Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03 17 27 14modal1 PDF
03 17 27 14modal1 PDF
03 17 27 14modal1 PDF
VERBS
1.
He wrote it himself.
He must have wri=en it himself.
unmodalized sentence: speaker commi=ed to
the factuality of the proposiFon
modalized: speakers commitment is qualied,
proposiFon is inferred
unmodalized sentence: stronger claim
knowledge by deducFon is weaker than
knowledge by direct experience
Morpho-syntacFc properFes shared
with auxiliaries have, be
qNICE properFes:
NegaFon without DO support
Inversion in interrog. Ss
Codas: I can come and so can Bill.
Emphasis without DO support: You shall have
the money by tomorrow.
qno event structure, do not assign theta-role
modals: under InecFon
have, be VP -> Tense
DO: Last Resort
modals
incompaFble with non-nite forms (to, be-ing,
have-en)
incompaFble with agreement (3rd sg)
short inniFve complement
no passive
no imperaFve
cannot cooccur
modals + past tense:
She could play the piano as a child.
past tense only in indirect speech:
The boss said she might leave immediately.
no past tense:
The boss said she must leave immediately.
epistemic: speakers a[tude to the truth-
value, factual status of the proposiFon
(proposiFonal modality)
root: non-actualized, potenFal events (event
modality)
(Palmer)
epistemic < Gk. knowledge
belief-sets of the speaker, the speakers mental
representaFon of reality
inferenFal processes
meta-representaFon of reality
qualicaFons concerning the speakers
knowledge: inference, assumpFon, speculaFon,
deducFon
epistemic modality = speaker-oriented
c. ?If John must have a high IQ, then his teachers should treat
him carefully.
d. ?If that blonde may be Jacks wife, we should keep quiet
about the secretary.
vs. deonFc:
e. If John must leave, then I will go too.
f. If money may rule, then there is no jusFce.
semanFc vs. pragmaFc strength
not [Modal]
possibility: can, could,
root dare
root may, might
need
The scope of the perfect