Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nigel Omar Smith, A210 178 324 (BIA Feb. 15, 2017)
Nigel Omar Smith, A210 178 324 (BIA Feb. 15, 2017)
Nigel Omar Smith, A210 178 324 (BIA Feb. 15, 2017)
Department of Justice
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,
DOYUtL c t1JVL)
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Grant, Edward R.
Cite as: Nigel Omar Smith, A210 178 324 (BIA Feb. 15, 2017)
U.S. Department of Justice
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision in the above-referenced case. This copy is being
provided to you as a courtesy. Your attorney or representative has been served with this
decision pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 1292.5(a). If the attached decision orders that you be
removed from the United States or affirms an Immigration Judge's decision ordering that you
be removed, any petition for review of the attached decision must be filed with and received
by the appropriate court of appeals within 30 days of the date of the decision.
Sincerely,
boYutL {!{1/\A)
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Grant, Edward R.
Userteam: i :
Cite as: Nigel Omar Smith, A210 178 324 (BIA Feb. 15, 2017)
a - -- .. ... .&.J .S::{l!iF/Y_ J} 1.4&
., ....
-f .
U.S: Department of Justice Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Executive Office for Immigration Review
APPEAL
CHARGE:
APPLICATION: Termination
The respondent, a native and citizen of Jamaica, and a lawful permanent resident of the United
States since April 14, 2014, has filed a timely appeal of an Immigration Judge's order entered on
October 25, 2016, ordering his removal to Jamaica. The record will be remanded to the
Immigration Court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
In a brief decision entered on October 25, 2016, the Immigration Judge determined that as the
respondent had not provided evidence as to having timely filed his applications for the requested
relief from removal by October 21, 2016, the respondent had abandoned his opportunity to file for
that relief, as requested. However, even though the Immigration Judge states that the issue of the
respondent's removability had been resolved previously, referring to a determination he had made
at the hearing that took place on August 3, 2016 (Tr. at 34), the decision is devoid of any legal
analysis in support of that determination, and is insufficient to meet his obligations under the
regulations. See e.g., 8 C.F.R. 1003.37 and 1240.12.
The Immigration Judge's decision, as presently constituted, does not provide us with a
meaningful basis for appellate review. 1 See generally Matter ofS-H-, 23 I&N Dec. 462, 463-65
1
The Immigration Judge's explanation of the reasons contained in the transcript (Tr. at 34,
39-40) is not sufficient pursuant to our decision in Matter of A-P-, 22 I&N Dec. 468 (BIA
1999),which requires that the record include a complete decision of the Immigration Judge in a
manner that clearly separates it from the transcript of the proceedings. Id at 476 (finding that the
appellate process is best served when the oral decision is set apart from the transcript of the
proceedings such that it is readily identifiable as the Immigration Judge's complete decision).
Furthermore, the record reflects the Immigration Judge at the August 3, 2016, hearing, expressly
denied the respondent's request for a written decision outlining the legal basis and reasons for his
..
removability findings (Tr. at 39).
Cite as: Nigel Omar Smith, A210 178 324 (BIA Feb. 15, 2017)
/. A2IO t78 324
(BIA 2002) (stating that Immigration Judges should include in their decisions clear and complete
findings of fact that are supported by the record and are in compliance with controlling law).
Consequently, we find it appropriate to remand the record to the Immigration Judge for
preparation of a full decision in support of his legal conclusions as to the respondent's
removability.
2
Cite as: Nigel Omar Smith, A210 178 324 (BIA Feb. 15, 2017)
., ...
(
I
.
#'
_X_ ATTACHED IS A COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE. THIS DECISION
IS FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED WITH THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS
WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF THIS WRITTEN DECISION.
SEE THE ENCLOSED FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPERLY PREPARING YOUR APPEAL.
YOUR NOTICE OF APPEAL, ATTACHEDDOCUMENTS, AND FEE OR FEE WAIVER REQUEST
MOST BE MAILED TO:
ATTACHED IS l.. COPY OF THE DECISIOl OF 'l'IIE HUHGRA'!'Iml JUDGE AS THE RESULT
OF YOUR FAILURE TO l\PPEAR AT YOUR SCHEDULED DEPORTATim1 OR REHOVAL HEARH1G.
THIS DECISiml IS FHU\L UNLESS A 90TI0N 'l'O REOP:Sl IS FILED Hl ACCORDAJCE
WITH SEC'PION 242B(e) (3) OF THE H4tHGIU'-.Timl Am NATimlALITY ACT, 8 u.s.c.
SECTION 122B {e) (3) Hl DEPORATIOH PR:OCSSDrncs OR 8SCTiml 240 (c) (6),
8 u.s.c. SECTI0t1 1229a(e) (6) rn RE40VAL PROCEEDH1GS. IF YOU FILE 17\ MOTIQ},l
TO REOPEl, YOUR MO'.FION MUS'.F BE FILSD WITH THIS COURT:
H4MIGRATiml COURT
121 RED SCHOOLHOUSE ROAD
FISHKILL, 1 122 4
AL DO
_ _E__
AP
_1L OTHER __ P __ NOV
E _DA__ TE_ _:__ __ _6
2_ 1
2_ 5_ ,_ 0 _ ._ ______________
COURT CLERK
IMMIGRATION COURT ox
CC: OHS LITIGATION UNIT
RYANNE KONAN ESQ
'., I'
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
IMMIGRATION COURT
Downstate Correctional Facility
121 Red Schoolhouse Road
Fishkill NY 12524
-
R
Immigration Judge '
Dated: Oct 25, 2016
APPEAL DUE DATE: Nov 25, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
THIS DOCUMENT WAS SERVED BY: MAIL (M) PERSONNEL SERVICE (P)
TO: [M] ALIEN [ ] ALIEN c/o Custodial Officer [M] ALIEN's ATT/REP [M] OHS
DATE: 10/25/16 BY: COURT STAFF CLL
Attachments: [ ] EOIR -33 [ ] EOIR-28 [ ] Legal Services List [X] Other -
EOIR-26 Appeal Packet