VAC-68294)

This Vacation application proposes to vacate an existing 70-foot wide public drainage
easement. As no right-of-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights
are involved, it is not necessary to send this Vacation request to the utility companies

JB
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

and franchise holders, nor wait for their responses. Since only a City easement is
involved; any utility company interests will not be affected. Staff has no objection to the
Vacation of this public drainage easement, as the easement is no longer needed. Staff
recommends approval with conditions.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Planning Commission approved a request for Annexation (A-
04/28/64 0002-64) of property generally located east of Tonopah Highway,
south of Craig Road and west of Decatur Boulevard.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment denied a request for a Variance (V-
0084-97) to allow a second freestanding sign of 60 square feet in
10/07/97 conjunction with a proposed fast food restaurant where only one
freestanding sign is allowed on property located on the northwest
corner of Cheyenne Ave and Rancho Drive.
The Planning Department administratively approved a request for a
Site Development Plan Review (SD-0019-97) to allow a proposed
10/08/97 2,478 square-foot fast food restaurant with drive- thru on property
located on the west side of Rancho Drive approximately 300 feet north
of Cheyenne Ave.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-
0009-99) for the sale of packaged liquor for off-premise consumption
04/12/99
in conjunction with a proposed supermarket on this site. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time [U-0009-99(1)] of an
approved Special Use Permit (U-0009-99) for the sale of packaged
06/07/00 liquor for off-premise consumption in conjunction with a proposed
supermarket on the northeast corner of the intersection of Cheyenne
Avenue and Joann Way.
The Planning Commission denied a Site Development Plan Review
(SD-0079-01) for a proposed 4,050 square-foot Used Motor Vehicle
02/14/02
Dealership on 1.36 acres, located adjacent to the northeast corner of
Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-
0159-01) for Used Motor Vehicle Sales located adjacent to the
03/20/02
northeast corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way. The Planning
Commission recommended denial of the request 02/14/02

JB
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved the Site Development Plan Review (SD-
0079-01) for a proposed 4,050 square-foot Used Motor Vehicle
04/17/02 Dealership on 1.36 acres, located adjacent to the northeast corner of
Cheyenne Avenue and Joann Way. The Planning Commission
recommended denial of the request 02/14/02
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-23554) for a proposed 11,000 square-foot retail
development with waivers to allow no landscape buffer along the north
09/13/07 and east property line where eight feet is required and to allow a ten-
foot landscape buffer along the west property line where 15 feet is
required on 1.36 acres at the northeast corner of Joann Way and
Cheyenne Avenue. Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-56167) for a proposed 6,100 square-foot Car Wash, Full
Service or Auto Detailing with Waivers to allow a zero-foot landscape
12/17/14 buffer along the east property line where eight feet is required and
zero-foot landscape buffer along the west property line where fifteen
feet is required at the northeast corner of Joann Way and Cheyenne
Avenue.
The Department of Planning approved a request for a Minor Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-64072) a Minor Amendment of a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-56167) for
04/27/16 a proposed 1,386 square-foot addition to a proposed 6,100 square-
foot Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing with revised building
elevations and parking lot reconfiguration at the northeast corner of
Joann Way and Cheyenne Avenue.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


03/31/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A code enforcement case (#15879) was opened on the site as it is
06/02/04
being used as a dumping ground. The case was resolved on 06/09/04.
A code enforcement case (#45065) was opened to check for weeds,
08/01/06
trash and debris. The case was resolved on 08/29/06.

JB
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pre-Application Meeting
A Pre-Application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over
11/02/16 the application materials and submittal requirements for a Vacation of
a drainage easement.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required for this type of request, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine site inspection staff noticed the subject site is
01/05/17 undeveloped with overgrown weeds growing and debris scattered
throughout the property.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 1.36

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject GC (General C-2 (General
Undeveloped
Property Commercial) Commercial)
Auto Repair GC (General C-2 (General
North
Garage, Major Commercial) Commercial)
General
C-2 (General
Retail/Auto Repair
SC (Service Commercial)
South Garage, Minor
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Car Wash
Commercial)
GC (General C-2 (General
East Restaurants
Commercial) Commercial)
Multi-Family M (Medium Density R-4 (High Density
West
Residential Residential) Residential)

JB
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (35 Feet and 70 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

A portion of the southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of the southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of Section
12, Township 20 South, range 60 east, M.D.M., City of Las Vegas, Clark County,
Nevada, more particularly described as follows:

The west seventy (70') feet of parcel three (3) as shown by parcel map on file: as map
89 of parcel maps, page 85 as recorded September 04, 1997 as document no, 01391 of
official records, in the office of the County Recorder, Clark County Nevada.

JB
VAC-68294



VAC-68294

VAC-68294


VAC-68294

VAC-68294

VAC-68294

VAC-68294

VAC-68294

VAC-68294
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601] - VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMHAR HOLDINGS, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CHEYENNE AVENUE AND JOANN WAY
01/05/17
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601] - VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMHAR HOLDINGS, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CHEYENNE AVENUE AND JOANN WAY
01/05/17
VAC-68294 [PRJ-67601] - VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMHAR HOLDINGS, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CHEYENNE AVENUE AND JOANN WAY
01/05/17
VAC-68294

Agenda Item No.: 19.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAC-68343 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF
NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: SUMMIT CENTENNIAL, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located at the northwest
corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way (APN 126-24-401-016), Ward 6 (Ross)
[PRJ-68270]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER:
SUMMIT CENTENNIAL, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAC-68343 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 18

NOTICES MAILED 14

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

SS
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAC-68343 CONDITIONS
1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the U.S. Government Patent
Easements located on Assessor Parcel Number 126-24-401-016 at the northwest
corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way.

2. Per Condition of Approval #7 of TMP-66459, this Petition of Vacation shall record


concurrent with the Final Map for this site.

3. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and


approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of the Order
of Relinquishment for this application. Appropriate drainage easements shall be
reserved if recommended by the approved Drainage Plan/Study. The drainage
study required by TMP-66459 may be used to satisfy this requirement provided
that it addresses the area to be vacated.

4. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation
application are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the
recordation of an Order of Vacation.

5. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design


standards of all City Departments.

6. The Order of Relinquishment of Interest shall not be recorded until all of the
conditions of approval have been met provided, however, the conditions requiring
modification of public improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by
providing sufficient security for the performance thereof in accordance with the
Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Las Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify
this application if necessary because of technical concerns or because of other
related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still
complied with and the intent of the vacation application is not changed. If
applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant
purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors
that will remain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and
where needed, public easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements
that would/should cross any right-of-way being vacated must be retained.

7. If the Order of Relinquishment of Interest is not recorded within one (1) year after
approval by the City of Las Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the
Planning Director, then approval will terminate and a new petition must be
submitted.

SS
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements in conflict


with a proposed 22-lot single family residential development at the northwest corner of
Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way.

ANALYSIS

The site was recently rezoned and approved for a 22-lot single family residential
development and the easements are no longer needed. Portions of Alpine Ridge Way
and Centennial Parkway will be dedicated for rights-of-way and are therefore excepted
from the vacation request. Staff therefore recommends approval, subject to conditions.

FINDINGS (VAC-68343)

The Department of Public Works has no objection to the vacation application request to
relinquish the City's interests in U.S. Government Patent Reservations generally located
at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way. This Vacation
request should be sent to all the utilities; however, as no right-of-way is proposed to be
vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary to wait for
responses from any of the public utilities or other parties interested in preserving a right
in this patent easement. Since only City interests are involved, any utility company's
interests will need to be addressed with each respective utility company and will not be
affected by the City relinquishing its interest.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved the Annexation (ANX-64386) of 4.78 acres
07/20/16 at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way.
The annexation became effective 07/28/16.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-66455)
from R (Rural Density Residential) to L (Low Density Residential) on
11/16/16 4.78 acres at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine
Ridge Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.

SS
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a Rezoning (GPA-66456) from U
(Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan
Designation] to R-SL (Residential Small Lot) on 4.78 acres at the
northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-66457) to allow a
Connectivity Ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 is required on 4.78 acres at the
northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Waiver (WVR-66636) to allow a 182-foot
external intersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum separation
required for a proposed single family residential subdivision on 4.78
acres at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge
Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-66459)
for a 22-lot single family residential subdivision on 4.78 acres at the
northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way (a 23rd
lot was changed to open space per the final drawings). The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council voted to strike a request for a Waiver (WVR-67096)
to allow no streetlights along Alpine Ridge Way and on the interior of a
proposed 22-lot single family residential subdivision on 4.79 acres at
01/18/17 the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Alpine Ridge Way.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the interior
streetlights, but denial of the streetlights on Alpine Ridge Way; staff
recommended denial.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/30/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no related building permits or business licenses.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss
12/21/16 submittal requirements for a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government
Patent Easements. There were no issues prior to application.

SS
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
The site is undeveloped. Alpine Ridge Way is not improved north of
Centennial Parkway, but serves as an access road to the property to
01/05/17
the north. Centennial Parkway is not improved on the north side of the
street centerline adjacent to this site.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Gross Acres 4.79

Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special Existing Zoning
Use Per Title
Property Land Use Designation District
19.12
Subject L (Low Density R-SL (Residential Small
Undeveloped
Property Residential) Lot)
CC 215 ROW (Right-of-Way) ROW (Right-of-Way)
PCD (Planned
North PD (Planned
Undeveloped Community
Development)
Development)
RNP (Rural
Single Family, R-D (Single Family
South Neighborhood
Detached Residential-Restricted)
Preservation)
Public School PR-OS
East (partially (Parks/Recreation/Open C-V (Civic)
undeveloped) Space)
Wireless
RL (Residential Low) R-U (Rural Open Land)
Communication
West Clark County Clark County
Facility, Stealth
Designation Designation
Design

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A

SS
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance


Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification
N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Centennial
Primary Arterial Streets and 50 N
Parkway
Highways Map
Alpine Ridge N/A
Minor Street Title 13.12 N/A
Way (proposed 30)

SS
VAC-68343



VAC-68343

VAC-68343
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270] - VACATION - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: SUMMIT
CENTENNIAL, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND ALPINE RIDGE WAY
01/05/17
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270] - VACATION - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: SUMMIT
CENTENNIAL, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND ALPINE RIDGE WAY
01/05/17
VAC-68343 [PRJ-68270] - VACATION - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: SUMMIT
CENTENNIAL, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND ALPINE RIDGE WAY
01/05/17

VAC-68343
Agenda Item No.: 20.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SDR-66170 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: NIM MEISHAR - OWNER: B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0102-73) FOR A
WAIVER OF TITLE 19.08 LANDSCAPING IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS on 2.34 acres
located at 4600 Meadows Lane (APN 139-31-110-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward
1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-65854]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 03/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Protest/Support Postcards
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: - APPLICANT: NIM MEISHAR - OWNER: B-Y LOMA VISTA,
LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-66170 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 23

NOTICES MAILED 147

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 1

JB
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-66170 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Plot Plan Review (Z-0102-73) shall
be required, if approved, except as amended herein.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan
date stamped 08/09/16, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow no irrigation system.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

JB
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review for a Waiver of Title 19.08
landscape irrigation requirement for the proposed removal of the required underground
irrigation system at 4600 Meadows Lane.

ISSUES

This request is a result of Code Enforcement Case (#158579), which was processed
on 08/19/15 for landscape plants dying at rear of property along with parking islands
located at 4600 Meadows Lane. The case has not been resolved.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is currently developed as a shopping center within the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district. The applicant has indicated in the submitted justification
letter that the previous tenants of the shopping center were engaged in a form of
Homeowners Association, with former tenant (Mervyns) acting as the management
company. Each of the entities paid Mervyns its fair share of expenses. Currently,
ownership of the involved entities has changed and the association has been dissolved,
causing an interruption in utility service. At this time the subject property does not have
a water irrigation meter, nor does it have the old irrigation system to tap into, which
makes watering the small landscape finger islands difficult. The applicant has proposed
to install drought-resistant landscape materials, which will be hand watered for a period
of 12 months to ensure establishment of the root system.

The primary plant species utilized for landscaping is the five-gallon Desert Broom, five-
gallon Princes Plume and five-gallon Red Yucca shrubs, none of which are native
pursuant to the Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant List. An
Exception of plant materials is required to use the proposed shrubs in lieu of the
required trees. Staff believes the proposed species will not survive without a functioning,
in-ground irrigation system. Native landscape requires years of supplemental irrigation
to establish within the urbanized area, especially with the prolonged drought that
southern Nevada has been experiencing, and staff feels that any plant material installed
without irrigation will be guaranteed to perish. Plot Plan Review (Z-0102-73) required
landscape with a functional, in-ground irrigation system, which the supporting property
owners failed to maintain. As the current conditions are self-imposed and could be
resolved through the willingness of the property owner to install a functioning irrigation

JB
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

system, staff has determined the proposed project is not compatible with surrounding
development in the area, as demonstrated by the associated Waiver. Therefore, staff
recommends denial of this request with conditions.

FINDINGS (SDR-66170)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposal to waive Title 19.08 landscape irrigation requirements is not


compatible with the adjacent residential and commercial development in the
area. Staff has determined that the proposed species will not survive without a
functioning, in-ground irrigation system, which will have an overall negative
impact to the area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposal to waive Title 19.08 landscape irrigation requirements is not


consistent with the Title 19. Staff has determined the associated waiver will have a
negative impact to the overall development.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Primary site access is from Meadows Lane, a 60-foot wide Local Street. The right-
of-way provides adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

The project design and style are not appropriate for the subject location and will
not be harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The primary plant
species utilized for landscaping are the five-gallon Desert Brooms, five-gallon
Princes Plumes and five-gallon Red Yucca shrubs, none of which are native
pursuant to the Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant List. The
proposed species will not survive without a functioning, in-ground irrigation
system; staff recommends denial of this request.

JB
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

There are no structures proposed with this request, the design characteristics of
the proposed parking lot improvements are not compatible with development in
the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed development will be subject to inspections in order to protect the


public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Board of City Commissioners approved the Plot Plan Review (Z-
12/28/77 0102-73) for a Commercial Development on property located at the
northeast corner of Decatur Boulevard and Meadows Lane
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SU-
16947) for a proposed Off-Premise Advertising Sign (Billboard) at
12/06/06
4600 Meadows Lane. The Planning Commission recommended denial
and Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Required Review (RQR-
12/17/08 31290) of a Special Use Permit (SUP-16947) for a 14 foot x 48 foot
Off-Premise Sign (Billboard) at 4600 Meadows Lane.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use
Permit (SUP-39219) for a proposed 25,062 square-foot Thrift Shop,
09/23/10
non-profit within an existing building at 4600 Meadows Lane. Staff
recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Required Review (RQR-
44098) of a Special Use Permit (SUP-16947) for a 14 foot x 48 foot
Off-Premise Sign (Billboard) at 4600 Meadows Lane.
04/18/12 The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-43991) to establish Redevelopment Area 2 and change the
future land use designation on various parcels within the
redevelopment area to commercial or mixed use.

JB
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Review of Condition (ROC-
54821) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-16947) to delete
condition #1 which states "The billboard face shall consist of static
vinyl panels or a similar material as approved by the planning and
08/06/14
development department" and to delete condition #2 which states
"Animated and electronic message unit signage and digital signage is
prohibited" at 4600 Meadows Lane. Staff recommended denial of the
request.
The Planning Department administratively approved a request for a
Minor Site Development Plan Review (SDR-57102) for the conversion
12/23/14 of an existing 40-foot tall, 14-foot by 48-foot off-premise sign to a
digital display units (LED) on the east and west side located at 4600
Meadows Lane.
The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to hold SDR-66170 in abeyance
10/11/16
to the December 13, 2016 Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to hold SDR-66170 in abeyance
12/13/16
to the February 14, 2017 Planning Commission meeting.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


05/02/13 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A Code Enforcement case (#29586) was processed for graffiti on a
05/04/05 building located at 4600 Meadows Lane. The case was resolved on
05/17/05.
A Code Enforcement case (#39874) was processed for dumpster at
Sav-on is full, has not been emptied since they moved, trash blowing
04/05/06
all around located at 4600 Meadows Lane. The case was resolved on
04/12/06
A Code Enforcement case (#73835) was processed for trash, graffiti
01/16/09 and landscaping violations on a building located at 4600 Meadows
Lane. The case was resolved on 02/10/09.
A Code Enforcement case (#97235) was processed for illegal banner
signs on rear of building, trash and debris in rear parking/landscaped
01/11/11
area located at 4600 Meadows Lane. The case was resolved on
02/08/11.
A Code Enforcement case (#110105) was processed for graffiti on the
02/01/12 back of a building located at 4600 Meadows Lane. The case was
resolved on 02/15/12.
A Code Enforcement case (#119475) was processed for graffiti on a
09/11/12 building located at 4600 Meadows Lane. The case was resolved on
10/10/12.

JB
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A Code Enforcement case (#134252) was processed for demolition
10/19/13 and construction on site without permits at 4600 Meadows Lane. The
case was resolved on 10/29/13.
A Code Enforcement case (#135957) was processed for graffiti on on
12/05/13 a trailer that is parked behind the Melrose store located at 4600
Meadows Lane. The case was resolved on 12/05/13.
A Code Enforcement case (#158579) was processed for landscape
08/19/15 plants dying at rear of property along with parking islands located at
4600 Meadows Lane. The case has not been resolved.
A Code Enforcement case (#165499) was processed for an unlicensed
04/13/16 mobile car wash, most days located at 4600 Meadows Lane. The case
was resolved on 05/19/16.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application conference was held with the applicant to discuss
07/26/16 submittal requirements for a Site Development Plan Review with a
Waiver to eliminate the required irrigation system.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine site inspection staff observed a commercial
development with all planting materials removed from the landscape
finger-islands in the front parking lot area. In addition, the majority of
09/01/16
planting materials have also been removed from the northern
landscape buffer adjacent to Interstate-95 throughout the
development.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 2.34

JB
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C-1 (Limited
Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Commercial)
North Interstate 95 ROW (Right of Way) ROW (Right of Way)
Single Family L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
Residential Residential) Residential)
South
SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Landscape Buffer
Commercial) Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
East Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
West Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (140 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Plot Plan Review (Z-0102-73), the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 2 Trees 2 Trees Y

TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 2 Trees 2 Trees Y


1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
7 Trees 0 Trees N
Trees end of each row of
spaces

JB
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Landscaping and Open Space Standards


Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
Not Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Indicated

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Master Plan of Streets
Meadows Lane Local Street 75 Y
& Highways

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To remove the
Title 19.08 landscape
required irrigation Denial
irrigation requirements
system.

Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
Landscape Finger islands To utilize a
are required to have one 24- combination of 5- Denial
box tree and four shrubs gallon shrubs only

JB
SDR-66170



CLV Planning - Application Form
Application Number: PRJ-65854

Application/Petition For: 4600 Meadows Mall - underground irrigation removal - Major SDR Amendment

ProjectAddress (Location): 4600 MEADOWS MALL

Project Name 4600 MEADOWS MALL - UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION REMOVAL

Assessors Parcel #(s): 13931110002

Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN)

Is the Application Information Yes


Correct:
If no, ...change what

General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select

Zoning District: Proposed: Select

Gross Acres:

Lots/Units:

Additional Information:

Applicant First Name: Nim

Applicant Last Name: Meishar

Applicant Address: 4629 Macro

Applicant City: San Antonio

Applicant State: TX

Applicant Zip: 78218

Applicant Phone: (210) 424-8078

Applicant Fax: (210) 424-8078

Applicant Email: nim@cbgcre.com

Rep First Name: Joe

Rep Last Name: Smatana

Rep Address: 3975 West Dewey Drive

Rep City: Las Vegas

Rep State: NV

Rep Zip: 89118

Rep Phone: (702) 429-5488

Rep Fax:

Rep Email: js@nlsgrounds.com

SDR-66170
9/1/2016 3:55:43 PM Page 1 of 2
CLV Planning - Application Form
I certify that I am the applicant and Yes
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Is the Owner Information Correct: No

If no, ...change what B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC


4629 MACRO
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218

Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2


B-Y LOMA VISTA L L C P O BOX 790830 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78279

CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email


Nim Meishar B-Y Loma Vista, LLC Director of Operations nim@cbgcre.com

SDR-66170
9/1/2016 3:55:43 PM Page 2 of 2

SDR-66170

SDR-66170
SDR-66170

SDR-66170




SDR-66170

SDR-66170

SDR-66170
SDR-66170


SDR-66170

SDR-66170
SDR-66170

SDR-66170

SDR-66170
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: NIM MEISHAR - OWNER:
B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC
4600 MEADOWS LANE
09/01/16
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: NIM MEISHAR - OWNER:
B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC
4600 MEADOWS LANE
09/01/16
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: NIM MEISHAR - OWNER:
B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC
4600 MEADOWS LANE
09/01/16
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: NIM MEISHAR - OWNER:
B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC
4600 MEADOWS LANE
09/01/16
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: NIM MEISHAR - OWNER:
B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC
4600 MEADOWS LANE
09/01/16
SDR-66170 [PRJ-65854] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: NIM MEISHAR - OWNER:
B-Y LOMA VISTA, LLC
4600 MEADOWS LANE
09/01/16
777b
77
7A77

A77

b77777

7777777777A767AbA7

7777

777777777777777777
777777777777777
7777A7777777777
77777777777777777
7A777

77777777777777777
7777>777A7777777777
777777777777777777777
77A7777777777

777b7777777777777
777777777777777
777777777777
777777777777777777
7777777777777777
7777777777777777777
77

777b7777b7777777777
77777

7
77



SDR-66170
:

c;

City ol Las Vegas PR{RT


Departmenl of Planning FIRS CISSMAIL
fleveloment S ervices Cen ter U.S. Fogaoe
g3 Noih Racho Drive, 3d Floor PIO-
ls Vsgar. I'lV
Ls$ Vegas, Nevada 89106 Prmlt N0. f630

Return Servlce Requested RECEIVED


Official Notice of Publc Ilearing
OcT I 7 2016
City of Las Vegas
FUtrt Dept. of Planning

If you wish file your pmtest or suPporL on this request, check tle
appropriate box below and rehrn this crd in an envelope with postage to the
case: sDs6170
Departmenl of Plarming at [he address iisd above, fax thi.q sde of this card to rggg6s14o1g
at www.Isvegasnevada.gov. If you MARGISON FOBERT L JH REV TR
pf ease call Q02) 229 -64{5 MAGISON ROBERT L TRS
= 23OO PEARL CFEST ST
L$VEGAS NV 89134-6732
ISUPPORT IOPPOSE
;i this Request this Request
Please use available blank card for your cofiunets.
SDR.66L70 [PRJ-658541
Planning Comrnission Meeting of 10/l 1/2016 1lt,l,Ht.,,llltl,ltil ll,ltrh,i,+,tI,'tlll,,
r.: .ii:;:t:ii::ri..ii::,.i. iij,: I ..,.i ll tlll'tl,'11il,
;

27
Agenda Item No.: 21.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - GPA-68385 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
General Plan Amendment FROM: PR-OS (PARKS/RECREATION/OPEN SPACE) TO: L
(LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 166.99 acres at the southeast corner of Alta Drive and
Hualapai Way (APN 138-31-702-002), Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-67184]. Staff has NO
RECOMMENDATION.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 45 Planning Commission Mtg. 14
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Staff Report - GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
3. Supporting Documentation- GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-
67184]
4. Photo(s) - GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
5. Justification Letter
6. Protest/Support Postcards
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: - APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-68385 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
WVR-68480 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-68385
GPA-68385
SDR-68481 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
WVR-68480
GPA-68385
TMP-68482 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: WVR-68480
SDR-68481

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 32

NOTICES MAILED 1019 - GPA-68385


253 - WVR-68480 and SDR-68481
253 - TMP-68482

APPROVALS 14 - GPA-68385
0 - WVR-68480 and SDR-68481
0 - TMP-68482

PROTESTS 45 - GPA-68385
3 - WVR-68480 and SDR-68481
3 - TMP-68482

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

WVR-68480 CONDITIONS
Planning

1. Approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA-68385) and approval of and


conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-68481) and Tentative Map (TMP-68482) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-68481 CONDITIONS
Planning

1. Approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA-68385) and approval of and


conformance to the Conditions of Approval for a Waiver (WVR-68480) and
Tentative Map (TMP-68482) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, date stamped 01/25/17
and landscape plan, date stamped 01/26/17, except as amended by conditions
herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

6. The standards for this development shall include the following:

Standard Lots less than or Lots greater


equal to 20,000 sf* than 20,000 sf
Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sf 20,000 sf
Building Setbacks:
Front yard to private street or 30 feet 35 feet
access easement
Side yard 5 feet 7.5 feet
Corner side yard 12.5 feet 15 feet
Rear yard 25 feet 30 feet

Standard Lots less than or Lots greater


equal to 20,000 sf* than 20,000 sf
Accessory structure setbacks:
Porte cochere to private street 15 feet 15 feet
Side loaded garage to side yard 15 feet 15 feet
property line
Patio covers and/or 2nd story decks 20 feet 20 feet
Separation from principal dwelling 6 feet 6 feet
Side yard 5 feet 5 feet
Corner side yard 5 feet 5 feet
Rear yard 5 feet 5 feet
Building Heights:
Principal dwelling 40 feet 50 feet
Accessory structures 25 feet 30 feet
Floors 2 stories on slab or 3 stories on lots
over basement greater than
35,000 sf;
otherwise 2
stories
Permitted uses Single family Single family
residence and residence and
accessory accessory
structures* structures*
*Includes Lots 1, 2 and 24.
**Accessory structures may have a trellis or canopy attached to the principal
dwelling.

7. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,


Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time as Final Map submittal. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.
SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]

Conditions Page Three


February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

8. No turf shall be permitted in the non-recreational common areas, such as medians


and amenity zones in this development.

9. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

11. Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the public
sidewalks adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title
13.56.040, if any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with
development of this site.

12. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire
Services to discuss fire requirements for the proposed subdivision. The design
and layout of all onsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the
approval of the Department of Fire Services. Curbing on one side of the 32-foot
private streets shall be constructed of red concrete and shall be in accordance with
the adopted Fire Code (Ordinance #6325). The required curb coloring, painting,
and signage shall be privately maintained in perpetuity by the Homeowners
Association.

13. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

14. Coordinate with the Sewer Planning Section of the Department of Public Works to
determine the appropriate location and depth of public sewer lines servicing this
site prior to approval of construction drawings for this site. Provide appropriate
Public Sewer Easements for all public sewers not located within existing public
street right-of-way. Construct paved vehicular access to all new Public Sewer
Manholes proposed east of this site concurrent with on-site development activities.
No structures, and no trees or vegetation taller than three feet shall be allowed
within any Public Sewer Easements.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Conditions Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

15. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building
or grading permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved
drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended
by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site. The Drainage Study required
by TMP-68482 may be used to satisfy this condition.

16. Site Development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for TMP-
68482 and any other site related actions.

TMP-68482 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final
Map is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map
within four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. Approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA-68385) and approval of and


conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Waiver (WVR-68480) and Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-68481) shall be required, if approved.

3. Street names must be provided in accordance with the Citys Street Naming
Regulations.

4. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-


interest community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and
Restrictions (CC&R), or conveyance of any unit within the community, the
Developer is required to record a Declaration of Private Maintenance
Requirements (DPMR) as a covenant on all associated properties, and on behalf
of all current and future property owners. The DPMR is to include a listing of all
privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements, along with
assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest
community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Conditions Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained


components. The DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas
Department of Field Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement
that all properties within the community are subject to assessment for all
associated costs should private maintenance obligations not be met, and the City
of Las Vegas be required to provide for said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to
include a statement of obligation of compliance with the DPMR. Following
recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded DPMR and CC&R
documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.

6. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State


Subdivision Statutes.

Public Works

7. Grant all required public easements (sewer, drainage, fire, etc.) that are outside
the boundaries of this site prior to or concurrent with the recordation of a Final Map
for this site.

8. Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the public
sidewalks adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title
13.56.040, if any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with
development of this site.

9. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public
Utility Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage
Easements to be privately maintained by the Homeowner's Association.

10. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire
Services to discuss fire requirements for the proposed subdivision. The design
and layout of all onsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the
approval of the Department of Fire Services. Curbing on one side of the 32-foot
private streets shall be constructed of red concrete and shall be in accordance with
the adopted Fire Code (Ordinance #6325). The required curb coloring, painting,
and signage shall be privately maintained in perpetuity by the Homeowners
Association.

11. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Conditions Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

12. Coordinate with the Sewer Planning Section of the Department of Public Works to
determine the appropriate location and depth of public sewer lines servicing this
site prior to approval of construction drawings for this site. Provide appropriate
Public Sewer Easements for all public sewers not located within existing public
street right-of-way. Construct paved vehicular access to all new Public Sewer
Manholes proposed east of this site concurrent with on-site development activities.
No structures, and no trees or vegetation taller than three feet, shall be allowed
within any Public Sewer Easements.

13. A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of
any units within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major
access streets, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall
and adjacent public street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to
issuance of any building permits beyond 50% of all units within this development.
All off-site improvements adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped
areas between the perimeter walls and adjacent public streets, shall be
constructed and accepted prior to issuance of building permits beyond 75%. The
above thresholds notwithstanding, all required improvements shall be constructed
in accordance with the Title 19.

14. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building
or grading permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved
drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended
by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

15. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative
Map is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size,
type and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer
and drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction
plans by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed
unless specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to
the recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision-related construction
plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does not
constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a
revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.
We note that curved sewers are not allowed and do not comply with City
Standards.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing a 61-lot gated single-family residential development on a


portion of a large lot currently developed as a golf course generally located at the
southeast corner of Alta Drive and Hualapai Way. The development would feature
custom homes and contain small open space and park areas.

ISSUES

A General Plan Amendment is requested from PR-OS (Parks/Recreation/Open


Space) to L (Low Density Residential) on the primary parcel (that makes up the
Badlands Golf Course.
A Waiver of Title 19.02 is requested to allow 32-foot wide private streets with a
private sidewalk and landscape easement on one side and another landscape
easement on the other side where 47-foot wide streets including sidewalks on both
sides are required within a proposed gated development. Staff supports this
request.
A Site Development Plan Review for a single-family residential development on this
site is required for all planned developments zoned R-PD (Residential Planned
Development). The proposal includes developer-proposed standards for
development of the site.
A Tentative Map is requested for a 61-lot single-family residential subdivision on a
34.07-acre parcel, which is a portion of the primary golf course parcel that is the
subject of the proposed General Plan Amendment.
A Parcel Map (PMP-64285) dividing the majority of the Badlands Golf Course into
four separate lots, including a 34.07-acre lot at the southeast corner of Alta Drive
and Hualapai Way that defines the extent of the proposed residential development,
was recorded on 01/24/17. Although Assessors Parcel Numbers have not yet been
assigned, recordation of the Parcel Map has created four legal lots with valid legal
descriptions.

ANALYSIS

The subject parent parcel (APN 138-31-702-002) is a significant portion of a developed


golf course that is located within the Peccole Ranch Master Plan. The parcel is zoned
R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development 7 Units per Acre), allowing up to 7.49
dwelling units per acre spread out across the zoning district. The proposed L (Low
Density Residential) General Plan designation allows density up to 5.49 dwelling units
per acre, which is consistent with the density permitted by the existing R-PD7

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

zoning across the Peccole Ranch Master Plan area. The approved 1990 Peccole
Ranch Master Plan indicates that the subject area is planned for both single family
residential and golf course/open space/drainage uses. Over time, the development
pattern in this area did not follow the master plan as approved.

Title 19.16.110 states that except as otherwise authorized by this Title, approval of all
Maps, Vacations, Rezonings, Site Development Plan Reviews, Special Use Permits,
Variances, Waivers, Exceptions, Deviations and Development Agreements shall be
consistent with the spirit and intent of the General Plan. Within the area known as the
Peccole Ranch Master Plan, the 1992 General Plan for the City of Las Vegas designated
the proposed golf course area P (Parks/Recreation/Open Space) and the various
residential areas around the proposed golf course as ML (Medium Low Density
Residential). As other uses within the Peccole Ranch Master Plan were proposed that
deviated from the established General Plan or zoning, a General Plan Amendment or
Rezoning was required for consistency with the General Plan. As the proposed land area
is no longer intended for a golf course or open space, but instead for residential
development, an amendment to the General Plan is necessary and appropriate.

As a Residential Planned Development, density may be concentrated in some areas while


other areas remain less dense, as long as the overall density for this site does not exceed
7.49 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, portions of the subject area can be restricted in
density by various General Plan designations. A closer examination of the existing
development reveals that single-family lots adjacent to the golf course average 12,261
square feet and a density of 3.55 units per acre along Queen Charlotte Drive west of
Regents Park Road, an average of 11,844 square feet and a density of 3.68 units per
acre along Verlaine Court and an average of 42,806 square feet and a density of 1.02
units per acre along Orient Express Court west of Regents Park Road. Each of these
adjacent developments are designated ML (Medium Low Density Residential) with a
density cap of 8.49 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development would have a
density of 1.79 dwelling units per acre, with an average lot size of 19,871 square feet.
In addition, open space and planned park areas are included as required for all new R-
PD developments. Compared with the densities and General Plan designations of the
adjacent residential development, the proposed L (Low Density Residential) designation
is less dense and therefore appropriate for this area, capped at 5.49 units per acre.

Open space is provided in the form of three small park areas totaling approximately
62,000 square feet. Approximately 44,000 square feet or 1.01 acres of the
development must consist of usable open space, which this proposal meets. An eight-
foot buffer and six-foot wrought iron fence would separate the proposed D Avenue
from Orient Express Court to the south. These areas are all common lots to be privately
maintained.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Title 19.04 requires private streets to be developed to public street standards, which
require 47-foot wide streets with sidewalks on both sides of the street, as well as either
a three-foot amenity zone with street trees or a five-foot planting zone on the adjacent
private properties. This is to allow adequate space for vehicular travel in both
directions, as well as a safe environment for pedestrians, bicycles and other modes of
transportation. In the existing adjacent residential developments, the streets range in
size from 36 feet to 40 feet in width with wide roll curbs. In addition, the San Michelle
North development abutting this site to the north also contains a four-foot sidewalk, six-
foot amenity zone and three-foot landscape strip within a common element on the north
side of Queen Charlotte Drive. The side streets in that development contain the 36-foot
private roadway with a four-foot sidewalk and five-foot amenity zone on one side
contained in a private easement for a total sectional width of 45 feet.

The applicant is requesting a street section comparable to San Michelle North, with
proposed 32-foot private streets with 30-inch roll curbs, a four-foot sidewalk and three-
foot private landscape easement on one side and a five-foot private landscape
easement on the other side for a total sectional width of 44 feet. A 32-foot wide street
will allow for emergency vehicle access while still permitting parking on one side. Red
colored concrete and signage will be required to clearly mark the side of the street with
no parking. This design is comparable to the private streets in the adjacent gated
subdivisions along the golf course. Staff can support the Waiver request with conditions
that include a requirement for the applicant to coordinate with the Fire Protection
Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to discuss the design and layout
of all onsite private circulation and access drives to meet current fire codes.

The Site Development Plan Review describes two lot types with different development
standards; those that contain 20,000 square feet or less and those containing greater
than 20,000 square feet. However, three lots (Lots 1, 2 and 24) are included with the
20,000 square feet or less classification for consistency of development. Development
standards for lots that are 20,000 square feet or less are generally consistent with R-D
zoned properties, while those in the category greater than 20,000 square feet are
generally consistent with R-E zoned properties. Some exceptions include building
height, which is proposed to be 40-50 feet where 35 feet is the requirement in the
standard zoning districts, and patio covers, which are treated the same as second story
decks unlike in the Unified Development Code. The additional height is comparable to
existing residential dwellings in the R-PD7 zoning district. It is noted that no building
height restriction was conditioned for the existing residential development surrounding
the subject property.

The submitted Tentative Map contains the elements necessary for a complete submittal.
The natural slope from west to east across the site is approximately 2.5 percent. Per
Title 19, a development having a natural slope of greater than two percent is allowed to
contain up to six-foot retaining walls and eight-foot screen walls on the perimeter, with a
maximum height of 12 feet. A 10-foot combined perimeter wall consisting of no more

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

than six feet of retaining is proposed along Hualapai Way, set back 20 feet from the
property line. Only the screen wall would be visible from Hualapai Way. A six-foot
screen wall or fence is proposed on the east perimeter at Regents Park Road.

The submitted north-south cross section depicts maximum natural grade at two percent
across this site. Per Title 19, a development with natural slope of two percent or greater
is allowed to contain up to six-foot retaining walls and eight-foot screen walls on the
perimeter, with a maximum height of 12 feet. The retaining walls along the northern
property line are shown as maximum six-foot retaining walls, with a maximum of 10 feet
of both retaining and screening. From the adjacent properties, no more than 10 feet of
wall or wrought iron fencing would be visible.

Per Title 19.04.040, the Connectivity Ratio requirement does not apply for R-PD
developments. In addition, per Title 19.04.010, where a proposed development is
adjacent to existing improvements, the Director of Public Works has the right to
determine the appropriateness of implementing Complete Streets standards, including
connectivity. In this case, Public Works has determined that it would be inappropriate to
implement the connectivity standards, given the design of the existing residential
development and configuration of available land for development.

FINDINGS (GPA-68385)

Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following
conditions be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is


compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The density of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible with the
existing adjacent land use designations, which include ML (Medium Low Density
Residential), MLA (Medium Low Attached Density Residential) and PR-OS
(Parks/Recreation/Open Space); the L (Low Density Residential) designation is
less dense than any of these residential land use designations. However, as a
Residential Planned Development, density may be concentrated in some areas
while other areas remain less dense.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be


compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

The overall residential development, including the proposed site and surrounding
adjacent residential development, is zoned R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development 7 Units per Acre), which is allowed by the proposed
amendment. Additionally, the zoning districts allowed by the proposed L (Low
Density Residential) designation would be less dense than the existing R-PD7
zoning district.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to


accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General
Plan Amendment; and

Additional streets, utilities and open space amenities would be constructed or


extended to support the residential uses permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment to L (Low Density Residential).

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and


policies that include approved neighborhood plans.

The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the Peccole Ranch
Master Plan, which designates the subject area for single family residential uses.

FINDINGS (WVR-68480)

Staff supports Title 19 requirements for streets within the city, which require private
streets to be developed to public street standards. The Unified Development Code
requires 47-foot wide private streets that contain sidewalks on both sides. However,
none of the existing residential developments with private streets in this area adhere to
this standard. The applicant is proposing streets that provide similar amenities and
widths to the adjacent private streets, once private easements are granted. This
configuration would be more compatible with the surrounding development than the
required 47-foot streets. Build-out of the proposed streets will not cause an undue
hardship to the surrounding properties and will allow for fire access and limited on-street
parking. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested waiver, with
conditions.

FINDINGS (SDR-68481)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed residential lots throughout the subject site are comparable in size to
the existing residential lots directly adjacent to the proposed lots. The
development standards proposed are compatible with those imposed on the
adjacent lots. Several small park and open space amenities are provided for the
benefit of residents.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development would be consistent with the General Plan if the plan
is concurrently amended to L (Low Density Residential) or a lower density
designation. The proposal for single-family residential and accessory uses is
consistent with the approved 1990 Peccole Ranch Master Plan, which designates
the subject area for single family uses. The proposed R-PD development is
consistent with Title 19 requirements for residential planned developments prior to
the adoption of the Unified Development Code. However, streets are not
designed to public street standards as required by the Unified Development Code
Title 19.04, for which a waiver is necessary.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Site access is proposed from Hualapai Way through a gate that meets Uniform
Standard Drawing specifications. The street system does not connect to any
existing streets and therefore should not negatively affect traffic within the existing
residential areas.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

Custom homes are proposed on the subject lots, which will be subject to future
permit review. Landscape materials are drought tolerant and appropriate for this
area.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Custom homes are proposed on the subject lots, which will be subject to future
permit review against the proposed development standards.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

Development of this site will be subject to building permit review and inspection,
thereby protecting the public health, safety and general welfare.

FINDINGS (TMP-68482)

The submitted Tentative Map is in conformance with all Title 19 and NRS requirements
for tentative maps.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The Board of City Commissioners approved the Annexation (A-0018-
80) of 2,243 acres bounded by Sahara Avenue on the south, Hualapai
12/17/80
Way on the west, Ducharme Avenue on the north and Durango Drive
on the east. The annexation became effective on 12/26/80.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a General Plan
Amendment (Agenda Item IX.B) to expand the Suburban Residential
Land Use category and add the Rural Density Residential category
generally located north of Sahara Avenue, west of Durango Drive.
04/15/81 The Board of City Commissioners approved a Generalized Land Use
Plan (Agenda Item IX.C) for residential, commercial and public facility
uses on the Peccole property and the south portion of Angel Park lying
within city limits. The maximum density of this plan was 24 dwelling
units per acre.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0034-81)
from N-U (Non-Urban) to R-1 (Single Family Residence), R-2 (Two
Family Residence), R-3 (Limited Multiple Residence), R-MHP
(Residential Mobile Home Park), R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development), R-PD8 (Residential Planned Development), P-R
05/20/81
(Professional Offices and Parking), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2
(General Commercial) and C-V (Civic) generally located north of
Sahara Avenue, south of Westcliff Drive and extending two miles west
of Durango Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved the Master Development Plan for Venetian
Foothills on 1,923 acres generally located north of Sahara Avenue
between Durango Drive and Hualapai Way. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval. This plan included two
18-hole golf courses and a 106-acre regional shopping center.
[Venetian Foothills Master Development Plan]
05/07/86 The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0030-86) to reclassify
property from N-U (Non-Urban) (under Resolution of Intent) to R-PD4
(Residential Planned Development), P-R (Professional Offices and
Parking), C-1 (Limited Commercial), and C-V (Civic) on 585.00 acres
generally located north of Sahara Avenue between Durango Drive and
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. [Venetian Foothills Phase One]

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council considered and approved a revised master
development plan for the subject site and renamed it Peccole Ranch to
include 1,716.30 acres. Phase One of the Plan is generally located
south of Charleston Boulevard, west of Fort Apache Road. Phase
Two of the Plan is generally located north of Charleston Boulevard,
02/15/89
west of Durango Drive, and south of Charleston Boulevard, east of
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. A condition of approval limited the maximum number of
dwelling units in Phase One to 3,150. [Peccole Ranch Master
Development Plan]
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0139-88) on 448.80 acres
from N-U (Non-Urban) under Resolution of Intent to R-PD4, P-R, C-1
02/15/89 and C-V to R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development 7 Units per
Acre), R-3 (Limited Multiple Residence) and C-1 (Limited Commercial).
[Peccole Ranch Phase One]
The City Council approved an amendment to the Peccole Ranch
Master Development Plan to make changes related to Phase Two of
the Plan and to reduce the overall acreage to 1,569.60 acres.
Approximately 212 acres of land in Phase Two was planned for a golf
course. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
[Peccole Ranch Master Development Plan]
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0017-90) from N-U (Non-
Urban) (under Resolution of Intent to multiple zoning districts) to R-3
04/04/90
(Limited Multiple Residence), R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development 7 Units per Acre) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) on
996.40 acres on the east side of Hualapai Way, west of Durango
Drive, between the south boundary of Angel Park and Sahara Avenue.
A condition of approval limited the maximum number of dwelling units
for Phase Two of the Peccole Ranch Master Development Plan to
4,247 units. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. [Peccole Ranch Phase Two]
A (Parent) Final Map (FM-0008-96) for a 16-lot subdivision (Peccole
West) on 570.47 acres at the northeast corner of Charleston
12/05/96
Boulevard and Hualapai Way was recorded [Book 77 Page 23 of
Plats]. The golf course was located on Lot 5 of this map.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development
Plan Review [Z-0017-90(20)] for a proposed 76-lot single family
08/14/97
residential development on 36.30 acres south of Alta Drive, east of
Hualapai Way. Staff recommended approval.
A Final Map (FM-0190-96) for a four-lot subdivision (Peccole West Lot
03/30/98 10) on 184.01 acres at the southeast corner of Alta Drive and Hualapai
Way was recorded [Book 83 Page 61 of Plats].

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Ten
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


A Final Map [FM-0008-96(1)] to amend portions of Lots 5 and 10 of the
Peccole West Subdivision Map on 368.81 acres at the northeast
03/30/98
corner of Charleston Boulevard and Hualapai Way was recorded
[Book 83 Page 57 of Plats].
A Final Map (FM-0027-98) for a 45-lot single family residential
subdivision (San Michelle North) on 17.41 acres generally located
10/19/98
south of Alta Drive, east of Hualapai Way was recorded [Book 86 Page
74 of Plats].
A Final Map (FM-0158-97) for a 21-lot single family residential
subdivision (Peccole West Parcel 20) on 20.65 acres generally
12/17/98
located south of Alta Drive, east of Hualapai Way was recorded [Book
87 Page 54 of Plats].
A Final Map (FM-0157-97) for a 41-lot single family residential
subdivision (Peccole West Parcel 19) on 15.10 acres generally
09/23/99
located south of Alta Drive, east of Hualapai Way was recorded [Book
91 Page 47 of Plats].
A four-lot Parcel Map (PMP-59572) on 250.92 acres at the southwest
06/18/15 corner of Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard was recorded [Book 120
Page 49 of Parcel Maps].
A two-lot Parcel Map (PMP-62257) on 70.52 acres at the southwest
11/30/15 corner of Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard was recorded [Book 120
Page 91 of Parcel Maps].
The Planning Commission voted [6-0] to hold requests for a General
Plan Amendment (GPA-62387) from PR-OS (Parks/Recreation/Open
Space) to H (High Density Residential), a Rezoning (ZON-62392) from
R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development 7 Units per Acre) to R-4
01/12/16
(High Density Residential) and a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-62393) for a proposed 720-unit multi-family residential
development in abeyance to the March 8, 2016 Planning Commission
meeting at the request of the applicant.
The Planning Commission voted [7-0] to hold GPA-62387, ZON-62392
03/08/16 and SDR-62393 in abeyance to the April 12, 2016 Planning
Commission meeting at the request of the applicant.
A two-lot Parcel Map (PMP-63468) on 53.03 acres at the southwest
03/15/16 corner of Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard was recorded [Book 121
Page 12 of Parcel Maps].
The Planning Commission voted [7-0] to hold GPA-62387, ZON-62392
04/12/16 and SDR-62393 in abeyance to the May 10, 2016 Planning
Commission meeting at the request of the applicant.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Eleven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The Planning Commission voted [7-0] to hold requests for a Major
Modification (MOD-63600) of the 1990 Peccole Ranch Master Plan; a
Development Agreement (DIR-63602) between 180 Land Co., LLC, et
al. and the City of Las Vegas; a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
63599) from PR-OS (Parks/Recreation/Open Space) to DR (Desert
04/12/16 Rural Density Residential) and H (High Density Residential); and a
Rezoning (ZON-62392) from R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development 7 Units per Acre) to R-E (Residence Estates) and R-4
(High Density Residential) on 250.92 acres at the southwest corner of
Alta Drive and Rampart Boulevard in abeyance to the May 10, 2016
Planning Commission meeting at the request of the applicant.
The Planning Commission voted [7-0] to hold GPA-62387, ZON-62392
and SDR-62393 in abeyance to the July 12, 2016 Planning
Commission meeting at the request of City staff.
05/10/16
The Planning Commission voted [7-0] to hold MOD-63600, GPA-
63599, ZON-63601 and DIR-63602 in abeyance to the July 12, 2016
Planning Commission meeting at the request of City staff.
The Planning Commission voted [5-2] to hold GPA-62387, ZON-62392
and SDR-62393 in abeyance to the October 11, 2016 Planning
Commission meeting.
07/12/16
The Planning Commission voted [5-2] to hold MOD-63600, GPA-
63599, ZON-63601 and DIR-63602 in abeyance to the October 11,
2016 Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission voted [7-0] to rescind the action taken on
07/12/16 to hold GPA-62387, ZON-62392 and SDR-62393 in
08/09/16 abeyance to the October 11, 2016 Planning Commission meeting.
Action was then taken to reschedule the hearing of these items at a
special Planning Commission meeting on 10/18/16.
The Planning Commission voted [7-0] to rescind the action taken on
07/12/16 to hold MOD-63600, GPA-63599, ZON-63601 and DIR-
63602 in abeyance to the October 11, 2016 Planning Commission
08/09/16
meeting. Action was then taken to reschedule the hearing of these
items at a special Planning Commission meeting on 10/18/16, at which
they were recommended for denial.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Twelve
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


At the applicants request, the City Council voted to Withdraw Without
Prejudice requests for a Major Modification (MOD-63600) of the 1990
Peccole Ranch Master Plan; a Development Agreement (DIR-63602)
between 180 Land Co., LLC, et al. and the City of Las Vegas; a
General Plan Amendment (GPA-63599) from PR-OS
(Parks/Recreation/Open Space) to DR (Desert Rural Density
Residential) and H (High Density Residential); and a Rezoning (ZON-
62392) from R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development 7 Units per
Acre) to R-E (Residence Estates) and R-4 (High Density Residential)
on 250.92 acres at the southwest corner of Alta Drive and Rampart
Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended denial; staff
11/16/16
recommended approval.
The Planning Commission voted to hold in abeyance to the January
18, 2017 City Council meeting a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
62387) from PR-OS (Parks/Recreation/Open Space) to H (High
Density Residential), a Rezoning (ZON-62392) from R-PD7
(Residential Planned Development 7 Units per Acre) to R-4 (High
Density Residential) and a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
62393) for a proposed 720-unit multi-family residential development on
17.49 acres at the southwest corner of Alta Drive and Rampart
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The Planning Commission voted to hold in abeyance to the February
01/10/17
14, 2017 Planning Commission meeting GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184].
The City Council voted to hold in abeyance to the February 15, 2017
01/18/17 City Council meeting GPA-62387, ZON-62392 and SDR-62393 at the
applicants request.
A four-lot Parcel Map (PMP-64285) on 166.99 acres at the southeast
01/24/17 corner of Alta Drive and Hualapai Way was recorded [File 121 Page
100 of Parcel Maps].

Most Recent Change of Ownership


A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on APN 138-31-702-
11/16/15
002.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no building permits or business licenses relevant to these requests.

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held to discuss submittal requirements
for Site Development Plan Review and Tentative Map applications.
The applicant proposed 30-foot wide private streets with 30-inch roll
curbs. Staff indicated that a Waiver would be necessary to deviate
09/29/16 from public street standards. There was concern that the long and
narrow streets would come into conflict with fire codes and that the
applicant should work with staff to address these issues. In addition,
the applicant was advised that a parcel map currently in review would
need to be recorded prior to these items being notified for hearing.
The requirement for a General Plan Amendment and neighborhood
12/06/16
meeting was added to the original submittal checklist.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was held at the Badlands Golf Course
Clubhouse at 9119 Alta Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada. Approximately 50
members of the public were in attendance, as well as seven members
of the development team, one City Council Ward staff member and
one Department of Planning staff member.

01/09/17 The applicant set up display boards showing the proposed General
Plan Amendment. At sign in, neighbors were given a handout
describing the request, which noted that the item had been requested
to be abeyed to the February 14, 2017 Planning Commission meeting.
No formal presentation was given; instead, members of the public
were invited to examine the request and approach development team
members with any questions.

Field Check
The site contains a well-maintained golf course surrounded by existing
01/05/17
single-family residential dwellings.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres (GPA) 166.99
Net Acres
34.07
(WVR/SDR/TMP)

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Fourteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Surrounding Existing Land Use Planned or Special Existing Zoning


Property Per Title 19.12 Land Use Designation District
Commercial R-PD7 (Residential
PR-OS
Subject Recreation/Amusement Planned
(Parks/Recreation/Open
Property (Outdoor) Golf Development 7
Space)
Course Units per Acre)
Multi-Family
Residential GTC (General Tourist PD (Planned
(Condominiums) / Club Commercial) Development)
House
Hotel/Casino
SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Office, Medical or
Commercial) Commercial)
Dental
R-PD7 (Residential
North
ML (Medium Low Planned
Density Residential) Development 7
Units per Acre)
Single Family,
R-PD10
Detached
MLA (Medium Low (Residential
Attached Density Planned
Residential) Development 10
Units per Acre)
Office, Other Than SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Listed Commercial) Commercial)
R-PD7 (Residential
Single Family, ML (Medium Low Planned
Detached Density Residential) Development 7
Units per Acre)
South R-PD10
(Residential
Single Family,
Planned
Attached M (Medium Density
Development 10
Residential)
Units per Acre)
Multi-Family R-3 (Medium
Residential Density Residential)

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Fifteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Surrounding Existing Land Use Planned or Special Existing Zoning


Property Per Title 19.12 Land Use Designation District
PD (Planned
Shopping Center
SC (Service Development)
Office, Other Than Commercial) C-1 (Limited
Listed Commercial)
GC (General C-2 (General
Mixed Use
Commercial) Commercial)
East
Utility Installation PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
R-PD10
(Residential
Single Family, M (Medium Density
Planned
Attached Residential)
Development 10
Units per Acre)
SF2 (Single Family
Single Family,
Detached 6 Units per
Detached
Acre)
P-C (Planned
West Golf Course P (Parks/Open Space)
Community)
MF2 (Medium Density
Multi-Family
Multi-family 21 Units
Residential
per Acre)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Peccole Ranch Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
R-PD (Residential Planned Development) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification
N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Las Vegas Zoning Code Title 19.06.040 prior to Ordinance 6135 (March
2011), the Development Standards within an R-PD District are established by the Site
Development Plan. The following standards are proposed by the applicant:

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Sixteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Standard Lots less than or Lots greater than


equal to 20,000 sf* 20,000 sf
Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sf 20,000 sf
Building Setbacks:
Front yard to private street or access 30 feet 35 feet
easement
Side yard 5 feet 7.5 feet
Corner side yard 12.5 feet 15 feet
Rear yard 25 feet 30 feet

Standard Lots less than or Lots greater than


equal to 20,000 sf* 20,000 sf
Accessory structure setbacks:
Porte cochere to private street 15 feet 15 feet
Side loaded garage to side yard property 15 feet 15 feet
line
Patio covers and/or 2nd story decks 20 feet 20 feet
Separation from principal dwelling 6 feet 6 feet
Side yard 5 feet 5 feet
Corner side yard 5 feet 5 feet
Rear yard 5 feet 5 feet
Building Heights:
Principal dwelling 40 feet 50 feet
Accessory structures 25 feet 30 feet
Floors 2 stories on slab or 3 stories on lots
over basement greater than
35,000 sf;
otherwise 2 stories
Permitted uses Single family Single family
residence and residence and
accessory accessory
structures** structures**
Lot Coverage Bound by setbacks Bound by
setbacks
*Includes Lots 1, 2 and 24.
**Accessory structures may have a trellis or canopy attached to the principal dwelling.

Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed


1,250 (based on 166.99
R-PD7 7.49 du/ac
acres)
Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
N/A N/A N/A

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Seventeen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed


PR-OS N/A N/A
Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
L 5.49 du/ac 916 (based on 166.99 acres)

Pursuant to Title 19.06.040, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 10 Trees 15 Trees Y
South N/A N/A 81 Trees N/A
East N/A N/A 0 Trees N/A
West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 43 Trees 47 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 53 Trees 143 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North 6 Feet 20 Feet Y
South 0 Feet 0 Feet Y
East 0 Feet 0 Feet Y
West 6 Feet 20 Feet Y
6 wrought iron
or CMU
adjacent to
Orient Express
Ct.

Stepped
retaining/
screen wall not
Wall Height Not required exceeding 10 Y
adjacent to
Verlaine Ct.
and existing
lots to the north

10
retaining/screen
wall adjacent to
Hualapai Way

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Eighteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Open Space R-PD only


Total Density Required Provided Compliance
Acreage Ratio Percent Area Percent Area
34.07 ac 1.8 1.65 2.97% 1.01 ac 6.22% 2.12 ac Y

Actual Complianc
Functional
Governing Street e with
Street Name Classification
Document Width Street
of Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Master Plan of Streets
Alta Drive Major Collector 84 Y
and Highways Map
Master Plan of Streets
Hualapai Way Primary Arterial 98 N
and Highways Map

19.04.040 Connectivity
Transportation Network Element # Links # Nodes
Internal Street 9 0
Intersection Internal 0 5
Cul-de-sac Terminus 0 3
Intersection External Street or Stub Terminus 0 0
Intersection Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
0 0
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted 0 0
Total 9 8
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links /
N/A 1.13
Nodes):

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Single
2 spaces
Family, 61 units 122
per unit
Detached
Accessory 1
Structure additional
61 casitas 61
(Class I) space
[Casita] per lot
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 183 183 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces
183 0 183 0 Y
Required

SS
GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Staff Report Page Nineteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
Private streets must meet
To allow 32 wide private
public street standards unless
streets with 30 roll curbs with
waived
sidewalk on one side Approval
(47 minimum with L-curbs
(easement) in a gated
and sidewalks on both sides
community
of the street)

SS
GPA-68385



GPA-68385

GPA-68385
7AA
7Ab7A7
7A7
77
Ab7777
A777A7
b

A77b7AA
77bAb

7777A77
b7A77
7A7A77A 77A77777b77b7
77b7777777
77A7b77A77 7b
A7A77A7A777 777b77A77A7 b7A
77bA

AA7
bA7A7
77bA

Ab7 
b

77A7

bb7A7 777
77777





7



7 7 7

A7A
A A
7A77 bb7A77777777
 A
777A
7A7Ab777
A Ab
7A7Ab77bAA
A Ab bAA
A777A777A7bAA
A A A bA
bA77Ab
Ab 7777bAA777Ab
bAA
777A
 A
Ab AA
7Ab77AA A7
Ab A
7Ab77A
7b7  A
777A7Ab

777A7777A
A A
777

bA
bA
b7

7
Ab7777

b7
7A7bA7b



A77A7
A  A A7b

GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



7 7



7b
A
A
7
7bA
A



b7A A
b7A
b 7A




A
7A

7A

b A

7A
b
b

A

7b
AA

AA


b A
A 7A

7
7AA

A


7A A
b

b


b
7


7b
7 A

Ab7777
Ab

A
7A 7

bA

7b

7 A


Ab7777

7A7bA7b
777

GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED


7bA7
A
7 7



7A
A
7
b7 A 7A


b7A A

A
A7b 777b
A
A

A7b
A


7b
AA

b

7AA b
b

b
77b
A

Ab7777

7b

7 A


Ab7777


Ab7777

7A7bA7b
777

GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED


7 7

7b
A
A
7

7A

A
777b
A

Ab7777

Ab7777

7A7bA7b
777

GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED


Ab77777 Ab7777

b77bA
b

A7 7A77b7 7 AA777A7 b7 AAA7A77A

Ab7777
Ab7777

7 7A77 7 77A7 "7 77A

Ab7777

Ab7777
Ab7777

7 7A77A7 7 A
7A7 7
7A777A

Ab7777

Ab7777
Ab
A7

bb
bb
Ab7777

A
A
7A7bA7b

A
A


7 7A7b77A7 7 A A A
AAA7A77A7

GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED


7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7

7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 b7b7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7

7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7
7
7
7 7

7 b7b7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7
7
7
7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7
7

7
A7
b7b

7

Ab7777

7A7bA7b

7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7
7
7
7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7
b7b7
7

GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 - REVISED



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482



GPA-68385, WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482


GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385 [PRJ-67184] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO WVR-68480, SDR-68481 AND TMP-68482-
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTA DRIVE AND HUALAPAI WAY
01/05/17
GPA-68385

GPA-68385

GPA-68385

Agenda Item No.: 22.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
WVR-68480 - WAIVER RELATED TO GPA-68385 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Waiver TO ALLOW 32-FOOT PRIVATE STREETS WITH A SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE
WHERE 47-FOOT PRIVATE STREETS WITH SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES ARE
REQUIRED WITHIN A PROPOSED GATED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT on 34.07
acres at the southeast corner of Alta Drive and Hualapai Way (Lot 1 in File 121, Page 100 of
Parcel Maps on file at the Clark County Recorder''s Office; formerly a portion of APN 138-31-
702-002), R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development - 7 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers)
[PRJ-67184]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 3 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps - WVR-68480, SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Justification Letter
5. Protest Postcards - WVR-68480 and SDR-68481 [PRJ-67184]
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
WVR-68480



WVR-68480




WVR-68480

WVR-68480 - REVISED


WVR-68480 - REVISED
Agenda Item No.: 23.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68481 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-68385 AND
WVR-68480 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC -
For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 61-
LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT on 34.07 acres at the southeast
corner of Alta Drive and Hualapai Way (Lot 1 in File 121, Page 100 of Parcel Maps on file at the
Clark County Recorder''s Office; formerly a portion of APN 138-31-702-002), R-PD7
(Residential Planned Development - 7 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-67184]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 3 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Justification Letter - SDR-68481 and TMP-68482 [PRJ-67184]
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SDR-68481



SDR-68481

SDR-68481
SDR 68481 & TMP 68482
180 Land Company, LLC

SEC Alta Drive & Hualapai Way


Proposed 61 unit single family residential development.

Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.52 581


AM Peak Hour SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DWELL] 61 0.75 46
PM Peak Hour 1.00 61

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Hualapai Way
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 18,715
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,497

Alta Drive
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,744
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 940

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Hualapai Way 44,468
Alta Drive 35,490

This project will add approximately 581 trips per day on Hualapai Wy. and Alta Dr. Currently, Hualapai is at about 42
percent of capacity and Alta is at about 33 percent of capacity. With this project, Hualapai is expected to be at about 43
percent of capacity and Alta to be at about 35 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 61 additional cars, or about one every minute.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.



SDR-68481 and TMP-68482

SDR-68481 and TMP-68482


Agenda Item No.: 24.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
TMP-68482 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-68385, WVR-68480 AND SDR-68481 -
PARCEL 1 @ THE 180 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 180 LAND
COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 61-LOT
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 34.07 acres at the southeast corner of
Alta Drive and Hualapai Way (Lot 1 in File 121, Page 100 of Parcel Maps on file at the Clark
County Recorder''s Office; formerly a portion of APN 138-31-702-002), R-PD7 (Residential
Planned Development - 7 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-67184]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 3 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Postcards
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
TMP-68482



TMP-68482

TMP-68482

TMP-68482 - REVISED

TMP-68482 - REVISED

TMP-68482 - REVISED

TMP-68482 - REVISED

TMP-68482 - REVISED

TMP-68482 - REVISED

TMP-68482
SDR 68481 & TMP 68482
180 Land Company, LLC

SEC Alta Drive & Hualapai Way


Proposed 61 unit single family residential development.

Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.52 581


AM Peak Hour SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DWELL] 61 0.75 46
PM Peak Hour 1.00 61

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Hualapai Way
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 18,715
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,497

Alta Drive
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,744
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 940

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Hualapai Way 44,468
Alta Drive 35,490

This project will add approximately 581 trips per day on Hualapai Wy. and Alta Dr. Currently, Hualapai is at about 42
percent of capacity and Alta is at about 33 percent of capacity. With this project, Hualapai is expected to be at about 43
percent of capacity and Alta to be at about 35 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 61 additional cars, or about one every minute.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Agenda Item No.: 25.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
MOD-68579 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Major Modification of the Town
Center Land Use Plan TO AMEND MAP FOUR TO ADD THE MC-TC (MONTECITO -
TOWN CENTER) LAND USE DESIGNATION AND REMOVE THE MONTECITO TOWN
CENTER MIXED USE COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DESIGNATION on approximately 202.00
acres generally located north of Clark County 215, east of Durango Drive (APNs multiple),
Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68578]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Abeyance Request Letter
2. Location and Aerial Maps
3. Conditions and Staff Report
4. Supporting Documentation
5. Photo(s)
6. Justification Letter
MOD-68579 [PRJ-68578]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

** STAFF REQUESTS THIS ITEM BE HELD IN ABEYANCE TO THE


MARCH 14, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING **
MOD-68579


77 77
A7

A7
Ab77 Ab77 Ab7

b A7
7b77
A77 A 7
7
7b7bb

7b7bb

7b77bb
bA7A
77b



7

77 7b

A7bA7
7b77bb

77

A
A7

bA7
A 7

A7
77b
A7A7A 777

77b
b7
777

AAA7
77b


A7A
777

bA7
7
bA
77

A7A
7A77Ab
7
777


7A
77b
7


77b

b
77b

7AAb7
77


AA7

7
7
A7

A7
77

A
7 7

A7A

bA7

A7
A7777777
77 7777
bA7
7 77 7
b7b77777

77


A77

7bAA7

AA77

7777

AAA77
7777777b
7A7

777 7
A7 77777
77
77 7

77 77
77

MOD-68579
A

A 7
Ab77 Ab7
A7
Ab7

A7 7 A 7 b A7
7
7b77
7b7bb

bA7A
7b7bb

7b77bb



7
77b


77 7b

A 7bA 7
77

A
b A 7
A7

A 7
7bb
A7A7A7 7b77bb

77b
b7 777

AAA7
77b


A7A 777

b A 7
7
77b

bA
7

A7A
7 777


7A 7A77Ab
777

77 77b

7AAb 7
7 7


AA7

7
7
A7

A 7
7 7

A
7 7

A7A

bA7

A7777777
A
7

77 7777
7 77 7
b7b77777

77
bA7

A 77

7bAA7
7777
A

7777777b
A7

777 7
77777
AA77

77

AAA77
7

777


A7
77 77
77

MOD-68579
MOD-68579


Agenda Item No.: 26.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
ZON-68403 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL
FORESIGHT GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning
FROM: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) AND C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO: C-2
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on 3.32 acres at 1213 and 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard and
516 Park Paseo (APNs 162-03-112-022, 028 and 029), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68241]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
4. Photo(s) - ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
5. Justification Letter - ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
6. Protest/Support Postcards
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT GOLF &
FITNESS, LLC, ET AL

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-68403 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
SDR-68404 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: ZON-68403

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 33

NOTICES MAILED 319 - ZON-68403


324 - SDR-68404

APPROVALS 1 - ZON-68403
1 - SDR-68404

PROTESTS 1 - ZON-68403
1 - SDR-68404

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-68404 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. All development shall be in conformance with the landscape plan and building
elevations date stamped 12/29/16 and site plan date stamped 01/19/17, except as
amended by conditions herein.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to
determine the most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the
existing lots. The mapping action shall be completed and recorded prior to the
issuance of any building permits.

6. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,


Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

7. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

8. A Comprehensive Construction Staging Plan shall be submitted to the Department


of Planning for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The Construction Staging Plan shall include the following information: Design and
location of construction trailer(s); design and location of construction fencing; all
proposed temporary construction signage; location of materials staging area; and
the location and design of parking for all construction workers.

9. Prospective buyers shall be informed that views may be obscured by future


adjacent development and this information shall be included in project CC & Rs.

10. Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the
subject site. A copy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any
future building permit applications related to the site.

11. All signage shall be in conformance with the requirements of Title 19.14 and the
Las Vegas Boulevard Scenic Byway Overlay District.

12. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

13. Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalk and
the proposed driveways adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements
of Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with
development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site.

14. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets
concurrent with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend
from the sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway
network and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.

15. Prior to the submittal of construction drawings, coordinate the design and
construction of a relief sewer line with the Sanitary Sewer Section of the
Department of Public Works. This relief sewer line shall be constructed
concurrently with development of this site.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Conditions Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

16. Contact the City Engineers Office at 229-6272 to coordinate the development of
this project with the Las Vegas Boulevard, Stewart to Sahara project, and any
other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the
recommendations of the City Engineer.

17. All private improvements and landscaping installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

18. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the Las
Vegas Boulevard public right-of-way, if any, prior to the issuance of permits for
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of
the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured
entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property within the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right-of-way shall be the responsibility of the
applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to
the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the License
Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and
Safety (229-4836).

19. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of
any construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and
#234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent
to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. Phased
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor
compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of
approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the
development of this site.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Conditions Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

20. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building
or grading permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved
drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended
by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This request is for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-68404) for a proposed 15-
story, 195-foot tall Mixed-Use development, consisting of 370 residential (studio) units
and 16,060 square feet of retail space, to be located at 1213 and 1215 South Las
Vegas Boulevard and 516 Park Paseo.

In addition, the applicant has requested a Rezoning (ZON-68403) in conjunction with


this application to rezone the subject site from C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-2
(General Commercial) to: C-2 (General Commercial) to allow for consolidation of the lot.
Staff has determined the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development
in the area, therefore; staff recommends approval of this project with conditions.

ISSUES

The subject Property is located within the John S Park Neighborhood Plan Area,
which recommends a five story (60) feet height for commercially zoned properties
along Las Vegas Boulevard
Two parcels (APNs 162-03-112-028 and -029) are currently split-zoned C-1 (Limited
Commercial) and C-2 (General Commercial). The applicant has requested a
Rezoning (ZON-68403) to address the issue.

ANALYSIS

This project is located in the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan Downtown South
District and proposes to construct a 15-story, 195-foot tall Mixed-Use development
consisting of 370 residential units and 16,060 square feet of retail space, to be located
at 1213 and 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard and 516 Park Paseo.

The subject site consists of four parcels. Currently, one parcel (APN 162-03-112-022)
has a zoning designation of C-1 (Limited Commercial), and parcel (APN (162-03-112-
033) has a designation of C-2 (General Commercial). The remaining two parcels (APNs
162-03-112-028 and 029), have split-zoning C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-2
(General Commercial). The applicant has requested a Rezoning (ZON-68403) on APNs
162-03-112-022, 028 and 029 from C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-2 (General
Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial), so the four parcels can be consolidated at a
later time. The C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district allows for retail and
commercial uses of an intense character, as well as mixed-use developments as a
conditional land use.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Mixed-Use is described in Title 19.12 as: The vertical integration of residential uses
and commercial or civic uses within a single building or a single development, where the
uses share pedestrian access, vehicular access, parking functions, or any combination
thereof. Per Title 19.12 the following conditional use regulations apply:

Conditional Use Regulations:


1. Residential uses permitted as of right in the R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts are
permitted as conditional uses within a C-1 or C-2 Zoning District.

The applicant has proposed a Rezoning (ZON-68403) which will rezone the entire
subject site to a C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district, which allows residential uses
in conjunction with a Mixed Use Development.

2. Commercial uses or civic uses shall at a minimum be located at the ground level
fronting the primary public rights-of-way and may extend beyond the ground floor. The
principal entryway to access those uses, whether individually or collectively, shall be
directly accessed from and oriented to the public sidewalk.

The proposed Mixed-Use development provides 16,060 square feet of retail floor space
on the 1st and 2nd floor of the development which has access to the public side walk
fronting Las Vegas Boulevard.

3. Residential uses shall not be permitted on the ground floor fronting on primary public
rights-of-way, but may be located at or above the second level of the building.
Residential uses may be located on the ground floor of any building or portion thereof
that is located at the interior of the development site and does not front on an Arterial or
Collector Street.

The proposed Mixed-Use development provides 370 residential units on floors 2


through 15.

4. Surface parking lots shall be located to the side or the rear of the principal building(s)
on the site, and shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way by the
principal building(s) or a landscape buffer in conformance with the requirements of
LVMC Chapter 19.08. Parking structures shall not be located along the street frontages
of the development site, but shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way
by the principal building(s).

The proposed Mixed-Use development provides five levels of above ground parking
within a parking structure incorporated into the proposed building. Retail spaces line the
Las Vegas Boulevard frontage on first and second floors and the residential units line
the Las Vegas Boulevard frontage on floors four though fifteen. All surface parking lots

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

are located to the side and rear of the proposed building. The surface parking lot area
located on the northern perimeter of the site (APN 162-03-112-022) was approved by a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-49169). The surface parking
area on the southern perimeter is located in the rear of the property and is screened by
existing walls.

The subject site is located within the Las Vegas Boulevard Scenic Byway Overlay
District and is subject to the sign standards listed in Title 19.10.160. In addition, the
subject site is located within the John S. Park Neighborhood Plan, which recommends
that the neighborhood association work with the City to impose a commercial building
height limit of sixty (60) feet or five (5) stories, whichever is greater along Las Vegas
Boulevard. However, no development standards to limit building height have ever been
brought forward. The Downtown Centennial Plan Downtown South district does not
impose building height limitations. Staff notes that the proposed Mixed Use
development provides a 44-foot rear yard setback. In addition, the development
proposes a design which steps the building height back from the rear of the site
adjacent to the single-family residential dwellings (88 Feet) toward the front of the site
fronting Las Vegas Boulevard (195 Feet), which greatly reduces the visual impact to the
existing John S. Park Neighborhood.

Except for handicapped parking, Title 19 parking requirements are not automatically
applied within the boundaries of the Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District, but are
subject to conditions imposed by the City Council if needed. The site will provide 492
total parking spaces with nine ADA parking spaces. The parking structure includes 90
tandem parking spaces and 278 standard stalls. The remaining are surface lot parking
spaces located on the side and rear of the property. The parking area also provides
space for one trash room located on the northern perimeter of the building, which is
designed for a trash truck to pull directly inside.

All interior parking lot landscaping and landscape buffer planting materials have been
designed to comply with code requirements for spacing and quantities outlined in the
Downtown Centennial Plan. The submitted landscape plan indicates the site will provide
a three-foot landscape buffer along a portion of the southern property line and a 15-foot
landscape buffer along the eastern perimeter adjacent to the existing single-family
residential neighborhood. The primary tree species being utilized are 25-foot tall
Mexican Fan Palm, 36 box Raywood Ash, 36 box Mondell Pine and 24 box
Mediterranean Fan Palm trees.

The subject site is a partial block frontage (less than 50%), according to the Downtown
Centennial Plan threshold chart, and as such a covenant running with the land will be

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

required to obtain the property owners consent for future improvements. However, the
submitted plans indicate a 10-foot wide sidewalk with a five-foot amenity zone will be
provided with Mediterranean Fan Palm trees, which conforms to the Downtown
Centennial Plan Downtown South streetscape standards.

The site will need to be remapped to consolidate the existing parcels and platted lots.
The map must be recorded prior to the construction of the main building so as to
eliminate conflicts with existing property lines.

These parcels are currently served by the Las Vegas Valley Water District
(LVVWD). Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to the LVVWD for
domestic meter sizing and fire flow. Proof of parcel consolidation will be required prior
to civil plan approval. Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) Regional Connection
Fees will be assessed on a per unit basis and will be due prior to civil plan approval.
Utility structures are required to be located within the building footprint, or underground,
pursuant the Downtown Centennial Plan.

The proposed use and design of this proposal will make a positive contribution to the
urban design for the residents in the immediate area and for the community at large.
Staff recommends approval of the requested Rezoning and Site Development Plan
Review for the proposed 15-story Mixed-Use development.

FINDINGS (ZON-68403)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning


Commission or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed Rezoning from C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-2 (General
Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) is in conformance with the existing C
(Commercial) designation under the Southeast Sector Plan of the General Plan.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts.

The applicant has proposed a Mixed-Use development on the subject site,


which is a conditional land use within the proposed C-2 (General Commercial)
zoning designation.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

The proposed mixed use development is consistent with Las Vegas 2020
Master Plan Policy 1.1.3, which encourages new market rate, multi-unit mixed-
use residential development on vacant or underutilized sites, with ground floor
commercial components included where appropriate.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

Primary site access is from Las Vegas Boulevard, a Primary Arterial (100-foot
wide) street according to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and
secondarily from Park Paseo a Local Street as designated by Title 13. These
street facilities are adequate in size to provide suitable access to the site.

FINDINGS (SDR-68404)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed development provides stepbacks to focus the tallest portion of the
development on Las Vegas Boulevard in order to be compatible with the adjacent
residential development in the area. In addition, the applicant has provided
architectural features and sufficient landscaping creating an attractive
development.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed mixed use development is consistent with Las Vegas 2020 Master
Plan Policy 1.1.3, which encourages new market rate, multi-unit mixed-use
residential development on vacant or underutilized sites, with ground floor
commercial components included where appropriate. In addition, the subject site
meets the requirements of Title 19 and Downtown Centennial Plan.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The subject site is accessed from Las Vegas Boulevard, a Primary Arterial (100-
foot wide) street, according to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and Park
Paseo a Local Street as designated by Title 13, which provides suitable access
to the site.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

The proposed streetscape materials are consistent with the requirements of the
Downtown Centennial Plan and are appropriate for the area. The combination of
painted metal, concrete masonry veneer, clear glass guardrails, bare concrete
and tempered glazing for the exterior of the structure is appropriate for an urban
area and are consistent with the adjacent area

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The building has been designed to have an aesthetically pleasing faade, with a
44-foot rear yard setback. The primary structure has been designed to step the
building height back from the rear of the site adjacent to the single-family
residential dwellings (88 Feet) toward the front of the site fronting Las Vegas
Boulevard (195 Feet), which greatly reduces the visual impact to the existing John
S. Park Neighborhood. The applicant has proposed to use a combination of
painted metal, concrete masonry veneer, clear glass guardrails, bare concrete
and tempered glazing for the exterior of the structure which is appropriate for an
urban area. The architectural elements of the faade are blended through the use
of complementary materials, colors and finishes throughout the entire building,
incorporating canopies along Las Vegas Boulevard adjacent to the proposed retail
floor space.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The site will be subject to ongoing inspection and will therefore not compromise
the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the General Plan.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Board of City Commissioners approved a request for
reclassification of property (Z-0139-63) from R-1 (Single-Family
10/23/63 Residential) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on property legally described
as the east line of lot M at 1213 and 1215 South Las Vegas
Boulevard.
The City Council denied a request for a Rezoning (Z-0019-99) from C-
1(Limited Commercial) and C-2 (General Commercial) to C-2 (General
05/24/99 Commercial) on a larger 7.60-acre tract that included the subject
parcel. The Planning Commission also recommended denial of the
request.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
5369) for a proposed 505 square-foot lobby addition to an existing
Motel. The applicants accompanying request for Waivers of
12/15/04 Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape standards was partially
approved, with conditions to provide a portion of the required
streetscape. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
12631) which allowed a massage establishment and a Waiver of the
07/12/06 200-foot distance separation requirement from a residential use at
1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended denial of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Required Review (RQR-
22256) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-12631) which
07/11/07 allowed a massage establishment and a Waiver of the 200-foot
distance separation requirement from a residential use at 1215 South
Las Vegas Boulevard.
The Planning Department administratively approved a Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-23776) for a 529 square-foot
09/27/07
expansion to the lobby of an existing motel at 1213 Las Vegas
Boulevard. This approval expired on 09/18/09
The City Council approved the request for a Variance (VAR-43719) to
allow a proposed 25-foot tall freestanding sign to have a zero-foot
02/15/12 setback where five feet is required from the right-of-way is required.
The Planning Commission recommended approval with staff
recommending denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
44165) for a 29 square-foot accessory package liquor off-sale use
03/21/12
within an existing motel at 1213 South Las Vegas. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-49169) for a parking lot with Waivers to allow a
06/11/13 zero-foot landscape buffer along the west and south perimeters where
8-feet is required and to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along the
north perimeter where 15-feet is required at 516 Park Paseo.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
49910) for a proposed 1,200 square-foot Tavern-Limited
09/18/13
Establishment at 1213 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Master Sign Plan (MSP-
50474) for an existing Wedding Chapel and Motel development at
10/16/13
1205 and 1213 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


A deed was recorded for a change in ownership (APN 162-03-112-
04/13/12
022)
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership (APN 162-03-112-
03/03/15
028)
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership (APN 162-03-112-
029)
11/30/15
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership (APN 162-03-112-
033)

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A commercial building was developed at 1213 South Las Vegas
Circa 1963
Boulevard.
A commercial building was developed at 1215 South Las Vegas
Circa 1964
Boulevard.
A business license (#G50-05786) was issued for a General Retail
Sales use (Super 8) located at 1213 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The
license is still active.
05/16/11
A business license (#M08-00206) was issued for a Motel use (Super
8) located at 1213 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The license is still
active.
A Code Enforcement case (#104395) was issued for an occupancy
08/03/11 investigation for work completed without permits located at 1215 South
Las Vegas Boulevard. The case was resolved on 08/13/12.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (#C05-02782) was issued for a Tobacco Dealer
12/21/11 use (Super 8) located at 1213 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The
license is still active.
A business license (#L15-00218) was issued for a Package Liquor
08/29/12 Sales use (Super 8) located at 1213 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The
license is still active.
A building permit (#243292) was issued for a parking lot (Super 8)
02/18/14
located at 516 Park Paseo. The permit was finalized on 03/12/14.
A Code Enforcement case (#150769) was issued for illegal plumbing
02/19/15 and construction located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The
case was resolved on 03/16/15.
A Code Enforcement case (#155909) was issued for illegal temporary
06/11/15 signage located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The case was
resolved on 06/25/15.
A building permit (#300646) was issued for tenant improvements
10/20/15 (Thunderbird Hotel) located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The
permit was finalized on 01/11/17.
A Code Enforcement case (#160588) was issued for a pool with
10/26/15 stagnant water located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The case
was resolved on 10/27/15.
A building permit (#331349) was issued for a wall sign (Thunderbird
12/06/16 Hotel) located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The permit was
finalized on 01/11/17.
A business license (#G64-00903) was issued for an Automated Teller
02/18/16 Operator use (Thunderbird Lounge) located at 1215 South Las Vegas
Boulevard. The license is still active.
A business license (#P64-00045) was issued for a Tavern use
(Thunderbird Lounge) located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard.
The license is still active.
A business license (#G64-01163) was issued for a Night Club use
(Thunderbird Lounge) located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard.
The license is still active.
02/22/16
A business license (#G64-01164) was issued for a Tobacco Dealer
use (Thunderbird Lounge) located at 1215 South Las Vegas
Boulevard. The license is still active.
A business license (#L64-00079) was issued for a Tavern use
(Thunderbird Lounge) located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard.
The license is still active.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Ten
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (#P64-00046) was issued for a Wedding Chapel
03/28/16 use (Thunderbird Wedding Chapel) located at 1215 South Las Vegas
Boulevard. The license is still active.
A business license (#P62-00314) was issued for a Gaming-Restricted
04/25/16 use (Thunderbird Lounge) located at 1215 South Las Vegas
Boulevard. The license is still active.
A business license (#G64-02897) was issued for a Hotel use
04/28/16 (Thunderbird Hotel) located at 1215 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The
license is still active.
A business license (#G64-03550) was issued for a Photography
Business use (Thunderbird Wedding Chapel) located at 1215 South
Las Vegas Boulevard. The license is still active.
A business license (#G64-03551) was issued for a Handbill and Oral
Solicitation use (Thunderbird Wedding Chapel) located at 1215 South
Las Vegas Boulevard. The license is still active.
06/01/16
A business license (#G64-03553) was issued for a General Retail
Sales use (Thunderbird Wedding Chapel) located at 1215 South Las
Vegas Boulevard. The license is still active.
A business license (#G64-03889) was issued for a Coin Amusement
Machine use (Thunderbird Wedding Chapel) located at 1215 South
Las Vegas Boulevard. The license is still active.

Pre-Application Meeting
A Pre-Application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over
the application materials and submittal requirements for a Rezoning &
12/20/16 Site Development Plan Review for a proposed 15-story, 195-foot tall
Mixed-Use development use consisting of 370 residential units and
16,060 square feet of retail space.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
The subject site contains two motels with a tavern, wedding chapel,
01/05/17
retail space and associated parking facilities.

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Eleven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 3.63

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Hotel/Motel
C-1 (Limited
Tavern
Subject Commercial)
Wedding Chapel C (Commercial)
Property
General Retail C-2 (General
Parking Lot Commercial)
Hotel/Motel
Wedding Chapel
Restaurant C-2 (General
North C (Commercial)
Banquet Facility Commercial)
Sexually Oriented
Business
C-2 (General
South General Retail C (Commercial)
Commercial)
Single-Family
L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
East Detached
Residential) Residential)
Dwellings
Hotel/Motel
Sexually Oriented C-2 (General
West C (Commercial)
Business Commercial)
General Retail

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Centennial Plan Y
John S. Park Historic Neighborhood Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (Downtown South) Y
Las Vegas Boulevard Scenic Byway Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Twelve
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front 70% along Property Line 100% Y
Side (north) N/A 28 Feet Y
Side (south) N/A 46 Feet Y
Rear N/A 44 Feet Y
Screened,
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof Gated, w/ a Y
or Trellis Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Pursuant to Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet 0 Trees 0 Trees Y
South 1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet 0 Trees 21 Trees Y
East 1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet 0 Trees 31 Trees Y
West 1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet 0 Trees 0 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 0 Trees 52 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
14 Trees 60 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North 0 Feet 0 Feet Y
South 0 Feet 3 Feet Y
East 0 Feet 15 Feet Y
West 0 Feet 0 Feet Y
Existing 6 to Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 8 Foot CMU
Wall

JB
ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 [PRJ-68241]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Las Vegas
Primary Arterial Streets and 100 Y
Boulevard
Highways
Park Paseo Local Street Title 13 50 Y

Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance


Five-foot wide amenity
Five-foot Y
zone
10-foot wide sidewalk 10- Feet Y
Date Palm Trees or
Downtown Centennial Plan
similar at 25 feet or
greater in height at 30- 4 Trees Y
foot intervals along Las
Vegas Boulevard
The subject site is a partial block frontage (less than 50%), the Downtown Centennial Plan
threshold chart indicates that a covenant running with the land will be required to obtain the
property owners consent for future improvements.

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement - Downtown
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Dwelling
Units
370 Units 1.25 463
Studio
Guest
1:6 Units 62
Parking
General
16,070 SF 1:175 SF 92
Retail
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 617 492 Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 604 13 483 9 Y*
*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to
the automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table should be
used to illustrate the requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.

JB
ZON-68403



ZON-68403



ZON-68403



ZON-68403

ZON-68403
ZON-68403


ZON-68403


ZON-68403


ZON-68403

ZON-68403

b b


7
A


7A

7
7
7

7
7
7

A


7b7


7


7


7
b

77
7b 7
7 7


7b 7b7

7b7A

7
7

!7A

77
7 7A b
b


7

7A



77A



7

77


!7A

A
7



7A
A

77A

7b7A7b77b


77A7

77
7

777


b77b
b b

777

777
77
A777A
7
777

b77b
b b
777 777
77= b777b
b b b777b
b b 7
77A 777 7
7777 777b
77 b777b
b b 777
777 7
77
7 7 b777b
b7 77 777
7 7
b b 777

7777= 7 7 7
777 b777
b
b777b
b
b
774 4
4
b77=
777
7b 7 7 7 7
b
74

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 - REVISED



ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 - REVISED



77AA
7 7 A 7 A
77 7 A 7 A
A b 7 7 7
A 7  7 7

A b A 7b 77 7
A A
A 7
7A

A 7
7 7 A

7
7

7 A
7 7

7
b b 7 A 7b b 7 A 7 7

7 A b 7

7

A b A A 7 7
7
7 7 7 A 7b A 7 A
7 A A A

7
7 A 7 

7
7 A 7 
7
7
7b A 7 A
A A bA777

7
7 A


7
b b 7b b

A 7
7
77 77
7 A 7

7  7 A b

A 7 A 7 7A A 7 A 7
A 7
7 A b A A b A A A b A
A 7 A A A A

7
A 7 A

7 b b A
77 b 7b
b 7

A 7 A

7 7A
7 A 7 A b b 7 7b 7 A
7A777 A  A 
77

77AA
7 A 7 A

7 A 7 A

7
7
7

b b 77 A 7b b

7
A 7

7 A
7 A b
7 A b

7 7 7 A
7 A
7

7
7b A 7 A
A A

7 77

7

7 A 7 
7  7
A7A7AA

7 7

77 b
7 A 7
7
7 A 7  7 7 7 7
7 7
A 7
A 7
7
7 7A
b A b A
A A
A
7
7 A 7 A

7
7 A 7 A

7 b b 7b b
A 7

7 A A b 7
7 7 7 b A b


7 A A A

7
7 A 7 A A
7 A
b b A

7 b 7b
b 7 7

7

A A A
7A

7
7 A 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 A
7 7 A 7  
7A777A
7 77

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



77AA
77

7 A 7 A 7
7 7  7
b
77 7 A 7

7 7 7
7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7
A
A 7

A 7

7
7
b b 7 A 7b b 7 7A

7 A
A 7 b A A b A
A
7 7 7 A A

7 A b 7
7 A
7

A b A A 7 7
7
7b A 7 A
A A

7
7 A 7  7

7

7 7 7
7
7b A 7 A
A A bA777

7


7 b b
b b 77 7
A 7
7 A

7 A b  7 7

A 7 A 7 A A 7 A 7
7
A b A 7 A b A
A A A 7

7
A
7 A b b A
77 A b 7b
A
A b A
A
7
AA

A


77
7 A 7 A 7 b b 7 7b 7 A 7  7 7 A 7 A b b 7b b
7A777 A A A A 7
7 77

77AA
7 A 7 A

7 A 7 A

7
7
7 7

b b 7 A 7b b 7 A 7
7
7 A

7 A b
7 A b

7 7 7 A
7 A
7


7 b b 7b b
A 7

7
7b A 7 A
7
A7A7AA

A A

7
7 A 7 

7
7 A 7 A

7


7
7 A 7 

7


7 7 A
A
A A b 7 7
7 b A b 7 7


7 A A A
7 A
A
7
A
7 A
b b A

77 b 7b
b 7
A b

7

A A A
7A


77
7 A b b 7b b 7 A
 A 7 A
7A777
7 77

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7 7

7b
7

A 7 7 7 7
A 7
7 7 77 b b A 7  7b A 7 A 7
7 77
77 77

bA777
A 77 A 7
7
A
7

A 7

A
7
7
A 7
7
b A b A
7
b
7
7b 7


7
A

7b7

A 77
  b
A 77 7

A
7


A 7

A 7 7
77

A 7
A 7
A 7
7A7AA A 7 7
77
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
7b7
b7b7
7

7b7
A7A7AA

A777
A777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
bbA7
bAbA7
7bA7

7
A77
A77
bA7A7

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
7
A7b7 A 7
A7
A7
A7

A 7
b 7
A
A7

A77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777

A77A77
7A777

7





ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7 7 7

A 77 A 77 A 7
77 7


7
7 ( 7


7 7


7 (

A 7 77 7 7 7
A 7
bA777
A 7
7


7
A
A 7b7
b( A

7

7
7
7(7

b 7
7b (

A 7
7 7
7

77


7
A

7
7

7
b 7
( 7
A 7
77 A 7 A A 7 7
77 A b

A 77
7
7

7
7 A 7
A 77

7
A 7 7
77 7A7AA7 A 7 7
7
A 77
7

bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A7A7AA

A7bbA7 A 7
b77
b7b7
A777
A777 A 7
7
7

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777

7
A77
A77
bA7A7
7
A( 7
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77 A 7
7 (
77
77
A77
7

A77
A7

A77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777

A7AA77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77Ab
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 A 7
b 7 (
A
77
A77A77
7A777

7





ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 77 A 7
77 7


7 7


7 * 7
7

A 77 7 7 7
A 7
bA777


7
A

7
b 7
7b *

A 7 7 A 7
7 7 7

77

b 7
* 7

7
7

7

A
77 A 7 A A 7 7
77 A b

7
7

A 7
A 77 7 A 7

A 7 77 7
77 7A7AA7 A 7 7
7
A 77
7

bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A7A7AA

b7b7 A 7
b77
A777
A777
A 7
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
7
A77

7
A77
bA7A7

77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7
A* 7
77
A7 A 7
7 *
A77
A77

A7AA77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77Ab
7

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
A 7
b 7 *
A
7A777

7





ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7

A 77 A 77 A 7
77 7

A b 7


7 7


7 7 ( 7
77 7

7 7 7
A 7
bA777

7
7 A
7

7
7 7
A 7
77


77

A 7 7 A 7
7 7 7 7

77


7
b 77
7 7 (
7

b 7
( 7

7

7

7

7 7
7

A 7 A A 7 7
77 A b

7
7
77 7

7
7

A 77 7 A 7

A 7 77 7
77 7A7AA7 A 7 7
7
A 77
7

bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A7A7AA

b77 A 7
b77
A777
A777

7
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
7
A77
A77

77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77 A 7
7 (
A77
A77 A 7
7 (
A77

A7AA77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77Ab

77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77
A 7

A77A77
7A777

7





ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 77 A 7
77 7

A b 7


7


7 77
77 7

7 7 7
A 7
bA777

7
7 A
7

7
7 7
A 7
77


77

A 7 7 A 7
7 7 7 7

77

7


b 77
7 (
7

b 7
( 7

7
7


7 7
7

A 7 A A
77 A b

7
7
7 7
7

7
7

7
A 77 A 7

A 7 77 7
77 7A7AA7 A 7 7
7
A 77
7

bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A7A7AA

b77 A 7
b77
A777
A777

7
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
7
A77
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77 7
A( 7
A77
A77 A 7
7 (
A77

A7AA77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77Ab

77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7
77
A 7

A77A77
7A777

7





ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7
 7
77

A b 7



7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 7 7 7
A 7
7 bA777
7


7


A
7


7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77
 7
7b 7
7 77 77 77 77 77 77 77

b 7
7 


7

7




7
7

7  77 7

b 7
7 


7
7
7 
77 7



7

7
 7
77

7

7 7




7
7

7 b
7

7
A 7 A 7 77 7

A 7 7
77 7A7AA A 7 7
7
A 77
7

bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77

7
A7A7AA

b77777 A 7
b77
b77
A777 7
77 7

7
A777

7b77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777

7b7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77 7

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77

77 7
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
A 7
7A777

7 7





ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7
 7
77

A b 7


77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
77 7 7 7
A 7
7 bA777
7


7


7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7 7 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 7
7

b 7
7 


7
7




7
7
77 7
7
77 b 7
7 


7

7 7 7
77 7


77
7 7
7


7
7
7
A 7
A 7 7
77 7

A 7

7
A 7 77 7

7A7AA A 7 7
7

7

bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7 7
A7A7AA

7
b77777 A 7
b77
b77
A777 7
77 7

7
A777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77
7 7

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
7
77 7

A77A77

A 7
7A777

7





ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7
 7
77



77 7 7 7 7
7 7 77
7 77
7 7
7 7 7 77
7
77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 7 7 7
A 7
7 bA777
7
7
7

7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A
77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 7
7

b 7
7 !


77 A b

7


7

7


7

7

A 7
A 7 7
7

A 7
7
A7A7AA

7 7

7A7AA
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77
b77
A777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
7A777

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7
# 7
77


7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 77 7 7 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 7 7 7
A 7
7 bA777
7
7
7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A
77 77 7 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
7
7 7 7
7
7

b 7
7 


77 A b

7

A 7
A 7 7
7

A 7
7
A7A7AA

7 7

7A7AA
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77
b77
A777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
7A777

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7
# 7
77



77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 77 77 77

77 77 77 77 77 77 77 7 7 7
A 7
7 bA777
7
7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A
7
7 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 7
7

b 7
7 #


77 A b

7

A 7
A 7 7
7

A 7
7
A7A7AA

7 7

7A7AA
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77
b77
A777

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
7A777

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7
77 7 #



77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77
77 77 77 77 77 77 77 7 7 7
A 7
7 bA777
7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A
7
7

7 77 77 77 77 77 77
7

b 7
7 


77 A b

7

A 7
A 7 7
7

A 7
7
A7A7AA

7 7

7A7AA
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77
b77
A777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
7A777

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7
77 7 #



77
7 7 7 7 7
77 77 77 77 77 77 7 7 7
A 7
7 bA777
7
7
7

7
7 7 7 A
77 77 77 77 7
7

b 7
7 #


77

A b
77

7


7

7


7

7

A 7
A 7 7
7

A 7
7
A7A7AA

7 7

7A7AA
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77
b77
A777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
7A777

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7
77 7 



77 7
7 7 77

77 77 7 7 7
A 7
7 bA777
7 7
7

7
7 7 A
7 7 77 7
7

b 7
7 

A b
77

A 7
A 7 7
7

A 7
7
A7A7AA

7 7

7A7AA
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77
b77
A777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
7A777

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A 7 b 7  7
77

7 7 7
7
7 77
A 7
7 bA777
7

A
7
7 7

b 7
7 


77
A b

A 7
A 7 7
7

A 7
7
A7A7AA

7 7

7A7AA
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77
b77
A777

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
7A777

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404



7 7

A 77 A
7



7
7
7 7 7

7

bA777



7
7 A
b 77 7
7 (

7 A b

A 7
A 7 7
7

A 7
7
A7A7AA

7A7AA
bbA777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
b77
A777

777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77

A77A77
7A777

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404


7 7 7

bA777

77 A 7 A 7 77 A 7 A 7 77 A 7 
7
A7A7AA

77 A 7  7 77 7 7 7 A 7 77b A 7 A 7 A A
AA7A


b b 77 A 7b b 7 b b 77b b 7 A 7 7 b b 77 7b 7 A 7

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404


ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
ZON-68403 [PRJ-68241] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-68404 - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT
GOLF & FITNESS, LLC, ET AL
1215 SOUTH LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD AND 516 PARK PASEO
01/05/17
77

b 777
7 7b
7 7 7
7 77
77 7

A7 7

7 7
7 b777
7 A777
7 7
7 A777777

7777

777777777777777 777777777 77
777777777777 7777777777777
7777777777777 77777777 7 7777 7
77777777777777b7

77777777777777777777777777777777 7
7777777777777777777777777777777
7777777777 777777777777777777
77

7777777777<7777777 777777777 77 77
7777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777A7777
777777777777777777777777 777
77777777777777777777b777777
777777777777777777777777777
7777777777777777777777777777
777777 777777777777

77777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777
7777777777777777 7777777777
7

7777777777777A7777777
7777777b77b777b77b777777b
b7777777777777777777b77b7b7777
777777777777

777777777777 7

77A77AA7bA
<77b

7 7777 7
77b777
7 777A7A


77b77 777 7777 7
77 77

ZON-68403 and SDR-68404 - REVISED


Agenda Item No.: 27.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68404 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-68403 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPITAL FORESIGHT GOLF & FITNESS, LLC ET AL
- For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 15-
STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 370 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND
16,060 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL SPACE on 3.63 acres at 1213 and 1215 South Las Vegas
Boulevard and 516 Park Paseo (APNs 162-03-112-022, 028, 029 and 033), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) and C-2 (General Commercial) Zones [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68241]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest/Support Postcards
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SDR-68404



SDR-68404



SDR-68404



SDR-68404

SDR-68404
SDR-68404


SDR-68404


SDR-68404


SDR-68404

SDR-68404
SDR 68404
Capital Foresight Golf & Fitness, LLC et al

1213 & 1215 S Las Vegas Boulevard


Proposed development with 370 apartments and 16.06 thousand square foot general retail store.

Existing Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5.63 1,396


AM Peak Hour MOTEL [ROOM] 248 0.45 112
PM Peak Hour 0.47 117

First New Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4.20 1,554


AM Peak Hour HIGH-RISE APARTMENT[DWELL] 370 0.30 111
PM Peak Hour 0.35 130

Second New Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 42.70 686


SHOPPING CENTER/GENERAL RETAIL
AM Peak Hour [1000 SF]
16.06 0.96 15
PM Peak Hour 3.71 60

Net Change

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4.18 844


HIGH-RISE RES.CONDO/TWNHM
AM Peak Hour [DWELL]
370 0.34 15
PM Peak Hour 0.38 73

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Las Vegas Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 27,247
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 2,180

Charleston Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 36,070
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 2,886

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Las Vegas Boulevard 34,645
Charleston Boulevard 52,173

This project will add approximately 844 trips per day on Las Vegas Blvd., Park Paseo and Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas is
currently at about 79 percent of capacity and Charleston is at about 69 percent of capacity. After this project, Las Vegas is
expected to be at about 81 percent of capacity and Charleston to be at about 71 percent of capacity. Counts are not
available for Park Paseo, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 73 additional cars, or about five every four
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Agenda Item No.: 28.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-66498 - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - VARIANCE - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC -
For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A TEN-FOOT RESIDENTIAL
ADJACENCY SETBACK WHERE 81 FEET IS REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at the northeast
corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), O (Office) Zone, Ward
6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 3 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 2 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
4. Justification Letter - VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
4. Back up Submitted at the November 1, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting - VAR-66498
and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417].pdf
5. Back up Submitted at the December 21, 2016 City Council Meeting - VAR-66498 and SDR-
66499 [PRJ-66417].pdf
6. Protest Comment Form
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL
INVESTMENT 4, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-66498 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
VAR-68295 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-66498
conditions:
SDR-66499 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-66498
conditions: VAR-68295

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 21

NOTICES MAILED 74 - VAR-66498 and VAR-68295


74 - SDR-66499

APPROVALS 0 - VAR-66498
0 - VAR-68295
0 - SDR-66499

PROTESTS
3 - VAR-66498
1 - VAR-68295
3 - SDR-66499

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-66498 CONDITIONS
Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-66499) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

VAR-68295 CONDITIONS
Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-66499) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-66499 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


66498) and Variance (VAR-68295) shall be required.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan and
building elevations date stamped 01/12/17, except as amended by conditions
herein.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot landscape


buffer along the south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter
where 15 feet is required.

5. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to not orient the building to the
corner where such is required.

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

7. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

8. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,


Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

9. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

11. Dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way where such does not exist adjacent to this site for
Centennial Parkway prior to the issuance of any permits. Additionally, grant a 5-
foot Pedestrian Access Easement for a future detached sidewalk on Tenaya Way
adjacent to this site prior to the issuance of any permit

12. Construct all incomplete half-street improvements meeting Complete Street


standards on Centennial Parkway and Bilpar Road including the required Multi-Use
Non-Equestrian Trail that is to be privately maintained by the adjacent property
owner concurrent with development of this site. Conceptual plans for the
Centennial Parkway improvements and roadway transitioning must be approved by
the City Traffic Engineer prior to submittal of construction drawings for permitting.
Install all appurtenant underground facilities, if any, adjacent to this site needed for
the future traffic signal system concurrent with development of this site. Extend all
required underground utilities, such as electrical, telephone, etc., located within
public rights-of-way, past the boundaries of this site prior to construction of hard
surfacing (asphalt or concrete). All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site.

13. Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalk and
the proposed driveway on Tenaya Way in accordance with code requirements of
Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with
development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site.

14. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets
concurrent with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend
from the sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway
network and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Conditions Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

15. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site.
All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

16. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the
Tenaya Way, Bilpar Road and Centennial Parkway public rights-of-way prior to this
issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an
insurance policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las
Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the
City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at
the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement.
The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of
way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to
the property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement.
Coordinate all requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development
Section of the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).

17. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire
Services to discuss fire requirements for the proposed use of this facility. The
design and layout of all onsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the
approval of the Department of Fire Services.

18. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this
site prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review and two Variances for a proposed
8,800 square-foot Office (Medical or Dental) with Waivers to allow a zero-foot landscape
buffer along the south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter where
15 feet is required on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and
Tenaya Way.

ISSUES

On December 21st, 2016 the City Council approved General Plan Amendment (GPA-
66496) amending the General Plan land use designation of the property from R
(Rural Density Residential) to O (Office).
On December 21st, 2016 the City Council approved Rezoning (ZON-66497)
amending the zoning of the subject property from U (Undeveloped) to O (Office).
The site is located east of the Town Center Master Plan area. Objective 2.3 of the
Centennial Hills Sector Plan protects existing residential neighborhoods from
sprawling commercial and office development by encasing such uses within the
Town Center area. This request does not meet the intent of the Centennial Hills
Sector Plan.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 has been requested, to allow a zero-foot landscape
buffer along the south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter
where 15 feet is required. Staff recommends denial of this request.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 has been requested, to not orient the building to the
corner of the site towards the right-of-way where such is required. Staff recommends
denial of this request.
A Variance (VAR-66498) is required to allow a 10-foot residential adjacency setback
where 81 feet is required. Staff recommends denial of this request.
A Variance (VAR-68295) is required to allow 44 parking spaces where 49 parking
spaces are required. Staff recommends denial of this request.
The Office (Medical or Dental) use is permitted in the O (Office) zoning district.

ANALYSIS

Originally, the applicant proposed Site Development Plan Review (SDR-66499) to


develop the subject site with two 4,400 square-foot buildings for a proposed Medical

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Office and Clinic land use. The subject site is located in the Centennial Hills Sector of
the General Plan with a land use designation of R (Rural Density Residential) and
zoning designation of U (Undeveloped). The applicant has submitted a request for a
General Plan Amendment (GPA-66496) from R (Rural Density Residential) to SC
(Service Commercial), a Rezoning (ZON-66497) from U (Undeveloped) to C-1 (Limited
Commercial) and a Variance (VAR-66498) to address residential adjacency setbacks
for the proposed Office (Medical or Dental) and Clinic land use. However, at the
December 21st, 2016 City Council Meeting the applicant amended General Plan
Amendment (GPA-66496) and Rezoning (ZON-66497) to request a land use
designation of O (Office) and zoning district of O (Office) respectively. In addition, the
applicant also amended the proposed land use on site from a 4,400 square-foot Medical
Office and 4,400 square-foot Clinic to 8,800 square feet of Medical Office only, which is
a permitted land use within O (Office) zoning designation. However, since the Medical
Office land use has a more intense parking requirement than the previously proposed
Clinic land use, a Variance (VAR-68295) is required to be approved to address
insufficient parking on the subject site. Since a new Variance (VAR-68295) was
required; the City Council remanded Variance (VAR-66498) and Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-66499) back to the February 14th, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting so
they could be re-heard with the new associated Variance (VAR-68295) at the same
time.

Accompanying Waivers are required to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along the
south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter where 15 feet is
required, and to not orient the building to the corner of the site where such is required.
The subject site is located in the Centennial Hills Sector of the General Plan and has a
current land use designation of O (Office) and zoning designation of O (Office); which
was approved by the City Council via General Plan Amendment (GPA-66496) and
Rezoning (ZON-66497) on December 21st, 2016. The applicant has submitted a request
for a Variance (VAR-66498) to address residential adjacency setbacks and a Variance
(VAR-68295) to address insufficient parking for the proposed 8,800 square-foot Office
(Medical or Dental) land use.

An Office (Medical or Dental) use is described in Tile 19.12 as: A professional office for
the administration of professional medical, psychological or dental care, including
examinations, screenings and minor outpatient surgical procedures. This use does not
include a facility that provides housing for individuals, a clinic, or any other facility that is
specifically defined in this Title.

The proposed site design complies with all applicable Title 19.08.070 site design
requirements pertaining to building setbacks, which requires a 10-foot front yard setback,
10-foot corner side setback, 10-foot side yard setback and a 20-foot rear setback. The
submitted elevations show a 27-foot building height adjacent to the existing R-E [Rural
Estates Residential (Clark County Designation)] zoned single-family residence located to

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

the east, which does not comply with residential adjacency standards outlined in Title
19.06.040. The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-66498) to allow a 10-foot
residential adjacency setback where 81 feet is required. The proposed 8,800 square-foot
development will cover approximately 16% of the 1.21 acre site. The submitted building
elevations indicate the building faades will have a tan and orange stucco finish, with slate
tile veneer accents.

The site will provide 44 total parking spaces with three ADA parking spaces, which does
not match the 49 spaces required by Title 19.12.010 for a 8,800 square-foot Office
(Medical or Dental) land use. The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-68295) to
allow 44 parking spaces where 49 parking spaces are required. The parking area also
provides space for one loading zone and one trash enclosure, which have been
designed to comply with Title 19.08 standards.

All interior parking lot landscaping and landscape buffer planting materials have been
designed to comply with code requirements for spacing and quantities; except for the
landscaping buffer area adjacent to the northern and southern perimeter of the property
where the applicant has requested a Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along
the south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter where 15 feet is
required. The primary tree species being utilized are 24 box Mexican Palo Verde, 24
box Shoestring Acacia, 24 box Holly Oak, 24 box Ash and 24 box African Sumac
trees. There is also a multi-use transportation trail which runs along the southern
property line, which will have a five-foot amenity zone and a 10-foot detached sidewalk.

Staff has determined the proposed project is not compatible with surrounding
development in the area, as demonstrated by the associated Waivers and Variances.
Therefore, staff is recommending denial of this project with conditions.

FINDINGS (VAR-66498)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by requesting to orient the proposed
structures adjacent to existing single-family land uses. Alternative building placement
oriented towards the corner of the site along Tenaya Way would allow conformance to
the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites
physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.

FINDINGS (VAR-68295)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a development that has a
parking requirement that is too intense for the subject site and is located adjacent to

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

existing single-family land uses. A less intense land use or reduction in the scope of the
project would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of
any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

FINDINGS (SDR-66499)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed Office (Medical or Dental) use is not compatible with the adjacent
residential development in the area, as evidenced by the associated Waivers
and Variances. Staff has determined that the proposed land uses are too
intense and not compatible with the RN (Rural Neighborhood Clark County)
designation on properties located northeast of the subject site that make up this
neighborhood.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed Office (Medical or Dental) development is consistent with the


General Plan. However, the proposed design does not comply with all Title 19
development standards. The applicant has requested Waivers to allow a zero-foot
landscape buffer along the south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north
perimeter where 15 feet is required and to not orient the building to the corner of
the site where such is required. In addition, the applicant has also requested a
Variance to allow a 10-foot residential adjacency setback where 81 feet is
required. Staff has determined the associated Waivers and Variance will have a
negative impact to the overall development.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Access to the site will be provided by Centennial Parkway a 60-foot wide Local
Street, and Tenaya Way an 80-foot Secondary Collector according to the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways and are sufficient in size to carry the amount of
traffic this proposed development will generate.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

The project design and style are appropriate for the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building
elevations indicate the building faades will have a tan and orange stucco finish,
with slate tile veneer accents. The primary tree species being utilized are 24 box
Mexican Palo Verde, 24 box Shoestring Acacia, 24 box Holly Oak, 24 box Ash
and 24 box African Sumac trees, which are consistent with the Southern Nevada
Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant List.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly
and are compatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are
suitable for the surrounding commercial and residential uses and the desert
environment.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed commercial development will be subject to inspections in order to


protect the public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (A-0024-00)
12/05/01 approximately 1.32 acres at the southeast corner of Bilpar Road and
Tenaya Way. The Annexation became effective 12/14/01.
The Planning Commission tabled a request to amend the General Plan
(GPA-3032) to change the land use designation from R (Rural Density
01/08/04 Residential) to SC (Service Commercial) on 1.21 acres at the
northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way. Staff had
recommended denial.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission tabled a request for a Rezoning (ZON-
3033) from U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) General
Plan Designation] to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 1.21 acres at the
northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way. Staff had
recommended denial.
The Planning Commission tabled a request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-3034) for a proposed 5,600 square-foot retail
building on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway
and Tenaya Way. Staff had recommended denial.
The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to hold GPA-66496, ZON-
10/11/16 66497, VAR-66498 and SDR-66499 in abeyance to the November 1,
2016 Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission failed to obtain a supermajority vote on a
request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-66496) FROM: R
(RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: SC (SERVICE
11/01/16
COMMERCIAL) on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial
Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), Ward 6 (Ross)
[PRJ-66417].
The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend
APPROVAL on requests for a Rezoning (ZON-66497) FROM: U
(UNDEVELOPED) [R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION] TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL), Variance
(VAR-66498) TO ALLOW AN TEN-FOOT RESIDENTIAL
ADJACENCY SETBACK WHERE 81 FEET IS REQUIRED and Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-66499) FOR A PROPOSED 8,800
SQUARE-FOOT MEDICAL CLINIC AND MEDICAL OFFICE
11/01/16 DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PERIMETER, AN 11-
FOOT BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET
IS REQUIRED AND TO NOT ORIENT THE BUILDING TO THE
CORNER WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at the
northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-
22-804-001), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential)
General Plan Designation] Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited
Commercial)] Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417].
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-66496) from R (Rural Density Residential) to SC (Service
12/21/16 Commercial) at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and
Tenaya Way. The proposed general plan designation was amended to
O (Office) at the City Council meeting, by the applicant.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-66497)
from: U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan
Designation] to C-1 (Limited Commercial) at the northeast corner of
Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way. The proposed zoning
designation was amended to O (Office) at the City Council meeting, by
the applicant.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


10/26/04 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no building permits or business licenses related to this site.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to review
the application materials and submittal requirements for the proposed
05/24/16
General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Variance and Site Development
Plan Review requests.

Neighborhood Meeting
A required neighborhood meeting was held at the Centennial Hills
YMCA at 6601 North Buffalo Drive in Las Vegas to discuss the
proposal. Six members of the public, two members of the
development team/owner, one staff member from the City Council
Office and one staff from the Planning Department were in attendance.

The following concerns were raised:


The neighbors indicated they would prefer homes to be built on
09/26/16 the subject site.
One neighbor preferred development over a vacant lot.
The neighbors feel the approval and construction of the
apartment complex across the street has now opened the door
for commercial to take over the area and that the neighborhood
will forever be changed, and no longer rural.
One neighbor indicated concern over no street lighting being
installed in the area. Did not like individuals walking in the dark
during evening/night hours.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
Questions were raised over the hours of operation of the
proposed facility, applicant indicated that they did not intend to
lease to a 24-hour operation.

The neighbors expressed concern over the construction of the


apartment complex on the corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya
Way. The neighbors indicated they were promised lush landscape
buffers and the planting materials going in now are not sufficient, as
well as a wrought iron fence being attached to the neighbors rear yard
block walls. Staff indicated that the issues raised would be investigated
by Planning and the Code Enforcement division.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine site visit a found the subject site to be an
09/01/16
undeveloped parcel of land.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 1.21

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject R (Rural Density
Undeveloped U (Undeveloped)
Property Residential)
North Undeveloped O (Office) O (Office)
South Right-of-Way ROW (Right-of-Way) ROW (Right-of-Way)
OP (Office R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family,
East Professional) Clark Residential) Clark
Detached
County Designation County Designation
Undeveloped
SX-TC (Suburban
(approved Multi-
West Mixed Use Town T-C (Town Center)
Family
Center)
Residential)

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Ten
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.08.070, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 SF 150 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet 20 Feet Y
Side 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
Corner 10 Feet 115 Feet Y
Rear 20 Feet 20 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 16 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A 27 Feet N*
Screened,
Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure Y
Screened, Gated, a Roof or
w/ a Roof or Trellis Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y
*The proposed building height does not comply with the residential adjacency standards
set forth in Title 19.08.040(H).

Pursuant to Title 19.08.040, the following standards apply:


Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
3:1 proximity slope 81 Feet 10 Feet N*
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 145 Feet Y

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Eleven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed


U (Undeveloped) 1 du/lot 1
Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
C-1 (Limited Commercial) N/A N/A
Existing General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
R (Rural Density
3.59 du/ac 4
Residential)
Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
SC (Service Commercial) N/A N/A

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 11 Trees 11 Trees Y
South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 6 Trees 6 Trees Y
East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 9 Trees 13 Trees Y
West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 11 Trees 11 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 37 Trees 41 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
10 Trees 10 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North 15 Feet 11 Feet N*
South 15 Feet 0 Feet N*
East 8 Feet 10 Feet Y
West 15 Feet 15 Feet Y
Not Y or N
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Indicated
*Waivers from Title 19.08.070 were requested to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer
along the south perimeter and an 11-foot buffer along the north perimeter where 15 feet
is required.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Twelve
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Centennial Planned Streets and
Local Street 50 Feet Y
Parkway Highways Map
Master Plan of Streets
Tenaya Way Major Collector 80 Feet Y
and Highways

Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance


5-foot amenity zone,
5-foot amenity zone, 5-
Bilpar Road 5-foot detached Y
foot detached sidewalk
sidewalk
3-foot amenity zone,
3-foot amenity zone, 5-
Tenaya Way 5-foot detached Y
foot detached sidewalk
sidewalk
(Multi-Use
(Multi-Use
Transportation Trail)
Transportation Trail) 5-
5-foot amenity zone,
Centennial Parkway foot amenity zone, 10- Y
10-foot detached
foot detached sidewalk
sidewalk with 5-foot
with 5-foot landscaping
landscaping

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Gross Floor Handi Handi
Use Parking
Area or Regula - Regula -
Ratio
Number of r cappe r cappe
Units d d
1:200 up
Office
to 2,000
Medical or 8,800 SF 49
SF, then
Dental
1:175 SF.
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 49 44 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces N*
47 2 41 3
Required
Loading Less than
1 1 Y
Spaces 10,000 SF
* A Variance (VAR-68295) is required to allow 44 parking spaces where 49 parking
spaces are required. Staff recommends denial of this request.

JB
VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 [PRJ-66417]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow a zero-foot
landscape buffer
along the south
A 15-foot landscaping buffer
perimeter and an 11-
is required along all rights-of- Denial
foot buffer along the
way.
north perimeter
where 15 feet is
required.
To not orient the
Buildings on corner lots
proposed buildings to
should be oriented to the Denial
the corner where
corner and to the street fronts.
such is required.

JB
VAR-66498



VAR-66498



77777

77bb7b7A7b7777b77A

7Ab7A

AbA7AA777AbA7A7 77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
bb7A7b777A77b77A7A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7

7bb7A7bA7
77777777777777777777777 7

77%7A

7 AbA7Abb7A

AbA7Abb7A777b77777b7A
7A7A7A7A7

7
7 AbA7Abb7

7 7A7
A
7A
7 7
777A7A

7 7

7 77A

777Ab7bb7b77A7A
7
7

7
77

7 bb7bbA

77

77 bA7bbb
7
AA7AA7AA7A7

7 AA7 Ab7 A7 A
7
7
7 A7 7 A

bA7 77
7 b7 777
7

77 A7Ab 7

77A7 7 7

7 7777Ab7
7b7
A77AA7A
7A7
77%7A77777777777%%

77777777
A7
77777

AA7A


7
7
77777777777777777777777

7
77

7
bA7b

A
7A


b77777b7%


b777

AA

bA
bA

b
A

7
7
%7

A
7A
A


bA


7
7

77


A
A

7 7777

VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 - REVISED



77777

77bb7b7A7b7777b77A

7Ab7A

AbA7AA777AbA7A7 77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
bb7A7b777A77b77A7A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7

7bb7A7bA7
77777777777777777777777 7

77%7A

7 AbA7Abb7A

AbA7Abb7A777b77777b7A
7A7A7A7A7

7
7 AbA7Abb7

7 7A7
A
7A
7 7
777A7A

7 7

7 77A

777Ab7bb7b77A7A
7
7

7
77

7 bb7bbA

77

77 bA7bbb
7
AA7AA7AA7A7

7 AA7 Ab7 A7 A
7
7
7 A7 7 A

bA7 77
7 b7 777
7

77 A7Ab 7

77A7 7 7

7 7777Ab7
7b7
A77AA7A
7A7
77%7A77777777777%%

77777777
A7
77777

AA7A


7
7
77777777777777777777777

7
77

7
bA7b

A
7A


b77777b7%


b777

AA

bA
bA

b
A

7
7
%7

A
7A
A


bA


7
7

77


A
A

7 7777

VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 - REVISED


7
7 A7 A77 7

7 bA7A7 7
%

77 7 7 7
7AbAbA A7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
A7
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
7A A7 7

7 77777777777777777777777 7

77%7A

7 A 7
7

7 AbA7Ab7 A 7
7

A
7A
7 7
777A7A

7 7 7A
7

7 A7A 7A
7
7
77%7A77777777777%%

AA7A
77777777777777777777777
77

bA7b


b77777b7%
b777

b
A 7A
A


7
7 7777

VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 - REVISED


7
7 A7 A77 7

7 bA7A7 7
%

77 7 7 7
7AbAbA A7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
A7
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7
7A A7 7

7 77777777777777777777777 7

77%7A

7 A 7
7

7 AbA7Ab7 A 7
7

A
7A
7 7
777A7A

7 7 7A
7

7 A7A 7A
7
7
77%7A77777777777%%

AA7A
77777777777777777777777
77

bA7b


b77777b7%
b777

b
A 7A
A


7
7 7777

VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 - REVISED


%
77777

7 bb

7 bA

7 A 77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
A77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7

7 A77 77777777777777777777777 7

77%7A

bA7A


777A7A

7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77%7A77777777777%%

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777777777777777777
77

bA7b7


b77777b7%
b777

VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 - REVISED


%
77777

7 bb

7 bA

7 A 77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
A77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7

7 A77 77777777777777777777777 7

77%7A

bA7A


777A7A

7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77%7A77777777777%%

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777777777777777777
77

bA7b7


b77777b7%
b777

VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 - REVISED


%
77777

77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7
77777777
777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777
77777777 77777777 777 7777 7777777777 7

77777777777777777777777 7

77%7A
777A7A

7

77

7
77%7A77777777777%%
77777777777777777777777
77

bA7b7


b77777b7%
b777

7
7 7777

VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499 - REVISED



VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499



VAR-66498, VAR-68295 and SDR-66499


VAR-66498 [PRJ-66417] - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-68295 AND
SDR-66499 - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND TENAYA WAY
09/01/16
VAR-66498 [PRJ-66417] - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-68295 AND
SDR-66499 - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND TENAYA WAY
09/01/16
VAR-66498 [PRJ-66417] - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-68295 AND
SDR-66499 - APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND TENAYA WAY
09/01/16
City of Las Vegas PRSRT
Office Of The City Clerk FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
495 South Main Street, 2nd Floor
t'.if fr
r.-,,,:.-.rr PA ID
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Las Vegas, NV
r : Li\r
Permit No. 1630

Return Service Requested


Official Notice of Public iq P ti: 13

\ tElr
lc Hall

,95 Sett

If you wish to file your protest or support on this request, check the
appropriate box below and return this card in an envelope with postage to the
Office Of The City Clerk at the address listed above or fax this side of this VAR-66498, SD B-66499
card to (702) 382-4803. If you would like to contact your Council I ZSZZZ O I O I g"ase:
64. JAMIESON FAMILY TRUST
ve, please call (702) 229-640s.
JAMIESON WILLIAM M & ROSALIE TRS
I SUPPORT 6610 N TENAYA WAY
this Request
K t?,'i"",:",,
Please use available blank space on card for your comments.
LAS VEGAS NV 89131.3401

vAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRI- 664171


City Council Meeting of December 21,2016

' .-fli:Lrt:f'i,: L t i3 J'


il1,
tlll, rh
tllhltlh tlt,lllil tl,t,,,trf l,,r,lilllll,ttl,lllilll

i.'bmitted af ter f inal agenr,

DaIzl1lllb nen l -LL


t"i}. '"#E{;.{i fit"}^ F}?i}
City of Las Vegas : ,.

Office Of The City Clerk 3"*.' :.i:{.'t'.'-}lt FEf 5 L


!1 " t-' i t\.'-
495 South Main Street,2nd Floor iir-''-
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 '-':i .,-:.i\ii

Return Service nqqgffiQt A il: ttZ


Official Notice of Publd Hearing

\
srttt

*tlt I ll ,t

If you wish to file your protest or support on this request, check the
appropriate box below and return this card in an envelope with postage to the VAR-66498, SDR-66499
pSZZgOqOOSCase:
Office Of The City Clerk at the address listed above or fax this side of this
33, BARRY EDWARD P & MAUREEN L
card to (702) 382-4803. If you would like to contact your Council 6440 sKY POTNTE DR #140-272
LAS VEGAS NV 89131

Please for your comments.


vAR-66498 and SDR-66499 [PRI-664171
City Council Meeting of December 2I,2AL6
t g .-,,Ft;f'Jfs'f g J,.'3 lll,l,lt,lltl,lltltl,,lllt,,t,lll,,tl,l, lt,tl,t,tlil,,l,ll,,llttl

Submitted after final agenda

nate
zlzfltb nen blLL
Agenda Item No.: 29.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68295 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-66498 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 44 PARKING SPACES WHERE 49 PARKING
SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and
Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), O (Office) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Comment Form
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
VAR-68295



VAR-68295


Agenda Item No.: 30.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-66499 - REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-66498 AND VAR-68295 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: MABUHAY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT 4, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 8,800 SQUARE-
FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PERIMETER, AN 11-FOOT BUFFER
ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO NOT
ORIENT THE BUILDING TO THE CORNER WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at
the northeast corner of Centennial Parkway and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-804-001), O (Office)
Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-66417]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 3 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 2 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Comment Form
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SDR-66499



SDR-66499


SDR 66499
Mabuhay Commercial Investment 4, LLC

NEC Centennial Parkway & Tenaya Way


Proposed 8.8 thousand square foot medical office building.

Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 36.13 318


MEDICAL-DENTAL OFFICE BUILDING
AM Peak Hour [1000 SF]
8.8 2.39 21
PM Peak Hour 3.57 31

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Centennial Parkway
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,060
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 245

Tenaya Way
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 17,455
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,396

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Centennial Parkway 25,090
Tenaya Way 35,490

This project will add approximately 318 trips per day on Centennial Pkwy. and Tenaya Wy. Centennial is currently at about
12 percent of capacity and Tenaya is at about 49 percent of capacity. After this project, these capacities are expected to
remain unchanged.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 31 additional cars, or about one every two
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Agenda Item No.: 31.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68150 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: NP PALACE, LLC
- For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A TOTAL OF 11,161 SQUARE
FEET OF FREESTANDING SIGN AREA WHERE 7,880 SQUARE FEET IS THE
MAXIMUM ALLOWED, A 175-FOOT TALL FREESTANDING SIGN WHERE 40 FEET IS
THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED, AND SEVEN WALL SIGNS THAT EXTEND UP TO 108
INCHES ABOVE THE BUILDING ROOF OR PARAPET WHERE 12 INCHES IS THE
MAXIMUM ALLOWED on 30.05 acres at 2411 West Sahara Avenue (APNs Multiple), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-68149]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: NP PALACE, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-68150 Staff recommends APPROVAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

MSP-68152 Staff recommends APPROVAL, if approved subject to VAR-68150


conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 25

NOTICES MAILED 242

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68150 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permits (SUP-64872,


64873 and 64874) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64875), except as
amended herein.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

MSP-68152 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permits (SUP-64872,


64873 and 64874) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64875), except as
amended herein.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. All development shall be in conformance with sign plan and elevation sheets CV-1,
1.0, 2.1, and 3.5 date stamped 12/28/16, and site plan and elevation sheets 2.0,
3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 date stamped 01/18/17 except as amended by conditions
herein.

4. Freestanding signs M-1 and P-2 shall be removed and/or demolished prior to the
issuance of a building permit for freestanding sign P-3.

5. Off-premise signage shall not be permitted on the subject site.

6. All sign animation shall conform to the Animated Signs Containing a Changeable
Electronic Message provisions identified in Title 19.08.120(B)(11).

7. Any future amendments to the approved signage within the Master Sign Plan in
conformance with the Master Sign Plan and new signage in conformance with Title
19 standards may be reviewed and approved administratively by the Department
of Planning.

8. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

9. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

11. The proposed signs shall not be located within the public right-ofway, interfere
with pedestrian access paths or interfere with Site Visibility Restriction Zones. The
proposed ground mounted bases shall not be located within existing or proposed
public sewer or drainage easements.

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for a Master Sign Plan for an existing Hotel/Casino and its proposed
expansion at 2411 West Sahara Avenue.

ISSUES

A Master Sign Plan is required for any non-restricted gaming establishment


whose signage is not otherwise subject to review by the Downtown Design
Review Committee. This Master Sign Plan was also required per the conditions
of approval for a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
64875). Staff recommends approval.
A Variance has been requested to allow existing and proposed freestanding
signs to exceed the allowed maximums for height and sign area. The request is
to allow 11,437 SF of freestanding sign area where 7,880 SF is the maximum
permitted, and to allow a 175 foot-tall freestanding sign where 40 feet is the
maximum allowed. Staff recommends approval.
A Variance has been requested to allow portions of seven proposed wall signs to
extend up to 108 inches above the top of a wall or parapet where 12 inches is the
maximum allowed. Staff recommends approval.
Per the approved phasing plan associated with SDR-64875, the site expansion
will occur in three phases (1A, 1B and 2).
28 existing incidental, directional, and freestanding signs will remain at their
current location throughout the proposed hotel/casino expansion.
Two existing directional signs will be relocated with Phase 2 of the proposed
expansion.
18 incidental, directional, wall and freestanding signs will be removed during the
various phases of the hotel/casino expansion.
40 new incidental, directional, wall, marquee and freestanding signs are
proposed with the various phases of the proposed expansion.

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

ANALYSIS

In 2016, the City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64875) for a
176,693 square-foot, phased expansion to an existing hotel/casino, which includes a
new hotel tower and exterior faade improvements. A Master Sign Plan is required for
any non-restricted gaming establishment whose signage is not otherwise subject to
review by the Downtown Design Review Committee. This Master Sign Plan was also
required per a condition of approval associated with the aforementioned Site
Development Plan Review. The subject site is not located within any master or special
plan area, and Title 19.08 commercial sign standards apply.

The proposed Master Sign Plan identifies existing and proposed signage for the
hotel/casino and its planned phased expansion. The approved phasing plan indicates
three future phases (1A, 1B and 2) to the proposed expansion. The Master Sign Table
identifies 28 existing incidental, directional, and freestanding signs that will remain at
their current locations. 18 incidental, directional, wall and freestanding signs will be
removed during the various phases of the hotel/casino expansion, and two existing
directional signs will be relocated with Phase 2 of the proposed expansion. 40 new
signs are proposed with the various expansion phases, and a detailed table depicting all
of the existing and proposed signage has been included within the background
information section of this report.

Three separate Variance requests have been submitted in conjunction with the Master
Sign Plan application; however, because the standards being varied are from the same
section of code, only one Variance application is required. The Variance has been
submitted to provide relief from the maximum height and sign area requirements for
existing and proposed freestanding signs, and to allow proposed wall signs to project
more than 12 inches from the top of the roofline or parapet.

Title 19.08 allows a maximum freestanding sign height of 40 feet and a maximum
cumulative sign face area equating to two square feet per each linear-foot of street
frontage. There are currently two legally non-conforming freestanding signs on the
subject property (Signs P-1 and P-2) which exceed current Title 19.08 height and sign
area maximums. Sign P-1, located on the Sahara frontage, is 84 feet tall with a sign
area of 2,761square feet. Sign P-2, located along Rancho Drive, is 126 feet tall with a
sign area of 5,322 square feet.

The subject site has approximately 3,940 linear feet of street frontage which would allow
for 7,880 square feet of total freestanding sign area. The two existing freestanding
signs have a total of 8,083 square feet of sign area. A third freestanding sign (Sign M-
1) located along Rancho Drive is eight feet tall with a sign area of 180 square-feet. If
these signs were held to current standards, the existing sign area would exceed Title
19.08 requirements by 383 square feet, and the maximum height requirements would
be exceeded by 44 (P-1) and 86 (P-2) feet.

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

With the future phase two expansion of the hotel/casino, the applicant proposes to
remove sign P-2 and replace it with freestanding sign P-3 along the Rancho frontage.
The proposed P-3 freestanding sign is 175 feet tall with an area of 8,400 square feet,
which is 49 feet taller and 3,078 square feet larger than the existing P-2 sign. The total
combined area of Signs P-1 and P-3 is 11,161 square feet where 7,880 square feet is
the maximum allowed. The sign will be illuminated and animated with an LED display.
Residential protection standards do not apply as the sign will be over 200 feet from
residentially zoned property. Conditions of approval has been added to ensure that on
premise signage is not used for off premise advertising, and that sign animation
conforms to current city codes.

Title 19.08 requires that freestanding signs along the same street frontage be spaced at
least 100 feet apart. The location of proposed sign P-2 is approximately 20 feet from
existing freestanding sign M-1. The Master Sign Plan indicates that sign M-1 will be
removed with future Phase 2 expansion, alleviating any distance separation conflicts
between sign P-2 and M-1. If the requested Variance is approved, the removal of Sign
P-2 and M-1 will be required prior to the construction of Sign P-3 in order to conform to
the sign area limits imposed by the Variance and sign separation requirements of Title
19.08. A condition of approval has been included to ensure compliance with this
requirement.

While freestanding sign P-3 is 135 feet taller than Title 19.08 height maximums, its
scale is consistent and compatible with the proposed 335-foot hotel tower that will be
constructed during the same expansion phase of the hotel/casino. The existing 126-
foot freestanding sign P-1, which is currently located along the same street frontage, will
be removed prior to the construction of P-3. The scope of the proposed hotel
expansion, along with its location adjacent to an interstate highway, justifies replacing
the existing freestanding sign with a larger and more visible sign.

The final Variance request is to allow seven wall signs to extend up to 108 inches above
the parapet or roof line where the maximum allowable projection is 12 inches. Signs 18,
19, 20, 22 and 23 are wall signs located in various locations that extend 108 inches
above the roof line. Wall signs 2 and 3 extend 72 and 36 inches above the roof line,
respectively. While these signs exceed the maximum allowed by code, the effects of
the projection are minimized when taken into context with the existing and proposed
hotel towers that are set back from the wall that the proposed signage is attached to.

Staff recommends approval of the Variance and Master Sign Plan as all proposed signs
are consistent with a hotel/casino project of this scope. The signs are located in
satisfactory locations that do not adversely impact commercial or residential properties
in the immediate vicinity.

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (VAR-68150)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

The freestanding and wall sign Variances are justified for the existing hotel/casino and its
associated expansion. The proposed signs exceed the maximum projection above the
wall or parapet allowed by code, but the effects of the projection are minimized when taken
into context with the existing and proposed hotel towers that are set back from the wall that
the proposed signage is attached to. The proposed 175-foot freestanding sign is
compatible in scale with the 335-foot tall tower expansion proposed with the Phase 2
expansion. The scope of the proposed hotel expansion and tower justifies replacing the
existing nonconforming freestanding sign along the Rancho Drive frontage with a larger
and more visible sign. Staff recommends approval of the Variance request.

FINDINGS (MSP-68152)

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a rezoning (Z-50-60) to C-1 (Limited
11/16/60 Commercial) and R-4 (Apartment Residence) as part of a larger
request.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a Variance (V-27-73) for a
05/24/73 450-unit motel in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) and R-4 (Apartment
Residence) zoning districts.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a Special Use Permit (U-
05/23/74
27-74) to allow a 253-unit motel.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a Plot Plan Review for a
08/25/83
66,000 square-foot expansion to an existing hotel/casino.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-17-83) to C-1 (Limited
04/06/83
Commercial) on a portion of the subject site.
The Planning commission approved a Plot Plan review for a 25,000
01/28/86
square-foot expansion to an existing hotel/casino
The City Council approved a Variance (V-75-89) to allow a reduction in
09/06/89
parking by 303 spaces.
The City Council approved a reclassification of property from R-
09/06/89
4(Apartment Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial).
The Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a Variance (V-148-92) to
03/23/93
allow 3,729 parking spaces where 4,091 are required.
The City Council approved a plot plan and building elevation review (Z-
03/25/93
64-89) to allow an addition to an existing hotel casino.
The City Council approved a Plot Plan review [Z-64-89(1)] for a
04/21/93
proposed new tower expansion to an existing hotel/casino.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a Variance (V-56-94) to
05/24/94
allow 4,009 parking spaces where 5,580 are required.
The City Council approved a plot plan and building elevation review [Z-
06/01/94 64-89(3)] for a hotel tower expansion and new parking garage for an
existing hotel/casino.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-43991)
to establish Redevelopment Area 2 and designate a parcel on the
04/18/12
subject site as MXU (Mixed-Use) as a part of a larger request. Staff
and the Planning Commission had recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-47819) to allow a 50-foot
flag pole on the roof of an existing building where 40 feet is the
03/20/13
maximum allowed. Staff and the Planning Commission had
recommended approval.

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Las Vegas Redevelopment Board held a public hearing to discuss
the removal of a portion of the site (APN: 162-08-602-005) from the
07/20/16
Redevelopment Plan Area 2. Department of Economic and Urban
Development staff supports this request.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-64870)
from H (High Density Residential), M (Medium Density Residential)
and MXU (Mixed Use) to SC (Service Commercial), a Rezoning (ZON-
64871) from R-4 (High Density Residential) to C-1 (Limited
Commercial), Special Use Permits (SUP-64872, 64873, and 64874) to
expand the Gaming Establishment, Non-Restricted use by 42,252
09/17/16 square feet, to allow a 335-foot hotel tower where 175 feet is the
maximum allowed within this area of the Airport Overly District, and to
allow a hotel within a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district, a Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-64875)for a 176,693 square-foot
expansion to an existing hotel/casino, and a Tentative Map (TMP-
64882) for a one-lot commercial subdivision. Staff and the Planning
Commission recommended approval on 08/02/16.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held and general Master Sign Plan and
12/29/17
Variance application requirement were discussed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required nor was one held.

Field Check
The subject site is developed with a hotel/casino, parking garages and
01/05/16
surface parking areas.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 30.50

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation

Subject SC (Service C-1(Limited


Hotel/Casino
Property Commercial) Commercial)

Restaurant, Retail, SC (Service C-1 (Limited


North
Medical Office Commercial) Commercial)
R-4 (High Density
South MXU (Mixed Use) MXU (Mixed Use)
Residential)
East I-15 / Right-of-Way N/A N/A
R-4 (High Density
H (High Density
Multi-family Residential), R-1
West Residential), (MXU)
Residential (Single-Family
Mixed Use
Residential)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

SIGN SUMMARY

Proposed Freestanding Signs: [19.08.120]


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
1 sign per each two hundred
Maximum lineal feet of street frontage or 1 / Street frontage Yes
Number portion thereof. 3,940 linear ft. 3 signs total
frontage = 19 signs allowed

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Proposed Freestanding Signs: [19.08.120]


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
2 square feet of sign area for
each lineal foot of street
Maximum Area frontage. 3,940 linear ft. 11,437 sf No*
frontage = 7,880 sq. ft. of
permissible sign area.
Maximum
40 feet 175 feet No*
Height
Minimum 5 feet from
5 feet from property line Yes
Setback property line
LED, External,
Illumination LED, External, Internal Yes
Internal
*A Variance for sign area and height have been submitted as a part of this request.

Proposed Wall Signs: [19.08.120]


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
No specific limit on the number
Maximum Number of signs, although total area 43 wall signs Yes
limits apply
The total amount of wall
signage allowed per building
elevation is equivalent to 20%
Maximum Area of the building elevation. 20% 18,578 sf Yes
of 94,898 sf building area (not
including towers) = 18,979
allowable wall sign area.
Signs 2, 18,
19, 20, 22
A wall sign shall not extend
and 23
more than 12 inches above
Maximum Projection extend up to No*
top of wall, marquee or
108 inches
parapet to which it is attached
from the top
of wall
Internal/External as long as
Illumination not within 200 feet of property Yes Yes
zoned for residential.
*A Variance for sign projection has been submitted as a part of this request.

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Marquee Signs: [19.08.120]


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
1 marquee
sign per
1 marquee sign per building
Maximum Number building Yes
elevation
elevation (4
total)
Less than
20% of the
20% of the building elevation building
Maximum Area Yes
to which it is attached. elevation to
which it is
attached
Internal, external, animated,
Illumination Internal Yes
and electric message unit.

Incidental Signs (Directional) [19.08.120]


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
2 per driveway or vehicular
access except that any such
Maximum Number sign not legible from the 24 signs Yes
public right-of-way shall not
be counted in this limitation
12 sf or less
for all
proposed
directional
signs; Existing
Maximum Area 12 sf Yes
signs are
legally
nonconforming
and are up to
16 sf
7ft. or less for
all proposed
Maximum Height 7 ft. Yes
directional
signs
Illumination Internal only Internal Yes

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Ten
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Incidental Signs (Non-Directional) [19.08.120]


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number No specific limit 5 signs Yes
350 sf; All non-
directional signs
4 square feet if set back
are existing and
less than 30 feet from the
are considered
public right-of-way; 9
Maximum Area legally Yes
square feet if set back 30 or
nonconforming.
more feet from the public
No new non-
right-of-way
directional signs
are proposed.
Illumination Internal only None Yes

Variances
Sign Key Request Staff Recommendation
To allow portions of a wall sign to
extend up to 108 inches above
2, 18, 19, 20, 22 and
the top of a wall or parapet where Approval
23
12 inches is the maximum
permitted.
To allow 11,437 sf of freestanding
P-1 and P-3 sign area where 7,880 sf is the Approval
maximum permitted.
To allow a 175 foot-tall
P-1 and P-3 freestanding sign where 40 feet is Approval
the maximum allowed.

EXISTING SIGNAGE TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED

Sign Sign Type Height Area (SF) Comments


Key (feet)
SD-5 Directional 6 14 To be relocated with Phase 2
SD-6 Directional 6 16 To be relocated with Phase 2
To be removed with Phase 2. Sign must
P-2 Freestanding 126 5,322 be removed prior to the installation of
sign P-3

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Eleven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Sign Sign Type Height Area (SF) Comments


Key (feet)
To be removed with Phase 2. Sign must
M-1 Freestanding 8 180 be removed prior to the installation of
sign P-3
B-1 Wall 2 24 To be removed with Phase 2

B-2 Wall 3.5 53 To be removed with Phase 1B

B-3 Wall 5.5 267 To be removed with Phase 1B

B-4 Wall 2.5 27 To be removed with Phase 1B

B-5.0 Wall 3.5 64 To be removed with Phase 1B

B-5.1 Wall 5.5 267 To be removed with Phase 1B

B-5.2 Wall 3 86 To be removed with Phase 1B

B-6 Wall 3 86 To be removed with Phase 1A

B-6.1 Wall 3 86 To be removed with Phase 1A

B-7 Wall 8.5 69 To be removed with Phase 1A

B-8 Wall 3.5 99 To be removed with Phase 1A

B-8.1 Wall 3 75 To be removed with Phase 1A

CY-1 Incidental 1 7 To be removed with Phase 2

CY-2 Incidental 1 7 To be removed with Phase 2

CY-3 Incidental 1 7 To be removed with Phase 2


G-5 Incidental 13.5 350 To be removed with Phase 2

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Twelve
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

EXISTING SIGNAGE TO REMAIN

Sign Sign Type Height Area (SF) Illumination Animated


Key (feet)
SD-1 Directional 6 14 Internal No

SD-2 Directional 6 14 Internal No

SD-3 Directional 6 14 Internal No


SD-4 Directional 6 16 Internal No

SD-7 Directional 6 14 Internal No

SD-8 Directional 6 14 Internal No


SD-9 Directional 6 14 Internal No

SD-10 Directional 6 16 Internal No

SD-11 Directional 6 16 Internal No

SD-12 Directional 6 14 Internal No

SD-13 Directional 6 6 Internal No

SD-14 Directional 6 6 Internal No

SD-15 Directional 6 16 Internal No

V-1 Directional 1.6 6 Internal No


V-2 Directional 1.6 6 Internal No
V-3 Directional 1.6 6 Internal No
P-1 Freestanding 84 2,761 Internal Yes
B-9 Marquee 2.3 70 Internal No
B-10 Marquee 1 79 None No

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

B-11 Marquee 1 69 None No


B-12 Wall 2.1 14 Internal No
T-1 Roof 13 1,543 Internal Yes

T-2 Roof 13 1,543 Internal Yes

G-1 Incidental 4 350 Neon No

G-1.1 Incidental 4 110 Neon No


G-2 Incidental 4 110 Neon No
G-3 Incidental 13.5 110 Neon No
G-4 Incidental 13.5 350 Neon No

NEW PROPOSED SIGNAGE

Heig
Sign Area Illuminatio Variance
Sign Type ht Animated Comments
Key (SF) n Required
(feet)
LED
1 Wall 13 442 Yes No N/A
Display
LED
1.1 Wall 13 416 Yes No N/A
Display
Extends 60
inches
above the
wall to which
LED
2 Wall 32 576 Yes Yes it is attached
Display
where 12
inches is the
maximum
allowed
Extends 36
inches
above the
wall to which
LED
3 Wall 24 720 Yes Yes it is attached
Display
where 12
inches is the
maximum
allowed

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Fourteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Sign Sign Type Heig Area Illuminatio Animated Variance Comments


Key ht (SF) n Required
(feet)
4 Wall 4 65 Internal No No N/A
Directional Not visible
5 2 20 Internal No No
from ROW
Directional Not visible
5.1 2 20 Internal No No
from ROW
Directional Not visible
5.2 2 20 Internal No No
from ROW
6A Marquee 4 77 Internal No No N/A
6B Marquee 4 77 Internal No No N/A
Not visible
7 Wall 20 1,700 None No No
from ROW
8A Wall 4.5 192 Internal No No N/A

8B Wall 1.8 27 Internal No No N/A


8C Wall 3 27 Internal No No N/A
LED
9A Wall 15 375 Yes No N/A
Display
LED
9B Wall 15 75 Yes No N/A
Display

10 Wall 10 85 Internal No No N/A

LED
11 Wall 10 500 Yes No N/A
Display
LED
11.1 Wall 10 543 Yes No N/A
Display
12 Wall 5 124 Internal No No N/A
13 Wall 6 169 Internal No No N/A

LED
14 Wall 20 960 Yes No N/A
Display

15 Wall 6 208 Internal No No N/A

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Fifteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Sign Sign Type Heig Area Illuminatio Animated Variance Comments


Key ht (SF) n Required
(feet)
17 Wall 2.5 79 Internal No No N/A

17.1 Wall 6 502 Internal No No N/A


Extends 108
inches
above the
wall to which
18 Wall 19 1,178 Internal No Yes it is attached
where 12
inches is the
maximum
allowed
Extends 108
inches
above the
wall to which
19 Wall 19 1,178 Internal No Yes it is attached
where 12
inches is the
maximum
allowed
Extends 108
inches
above the
wall to which
20 Wall 19 77 Internal No Yes it is attached
where 12
inches is the
maximum
allowed
21 Wall 4 1,178 Internal No No N/A

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Sixteen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Sign Sign Type Heig Area Illuminatio Animated Variance Comments


Key ht (SF) n Required
(feet)
Extends 108
inches
above the
wall to which
22 Wall 19 1,178 Internal No Yes it is attached
where 12
inches is the
maximum
allowed
Extends 108
inches
above the
wall to which
23 Wall 19 69 Internal No Yes it is attached
where 12
inches is the
maximum
allowed
24 Wall 5 126 Internal No No N/A

25 Wall 4 77 Internal No No N/A

T3 Wall 15 968 Internal No No N/A

T4 Wall 15 968 Internal No No N/A


SD-
Directional 7 12 Internal No No N/A
16

SD-
Directional 7 12 Internal No No N/A
17

SD-
Directional 7 12 Internal No No N/A
18

SD-
Directional 7 12 Internal No No N/A
19

FS
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 [PRJ-68149]
Staff Report Page Seventeen
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Sign Sign Type Heig Area Illuminatio Animated Variance Comments


Key ht (SF) n Required
(feet)
SD-
Directional 7 12 Internal No No N/A
20
175-foot
height where
80 feet is the
maximum
allowed for
signs
P-3 adjacent to
(Sig Free- LED an elevated
175 8,400 Yes Yes
n standing Display freeway.
16) Signs P-2
and M-1
must be
removed
prior to the
installation
Sign P-3

FS
VAR-68150



VAR-68150

VAR-68150 and MSP-68152



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED



VAR-68150 and MSP-68152


VAR-68150 [PRJ-68149] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-68152 - APPLICANT/OWNER: NP PALACE, LLC
2411 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17
VAR-68150 [PRJ-68149] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-68152 - APPLICANT/OWNER: NP PALACE, LLC
2411 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17
VAR-68150 [PRJ-68149] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-68152 - APPLICANT/OWNER: NP PALACE, LLC
2411 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17
VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED

VAR-68150 and MSP-68152 - REVISED


Agenda Item No.: 32.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
MSP-68152 - MASTER SIGN PLAN RELATED TO VAR-68150 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: NP PALACE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Master Sign
Plan FOR AN EXISTING HOTEL/CASINO on 30.05 acres at 2411 West Sahara Avenue (APNs
Multiple), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-68149]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
MSP-68152



MSP-68152


Agenda Item No.: 33.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68319 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DAPPER DEVELOPMENT -
OWNER: TEN15 NOVAT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
116 PARKING SPACES WHERE 132 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.88 acres at the
northwest corner of Cliff Shadows Parkway and Novat Street (APN 137-12-410-014), PD
(Planned Community) Zone [VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain Special Land Use
Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68218]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 8 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68216]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68216]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68216]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68216]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68216]
6. Protest/Support Postcards - VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DAPPER DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: TEN15
NOVAT, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-68319 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
SDR-68318 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-68319
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 30

NOTICES MAILED 638

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 8

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68319 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-68318) shall be required.

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
60353) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-63013), except as amended
herein.

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-68318 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


68319) shall be required.

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
60353) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-63013).

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, date
stamped 12/27/16 and building elevations, date stamped 01/19/17, except as
amended by conditions herein.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

7. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

9. An update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage


Study must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior
to submittal of any construction drawings or the issuance of any building or grading
permits, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways
recommended in the approved drainage study update.

10. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for SDR-
60353 and all other applicable site-related actions.

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a parking Variance and a Site Development Plan Review for
a proposed 3,410 square-foot building for a Restaurant with Drive-Through use at the
northwest corner of Cliff Shadows Parkway and Novat Street.

ISSUES

A Restaurant with Drive-Through use is permitted in the VC (Village Commercial)


Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation.
A Variance is needed to allow 116 parking spaces where 132 spaces are required
as a result of adding the Restaurant with Drive-Through use. Staff does not support
this request.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located within the Centennial Hills Sector of the General Plan with a
PCD (Planned Community Development) land use designation. The PD (Planned
Development) zoning district is consistent with the General Plan designation and the
proposed Restaurant with Drive-Through is a permitted use within the PD (Planned
Development) zoning district and the Lone Mountain Master Plan.

The subject property is located within the VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain
Master Plan area. Village Commercial designation allows low to medium intensity retail,
office or other commercial uses that serve primarily local area patrons, and do not
include more intense general commercial characteristics. Village Commercial is
typically located on the periphery of residential neighborhoods and should be confined
to the intersections of major arterials along major retail corridors.

The site plan shows a 3,410 square-foot one-story commercial building to be located at
the remaining undeveloped pad between the office building and a general retail building.
Vehicular site access is from Novat Street, an 80-foot wide public right-of-way.

The submitted landscape plan indicates the landscaping adjacent to the proposed
building is in conformance with the approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
63013).

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The provided elevations demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the Lone
Mountain Master Plan. The Burnt Sienna or Traditional Red Brick finish adequately
wraps around the west side of the building and it is distributed on the south elevation at
the mid-point. The brick finishing is also complimented by a silver corrugated metal
siding. The brick and metal siding are consistent throughout the building elevations.

This project is the third phase of a three-phased one-lot commercial subdivision. This
project will develop the last pad site in the commercial center.

The proposed building will serve as a Restaurant with Drive-Through use. The provided
floor plan shows two suites to be utilized as a restaurant; one of the suites will have a
drive-through associated with it.

Pursuant to Title 19.12, a Restaurant use has a parking requirement which consists of
one space per 50 square feet of public seating and waiting area, plus one for each 200
square feet of the total remaining gross floor area. The subject site does not qualify as
a Shopping Center use, pursuant to Title 19.12. There are two other uses within the
commercial development an Office, Other Than Listed and a General Retail Store.
Each of these uses is calculated according the use. The commercial subdivision
currently contains 116 parking spaces. The proposed Restaurant with Drive-Through
use increases the demand for this development to 132 parking spaces; therefore, the
applicant is requesting a parking Variance.

The proposed 3,410 square-foot commercial building will consist of two suites with
restaurant uses and a drive-through. The building will be constructed on the remaining
pad site located at the center of the commercial lot. The applicant has created a self-
imposed hardship by proposing a Restaurant with Drive-Through use, which increases
the demand for parking; therefore, staff recommends denial. If these are approved,
they are subject to conditions.

FINDINGS (VAR-68319)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance

from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or


hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a Restaurant with Drive-
Through use, which increases the demand for parking. A use that is less parking
intense, such as the retail use that was originally proposed, would allow conformance to
the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the
sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential
in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.

FINDINGS (SDR-68318)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed Restaurant with Drive-Through use is appropriate, in terms of the


type and intensity of permissible uses listed in section 2.4 of the Lone Mountain
Master Plan for areas under the VC (Village Commercial) land use designation.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The Site Development Plan Review is accompanied by a Variance to allow 116


parking spaces where 132 spaces are required. The proposed development does
not meet all development standards outlined in Title 19 for the parking
requirement.

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

The proposed development will be accessed from Novat Street, which is


adequate in size to meet the moderate requirements set forth by this proposal.
No negative impacts to neighborhood traffic are anticipated with this approval.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

The building materials for the proposed commercial building are appropriate for
both the immediate area and the City. The landscape materials are in compliance
with the approved SDR-60353.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly
and are compatible with existing development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed commercial building will be subject to regular inspections for


building and licensing; therefore, the development will not compromise the public
health, safety or welfare.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved Extension of Time requests for a proposed
Supper Club [U-0111-00(1)], Liquor Establishment (Off-Premise
Consumption) [U-0112-01(1)] and Tavern [U-0113-00(1)] on the subject
site. The City Council also approved an Extension of Time request for a
8/07/02
Conceptual Site Development Plan Review [Z-0033-97(31)] for a proposed
commercial center. The office component of the development was
removed by condition. Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval of all items.

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review [Z-0033-
97(34)] for a service station and fast-food restaurant on a 1.69 acre portion
08/21/02 of a larger development site. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval of the request. (This Site Development Plan
Review expired on 08/21/04.)
The City Council approved Extension of Time requests for a proposed
Supper Club (EOT-4446), Liquor Establishment (Off-Premise
7/07/04 Consumption) (EOT-4448), Tavern (EOT-4449), and a Conceptual Site
Development Plan Review (EOT-4578) on the subject site. Staff
recommended approval of all items.
The Department of Planning administratively approved a Wireless
7/18/03 Communication Facility (Stealth Design), to be located within a 60-foot
flagpole on the subject site.
The Department of Planning approved an Administrative Site Development
11/10/04 Plan Review (SDR-4556) for a commercial development on the subject
site.
The City Council approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-8642) as a request for
10/20/05 an amendment to an approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-0002-02). The
Planning Commission recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved the request for a Major Modification (MOD-
10791) to the Lone Mountain Master Development Plan to allow a
3/01/06 Financial Institution, General with Drive-Through in the VC (Village
Commercial) Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the request.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-21198) for a proposed 10,052 square-foot Financial Institution,
05/24/07
General with Drive-Through on 1.06 acres at 3307 Novat Street. Staff
recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-60353) for a proposed 10,025 square-foot Commercial Building at
09/08/15
3375 Novat Street. The Department of Planning staff recommended
approval.
The Department of Planning administratively approved a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-63013) of a previously approved Site Development
01/27/16 Plan Review (SDR-60353) for the addition of four parking spaces and a
reconfiguration of the parking lot design to allow for two additional
handicapped parking spaces at 3375 Novat Street.

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Most Recent Change of Ownership


08/02/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#95628) was issued for a bank building at 3303 Novat
01/31/08
Street. The permit was finalized on 08/07/14.
A building permit (#257947) was issued for a tenant improvement at 3303
05/01/14
Novat Street. The permit was finalized on 12/31/14.
A business license (G62-06282) was issued for a law office at 3303 Novat
07/14/14
Street. The license is currently active.
A business license (G62-07955) was issued for a law office at 3303 Novat
09/15/14
Street. The license is currently active.
A building permit (#311646) was issued for a retail shell building at 3375
06/13/16
Novat Street. The permit was finalized on 10/13/16.
A building permit (#313564) was issued for a retail tenant improvement
08/30/16
build out at 3375 Novat Street. The permit was finalized on 11/03/16.
A business license (G64-07563) was issued for a retail variety store at
11/22/16
3375 Novat Street. The license is currently active.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff met with the applicants proposed commercial building requires a Site
Development Plan Review application. Since the Restaurant with Drive-
12/19/16 Through use will increase the demand for parking within the commercial
subdivision and a parking Variance is needed to allow 116 spaces on the
site where 132 spaces are required.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a field check of the subject site and noted that the commercial
01/05/17
center is well maintained.

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net
Acres 0.88

Existing Land
Use Per Title Planned or Special
Surrounding
19.12 or Lone Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property
Mountain Master Designation
Plan
VC (Village
Subject
Undeveloped Commercial Lone PD (Planned Development)
Property
Mountain Land Use)
General Retail VC (Village
North Store, Other than Commercial Lone PD (Planned Development)
Listed Mountain Land Use)
VC (Village
Office, Other than
South Commercial Lone PD (Planned Development)
Listed
Mountain Land Use)
VC (Village
East Shopping Center Commercial Lone PD (Planned Development)
Mountain Land Use)
MFM (Multi-Family
Medium Lone
West Undeveloped U (Undeveloped)
Mountain West Land
Use Designation)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Lone Mountain Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
PD (Planned Development) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to the Lone Mountain Master Plan and Title 19.08, the following standards
apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front 20 Feet 126 Feet Y
Rear 10 Feet 30 Feet Y
Max. Building Height 35 Feet 20 Feet Y
Screened and
Trash Enclosure Y
Screened and enclosed enclosed
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification of Street Width with Street
Document
Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets
Novat Street Major Collector and Highways 80 Y
Map

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Complia
Gross Required Provided nce
Use Floor Area Parking Parking
Parking
or Number Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
of Units capped capped
Office,
Other than 9,610 SF 1/300 SF 33
Listed
General
Retail
Store, 10,025 SF 1/175 SF 58
Other than
Listed

RG
VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 [PRJ-68218]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Parking Requirement
Complia
Gross Required Provided nce
Use Floor Area Parking Parking
Parking
or Number Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
of Units capped capped
Suite A 1/50 SF 9
438 SF seating
area and
1,098 SF 1/200 SF 6
remaining
gross floor
Restaurant area
(Proposed) Suite B 1/50 SF 21
1,038 SF seating
area and
836 SF 1/200 SF 5
remaining
gross floor
area
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 132 116 N
Regular and Handicap Spaces N
127 5 109 7
Required
Percent Deviation (for VAR only) 12%

RG
VAR-68319



VAR-68319

VAR-68319 and SDR-68318


A

747
7 A77

7A77 7

b77 bA

7AbAbA 7
A7
7bA

7
7b7
7bA
777777

7 777b7

7bbA7 7A
7

(A7A 7A
7

7 77 7A
7

7
Abb
A 7A
7

777777
A 7

A
A
7 7A

A
A
7777777777

7

b77b7 7A

b7
7777777A777

7A7Ab7AbA77b77
A77A7A
7
77(



7777777A7A7777

7
7

7777777
77 7(


7 7

7
77

777(

7
7
7

777



A7A7AA77


7

A77A77
A77A77A


7
7b

b7
(
(7

A7 bb7



7A

A7


7
7

bA

7
A

A7

777A77A77A7AA7 7
AbA7A7
7777

AbA

7777777777777777777777b77777777777777777777777777777
A7A

VAR-68319 and SDR-68318


VAR-68319 and SDR-68318

VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 - REVISED


7777777777777777777777b77777777777777777777777777777
bA7
bA7

7
A bA7A777b7

b7 7A77b777bA7A

b
b

A
A

b7 77b77A777AA7

7 b7A
7 b7A

VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 - REVISED



b
b

A
A



7b A A

bA
A77A77

A7

7A

7
A
b7



A
A77A77A
7777777777
7777777A7A7777

A7
777

bb7
7777777 A777

7A

A7A7AA77
A7A

VAR-68319 and SDR-68318 - REVISED



VAR-68319 and SDR-68318


VAR-68319 [PRJ-68218] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-68318 - APPLICANT: DAPPER DEVELOPMENT - OWNER:
TEN15 NOVAT, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CLIFF SHADOWS PARKWAY AND NOVAT STREET
01/05/17
VAR-68319 [PRJ-68218] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-68318 - APPLICANT: DAPPER DEVELOPMENT - OWNER:
TEN15 NOVAT, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CLIFF SHADOWS PARKWAY AND NOVAT STREET
01/05/17
VAR-68319 [PRJ-68218] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-68318 - APPLICANT: DAPPER DEVELOPMENT - OWNER:
TEN15 NOVAT, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CLIFF SHADOWS PARKWAY AND NOVAT STREET
01/05/17
77

b7777
777
77777

7 77777&bA7
7 7A777

77777777777777
77777777777777
77777b7707777777
7777777

A777777b7777777070
777777b7077A7A7777
77777

7777777777777777
7777777777A777
7777777777777777A707
777777777777777

7777777777777
77b07b

77777770777777
7777707777A77777
777777777

770777777777777
077777777777777777
77777777777077777777
777777

7A777A77

77777777 77 7777777 7

VAR-68319 and SDR-68318



VAR-68319 and SDR-68318



VAR-68319 and SDR-68318



VAR-68319 and SDR-68318



VAR-68319 and SDR-68318



VAR-68319 and SDR-68318


Agenda Item No.: 34.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68318 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-68319 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: DAPPER DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: TEN15 NOVAT, LLC -
For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 3,410
SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING on 0.88 acres at the northwest corner of Cliff
Shadows Parkway and Novat Street (APN 137-12-410-014), PD (Planned Development) Zone
[VC (Village Commercial) Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony)
[PRJ-68218]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 8 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SDR-68318



SDR-68318


SDR 68318
Dapper Development

NWC Cliff Shadows Parkway & Novat Street


Proposed 3.41 thousand square foot restaurant building.

First Existing Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 42.70 428


SHOPPING CENTER/GENERAL RETAIL
AM Peak Hour [1000 SF]
10.025 0.96 10
PM Peak Hour 3.71 37

Second Existing Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11.03 106


AM Peak Hour GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF] 9.61 1.56 15
PM Peak Hour 1.49 14

First Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 496.12 930


FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
AM Peak Hour SF]
1.874 45.42 85
PM Peak Hour 32.65 61

Second Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 716.00 1,100


AM Peak Hour FAST-FOOD W/O DRIVE-THRU [1000 SF] 1.536 43.87 67
PM Peak Hour 26.15 40

Total Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 496.12 2,030


FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
AM Peak Hour SF]
3.41 45.42 153
PM Peak Hour 32.65 101

Total Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 42.70 2,564


SHOPPING CENTER/GENERAL RETAIL
AM Peak Hour [1000 SF]
23.045 0.96 178
PM Peak Hour 3.71 152

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Cliff Shadows Parkway
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 14,459
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,157
Novat Street
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,161
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 93

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Cliff Shadows Parkway 33,800
Novat Street 16,380

This project will add approximately 2,030 trips per day on Cliff Shadows Pkwy. and Novat St. Currently, Cliff Shadows is at
about 43 percent of capacity and Novat is at about 7 percent of capacity. With this project, Cliff Shadows is expected to be
at about 46 percent of capacity and Novat to be at about 13 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 153 additional cars, or about five every two
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Agenda Item No.: 35.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68568 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TAL HAREL - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW TWO PARKING SPACES WHERE
FOUR ARE REQUIRED on 0.08 acres located on the west side of 14th Street approximately
415 feet south of Mesquite Avenue, (APN 139-35-212-021), R-3 (Medium Density Residential)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68565]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
6. Comment - VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: TAL HAREL

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-68568 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
VAR-68554 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 33

NOTICES MAILED 235

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

NE
VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68568 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance VAR-


68575 shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

VAR-68575 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance VAR-


68568 shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

NE
VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

NE
VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a side setback Variance to allow a two-and-a-half-foot setback


where five feet is the minimum required, and for a parking Variance to allow two parking
spaces where four parking spaces are required for a duplex proposed for an
undeveloped lot located on the west side of 14th Street, approximately 415 south of
Mesquite Avenue. The Assessors Parcel Number (APN) is 139-35-212-021.

ISSUES

A Variance is required to allow two parking spaces where four is the minimum
required. Staff is recommending denial.
A Variance is required to allow a two-and-a-half-foot side setback where five feet is
the minimum required. Staff is recommending denial.

ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed to develop a duplex, consisting of two, three-bedroom


units. Each unit will have a single car garage, necessitating the need for a parking
Variance since Title 19.12 requires two parking spaces for each unit. The first floor unit
has 1,297 square feet of livable space, with the second floor unit having 1,313 square
feet of livable floor area. The second floor unit also has an outdoor deck area of 319
square feet. The applicant has requested a Variance to allow a two-and-a-half-foot (2.5)
setback along portions of the southern property line to accommodate the proposed
building footprint.

The subject site is a triangular shaped lot located on the west side of 14 th Street
approximately 415 feet south of Mesquite Avenue. The subject site was left with the
current triangular configuration after a portion of the lot was dedicated for right-of-way
for the expansion of US-95. The remaining lot size is approximately 0.08 acres, or 3,484
square feet.

With a zoning designation of R-3 (Medium Density Residential), having a lot size of
3,484 square feet makes the subject site a legal, nonconforming lot in regards to the lot
size. The R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district has a minimum lot size
requirement of 6,500 square feet. The development of a duplex on a lot that is smaller
than many single-family residential lots, and which requires the approval of multiple
Variances, indicates that the site will be over-built. Staff recommends denial of both
Variances.
NE
VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS FOR PARKING VARIANCE (VAR-68568)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to over build the site.
Alternative site design would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of
the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is
concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside
the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances. Staff is recommending denial
of this request.

FINDINGS FOR SETBACK VARIANCE (VAR-68575)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

NE
VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to over build the site.
Alternative site design would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of
the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is
concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside
the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances. Staff is recommending denial
of this request

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


A complaint was filed with Code Enforcement (#170122) for a vagrant
08/29/16 camp on parcel number 139-35-212-021. The complaint was resolved
on 08/30/16.

Most Recent Change of Ownership for 139-35-212-021


11/06/14 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


05/23/16 Civil Improvement Plans (#64745) were submitted for review.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff coordinated with the applicant through email and telephone calls
01/11/17 &
to complete the pre-application process and obtain the necessary
01/12/17
paperwork to meet the submittal deadline.

NE
VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine field check performed by staff, the vacant
01/25/17
undeveloped lot was observed with motor vehicles parked on the site.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.08

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject R-3 (Medium Density
Undeveloped MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Residential)
Single Family, R-3 (Medium Density
North MXU (Mixed Use)
Attached Residential)
South US-95 Right-of-Way Right-of-Way
Church/House of R-3 (Medium Density
East MXU (Mixed Use)
Worship Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
West Undeveloped MXU (Mixed Use)
Residential)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Downtown Redevelopment Area N
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

NE
VAR-68568 and VAR-68575 [PRJ-68565]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 19.06, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 6,500 SF 3,484 SF N*
Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
Side 5 Feet 2.5 Feet N**
Corner N/A N/A N/A
Rear 20 Feet 24.75 Feet Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 10 Feet N/A N/A
Max. Lot Coverage N/A N/A N/A
2 Stories
Max. Building Height 5 Stories Y
(23 Feet)
*The subject site is a legal, nonconforming lot in regards to lot size.
**The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a 2.5-foot side setback where 5 feet is
required.

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:


LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
In accordance with Title 19.06 for the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district, when
the building setbacks are less restrictive, the setbacks shall prevail. The building setbacks
are the prevailing landscape buffer widths in this instance.

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
14th Street Local Title 13 35 Y

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Single 2 Spaces
Family, Per Dwelling 2 Units 4
Attached Unit
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 4 2 N
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 4 2 N
Percent Deviation (for VAR only) 50%

NE
VAR-68568



VAR-68568



7A7A


77777

7b 77bb7b
b7A 7 7A7


7A

77bb7Ab


b77
A7


77bb7Ab
7
b77
A7
7

77bb7Ab
b77
A7


777bA7








777

Ab
77


Ab
A7
7

7b
b7A
7A
77777

7
A
A


77
7
A7A7

7777A7b777A7A7bbA7A777b7A7777777A77bb77b77b777A7A7777bb77A77b

7A
7 bA77777777

7A
A 7

A7A7

A7


bbA

A
A7bbA
7A
A

VAR-68568 and VAR-68575




VAR-68568 and VAR-68575


VAR-68568 and VAR-68575


VAR-68568 and VAR-68575


VAR-68568 and VAR-68575
VAR-68568 [PRJ-68565] - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-68575 - APPLICANT/OWNER: TAL HAREL
WEST SIDE OF 14TH STREET SOUTH OF MESQUITE AVENUE
01/24/17
VAR-68568 [PRJ-68565] - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-68575 - APPLICANT/OWNER: TAL HAREL
WEST SIDE OF 14TH STREET SOUTH OF MESQUITE AVENUE
01/24/17
VAR-68568 [PRJ-68565] - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-68575 - APPLICANT/OWNER: TAL HAREL
WEST SIDE OF 14TH STREET SOUTH OF MESQUITE AVENUE
01/24/17
January 12, 2017

RE: 14th Street Duplex setback & parking variance


Job No: 15
To Whom It May Concern,

We present the following items as reasons to grant a variance to the subject property:

-(setback variance) Doug Rankin from the city of Las Vegas zoning department deemed
the property a non-conforming lot in an email sent on 1/20/2015. The lot was classified
as such due to the fact that it does not meet the minimum lot size of 6,500 s.f. specified in
the Unified Development Code. The lot is currently 3,551 s.f. Mr. Harel can present a
copy of this email upon request.

-(setback variance) The lot also classifies as irregularly shaped due to the effects of
eminent domain performed at the time of freeway expansion.

-(setback variance) The setback in question has no adjacent neighbor and/or structure that
would be negatively affected by the granting of this variance. Also, the only structure
adjacent to the property line is the freeway which is made of noncombustible material so
life safety/property damage is not an issue. Doug Rankin validated this assertion early on
in the planning process.

-(parking variance) Due to the nonconformance and irregularity of the remaining land
post freeway expansion, it is extremely difficult to meet the parking requirements needed
by the R-3 (medium density residential) criteria.

-(parking variance) There are 4 spaces being provided. 2 in garages and 2 in driveways.
Therefore we are not seeking a waiver for fewer parking spots but, the arrangement of
those spots.

Sincerely,

Joshua K. Warner, RD
President, Josh Warner Residential Design

6465 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 102 Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Ph: (702) 312-3422 jwarner@jwresdesign.com fax: (702) 312-3421

VAR-68568 and VAR-68575


JOSH WARNER RESIDENTIAL DESIGN

6465 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 102 Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Ph: (702) 312-3422 jwarner@jwresdesign.com fax: (702) 312-3421

VAR-68568 and VAR-68575


Agenda Item No.: 36.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68575 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-68568 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: TAL HAREL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW A 2.5-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE FIVE FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.08
acres located on the west side of 14th Street approximately 415 feet south of Mesquite Avenue,
(APN 139-35-212-021), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68565].
Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
VAR-68575



VAR-68575


Agenda Item No.: 37.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68592 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DISCOVERY GARDENS
CHILD CARE - OWNER: DT MARK PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Variance TO ALLOW 10 PARKING SPACES WHERE 19 IS THE MINIMUM
REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL CARE CENTER on 0.69 acres at 555 Page
Street (APN 140-32-102-002), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68572].
Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
6. Protest Postcard - VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DISCOVERY GARDENS CHILD CARE -
OWNER: DT MARK PROPERTIES, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL

VAR-68592 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

SUP-68591 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: VAR-68592

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 27

NOTICES MAILED 389

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 1

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68592 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-68591) shall be required.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SUP-68591 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


68592) shall be required.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. The parking lot must be restriped in conformance with the site plan dated 2/2/17
prior to the issuance of a business license for this use.

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is seeking to reestablish an Individual Care Center (Child Care) in an


existing building at 555 Page Street. The previous Individual Care Center (Child Care)
on the site was approved by a variance which was voided when the use ceased for
twelve months. In order to reestablish the use, it must meet the current requirements of
Title 19 which requires a Special Use Permit for an Individual Care Center in the R-E
(Residence Estates) zoning district, and parking in excess of what is available on the
site.

ISSUES

An Individual Care Center is permitted in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district
with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Staff recommends approval of the Special
Use Permit.
An Individual Care Center requires one parking space for every 10 children and one
parking space for every employee. The proposed Individual Care Center will be
licensed for 84 children and will have 10 employees on the largest shift. Since 19
parking spaces are required, and the site can only provide 10 spaces, the applicant
has requested a Variance. Staff recommends approval of the Variance.

ANALYSIS

The applicant is seeking to reestablish an Individual Care Center (Child Care) in an


existing building at 555 Page Street. The site is developed with a 4,724 square foot,
single story building that was previously used as an Individual Car Center (Child Care).
Variance (V-0091-79) approved the use at a level of 120 children, but the use ceased
operation for several years. Per Title 19.16.140 (O) A Variance to allow a use that is not
permitted in a particular zone shall be void without further action if the use approved by
the Variance ceases for a period of twelve months or more.

The applicant is seeking to reestablish the use, but at a reduced level of 84 children. In
order to do so, the use must conform with the current requirements of Title 19 which
requires a Special Use Permit for an Individual Care Center in the R-E (Residence
Estates) zoning district.

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The Individual Care Center use is defined as A commercial facility which provides
personal care and related services to more than 12 children or dependent adults in a
supervised, protective, congregate setting during some portion of a twenty-four hour
day. Such a use is subject to the care-related regulations and standards of the State of
Nevada. Services typically offered in conjunction with dependent adult care include
social and recreational activities, training, meals, and services such as rehabilitation and
medication assistance. The proposed use meets the definition as they will be seeking
a license to operate a Child Care Center with up to 84 children.

Title 19 does not list any Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use.

The site is accessed from Page Street, a local street, but the site is only 400 feet from
Bonanza Road a Primary Arterial per the Planned Streets and Highways Map. A
circular drive exists on the site and will allow all drop off and pick up to occur on the site.
The use proposed is also less intense than the previous child care use, as it will drop
from a maximum of 120 children to a maximum of 84 children served on the site.

The site plan submitted on 2/2/17 depicts a parking lot with 9 standard spaces and one
van accessible handicapped parking space all with dimensions in conformance with
Title 19. A condition of approval has been included that requires that the parking lot be
striped in accordance with the plan submitted on 2/2/17 prior to the issuance of a
business license for this use.

The site is not adjacent to any residential properties, separated by Page Street from the
nearest residential uses. The site is already developed with screen walls and opaque
fencing to appropriately screen the property from the adjacent commercially zoned
sites.

The site is across Diamond Head Drive from Elbert Edward Elementary School and the
surrounding area is primarily residential with a mix of low, medium and high density. An
Individual Care Center providing child care is compatible with the surrounding uses and
the suitability of the site can be demonstrated by the fact that it was previously used for
an individual care center. The current proposal reduces the intensity of the use from 120
children to 84 children.

Staff has determined that the proposed Individual Care Center (Child care) is less
intensive than the previous iteration of a Child Care Center on the site (reducing from
120 children to 84 children), is compatible with the surrounding development in the
neighborhood, and with the variance for parking will be suitable for the site. Therefore,
staff recommends approval of this project with conditions.

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (VAR-68592)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

The subject site was developed with a Child Care Facility for 120 children in 1982, and
operated as such for 20 years. The site was built with a small parking area that can
only provide 10 parking spaces (including one van accessible handicapped parking
space), due to the building placement and the circular drive that allows ample space for
the pick-up and drop-off of children. The applicant is seeking to reestablish the same
use at a reduced capacity of 84 children, and the circular drive will continue to allow all
pick-up and drop-off to occur on the subject property. As such, the strict application of
the zoning regulation requiring 19 parking spaces would result in an undue hardship
upon the owner of the property. Staff therefore recommends approval of the Variance
(VAR-68592) to allow 10 parking spaces where 19 spaces are required for an Individual
Care Center at 555 Page Street.

FINDINGS (SUP-68591)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious


and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The site is located in a primarily residentially zoned and guided neighborhood, but
is adjacent to commercially zoned and guided properties thus providing an
appropriate transitional use that can also serve the surrounding residential
neighborhood.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The site is already developed with a building that has served as an Individual Care
Center (Child Care) that was approved for a greater number of children served.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The site is accessed from Page Street, a local street that is approximately 400
feet from Bonanza Road, a primary arterial according to the Planned Streets and
Highways Map. The surrounding street system is therefore adequate to serve the
needs of an Individual Care Center (Child Care).

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.

This use will return an existing building to use and provide child care in a
neighborhood primarily developed with a mix of low, medium and high density
residential which will allow a reduction in the vehicle trips and trip distance for
families in the area.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

Title 19.12 does not include specific conditions for an Individual Care Center
special use permit.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


A Variance (V-0091-79) to allow a Child Care Facility for 120 children
11/29/1979
was approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments.
An Extension of Time to Variance (V-0091-79) to allow a Child Care
4/24/1980 Facility for 120 children was approved by the Board of Zoning
Adjustments.

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


An Extension of Time to Variance (V-0091-79) to allow a Child Care
3/26/1981 Facility for 120 children was approved by the Board of Zoning
Adjustments.
An Extension of Time to Variance (V-0091-79) to allow a Child Care
Facility for 120 children was approved by the Board of Zoning
1/28/1982
Adjustments. A Revise Plot Plan was also approved by the Board of
Zoning Adjustments.
A Variance (V-0015-82) to allow a six foot block wall and six foot chain
2/25/1982 link fence in the front yard was approved by the Board of Zoning
Adjustments.
A Code Enforcement Case (#26898) for graffiti was opened, and
3/9/2005
closed on 3/21/2005
A Code Enforcement Case (#87839) for graffiti was opened, and
3/24/2010
closed 4/1/2010

Most Recent Change of Ownership


10/23/2003 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#unknown) was issued for the Little Wranglers Child
7/22/1982
Care Facility.
A building permit (#332501) for the reuse of the existing building was
12/21/2016 applied for, but has not been issued due to the requirement of a
Special Use Permit.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff held a pre-application conference with the applicant and
explained the process. Staff instructed the applicant to revise the site
1/16/2107
plan to properly provide ADA accessible parking in accordance with
Title 19.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor held

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
During a routine site visit performed by staff, staff observed a vacant
1/16/2017
child care center.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.69 acres

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject SC (Service R-E (Residence
Vacant
Property Commercial) Estates)
GC (General C-2 (General
North Auto Body Repair
Commercial) Commercial)
South Public School PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Parking SC (Service C-1 (Limited
East
Facility/Vacant Commercial) Commercial)
Medium Density M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
West
Residential Residential) Residential)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 19.06, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 30,056 SF Y
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 139 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front 50 Feet 77.9 Feet Y
Side 10 Feet 37.75 Feet Y
Corner 15 Feet 37.3 Feet Y
Rear 35 Feet 53.75 Feet Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 6 Feet NA NA
Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 50.6 % Y
Max. Building Height 35 Feet One Story Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Screened
Trash Enclosure N*
Roof or Trellis and Gated
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y
The trash enclosure is existing and was not required to be covered when constructed in
1982.

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Page Street Local Street Title 13 60 Y
Diamond Head
Local Street Title 13 60 Y
Drive

PB
VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 [PRJ-68572]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
1/10
Individual 84 children 9
children
Care Center
10 employees 1 per 10
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 19 10 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 18 1 9 1 N*
Loading
1 1 Y
Spaces
Percent Deviation 48%
* Variance (VAR-68592) was requested to allow 10 spaces where 19 are required, staff
recommends approval of the variance request. A condition of approval requires that a
revised site plan depicting a van accessible parking space conforming with Title 19 has
been included.

PB
VAR-68592



VAR-68592

VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 - REVISED



VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 - REVISED


VAR-68592 [PRJ-68572] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SUP-68591 - APPLICANT: DISCOVERY GARDENS CHILD
CARE - OWNER: DT MARK PROPERTIES, LLC
555 PAGE STREET
01/17/17
VAR-68592 [PRJ-68572] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SUP-68591 - APPLICANT: DISCOVERY GARDENS CHILD
CARE - OWNER: DT MARK PROPERTIES, LLC
555 PAGE STREET
01/17/17
7777b

777777777b7b777
77777777777777777
77777777777777
7777777

77777777777777
7777777777777
777777777777b7777
777777777777777

7777777777777777
7777777777777
7777777777777
77777

777777777777777
77777777777777
77777777777777777
7777777777

7777777777
777777

VAR-68592 and SUP-68591 - REVISED


Agenda Item No.: 38.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68591 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-68592 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: DISCOVERY GARDENS CHILD CARE - OWNER: DT MARK PROPERTIES,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR AN INDIVIDUAL CARE
CENTER use at 555 Page Street (APN 140-32-102-002), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 3
(Coffin) [PRJ-68572]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SUP-68591



SUP-68591


Agenda Item No.: 39.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68177 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: OAKTREE
CAPITAL SERIES 3, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A
ZERO-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN
EXISTING PATIO COVER on 0.17 acres at 420 South Maryland Parkway (APN 139-34-811-
038), R-4 (High Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68008]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
VAR-68177 [PRJ-68008]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: PPLICANT/OWNER: OAKTREE CAPITAL SERIES 3, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-68177 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 38

NOTICES MAILED 183

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

CS
VAR-68177 [PRJ-68008]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68177 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

3. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

4. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

5. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the


Maryland Parkway public right-of-way, if any, prior to the issuance of permits for
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of
the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured
entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property within the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right-of-way shall be the responsibility of the
applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to
the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the License
Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and
Safety (702-229-4836).

CS
VAR-68177 [PRJ-68008]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to keep an existing attached patio cover located in the required front
yard setback area located at 420 South Maryland Parkway.

ISSUES

The R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning district prohibits patio covers from being
placed in the front yard setback area. The applicant proposes to keep an existing
unpermitted patio cover with a zero-foot front yard setback. Staff recommends
denial.

ANALYSIS

The applicant requests a Variance in order to keep an existing patio cover with a zero-
foot front yard setback. The subject site is located within the R-4 (High Density
Residential) zoning district. Per Title 19.06.120, patio covers are not allowed in the front
yard setback in this zoning district. The applicant was cited by Code Enforcement
(Case #171831) for constructing the subject structure without a building permit. The
case remains open. During a field check, staff found that the patio cover slightly
protrudes into the right-of-way. This Variance request was submitted to various City
Departments for comment. Public Works confirmed that the subject patio cover is
slightly within the right-of-way and is requiring an encroachment agreement. A condition
of approval has been added to address this issue.

Since this is a self-imposed hardship created by the owner, staff recommends denial of
the request. If approved, the applicant will be able to keep their existing patio cover with
a zero-foot front yard setback.

FINDINGS (VAR-68177)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

CS
VAR-68177 [PRJ-68008]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by constructing a patio cover that does
not meet Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the
sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential
in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


Code Enforcement issued Case #171831 for a patio constructed
10/31/16
without a permit. The case remains open.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


04/28/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no relevant building permits or licenses on file.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant where the
12/01/16
submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed.

CS
VAR-68177 [PRJ-68008]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine site visit and found a patio cover constructed
01/05/17 in front of the subject building. The patio cover slightly protrudes into
the ROW. The site was free of debris.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.17

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject Multi-Family R-4 (High Density
MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Residential Residential)
Office, Other than P-R (Professional
North MXU (Mixed Use)
listed Office)
Multi-Family R-4 (High Density
South MXU (Mixed Use)
Residential Residential)
Commercial, Other C-1 (Limited
East MXU (Mixed Use)
than listed Commercial)
Multi-Family R-4 (High Density
West MXU (Mixed Use)
Residential Residential)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CS
VAR-68177 [PRJ-68008]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06.120, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 7,000 SF 7,405 SF Y
Min. Lot Width N/A N/A N/A
Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet 0 Feet N
Side 5 Feet 7 Feet Y
Corner N/A N/A N/A
Rear 5 Feet 127 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage N/A N/A N/A
Max. Building Height 55 Feet 9 Feet Y

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Maryland Planned Streets and
Primary Arterial 100 Y
Parkway Highways Map

CS
VAR-68177



VAR-68177

VAR-68177

VAR-68177

VAR-68177


VAR-68177

VAR-68177


VAR-68177

VAR-68177


VAR-68177
VAR-68177 [PRJ-68008] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: OAKTREE CAPITAL SERIES 3, LLC
420 SOUTH MARYLAND PARKWAY
01/05/17
VAR-68177 [PRJ-68008] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: OAKTREE CAPITAL SERIES 3, LLC
420 SOUTH MARYLAND PARKWAY
01/05/17

VAR-68177

VAR-68177
Agenda Item No.: 40.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68395 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PN II, INC - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ONE PARKING SPACE WHERE
FIVE IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR A TEMPORARY REAL ESTATE SALES
OFFICE USE on 0.41 acres at 8222 Agave Bloom Street (APN 125-09-712-038), R-PD2
(Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68383]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Protest Postcard
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PN II, INC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-68395 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to N/A
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 31

NOTICES MAILED 175

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 1

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68395 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

3. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

4. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow one parking space for a Temporary Real
Estate Sales Office use at 8222 Agave Bloom Street.

ISSUES

Pursuant to Title 19.12, the Temporary Real Estate Sales Office use shall have a
minimum of five parking spaces.

ANALYSIS

The subject property is located in the R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development 2


Units per Acre) zoning district. The property will be used as a Temporary Real Estate
Sales Office use for the single family residential development. According to Title
19.12, a minimum of five on-site parking spaces shall be provided, and the spaces
provided shall be in compliance with ADA parking requirements. The subject property
provides one parking space that is designated as a handicapped space.

The proposed parking configuration for the Temporary Real Estate Sales Office use is
not adequate pursuant to Title 19.08 standards. The four offsite parking spaces located
on Agave Bloom Street contain dimensions of nine feet by 18 feet; the parallel parking
standards are nine feet by 23 feet. Vehicles parked on Agave Street do not have
adequate room to maneuver, and would be forced to back out to the nearest
intersection.

The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow one parking space on a property where
a Temporary Real Estate Sales Office use is to be conducted. There are no unique
circumstances with this Variance request and staff recommends denial. If approved, it
is subject to conditions.

FINDINGS (VAR-68395)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by providing one on-site parking space
where the Temporary Real Estate Sales Office use requires an additional four on-site
parking spaces. The proposed parking configuration in the street does not allow
adequate room for vehicles to maneuver and turn around. In view of the absence of
any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Annex (ANX-
3103) property generally located on the southwest corner of Horse
01/21/04 Drive and Coke Street containing approximately 4.8 acres. The
Planning Commission recommended approval on 11/06/03. The
Annexation became effective on 01/30/04.
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-11001) 15.99
02/09/06 acres on the west side of Coke Street, north of Racel Street. The
annexation became effective 04/28/06.
The City Council approved a request to amend the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways (MSH-8232) to remove a portion of Horse Drive
10/05/05
between Coke Street and Conough Lane. The Planning Commission
recommended approval.

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Vacate (VAC-
8641) the south half of Horse Drive between Coke Street and
11/02/05 Conough Lane, and the east half of Conough Lane from Horse Drive
to approximately 375 feet north of Teasha Avenue. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for Rezoning (ZON-9926) from U
(Undeveloped) Zone [RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation)
General Plan Designation] to R-PD2 (Residential Planned
Development- 2 Units per Acre) on 5.93 acres on the northwest corner
of Horse Drive and Coke Street. The Planning Commission
01/04/06
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-9927) for an eight-lot single-family residential
subdivision on 5.93 acres on the northwest corner of Horse Drive and
Coke Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map
(TMP-10525) for an eight-lot residential subdivision on 5.93 acres
01/12/06
adjacent to the south side of Horse Drive, approximately 300 feet west
of Coke Street.
The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Annex (ANX-
11001) an area consisting of approximately 15.99 acres generally
04/19/06 located on the west side of Coke Street, north of Racel Street. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
Annexation became effective on 04/28/06.
The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Vacate (VAC-
13850) public right-of-way generally located west of the intersection of
04/18/07
Horse Drive and Coke Street. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for Rezoning (ZON-13854) from
U (Undeveloped) Zone [RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation)
Master Plan designation] under Resolution of Intent to R-PD2
(Residential Planned Development- 2 Units per Acre) to R-PD2
(Residential Planned Development- 2 Units per Acre) on 24.8 acres at
the southwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. The Planning
08/01/07 Commission recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a related request for a Variance (VAR-
13853) to allow zero square feet of open space where 35,293 square
feet are required for 49-lot Single Family Residential Development.
The City Council approved a related request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-13852) for a 49-lot Single Family Residential
Development.

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map
08/23/07 (TMP-23104) for a 49-lot Single Family Residential Development on
24.8 acres at the southwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street.
The Department of Planning administratively approved a request for
an Extension of Time (EOT-27692) of a previously approved Petition
05/21/08
to Vacate (VAC-13850) public right-of-way generally located west of
the intersection of Horse Drive and Coke Street.
The Department of Planning staff administratively approved a request
for an Extension of Time (EOT-34070) of a previously approved
05/22/09
Petition to Vacate (VAC-13850) public right-of-way generally located
west of the intersection of Horse Drive and Coke Street.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
35061) of a previously approved Variance (VAR-13853) to allow zero
square feet of open space where 35,293 square feet are required for a
49-lot Single Family Residential Development on 24.8 acres at the
08/19/09 southwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. Staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a related request for an Extension of Time
(EOT-35064) of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-13852) for a 49-lot Single Family Residential Development.
The Department of Planning staff administratively approved a second
request for an Extension of Time (EOT-37889) of an approved
05/21/10
Vacation (VAC-13850) for public rights-of-way generally located west
of the intersection of Horse Drive and Coke Street.
The Department of Planning staff administratively approved a third
Extension of Time (EOT-40913) of a previously approved Petition to
03/15/11
Vacate (VAC-13850) public right-of-way generally located west of the
intersection of Horse Drive and Coke Street.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
40914) of a previously approved Variance (VAR-13853) to allow zero
square feet of open space where 35,293 square feet are required for a
49-lot Single Family Residential Development on 24.8 acres at the
04/06/11 southwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. Staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a related request for an Extension of Time
(EOT-40912) of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-13852) for a 49-lot Single Family Residential Development.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map
(TMP-41623) for a 49-lot Single Family Residential Development on
07/12/11
24.8 acres at the southwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street.
Staff recommended approval.

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


A Code Enforcement case (108682) was process for trash and debris
12/15/11 on property located at the northwest corner of Racel Street and Coke
Street. The case was resolved on 04/02/12.
A Code Enforcement case (108782) was processed for trash and
12/20/11
debris at 8325 Coke Street. The case was resolved on 04/02/12.
The Department of Planning staff administratively approved a fourth
Extension of Time (EOT-48781) of an approved Vacation (VAC-13850)
04/23/13
for public rights-of-way generally located west of the intersection of
Horse Drive and Coke Street.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
50731) of an approved Variance (VAR-13853) to allow zero square
10/02/13 feet of open space where 35,293 square feet are required for a 49-lot
Single Family Residential Development on 24.8 acres at the southwest
corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
50733) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-13852)
10/02/13 for a 49-lot Single Family Residential Development on 24.8 acres at
the southwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. Staff
recommended denial.
The Department of Planning staff administratively approved a Minor
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-52465) to add eight floor plans,
increase the perimeter landscape buffers along the entrance area and
along the east perimeter, add architectural enhancements to the
01/15/14
building elevations, decrease the drainage and emergency access
easement from 30 feet to 25 feet wide and minor lot size adjustments
on lots 21 through 37 and lots 43 through 49 on 24.8 acres at the
southwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street.
The Department of Planning staff administratively approved a fifth
Extension of Time (EOT-53550) of an approved Vacation (VAC-13850)
04/17/14
for public rights-of-way generally located west of the intersection of
Horse Drive and Coke Street.
A Final Map (FMP-55886) was processed for a 49-lot Single Family
09/04/14 Residential Development on 23.88 acres on the west side of Coke
Street, approximately 215 feet north of Racel Street.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
55999) of an approved Variance (VAR-13853) to allow zero square
11/05/14 feet of open space where 35,293 square feet are required for a 49-lot
Single Family Residential Development on 24.8 acres at the southwest
corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. Staff recommended approval.

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


A Final Map (FMP-55886) for a 49-lot single family residential
06/19/15 subdivision on 23.88 acres on the west side of Coke Street,
approximately 215 feet north of Racel Street, was recorded.
The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-
60341) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-13852) to
09/08/15 add three model home floor plans with elevations and establish
development standards for Accessory Structures (Class II) on 24.80
acres on the west side of Coke Street, approximately 210 feet north of
Racel Street. Staff recommended approval.
The Department of Planning administratively approved a Minor
Amendment (SDR-6538) of an approved Site Development Plan
07/26/16 Review (SDR-13852) to add three model home floor plans with
elevations on 24.80 acres on the west side of Coke Street,
approximately 210 north of Racel Street.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


08/05/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#328066) was issued for a Single Family, Detached
10/20/16
at 8222 Agave Bloom Street. The permit is currently active.
A building permit (#328067) was issued for an Accessory Structure
10/20/16
(Class II) at 8222 Agave Bloom Street. The permit is currently active.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to discuss
the Variance application submittal process for a Temporary Real
12/28/16
Estate Sales Office use. The subject property can only provide one
parking space.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
A field check by staff of the subject property was conducted. The
01/05/17
subject property is currently vacant.

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.41

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation

RNP (Rural R-PD2 (Residential


Subject
Undeveloped Neighborhood Planned Development-
Property
Preservation) 2 Units per Acre)
RNP (Rural
R-PD2 (Residential
Neighborhood
North Undeveloped Planned Development-
Preservation) - Clark
2 Units per Acre)
County
Single Family, DR (Desert Rural R-E (Residence
South
Detached Density Residential) Estates)

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
RN (Rural R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family,
East Neighborhood) - Clark Residential) - Clark
Detached
County County
PR-OS R-PD2 (Residential
West Undeveloped (Parks/Recreation/Op Planned Development-
en Space) 2 Units per Acre)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

RG
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Coke Street Local Street Title 13 60 Feet N/A

Pursuant to Title 19.12, the following parking standards apply:


Parking Requirement
Gross Required Provided Compliance
Floor Area Parking Parking
Use Parking
or Number Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
of Units capped capped
Temporar
y Real
Estate
Sales
N/A N/A 5
Office
(Single
Family
Detached)
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 5 1 N
Regular and Handicapped N
4 1 0 1
Spaces Required

RG
VAR-68395



VAR-68395

VAR-68395

7
b7
7
7

7A77
7A77
A

7A77
77b

7
7
7
7A
b7A

77Ab
77Ab
77Ab



7 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7
7
7
7
77 A
7
7
bb
7A
A77b'7A7

777777777
7
7 7 A b A A7A A b7A A

VAR-68395
VAR-68395 [PRJ-68383] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: PN II, INC
8222 AGAVE BLOOM STREET
01/05/17
VAR-68395


Agenda Item No.: 41.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68398 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF
NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: SUMMIT GRAND CANYON, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 17-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 30 FEET
IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING on 0.24 acres at 4017
Turquoise Falls Street (APN 138-06-413-008), R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) Zone,
Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-68257]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER:
SUMMIT GRAND CANYON, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-68398 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 19

NOTICES MAILED 179

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

CS
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68398 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

3. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

4. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CS
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to construct a house within a required rear yard setback area. The
proposed house will be built within a 12-lot subdivision at 4017 Turquoise Falls Street.

ISSUES

The R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) zoning district requires principal


dwellings to have a rear yard setback of 30 feet. The applicant is requesting a
Variance to allow a 17-foot rear yard setback. Staff recommends denial of the
request.

ANALYSIS

The applicant is requesting a Variance in order to construct a new single family dwelling
with a rear yard setback of 17 feet. The subject site is located within the R-D (Single
Family Residential-Restricted) zoning district which requires principal buildings to have
a minimum rear yard setback of 30 feet. According to the site plan submitted by the
applicant, the proposed dwelling will have a 17-foot setback from the second floor
balcony and a 27-foot setback from the ground level. While patio covers are permitted
to encroach into the side and rear yard setback areas, balconies must meet the setback
of the main residence. The applicant meets all other requirements of Title 19. In
November of 2016, staff approved three Administrative Deviations for minor setback
requests within the subject 12-lot subdivision. Each setback request represented a ten
percent decrease of the minimum required setback.

Since this is a self-imposed hardship created by the owner, staff recommends denial of
the request. If approved, the applicant will be able to construct their home with a 17-
foot rear yard setback.

FINDINGS (VAR-68398)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

CS
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to construct a house that
does not meet Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed
by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is
preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for
granting of Variances.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for an Annexation [A-0006-99(A)]
application, which petitioned to annex property generally located at the
11/21/01 northwest corner of Alexander Road and Grand Canyon Drive. The
Planning Commission recommended approval. The annexation
became effective on 11/30/01.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-5796) from
U(Undeveloped) [DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) General Plan
designation] to R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 units per
03/02/05
acre) on 5.0 acres adjacent to the northwest corner of Grand Canyon
Drive and Alexander Road. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-5797) for a proposed nine lot single-family residential
03/02/05 development on 5.0 acres adjacent to the northwest corner of Grand
Canyon Drive and Alexander Road. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval of the request.

CS
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-59527) from DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) to R (Rural
09/16/15
Density Residential) at 9704 West Alexander Road. The Planning
Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-59529)
from R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units Per Acre) to
09/16/15 R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) at 9704 West Alexander
Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of
the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-59532)
for a 12-lot Single-Family Residential Subdivision on 5.00 acres at
09/16/15
9704 West Alexander Road. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval of the request.
Staff approved an Administrative Deviation (DVN-67390) request to
11/16/16 allow a front yard setback of 22.68 feet where 25 feet is required on
0.24 acres at 4065 Turquoise Falls Street.
Staff approved an Administrative Deviation (DVN-67391) request to
11/16/16 allow a rear yard setback of 22.48 feet where 30 feet is required on
0.24 acres at 4017 Turquoise Falls Street.
Staff approved an Administrative Deviation (DVN-67392) request to
11/16/16 allow a front yard setback of 27 feet where 30 feet is required on 0.24
acres at 4001 Turquoise Falls Street.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


10/29/15 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no related building permits or business licenses on file.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
12/21/16
submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

CS
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
Staff conducted a field check and found the subject area to be under
01/05/17
construction.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.24

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject R (Rural Density R-D (Single Family
Undeveloped
Property Residential) Residential-Restricted)
R (Rural Density R-D (Single Family
North Undeveloped
Residential) Residential-Restricted)
R (Rural Density R-D (Single Family
South Undeveloped
Residential) Residential-Restricted)
R (Rural Density R-D (Single Family
East Undeveloped
Residential) Residential-Restricted)
West Clark County Clark County Clark County

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CS
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 10,000 SF 10,280 SF Y
Min. Lot Width 80 Feet 98 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front 25 Feet 25 Feet Y
Side 5 Feet 5 Feet Y
Rear 30 Feet 17 Feet N
Max. Building Height 35 Feet 21 Feet Y

CS
VAR-68398



VAR-68398

VAR-68398




A
A




A

b



7

7

A

b
7 7
A


7 7


7 

7 7


A7

7
7
7


7 7
7
7

7
7

7 7

VAR-68398


7



A
A




A

b



7

7

A

b
7 7
A


7


7 

7 7


A7


7

7 7

7




7

7
7
7

7 7 7
7
7
7 


7 7

7 7

VAR-68398
A
A


A

A b



A




VAR-68398
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: SUMMIT
GRAND CANYON, LLC
4017 TURQUOISE FALLS STREET
01/05/17
VAR-68398 [PRJ-68257] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: SUMMIT HOMES OF NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: SUMMIT
GRAND CANYON, LLC
4017 TURQUOISE FALLS STREET
01/05/17
A7
777
A7A77
7
A7

77
A

b7777
777
777

777 7b77A7777777
A7777
7
7777b

777777777b77
77777277777777
b77A77777797

7777727777777A7777
7777777777277277727
77727777777777777
77777777

277777777777777777
777

A7

7
7

VAR-68398
Agenda Item No.: 42.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAR-68625 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LA CABANA
RESTAURANT - OWNER: NORTH AMERICAN 888 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LTD
- For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A PROPOSED FREESTANDING
SIGN IN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING CONSOLIDATED SIGN WHERE SUCH IS NOT
ALLOWED AND TO ALLOW THE FREESTANDING SIGN TO BE 60 FEET FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED SIGN WHERE 100 FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED at 2800 West
Sahara Avenue (APN''s Multiple), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-
68283]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Protest Postcard
VAR-68625 [PRJ-68283]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: PPLICANT: LA CABANA RESTAURANT - OWNER: NORTH
AMERICAN 888 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LTD

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-68625 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 28

NOTICES MAILED 336

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 1

FS
VAR-68625 [PRJ-68283]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-68625 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

3. All residential protection standards of Title 19.08 shall be adhered to.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

FS
VAR-68625 [PRJ-68283]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for a Variance to allow a freestanding sign on the same street frontage
as an existing consolidated sign where one is not permitted, and to allow a 70-foot sign
separation between two freestanding signs where 100 feet is the minimum required at
2800 West Sahara Avenue.

ISSUES

When a consolidated sign is located on a site, additional freestanding signs are


not permitted on the same street frontage.
A Variance has been requested to allow a 20-foot tall freestanding sign on the
same street frontage as a consolidated sign where one is not permitted, and to
allow the proposed sign 70 feet from an existing freestanding (consolidated) sign
where 100 feet is the minimum separation required. Staff recommends denial of
the request.

ANALYSIS

The existing commercial development houses a number of businesses adjacent to


approximately 500 feet of street frontage along Sahara Avenue. The applicant is
proposing a new 20-foot tall freestanding sign in addition to an existing consolidated
sign on the same street frontage where one is not allowed.

A consolidated sign is defined by Title 19 as an oversized freestanding sign which


advertises one or more tenants within a commercial development. If the development
elects to consolidate the permitted freestanding signs, parcels containing individual
freestanding buildings within the development or commercial subdivision shall be limited
to one monument sign per street frontage in addition to the consolidated sign.
Freestanding signs other than monument signs not permitted on the same street
frontage as a consolidated sign.

In addition to proposing a freestanding sign where one is not permitted, the location of
the sign is also within the required sign separation between two freestanding signs. The
applicant has proposed a freestanding sign 70 feet from the existing consolidated sign
where 100 feet is the minimum allowed.

FS
VAR-68625 [PRJ-68283]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

While the sign elevation does not depict any electronic messaging units, animated or
flashing signs, it should be noted that the sign is located within 200 feet of R-3 (Medium
Density Residential) zoned parcels, and as such, these types of units are not allowed.

Title 19 allows for greater height and area dimensions for a consolidated sign with the
intent of allowing multiple businesses to advertise on one sign rather than having
multiple signs that contribute to a cluttered and unsightly concentration of signs at any
given location. The existing consolidated sign is 70 feet from the location of the
proposed freestanding sign, which if approved, will exacerbate sign clutter along this
portion of Sahara Avenue. No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has
been presented, in that the applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing
a freestanding sign where one is not permitted. As numerous on-site commercial
tenants are currently doing, adding signage to the existing consolidated sigh would
allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements while still providing advertising exposure
for the business. Staff recommends denial of the request.

FINDINGS (VAR-68283)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a freestanding sign where
one is not permitted. Adding signage for the business to the existing consolidated sign

FS
VAR-68625 [PRJ-68283]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Most Recent Change of Ownership


08/01/12 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held and general submittal
12/08/17
requirements were discussed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required nor was one held.

Field Check
A field check was conducted and an existing business park is located
12/28/16
on the subject site.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 4.26

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Office, Other than C-1 (Limited
Subject
Listed; Retail; MXU (Mixed Use) Commercial)
Property
Restaurant
C-1 (Limited
Office, Other than
North MXU (Mixed Use) Commercial)
Listed

FS
VAR-68625 [PRJ-68283]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
R-3 (Medium Density
Multi-Family Residential);
MXU (Mixed Use);
South Residential; C-1 (Limited
C (Commercial)
Restaurant Commercial)

C-1 (Limited
Financial
East MXU (Mixed Use) Commercial)
Institution, General
C-1 (Limited
Office, Other than
West MXU (Mixed Use) Commercial)
Listed; Restaurant

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial Highways Map 150 Y

FS
VAR-68625 [PRJ-68283]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Consolidated Signs: [19.08.120]


Standards Allowed Provided
1 / Street frontage. Other
signage is limited to one
monument sign per street 1 / Street frontage
Maximum Number
frontage in addition to the 1 total
consolidated sign

2 square feet per lineal foot of


Maximum Area 324
street frontage (1,500 sf)
Maximum Height 50 Feet 35 Feet
Minimum Setback 5 Feet 5 Feet
Internal, external, animated
Illumination Internal
and electric sign message

Freestanding Signs: [19.08.120]


Standards Allowed Provided
None when a consolidated
sign is located on the same
Maximum Number 1 total
street frontage

2 square feet per lineal foot of


street frontage (400 sf due to
Maximum Area 124 SF
proximity to residential zoned
parcels)
Maximum Height 40 Feet 20
100 feet from other
Additional Standards 70 Feet
freestanding signs
Minimum Setback 5 Feet 5 Feet
Illumination Direct/Internal Internal

FS
VAR-68625



VAR-68625

VAR-68625 - REVISED

VAR-68625 - REVISED
VAR-68625 [PRJ-68283] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: LA CABANA RESTAURANT - OWNER: NORTH AMERICAN
888 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LTD
2800 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17

VAR-68625
Agenda Item No.: 43.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68386 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: IMAGINE
ADVENTURES LAS VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: FAEC HOLDINGS WIRRULLA, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED TAVERN-LIMITED
ESTABLISHMENT USE at 450 Fremont Street, Suite #250 (APN 139-34-513-002), C-2
(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68284]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
2. Special Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
4. Supporting Documentation - SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
5. Photo(s) - SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
6. Justification Letter - SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
7. Protest Postcards - SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: PPLICANT: IMAGINE ADVENTURES LAS VEGAS, LLC -
OWNER: FAEC HOLDINGS WIRRULLA, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-68386 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SUP-68387 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-68386

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 30

NOTICES MAILED 608

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 2

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-68386 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Tavern-
Limited Establishment use.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor
license.

6. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SUP-68387 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Night
Club use.

2. Conformance and approval of all conditions for Special Use Permit (SUP-68387).

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 1,214-foot distance


separation from religious facility.

5. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 1,340-foot distance


separation from a school.

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

7. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for two Special Use Permits for a Tavern-Limited Establishment and a
Night Club. These uses will be located at 450 Fremont Street, Suite #250.

ISSUES

The Tavern-Limited Establishment use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial)


zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Staff recommends
approval of the application.
The Night Club use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district with
the approval of a Special Use Permit. Staff recommends approval of the application.
Distance separation waivers are being requested to allow the proposed Night Club
use within 1,500 feet of a church and a school. Staff recommends approval of the
waiver requests.

ANALYSIS

The proposal is for a 19,665 square-foot Tavern Limited Establishment and Night Club
at 450 Fremont Street, Suite #250. The previous business at this location was a Liquor
Establishment (Tavern). The subject site is located within the Downtown Casino Core
District of the Downtown Centennial Plan, the Las Vegas Redevelopment Area, the
Live-Work Overlay District, and the Airport Overlay District.

Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject
to the automatic application of parking requirements. The proposed use normally
requires 1,057 parking spaces, while this facility provides 680 spaces in the two level
basement parking garage. In addition, the site is located on a major mass transit route
and there are other parking garages in the immediate vicinity.

There are two distance separation waivers being requested with the proposed Nightclub
use. Title 19.12 requires a Nightclub to be at least 1,500 feet from a church,
synagogue, school, child care facility licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.
The waivers being requested are to allow 1,214 feet from a church and 1,340 feet from
a school where 1,500 feet is required. Title 19.12 allows waivers of the distance

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

separation requirements for locations within the Downtown Casino Overlay Districts.
Both waiver requests are recommended for approval as there are no detrimental effects
on the protected uses, and the sites location within the Downtown Casino Overlay
makes a nightclub appropriate for the area.

A Tavern-Limited Establishment and a Night Club are both uses permitted in the C-2
(General Commercial) zoning district with the approval of Special Use Permit
applications. Additionally, the following analyses are required:

The Tavern-Limited Establishment use is defined as An establishment that is license


with a tavern-limited license in accordance with LVMC Chapter 6.50. The proposed
use meets the definition as stated in the justification letter date stamped 01/10/17; the
establishment will be licensed and operate as a Tavern-Limited.

There are no Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use.

The Night Club use is defined as:

A. An establishment, other than a teen dance center, where its primary operations are
that of preparing and serving alcoholic beverages for immediate on-premises
consumption and the provision of live entertainment, generally operated primarily in the
late evening/early morning hours. An establishment shall be considered a nightclub if it
exhibits the following characteristics;

1. Live entertainment is provided in an area that exceeds fifty square feet, and the
following spaces shall be included in the calculation of such area: stage space,
disc jockey space, dance floor(s), and any space primarily dedicated to the
viewing of the live entertainment provided by the licensee; and

2. Its primary operating hours are generally between the hours of nine p.m. and five
a.m. the following day, or afterhours between four a.m. and 10 a.m. on the
same day.

B. For purposes of this description, live entertainment includes live music (with or
without dancing), recorded or digital music played for patrons by a live disc jockey or
electronic device, or karaoke entertainment or other stage shows, such as a magician,
comedian other similar type of performance artist.

The proposed use meets the definition as stated in the justification letter date stamped
01/10/17; the Night Club use will have a disc jockey and will be providing live
entertainment at least three times per week.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

*1. Because the primary operations of a nightclub are that of preparing and serving
alcoholic beverages for immediate on-premises consumption and the provision of
live entertainment, the City Council declares that the public, health, safety and
general welfare of the City are best promoted and protected by generally
requiring a minimum separation between a nightclub and other uses that should
be protected from the impacts associated with a nightclub. Therefore, except as
otherwise provided below, no nightclub may be located within 1500 feet of a
church, synagogue, school, child care facility licensed for more than 12 children
or City park.

The subject site is located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District, and
waivers have been requested to allow the proposed nightclub within 1,500 feet of
an existing church and school in accordance with LVMC 19.12.050(C). Staff
recommends approval of the waiver requests.

*2. A person that desires to operate a nightclub shall obtain both a nightclub land
use entitlement as well as any necessary land use entitlement for the service of
alcohol for on-premises consumption. A person lawfully operating a nightclub as
defined by this section and LVMC 6.39, prior to December 1, 2014, is not
required to obtain a special use permit for the continued operation of such
nightclub use. Real property entitled for a nightclub pursuant to this Code shall
have no specific spacing requirements between other nightclubs. However, as
the nightclub entitlement is a separate and distinct from any land use entitlement
permitting the service of alcohol for on-premises consumption, this provision shall
not act to waive or otherwise diminish the specific spacing requirements between
uses entitled for the service of alcohol for on-premises consumption.

The proposed Night Club use will be in conjunction with the Tavern-Limited
Establishment use under Special Use Permit (SUP-68386).

*3. The distance separation referred to in Requirement 1, above, and Requirement


8, below, shall be measured with reference to the shortest distance between two
property lines, one being the property line of the proposed nightclub which is
closest to the existing use which the measurement pertains, and the other being
the property line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed nightclub.
The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening
obstacles.

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The subject site is located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District, and
waivers have been requested to allow the proposed nightclub within 1,500 feet of
an existing church and school in accordance with LVMC 19.12.050(C). Staff
recommends approval of the waiver requests.

*4. For the purpose of Requirement 2, and for that purpose only;

a. The property line of a protected use refers to the property line of a fee
interest parcel that has been created by an approved and recorded parcel
map or subdivision map, and does not include the property line of a
leasehold parcel; and

b. The property line of a nightclub refers to;

i. The property line of a parcel that has been created by an approved


and recorded parcel map or commercial subdivision map; or
ii. The property line of a parcel that is located within an approved and
recorded commercial subdivision and that has been created by a
record of survey or legal description, if;

A. Using the property line of that parcel for the purpose


of measuring the distance separation referred to in
Requirement 1 would qualify the parcel under the
distance separation requirement;
B. The proposed nightclub will have direct access (both
ingress and egress) from a street having a minimum
right-of-way width of 100 feet. The required access
may be shared with a larger development but must
be located within the property lines of the parcel on
which the proposed nightclub will be located;
C. All parking spaces required by this Section 19.12.070
for the nightclub will be located on the same parcel
as the use; and
D. The owners of all parcels within the commercial
subdivision, including the owner of agreement,
satisfactory to the City Attorney, that provides for
perpetual, reciprocal cross-access, ingress and
egress throughout the commercial subdivision.

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The subject site is located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District, and
waivers have been requested to allow the proposed nightclub within 1,500 feet of
an existing church and school in accordance with LVMC 19.12.050(C). Staff
recommends approval of the waiver requests.

5. The distance separation requirement set forth in Requirement 1 does not apply to
an establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a
hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992, or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992.

Not applicable; the proposed establishments location does not contain any hotel
with non-restricted gaming license.

6. The distance separation requirement set forth in Requirement 1 may be waived


in accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) under the following
circumstances:

a. in connection with a proposed nightclub that will be located on a parcel


within the C-V District, the Parkway Center District within the Downtown
Centennial Plan, the Gaming Enterprise Overlay District, the Fremont East
Entertainment District, the 18b Arts District or the Downtown Casino
Overlay District; or

b. in connection with a proposed nightclub that will be located within an


establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license and is not
exempted pursuant to paragraph 5;

The subject site is located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District, and
waivers have been requested to allow the proposed nightclub within 1,500 feet of
an existing church and school in accordance with LVMC 19.12.050(C). Staff
recommends approval of the waiver requests.

7. The use shall conform to, and is subject to, the provisions of LVMC Chapter 6.50;

The proposed use will be subject to all business licensing requirements outlined
in LVMC 6.50, if approved.

*8. No nightclub may be located within 500 feet of any single-family dwelling.

There are no single family dwellings within 500 feet of the proposed Night Club.

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

*9. Alcohol service is only permitted in conjunction with the following Title 6 alcoholic
beverage licenses: Beer and Wine Room, Tavern, Tavern-Limited and Urban
Lounge.

The proposed Night Club use will meet this requirement, as the use will be in
conjunction with Tavern-Limited Establishment use under SUP-68386, if
approved.

The subject site is located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District, where the
location of entertainment and music venues is encouraged. The proposed Tavern-
Limited Establishment and Night Club uses can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with the existing land uses; therefore, staff recommends
approval with conditions.

FINDINGS (SUP-68386)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious


and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The subject site is located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District of the,
where the location of entertainment and music venues is encouraged. The
proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment use is harmonious and compatible with
existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land uses as
projected by the General Plan

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed Tavern-Limited


Establishment use. There are onsite parking facilities and numerous parking
garages, surface parking lots, and on-street parking spaces in the immediate
vicinity of the venue. The sites location along Fremont Street provides excellent
pedestrian access, and several mass transit options to further alleviate traffic and
parking concerns.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Vehicular traffic will utilize the on-site parking garage, which is accessed from 4th
Street, and will be adequate for traffic generated by the proposed Tavern-Limited
Establishment use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.

A Tavern-Limited Establishment use will be subject to regular City and County


inspections for licensing; therefore, public health, safety, and welfare will not be
compromised.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Tavern-Limited use meets all applicable conditions of Title 19.12.

FINDINGS (SUP-68387)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious


and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The subject site is located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District, where the
location of entertainment and music venues is encouraged. The proposed Night
Club use is harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and
with future surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed Night Club use. There are
onsite parking facilities and numerous parking garages, surface parking lots, and
on-street parking spaces in the immediate vicinity of the venue. The sites
location along Fremont Street provides excellent pedestrian access, and several
mass transit options to further alleviate traffic and parking concerns.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Vehicular traffic will utilize the on-site parking garage, which is accessed from 4th
Street, and will be adequate for traffic generated by the proposed Night Club use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.

A Night Club use will be subject to regular City and County inspections for
licensing; therefore, public health, safety, and welfare will not be compromised.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

With approval of the requested waivers, the use will meet all applicable conditions
per Title 19.12 for the Nightclub use.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0100-64) from R-1 (Single
Family Residential), R-4 (High Density Residential), C-1 (Limited
Commercial), C-2 (General Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2
(General Commercial) for approximately 230 Acres generally located
12/16/64
on property bounded by Main Street to the west, Bonanza Road on the
north, Las Vegas Boulevard on the east, and Charleston Boulevard on
the south. The Planning Commission approved Reclassification of this
property.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan (SD-0003-98) on
property bounded by Fremont Street, 4th Street, Ogden Avenue, and
03/23/98 Las Vegas Boulevard South for a proposed 264,210 square-foot
Retail/Entertainment Complex. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Master Sign Plan (MSP-0014-01) for a
01/16/02 Retail/Entertainment Complex at 450 Fremont Street. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-43357) for a
Liquor Establishment (Tavern) at 450 Fremont Street, Suite #130 and
#250 with Waivers of the minimum 1,500-foot distance separation
12/07/11
requirement from a Liquor Establishment (Tavern), a religious facility
and a school. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Most Recent Change of Ownership


04/01/13 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#01000109) was issued for a retail mall/cinema at
01/03/01
450 Fremont Street. The permit was finalized on 03/19/02.
A business license (L16-91302) was issued for a tavern at 450
01/10/13 Fremont Street, Suite #250. The license was marked out of business
on 01/10/14.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the
requirements for a Special Use Permit (SUP) for a Tavern-Limited
Establishment use at 450 Fremont Street, Suite #250. A Night Club
12/21/16
use was also discussed, since the Tavern use will also include live
entertainment with disc jockey on site; therefore, a second application
for SUP application for a Night Club use.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a field check and found a vacant suite. The subject
01/05/17
site was clean and well maintained.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 2.75

Existing Land Planned or


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Special Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
C-2 (General
Subject Property Shopping Center C (Commercial)
Commercial)
C-2 (General
North Hotel C (Commercial)
Commercial)

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Ten
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Special Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Parking/Restaura C-2 (General
South C (Commercial)
nt/Taverns Commercial)
C-2 (General
East Parking, Retail C (Commercial)
Commercial)
C-2 (General
West Retail C (Commercial)
Commercial)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District Y
A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y
Downtown Casino Overlay District Y
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Las Vegas Boulevard Scenic Byway Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Parking Requirement - Downtown


Gross Floor Base Parking Requirement Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Regul Handi- Regul Handi-
Ratio
Units ar capped ar capped
Shopping
264,210 SF 1:250 SF 1,057
Center
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 1,057 680 Y

RG
SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 [PRJ-68284]
Staff Report Page Eleven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
1,214-foot distance
1,500 feet from a separation from a
Approval
Church/House of Worship. Church/House of
Worship.
1,340-foot distance
1,500 feet from a school. separation from a Approval
school.

RG
SUP-68386



SUP-68386

SUP-68386 and SUP-68387



SUP-68386 and SUP-68387


SUP-68386 [PRJ-68284] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68387 - APPLICANT: IMAGINE ADVENTURES
LAS VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: FAEC HOLDINGS WIRRULLA, LLC
450 FREMONT STREET, SUITE #250
01/05/17
SUP-68386 [PRJ-68284] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68387 - APPLICANT: IMAGINE ADVENTURES
LAS VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: FAEC HOLDINGS WIRRULLA, LLC
450 FREMONT STREET, SUITE #250
01/05/17
777
7b7b777
777

7
7 7 7

77

A7A

7
b777
777
777

7 777A777b777777
A7

7777b

7777777A777b777/77
7777777377777777
77777/77777777
7777777777777
77777777777777
777777777777/77A77
7/77777777777

377777777777
777/7777777777b7
7777777777777777
7777777377777777
b7/777777777777777
777777777777
77777777A7777/777
77777777b7/77777
77b7777777777
77

SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 - REVISED


7A777b
77
7

A7777777377777777
7777777777777
777777
/7777

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7

SUP-68386 and SUP-68387 - REVISED


Agenda Item No.: 44.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68387 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-68386 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: IMAGINE ADVENTURES LAS VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: FAEC HOLDINGS
WIRRULLA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A NIGHT
CLUB USE WITH WAIVERS OF REQUIRED DISTANCE SEPARATION TO ALLOW 1,214
FEET FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND 1,340 FEET FROM A SCHOOL
WHERE 1,500 FEET IS REQUIRED at 450 Fremont Street, Suite #250 (APN 139-34-513-002),
C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68284]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Special Map
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
SUP-68387



SUP-68387


Agenda Item No.: 45.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68233 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE
HERBST, INC. - OWNER: REMINGTON COMMERCIAL VIII, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 4,621 SQUARE-FOOT
BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at 7560 Oso Blanca Road (APN
125-17-314-001), T-C (Town Center) Zone [GC-TC (General Commercial-Town Center)
Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-67994]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER:
REMINGTON COMMERCIAL VIII, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-68233 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 56

NOTICES MAILED 836

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-68233 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a


Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor
license.

6. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a Special Use Permit request for off-premise sales of beer, wine and coolers at
an existing Convenience Store. The subject site is located within the Town Center
Master Plan area at 7560 Oso Blanca Road.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required for a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use


in the T-C (Town Center) zone with the GC-TC (General Commercial Town Center)
Special Land Use Designation. Staff recommends approval of the request.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located within the Town Center Master Plan area. The Town Center
Development Standards Manual does not provide a definition of the Beer/Wine/Cooler
Off-Sale Establishment use. It stipulates that the use shall comply with all minimum
conditions, standards and requirements applicable to the use Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-
Sale Establishment, as permitted by means of a Special Use Permit under LVMC
Chapter 19.12. Per Title 19, the Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is
defined as, An establishment whose license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the
sale of beer, wine and coolers to consumers only and not for resale, in original sealed or
corked containers, for consumption off the premises where business is conducted, and
is operated in connection with a grocery store, drugstore, convenience store, restaurant
or general retail store. The proposed use meets this definition, as the applicant intends
to sell beer, wine and coolers for off-sale consumption within an existing convenience
store at the subject site.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:

*1. Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment


(hereinafter establishment) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house of
worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposed use meets this requirement; there are no protected uses within 400 feet
of the proposed use.

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

*2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to in


Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two
property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is
closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the
property line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The
distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For
purposes of measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee interest
parcels and does not include the property line of:

a. Any leasehold parcel; or


b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation
described in Requirement 1.

This requirement is met, as the distance separation requirements were measured as


described.

*3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80


acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in
a straight line:

a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of
the structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to
intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property
line of the existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or
occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located, without regard
to intervening obstacles.

This requirement does not apply to the proposed use, as the parcel on which it is
proposed is less than 80 acres in size.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also
requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission
shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation
to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the
reasons in support of the decision.

This requirement does not apply to the proposed use, as no distance separation Waiver
is necessary.

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to: a. An


establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or b. A proposed
establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor space.

Neither of the above conditions apply to the proposed use.

*6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of
LVMC Chapter 6.50.

A condition of approval has been added to ensure this requirement is met.

7. The minimum distance requirements set forth in Requirement 1, which are otherwise
nonwaivable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:

a. In accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) for any


establishment which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Town Center
Development Standards Manual for any establishment which is proposed to
be located within the T-C (Town Center) Zoning District and which is
designated MS- TC (Main Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center Land Use
Plan;
c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000
square feet and 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, if no more than 10
percent of the retail floor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages; or
d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square
feet of retail floor space, if the area to be used for the sale, display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are
separated by a highway or a right of way with a width of at least 100 feet.

This requirement is met, as no waivers are requested for the proposed use.

8. No beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment shall be permitted on or adjacent to the


Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.

This requirement is met, as the subject site is not located on or adjacent to the
Pedestrian Mall.

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The proposed use will be located within an existing Convenience Store. The submitted
floor plan illustrates that approximately 109 square feet of retail area will be dedicated
for the sale and display of alcoholic beverages. The subject site is adjacent to a Multi-
Family residential development to the west and a Mini-Storage use to the north. In
September of 2016, the Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
65974) for a proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) within the same shopping center
as the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use. The addition of another
liquor establishment should not adversely affect the characteristics or safety of the
existing and future land uses. No additional parking is required for this use, as it is
ancillary to the primary use of a Convenience Store with fuel pumps. All of the minimum
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use requirements detailed in Title 19.12 and the Town
Center Development Standards are met and there are no special development
requirements pertaining to this site. There are no protected uses located within 400 feet
of the subject property. For these reasons, the proposed use is compatible with the
surrounding uses, and staff recommends approval of this applicant with conditions.

FINDINGS (SUP-68233)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious


and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and


compatible with existing surrounding land uses. The subject parcel is
predominantly surrounded by right-of-way and a Multi-Family development to the
west.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-sale
use as it will be ancillary to the existing Convenience Store.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The subject site has adequate access from Oso Blanca Road, a 90-foot right-of-
way.

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment will be subject to regular


inspections by Business Licensing and will not compromise the public health,
safety and welfare, or the overall objectives of the General Plan.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed use meets all the minimum Special Use Permit requirements
detailed in Title 19.12 and the Town Center Development Standards Manual.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) of 1,468 acres to
the T-C (Town Center) zoning district. The subject site was included in
12/07/98
this Rezoning request. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
04/14/15 58125) for a Restaurant with a Drive Through. Staff had
recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
04/14/15 58126) for a Restaurant with a Drive Through. Staff had
recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
58127) for a Convenience Store with Fuel Pumps and a waiver to
04/14/15
allow a 250-foot distance separation from a single family dwelling were
330 feet is required. Staff had recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-58128) for a 37,220 square-foot shopping center with a waiver
04/14/15
to allow a reduction of perimeter landscaping along the east property
line. Staff had recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-59501) for
07/14/15
a one-lot commercial subdivision. Staff had recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
63961) for a proposed Auto Parts (Accessory Installation) use with a
05/10/16 waiver to allow service bay doors to face a public right-of-way at the
northwest corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango Drive. Staff
recommended approval

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Staff Report Page Sevem
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-63961) for a proposed 5,220 square-foot Auto Parts (Accessory
05/10/16
Installation) building on 6.49 acres at the northwest corner of Oso
Blanca Road and Durango Drive. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-65976) for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site
09/13/16 Development Plan Review (SDR-58128) for a proposed 5,336 square-
foot liquor establishment (tavern) on 6.51 acres at the northwest
corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango Drive.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
09/13/16 65974) for a proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) at the northwest
corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango Drive.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


10/01/14 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (#P64-00284) was listed as pending for a
11/23/16 Beer/Wine/Cooler off sale use.
11/23/16 A business license (#G64-08461) was listed as pending for a Tobacco
Sales use.
11/23/16 A business license (#G64-08462) was listed as pending for a Car Wash
use.
11/23/16 A business license (#G64-08463) was listed as pending for a
Convenience Store use.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
11/30/16
submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found a commercial
01/05/17
development currently under construction.

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 6.49

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
GC-TC [(General
Subject Commercial Town
Undeveloped T-C (Town Center)
Property Center) Special Land
Use Designation]
GC-TC [(General
Mini Storage
Commercial Town
North Facility/Truck T-C (Town Center)
Center) Special Land
Rental
Use Designation]
PF-TC [(Public
Facilities Town
South Undeveloped T-C (Town Center)
Center) Special Land
Use Designation]
SC-TC [(Service
Commercial Town
East Undeveloped T-C (Town Center)
Center) Special Land
Use Designation]
SX-TC [(Suburban
Multi Family, Mixed Use Town
West T-C (Town Center)
Attached Center) Special Land
Use Designation]

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Town Center Master Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
T-C (Town Center) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CS
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Town Center
Town Center Development
Oso Blanca Road 90 Y
Frontage Road Standards Manual

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Shopping
37,220 SF 1/250 SF 149
Center
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 149 304 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Y
144 5 291 13
Required
Loading Spaces 5 5 Y

CS
SUP-68233



SUP-68233


Abb

77777
7777
7
A

7 bA

77

AA
A7
77

77

7 b
7



A7
7AbA
A

A7bb
b7A777AbA
A7A77

b
A7A7AA

7 7 b7A7A

b7 A
7b7

7 A
A

SUP-68233

SUP-68233

SUP-68233
Abb

77777
7777
7
A

bA



A7
7AbA

A7bb
b7A777AbA
A7A77

b
A7A7AA

b7
A
7b7

7 A
A

SUP-68233
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: REMINGTON
COMMERCIAL VIII, LLC
7560 OSO BLANCA ROAD
01/05/17
SUP-68233 [PRJ-67994] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: REMINGTON
COMMERCIAL VIII, LLC
7560 OSO BLANCA ROAD
01/05/17


SUP-68233

SUP-68233
Agenda Item No.: 46.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SUP-68421 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: GALENA
EUROPEAN SPA - OWNER: SSB PROPCO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,208 SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE
ESTABLISHMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A PARCEL ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 400 FEET IS
REQUIRED at 8053 North Durango Drive, Suite #110 (APN 125-08-817-002), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68095]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: GALENA EUROPEAN SPA - OWNER: SSB
PROPCO, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-68421 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 35

NOTICES MAILED 534

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-68421 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Massage
Establishment use.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot distance


separation from a parcel zoned for residential use where 400 feet is required.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed Massage Establishment at
8053 North Durango Drive, Suite 110.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required for a Massage Establishment in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district. Staff recommends approval.
A Waiver is required to allow a zero-foot distance separation between the proposed
Massage Establishment and a parcel zoned for residential use where 400 feet is the
minimum distance required. Staff recommends approval.

ANALYSIS

This is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow a Massage Establishment within a
spa like setting that will offer such services as manicures and pedicures, facials, and if
approved, massages. The subject site is a small commercial center adjacent to
Durango Drive specifically designed to provide area residents with goods and services.
The subject site is zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial).

The C-1 District is intended to provide most retail shopping and personal services, and
may be appropriate for mixed use developments. This district should be located on the
periphery of residential neighborhoods and should be confined to the intersections of
primary and secondary thoroughfares along major retail corridors. The C-1 District is
consistent with the Service Commercial and the Neighborhood Center categories of the
General Plan.

A Massage Establishment requires an approved Special Use Permit in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district. Although the proposed establishment is not strictly offering
Massage as their only service, the proposed use did not meet the requirements as an
Accessory Use as it exceeded the allowable maximum square footage of 150 square
feet by proposing to have two rooms dedicated to massage totaling 248 square feet.
The remaining 960 square feet of floor area will be used for two facial rooms, an open
area for two manicurist, a reception area, an office, a laundry room, and a unisex
restroom.

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

If this application is denied, the subject suite will not be able to offer massages as part
of their facility.

The Massage Establishment use is defined as a facility which is occupied and used for
the purpose of practicing massage therapy as defined in LVMC Chapter 6.52.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:

Requirement 1: The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title
6.

The proposed use will be required to comply with all applicable requirements of
LVMC Title 6 as a condition of their business license once issued. The proposed
use will be subject to regular inspections by the Department of Planning,
Licensing Division to ensure compliance.

Requirement 2: The use must be located on a secondary thoroughfare or larger.

The subject site the use is located on Durango Drive, a 100-foot Primary Arterial
as defined by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, meeting this
requirement.

Requirement 3: The use may not be located within 400 feet of any church/house of
worship, school, City Park, individual care center licensed for more
than 12 children, or any parcel zoned for residential use.

The proposed use is located on a parcel that is adjacent to a parcel residentially


zoned. The applicant has requested a Waiver to allow the use to be located zero
feet from a parcel zoned for residential use. Staff supports this request as there
is no direct access between the residentially zoned property and the subject site.
The only access available for the subject site is from Durango Drive. Although
the subject site is located on the southwest corner of Ackerman Avenue and
Durango Drive, there is no access to the commercial center from Ackerman
Avenue. The adjacent residents to the west of the subject site will have to travel
east on Ackerman Avenue, then proceed south on Durango Drive for a short
distance before being able to gain access to the subject site.

Requirement 4: The use may not be located within 1,000 feet of any other massage
establishment.

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

There is no other massage establishment within 1,000 feet of this proposed


location.

Requirement 5: The hours of operation shall be limited to the period between


6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., unless further limited by the City
Council on a case-by-case basis.

The proposed use meets this use as the hours of operation will be between 9:00
a.m. and 10:00 p.m.

RECOMMENDATION

With no direct access being available between the residentially zoned property and the
subject site, staff finds the proposed use can operate in a manner that is harmonious
and compatible with the existing surrounding commercial and residential uses and is
recommending approval of this request with conditions.

FINDINGS (SUP-68421)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious


and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed use will be incorporated into a spa like setting that will offer area
residents such services as facials, manicures and pedicures, and massages. The
proposed use is compatible with the existing surrounding residential and
commercial uses as it will be located within a commercial center specifically
designed to provide goods and services for area residents.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject site was specifically designed to provide a variety of goods and
services to area residents.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Access to the site is provided by Durango Drive, a 100-foot Primary Arterial as


defined by the Master Plan of Streets and highways. A 100-foot Primary Arterial is
more than adequate for the vehicular needs of the subject site.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.

One of the objectives of the General Plan is to minimize the reliance on the
automobile for shopping and services in newly developing areas. Approval of this
request will provide a service to the area residents. In addition, the proposed
Massage Establishment will be subject to regular inspections by the Business
Licensing Division of the Planning Department ensuring the publics health, safety,
and welfare.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed use was not able to meet Requirement Number Three which
states, The use may not be located within 400 feet of any church/house of
worship, school, City Park, individual care center licensed for more than 12
children, or any parcel zoned for residential use. Adjacent to the site along the
western edge of the property is property that is residentially zoned creating a zero-
foot distance separation between the two uses. The applicant has requested a
Waiver, which staff supports since there is no direct access between the
residential property and the subject property.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-10071) for a proposed 13,722 square-foot commercial
development with Waivers to allow a 15-foot rear yard setback where
20 feet is the minimum required, and Waivers of building placement,
04/05/06
perimeter, and foundation landscaping standards on 2.18 acres at the
southwest corner of Durango Drive and Ackerman Avenue. The
Planning Commission recommended approval, staff recommended
denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
35224) for an Accessory Package Liquor Off-Sale within a proposed
10/07/09 2,510 square-foot convenience store at 8053 North Durango Drive,
Suite 160. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
12/02/09 36130) for a Secondhand Dealer at 8053 North Durango Drive, Suite
130. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Required Review
(RQR-52209) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-35224) for
03/11/14
Accessory Package Liquor Off-Sale within an existing 2,510 square-
foot convenience store at 8053 North Durango Drive, Suite 160.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map
(TMP-64433) for a one-lot commercial subdivision on 1.93 acres at the
06/14/16
southwest corner of Ackerman Avenue and Durango Drive. Staff
recommended approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/02/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#243874) was issued for a beauty shop at 8053
09/05/13
North Durango Drive, Suite 110. The permit expired on 03/05/14.
An electrical permit (#326259) was issued for 8053 North Durango
09/15/16
Drive, Suite 110. The permit received its final inspection on 11/03/16.
A plumbing permit (#326654) was issued for 8053 North Durango
09/26/16
Drive, Suite 110. The permit received its final inspection on 11/03/16.
A building permit (#328130) was issued for a sign at 8053 North
10/17/16
Durango Drive, Suite 110. The permit is currently open.
A building permit (#329483) was issued for a Certificate of Occupancy
11/16/16
at 8053 North Durango Drive, Suite 110. The permit is currently open.
A building permit (#332841) was issued for a tenant improvement at
01/03/17 8053 North Durango Drive, Suite 110. The permit received its final
inspection on 01/11/17.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal
12/08/16
requirements for a Special Use Permit were discussed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
During a routine site visit, staff observed the subject suite within a
commercial center. No trash, graffiti, or miscellaneous debris was
01/05/17
observed onsite by staff. Staff did note the adjacent suite had window
signs that exceeded what was allowed by Title 19.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 1.44

Planned or
Surrounding Existing Land Use Existing Zoning
Special Land
Property Per Title 19.12 District
Use Designation
General Personal
Service
Office, Other Than
Listed
General Retail, Other
Than Listed with PCD (Planned
Subject C-1 (Limited
Package Liquor Off- Community
Property Commercial)
Sale Establishment Development)
Commercial
Recreation/Amusement
(Indoor)
Restaurant with Drive
Through
PCD (Planned R-PD6 (Residential
Single Family,
North Community Planned Development
Detached
Development) 6 Units Per Acre)
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
Liquor Establishment
(Tavern) PCD (Planned
C-1 (Limited
South Health Club Community
Commercial)
General Personal Development)
Service
Office, Medical or
Dental

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Planned or
Surrounding Existing Land Use Existing Zoning
Special Land
Property Per Title 19.12 District
Use Designation
PCD (Planned R-PD6 (Residential
Single Family,
East Community Planned Development
Detached
Development) 6 Units Per Acre)
PCD (Planned R-PD7 (Residential
Single Family,
West Community Planned Development
Detached
Development) 7 Units Per Acre)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Centennial Hills Sector Plan Y
Northwest Open Space Plan Y
Trails Multi-Use Equestrian Trail along Ackerman Avenue Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Durango Drive Primary Arterial Streets and 105 Y
Highways
Ackerman
Local Title 13 50 Y
Avenue

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
General 960 SF + 2 1:250 4
Personal Nail 2 Per
4
Service (Spa) Stations Station
2 Per
Massage
Room/
Establishment 2 Rooms 6
Minimum
(Proposed)
of 6
Commercial
Recreation/
4,195 SF 1:200 21
Amusement
(Indoor)
1:100
Restaurant
(Per
with Drive 2,513 26
SDR-
Through
10071)
Office, Other
1,174 SF 1:300 4
Than Listed
General
Personal 2 Per
802 SF 6
Service Chair
(Barber Shop)
General
Retail Store,
Other Than
Listed with
2,510 SF 1:175 15
Accessory
Package
Liquor Off-
Sale
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 86 86 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 82 4 82 4 Y

NE
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
The proposed use must be
located on a parcel with a
To allow a zero-foot
minimum distance separation
distance separation
of 400 feet from a parcel Approval
from a parcel zoned
zoned for residential use
for residential use.
when measured parcel line to
parcel line.

NE
SUP-68421



SUP-68421



SUP-68421

SUP-68421

SUP-68421

SUP-68421
SUP-68421


SUP-68421


SUP-68421


77

AA7A
7

777777777
7


A
b
b


A A


A
5

 b







7 777b7 7bA77A7
7777
777
b
A7A7AA7
77A7

7
7A

b77
A

A
A

77A

SUP-68421

b7 7A7
7A77AA7AAb77bbA
7

7 A777b77A7AA
7

777777777
7777777777

A7bbA77 7
7777777 77
7b77 7A77 777777777777
777 77777777777

77777777777 b




777777A77

bbA77b7 7A7
7

7

A
b
b


A A
A7bbA7A777777A77A7 777 7bb

A
5

b7 7b7
777bbA

7 7 b7 7A7
77 7
7 Ab777A77
7

b7 7A7
7Abb7A7Ab
7 7
7 7
7777

A77bb7A7Ab7AA
7 7
7 7 7
777

7
bbA77b7 7A77
77

A7bbA 7bb
b

7 77777
7
777
77 7

7 7777
7 7 77

777 7bb777 77
77

777 77777777777
777777
777777 7

bb7
7
7
7
7




A7A7AA7
77A7


7
7A

b77
A

A
A

77A

SUP-68421

7
7


A
b
b


A A


A
5

7
77 7

7
7

7
7777

7
777

7
b

7

7
7
7
7
A7A7AA7
77A7

7
7A

b77
A

A
A

77A

SUP-68421

7
7


A
b
b


A A


A
5
7777
777
b
A7A7AA7
77A7

7
7A

b77
A

A
A

77A

SUP-68421
7A7A77 bAb7 7
7A77 A77b7 b7
b777A75 A7b777b7
A777A7A77A b7 7A
77A7AA77A
b7557A7757

A77b77A

77b

5777A
A777775
575A
7



A77A777b
7b77b7

b7A7

A
b7

A b



A7A

7A7A777A7A

b7

7 7 b77A7 7


A
b b


7A7AA7Ab77 bAb7
A A


A
A757A777b b777A7b7 5

7b7A b77b77A7A7
75
b AbbA7b77A77A
bA7A77b
7AbbAb777757A7b
A7 7
7A7b77A7Ab777A7
A7b75A
7A777bAb77bb
A77A
777b7
A7A7b7

57 5


AA7777A7b7 bA bA77b7bA7A7AA77 bA

77bAAb7 775A7b bAb7 7A7A77A7b7557A


7A7A77
A7A77777A 7A7Ab7b Ab77b7 7577A77b
7A77
7777A7b77b 7b7 b777 A77 AbbA7A7b 7A777b
b777A75
75777b7 7775A b7A b77
7A7A7 A7 A7 b7757
bA77775 A7b777b7
b AbA77A7A75
A7A777bAb7 7A775 b77A7A 77A7
A7 b757AAb
bb77 775 7AbbA 7A7A7
b757 7b A7A77777
77b b77A7
b7
A77AbbAb A7
b7A7 A77
77757A
77 b77A7b77A7Ab7 b77
5A 7A777A
b7A7A 77bAb77bb 7A7A7
A7 5777A
7AA7 77
A7
A
777A

7 b75A7A
AbbA7A
Ab77 7A77A7A7
7A77A 77A
777   7bAb77b7A
A77A77 757b
7777 A 7b75b
7A7
77A7777A7 AA7A7b7775
A 757Ab
7A77A7 A777 A777bb777
77A 7A7
57b7A7A 77757
b AbbA77A77A
7777

77 7A7AA7Ab
A7
777AA77b 77A757A
777AA7 77b7
b77b757A7A b7A7b

b775A77A A7b775A777A
A77A77
AA7A77A7b7 7A7777A75A7
b77b7
777

b77b7A 7bA77775
777A77b
77A775 757A777A77AA7
777A7
777A 77bA77b7b77
A7 b77b757A7A
7A Ab777A7A
777bAAb b775A77 777
77A7 7A777Ab777b77
77A7Ab 77A7A7AAb7 77
bA
b77b7b 7bb7 b777577775
7575A7
b

Ab7A77A7A7575
777A7 b
77
A77 7A7A
777
777b
57A7 
A7
A7 A7A7
777b Ab77Ab
Ab7757b7 A7A7A777
A A77777
b77 A
A7A b7 b7757A7AA
75 A7
A7777A
bA7
777 
7b A

57A7AA A7A
77A
AAb7A
A A
7
A7 A7A A7A

7A A7A7A777
7777 b7 A
A A77777
A7 77A7 A7
A7A b7757A7AA
7AA

A
b7
77A
A A AAb
7A77A77b7A7 7 A
5AbA7b7Abb b7 b7

77b7bA75A A7b7
7A77A7A77A777 b77bA7
A7
A77A 57bA
7A7A7
7A7757bA7b7A 757bA
b
A7A7AA7


77A7

A
7757bA7A77b
A


7
7A


7 57 b
b A
7A7 7777777A
A77 77AA7 77 b77
77bA7A7A A
7777777A7b b
A7
A77b7A7757757 7A7577
A
777b7775 A
7A Ab A

57b A
757bA7A77b7A 7
b
b7
7A77A7b7A
A
A
A

77A

SUP-68421
A77b7
7A77b7
A7
777A bA77A
77A77777A777777 7A777b77777 b7
A7A7Ab7
7A7A
7 7
7Ab Ab77 Ab7A77b7A
7A77777
777Ab7
7b 75

Ab 7A7b7Ab77
5b
7b b77
7
Ab 7b
7
77
7

57A7A b7 7 777b
b7 b
b7A
A7
7 7AbbA7575
757b
7 7 A7A A7AA777
A
7

b77A7b
7A77777 Ab7775A
7 A7777Ab
7777 7 bb7A

7A77b
77777 7A77b
7 Ab7 Ab7
b77AbA
777777
5A77577A7
7777
7777



777777A7bA b
AbbA Ab7A77b77




A7777A
575

777bb7 A

A75A

A


A7bA777

7
7A7b777
A77b7Ab7A Ab7777b

A
7b7777 b
b

7 A7A7A7Ab7
A A
7b777bA

A
5
bb7A75A75
777Ab77


7Ab

77

7
b
A7AA777
b
7Ab7777
77A77A7A
7b77775Ab7
A777A7A7Ab7

7 7Ab777AA7Ab7
A7b7Ab7A77b77b

7 777757A7AA7A
7 75777

7 5b77

7 5777777A7Ab7777 777777b757Ab
7A7A 7bA77
7 7A77A7777A7A77 Ab77A77
775A7A77A7AA7
A7bA777
A7A7A7b7777b

A777A7A77777b7 A777A7A77777b
7777
777
b

bA5775b7Ab
A7A7AA7
77A7

7
7A

b77
A

A
A
A777A

77A

SUP-68421
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: GALENA EUROPEAN SPA - OWNER: SSB
PROPCO, LLC
8053 NORTH DURANGO DRIVE, SUITE #110
01/05/17
SUP-68421 [PRJ-68095] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: GALENA EUROPEAN SPA - OWNER: SSB
PROPCO, LLC
8053 NORTH DURANGO DRIVE, SUITE #110
01/05/17

SUP-68421
Agenda Item No.: 47.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
RQR-68072 - REQUIRED REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BOYER
SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER: ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK - For possible
action on a request for a Required Review of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-59539) FOR
AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING STANDARD TO ALLOW 429 PARKING SPACES WHERE
516 SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING SECONDARY SCHOOL at 7038 Sky
Pointe Drive (APN 125-21-102-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use -
Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-68369]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Parking Analysis
7. Action Letter for SUP-59539 [PRJ-58877]
8. Action Letter for RQR-62046
9. Protest Postcards
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68396]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER:
ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL

RQR-68072 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 40

NOTICES MAILED 841

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 2

PB
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68396]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

RQR-68702 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the approved conditions for Special Use Permit (SUP-59539).

2. Special Use Permit (SUP-59539) shall be reviewed in February of 2019 at a public


hearing. The applicant shall be responsible for notification costs of the review.
Failure to pay the City for these costs may result in the revocation of Special Use
Permit (SUP- 59539).

PB
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68396]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant operates a secondary school at 7038 Sky Pointe Drive, and as a part of
the entitlements to build the school they received approval of a Special Use Permit
(SUP-59539) to allow an alternative parking standard (429 spaces provided, where 516
where required) from the Planning Commission on July 14, 2015. One of the conditions
of the approval required a one-year review (RQR-62046), which was approved by the
Planning Commission on July 12, 2016. As the high school was not yet operational at
the time, a condition of approval required another review occur in February of 2017.

ISSUES

At the time of the previous one-year review (RQR-62046), one of the school
buildings was still under construction.
All buildings on the campus are now open and operational, however student
population (1,901 students) is well below capacity (2,369 students) and wont reach
capacity until 2019.

ANALYSIS

The Departments of Planning and the Department of Public Works have both completed
site visits to 7038 Sky Pointe Drive to observe the parking and circulation at the site.
Staff observed a fully operational campus, with available parking during both the
morning arrivals and afternoon releases of students.

Public Works staff also observed that during the Elementary School pick-up in the
afternoon, the queue of parents extended north to Elkhorn, and filled the right and left
turn storage on Elkhorn. No cars were actually stopped in a travel lane, but it was very
close. Theyll be working separately with the school on this issue to ensure that travel
lanes remain clear.

Student population supplied by the school show that the current enrollment at the
campus is 1,901 students, of which 265 students are in grades 11 and 12. Expected
enrollment will rise to 2,369 students in 2019, of which a total of 540 students will be in
grades 11 and 12. As a significant amount of that enrollment increase is in grades that
correspond with driving age students, staff is including a condition of approval for a
required review two years from the approval of this review.

PB
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68396]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Given the availability of parking spaces on site, staff recommends approval of this
Required Review (RQR-68072) with a further required review in two years time when
the school will be at full capacity.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved the Annexation (A-0003-64) of
05/12/64 approximately 5,000 acres generally located north of Lone Mountain
Road and west of Decatur Boulevard, including the subject property.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) to T-C (Town
12/07/98 Center) of a 1,468-acre portion of the Northwest, including the subject
site. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved the Town Center Development Standards
11/07/01 Manual, which designated the subject site as SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town Center).
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-15514) a 40-foot
public right-of-way between Sky Pointe Drive and Elkhorn Road. The
10/18/06
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The Order of
Vacation was recorded on 02/05/07.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-45940)
to amend the Planned Streets and Highways Map and Schedule 13-1A
and to modify Map 2C of the Transportation & Streets and Highways
Element of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan to remove the frontage
10/17/12 street alignment between Sky Pointe Drive and Elkhorn Road and to
designate Sky Pointe Drive as a frontage street - special design: town
center arterial from Tule Springs Road to the south end of the subject
site. The Planning Commission recommended approval and staff
recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP)-45941) for a
private school, primary and secondary with direct access/egress from
a Town Center Primary Arterial at the southeast corner of Elkhorn
Road and Sky Pointe Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
10/17/12
45943) for a proposed 280-unit multi-family residential development, a
139,250 square-foot private school, primary and secondary campus
and an associated encroachment agreement into the public right-of-
way on 24.45 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Sky
Pointe Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval and
staff recommended denial.

PB
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68396]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a Major Modification (MOD-45944) related
to GPA-45940 to amend the Special Land Use Designation from: SC-
TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) to: SX-TC (Suburban Mixed
Use - Town Center), to remove the Town Center Loop Road alignment
between Sky Pointe Drive and Elkhorn Road and to realign the Town
Center Arterial Alignment from within the subject site and extend it
along Sky Pointe Drive to the south end of the subject site. The
Planning Commission recommended approval and staff recommended
denial.
A two-lot Parcel Map (PMP-46559) on 24.09 acres at the southeast
03/06/13
corner of Sky Pointe Drive and Elkhorn Road was recorded.
Planning Department staff Administratively approved a Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-50697) for a Minor Amendment of an
09/24/13 approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-45943) for a Private
School, Primary and Secondary and a revised phasing plan on 12.14
acres at 7038 and 7058 Sky Pointe Drive.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use
Permit (SUP-59539) for an Alternative Parking Standard to allow 429
07/14/15 parking spaces where 516 spaces are required for a proposed
Secondary School (High School) at 7038 Sky Pointe Drive. A condition
of that approval required a one year review.
Planning Department staff Administratively approved a Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-59541) for a Minor Amendment to a
08/18/15 previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-50697) for
a proposed 9,812 square-foot addition to a 135,475 square-foot
Private School Campus on 12.19 acres at 7038 Sky Pointe Drive.
The Planning Commission approved a Required Review (RQR-62046)
7/12/16 of the Special Use Permit (SUP-59539). A condition of that approval
required a review in February of 2017.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


04/16/15 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#47503) was issued for civil improvements for a
03/18/13 proposed educational facility at 7038 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit
expires 01/14/15.
A building permit (#224306) was issued for on-site improvements at
03/26/13
7038 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit expires 09/26/13.

PB
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68396]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#224305) was issued for an educational building at
03/26/13
7038 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit was finalized on 08/14/13.
A building permit (#224308) was issued for a wall at 7038 Sky Pointe
03/26/13
Drive. The permit was finalized on 09/09/14.
A building permit (#224307) was issued for a trash enclosure at 7038
03/26/13
Sky Pointe Drive. The permit expired 11/21/13.
A building permit (#248530) was issued for on-site improvements and
01/16/14
hardscapes at 7038 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit is currently open.
A building permit (#248531) was issued for a wall at 7038 Sky Pointe
01/16/14
Drive. The permit is currently open.
A building permit (#249408) was issued for a metal shade structure at
01/16/14
7038 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit was finalized on 08/06/14.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine site visit performed by Planning staff, staff observed
1/5/17 the Secondary School (High School) was open and operational and
parking was available.
During a site visit performed by Public Works staff, staff observed
vacant parking stalls during both the morning and afternoon peak
traffic periods.

Public Works staff also observed that during the Elementary School
1/12/17 pick-up in the afternoon, the queue of parents extended north to
Elkhorn, and filled the right and left turn storage on Elkhorn. No cars
were actually stopped in a travel lane, but it was very close. Theyll be
working separately with the school on this issue to ensure that travel
lanes remain clear.

PB
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68396]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 12.19

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
SX-TC (Suburban
Subject
Primary School Mixed Use Town T-C (Town Center)
Property
Center)
MLA-TC (Medium-
Single Family,
North Low Attached T-C (Town Center)
Detached
Residential)
SX-TC (Suburban
South Undeveloped Mixed Use Town T-C (Town Center)
Center)
Single Family, ML (Medium Low R-CL (Single-Family
East
Detached Density Residential) Compact-Lot)
U.S. 95
West ROW (Right-of-Way) ROW (Right-of-Way)
Northbound

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Town Center Master Plan Y or N
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
T-C (Town Center) District Y or N
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Town Center
Town Center
Sky Pointe Drive Development 70 Y
Arterial
Standards Manual

PB
RQR-68072



RQR-68072



RQR-68072


RQR-68072

RQR-68072

RQR-68072

RQR-68072
b77Ab

b77Ab
7AA7 b7A77 b7A7

 b7A77 b7A7


Ab7

7



b77Ab

b77Ab

A7




b77Ab7 7A7b777 A77


A
b7A77 b77Ab
7 77b 7 A7A
77b A7 77b
A AA A7A
A A

7A777b7A7 7A7777b

b77Ab

b77Ab
A7AbA7A

Ab7
7AA7
b7A77 b7A77 b7A7 7A7b77


77


b77Ab

b77Ab

A7



b7A77 b7A7


b77Ab7 b7A77 b
b7 b7A77 b77Ab


7A7b77
A77
A7AbA7A

7A7777b7 7A777b7A

b77Ab

A7AbA7A7 b7A7

7A7b777 b77Ab
7AA7
7AA


 
77

b77Ab

b77Ab

77
A7 

b
b77Ab 
b7 b7A77
7A7b77

7A777b7A7 A7A7777b7 A7A77AA




A77777

bA777 7 7 7 7 7
7A

RQR-68072
b77Ab

b77Ab
7AA7 b7A77 b7A7

 b7A77 b7A7


Ab7

7



b77Ab

b77Ab

A7




b77Ab7 7A7b777 A77


A
b7A77 b77Ab
7 77b 7 A7A
77b A7 77b
A AA A7A
A A

7A777b7A7 7A7777b

b77Ab

b77Ab
A7AbA7A

Ab7
7AA7
b7A77 b7A77 b7A7 7A7b77


77


b77Ab

b77Ab

A7



b7A77 b7A7


b77Ab7 b7A77 b
b7 b7A77 b77Ab


7A7b77
A77
A7AbA7A

7A7777b7 7A777b7A

b77Ab

A7AbA7A7 b7A7

7A7b777 b77Ab
7AA7
7AA


 
77

b77Ab

b77Ab

77
A7 

b
b77Ab 
b7 b7A77
7A7b77

7A777b7A7 A7A7777b7 A7A77AA




A77777

bA777 7 7 7 7 7
7A

RQR-68072
7

7 7 7 7
7
7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7
7
7
7
7


A
A


A7 7 A




b7
A
bb bb
b7


bA bA
bA
A

A
A



7 7 7
7A
7A

7A

7A


b

77 A7
A7 A7
A7
b

7


7



7 7 7



A b


A 7Ab
7Ab
7
bA bA bA bA
7 7


77 7A

b
A
7bb
7A


7

b

A
A
A 7b
A A
7bb


b
7A
A

7
7
7

7A



7
7
7
7
7
7


7

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7

77A

A7bbAb77b7


7A77777777

bA777 7 7 7 7 7
7A

RQR-68072

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7


7
7
7
7




A7 b


bA



bA
7 bA bA bA bA bA


A7

A b
bA
A77 A7



bA

A
A

A7


A7
A
7 A7 bA bA bA


7 7


bA

b
7
7
7
7

A77

bA bA bA bA bA bA

bA



7
7
7
7
7
7


7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7

b77A

A7bbAb77b7


7A77777777

bA777 7 7 7 7 7
7A

RQR-68072
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68369] - REQUIRED REVIEW - APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER: ZIONS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
7038 SKY POINTE DRIVE
01/12/17
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68369] - REQUIRED REVIEW - APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER: ZIONS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
7038 SKY POINTE DRIVE
01/12/17
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68369] - REQUIRED REVIEW - APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER: ZIONS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
7038 SKY POINTE DRIVE
01/12/17
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68369] - REQUIRED REVIEW - APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER: ZIONS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
7038 SKY POINTE DRIVE
01/12/17
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68369] - REQUIRED REVIEW - APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER: ZIONS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
7038 SKY POINTE DRIVE
01/12/17
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68369] - REQUIRED REVIEW - APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER: ZIONS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
7038 SKY POINTE DRIVE
01/12/17
RQR-68072 [PRJ-68369] - REQUIRED REVIEW - APPLICANT: BOYER SKYPOINTE ACADEMY LP - OWNER: ZIONS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
7038 SKY POINTE DRIVE
01/12/17
RQR-68072




RQR-68072

RQR-68072
Agenda Item No.: 48.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68129 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Major Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review [Z-0055-72(2)] FOR A
PROPOSED DRIVE THROUGH ADDITION TO AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH
PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.60 acres at 3001 West Sahara Avenue
(APN 162-08-104-009), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-67967].
Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-68129 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to N/A
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 26

NOTICES MAILED 335

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-68129 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan Review [Z-
0055-72 (2)] shall be required, except as amended herein.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site and landscape plan, date
stamped 01/12/17, building elevations, and floor plan date stamped 12/13/16,
except as amended by conditions herein.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot on the north
perimeter landscape buffer where 15 feet is required.

5. An Exception from Title 19.08.110(C)(12)(c) is hereby approved, to allow no


parking lot screening adjacent to the right-of-way.

6. An Exception from Title 19.08.110(C)(12)(b)(i) is hereby approved, to allow no tree


on the parking island located at the northwest corner of the existing building and no
tree within the landscape located at the northeast corner of the property.

7. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

8. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

9. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Public Works

10. In accordance with Title 13.56.040, remove all substandard public street
improvements and unused driveway cuts on Sahara Avenue and Richfield
Boulevard adjacent to this site and replace with new improvements meeting
current City Standards concurrent with development of this site. The existing pan
style driveway accessing this site on Richfield Boulevard may remain as long as
the sidewalk along Richfield Boulevard meets current American with Disabilities
Act (ADA) requirements.

11. Grant a 20-foot wide Public Sewer Easement over the existing public sewer line
except where occupied by the existing building on this site prior to issuance of
permits for this site. Alternatively, re-route the existing sewer line into Sahara
Avenue. No structures and no trees or vegetation taller than three feet shall be
allowed within any Public Sewer Easements.

12. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site


Development Plan Review [Z-0055-72 (2)], for an existing restaurant with a drive-
through addition and building elevation remodel at 3001 West Sahara Avenue.

ISSUES

Pursuant to Title 19.08.070, the landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of-way shall
be 15 feet minimum. A Waiver request as part of this application is needed to allow
zero-foot landscape buffer. Staff does not support this request.
Pursuant to Title 19.08.110 (C)(12)(c), parking lots shall be screened from adjacent
roadways by a low wall or berm with a maximum height of thirty inches, a solid living
hedge with an approximate maximum height of thirty-six inches, or some other
screening method. An Exception of the parking lot screening is required as part of
this application is needed to allow no screening adjacent to the right-of-way. Staff
does not support this request.
Pursuant to Title 19.08.110 (C) (12) (b) (i), parking lot landscaping shall have one
tree at the end of each row of parking spaces. An Exception of parking lot trees is
required, to allow no tree on the parking island located at the northwest corner of the
existing building and no tree within the landscape located at the northeast corner of
the property. Staff supports this request, if approved.

ANALYSIS

The subject property is located in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zoning District and in
the Airport Overlay District with a height limitation of 200 feet. The proposed
modification of the subject property is subject to Title 19 standards and does not affect
the requirements of the Airport Overlay.

The applicant is proposing to add a drive-through window on the east side of the
building. Currently, there are nine parking spaces located on the east side of the
building and these will be eliminated by the proposed 12-foot wide drive-through. These
spaces will be moved to various locations within the property. There are currently a
total of 36 parking spaces 32 parking spaces are required. The submitted site plan
depicts 32 parking spaces.

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The proposed drive-through indicated on the site plan will wrap around the building
along the property line will be eliminated. As a result of adding the drive-through the
existing landscape buffer on the north property line. The applicant requests a Waiver of
Title 19.08.070 to allow a zero-foot wide landscape buffer where 15 feet is required
along public right-of-way (Sahara Avenue). Staff does not support this request.

There are four parking spaces provided fronting the right-of-way along Sahara Avenue.
Pursuant to Title 19.08.110(C)(12)(c), parking lots shall be screened from adjacent
roadways by a low wall or berm with a maximum height of thirty inches or a solid living
hedge with an approximate maximum height of thirty-six inches. The proposed
site/landscape plan does not include any of the screening along the northeast corner of
the property where these four parking spaces are to be located. The applicant requests
an Exception to allow no screening along Sahara Avenue. Staff does not support this
request.

The Department of Public Works has noted that there is an existing sewer line running
east to west, across the subject property on the north side of the building. A Public
Works condition has been added to address the granting of a sewer easement in this
location. No trees or vegetation taller than three feet shall be allowed as conditioned.
The site/landscape plan indicates the landscape island adjacent to the existing building
at the northwest corner and at the northeast corner of the subject property. There are
no required shade trees within these locations; therefore, the applicant is requesting an
Exception of the landscape material pursuant to Title 19.08.110 (C)(12)(b)(i), to allow no
trees within the parking lot landscaping located at the northwest corner of the existing
building and at the northeast corner of the property. Staff supports this request due to
the requirement for the sewer easement.

This Site Development Plan Review includes changes to the exterior elevation of the
existing building. The proposed exterior building materials will be composed of stucco,
metal coping and faux wood paneling. A variety of colors will be utilized on the
proposed elevations such as Orange Copper, Deep Brown, Beige, English Apple and
Silversmith. The elevation will include a fabric awning above the store front windows
and metal awnings over the building entrance and the drive-through window. A metal
access band is incorporated at the same height as the metal awning providing
continuous treatment on the east and west side of the building.

The applicant is requesting this Site Development Plan Review, to add a drive-through
window to an existing restaurant. The 12-foot wide drive-through, triggers the
requested waiver and exception as part of this request. Staff does not support the zero-
foot landscape buffer and exception of the parking lot screening. Therefore, staff
recommends denial of this request. If this application is approved, this Site
Development Plan Review is subject to conditions.

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (SDR-68129)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area; as the use will remain as a Restaurant.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is not consistent with Title 19.08 standards, due to the
Waiver request to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along the north property line,
Exceptions of the parking lot screening for the four parking spaces facing Sahara
Avenue, and of the plant material within the parking lot landscaping buffer.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic, as the proposed project will not change the site access and
circulation of the property.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area, as the landscaping
is existing and some new landscape will utilize drought tolerant landscaping for
the subject property. However, the lack of a landscape buffer adjacent to public
right-of-way is not appropriate for the area.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The building elevations employ a modern architectural style that incorporates


popouts, color changes and details that are consistent around the building. Such
features create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment. The proposed
elevations are harmonious and compatible with the development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed drive-through addition and building remodel will be subject to


building permit review and inspection, thereby protecting the public health, safety
and general welfare.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., Code Enforcement, etc.
The Board of City Commissioners approved the request for
Reclassification of Property (Z-0055-72) generally located on the south
08/16/72 side of West Sahara Avenue between Valley View Boulevard and
Richfield Boulevard. The City Planning Commission recommended
approval.
The City Planning Commission approved the request for Plot Plan
Review [Z-0055-75(2)] on behalf of Pizza Hut concerning property
11/13/75
located on the south side of West Sahara Avenue between Valley
View Boulevard and Richfield Boulevard.
The Planning Department administratively approved Site Development
Plan Review [Z-0055-75 (15)] for a proposed 350 square-foot addition
03/15/99
to an existing 2,520 square-foot Restaurant at 3001 West Sahara
Avenue.
A Code Enforcement case (#141751) was processed for graffiti on
05/27/14 buildings and block walls at 3001 West Sahara Avenue. The case was
closed on 05/28/14.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


01/22/10 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#2118) was issued for a 3,220 square-foot
03/16/79 Restaurant at 3001 West Sahara Avenue. The permit was finalized on
07/03/79
A building permit (#8951) was issued for a tenant improvement on an
02/23/81 existing Restaurant at 3001 West Sahara Avenue. The permit was
finalized on 01/07/85.
A business license (R09-00101) was issued for a Restaurant at 3001
01/01/51
West Sahara Avenue. The license is currently active.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting with the applicant was conducted to discuss
the Site Development Plan Review application requirements. The
drive-through egress was proposed with the removal of the north
11/29/16 perimeter landscape buffer. The applicant was advised that Site
Development Plan Review application will be a public hearing item
and it requires with a Waiver of the landscape buffer and an Exception
of the parking lot screening.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
A field check by staff of the subject property was conducted and noted
01/05/17 that an existing restaurant is still in operation on site. The property is
properly maintained.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.60

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C-1 (Limited
Restaurant C (Commercial)
Property Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
North Restaurant C (Commercial)
Commercial)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
South
Detached Residential) Residential)
General Retail
C-1 (Limited
East Store, Other Than C (Commercial)
Commercial)
Listed
Office, other than C-1 (Limited
West C (Commercial)
Listed Commercial)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 190 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front 10 Feet 16 Feet Y
Side 10 Feet 76 Feet Y
Corner 10 Feet 78 Feet Y
Rear 20 Feet 27 Feet Y
Max. Building Height N/A Feet 23 Feet Y
Screened,
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/ a Gated, and Y
Roof or Trellis Roofed
Mech. Equipment Screened As noted Y

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance


Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 55 Feet Y

Pursuant to Site Development Plan Review [Z-0055-72 (2)], the following


standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 0 Trees 0 Trees Y
East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 0 Trees 3 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 0 Trees 3 Trees Y
Parking Area 1 tree at the end of each
0 Trees 0 Trees Y
Trees row of spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North 15 Feet 0 Feet N
East 4 Feet 4 Feet Y
Existing Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Wall

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial 150 Y
Highways Map
Richfield
Local Title 13 60 Y
Boulevard

RG
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Required Provided Compliance
Floor Parking Parking
Use Area or Parking
Handi- Handi-
Number Ratio Regular Regular
capped capped
of Units
1,142 SF
waiting
and 1/50 SF 23
seating
Restaurant area
1,746 SF
Remainin 1/200
9
g gross SF
floor area
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 32 32 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Y
30 2 30 2
Required

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
15-foot landscape buffer Zero-foot landscape
Denial
along the north perimeter. buffer.

Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow no parking
Parking lot screening. lot screening to the Denial
adjacent right-of-way.
To allow no tree on
the parking island
located at the
One 24-inch box tree shall be northwest corner of
plant for each landscape the existing building Approval
island. and no tree within the
landscape located at
the northeast corner
of the property.

RG
SDR-68129



SDR-68129

SDR-68129 - REVISED

SDR-68129 - REVISED
SDR-68129


SDR-68129


SDR-68129


SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17
SDR-68129 [PRJ-67967] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS PIZZA, LLC
3001 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
01/05/17 & 01/12/17

SDR-68129 - REVISED
Agenda Item No.: 49.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68280 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY INSTITUTE BUILDING, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0035-85) FOR A
WAIVER OF TITLE 19.08 LANDSCAPING IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS on 0.33 acres
located at 820 South Valley View Boulevard (APN 139-31-801-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-67677]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY INSTITUTE BUILDING, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-68280 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 21

NOTICES MAILED 81

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

JB
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-68280 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Plot Plan Review (Z-0035-85) shall
be required, if approved, except as amended herein.

2 This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan
date stamped 12/21/16, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow no irrigation system.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

JB
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review for a Waiver of the Title 19.08
landscape irrigation requirement for the proposed removal of the required underground
irrigation system at 820 South Valley View Boulevard.

ISSUES

Title 19.08 requires installation of an irrigation system with all required landscaping.
This is a request to forego an irrigation system. Staff recommends denial.
This request is a result of Code Enforcement Case (#169726), which was processed
on 08/16/16 for trash and not watering vegetation on property located at 820 South
Valley View Boulevard. The case has not been resolved.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is currently developed as a general office building within the C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning district. The applicant has indicated in the submitted
justification letter that a bus stop was developed within the landscape buffer area, which
caused the water irrigation system lines to be severed within the landscape buffer area.
In addition, the applicant has indicated that the subject building on the property has
recently been renovated to try and obtain Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) Platinum certification. Since the new proposed plant species will use no
water, they will provide additional credits towards the platinum certification.

Plot Plan Review (Z-0035-85) required a combination of 15-gallon Eucalyptus Trees


and five-gallon Tam Juniper shrubs within the five-foot landscape buffers on the east
and west perimeter of the subject site. The applicant has proposed to install drought-
resistant landscape materials. The primary plant species utilized for landscaping is the
five-gallon Fishhook Barrel cacti, five-gallon Beavertail cacti, five-gallon Strawberry
Hedgehog cacti, Grizzly Bear cacti, five-gallon Texas Ranger shrubs and Silver Sage
Shrubs, none of which are native pursuant to the Southern Nevada Regional Plan
Coalition Regional Plant List. An Exception of plant materials is required to use the
proposed cacti and shrubs in lieu of the required trees. Staff believes the proposed
species will not survive without a functioning, in-ground irrigation system. Native
landscape requires years of supplemental irrigation to establish within the urbanized

JB
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

area, especially with the prolonged drought that southern Nevada has been
experiencing, any plant material installed without irrigation will most likely to perish. Plot
Plan Review (Z-0035-85) required landscape with a functional, in-ground irrigation
system, which the supporting property owner failed to maintain. As the current
conditions are self-imposed and could be resolved through the willingness of the
property owner to install a functioning irrigation system, staff has determined the
proposed project is not compatible with surrounding development in the area, as
demonstrated by the associated Waiver. Therefore, staff recommends denial of this
request with conditions.

FINDINGS (SDR-68280)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposal to waive Title 19.08 landscape irrigation requirements is not


compatible with the adjacent commercial development in the area. Staff has
determined that the proposed species will not survive without a functioning, in-
ground irrigation system, which will have an overall negative impact to the area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposal to waive Title 19.08 landscape irrigation requirements is not


consistent with the Title 19. Staff has determined the associated waiver will have a
negative impact to the overall development.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Primary site access is from Valley View Boulevard, a 80-foot wide Major Collector
Street. The right-of-way provides adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

JB
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The project design and style are not appropriate for the subject location and will
not be harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The primary plant
species utilized for landscaping is the five-gallon Fishhook Barrel cacti, five-gallon
Beavertail cacti, five-gallon Strawberry Hedgehog cacti, Grizzly Bear cacti, five-
gallon Texas Ranger shrubs and Silver Sage Shrubs, none of which are native
pursuant to the Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant List. The
proposed species will not survive without a functioning, in-ground irrigation
system.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

There are no structures proposed with this request, the design characteristics of
the proposed landscape buffer improvements are not compatible with
development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed development will be subject to inspections in order to protect the


public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning and Plot Plan
Review (Z-0035-85) from R-1 (Single Family Residence) to C-1
08/07/85 (Limited Commercial) of property generally located on the southwest
corner of Fulton Place and Valley View Boulevard for proposed offices
and retail commercial uses.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-
0296-94) for a 14-foot by 48-foot Off-Premise Sign located at 820
01/18/95
South Valley View Boulevard. The Board of Zoning Adjustment
recommended approval on 12/27/94.
The City Council approved a request for a Required Review [U-0296-
94(1)] of a previously approved Special Use Permit (U-0296-94) for a
02/16/00 14-foot by 48-foot Off-Premise Sign located at 820 South Valley View
Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended denial on
01/13/00.

JB
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Required Review [U-0296-
94(2)] of a previously approved Special Use Permit (U-0296-94) for a
07/05/01 14-foot by 48-foot Off-Premise Sign located at 820 South Valley View
Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended denial on
02/22/01.
The Planning Commission denied a request for the Required Review
[U-0296-94(3)] of a previously approved Special Use Permit (U-0296-
07/25/02
94) for a 14-foot by 48-foot Off-Premise Sign located at 820 South
Valley View Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for Special Use Permit (SUP-
4521) for a 14-foot by 48-foot, 40-foot tall Off-Premise Sign at 820
08/14/04
South Valley View Boulevard. The Planning Commission
recommended approval on 07/22/04.
The City Council approved a request for a Review of Condition (ROC-
29270) to delete Condition Number Five of a previously approved
10/15/08
Special Use Permit (SUP-4521) that limited one advertising sign per
face at 820 South Valley View Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for a Required Review (RQR-
34682) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-4521) for a 40-foot
08/03/11 tall, 14-foot by 48-foot Off-Premise Sign at 820 South Valley View
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval of this request.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-43991) to establish Redevelopment Area #2 and change the
04/18/12 future land use designation on various parcels within the
Redevelopment Area to C (Commercial) or MXU (Mixed-Use), which
included the subject site.
The City Council approved a request for a Required Review (RQR-
49210) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-4521) for a 40-foot
08/21/13
tall, 14-foot by 48-foot Off-Premise Sign at 820 South Valley View
Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of this request.
The City Council approved a request for a Required Review (RQR-
65210) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-4521) for a 40-foot
08/17/16
tall, 14-foot by 48-foot Off-Premise Sign at 820 South Valley View
Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of this request.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


01/28/14 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

JB
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#95884385) was issued for an Off-Premise Sign at
12/13/95 820 South Valley View Boulevard. The permit was finalized on
12/26/95.
A Code Enforcement case (#13373) was processed for the removal of
04/21/04 an Off-Premise Sign due to zoning violation. The case was resolved
on 06/23/04.
A Code Enforcement case (#23812) was processed for graffiti on
11/16/04 property located at 820 South Valley View Boulevard. The case was
resolved on 11/18/04.
A Code Enforcement case (#50752) was processed for graffiti on
02/22/07 property located at 820 South Valley View Boulevard. The case was
resolved on 03/06/07.
A Code Enforcement case (#129365) was processed for graffiti on
05/29/13 property located at 820 South Valley View Boulevard. The case was
resolved on 07/01/13.
A Code Enforcement case (#169726) was processed for trash and not
08/16/16 watering vegetation on property located at 820 South Valley View
Boulevard. The case has not been resolved.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application conference was held with the applicant to discuss
11/09/16 submittal requirements for a Site Development Plan Review with a
Waiver to eliminate the required irrigation system.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine site inspection staff observed a commercial
development with all planting materials removed from the landscape
buffer in the rear of the property. In addition, the majority of the
01/05/17
required planting materials have also been removed from the eastern
landscape buffer adjacent to Valley View Boulevard and replaced with
combination of small cactus plants.

JB
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.33

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C-1 (Limited
General Office MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
North General Office MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
South General Retail MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
East Springs Preserve PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Public or Private
West PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
School, Primary

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Plot Plan Review (Z-0035-85), the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
East N/A 2 Trees 0 Trees N
West N/A 1 Tree 0 Trees N

JB
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Landscaping and Open Space Standards


Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 3 Trees 0 Trees N
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
0 Trees 0 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
East 5 Feet 5 Feet Y
West 5 Feet 5 Feet Y
Not Not
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Indicated Indicated

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Valley View Master Plan of
Major Collector 80 Y
Boulevard Streets & Highways

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To remove the
Title 19.08 landscape
required irrigation Denial
irrigation requirements
system.

Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
Landscape Buffers are To utilize a
required to provide 15-gallon combination of 5- Denial
trees and five-gallon shrubs gallon shrubs only

JB
SDR-68280



SDR-68280


SDR-68280


SDR-68280


SDR-68280


SDR-68280


SDR-68280


SDR-68280


77777777777777

777777777777

7777777777777777

SDR-68280
77777777777777777

7777777777777


SDR-68280

SDR-68280
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY INSTITUTE
BUILDING, LLC
820 SOUTH VALLEY VIEW BOULEVARD
01/05/17
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY INSTITUTE
BUILDING, LLC
820 SOUTH VALLEY VIEW BOULEVARD
01/05/17
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY INSTITUTE
BUILDING, LLC
820 SOUTH VALLEY VIEW BOULEVARD
01/05/17
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY INSTITUTE
BUILDING, LLC
820 SOUTH VALLEY VIEW BOULEVARD
01/05/17
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY INSTITUTE
BUILDING, LLC
820 SOUTH VALLEY VIEW BOULEVARD
01/05/17
SDR-68280 [PRJ-67677] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAFETY INSTITUTE
BUILDING, LLC
820 SOUTH VALLEY VIEW BOULEVARD
01/05/17
777777
77777777
77777$A
7
77777b77

77

b777
777
7$A

77b

7 777

77777777777777
77777777777>7777
7777777777777
7777777777777A77
77777777777777>7
777777>7777777
777777777777777
77777>7

7

777777777777
7777777777777777
777777777777777777
77b7777777777777>
7777777777A77777

77

77777777777

7 777777
7 b777777777>
7 77777777777
7777
7 7777777$b7
7 7777777777777>


7777777777777

777777777A7777777


777777

77777777777777$A
$A

SDR-68280
777777
77777777
77777$A
7
77777b77

77777777777777
777777777777>7777
7777777777>777
77777>777777777777
77777777777777777777
A7777777777777777
7777777777777>77
777777777777777777
777777777777777777
77777777777777777
777777777777777>7777
77777777777777777
777777777

777777
7 777777777777

7 7777777777777
7777>
7 7777777777777

A777777777>77777777
>7777777777777777
777777777777777777
7>777

77777777777777
77777777777777777
7777777777777777>7
77777777777777>77777
7>77777777>77777
77

777A7b7b7b7bb
b777
$777


777777

77777777777777$A
$A

SDR-68280
Agenda Item No.: 50.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68300 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
GENE WOODS RACING - OWNER: T-U P R II, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL
RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (OUTDOOR) FACILITY WITH A WAIVER FROM
DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS on 3.63 acres at 222
South Main Street (APN 139-34-101-009), M (Industrial) Zone and C-M
(Commercial/Industrial) zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-68298]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: GENE WOODS RACING - OWNER: T-U P R II,
LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-68300 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 31

NOTICES MAILED 111

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

FS
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-68300 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan date stamped 01/11/17
and building elevations date stamped 12/29/16, except as amended by conditions
herein.

2. A Waiver from all Downtown Centennial Plan Casino Core District architectural
standards for a proposed modular building is hereby approved.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

7. Contact the City Engineers Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development


of this project with the Multi-Modal Connection between Downtown and Symphony
Park project, and any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site.
Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.

8. with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for assistance
with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site prior to
submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits,
whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.

FS
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for a Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Outdoor) go-cart track with a


waiver of Downtown Centennial Plan architectural standards on an existing parking lot
at 222 South Main Street.

ISSUES

The request is to utilize an existing Hotel/Casino parking lot for an outdoor go-
cart track. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A waiver from Downtown Centennial Plan architectural standards is required to
allow the use of a modular building on the subject site. Staff recommends denial
of the waiver request.
The track will be located behind an existing chain link fence and no measures are
proposed to screen the use from the public right-of-way.
The potential noise pollution resulting from a go-cart track is not compatible with
the Hotel Residence use located to the east across Main Street, as well as other
businesses in the immediate vicinity.

ANALYSIS

The request is to utilize an existing Hotel/Casino parking lot for an outdoor go-cart track.
The track will be located directly south of an existing parking garage on a parking lot
that is currently used for Plaza Hotel employees. The track configuration will vary as the
track barriers are movable and not anchored into the ground. Vehicular access will be
provided only to track employees via a sliding gate on the south side of the track.
Pedestrian access will be provided by an entryway from the Main Street frontage.
There is an existing chain link fence on the perimeter of the subject site that will remain
in place, and nothing is being proposed to screen the use from the right-of-way.
Additional chain link fencing will be installed interior to the site around the proposed
race track. A go-cart repair area will be located within a 30x40 space underneath the
existing parking structure, which will be out of the public view. No landscaping is
proposed or required with this Site Development Plan Review request.

FS
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

A 672 square-foot modular building will be utilized as an on-site ticket office. The
proposed modular building does not meet the architectural standards required for the
Casino Core District of the Downtown Centennial Plan. The modular building does not
have a visually interesting faade, nor does it have the articulated roofline and/or
cornice required by the Downtown Centennial Plan. A waiver has been requested to
provide relief from all Downtown Centennial Plan architectural standards. Modular
buildings that are permanent in nature are not appropriate within the downtown core
and do not contribute to the overall design themes of the Downtown Centennial Plan.
Staff recommends denial of the waiver request.

The justification letter states that the go-carts are powered by a 6.5 horsepower
gasoline engine that will propel the carts to a speed of 15 to 20 miles per hour during
normal operations. The speed of the carts can be controlled remotely by a track
supervisor in case of emergencies. The applicant states that the carts have a
mechanical muffler, and a manufacturer document was provided showing static engine
noise measurements. Per the manufacturer, a static test with a background noise of
55db would result in a 67db reading at a distance of one meter, and a 60 db reading at
ten meters.

An operating hotel residence, which is intended for extended stay lodging, is located less
than 200 feet from portions of the proposed track. The provided noise measurements are
static tests which do not take into account noise levels during engine acceleration or the
cumulative effect of multiple go-carts operating at the same time. With the constant drone
of multiple go-cart engines under acceleration, it is likely that noise pollution will become a
nuisance for businesses in the immediate vicinity, as well as guests at the residence hotel,
since no measure are proposed to mitigate the noise transference.

The proposed go-cart track is not appropriate for the area as the track will not be screened
from public view, the modular building does not meet the intent of the Downtown
Centennial Plan architectural standards, and the carts may cause considerable noise
pollution for the surrounding area. Staff recommends denial of the request and associated
waiver.

FINDINGS (SDR-68300)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

FS
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The proposed go-cart track is not compatible with adjacent development as the
track will not be screened from public view, the modular building does not meet
the intent of the Downtown Centennial Plan architectural standards, and the go-
carts may cause considerable noise pollution for the surrounding area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The site is not consistent with the architectural standards of the Casino Core
District of the Downtown Centennial Plan and a waiver has been requested to
provide relief from those standards.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Site access and circulation does not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

The proposed building materials are not appropriate for the area or the City as the
modular building does not meet the architectural standards of the Downtown
Centennial Plan. There is no landscaping proposed with this development.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The proposed modular building does not meet the architectural standards of the
Casino Core District of the Downtown Centennial Plan. The proposed modular
building does not have a visually interesting faade, nor does it have the required
articulated roofline and/or cornice. As such, the proposed modular building is not
harmonious or compatible with development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

Appropriate measures have been taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

FS
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0001-70) from C-V (Civic) and
C-2 (General Commercial) zones to C-M (Commercial/Industrial) and
02/12/70
M (Industrial) zones for a hotel casino on 7.34 acres on the west side
of Main Street between Ogden Avenue and Carson Avenue.
The Board of City Commissioners approved an Architectural Review
(AR-0004-81) for an expansion of a hotel by 500 rooms at 1 South
07/15/81
Main Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0137-99) for an
02/16/00 automobile rental facility within an existing hotel and casino at 1 South
Main Street. Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
Staff administratively approved a Site Development Plan Review
07/14/11 (SDR-42227) for sidewalk and plaza area improvements on a portion
of 1.49 acres at 1 South Main Street.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-
01/12/16 62273) for an automobile rental facility. Staff had recommended
approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


02/13/15 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held and general Site Development
12/22/16
Plan Review submittal requirements were discussed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A pre-application meeting was not required nor was one held.

Field Check
A field check was conducted and the subject site is a surface parking
01/05/17
lot for an existing hotel/casino.

FS
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 3.63

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
C-M (Commercial -
Subject Surface Parking
C (Commercial) Industrial); M
Property Lot
(Industrial)
C-2 (General
North Parking Garage C (Commercial) Commercial); M
(Industrial)
C-M (Commercial -
Surface Parking
South C (Commercial) Industrial); M
Lot
(Industrial)
C-2 (General
East Hotel Residence C (Commercial) Commercial); M
(Industrial)
Union Pacific
West N/A N/A
Railroad

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Centennial Plan N*
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District N*
A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y
Downtown Casino Overlay District Y
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A
*Waivers requested from Downtown Centennial Plan architectural standards.

FS
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plans, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width N/A 100 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front N/A 100 Feet Y
Side N/A 10 Feet Y
Corner N/A N/A Y
Rear N/A 0 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage N/A N/A Y
Max. Building Height N/A N/A Y

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Main Street Primary Arterial Highways Map 50 Y

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:

Parking Requirement - Downtown


Gross Floor Base Parking Requirement Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Commercial
1:200 sf
Recreation/Am
672 SF of gross
usement
floor area
(Outdoor)

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 4 10 Y


Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 3 1 9 1 Y

Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table should be used to
illustrate the requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.

FS
SDR-68300



SDR-68300



A7
7 bbA7A7777bb
7 A7AbA777
7 bA7b777A
7AbA7

7A7
A77A
7
7 A77b7b7AA7

7
7A 7 AA7A77777bb7
Ab7 A7AbA77b
77A7AA
A7 7 A77AA77
bbA7
7AA 7b

AbA7A7A777Ab
77
A7A7

A7A77 b7AA

Ab777b7bb

A
A
Ab b
A


7


A7AA


AA777bA



7 b7b
777A7A

7 AA7A7Abb


b777A
b77AbA

bb7b7

7A7A7bA7A

A7A7AbA

77777Ab
A
b

7 Ab
7

b
Abb





b7 SDR-68300 - REVISED 7


A 7 7 7
)
7)A7bA
A bA
b
b
A7AbA7b b A
b77A
77Ab
7 7 7 77A77


A

77A77 A
A b
A77A7b7 7
AA77A
7 7 7
bA A A
bA7A7A777
77bA7

A b
A77b7
7
77'77
b A

b7A77 7
7 7 7

7++ b A )
A
b7A7)A
7A77 7 A7 b7 7+
A
A777
77 77
) A
AbA b
)7A7AbA7b
7 7
77 b7

A
7
A

b7
AA777bA
77A7
A7A77



7A


A
A


7

7b 7
A


7


b



A


A
A
bA


7A



b7
7

A
A7

7b

b
7 bbA7A7777bb
7


7 A7AbA777


7A

bA

A 7
7
7 bA7b777A



7AbA7

b
A
A7
A 77
A




7 7 7 b
b
A7AbA7b )
7)A7bA
A bA 77Ab


A

77A77 A
b 77A
7 7
77A77 A77A7b7
A
A b
AA77A
7 7 bA7A7A777

bA A A
77bA7
A77b7

A b

77*77 b7A77

b A
7
7

SDR-68300 7.. b7A7)A
b A )
A
7 A7 b7 7. A777

A 7
7
) A
AbA b
)7A7AbA7b

7 77 b
7AA7
77777
77

77AA7
777

SDR-68300
A7777
7AA777
7

A7777
77AA77
77



77
7

SDR-68300

SDR-68300

SDR-68300
SDR-68300



SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: GENE WOODS RACING - OWNER:
T-U P R II, LLC
222 SOUTH MAIN STREET
01/05/17
SDR-68300 [PRJ-68298] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: GENE WOODS RACING - OWNER:
T-U P R II, LLC
222 SOUTH MAIN STREET
01/05/17

SDR-68300
Agenda Item No.: 51.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
SDR-68409 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: PROVIEW SERIES 31, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-62361) FOR
A PROPOSED FIVE-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT WITH A WAIVER TO
ALLOW A UTILITY STRUCTURES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY on 0.25 acres on the
east side of 4th Street, approximately 125 feet north of Garces Avenue (APN 139-34-311-137),
C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-68176]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 3/15/2017

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Protest Postcard
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROVIEW SERIES 31, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-68409 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 31

NOTICES MAILED 551

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 1

RG
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-68409 CONDITIONS
Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan Review


(SDR-62361), except as amended herein.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan,
building elevations, date stamped 01/26/17 and floor plan, date stamped 01/31/17,
except as amended by conditions herein.

4. A Waiver from Section VII.A.1 of the Downtown Centennial Plan is hereby


approved, to allow above-ground utilities in the right-of-way where not allowed
along the street frontage.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

7. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,


Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

9. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-62361) and all other applicable site-related
actions.

RG
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site


Development Plan Review (SDR-62361) for a five-story, 66-foot tall mixed use
development with 1,251 square feet of commercial floor space and 48 multi-family
residential units located on the east side of 4th Street and approximately 125 feet north
of Garces Avenue. The request is to allow the RPDA utility unit to be located within the
right-of-way and above ground. This amendment includes the relocation of the two
RPPA utility units that were previously approved adjacent to the south property line and
to the proposed location of the RPDA utility unit.

ISSUES

The site plan and floor plan show one RPDA utility unit and two RPPA above ground
meter units in the 4th Street amenity zone in front of the site. Placement of the
RPDA meter unit requires a waiver of Office Core District requirements, which staff
does not support. A waiver has already been approved for the RPPA units to be
located within the right-of-way.

ANALYSIS

Projects within the Office Core District are subject to the requirements of the Downtown
Centennial Plan. The proposed project was previously approved under Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-62361) for a mixed use development. Mixed-Use is
a conditional use in the C-2 (General Commercial) District.

The applicant is requesting a waiver to allow the RPDA utility unit to be located within
the public right-of-way within the amenity zone. The RPDA utility unit was previously
located within the building footprint. Also included in this request are two RPPA utility
units that were previously approved with a waiver under SDR-62361 adjacent to the
southwest corner of the property. This request will relocate the two RPPA units to the
amenity zone next to the RPDA. Due to relocation of these utility units within the
amenity zone, one existing shade tree will be removed. Tree spacing is consistent with
the streetscape standards of the Downtown Centennial Plan.

As a result of the relocation of RPDA and RPPA units, the buildings fire riser has been
relocated as well. The building elevation has been reversed from the elevation plan as
approved by SDR-62361. There are no changes to the material and colors of the
proposed building.

RG
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The Office Core standards of the Downtown Centennial Plan specifically require all
utility vaults to be located underground or incorporated within the building footprint as
previously approved, and the site plan as configured shows that all utility units are
above-ground installations. Above-ground utilities in the right-of-way are discouraged
because they pose a tripping hazard, are not aesthetically compatible with surrounding
development, are typically not screened and are exposed to vandalism or damage due
to vehicle accidents. Staff therefore recommends denial.

FINDINGS (SDR-68409)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed utility structures are not compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area. There are no other similar utility structures in the right-
of-way along 4th Street.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The Waiver has been requested to allow the utility structures to be located within
the right-of-way. This request deviates from the Downtown Centennial Plan
Development Standards and staff does not support this request.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

The site access and circulation has been addressed under Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-62361).

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

Existing streetscape installed by the City of Las Vegas and meets the Downtown
Centennial Plan streetscape requirements. However, installing utility structures
within the public right-of-way; therefore, are not appropriate for the area and for
the City.

RG
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

Above-ground utilities in the right-of-way are unsightly, undersireable and


obnoxious in appearance and are not harmonious and compatible with the
development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

Utility structures located in the right-of-way may present hazards to both


pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
62361) for a proposed five-story Mixed-Use Development, including
1,251 square feet of commercial space and 48 multi-family residential
06/15/16
units on the east side of 4th Street, approximately 125 feet north of
Garces Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
denial.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


06/24/15 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There is no relevant building permit or business licensing history on this site.

Pre-Application Meeting
Submittal requirements for an amendment to the previously approved
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-62361) were discussed. The
12/15/16 RPDA was previously approved within the threshold of the proposed
mixed-use building. The applicant proposes to relocate the RPDA
within the right-of-way at the amenity zone along 4th Street.

RG
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
The site is vacant with areas of scattered debris. The parcels to the
01/12/17 north area vacant, while the parcel to the south contains a vacant
commercial building.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.25

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C-2 (General
Undeveloped C (Commercial)
Property Commercial)
C-2 (General
North Undeveloped C (Commercial)
Commercial)
Office, Other Than C-1 (Limited
South C (Commercial)
Listed Commercial)
General Retail C-2 (General
East C (Commercial)
Bailbond Service Commercial)
Mixed-Use C-2 (General
West C (Commercial)
Development Commercial)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (Office Core District) N
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

RG
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Master Plan of Streets
4th Street Major Collector 80 Y
and Highways Map

Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance


10-foot existing
10-foot sidewalk Y
sidewalk
5-foot existing
5-foot amenity zone Y
Major North-South Streets amenity zone
(4th Street) 2 date palm tree
25 BTH date palms in
cluster existing
30-foot increments (1 Y
(3) 24-inch shade
tree required)
trees

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
Utilities shall be located
underground for all new To allow above
developments. In no case ground utility
Denial
shall they be located along structures within the
the street frontage of the right-of-way.
project

RG
SDR-68409



SDR-68409


7
b7A7 A7A77 b7AA7 7 A
b7A
b
77Ab77
b7 7A7A
b
b7 7A7A7
A7bbA7b77b
bbAb7bA bA77A7b77A
b77 A7Ab7
7 7 b77AA7
A77
7 7 b

7 A7 AA77 b7A7
77A7A77
7 7bb
7
 


 
   


  7 7b b
7 77Ab777
7b7
b77 77 b7 7
77 A777777b7 A777AbbAb7
b77 77AA7 7

7777A7 77AA77 7
bbA7A777
A77 7 7
7 7bbA

7AA7A7
7 A 7bbA
AA

A7A777 777777777
A7bbA7 7bbA
777 77
A7A777 b 777 7777
7
77 7

A7Abb7A77 7

A7A77 77

A7Abb7A777 7A777b7

A77b

A77b

A77b

7A7Ab7 A77b
7bb7A
7

77A
7A
A7A77


777Ab

7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A

A7
A7A

7A
77Ab77


b
7 7

7

A7
7

A77b
Ab
A
A7A

A77b
A7
7


b
A7 b7

A

bbA

A7bA7
bAbA
7

A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A



7A 7
77A


A777b
7

7A777
A bA7 777
7

SDR-68409 - REVISED
A77b

A77b

7
7A
7A

bA
77 A77b
7Ab77b
A7A A77b

7

777b
A7A77


777Ab

7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A
A7A77Ab

7Ab77b
7AbA

A7A
77Ab77

7
7A

b
7

7

7A
7

A77b
77A
Ab
A
A7A

A77b
A7
7


b
A7 b7

A

bbA

A7bA7
bAbA
7

A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A



7 7

AbA77A777
A bA7 777
7

SDR-68409 - REVISED
7A 7A

7

7 7

7 7A 7 7A

7 7

7 7

7 7

7 7

7 7

77 77

7A7 A7A7A7
bA7 7 77
b bA7 777

7A

7 7

7 7A 7 7A
A7A77


777Ab

7A

7 7
77Ab77

7 7


7 7

7 7

7

7 7

777 7
7

7A7 7A77

bA7 7 77
A bA7 777

7


SDR-68409 - REVISED

SDR-68409 - REVISED

7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A

b
7
7

A7A77
777Ab

77Ab77

77 7A


b
A7 b7

A

bbA
7

bAbA
A7 A7 A7 A7 A7 A

7

77 7A
A bA7 777
7

SDR-68409 - REVISED
Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab

b
b
b
b
b

Ab
77 77 77 7

7
A7A77
777Ab

A

A

7
7A777

AbA
77Ab77

b
Ab
7

77 77 77 77 7

7

A
7

b
b
b
b
b
b

Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab


7

7A7777
A bA7 777
7

SDR-68409 - REVISED
Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab

b
b
b
b
b

Ab
77 77 77 7

7
A7A77
777Ab

A

A

7
AbA
77Ab77


7A77777

b
Ab

77 77 77 77 7
7

b
b
b
b
b
b
b

Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab7 Ab


7

7A777777
A bA7 777
7
SDR-68409 - REVISED

SDR-68409
b77A7A7 b77A7A
bA7 7
b bA7

A7A77
777Ab

77Ab77

AA7b7


7

7
7

A

7

b77777 b7777
bA7 7
A bA7 7

SDR-68409
77A
AAb7A7A
b777777b7AA

b7
AAbb
b77A

A777
AAbA7
b7b7A

A777
AAbA7
b77

bb

bb bA A
7bb7bA7A
bb 
b7bb77 77Ab
77
777Ab
A7A77

b7AA7A
A
A bA7

SDR-68409
77A777A77A


A77A777 A77A777
A
AA77A
bA

bAA7
77Ab7
7
777A77A
A A 777Ab
A bA7
A7A77


SDR-68409
7A7 A7A7A7
bA7 7 77
b bA7 777
7A

A7A77
777Ab

77Ab77

A77A


7

7
7

7A7 7A77

bA7 7 77
A bA7 777

7


SDR-68409
SDR 68409
Proview Series 31, LLC

E side of 4th Street, N of Garces Avenue


Proposed 48 multi-family unit mixed use development.

First Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6.65 319


AM Peak Hour APARTMENT [DWELL] 48 0.51 24
PM Peak Hour 0.62 30

Second Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11.03 14


AM Peak Hour GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF] 1.25 1.56 2
PM Peak Hour 1.49 2
.
Total Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6.65 333


AM Peak Hour APARTMENT [DWELL] 48 0.51 26
PM Peak Hour 0.62 32

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


4th Street
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,514
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 361

Bonneville Avenue
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,552
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 364

Garces Avenue
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,564
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 125

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
4th Street 30,540
Bonneville Avenue 30,540
Garces Avenue 15,600

This project will add approximately 333 trips per day on 4th St., Bonneville Ave. & Garces Ave. Currently, 4th is at about 15
percent of capacity, Bonneville is at about 15 percent of capacity and Garces is at about 40 percent of capacity. With this
project, 4th and Bonneville are expected to be at about 16 percent of capacity and Garces to be at about 12 percent of
capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 32 additional cars, or about one every two
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: PROVIEW SERIES 31, LLC
EAST SIDE OF 4TH STREET, NORTH OF GARCES AVENUE
01/12/17
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: PROVIEW SERIES 31, LLC
EAST SIDE OF 4TH STREET, NORTH OF GARCES AVENUE
01/12/17
SDR-68409 [PRJ-68176] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: PROVIEW SERIES 31, LLC
EAST SIDE OF 4TH STREET, NORTH OF GARCES AVENUE
01/12/17

SDR-68409 - REVISED

SDR-68409 - REVISED

SDR-68409 - REVISED

SDR-68409
Agenda Item No.: 52.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
ROC-68393 - REVIEW OF CONDITION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CARDENAS -
OWNER: LAMANZA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Review of Condition of an
approved Special Use Permit (SUP-38860) TO REMOVE CONDITION #8 WHICH STATES,
"ALL BEER AND WINE COOLERS SHALL REMAIN IN THEIR ORIGINAL
MANUFACTURER''S CONFIGURATION OF FOUR OR SIX PACKS" on 6.8 acres at 4700
Meadows Lane (APN 139-31-111-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian)
[PRJ-68115]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Support Postcard
ROC-68393 [PRJ-68115]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CARDENAS - OWNER: LAMANZA, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ROC-68393 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 25

NOTICES MAILED 569

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 0

CS
ROC-68393 [PRJ-68115]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

ROC-68393 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the approved conditions for Special Use Permit (SUP-38860),


except as amended by conditions herein.

2. Condition Number Eight of the approval for Special Use Permit (SUP-38860) shall
be removed to allow the sale of beer and wine coolers in configurations other than
four and six packs.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CS
ROC-68393 [PRJ-68115]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to remove Condition Number Eight of Special Use Permit (SUP-38860)
which states, All beer and wine coolers shall remain in their original manufacturers
configuration of four or six packs. The subject site is home to Cardenas Grocery Store
located at 4700 Meadows Lane.

ISSUES

A Review of Condition is required to remove Special Use Permit (SUP-38860)


Condition of Approval Number Eight which states, All beer and wine coolers shall
remain in their original manufacturers configuration of four or six packs. Staff
recommends denial.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is home to Cardenas Grocery Store. It currently holds business license
permit (#L15-00228), which allows for the sale of packaged liquor. The applicant is
requesting the removal of the condition in order to offer a wider variety of packaged
liquor options to their customers. Other than the subject grocery store, currently there
are no other active liquor related licenses within the subject shopping center.

Staff supports the original condition placed by the Planning Commission and
recommends denial of the applicants proposal to have Condition Number Eight
removed. If the condition is removed as requested, the applicant will no longer be
limited to selling beer and wine coolers in configurations of four and six packs only.

FINDINGS (ROC-68393)

The Special Use Permit (SUP-38860) for a 500 square-foot accessory package liquor off-
sale use within a grocery store was approved on September 23, 2010 subject to
conditions. Removal of Condition Number Eight will allow the applicant to sell beer and
wine coolers in configurations other than four and six-packs.

CS
ROC-68393 [PRJ-68115]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council denied the request to Rezone (Z-0102-73) 100 acres
from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) and C-V (Civic) to C-1 (Limited
01/23/1974
Commercial) for a Regional Shopping Mall. The Planning Commission
recommended approval.
The Board of City Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 1014 to
Rezone (Z-0102-73) 100 acres from R-1 (Single-Family Residential)
02/05/1975 and C-V (Civic) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) for a Regional Shopping
Mall as required by the District Court and affirmed by the Supreme
Court of Nevada.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-
0102-73) for property located at the northeast corner of Decatur
12/28/1977
Boulevard and Meadows Lane. The City Planning Commission
recommended approval on 12/08/1977.
The Planning Department administratively approved Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-38861) for modified landscape materials and
08/30/10 elevations associated with the proposed conversion of an existing
76,637 square-foot general retail store to a grocery store on 6.31 acres
at 4700 Meadows Lane.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use
Permit (SUP-38860) to allow a 500 square-foot Accessory Package
09/23/10 Liquor Off-Sale use within a proposed 66,926 square-foot Retail
Establishment (Grocery Store) at 4700 Meadows Lane. Staff
recommends approval of this request.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-43991) to establish Redevelopment Area 2 and change the
04/18/12 future land use designation on various parcels within the
redevelopment area to commercial or mixed use. The Planning
Commission recommended approval on 03/13/12.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
53863) for a proposed 2,649 square-foot Auto Title Loan use with
waivers to allow a 100-foot distance separation from a residential use
08/20/14
where 200 feet is required and to allow a 130-foot distance separation
from a similar use where 1,000 feet is required at 4700 Meadows
Lane, Suite #110.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


08/11/10 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

CS
ROC-68393 [PRJ-68115]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


Building Permits were issued against Plan Check C-0142-78 for a new
1978
Retail Building located at 4700 Meadows Lane.
A Business License (#D16-00004) was issued for a Department Store
05/10/79 at 4700 Meadows Lane. This license expired and was marked out of
business 01/13/2009.
A Building Permit (#161092) was issued for a Non-Work Certificate of
04/28/10 Occupancy for 4700 Meadows Lane. A final inspection was completed
on 04/28/2010.
A Business License (#G60-00077) was issued for a full service grocery
11/24/10
store. The license remains active.
A Business License (#C05-02754) was issued for a tobacco dealer
11/24/10
within a grocery store. The license remains active.
A Business License (#C08-01953) was issued for amusement
11/24/10
machines. The license remains active.
A Business License (#G50-07504) was issued for cell phone sales.
12/23/10
The license remains active.
A Building Permit (#176028) was issued over the counter for interior
03/14/11 work to retail suites 110-150. This permit has not received a final
inspection.
A Business License (#G01-2423) was issued for 15 restrictive gaming
07/12/11
slots within Cardenas Market. The license remains active.
A Business License (#R10-01074) was issued for a 55 seat Subway
04/09/12
Restaurant. The license remains active.
A Business License (#L15-00228) was issued for the sale of packaged
05/21/13
liquor. The license remains active.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
12/12/16
submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not held, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found a well maintained
01/05/17
shopping center. The site was free of debris.

CS
ROC-68393 [PRJ-68115]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 6.8

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C-1 (Limited
Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Commercial)
Right-of-Way (US
North Right-of-Way (US 95) Right-of-Way (US 95)
95)
C-2 (General
Restaurant MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Minor Auto Repair MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
South
SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Landscape buffer
Commercial) Commercial)
Single-Family L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
Detached Residential) Residential)
SC (Service C-1 (Limited
East Shopping Center
Commercial) Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
Convenience C-2 (General
West MXU (Mixed Use)
Store Commercial)
P-R (Professional
Office O (Office)
Office and Parking)

Master Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CS
ROC-68393



ROC-68393



ROC-68393


ROC-68393


ROC-68393 [PRJ-68115] - REVIEW OF CONDITIONS - APPLICANT: CARDENAS - OWNER: LAMANZA, LLC
4700 MEADOWS LANE
01/05/17
ROC-68393 [PRJ-68115] - REVIEW OF CONDITIONS - APPLICANT: CARDENAS - OWNER: LAMANZA, LLC
4700 MEADOWS LANE
01/05/17

ROC-68393
Agenda Item No.: 53.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
ROC-68407 - REVIEW OF CONDITION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
ECLIPSE THEATER LV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Review of Condition of
an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-52105) TO DELETE CONDITION #6 WHICH STATES,
"MINORS SHALL ONLY BE PERMITTED IN SUCH AREAS WHEREIN SPIRITUOUS,
MALT OR FERMENTED LIQUOR OR WINES ARE SERVED ONLY IN CONJUNCTION
WITH REGULAR MEALS AND WHERE DINING TABLES OR BOOTHS ARE PROVIDED
SEPARATE FROM THE BAR IN CONFORMANCE WITH TITLE 6.50 on 0.8 acres at 814
South 3rd Street (APN 139-34-401-014), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ-68308]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: ECLIPSE THEATER LV, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL

ROC-68407 Staff recommends APPROVAL, with conditions

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 33

NOTICES MAILED 1048

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

PB
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

ROC-68407 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the approved conditions for Special Use Permit (SUP-52105) and
(SUP-53030), except as amended by conditions herein.

2. Condition number six of Special Use Permit (SUP-52105) shall be deleted.

3. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.

PB
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Planning Commission approved Special Use Permit (SUP-52105) which allowed a
Tavern Limited Establishment on January 14, 2014, subject to conditions. This allowed
alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with a movie theatre at 814 S. 3rd Street. The
movie theatre was constructed and opened for business in late 2016. The movie
theatre only allowed those 21 years or over to attend, but the applicant is seeking to
allow minors to attend movies at the theatre. The applicant is requesting to have
condition number six of the Special Use Permit removed. Condition number six states,
Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented
liquor or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining
tables or booths are provided separate from the bar in conformance with title 6.50.

ISSUES

A Review of Condition was requested to remove Special Use Permit (SUP-52105)


Condition of Approval number six which states, Minors shall only be permitted in
such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented liquor or wines are served only in
conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or booths are provided
separate from the bar in conformance with title 6.50.
The applicant is working with Business Licensing staff to develop a security plan that
will assure the business operates in conformance with Title 6.5.
The alcohol service in the cinema seating spaces will be limited to one drink served
by the server to the seated patron and the patron would be limited to no more than
one drink at a time, which is in keeping with Title 6.5 and is how other similar
businesses currently operate in dining room settings.

ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to eliminate condition number six of the approved Special
Use Permit (SUP-52105) which states: Minors shall only be permitted in such areas
wherein spirituous, malt or fermented liquor or wines are served only in conjunction with
regular meals and where dining tables or booths are provided separate from the bar in
conformance with title 6.50. This condition was placed on this approval to ensure
conformance with title 6.5, which regulates liquor control.

PB
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The applicant proposes to allow minors to attend movies and be seated only in the
cinema seating areas, which operate as dining rooms with food service during the
movies. In the cinema seating area servers respond to call buttons to serve alcoholic
beverages along with food items. All servers will be trained to monitor service and
consumption inside the cinema seating areas to ensure that no minors are served or
consume alcohol, and will only serve a single alcoholic beverage per appropriate aged
patron.

The applicants justification letter states that the restaurant, lounge, patio, bar seating
and bar will all have permanent signage prohibiting minors in those areas.

Business Licensing will work with the applicant to develop a security plan that allows
them to comply with the requirements of Title 6.5 prior to making any changes to the
business license or theatre operations. As such, staff recommends approval of this
request with conditions.

FINDINGS (ROC-68407)

The Special Use Permit (SUP-52105) for a tavern limited establishment was approved by
the Planning Commission on January 14, 2014, subject to conditions. Removing the
condition will not allow the business to operate in a way that does not conform with Title
6.5. The applicant is working with Business Licensing to develop a security plan that will
satisfy Title 6.5 requirements for this type of business. Other similar businesses already
operate as is being proposed by the applicant.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0100-64) to reclassify
property, including the subject parcel, in the area generally bounded
by Main Street, Bonanza Road, Las Vegas Boulevard and Charleston
12/16/64
Boulevard from R-1 (Single Family Residential), R-4 (High Density
Residential), C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2
(General Commercial).
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
10/19/05 8578) for a proposed mixed-use development at 814 South 3rd Street.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

PB
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-8577) for a 65-story mixed-use development consisting
of 22,000 square feet of commercial space and 425 residential units
and a waiver of the Centennial Plan Building Stepback requirement on
0.80 acres at 814 South 3rd Street. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for Special Use Permit (SUP-
8579) for a proposed 760-foot tall building where 200 feet is the
maximum building height allowed in the airport overlay district at 814
South 3rd Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
25160) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-8578) for a proposed
Mixed-Use Development at 814 South 3rd Street.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
25161) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-8577) for
a 65-story mixed-use development consisting of 22,000 square feet of
12/05/07 commercial space and 425 residential units; and a waiver of the
Centennial Plan Building Stepback requirement on 0.80 acres at 814
South 3rd Street
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
25163) of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-8579) for a proposed
760-foot tall building where 200 feet is the maximum building height
allowed in the airport overlay district at 814 South 3rd Street.
A technical review of a submitted Parcel Map (PMP-33178) was
01/27/09
completed. This map has not recorded.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use
Permit (SUP-52105) for a proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment use
at 814 South 3rd Street.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development
01/14/14
Plan Review (SDR-52106) for a proposed 53,885 square-foot, three-
story commercial recreation/amusement (indoor) facility (walk-in
theater) with a Tavern-Limited Establishment and Restaurant at 814
South 3rd Street.
The Department of Planning approved a request for a minor
amendment Special Use Permit (SUP-53030) of an approved Special
04/18/14
Use Permit (SUP-52105) for a proposed Tavern-Limited use at 814
South 3rd Street.

PB
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Department of Planning approved a request for a minor
amendment Site Development Plan Review (SDR-53029) of an
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-52106) for a proposed
55,329 square-foot, three-story commercial Recreation/Amusement
(Indoor) Facility (walk-in theater) and Restaurant at 814 South 3 rd
Street.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


03/06/14 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#254989) was issued for the Eclipse Theatre,
10/27/2015
occupancy was granted on 10/30/2016.
10/16/2016 A business license (G64-07354) was issued for valet parking
10/31/2016 A business license (G64-07567) was issued for the movie theatre
10/31/2016 A business license (P64-00269) was issued for a tavern limited

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held where the submittal requirements
12/23/16
and deadlines were discussed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine site visit and found an active Movie Theatre
1/5/217
business.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.79

PB
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Commercial
Subject C-2 (General
Recreation/Amuse MXU (Mixed Use)
Property Commercial)
ment (Indoor)
R-4 (High Density
Residential) with a
Multi-Family
North MXU (Mixed Use) Resolution of Intent to
Residential
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Multi-Family C-2 (General
South MXU (Mixed Use)
Residential Commercial)
R-4 (High Density
Residential) with a
Multi-Family
East MXU (Mixed Use) Resolution of Intent to
Residential
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Undeveloped
C-2 (General
West Office, Other Than MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
Listed

Master Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay - Downtown South District Y
A-O (Airport Overlay) District 200 Feet Y
Live Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

PB
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
3rd Street Local Street N/A 80 Y
Secondary Planned Streets and
Gass Avenue 80 Y
Collector Highways Map

Parking Requirement - Downtown


Base Parking
Gross Requirement Provided Compliance
Use Floor Area Parking Parking
or Number Parking
Handi- Handi-
of Units Ratio Regular
capped
Regular
capped
Shopping
Center
[Commercial
Recreation/A
musement
(Indoor),
55,329 SF 1: 250 SF 222
Tavern-
Limited
Establishment
, Restaurant,
Office, and
Retail]
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 222 44
Regular and Handicap Spaces Y*
215 7 41 3
Required
Loading
55,329 SF 3 1 Y
Spaces
*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are
not subject to the automatic application of parking requirements. However,
the above table should be used to illustrate the requirements of an analogous
project in another location in the City.

PB
ROC-68407



ROC-68407


7 7 7 7
A7bAbA
AA77AA7A
77A7A7

7AbA7 7Ab
7AA7 7777A7b
7777A7b

A7A77Ab777A
7A77777A
A7A777Ab777
b
777A

AA77A7777
777
7 AA777$
7
7$777$7777A
777
b77$7
7

7
7 AA777A7777
7
7Ab 7 AA777$
7 8
$777$777A

77
A77b7
7

777
7 b7 7A77b7
b7Ab77A7777
$$b777$
7$7777$777A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

77

A7Ab77A7777

A7b


A7

bbA

7$777$77A


777777777
A77 7A
7

7 A7
A

A7A7 b b


b 7 7 AA7 A7 7 b A
A
A

AA7A7 7 A 


7 7 Ab A
A A$b A7 Ab 7 7 7 b 7 AA7 7 A b7Abb77 7 A

77777 7777
7 7 b 7 b A A7
7 7 7 7 b
A77 7 A
7 7 7 7 7 7


7 A7 b $A Ab
A777
b A7 A7 A7 7 7 b 7 7 7 77777
A 777
7 b b A7 b $A
7 b b A7 7 A7 b 777A7
77777
7 7 AA


7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7


777A77A


A7 7 $7 7 A7 b
A 77777

7
7 AA7 A

7
7777
b A7 $A7 A7 7 A7 b
777
A7 7 A7 A7 7 7 7 7 A 777777
7 A7 7 A7 b 7
777777
7 7Ab 7 AA7 7 7 b A
7 7 7 7 7 7 b A7 7 7 A7 b

7 A7
Ab777 7 A7 7 A7 b

A7A
77b 7 AA7 b A

7
A7 A 7 7 A7 b

777 777 77777


777Ab A
7 7 7 7
7 7 7 b
777 777 $7 7 7 A7 b
777

b7
b
b
7 b7A

b77$7
A
7 b 7 7 AA7 7 b 7 A7 7 b

A77 7 $7 b 7 A7 b 7 b 7 7 b

7777777 777
b 7 7 7 7 7 A7 A
7
7Ab7 7 b 7 A7 7


7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b 7 7 Ab 7 b 7 b 7 b 7

7


7

b 7 7 AA7 7 b 7 A7 7 b

7 A7 b Ab 7 7 7 b A7 A
b 7 Ab

7 b 7 7 7 b A7 A
7 b 7 Ab
7 A7
7 7 7 Ab 7 7 Ab A7 b b 7 b 7 b
b 7
7
7 7 7 A7 7 7 b A7 A
A7 Ab 7 b 7 A7 7 A7 7 A

7
b 7 7 b 7 b 7 A7 7 b

7 7 7 AA 7 7 $
7 Ab 7 A b

7
7Ab
7 7 7 b b A7 A7 $7 7 $A7 A7 A
777
A7A7AA7
AbbA77A


Ab
b77$7
b77A

7
7


7

AbbA77A
7 777

7 A

A7bb7

A
bA777

A7 b
7 7 7 7
A

7

bA A7
77bA7A

A7A77A777A7A
7bA7A777

ROC-68407
7 7 7 7

A7bAbA
AA77AA7A 77A7A7

7AbA7 7Ab
7AA7 7777A7b
7777A7b
b
A7A77Ab777A
7A77777A
A7A777Ab777

777A
b77$7

7
777
AA77A7777
7Ab 7 7
AA777$
777

77
A77b 7$777$7777A
7 7

777
7
AA777A7777
7 8
AA777$
$777$777A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7 7A77b7

77
A7b b7Ab77A7777
bbA $$b777$
7$7777$777A

777777777
A



A7Ab77A7777

A7

7$777$77A
7
A77 7A

77777 7777
A7 b b


A7A7 A
A
b 7 7 AA7 A7 b

7 7 7 7 7 7


7 7 Ab A
AA7A7 7 A
b A$b A7 Ab 7 7 7 b 7 AA7 7 A b7Abb77 7 A
A 7 7 b 7 b A A7
7 7 7 7 b A77 7 A
A777
7 A7 b $A Ab 77777


77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7


A7 A7 A7 7 7 b 7 7 777
A 777A7
7 b b A7 b $A

7
7 b b A7 7 A7 b 77777
777A77A
7 7 AA
A7 77777
A7 7 $7 7 A7 b
7777
7 7 AA7 A
7Ab b A7 $A7 A7 7 A7 b
777
7 7 7 7 777777
7 A7 A7 7 7 7 7 A 777777
Ab777 7 A7 7 A7 b

A7A
77b 7 AA7 7 7 b A
7 b A7 7 7 A7 b

7
777 777 77777
777Ab A
7 7 7 7 7 A7
777 777 7 7 A7 7 A7 b
777
7 AA7 b A
A7 A 7 7 A7 b

b 7 7 b

b77$7
$7 7 7 A7 b
b


A7

7777777 777
b7
7
b7A
A
7Ab


7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b 7 7 AA7 7 b 7 A7 b

7 $7 b 7 A7 b 7 b 7 7 b

7
b 7 7 7 7 7 A7 A

7 b 7 A7 7
b 7 7 Ab 7 b 7 b 7 b 7

7

7 b 7 7 AA7 7 b 7 A7 b
A7
7 A7 b Ab 7 7 7 b A7 A
b 7 Ab

7 7 b 7 7 7 b A7 A
b 7 Ab

7 7 7 Ab 7 7 Ab A7 b b 7 b 7 b
b 7

7 7 7 A7 7 7 b A7 A
A7 Ab 7 b 7 A7 7 A7 7 A

7
7Ab
b 7 b 7 b 7 A7 b

7 7 7 AA 7 7 $
7 Ab 7 A b


Ab
777

7 7 7 b b A7 A7 $7 7 $A7 A7 A
A7A7AA7
AbbA77A

b77$7

7
b77A

AbbA77A
777

7 A

A7bb

A
bA777

A7 A
7 7 7 7
A

7

bA A7
77bA7A

A7A77A777A7A
7bA7A777

ROC-68407
7 7 7 7 7

A7A7

7
7 7A77777777b77
A 7A7A777
77 777
7 7777 7777 7 7777777
77777777
77
777I777777
77777
777A7
7 7 77777777777
7
77777
777
7A7b77A7 7


7
7 8

77
77
b7 7A77b7

7


7A7A7A77




7
$7A7b7


A
A

b b

7 A7A7A7A77 bb7 A
A
7 A7 A7 7777 777

7 $7777A7777A7b

A7 77777777
7 $777A7A77A77
A777
77777
777
777A7
77777
777A77A
77777

A 7777

A
A 777
7$7A7
b 777777
b A 77 777777
A A7 A
bA7A7 bA7A7
77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 $7A7$7
7
A7 $7A7
777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 77
Ab7 A7$A77$7777A
7 $777A7$77A77
7
A77
7 $777A7$777$7A7b
$ 7 bA7A7A7bA7A7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7 bA7A7A7$7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A77b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7A
7 b7AbbA77Ab
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 b777A777A77A
7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 A7A7bA
7 77A77A7$A7b7A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 $7A7b
7 b7A77A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 77$77bbA
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77$777bbA7A7$
7 b

77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77
7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7$
7
77

77
77

77

b
77

7 7 7 7
77

7 7 7 7

7
7
77
A A $7$
A 7777 777 777 A
77
Ab


7

77A
b7 777

A b A b
A A A A A

7
7$7A7
77
bA7A7
777

bA7A7
A

A7A7AA7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7
777 777 777

777 777 777 77


$
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

77
77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7


7 7 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77

77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7
b77A77A777b7A7

A
7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7

7 777 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

77
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77
7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 A7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7$

77
7 7
7 A7bb7
7

7bA
7 bb7
b7

77

77

77

77

A7 A7777
$7$

77 77
A7
77 77
7 A 7 A 7
A
A
bA
77bA7A



7A7A7

A7
7777
A

ROC-68407
7 7 7 7 7

A7A7

7 7A77777777b77
777
7 7777777

77777777
777I777777
777A7
7 77777
7
7 77777777777
777
77777
7
7
7 8

b7 7A77b7

$7A7b7
7


A
A

b b

A
A
7

$7777A7777A7b7

A7 77777777
7 $777A7A77A77
A777
A7 A7 7 7 7 b7 7 7 7 7 7 77777
b
777
A7 A

777A7
A A
A
77777
A
A7 777A77A
77777
7$7A7 7777
77 777
777777
7 777777
777 777 77

7 7

7 77
7 A7 bAbA77b

$ A7 $7A7$7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 A7 $7A7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 $777A7$77A77
A77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 $777A7$777$7A7b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 bA7A7A7bA7A7
7 bA7A7A7$7
7 7 777 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7A77A7777
7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 b7AbbA77Ab

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b777A777A77A
7 A7A7bA
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 77A77A7$A7b7A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

77
7 7 $7A7b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7 77$777bbA7A7$
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7$
77

A
A
b
$7$
77
7 7
77

77A
b7 777

b
A

7 7 7 A
7 7 7 b7 7 A A
A
A A

A 7$7A7
77
777

777 777 777 777 77


A

A7A7AA7

7 $
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
b77A77A777b7A7

7 A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7

77
b

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7A7A777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7$
77
7 7
7A7b77A7 7 A7bb7
7
7 7bA7
77 7 bb7
b7
A
77
A
A7 $7$ 7A7A7A777 A7777

77 A7

7 7
77
bA
77bA7A


77A7 bb7
A7
7777 777
A

ROC-68407
7 7 7 7

777
7 7
777
7
7
7 8
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
b7 7A77b7

777 7777 7777 7777 7777 777 777 777 777 777 777 77

b b


A
A




A A777

77
77777
777
777A7
77777
777A77A
777 777 777 777 777 777 77
777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 77 77777
bbA
7777


777 777
777777
777
777777

77

777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 77

b7
b
A



7

A



7

A7






7

7






7 7 7

b
A
A

A
777 777 777 77 A7
7



A
7
A7
A


A777

b 7 7
777


A
A 7
A7A7AA7

A
777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 A7
7 7 7


7 7 A
A



b77A


7
7


7

b7



7
7

7



7


7 7 7

A7 A7
7




7
A
7

7 7 7 7 7 7

7 A

$7$7A7 A7bb7

A
bA777

A7 A
7 7 7 7 7
A

7

bA A7
77bA7A

A7A77A777A7A
7bA7A777

ROC-68407
7 7 7 7

777
7 7
777
7
7
7 8
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
b7 7A77b7

77

777 777 777 777 77









77


7
A7A7A7A


A
A
b7Ab7


7A7
77777
77Ab7
7
A


7A

7
A7 A7 A7 A7 A7

A7
A777






77777
7A7 7A7 7A7 7A7 7A
777
777A7
77777
777A77A
77777


7777

777

777777






777777



7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7





7 7
b7





77
7A77






A A


A
A





77
7 A A A A A A
77 A A

A
A
A
A
A
A

7
A7
A
A


7
77

A
7
777

777
7
b A



777

A7
A A A A A A bb


A
A
A
A
A
A

7


7 7 
A7A
777

A
7
A77b7

A
7 A
A
A7A7AA7

7

7 77 7
b A7 AA
7 A
A




A7
7
A
7 7 7
b77A

777
A



7

7
7

7

7
7

A


7
A7
A7 A7



7
AA
7A7 7A7 7A7 7
7

b
b
b


A
7

A7


A

7
7
7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 A

A7bb7

A
bA777

A7 A
7 7 7 7
A

7

bA A7
77bA7A

A7A77A777A7A
7bA7A777

ROC-68407
ROC-68407 [PRJ-68308] - REVIEW OF CONDITIONS - APPLICANT/OWNER: ECLIPSE THEATER LV, LLC
814 SOUTH 3RD STREET
01/05/17
77

7 77
7 77b
77777#7
777

7 77
7 7777
7 777
7
7
7 7 A7
7
77777b7b77777
7A 77777

7A7b777777777b7
77777767777b
b777b7777777
7 7777777777

777777777777
777777777A77
777777777777
76777777777
7777777777777
777777777777
777777A7777677777
7777777777777
777777777777
7

777777777777

777

77bA7Ab7A

A Ab A


A7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77
7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7777777777777777

77777'

ROC-68407

ROC-68407

ROC-68407

ROC-68407

ROC-68407

ROC-68407

ROC-68407

ROC-68407
Agenda Item No.: 54.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
VAC-68554 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTORY
MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a
20-foot wide alley between E Street and F Street; south of Jackson Avenue, Ward 5 (Barlow)
[PRJ-68175]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTORY MISSIONARY BAPTIST
CHURCH

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAC-68554 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 14

NOTICES MAILED 13

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

NE
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175]
Conditions Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAC-68554 CONDITIONS

1. The limits of this Petition of vacation shall be the entire alley between E Street
and F Street and between Jackson Avenue and Monroe Avenue.

2. This Petition of Vacation shall be amended to reserve a 20-foot Public Sewer


Easement.

3. A Public Drainage Easement to be privately maintained, acceptable to the Flood


Control Section of the Department of Public Works, shall be reserved through the
Order of Vacation. Alternatively, provide a technical drainage study to justify that a
reservation for a drainage easement is not warranted.

4. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation
application are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the
recordation of an Order of Vacation. Existing public streetlights, if any, shall be
removed and returned to the City yard. Alternatively, the streetlights may remain if
the applicant disconnects them from public electrical service and installs a new
private electrical service to energize the lights. Such reassignment of streetlights
shall be coordinated with the Traffic Electrical Field Operations (TEFO) section of
the Department of Public Works.

5. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval
have been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of public
improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient
security for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance
of the City of Las Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if
necessary because of technical concerns or because of other related review
actions as long as current City right of way requirements are still complied with and
the intent of the vacation application is not changed. If applicable, a five foot wide
easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all
vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will remain dedicated and
available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public easement
corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any right-
of-way or easement being vacated must be retained.

6. Reservation of easements for the facilities of the various utility companies together
with reasonable ingress thereto and egress there from shall be provided if
required.

NE
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175]
Conditions Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

7. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design


standards of all City Departments.

8. If the Order of Vacation (or Order of Relinquishment of Interest if a Patent


Reservation) is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City of Las
Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then
approval will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.

NE
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a petition to vacate a 20-foot wide public alley located between E Street and F
Street, south of Jackson Avenue and north of Monroe Avenue. The alley will be
incorporated into an existing Church/House of Worship site that spans the entire block.

ANALYSIS

Vacation procedures are detailed in Title 19.16.080. As this is public right-of-way, only
one of the adjacent property owners must consent to the vacation petition. In this
instance, all property adjacent to the subject alleyway are owned by the same owner
who has given consent and submitted this petition to vacate the alley.

The Department of Public Works has presented the following information concerning
this request to vacate certain public street right-of-way:

A. Does this vacation request result in uniform or non-uniform right-of-way


widths?

This is not applicable as the Petition of Vacation will completely eliminate the
rights-of-way for the alley between E Street and F Street between
Jackson Avenue and Monroe Avenue.

B. From a traffic handling viewpoint will this vacation request result in a reduced
traffic handling capability?

No.

C. Does it appear that the vacation request involves only excess right-of-way?

No, it is to eliminate an alley which is currently surrounded by property


owned by the same church.

D. Does this vacation request coincide with development plans of the adjacent
parcels?

Unknown at this time. The surrounding property is all owned by the same
church and they may incorporate it into their church campus.

NE
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

E. Does this vacation request eliminate public street access to any abutting
parcel?

No. All Parcels have the same access to existing public streets.

F. Does this vacation request result in a conflict with any existing City
requirements?

No.

G. Does the Department of Public Works have an objection to this vacation


request?

No.

FINDINGS (VAC-68554)

As no existing parcel would be landlocked and the alley segment will not be needed for
proposed development, staff recommends approval of the proposed vacation. If denied,
the alley would remain in its current configuration.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal
12/15/16
requirements for a petition to vacate an alley was discussed.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine field check staff observed the subject alley. Nothing of
01/12/17
concern was noted by staff.

NE
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject
Alleyway Right-of-Way Right-of-Way
Property
Parking Facility
C-2 (General
North Church/House of MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
Worship
R-4 (High Density
Parking Facility
Residential)
South MXU (Mixed Use)
Church/House of C-2 (General
Worship Commercial)
East E Street Right-of-Way Right-of-Way
West F Street Right-of-Way Right-of-Way

Master Plan Areas Compliance


West Las Vegas Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District 175 Airport Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
West Las Vegas Walkable Community Plan Y
Trails Pedestrian Path Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Downtown Redevelopment Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

Functional Actual
Governing Compliance with
Street Name Classification of Street Width
Document Street Section
Street(s) (Feet)
E Street Local Title 13 50 Y
F Street Local Title 13 50 Y

NE
VAC-68554



VAC-68554


VAC-68554



VAC-68554

VAC-68554

VAC-68554
VAC-68554

7 AA77AbA



777
VAC-68554
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175] - VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTORY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH
BETWEEN E STREET AND F STREET; SOUTH OF JACKSON AVENUE
01/12/17
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175] - VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTORY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH
BETWEEN E STREET AND F STREET; SOUTH OF JACKSON AVENUE
01/12/17
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175] - VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTORY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH
BETWEEN E STREET AND F STREET; SOUTH OF JACKSON AVENUE
01/12/17
VAC-68554 [PRJ-68175] - VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTORY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH
BETWEEN E STREET AND F STREET; SOUTH OF JACKSON AVENUE
01/12/17

VAC-68554
Agenda Item No.: 55.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
DIR-68163 - DIRECTOR''S BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - THE BOARD OF REGENTS
OF THE NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION - For possible action on a request
regarding the Cooperative Campus Development Agreement for the College of Southern Nevada
Northwest Campus on approximately 44.09 acres at the northwest corner of Elkhorn Road and
Grand Montecito Parkway (APNs 125-17-401-006 and 125-17-801-004), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-
68166]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 3/15/2017


OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Staff Report
3. Cooperative Campus Development Agreement
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE NEVADA SYSTEM OF
HIGHER EDUCATION

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
DIR-68163 Staff recommends APPROVAL
.

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 58

NOTICES MAILED RJ only

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for possible action regarding a Development Agreement between the
College of Southern Nevada (CSN) and city of Las Vegas at the northwest corner of
Elkhorn Road and Grand Montecito Parkway.

ISSUES

This agreement will replace the agreement previously approved by the City Council
on 05/01/13.
The previous development agreement envisioned a mixed-use campus with on-site
residential, educational, and commercial uses. The College of Southern Nevada has
determined that their needs have changed, and the new agreement will allow for the
development of a campus without the on-site residential component.
The proposed development agreement is generally consistent with the previously
approved document; however, notable changes have been identified in the analysis
section of this report.
A permitted use table is included as Exhibit B of the document.
The Development Standards Manual will govern the development of the subject site
and is included as Exhibit C of the document.

ANALYSIS

On February 20, 2008, the College of Southern Nevada (CSN) and the city of Las
Vegas entered into a development agreement to build an academic urban village in the
northwest area of town. Section 2.07 of the original development agreement established
an 18-month deadline from the February 20, 2008 effective date of the agreement for
the College to obtain a federal land patent for the subject site, with the opportunity for a
one-time six-month extension. When the patent was not obtained within the initial 18
months, a six-month extension was granted by the City Council on September 2, 2009.

When it became apparent that land patent would not be obtained within the six-month
period granted by the extension, an amendment to the original development agreement
was approved on February 3, 2010 to allow for an unlimited number of six-month
extensions provided that each was approved by the City Council. A six-month extension
was approved concurrently with the amended development agreement and a new
expiration date of August 3, 2010 was established.

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page Two
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

On March 3, 2010, a 24-month development report was reviewed and approved by the
City Council as required by Section 11.01 of the development agreement. Upon
submittal of the second report in early 2012, it was discovered that the College had not
yet obtained the required land patent and there had been no subsequent six-month
extensions of time requested since August of 2010. Since the land patents had not been
obtained and there were no additional extensions of time requests submitted, the
College was deemed to be in noncompliance with the terms of the agreement per the
provisions outlined in Section 2.07 and therefore the agreement was expired.

Due the expiration of the agreement, CSN and the city of Las Vegas renegotiated a new
development agreement for a mixed-use college campus, which was to include
complimentary commercial and residential facilities in addition to typical academic
functions. The City Council approved the new development agreement on May 1, 2013.

Subsequent to the 2013 approval, CSN has determined that the needs of the College
have changed, and requested that a new agreement be negotiated that will allow for a
more traditional, commuter based campus. The mixed-use urban village concept that
was envisioned with the prior agreement is no longer being considered. This change
will allow the development of the campus with associated commercial uses, but without
a residential component as originally planned. CSN has stated their intent to provide a
world-class, state-of-the art learning facility in an accessible campus environment.

Development Agreement Statutory Requirements

Nevada Revised Statues (NRS) Section 278.0201 governs the content of Development
Agreements. The following analysis demonstrates the proposed development
agreements compliance with the minimum standards as required by NRS.

1. Description of the Land.

The legal description of the land being utilized by CSN for the proposed campus
is defined in Exhibit A of the development agreement.

2. Duration of the Agreement.

Per Section 12.01, the agreement commences on the effective date and
terminates in 30 years unless extended or terminated pursuant to the terms of
the agreement.

3. Specifying what events will constitute breach of the agreement.

The expectations for both parties are located within Section 11 of the
development agreement.

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page Three
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. Providing periods during which any breach may be cured.

Section 11 outlines the dispute resolution criteria and process.


In addition to the minimum required content, NRS 278.0201 also specifies content that
may be included with a development agreement. The following analysis demonstrates
the agreements compliance with the optional categories outlined by NRS.

5. Permitted Uses of Land


The list of permitted uses is attached as Exhibit B and includes a mix of
commercial and civic uses.

6. Density/Intensity of Use

Section 3.03 of the Development Agreement lists the maximum commercial


square footage and maximum educational square footage allowed for the site.
The maximum the maximum amount of commercial square footage is 475,000
square feet, and there is no limit for educational uses. The section refers to
Exhibit B, which delineates permitted uses, and lists uses that are specifically
prohibited.

7. Maximum Height and Size of Proposed Buildings

The maximum building heights and building size are governed by the College of
Southern Nevada Northwest Campus Design Standards, which is included as
Exhibit C of the development agreement.

8. Any Provisions for the Dedication of any Portion of the Land for Public Use

Section Five addresses public facilities. There is no requirement in this


agreement for the College to provide any land for public use. Section 7 outlines
CSNs responsibility regarding Montecito Parkway and the Regional
Transportation Commission.

9. The protection of environmentally sensitive lands.

This requirement is not applicable to the agreement.

10. The preservation and restoration of historic structures.

This requirement is not applicable to the agreement.

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page Four
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

11. The phasing or timing of construction or development on the land, including,


without limitation, the dates on which all or any part of the construction or
development must commence and be completed, and the terms on which any
deadline may be extended.

Section 3.02 outlines the time for construction and completion of the site.
Construction of one educational building will commence within eight years from
the transfer of the site from the United States of America. No timeline is given
regarding the overall completion date, other than to acknowledge that the build
out will take many years and is subject to a variety of factors, including funding.

12. The conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements for infrastructure on the land
and the financing of the public infrastructure by a person having a legal or
equitable interest in the land.

Section 4 (Maintenance), 5 (Public Facilities), 6 (Open Space and Parks), 7


(Transportation), 8 (Flood Control), 9 (Sanitation) and 10 (Water) outline the
infrastructure requirements for both parties.

13. The conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements for annexation of land by the
city or county and the phasing or timing of annexation by the city or county.

This requirement is not applicable to the agreement.

14. The conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements relating to the intent of the
governing body to include the land in an improvement district created pursuant
to chapter 271 of NRS.

This requirement is not applicable to the agreement.

Proposed College of Southern Nevada Development Agreement

The proposed Development agreement is generally consistent with the provisions of the
previously approved document; however, the list below identifies the notable revisions
negotiated with the proposed agreement.

Section 3 Planning and Development of the Site


3.1 The section no longer contemplates residential on the site, and specifies
that commercial, for-profit activities may be carried out along with non-profit
activities.

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page Five
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

3.2 States that the college shall commence construction of at least one
educational building within eight years of the transfer of the site to CSN from the
BLM. The college also states their intent to obtain funds for the first building with
their CIP budget request at the 2017 session of the State Legislature. The
previous agreement required the construction of an educational building within
five years from the agreement effective date.
3.3 The previous agreement allowed for up to 500 residential units on the
campus. The proposed agreement removes the residential component and
identifies specific uses that are prohibited, including billboards, sexual orientated
businesses, marijuana establishments, gravel pits and cemeteries.
3.7(c) Allows for the review of site development plans as a minor review if the
submitted plans conform to the design guidelines and the conceptual map within
Exhibit C.
3.17 Dictates the provisions regarding the on-site sale and distribution of
alcohol. The College may engage in the sale or service of alcohol; however,
permanent or commercial uses, such as a tavern, are subject to all Title 19
requirements.
3.18 States that the College may propose a pedestrian bridge over Durango
Drive as the campus is built out, and it will apply for the applicable easements at
that time.

Section 5 Public Facilities


5.2 - States that the College police force has jurisdiction for law enforcement on
the site. The College maintains Interlocal agreements with Las Vegas Metro
Police Department, which may provide assistance as needed. Previously, the
College police was controlled by the Las Vegas Metro Police Department.

Section 7 Transportation
7.2(b) - States that the College will construct the remaining portions of Grand
Montecito Parkway in conjunction with the construction of the first building on-
site. In the previous agreement, construction was to commence within 60 days of
obtaining a conveyance of the property from the BLM.
7.2(c & e) - States that the College will construct a five-foot asphalt path at the
back of curb adjacent to the east side of Durango Road from Elkhorn to Oso
Blanca Road in conjunction with the first building. The College will also enter into
an agreement with the RTC for the shared use and maintenance of the existing
private perimeter roadways on the west and south sides of the RTC park and ride
facility.

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page Six
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Section 12 Term
12.1 - The term of the agreement is now 30 years from the effective date of the
document without condition. Previously, it was to expire on its fifth anniversary
unless a building was constructed, where it would then be extended to 30 years.
12.2 The periodic review of the document consists of bi-annual meetings
between representatives from the City and College to determine each partys
compliance with the document. Previously, a report was to be submitted by the
College for review by the City Council. The revised review provisions are
consistent with the requirements of NRS 278.

College of Southern Nevada Northwest Campus Design Standards Manual

The College Of Southern Nevada Northwest Campus Design Standards document,


which is included as Exhibit C, outlines the minimum development standards for the
subject site. These standards, in conjunction with Section Three of the development
agreement, will serve to guide the development of the campus. The development
standards for the site are based on the Town Center Design Standards Manual, so that
the campus will fit seamlessly into the Town Center area. The site will be built in phases
with the goal of creating a sustainable, low energy and low water use development with
a distinct campus feel.

The site plans for the campus, shown on Maps 1 and 2, do not depict the configuration
of the proposed site; however, Section 3.7 of the development agreement requires that
a Site Development Plan Review application be submitted for any development on the
site. Figures 9, 10 and the Map 2 Northwest Campus Site Plan identify the maximum
building heights for the subject site. Depending on the location of the structure, the
maximum permissible height is between seven and 12 stories. The site plan depicted on
Map 2, however, indicates that all proposed buildings will be between two and three
stories in height. All residential adjacency 3 to 1 proximity slopes are required to be
maintained from the residential dwellings adjacent to the west property line.
Architectural standards such as building faade, exterior features, exterior building
materials and exterior colors generally replicate the existing requirements for the Town
Center plan area.

Street standards for the subject site will match the dimensions and landscape standards
specified in the Town Center manual for exterior streets. Exterior street cross sections
that apply to the subject site include the Town Center Parkway Arterial, Town Center
Primary Arterial, and Town Center Frontage Road. The interior campus road network is
not specified, but the standard cross section (Figure 3) for an Interior Campus Road
indicates a 26-foot travel lane, a five-foot amenity zone, and a seven-foot detached
sidewalk.

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page Seven
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The provided site plans do not indicate the location or quantity of parking, but the
preferred parking method indicated is through a multi-user parking structure. As the
mixed-use component of the previous plan is not being incorporated into this
agreement, all future development will be required to meet Title 19 parking
requirements.

There is currently an existing Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) park-and-ride


facility located adjacent to the proposed campus. Section 7.6 of the development
agreement encourages that the school and the RTC enter into a shared parking
agreement to maximize parking opportunities. The mass transit option for students and
employees of the campus will assist in further reducing the campuss parking demand.
The development standards acknowledge that temporary parking areas will be required,
and temporary lots that face the public right of way will required to be screened with
landscaping.

The landscaping of the campus will be held to the standards of outlined in Title
19.10.060E and the Town Center Development Standards. Landscaping is to be a mix
of drought tolerant plants consistent with the SNRPC Regional Plan List and the turf
limitations of Title 19.06 and 19.08. Approved ground covers include Purple Verbena,
Green Dalia, Trailing Yellow Lantana, and Dwarf Coyote Bush. Approved shrubs include
the Texas Sage, Sage, Deer Grass, and Cassia. Four specific 36-inch box trees, the
Rio Grande Ash, Mexican Fan Palm, Chitalpa and Purple Robe Locust, are to be used
in combination throughout the campus and streetscape.

Signage standards for the campus are similar to exiting Town Center standards;
however provisions have been included to increase the quantity and maximum sign
area for monument, wall, and directional signs for the college campus. The standards
prohibit signage that is not allowed per Title 19.06 and the Town Center Development
Standards Manual.

Primary changes to the College of Southern Nevada Northwest Campus Design


Standards

The list below identifies the notable development standard revisions negotiated with the
proposed agreement.

The glazing requirement for ground level walls has been revised. While clear
glazing is no longer required on the ground level, reflective glass is still not
permitted [Section C (1)(b)].
The previous requirement for 60% commercial space along the Elkhorn and
Durango frontages has been removed. Outdoor dining and sidewalk cafs are
still encouraged [Section C (1)(c)].

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page Eight
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

The quantity and maximum sign areas for monument, wall, and directional signs
have been slightly increased [Section C (1)(g)].
Window signs are now required to comply with the standards of Title 19.08.120
[Section C (1)(g)].
The Interior Campus Road cross-section (Figure 3) has been reduced from a
width of 80 to 50 feet.
The Overhead Lighting (Figure 11) and the Decorative Lighting (Figure 12)
details have been revised to indicate a LED fixture
The CSN Northwest Campus Site Plans (Maps 1&2) have been revised so that
the interior campus buildings and street network are not shown, which allows for
design flexibility. A Site Development Plan Review application will be required
for any proposed development.
The CSN Northwest Campus Site Plan (Map 2) building height detail shows a
reduced maximum building height of three-stories from four.
The CSN Northwest Campus Right-of-Way Plan (Map 3) depicting exterior
roadways and bus turnouts have been added to the development standards
manual.

FINDINGS

It has been determined that the proposed development agreement complies with the
minimum standards mandated by NRS 278.0201. Furthermore, the development of the
college campus will have a positive impact by providing educational and employment
opportunities within the Town Center plan area and throughout the northwest portions of
the Las Vegas Valley.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a Directors Report (DIR-26231) for a
02/20/08 Development Agreement between the city of Las Vegas and the
College of Southern Nevada.
The City Council approved a Directors Report (DIR-35636) for a six-
09/02/09 month extension to the Development Agreement between the city of
Las Vegas and the College of Southern Nevada.
The City Council approved a Directors Report (DIR-37018) for a
02/03/10 second six month extension to the Development Agreement between
the city of Las Vegas and the College of Southern Nevada.

FS
DIR-68163 [PRJ-68166]
Staff Report Page Nine
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved Directors Report (DIR-37158) for an
amendment to the Development Agreement between the College of
02/03/10
Southern Nevada and the city of Las Vegas to allow for additional
extensions of time.
The City Council approved the first 24-month development review
03/03/10 report (DIR-37342) between the College of Southern Nevada and the
City of Las Vegas.
The City Council approved a Directors Business item (DIR-48086) for
a development agreement between the City of Las Vegas and the
05/01/13
College of Southern Nevada for a northwest campus. Staff and the
Planning Commission had recommended approval on 03/12/13

FS

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163

DIR-68163
Agenda Item No.: 56.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
TXT-68279 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF
LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request to amend LVMC 19.12 related to the Clinic and
Office, Medical or Dental uses, and to provide for other related matters. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Proposed Amendments and Staff Report
TXT-68279

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TXT-68279 Staff recommends APPROVAL.

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED RJ ONLY

NOTICES MAILED RJ ONLY

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

SG
TXT-68279
Proposed Amendments Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** PROPOSED AMENDMENTS **

1. Title 19.12.010 Table 2 (Permitted Uses) is hereby amended by amending the


following entries:

Additional

U
R-E
R-D
R-1
R-SL
R-CL
R-TH
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-MH
P-O
O
C-1
C-2
C-PB
C-M
M
Information

Clinic S P P P P P page 342

2. Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by amending the description for the Clinic
use as follows:

Clinic

Description: A facility which is occupied and used for the purpose of providing
dental or medical care, and which regularly provides any of those services to
the general public on an emergency basis or without appointment. This use
does not include a hospital or a facility which provides for the overnight care or
overnight stay of patients.

Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:


1. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.

On-site Parking Requirement: One space for each 200 square feet of gross
floor area up to 2,000 square feet, plus one space for each additional 250
square feet.

SG
TXT-68279
Staff Report Page One
February 14, 2017 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to amend LVMC Title 19.12.010 Table 2 and 19.12.070 by adding
Clinic as a use that can be permitted within the O (Office) zoning district by means of a
Special Use Permit. It would also restrict the hours of operation by adding a Minimum
Special Use Permit Requirement.

ANALYSIS

The Clinic use has changed from what it once was. Traditionally, a clinic has been closely
related to a hospital, with heavy traffic in and out of the facilities. In recent years, this has
changed with the emergence of the Quick Care clinic model. These clinics operate
predominantly as medical offices with scheduled appointments and provide a wide variety
of care and testing services for patients. Walk-in and emergency patients are also taken
at many of these facilities; however, these services are usually limited to the patients
serviced by the resident physicians. As a result, the clinic operation is much smaller in
scope and scale than a traditional clinic, with little or no impact on the surrounding
community. Allowing discretion for approval of these types of clinics is appropriate and
compatible with other types of development in the O (Office) zoning district.

FINDINGS

This amendment will accomplish the following:

1. Currently, the Clinic use is not permitted in the O (Office zoning district at all. This
amendment would allow the Clinic use in the O (Office) zoning district via approval
of a Special Use Permit.
2. The hours of operation for a Clinic that is located in the O (Office) zoning district
would be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. by a Minimum Special Use
Permit Requirement. A Waiver of this requirement could be requested and
approved at the discretion of the Planning Commission and/or City Council.

SG
Agenda Item No.: 57.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
TXT-68323 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF
LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request to remove all references to the Montecito Town
Center Development Agreement, which expires on April 7, 2017, to amend the Town Center
Development Standards Manual to incorporate the standards of the area covered by the
Development Agreement as a Town Center Land Use District and to provide for other related
matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:


Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Abeyance Request Letter
2. Proposed Amendments and Staff Report
TXT-68323

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

** STAFF REQUESTS THIS ITEM BE HELD IN ABEYANCE TO THE


MARCH 14, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING **
Agenda Item No.: 58.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO

SUBJECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE
AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED
FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE
SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

You might also like