This document provides an evaluation checklist for reviewing a standards-based WebQuest lesson with a colleague. The checklist evaluates whether the lesson's learning goals are based on content standards, the design pattern is appropriate, it is inquiry-based and real-world, and the process and evaluation align with the goals and standards. It also evaluates if resources, student learning methods, and opportunities to extend learning are included.
This document provides an evaluation checklist for reviewing a standards-based WebQuest lesson with a colleague. The checklist evaluates whether the lesson's learning goals are based on content standards, the design pattern is appropriate, it is inquiry-based and real-world, and the process and evaluation align with the goals and standards. It also evaluates if resources, student learning methods, and opportunities to extend learning are included.
This document provides an evaluation checklist for reviewing a standards-based WebQuest lesson with a colleague. The checklist evaluates whether the lesson's learning goals are based on content standards, the design pattern is appropriate, it is inquiry-based and real-world, and the process and evaluation align with the goals and standards. It also evaluates if resources, student learning methods, and opportunities to extend learning are included.
Directions: Use the evaluation checklist to discuss your standards-based WebQuest
lesson with a colleague. Lesson Component Yes/No Feedback The learning goal(s) is based on an appropriate content standard(s). The WebQuest Design Pattern is appropriate for the learning goal. The lesson is inquiry-based and set in a real-world context. The process clearly provides a detailed explanation of how students will participate their learning. The process includes appropriate teacher reviewed resources will be provided. The process includes methods intended to contribute to student learning such as: graphic organizers, academic vocabulary, tips for success, metacognitive strategies, opportunities for talk/collaborate, formative monitoring and/or differentiated activities. The success criteria in the evaluation aligns to the learning target, task and process? The conclusion includes content and/or procedural reminders. The conclusion includes opportunities to extend student learning by providing additional resources for those students who want to learn more about the content.