Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2016 Annual Report
2016 Annual Report
2016 Annual Report
Group revenue Adjusted profit before tax** Dividends per share Operating profit
13.4bn
Actual: +5% Constant currency: +4%
1,071m
Up 5%
36.75p
Up 5%
1,103m
Up 18%
Adjusted operating profit* Adjusted earnings Gross investment Profit before tax
315m 103.4p
Up 55%
* Before amortisation of non-operating intangibles, profits less losses on disposal of non-current assets and exceptional items.
** Before amortisation of non-operating intangibles, profits less losses on disposal of non-current assets, profits less losses on sale and closure of businesses
and exceptional items.
1
Strategic report
2016
OUR YEAR IN REVIEW
A year of progress for all of our businesses with
a substantial expansion in Primarks selling space,
increased margins in all of our food businesses and
fundamental structural changes at AB Sugar.
12 GROCERY 32 INGREDIENTS
20 SUGAR 36 RETAIL
26 AGRICULTURE
Front cover image: Sugar cane
Above: Dorset Cereals
International Europe
Image: Central Madrid
Celebrating 10years in Spain Twinings and Ovaltine are our Our UK beet sugar factories typically
Operating review, Retail 36 globalhot beverage brands. produce well over one million tonnes
of sugar annually. Azucarera in Spain
Europe produces over 400,000 tonnes
Silver Spoon and Billingtons sugars, ofbeet sugar each year and has a
Jordans and Dorset cereals, Ryvita, cane refining capacity of a further
Kingsmill, Pataks and Blue Dragon. 400,000 tonnes.
Strategic report
1,084m 2015: 1,211m 1,294m 2015: 1,247m 5,949m 2015: 5,347m
Adjusted operating profit Adjusted operating profit Adjusted operating profit
CHAIRMANS STATEMENT
Strategic report
of our store designers making Primark As noted in the Remuneration report I am pleased to report that a final
anattractive and fun place to shop. lastyear, we have undertaken a dividend of 26.45p is proposed, to be
complete review of the groups incentive paid on 13 January 2017 to shareholders
Corporate responsibility arrangements during the course of this on the register on 16 December 2016.
Having provided an update on corporate year and a number of changes are Together with the interim dividend
responsibility in each of the last two proposed to improve alignment with of10.3p paid on 1 July 2016, this will
years we have, today, published a full shareholder interests. makea total of 36.75p for the year,
report for this year. The priorities of our anincrease of 5%.
businesses remain largely unchanged The board
with a continued challenge to reduce the Tim Clarke and Javier Ferrn have Outlook
environmental footprint of our operations eachcompleted more than nine years We expect the expansion of Primarks
and improve the safety of our sites. service as directors of the Company and, selling space to continue inall of its
Weremain committed to being a in accordance with the UK Corporate major markets. AB Sugar will benefit
goodneighbour and supporting the Governance Code, the rest of the board substantially from this years increase
communities where we operate. For must now confirm their independence insugar prices and from reductions
thefirst time, we have sought to quantify annually. This having been done, we initscost base. Grocery, Ingredients
our social impact in order toshow the aredelighted that both Tim and Javier andAgriculture are expectedto make
benefits of our collective endeavour haveagreed to continue as members furtherprogress.
onthe lives of our people, suppliers, ofthe board and Tim will continue as
neighbours and customers. Acopy of theSenior Independent Director. Assuming a continuation of current
the report is available fordownload at exchange rates, and following the
www.abf.co.uk/responsibility. Peter Smith retired as a non-executive significant devaluation of sterling,
director of the Company in April having weexpect group earnings to benefit
served nine years as a member of the from the translation of overseas profits.
board. I would like to thank Peter for the However, as Primark buys much of its
significant contribution he made during merchandise in US dollars and sells
The fifth consecutive his tenure as a director and chairman inthe UK in sterling, there will be an
ofthe Audit committee. adverse effect, intheyear, on its
year of operating UKmargins.
In April we welcomed Richard Reid to
cash generated in the board as a non-executive director Taking all of these factors into account,
excess of 1bn. and chairman of the Audit committee.
Richard was formerly a partner at
at this early stage, we expect progress
inadjusted operating profit and adjusted
KPMGLLP, having joined the firm in earnings for the group for the coming year.
1980. From 2008 he served as London
Chairman until he retired from the firm
inSeptember 2015.
Charles Sinclair
Employees Chairman
Whenever I visit our operations around
the world I am regularly reminded of the
enthusiasm with which our employees
undertake their responsibilities, their
commitment to improving performance
and their willingness to embrace
change.I would like to thank them for
their achievements this year which
contributed greatly to the groups
continuing success.
www.abf.co.uk/responsibility
Strategic report
OUR BROAD GEOGRAPHICAL FOOTPRINT
Please note, the above map correctly reflects the groups countries of operation and has been amended from that
shown in the printed version of the Annual Report that was distributed to shareholders, which included a printing error.
achallenging year for clothing retailers The referendum on the UKs continued
with market value declines seen in membership of the EU has created
mostcountries in Europe. It is therefore some short-term uncertainties including
atestament to the strength of Primarks With the diversity of a decline in the value of sterling.
customer offering that it increased its
share in all of its major markets. The our operations, our However, changes in legislation and
trade agreements, particularly in the
devaluation of the euro against the US
dollar in 2015 put pressure on margins
broad geographical areas of trade tariffs and UK agricultural
policy have the potential to benefit the
inthis financial year and sterlings recent
devaluation against the US dollar will
footprint and a strong group, and the current level of sterling
offers UK food producers significant
havean impact in the coming year. balance sheet, we opportunities to replace imported
Primarks commitment to maintaining food and build export markets. We are
itsleadership position in the value are well placed to therefore engaging with a number of
sectorof the clothing market has
beenour priority and I am pleased take advantage UK Government departments to ensure
that the full range of opportunities and
withthe efforts of our buyers to
significantly limitthe profit impact of
ofthe opportunity risks, as they affect ABF, are recognised.
OF FOOD, INGREDIENTS
AND RETAIL BUSINESSES
We sell into more than 100 Our range of activities is broad The corporate centre agrees
countries worldwide with inproduct, technology and market strategy and budgets with the
scope.Our businesses comprise businesses and monitors their
operations in 50 countries
sizeable operations that achieve good performance closely.
across Europe, southern revenueand profit growth; mature,
Africa, the Americas, cash-generative operations; and
AsiaandAustralia. smallerenterprises that afford
excitinggrowth potential.
06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Strategic report
BUSINESS STRUCTURE The group is managed as five business
segments that bring together common
industry expertise, operational capability
entrepreneurial flair. The centre is small
and uses short lines of communication
to ensure prompt, incisive and
and market intelligence. Operational unambiguous decision-making. It seeks
decisions are made locally because, in to ensure that business activities are
ourexperience, they are most successful appropriately monitored andsupported.
when made by the people who have
thebest understanding of their markets
and who have to implement them.
Thecorporate centre aims to provide a
framework in which our business leaders
have the freedom and decision-making
authority to pursue opportunities with
Operating review 12
Business strategies 10
BUSINESS STRATEGIES
Strategic report
AGRICULTURE INGREDIENTS
RETAIL
agricultural businesses operating dedicated to understanding the key
across the entire food supply chain. requirements of their customers
Ithas a detailed understanding andtheir end-use markets in order
ofagricultures importance in our toensure a relevant supply of
changing world and the ambition ingredients, systems, products
todrive ever greater production andtechnology that create
efficiency has been the core philosophy value.They develop partnership
for over 30 years. AB Agri operates relationships withcustomers to
through individual, entrepreneurial achieve a genuine understanding
businesses empowered to grow their oftheir products, formulations,
interests independently, and through equipment and processes and the Operating review, Retail 36
astrong network of contacts across market environment in which the
the entire supply chain. products are sold. They aim to grow
by providing outstanding customer Primark offers great value for money
Organic growth is achieved through service backed by a high level of which it achieves by: incurring no
innovative product development and by investment in technology, innovation, advertising costs, instead relying
extending the business already broad research and development. onits customers doing the talking
geographic reach into new territories about its products; buying in vast
and new areas adjacent to its core Each business has its own business quantities and passing on the cost
capabilities. Using the diverse breadth model that determines an appropriate savings tocustomers; keeping
of products, services and people within balance of emphasis across the overheads toaminimum but
the AB Agri community, the business fullrange of potential sources of investingin state-of-the-art logistics
develops bespoke solutions tailored competitive advantage: innovative toenable its stores to replenish stocks
toits customers needs. AB Agri anddistinctive products; an efficient quickly;and by not compromising
willcontinue its successful strategy and proprietary set of production itshigh-quality standards, rigorously
ofseeking to make complementary processes; and compelling customer testing products at the various
acquisitions to strengthen its portfolio propositions comprising a blend of stagesof production.
of businesses and its technical capability. product performance and customer
It will also continue to collaborate with specific services. In the world of fashion it is critical
other businesses inthe ABF groupto thatonce a style is seen on the
harness new contacts and technologies. fashion show catwalk it reaches
thestores asquickly as possible.
Itcan take as little as six weeks
frominitial design concept to being
available onshelf, and merchandise is
sourcedfrom allcorners of the globe.
Although Primark does not own the
companies or factories that produce
its merchandise, it recognises its
responsibility to the workers in those
factories, and to its customers, to
ensure that its products are made
ingood working conditions.
GROCERY
INTERNATIONALISATION RESPONDING TO
OF OUR GREAT CONSUMER DEMAND
BRITISH BRANDS Gluten-free bread that people
want to eat.
18 15
19 16
GLOBAL FLAVOURS
Associated British Foods plc Annual Report and Accounts 2016
14
GROCERY
ENJOYED BY PEOPLE ALL OVER Jordans and Ryvita has now delivered
theexpected savings in operations,
3,274m
2015: 3,177m
9.3%
2015: 9.0%
(Linking Environment and Farming)
andthe Wildlife Trust to improve
sustainability and biodiversity on the
farms of our oatsuppliers, has received
widespread recognition within the
Actual fx: +3% industry. Ryvitalost crispbread sales in
Constant fx: +2% avery competitive UK market although
its relaunch this year and a new portion
pack format has slowed the rate
Adjusted operating profit Return on average capital employed
ofdecline.
304m
2015: 285m
24.2%
2015: 22.5%
Revenues at AB World Foods were level
with last year. Pataks and Blue Dragon
achieved growth in their important
markets of Canada and the UK where
Actual fx: +7% both brands strengthened their market
Constant fx: +4% leading positions, but Pataks faced
amore challenging competitive
environment in Australia. Westmill had
agood year across most segments
witha particularly strong performance
innoodles where Lucky Boat achieved
good growth. Spices and microwaveable
rice both delivered volume and value
growth but the proliferation of low cost
Adjusted operating profit increased now have widergeographic distribution basmati rice brands put pressure on
by 7% with a further improvement in achieving particular success in Germany. sales and margin of our products.
margin. Revenues were also ahead,
including the benefit of a 53rd week Revenues at Allied Bakeries were Operating profit for our grocery
but were again held back by aheadthis year driven by a substantial businesses in North America was
commodity price deflation. increase in Kingsmill volumes. A aheadof last year. Stratas Foods, our
furtherstrengthening of relationships commodity oils joint venture, performed
Twinings Ovaltine had another good with majorcustomers saw the business strongly. At ACH, Mazola oil revenues
yearled by Twinings in Australia and the winThe Grocer magazines supplier were marginally below last year despite
US and a return to growth for Ovaltine ofthe year award for the second year distribution gains, as pricing remained
inThailand. Continued support for the running. Our premium brands, Allinson under pressure from competing
brand through television, digital and and Burgen, also performed well with vegetable oils which had a raw material
printadvertising drove a further increase notable success for Allinson Seeded cost advantage throughout the year.
in Twinings UK value market share andSeeded Wholemeal variants. The Mexicos results were disappointing as
following the brands relaunch last year. continued growth of Kingsmill Sandwich unfavourable exchange rate movements
Twinings is the clear market leader in Thins led to investment in a second and competitor pricing pressure reduced
Australia, where the breakfast range production line which came on stream volumes and margin. Since the year
wasrelaunched during the year, and inthe Stockport bakery in April, providing endwe have reached agreement to
thesuccessful Tealand television a platform for further innovation. sellACHs North American herbs and
advertising campaign, which has driven spices business including the Tones,
further growth in Italy, has recently Silver Spoon gained new contracts and Spice Islands and Durkee brands, the
beenrolled out in France and Japan. benefited from a relaunch this summer, licence for Weber seasonings, and a
Sales ofOvaltine in Thailand increased but low retail sugar prices maintained manufacturing facility in Ankeny, Iowa.
and, with less sold on promotion, there pressure on margins. Wider distribution The transaction has now received
was also some margin improvement. and a targeted home-baking marketing clearance from the anti-trust authorities
Brand extensions drove growth in campaign drove an increase in and completion, with a cash consideration
Switzerland and some of these lines Billingtons revenues, and Allinson of $365m, is expected in mid-November.
Butter Chickens halo effect on our other popular flavours has helped
our entire sauces and pastes range grow at twice the market rate.
With its health and premium quality credentials, Burgen was selected
as the brand to launch our new offering and, in April 2013, it became
thefirst mainstream bakery brand to introduce a gluten-free bakery
product in Australia. Within six months it had achieved a 35% value
share in Australias largest grocery retailer, delivering incremental
volume for Tip Top and the bakery category as a whole. With this
earlysuccess, a dedicated gluten-free production line was built in
Ermington,asuburb of Sydney.
A new product has now been developed for the Abbotts Village
Bakeryrange with a unique formulation and baking process that
delivera gluten-free loaf so close to regular bread that consumers
cant believe its gluten free.
In 2009 In 2012
696
new gluten-free
1,199
gluten-free products
products were were launched,
launched 16% being bread
in Australia and bread-based
Source: Mintel
GROCERY
A fantastical story which drawson Incredible sights greet her at every turn:
CASE Alices Adventures in Wonderland elegant couples sip tea at candlelit tables
STUDY
suspended from an enormous tree; time
A young woman in black walks alone, goes backwards as a man on stilts, a
alongadark and foggy London street. ball-gowned woman on a swing and another,
Spotting awhite rabbit in a red silk reclining on a white grand piano, whirl
collarshefollows it, intrigued, as it around her. And then a handsome conjuror
hopstowards a plain greydoor. tosses a deck of Twinings sachets into
theair that change into butterflies, then
The door opens inwards. A smiling man intoapeerless cup of tea
inafrock coat and striped trousers,
withextravagant lace collars and ruff Enchanting consumers
andasilver-topped cane, raises his This fantastical story which draws
tophatand welcomes her to an onAlices Adventures in Wonderland
extraordinary teaparty. iscaptured in our Twinings Tealand
commercial. The advertisement, which
reflects our strategy of showing how the
premium brand can unlock a magical world
of sensory experience, was first aired in
2014in Italy and parts of Japan with
GROCERY
Mexico
Blue Dragons sales grew by
CASE 43% in 2015/16
STUDY
OUR GREAT BRITISH BRANDS inwholesome cereals with a repeat purchase rate of over 40%.
Asmall but growing Dorset Cereals business has recently been
established, managed by the same team.
A number of our well known UK brands have wide international
appeal and have built up substantial export portfolios, mainly
Blue Dragon
through third-party distributors. To open up new markets and
In 2012, AB World Foods conducted a study to identify which
accelerate the rate of growth we have sought to capitalise on the
markets around the world offered the best long-term opportunities
local knowledge, experience and office support infrastructure
for its world-cuisine products. Criteria for the study included GDP
ofthe groups existing operations in a number of these markets.
growth, levels of consumer spend, sophistication of the grocery
market, population growth and urbanisation, consumer influences
Jordans and Dorset Cereals
and lifestyles. However, a key factor was the extent to which
We already sell almost as much Jordans cereal internationally
thegroup already had experience and assets in each market.
aswe do in the UK, with distribution in over 60 countries. In the
Mexicoand Brazil were identified as affording the most potential.
largest of these export markets, Australia, France and Canada,
wehave now established overseas sales and marketing offices.
Our operation in Mexico leverages the existing ABF presence in
thecountry through ACH. Products are sold by the ACH sales team
Assisted by George Weston Foods in Australia, we launched
alongside other ACH consumer brands such as Capullo and Mazola
Jordans into the Australian market in 2013, where it is now eaten
oils, while a dedicated Blue Dragon marketing team manages the
inover 10% of households and, shortly after its acquisition in 2015,
brand. The range has expanded from 7 to 11 products and is centred
the Dorset Cereals brand was launched in Australia where it can
on stir-fry meals and oriental condiments. Sales grew by 46%
now be bought in over 1,700 supermarket stores. Dorset Cereals
in2014/15 and by a further 43% in the current year.
are now sold in over 45 countries.
In Brazil, as in Mexico, we used a hosting model, leveraging
Jordans has been sold in France since 1992 and has been distributed
ABFsinternational presence and existing structure, but this time
bythelocal Twinings Ovaltine operation since we acquired the
withAB Mauri. AB World Foods has a dedicated in-country
brandin2009. It is now the countrys second largest cereal brand,
resourcebased in Sao Paulo, supported by AB Mauris sales
with12% of the adult cereals market.
andfinance teams.
12%
of the adult
10%
of households regularly
45 countries
cereals market eat Jordans products
SUGAR
SHARING
IDEAS
24 23
SUGAR
1,798m
2015: 1,818m
1.9%
2015: 1.8%
The end of the EU sugar regime in
October 2017 represents an opportunity
for British Sugar to increase its sugar
production and it is working with growers
Actual fx: -1% to restore beet supplies to more normal
Constant fx: +5% levels in 2017/18. This is the first crop
forwhich growers will be able to choose
between one and three-year deals,
Adjusted operating profit Return on average capital employed
bothof which will have bonuses linked
34m 2.1%
tothe sugar sales price. This is designed
to strengthen the partnership with our
farmers and underpin British Sugars
competitive position.
2015: 33m 2015: 1.9%
Actual fx: +3% During the year, British Sugar completed
Constant fx: +55% a 15m investment in an anaerobic
digestion plant at the Bury St Edmunds
factory. This new facility will consume
some 100,000 tonnes of pressed sugar
beet pulp as a feedstock and will
generate five megawatts of electricity
for export to the national grid. This
investment will reduce our carbon
emissions and our energy consumption
Our reported revenue and adjusted driven by increasing populations and by avoiding the need to dry the pulp
operating profit for AB Sugar for the rising incomes and, with AB Sugars andby eliminating the transportation
period were in line with last year, strong track record of commercial ofitfor animal feed.
andsubstantially ahead at constant development and delivery of
currency as a result of the weakness performance improvement, full In Spain, the operating result improved
of the African currencies. ownership will accelerate Illovos significantly with the benefit of lower
progress. In order to align Illovos beet costs, higher beet sugar production
A reduction in EU stock levels and an financial year endmore closely with that and better pricing. Total production for
increase in world sugar prices resulted of the group, Illovos results will now be the year is estimated to be 474,000
ina strengthening of European sugar consolidated for the year to 31 August. tonnes of which 449,000 tonnes was
prices. This benefited our Spanish These results therefore include Illovos from beet and 25,000 tonnes was
business in the year but, with most of revenue and profit for an 11 month fromraw sugars co-refined in the
British Sugars contracts agreed on an period. They also reflect a change in beetfactories in the north.
annual basis, no material impact on its accounting policy for the valuation of
results from the improvement in pricing Illovos sugar cane roots in line with an Beet sugar in north China made a
will be seen until the 2016/17 financial amendment to IAS 41 which now smallprofit with the benefit of increased
year. All of our sugar businesses permits the valuation of suchassets at production to 159,000 tonnes and record
delivered substantial cost reductions cost less accumulated depreciation. The operating performances at both factories.
again this year through a combination cane roots adjustment had the effect In the south, our cane sugar factories
ofcontinuous improvement, business of reducing adjusted operating profit by operated at a much lower level than last
transformation, capital expenditure 8m this year, with a restatement of year and sugar production reduced to
andprocurement activities. the adjusted operating profit for 2015 284,000 tonnes mainly as a result of
to reduce it by10m. poor sugar content. On 12 September
In June, we completed the buyout of the we reached agreement to sell our
minority interests in Illovo Sugar Limited UK sugar production for the 2015/16 canesugar business in south China to
for a purchase consideration of 247m. yearwas just short of 1.0 million tonnes, aconsortium led by Nanning Sugar, a
Africa is a growth market for sugar, as planned, with a return to more typical leading producer in the region which has
6,500
employees and their
A MAJOR
CONTRIBUTOR
regional African markets, employing
anextensive network of distribution
andlogistics channels. The groups
continuing strategy ofsecuring
increasing growth opportunities,
family members
TO AFRICAN inlocaland regional sugaroutlets,
reducesits exposure tolower-priced
Refined sugar production
capacity doubled in Zambia to DEVELOPMENT EUmarkets. This is evidenced by
thisyears commissioning ofZambia
100,000
Sugarsmost recent expansion project
The Illovo group operates in six countries which more than doubles annual
insouthern Africa. It is the continents refinedsugar production capacity
largest sugar producer and a significant toaround 100,000 tonnes.
tonnes following manufacturer of downstream products.
As a major private investor in Africa,
recent expansion Illovo owns 270 square miles of agricultural Illovooperates and markets its products
land under cane which, when combined incountries that face considerable
withthe 703 square miles owned by private challenges in the form of poverty,
growers, yield enough sugar cane to unemployment, inequality and disease
produce upwards of 1.7 million tonnes of the United Nations classifies Malawi,
sugar annually at the groups 11 cane sugar Mozambique, Zambia andTanzania
plants. The group also produces a range asbeing among the worlds least
ofco-products downstream of the sugar developed countries. By providing
making process, including furfural, an significant employment, accommodation,
important renewable chemical feedstock, healthcare, educational assistance and
and ethyl alcohol. The majority of these basic services to rural communities,
co-products are made at plants in thegroup has a significant positive
SouthAfrica and Tanzania and are sold impact on theseeconomies. In an
internationally into high-value niche extensive and independent socio-
markets. Illovos plants also utilise milled economic impact study released in2014,
cane stalks (bagasse) as a bio-renewable it was shown thatIllovo contributed
fuel to co-generate enough electricity an estimated ZAR18.5bn in2012/13 to
tomeet around 90% of their own power African economies, includingdirect,
requirements and, in power-deficit indirect andinduced economic impacts.
countriessuch as Swaziland, they sell
surplus power into the national grid.
SUGAR
CASE
STUDY
AGRICULTURE
FEEDING
SUCCESS
RESPONSIBLY PRODUCED
PROTEIN
Rising to the challenge of an
increasingdemand for protein feed.
30 29
AGRICULTURE
1,084m
2015: 1,211m
5.4%
2015: 5.0%
for further growth inspecialist proteins
for pigs, calves, poultry, fish and pets.
58m 17.7%
newpre-mix feed mill which will provide
an assured source of high-quality feed
and is due to be completed next spring,
will further differentiate our feed
2015: 60m 2015: 19.2% business inChina.
Actual fx: -3%
Constant fx: -6%
AGRICULTURE
CASE
STUDY
EFFICIENCY
AND INNOVATION
IN AGRI-FOOD
PRODUCTION
Associated British Foods plc Annual Report and Accounts 2016
31
INGREDIENTS
FINDING
THE RIGHT
CHEMISTRY
Associated British Foods plc Annual Report and Accounts 2016
33
35 35
INGREDIENTS
1,294m
2015: 1,247m
7.2%
2015: 6.1%
inpharmaceutical and nutraceutical
applications.
93m 13.1%
forpharmaceutical reformulations
and,atPGPI, the cereal crisp
extrusion business continued to
develop, fuelledbythe consumer
2015: 76m 2015: 11.1% trend for healthysnacking.
Actual fx: +22%
Constant fx: +24% Our range of bakery enzymes
was extended during the year with
a number of new product launches
including a newglucose oxidase enzyme
for the bakery sector. Increased sales
into the detergent sector were driven
by a focus on the speciality enzymes
segments anda broadening of our
customer base. The food enzyme
Ingredients revenues were 4% ahead We made further progress in China business in South America and Asia
of last year and operating profit was thisyear including the rationalisation was also expanded with a particular
again substantially aheadwith a ofproduction facilities with the closure emphasis on bakery. Expansion of the
further improvement inmargin. ofour old factory site at Harbin. In enzymes plant in Finland is on schedule
therest of Asia good revenue growth for completion next year.
AB Mauri, our bakery ingredients drovehigher profit and further factory
and yeast business, delivered a third optimisation initiatives drove efficiencies
year ofsignificant profit recovery with in manufacturing operations.
The Americas being a major contributor
toits success. In North America, new A key driver of the development
bakery ingredient products targeted of the business has been the recent
atthe faster growing market segments, investment in the US and UK Centres
such as tortillas and flatbreads, were well of Excellence. Opened in November
received. A robust performance inLatin 2015 in response to customer
America, despite continuing economic requests for support in developing
difficulties, was driven byhigher output their products, the UK facility in
from the yeast factoryinVeracruz and Corby, Northamptonshire provides
strong operational execution. an opportunity for customers to
access the latest innovations in
A focus on the development of new bakery development. This mirrors
products to meet changing consumer the successful US bakingHUB
tastes included the creation of organic which was opened in January last
bread ingredient solutions and a range year in St Louis, Missouri. Expansion
of natural ferments and flavours. We also of the bakery ingredients research
successfully introduced new shelf-life and development centre in the
extension products aimed at reducing Netherlands will be completed
food waste in the supply chain. next year.
RETAIL
ALWAYS
PHENOMENAL GROWTH
In a global beauty market
worth over 290bn,
Primarks PS Beauty is
firmly making its mark.
39 40
RETAIL
5,949m
2015: 5,347m
11.6%
2015: 12.6%
itsexceptional value-for-money and
thebreadth of its product range. We
areencouraged by the most recent
openingsin the regional malls at Danbury,
Willow Grove and Freehold Raceway.
Actual fx: +11%
Constant fx: +9%
Adjusted operating profit Return on average capital employed NEW STORE OPENINGS
689m
2015: 673m
30.2%
2015: 31.1%
UK
Banbury
Birmingham Fort
Broughton Park, Chester
Fort Kinnaird
Actual fx: +2% Fosse Park, Leicester
Constant fx: +1% Lancaster
Monks Cross, York
Spain
Gran Via, Madrid
Portugal
Almada Forum, Lisbon
Sales at Primark were 9% ahead of The operating profit margin reduced from France
lastyear at constant currency driven 12.6% to 11.6% driven by the devaluation Cagnes-sur-Mer
by a weighted average increase in of the euro against the US dollar early in La Valette-du-Var
selling space of 9% with a much calendar 2015. Primark buys a substantial Lyon
higher proportion of this years proportion of its garments in US dollars
newstore openings being in the and sells them in euros and sterling and is
Italy
Arese
second half. therefore subject to transactional currency
exposures. Forward currency contracts Germany
Revenue benefited by two percentage are taken out to cover these exposures Leipzig
points from the 53rd week this year. when orders are placed and as a
Unseasonable weather and cautious consequence last years results were The Netherlands
consumer sentiment led to value declines largely unaffected by this devaluation Alkmaar
in the clothing retail sector in some of and the impact was felt throughout this Dordrecht
ourimportant markets, particularly the financial year. A large part of the gross Groningen
UK and Germany. Warm weather in the impact was mitigated by a good buying
pre-Christmas period was followed by performance and also a lower level Austria
avery cold March and April. Like-for-like ofmark-downs as a result of tight Linz
sales were 2% negative overall. The UK stockmanagement. USA
like-for-like performance was in line with Danbury, Connecticut
this but Ireland delivered a strong sales Sterlings weakening against the US dollar, Freehold Raceway, New Jersey
performance throughout the year, Spain, particularly following the EU referendum, King of Prussia, Philadelphia
France and Austria traded well and the had little transactional impact on Primarks Willow Grove, Philadelphia
Netherlands and Germany were less margins in this financial year. However,
affected by cannibalisation as the year at current exchange rates the effect will RELOCATIONS
progressed. Asaresult of the weakening be adverse in the new financial year. UK
of sterling, sales were 11% ahead when Thereaction of UK clothing retailers to Oxford
translated at actual exchange rates. this major movement in exchange rates Grimsby
All our people in Spain are really proud of what weve achieved.
Wehave created an exciting business that tailors its products to
thelocal market and delivers fantastic prices and value, we have
41stores employing more than 5,000 staff and are planning more
openings, were number one in market share, and our learnings
arehelping us grow in other countries. Its been an amazing
journeyandwere not finished yet.
We have
41
stores in Spain
5,000
staff
39
RETAIL
PHENOMENAL
CASE
STUDY
In a global beauty market worth over Within stores, the space dedicated
290bn, Primarks PS Beauty is firmly tobeauty has been expanded and the
making its mark. department has been given a fresh look.
How to guides have been introduced
Now one of Primarks fastest growing creating a new approach to range
departments, all stores feature a collections and making products
comprehensive Beauty offering with easiertoshop.
arangeof more than 1,000 colour
what the bloggers say cosmetics,accessories, fragrance The reaction from customers, press
andskincare products. andkey influencers has been one of high
praise with favourable comparison to
Sales of eye, lip and face cosmetics bigname brand equivalents. The level
Love Laugh and Make Up
continueto grow responding to the ofengagement across social media
I love love love the
illuminating primer, mascara latest trends for contouring, matte lips channels in particular has been very high,
and the lip scrub from the andcolour correcting while expansion with Instagram posts regularly achieving
PSPro range. The of our product range across foundations, in excess of 40,000 likes and Snapchats
packaging looks great, lips and brows has broadened our reaching an average of more than
really simple, but chic. customer base. New categories launched 1.5million views.
this year include: PSPro (professional
Itssabrinaaa level cosmetics), PSSun Protect
Beauty blogger
(suncare range), Skincare, PS Love
(fragrances) and PS Bronze (self-tan
andcosmetics).
Its totally perfect!
The Penneys beauty
range just keeps getting
bigger and better!
Pippa OConnor
Fashion and beauty blogger
CASE
STUDY
WORN
FINANCIAL REVIEW
ourcurrent tax charge in the years changes in the carrying values of inventory, facility which matures in July 2021; and
Strategic report
inwhich the lower rates apply. trade receivables and payables were 0.3bn of local committed facilities in
largely the result of currency translation. Africa and Spain. During the financial
This years tax charge of 221m includes
Average working capital as a percentage year we repaid, from existing cash
an underlying charge of 227m at an
of sales at 8.4% was lower than last resources, 78m of private placement
effective rate of 21.2% (2015 21.3%) on
years 9.4%. Net debt at the year end notes. At the year end, 740m was
the adjusted profit before tax. This years
was 121m higher than last year at drawn down under these committed
effective rate includes the beneficial
315m reflecting the buyout of the facilities. The group also had access
effect of the revaluation of UK deferred
Illovominorities and a 53m increase to0.8bn of uncommitted credit lines
tax balances. This will not be repeated
attributable to the effect of translating under which 142m was drawn at the
next year and, combined with profit
foreign currency denominated net debt year end. Cash and cash equivalents,
increasing in businesses subject to a
atweaker sterling exchange rates. including cash within assets held for
corporation tax rate higher than that in the
sale, totalled 581m at the year end.
UK, we expect the groups effective tax The groups net assets increased by
rate to increase a little from this level. The 611m to 7,122m. Pensions
overall tax charge for the year benefited The deficit in the groups defined benefit
Return on capital employed for the
from a credit of 5m (2015 8m) for tax pension schemes increased from 16m
group, which is calculated by expressing
relief on the amortisation of non-operating last year to 303m, including liabilities
adjusted operating profit as a percentage
intangible assets and goodwill arising held for sale, this year end. The UK
of the average capital employed for the
from previous acquisitions. scheme accounts for 88% of the groups
year, was 18.1% compared with 17.6%
gross liabilities and its deficit was 138m.
Earnings and dividends last year. This reflected the higher profit
Long-term bond yields, which are used to
Last years earnings per share have been and only a small increase in average
value defined benefit pension obligations
restated for the change of accounting capital employed which was primarily
for accounting purposes, have been falling
policy for the valuation of sugar cane the consequence of Primarks expansion.
for some time, with a marked decline
roots with a reduction of 0.5p. Earnings
Cash flow inUK yields at the balance sheet date
attributable to equity shareholders in
The group generated a net cash flow from following the EU referendum. This had a
thecurrent year were 818m and the
operating activities of 1,310m this year material impact on the discounted value
weighted average number of shares
with tight management of working capital of pension liabilities. When considered
inissue during the year, which is
throughout the year. Gross expenditure inthe context of gross pension assets of
usedtocalculate earnings per share,
on property, plant and equipment and 4bn, and with the groups strong balance
was791million (2015 790 million).
intangibles amounted to 796m compared sheet and substantial cash generating
Earningsper ordinary share were 55%
with 613m last year. Primark spent ability, it is well within the groups
higher than last year at 103.4p with
435m on the acquisition of new stores capacity to fund the future requirements
thebenefit of substantially lower losses
and the fit-out of new and existing of all these schemes. However, bond
onsale of businesses and exceptional
stores, while a number of expansion yields at current levels will result in an
items this year. Adjusted earnings per
projects increased the expenditure in increased service cost and ahigher
share, which provides amore consistent
the food businesses. 27m was realised interest charge next year.
measure of trading performance,
from the sale of property, plant and
increased by 5% from 101.5p to 106.2p. The next triennial valuation of the UK
equipment, the major elements of which
scheme is due in April 2017 and it is
The interim dividend was increased were the sale of farmland in South Africa
expected that appropriate contribution
by3% to 10.3p and a final dividend and the continued redevelopment of a
plans, designed to fund the scheme
hasbeen proposed at 26.45p which former factory site in Western Australia
andany deficit over the long term,
represents an overall increase of 5% where further lots were sold for housing
willbeimplemented. The last valuation
forthe year. The proposed dividend is development during the year.
ofthe UK scheme was undertaken
expected to cost 209m and will be
10m was incurred on the acquisition asat5April 2014 which was agreed
charged next year. Dividend cover, on
oftwo small businesses for AB Agri and bythetrustees in December 2014,
anadjusted basis, remains at 2.9 times.
252m was spent on the buyout of the andrevealed a surplus of 79m.
Balance sheet minority interests in Illovo Sugar Limited
The charge for the year for the groups
Non-current assets of 6.9bn were which is shown in the cash flow statement
defined contribution schemes, which
0.6bn higher than last year driven by under financing activities inclusive of
wasequal to the contributions made,
substantially higher capital expenditure costs associated with the buyout.
amounted to 74m (2015 76m).
than depreciation this year and as a result
Financing Thiswas substantially greater than the
of the translation of overseas assets
The financing of the group is managed cash contribution to the defined benefit
ataweaker sterling exchange rate. The
by a central treasury department. The schemes of 38m (2015 39m)
change of accounting policy for sugar
group has total committed borrowing reflecting the changing shape of
cane roots resulted in the reclassification
facilities amounting to 2.1bn, which pensionprovision in the group.
of these assets from non-current
comprise: 0.6bn of US private
biological assets to property, plant and
placement notes maturing between
equipment where they are now carried
2017 and 2024, with an average fixed
athistoric cost rather than fair value. John Bason
rate coupon of 4.7%, 15m of which is
Finance Director
Working capital at the year end was at payable in March 2017; 1.2bn provided
asimilar level to last year. Year-on-year under a syndicated, revolving credit
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
In 2016... 5,880
weve
created
NEW jobs
Our NUTRITION
EDUCATION
websites have helped
8 millionmake more
We RECYCLED
OPERATING ETHICALLY
Strategic report
This is the first year that we have
THE FIVE PILLARS OF OUR chosento separate our work with
suppliers into a distinct pillar. In previous
Our purpose is CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY years, this content has been spread
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
For the same reason, we generated less 59%wasgenerated from the use of Waste management
energy from renewable sources thisyear: bagasse and other renewable sources. In 2016, we generated just over
11,300GWh compared with 12,500GWh 1milliontonnes of waste . Of this, 78%
in 2015. However, 49% of the total We developed detailed reporting guidance (or787,000 tonnes) was diverted from
energy consumed across the group this for our companies including estimation landfill because we reused or recovered it
year was fromrenewable fuel sources. methodologies and assumptions which for a beneficial purpose. Of the remainder,
have taken into account guidance from 5,500 tonnes was hazardous waste,
Greenhouse gas emissions ISO 14064/1 and the Greenhouse Gas a6% reduction on the previous year,
In 2016, our total greenhouse gas (GHG) Protocol. See our CR Reporting Guidance and211,000 tonnes was non-hazardous
emissions fell by 9% to 8.7 million tonnes 2016 at www.abf.co.uk/responsibility for waste , a decrease of 4%.
ofcarbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) . our GHG methodology and more detail
Gross emissions from energy, transport, about how we quantify our emissions Environmental compliance
our processes and agriculture all fell. including emission scopes. In 2016, 93% of our sites operated
without any environmental complaints.
79% of our total emissions came Water usage and disposal We received 62 complaints during
fromthe energy we use in factories, of waste water theyear, 12 more than last year.
offices, warehouses and stores. 11% In 2016, we abstracted 800 million m3 Wealsoreceived ten environmental
were generated by the transportation ofwater, a decrease of 14% compared fines totalling41,000 , six more
ofourgoods and people, by owned with 2015. In the main, this is due to thanwe received in 2015.
orthird-party vehicles. We report the Illovos reduction in water abstracted for
emissions and fuel types associated agricultural use because of the extreme The majority of complaints related
with vehicle movement of materials for dry weather in many parts of southern toodour, noise, discharge standards for
which we are responsible including: raw Africa. There was inadequate water effluent, and transportation. The sites are
materials, ingredients, packaging, waste, inthe rivers and other water sources engaged with relevant stakeholders to
processing aids, and finished products by tofulfil irrigation requirements. maintain good relations and are working
land, sea or air. Process emissions from, with regulators to help us meetor
for example, the production of enzymes, Of the total amount abstracted exceed regulatory standards.
bread baking or the on-site treatment bythegroup, 30% was used in our
ofwaste water, accounted for 8% of the premises and 70% was for agricultural Fatal injuries
total emissions. Agricultural emissions purposes, primarily to irrigate our This year, over 130,000 employees
accounted for theremaining 2%. extensive own-grown sugar cane fields andnumerous contractors worked
insouthernAfrica and sugar beet fields forAssociated British Foods across
As the combustion of sugar cane biomass in Spain. Ofthe water we abstract, a 50countries, with a range of skills,
is regarded as carbon neutral, we also large amount returns to the watercourse expertise andbackgrounds. Safeguarding
disclose our net emissions, i.e. those as part of the natural water cycle. the wellbeing, health and safety of
from conventional fossil fuels, which ourpeople and those who work with
were 4.9 million tonnes of CO2e. This This year, 20 sites reused treated waste uscontinues to be a group priority.
is 7% lower than last year which reflects water for a beneficial purpose before
the overall decrease inenergy used. returning it to the natural watercourse. Loss of life in our operations is entirely
27% was reused mainly for irrigation. unacceptable and we deeply regret
Of the 6.5 million tonnes of CO2e This reduces the amount of water the thatthere werethree fatalities
emittedby ourSugar division, sites need to abstract. thisyear, all in Africa. They were the
Our greenhouse gas emissions
2016 emissions 2015 emissions
(tCO2e) (tCO2e) Types of energy used in 2016 (%)
Combustion of fuel and operation of facilities 7,645,000 8,526,000
Purchased electricity and steam 1,054,000 1,081,000 3 2
8
Total gross emissions 8,699,000 9,607,000
10
Generation and use of renewable energy 3,807,000 4,361,000
Total net emissions 4,892,000 5,246,000 49
Emission intensity (gross) 649 tonnes per 751 tonnes per
1m of revenue 1m of revenue
28
Strategic report
heightandan accident involving large Reportable injuries and is supported by our commitment to
moving machinery. Training continues 445 443 372 465 454 ensure compliance with The Universal
tobe provided to all employees and Declaration of Human Rights. We value
contractors on the importance of our ongoing engagement and collaboration
following safe working procedures with a broad range of interested and
andusing safety equipment such as concerned stakeholder groups. We
safety harnesses and seat belts. areactive in our collaborative approach,
seeking to remain sensitive to the risk
Thorough root cause investigations ofbreaching human rights resulting from
ofallfatalities are conducted to identify our products, services and operations.
opportunities to strengthen our controls. 12 13 14 15 16
The findings are shared beyond the site As a matter of good practice, we
with the rest of the group to ensure that risk-assess the impact that our operations
Details of our health and safety reporting can
allof our businesses learn from their be found in our CRReporting Guidance 2016 may have on the protection and respect
experience. All work-related fatalities at www.abf.co.uk/responsibility of human rights. We ensure a greater
arereported to thegroup board and focus on operations under the jurisdiction
localmanagement isheld to account. of governments that have alesser
involved were required to report
commitment to the protection of
totheGroup Safety and Environment
Injuries to employees humanrights.
Manager on their remedial actions
During 2016, we recorded 454
andare now compliant.
reportable injuries to employees . Addressing modern slavery
Thisrepresents a reduction in our Modern slavery is a global issue that
Gender diversity
reportable injuries to 0.47%. We also requires global action. It can occur in many
We are committed to running
had a 2%decrease in employee Lost different forms including, but not limited
businesses which attract and retain
Time Injuries (LTIs). Overall, 61% of to, forced labour, child labour, domestic
thebest female talent by creating a
ourfactories and stores achieved a servitude or human trafficking. As an
culture that is welcoming to women.
yearsoperation without any reportable international business we have a role to
Theproportion of women in each
injuriesand 48% did not have an LTI. play in eliminating these practices as well
ofourbusinesses varies but, overall,
as respecting human rights across our
thesplit is close to equal in the last
During 2016, our businesses invested own operations and supply chains.
year the percentage of women in the
36m in health and safety, including
workforce was 48%. A third of our
14m specifically on major safety We value our ongoing engagement
senior management positions (32%)
improvement projects. andcollaboration with a broad range of
areheld by women and we continue
interested and concerned stakeholder
tostrive to increase this.
Health and safety fines groups. We operate in 50 countries
During 2016, we received two safety andour supply chains are far-reaching
Human rights
fines totalling 4,600 for breaches and complex. The steps we take to
Associated British Foods promotes
ofsafety regulations. The number of trytoensure that any forms of modern
human rights and dignity through the
fines is half that of last year despite an slavery are not present within our own
employment we create, both directly
increase in the number of operating operations or supply chains areset
andindirectly in our global supply chains,
sitesduring the year. The fines were outinour Modern Slavery Statement
and through the positive contribution
fornotmaintaining relevant authority whichcan be downloaded from our
ourproducts make to peoples lives.
permissions and for breaching noise website atwww.abf.co.uk/modern_
Ourcommitment to respect human
atwork regulations. The businesses slavery_statement.
rights is founded on a strong ethos of
Gender metrics
Associated British Foods plc board directors are not included in the table below. We currently have two women and seven men
on the Companys board.
Number Number Percentage
Number of men of women of senior
Percentage of senior in senior in senior management
Total Men in Women in of women in management management management who are
employees* workforce workforce workforce roles** roles roles women
Risk management Group functional heads including Reporting our principal risks
In order to deliver our strategic plans, Legal,Treasury, Tax, IT, Pensions, anduncertainties
webelieve we must understand and HRand Insurance also provide input to The groups principal risks and
respond appropriately to risks and also thisprocess, sharing with the Director uncertainties identified by the above
consider whether additional business ofFinancial Control their view of key process during 2016 are detailed in the
opportunities can be realised through risks and what activities are in place or following tables. They are grouped into
effective risk management. planned to mitigate them. A summary external risks, which may occur in the
ofthese risk assessments is then markets or environment in which we
We require all of our businesses to sharedand discussed with the Group operate, and operational risks, which
implement appropriate levels of risk Finance Director and Chief Executive arerelated to internal activity linked to
management to ensure compliance atleastannually. our own operations and internal controls.
withrelevant legislation, our overriding The Changes since 2015 highlight
business principles and group policies The board undertakes an annual thesignificant variations in the profile
relating to them. reviewof the material risks facing our ofourprincipal risks or describe our
businesses together with the internal experience and activity over the
We have embedded a process control procedures and resources last year.
foridentifying risks and put in place devoted to them. It also monitors the
activities to mitigate them. Our groups exposure to these risks as part These are the principal risks of the
decentralised business model of the performance reviews undertaken groupas a whole and are not in any
empowers the management of our at each board meeting. Financial risks orderof priority. The operational
businesses to identify, evaluate and arereviewed by the Audit committee andproduct diversity of the group
manage the risks they face on a and all other risks are reviewed by reduces the impact that any one
timelybasis. The collated risks from theboard. businessrisk canhave on the
eachbusiness are shared with the groupsresults.
respectivedivisional chief executives The Director of Financial Control holds
who present their divisional risks to meetings with each of the non-executive The UKs decision to leave the
thegroup executive. directors seeking their feedback on EuropeanUnion has had some
thereviews performed and discussing immediate impact on our results as a
The groups Director of Financial Control the key risks and mitigating activities. consequence of theeffect on currency
receives the risk assessments on an Once all non-executive directors have markets, but theextent to which our
annual basis and, with the Group Finance been consulted, a board report is operations and financial performance
Director, reviews them with the divisional prepared summarising the full process areaffected in the longer term will only
chief executives. These risks and their and providing an assessment of the become apparent as details emerge
impact on business performance are status of risk management across the ofhow the exit is tobe engineered.
reported during the year and are group. The key risks, mitigating controls Bothat a group andindividual business
considered as part of the monthly and relevant policies are summarised. level, we are preparing for changes
management review process. This report also details when formal inlegislation, tradeagreements and
updates, relating to the key risks, will working practices and formulating plans
beprovided to the board throughout to take advantage of the changing
theyear. landscape and to mitigate risk.
Strategic report
EXTERNAL RISKS
MOVEMENT IN EXCHANGE RATES Mitigation Changes since 2015
Businesses impacted by exchange rate Exchange rates between sterling and some
AND INFLATION volatility, specifically those manufacturing of our major trading currencies have changed
Context and potential impact orpurchasing in one currency and selling in markedly this year.
Associated British Foods is a another, constantly review their currency The net impact on adjusted operating profit
multinationalgroup with operations related exposures. for 2015/16 from the translation of overseas
andtransactions in many currencies. Board approved policies require businesses results into sterling was a gain of 5m
Changes in exchange rates give rise to hedge, using foreign exchange forward compared with the prior year but, as a
totransactional exposures within contracts, all transactional currency exposures, resultof our hedging strategies, this has
thebusinesses and to translation and long-term supply or purchase contracts hadonly a limited transactional impact in
exposures when the assets, liabilities which give rise to currency exposures. the financial year although the impact on
andresults ofoverseas entities Borrowings are largely maintained in the margins will be more evident next year.
aretranslated into sterling functional currency of the local operations. The fall in long-term bond yields, particularly
uponconsolidation. since the EU referendum, had a substantial
Cross currency swaps are used to align
borrowings with the underlying currencies impact on the valuation of the groups
Risk trend defined benefit pension obligations.
Increased ofthe groups net assets; (refer to note 25 to
the financial statements in the annual report However, it is well within the groups
for more information). capacity to fund the future requirements
ofall of the groups pension schemes.
Risk trend
Unchanged
OPERATIONAL RISKS
WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY Mitigation Changes since 2015
Safety continues to be the number one Regrettably, there were three fatalities
Context and potential impact priority for our businesses with active thisyear all of which were unrelated
Many of our operations, by their endorsement and accountability from andoccurred in our African operations.
nature,have the potential for injuries thechief executives of each business. Twowerethe result of contractors failing
and fatal accidents to employees, tocomply with group health and safety
contractors andvisitors. Our Health and Safety policy and
practicesare firmly embedded in each policies. A thorough root-cause analysis
business, supporting a strong ethos wasundertaken following each accident
Risk trend
ofworkplace safety. andlessons learned have been widely
Unchanged
shared across the business.
Independent audits are conducted
toverifyimplementation and support
continuous improvement.
Best practice safety and occupational
healthtraining and guidance are shared
across the businesses, co-ordinated from
the corporate centre, to supplement the
delivery of their own training programmes.
Strategic report
OPERATIONAL RISKS CONTINUED
OUR USE OF NATURAL Mitigation Changes since 2015
We aim to go beyond environmental The environmental performance of
RESOURCESAND MANAGING compliance. thegroup, with updates by division,
OURENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Our businesses employ environmental isreportedin the 2016 Corporate
specialists who use the best available Responsibility report at
Context and potential impact www.abf.co.uk/responsibility.
Our businesses rely on a stable technologies and techniques to reduce
supplyofnatural resources some ouruse of consumables, adapt operations
ofwhich are vulnerable to external toclimate change and reduce our
factors such as natural disasters environmental footprint.
andclimate change. We report group environmental
Our operations give rise to a performanceevery year in our Corporate
rangeofemissions including dust, Responsibility and Annual Reports as
wastewaterand waste which, wellasthe voluntary CDP disclosure
ifnotcontrolled,couldlead to a (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project).
risktotheenvironment and our
localcommunities.
Risk trend
Unchanged
Risk trend
Unchanged
VIABILITY STATEMENT
In accordance with the UK Corporate The directors considered the level At 17 September 2016, 1.3bn
Strategic report
Governance Code, the directors ofperformance that would cause the ofcommitted borrowing facilities
arerequired to assess the prospects group to breach its debt covenants, availableto the group were undrawn
oftheCompany taking account of thefinancial implications of making any andthe directors are of the opinion
itscurrent position and principal risks. strategic acquisitions and a variety of thatsubstantial further funding could
Theguidance published by the Financial factors that have the potential to reduce besecured, at relatively short notice,
Reporting Council suggests that profit substantially. These included the should the need arise. The revolving
theperiod of assessment should be rate and success of Primarks expansion, credit facility is not due for renewal
significantly longer than the 12 months actions which could damage the untilJuly 2021 and 316m of the
from the approval of the financial groupsreputation for the long term, privateplacement funding matures
statements that is applied in the andmacroeconomic influences such beyond the period under consideration.
directors going concern consideration asfluctuations in world currency and
(page 61). commodity markets. Consideration was The group has a sound track record
given to the currently benign interest ofdelivering strong cash flows, with
Consistent with the groups business rateenvironment in Europe and the US. wellinexcess of 1bn of operating
model which devolves operational cash being generated annually in each
decision making to the businesses, The implications of the referendum ofthelast five years. This has been more
eachof them sets a strategic planning onthe UKs continued membership than sufficient to fund expansionary
time horizon appropriate to its activities ofthe EU were specifically considered. capital investment and, specifically, has
which are typically of three years duration. Thegroups business model aligns enabled the development of Primark in
In determining the appropriate period production, wherever possible, continental Europe and, more recently,
over which to make their assessment, withtheend markets for its products. the US. Thegroups cash flows have
the directors considered the duration Primarkoperates discrete supply supported 7% compound annual
of these strategic plans, thediverse chainsfor itsstores in each of the UK, growthin the dividend over the last
nature of the groups activities and the USand eurozone and relatively little tenyears.
degree to which the businesses change cross border trading is undertaken
and evolve in the relatively short term. between the UK and the rest of the Even in a worst case scenario,
Aperiod of three years beyond the EU.Specifically, the decline in sterling with risks modelled to materialise
balance sheet date was considered exchange rates against our major simultaneously and for a sustained
appropriate for thegroup. tradingcurrencies will have both period, the likelihood of the group
positiveand negative effects on the having insufficient resources to meet
The directors considered the groups groups profit and the long-term viability its financial obligations is remote.
profitability, cash flows and key financial of the group is unlikely to be affected.
ratios over this period and the potential Based on this assessment, the directors
impact that the Principal Risks and Such is the diversity of the group, confirm that they have a reasonable
Uncertainties set out on pages 48 to52 withoperations across 50 countries expectation that the Company will be
could have on the solvency or liquidity of andsales in more than 100, that none able to continue in operation and meet
the group. Sensitivity analysis was applied ofthe principal risks or uncertainties its liabilities as they fall due over the
to these metrics and the projected cash individually is considered likely to period to 14 September 2019.
flows were stress testedagainst a range haveamaterial impact on the groups
of scenarios. profitability or extensive cash resources. On behalf of the board
Furthermore, the groups business
model means that no significant reliance
is placed on any one group of customers
or suppliers and its diversity reduces Charles Sinclair
therisk that issues affecting a particular Chairman
sector will have a material impact on
thegroup as a whole. George Weston
Chief Executive
John Bason
Finance Director
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP
AND STRONG GOVERNANCE
Board committees key
N Nomination committee
A Audit committee
R Remuneration committee
Charles Sinclair R N
Chairman (age 68)
Charles was appointed a non-executive
director in October 2008 and as Chairman
inApril 2009. With wide business experience
of both the UK andoverseas, his executive
career was latterly with Daily Mail and
General Trust plc, where he was chief
executive from 1989 until he retired from
thatrole and the board in September 2008.
Other appointments:
He is Warden of Winchester College.
George Weston
Chief Executive (age 52)
George was appointed to the board in1999
and took up his current appointment as Chief
Executive in April2005. In his former roles at
Associated British Foods, he was Managing
Director of Westmill Foods, Allied Bakeries
and George Weston Foods Limited
(Australia).
Other appointments:
He is a non-executive director ofWittington
Investments Limited andatrustee of the
Garfield WestonFoundation.
John Bason
Finance Director (age 59)
John was appointed as Finance Director in
May 1999. He has extensive international
business experience and an in-depth
knowledge of the industry. He was previously
the finance director of Bunzl plc and is a
member of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales.
Other appointments:
He is a non-executive director of Compass
Group PLC, a trustee of Voluntary Service
Overseas and chairman of the charity
FareShare.
Governance
Other appointments: formerly Executive Vice President ofretailing. Until 2009, he was chief
She is a director of Wittington Strategy& Planning at Royal Dutch ShellPlc. executive of Mitchells & Butlers plc,
Investments Limited, and of the This role followed a number of senior following its demerger from Six
WGarfield Weston Foundation international roles within Shell, including Continents PLC where he also held the
inCanada. Vice President of their Global Commercial position of chief executive. Previously
Fuels business. She is a physicist he had been a partner of Panmure
by qualification. Gordon & Co before joining Bass PLC
in1990.
Other appointments:
She is a non-executive director of Other appointments:
KellerGroup plc and of Rolls-Royce He is a non-executive director of two
Holdings plc. pub and brewing companies, Hall &
Woodhouse Limited, and Timothy
Taylor & Company Limited, and also
Triple Point VCT 2011 PLC.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
approving major group policies and The non-executive directors Senior executives below board
matters relating to the compliance with In addition to their responsibilities levelareinvited, when appropriate,
the terms of the Relationship Agreement forstrategy and business results, the toattendboard meetings and to
between the Company and its controlling non-executive directors play a key role makepresentations on the results
shareholders dated 14 November 2014. inproviding a solid foundation for good andstrategies of their business units.
The schedule of matters reserved corporate governance and ensure that Papersfor board and committee
isavailable to view on the corporate noindividual or group dominates the meetings are generally provided to
governance section of the Companys boards decision-making. They each directors for board and committee
website (www.abf.co.uk). occupy, or have occupied, senior meetings a week in advance.
positions in industry, bringing valuable
Certain specific responsibilities are The attendance of the directors
external perspective to the boards
delegated to the board committees, atboardand committee meetings
deliberations through their experience
notably the Audit, Remuneration duringthe year to 17 September 2016
and insight from other sectors enabling
andNomination committees, which isshownin the table below. Where
them to contribute significantly to board
operatewithin clearly defined terms adirector was unable to participate in
decision-making. The formal letters of
ofreference and report regularly to the ameeting either in person or remotely,
appointment of non-executive directors
board. Forfurther details, please see theChairman solicited their views on
are available for inspection at the
Board committees section below. keyitems of business in advance of
Companys registered office.
Governance
therelevant meeting and shared these
Authority for the operational
Election and re-election of directors with the meeting so that they were
management of the groups business
In accordance with the Codes ableto contribute to the debate.
has been delegated to the Chief
recommendations, all directors currently
Executive for execution or further Board committees
in office will be proposed for election or
delegation by him for the effective The board has established
re-election at the 2016 annual general
day-to-day running and management threeprincipalboard committees,
meeting to be held in December.
ofthe group. The chief executive of towhichithas delegated certain
eachbusiness within the group has Board meetings ofitsresponsibilities. These are the
authority for that business and reports The board held a total of eight meetings Audit, Nomination and Remuneration
directly to the Chief Executive. during the year. Periodically, board committees. Themembership,
meetings take place away from the responsibilities andactivities of these
Chairman and Chief Executive
corporate centre in London. During the committees aredescribed later in
The roles of the Chairman and the
year under review, one of the meetings thiscorporate governance report
ChiefExecutive are separately held
was held at Primarks offices in Dublin, and,inthe case oftheRemuneration
andthe division of their responsibilities
providing the non-executive directors in committee, in theRemuneration
isclearly established, set out in writing,
particular with the opportunity to meet reportwhich starts on page 69.
and agreed by the board to ensure
local management and other employees. Membership of thesecommittees
thatno one has unfettered powers of
The board held another of its meetings isreviewed annually. Minutes of
decision. The Chairman, Charles Sinclair,
away from the centre and visited the committee meetings are made
is responsible for the operation and
ABVista Marlborough site for a tour availableto all directors on a
leadership of the board, ensuring its
andto meet local management. timely basis.
effectiveness and setting its agenda.
TheChief Executive, George Weston,
isresponsible for leading and managing
Audit Nomination Remuneration
the groups business within a set of Board committee committee committee
authorities delegated by the board
Charles Sinclair 8/8 1/1 6/6
andfor the implementation of board
George Weston 8/8
strategyand policy.
John Bason 8/8
Senior Independent Director Emma Adamo 8/8
Tim Clarke is the Companys recognised Ruth Cairnie1 8/8 4/4 1/1 6/6
Senior Independent Director. The role Tim Clarke 8/8 1/1 6/6
ofthe Senior Independent Director is to Javier Ferrn2 8/8 1/1 1/1 6/6
act as a sounding board for the Chairman Wolfhart Hauser3 8/8 4/4 1/1 6/6
and to serve as an intermediary for other Lord Jay4 1/1 1/1 1/1
directors where necessary. He is also Richard Reid5 3/3 1/1 3/3
available to shareholders should a need
Peter Smith6 4/5 3/3 2/3
arise to convey concerns to the board
which they have been unable to convey 1
Ruth Cairnie was appointed as a member of the Nomination committee on 1 November 2015.
2
Javier Ferrn stepped down as a member of the Audit committee on 26 October 2015.
through the Chairman or through the 3
Wolfhart Hauser was appointed as a member of the Nomination committee on 13 April 2016.
executive directors. During the year, 4
Lord Jay retired as a director and ceased to be a member of the Audit, Nomination and Remuneration
ledby the Senior Independent Director, committees on 30 November 2015.
5
Richard Reid was appointed as a non-executive director, chairman of the Audit committee
the non-executive directors have met andamember of the Remuneration committee with effect from 14 April 2016.
without the presence of the Chairman 6
Peter Smith retired and ceased to be chairman of the Audit committee andamember of the
Nomination and Remuneration committees on 13 April 2016. He was unable toattend one board
(including to appraise the Chairmans and Remuneration committee meeting but he reviewed the relevant information andprovided
performance). comments to the Chairman.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
and is satisfied that, on the basis of andjudgement and that there are no All new directors are encouraged to
thefacts outlined above, the former relationships or circumstances which accelerate their knowledge of the group
KPMG relationship would not in any way are likely to affect, or could appear by visiting a variety of its businesses
compromise Richards independence toaffect, his judgement. Javier andoperations. Key elements of the
and that it was in the best interests isoffering himself for re-election induction programme undertaken by
ofthe group to appoint him as an attheannual general meeting and Richard to date following his appointment
independent non-executive director of the theboard will continue to keep are set out below:
Company. Further details of the process hisindependence under review.
by which Richard was appointed are Board and governance
During the year, Lord Jay and Peter Smith
given in the Nomination committee
retired from the board as non-executive Legal and regulatory duties of a UK
report on page 64. listedcompany director.
directors, on 30 November 2015 and
The Code requires that, if a director 13April 2016, respectively. As at the Group governance framework including
hasserved on the board for more than date of this report, the board comprises matters reserved to the board for
nine years, the board should state its the Chairman, Chief Executive, Finance itsdecision and committee terms
reasons why it considers the director, Director and six non-executive directors. ofreference.
notwithstanding his or her length Inside information policy and procedures,
Biographical and related information
ofservice, to be independent. restrictions and procedures for dealing
about the directors is set out on pages
Governance
Accordingly, the board has considered inthe Companys shares.
54 and 55.
theindependence of Tim Clarke and Procedure for dealing with board
Javier Ferrn as follows: Appointments to the board conflicts, guidance and procedures on
There is a formal and transparent related party transactions and transactions
as at 3 November 2016, Tim with controlling shareholders.
procedure for the appointment of new
Clarkehad served 12 years as a
directors to the board. Details are The groups approach to corporate
director ofthe Company. The board
available in the Nomination committee responsibility.
hascontinued to keep Tims
report set out on page 63 which also
independence under close review Management meetings and site visits
provides details of the committees
given his length of service. Having
roleand activities. Individual meetings with members of the
given careful consideration to the
matter, the board is satisfied that Tim Commitment senior management team at the group
centre including an Audit committee
continues to demonstrate the The letters of appointment for the
briefing with Group Financial Controller.
qualities of independence in carrying Chairman and the non-executive directors
out his role as a non-executive director set out the expected time commitment Meetings with the chief executives of
ABMauri, ABF Ingredients and George
and Senior Independent Director, required of them and are available for
Weston Foods.
supporting the team in an objective inspection by any person during normal
and independent manner. The business hours at the Companys Visits to a number of group businesses
boardconsiders that he continues registered office and at the annual general for meetings with local management
including AB Sugar and AB Agri in
tobe independent in character and meeting. Other significant commitments
Peterborough, a bakery site tour at
judgement and that there are no of the Chairman and non-executive AlliedBakeries in Stevenage and a
relationships or circumstances which directors are disclosed on appointment tourofthe Twinings Andover factory.
are likely to affect, or could appear to and require approval thereafter.
Tour of a number of Primark stores with
affect, his judgement. Tim retains his
Board development the Primark CEO and senior management.
role as Senior Independent Director Attended Lancaster and Leicester
The Chairman, with the support of the
and is offering himself for re-election storeopenings.
Company Secretary, is responsible for
at the annual general meeting.
the induction of new directors and the Attending a session of the ABF
Theboard will continue to keep WomensBusiness Education Forum.
continuing development of directors.
hisindependence under review.
Board induction
as at 1 November 2016, Javier Ferrn
Richard Reid joined the board as Following his appointment in January
had served ten years as a director
anon-executive director on 14 April 2015, Wolfhart Hausers induction
ofthe Company. Javiers service
2016and undertook a formal, tailored programme continued during the year
andconsequent knowledge and
programme of induction, facilitated by the under review with further site visits and
experience of the group, together with
Chairman and the Company Secretary. management meetings including to AB
the invaluable retail experience he
World Foods in Leigh for an introduction
brings to the role, are highly regarded Richards induction took account of
to its operations and supply chain;
by the board. Notwithstanding his hisprior knowledge of the group, his
attending a Primark sourcing, technical
length of service and, having given experience and business perspectives
and compliance meeting in Dublin;
due deliberation to the matter, the and the committees on which he serves.
afactory tour and site presentation at
board is satisfied that Javier The aim of the programme was to allow
ABMauri in Hull; a visit to Vivergo Fuels
continues to demonstrate the Richard to refresh and develop his
in Hull to receive an overview of the
qualities of independence and knowledge of how the group operates
business and plant tour; a visit to Twinings
objectivity in carrying out his role through its five strategic business
in Andover to discuss a broad agenda
asanon-executive director. The segments and to familiarise him with
including tea procurement and supply
board considers that he continues itsgovernance policies and procedures
chain-related issues and a site visit
tobe independent in character and his duties as a director.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
2016 objectives
considers each conflict situation Thislonger term viability statement
separately on its particular facts; issetout on page 53.
Board meetings
More time to be taken for reflective
considers the conflict situation Internal control and risk management
discussion and debate after divisional inconjunction with the rest of the The directors confirm that the board has
presentations with feedback provided conflicted directors duties under undertaken a robust assessment of the
tothe Chief Executive to share, as the2006 Act; principal risks facing the group, including
appropriate, with divisional management. those that could threaten its business
keeps records and board minutes as
model, future performance, solvency
Non-executive directors to authorisations granted by directors
orliquidity. A description of the principal
Non-executive directors encouraged and the scope of any approvals
risks and how they are being managed
totake more opportunities to engage given;and
and mitigated is set out on pages 48
withthe businesses (beyond the initial
regularly reviews conflict authorisation. to52.
visits organised as part of the induction
programme) to enable them to build Accountability The board acknowledges its
adeeper understanding of the Financial and business reporting responsibilities for monitoring the
groupsoperations. The board is required by the Code groups risk management and internal
Recognising that the involvement of topresent a fair, balanced and control systems to facilitate the
thenon-executive directors could be of understandable assessment of the identification, assessment and
Governance
benefit to the individual businesses, and Companys position, performance, management of risk, the protection
given their willingness to provide advice business model and strategy. In relation ofshareholders investments and the
based on their business experience, a
to this requirement, reference is made to groups assets. The directors recognise
more detailed description of their areas
the statement of directors responsibilities that they are responsible for providing
ofexpertise to be compiled and made
available to the businesses to facilitate for preparing the financial statements set areturn to shareholders, which is
knowledge and skills transfer. out on page 91 of this annual report and consistent with the responsible
accounts. The board recognises that its assessment and mitigation of risks.
Risk management responsibility to present a fair, balanced
Effective controls ensure that the
The non-executive directors desired and understandable assessment extends
greater visibility of emerging strategic
groupsexposure to avoidable risk
to interim and other price-sensitive
risks. Future divisional presentations isminimised, that proper accounting
publicreports, reports to regulators,
toinclude more detail in this area. records are maintained, that the
andinformation required to be
financialinformation used within
presentedby statutory requests.
Succession and talent thebusiness is reliable andthat the
There should be further emphasis and Business model consolidated accounts preparation and
discussion, with input from all members, A description of the Companys business financial reporting processes comply
on the future shape of the board through model for sustainable growth is set out with all relevant regulatory reporting
more frequent meetings of the Nomination in the group business model and strategy requirements. Thedynamics of the
committee. A need to spend more time
section on pages 8 and 9 and in the group and the environment within
on the critical issue of non-board executive
succession was also highlighted.
business strategies section on pages whichit operates arecontinually
10and 11. These sections provide an evolvingtogether with itsexposure
Audit committee explanation of the basis on which the torisk. The systems are designed
Acknowledging the opportunity, with group generates value and preserves tomanage, rather than eliminate, the
achange of committee chairman, to itover the long term and its strategy riskofassets being unprotected and to
makea few practical changes to facilitate fordelivering its objectives. guardagainst their unauthorised use
the running of the meetings and the andthe failure to achieve business
functioning of the committee. Going concern and viability
objectives. Internal controls can
After making enquiries the directors
onlyprovide reasonable andnot
havea reasonable expectation that the
Based on the outcome of the 2016 absoluteassurance against material
Company and the group have adequate
review, it was concluded that the board misstatement or loss.
resources to continue in operational
and its committees were continuing to existence for a period of at least 12 The directors confirm that there is a
function very effectively with a good months from the date of approval of process for identifying, evaluating and
balance of support, challenge and mutual these annual financial statements. managing the risks faced by the group
trust between the executives and the Accordingly, and consistent with the and the operational effectiveness of
non-executives. Each of the directors guidance contained in the document therelated controls, which has been
was considered to be making a valuable titled Guidance on Risk Management, inplace for the year under review and
contribution and with proper commitment, Internal Control and Related Financial uptothe date of approval of the annual
including of time, to their respective roles. and Business Reporting published by report and accounts. They also confirm
Conflicts of interest procedure the FRC in 2014, they continue to adopt that they have regularly monitored the
The Company has procedures in the going concern basis in preparing effectiveness of the risk management
placetodeal with the situation where theannual financial statements. and internal control systems (which
adirector has a conflict of interest. cover all material controls including
The Code requires the directors to
Aspart of this process, the board: financial, operational and compliance
assess and report on the prospects
controls) utilising the review process
ofthe group over a longer period.
setout on the following page.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Governance
leading the process for board theChief Executive, members of
In line with best practice, the Companys appointments and making seniormanagement, headof human
default means of communication is recommendations to the board; resources and external advisors may
online although shareholders can opt
regularly reviewing the board beinvited to attend meetings as
into receive documents in paper form
structure,size and composition andwhen appropriate.
atany time. The Companys website (includingthe skills, knowledge,
(www.abf.co.uk) provides current and independence, experience and The Chairman does not chair the
historical financial information, including diversity),recommending any Nomination committee when it is
trading statements, news releases, necessarychanges; dealingwith the appointment of his
financial results presentations, and a considering plans for orderly successor. In these circumstances
wealth of other information regarding successionfor appointments to the thecommittee ischaired by an
Associated British Foods. boardand tosenior management independent non-executive director
tomaintain anappropriate balance elected by theremaining members.
Annual general meeting (AGM)
ofskillsand experience within the
The 2016 AGM will be held on Friday, Company and toensure progressive The committee may take independent
9December 2016 at 11.00 am at the refreshment oftheboard; professional advice on any matters
Congress Centre in London. The board covered by its terms of reference at
keeping under review the leadership
considers that the AGM provides a theCompanys expense.
needs of the group, both executive
valuable communication opportunity andnon-executive, to ensure The committee chairman reports the
forprivate shareholders, in particular, thecontinued ability of the group outcome of meetings to the board.
tohear about the general development organisation to compete efficiently
of the business and to ask questions inthemarketplace; and The terms of reference of the Nomination
ofthe Chairman and, through him, being responsible for identifying committee are available on the Investors
thechairmen of the key committees andnominating, for the approval section of the Companys website
andother directors. All members oftheboard,candidates to fill board (www.abf.co.uk).
oftheboard are available to talk to vacanciesas and when they arise.
Board appointments process
shareholders after the meeting.
The process for making new
A trading update is provided at the appointments is led by the Chairman.
meeting and, each year, the Company Where appropriate, external, independent
shows a short film at the meeting consultants are engaged to conduct a
highlighting a particular area of the search for potential candidates, who are
groups business. At this years AGM, considered on the basis of their skills,
the film will focus on the move to full experience and fit with the existing
ownership by Associated British Foods members of the board. The Nomination
ofIllovo Sugar Limited. committee has procedures for appointing
a non-executive or an executive director
The Notice of AGM, which sets out in
and these are set out in its terms
full the resolutions for consideration by
ofreference.
shareholders together with explanatory
notes, has been sent to shareholders Meetings
and is also available on the Investors The committee met once during the
section of the Companys website yearunder review.
(www.abf.co.uk). All resolutions for
which notice has been given will
bedecided on a poll.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Committee activities during the year toits diversity policy but candidates
Appointment of a new independent
non-executive director
forfuture board appointments will be
considered from the widest possible
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Nomination committee and the pool. Gender remains an important Members
board adhere to the principle that aspect of the overall diversity, and it is
appointments to the board should ourpolicy to ask any executive search During the year and at the date ofthisreport:
bemade on the basis of merit. agencies engaged to ensure that half Richard Reid (member and chairman
ofthe candidates they put forward from 14 April 2016)
During the year, as part of an ongoing Peter Smith (member and chairman
forconsideration are women.
programme for the progressive until13 April 2016)
refreshing of the board, the Chairman Looking beyond the board to the Ruth Cairnie
ledthe process for the appointment groupswider workforce, we recognise Javier Ferrn (until 26 October 2015)
ofanew independent non-executive that true diversity can only be achieved Lord Jay (until 30 November 2015)
director, who could also take on the when the entire workforce is committed Wolfhart Hauser
roleof Audit committee chairman. to delivering it. There are a number of Primary responsibilities
ongoing initiatives across Associated
It is generally the committees practice In accordance with its terms of
British Foods which aim to promote
toengage the services of an independent reference,the Audit committees
diversity. A groupwide gender diversity
executive search consulting firm, or to primaryresponsibilities include:
task force, which includes representation
consider open advertising, to assist in Financial reporting
from across the five divisions of the
the search for potential candidates from monitoring the integrity of the groups
business, has as one of its principal
a range of backgrounds. Cognisant of the financial statements and any formal
objectives the aim of ensuring that
fact that the Audit committee chairman announcements relating to the
thereare no barriers preventing talented
role, vacated on the retirement from the Companys performance, reviewing
people from succeeding. Senior and significant financial reporting
board of Peter Smith on 13 April 2016,
high-potential women are invited to judgementscontained in them
required a particular set of financial skills,
joinanother initiative, the Womens beforetheir submission to
expertise and experience, the board
Business Education Forum, which the board;
considered potential candidates from
meetsseveral times a year providing informing the board of the outcome
thevery highest level of the accounting
achance for networking, learning of thegroups external audit and
profession. On this occasion the
andsupport for personal career explaining how itcontributed to the
committee took the view that this
development. For a number of years, integrity offinancial reporting;
approach would achieve the right outcome
training in unconscious bias has been reviewing and challenging, where
for the Company and accordingly that
included in the groups leadership necessary, the consistency of, and
itwas not necessary to use the services
development programme and this changes to, accounting and treasury
of a search consulting firm or to utilise
training is now being extended to a policies; whether the group has
open advertising.
wider group of managers; the training followedappropriate accounting
Richard Reid, formerly a partner at aims to build awareness and challenge policiesand made appropriate
KPMG, was identified as the outstanding commonly held myths around diversity. estimatesand judgements;
theclarityandcompleteness of
candidate who best fulfilled the brief
Re-election of disclosure; significant adjustments
developed by the committee. Following
non-executive directors resulting fromthe audit; the going
aseries of rigorous interviews with concern assumption, the viability
The committee reviewed the results
members of the board, on the statement, andcompliance with
ofthe annual board performance
recommendation of the Nomination auditingstandards;
evaluation that related to the
committee, the board approved the Narrative reporting
composition of the board and the
appointment of Richard Reid with at the boards request, reviewing
timeneeded to fulfil the roles of
effectfrom 14 April 2016. Biographical thecontent of the annual report and
Chairman, Senior Independent
details about Richard can be found accounts and advising the board on
Directorand non-executive director.
onpage 55. Information about how whether, taken as a whole, it is fair,
Itwas satisfied that all members balanced and understandable and
theboard determined his independence
oftheboard are devoting sufficient provides the information necessary for
is set out in the section on board
timetotheir duties. shareholders to assess the Companys
composition on page 58.
position and performance, business
The committee considered the
Diversity policy model and strategy;
re-election of directors prior to
As a board, we recognise that where requested by the board,
theirrecommended approval by
diversityiskey for introducing different assistingin relation to the boards
shareholdersat the annual general
perspectives into board debate and assessment ofthe principal risks
meeting. The non-executive directors
decision-making. A genuinely diverse facingthe Company and the prospects
who have beenon the board for ofthe Company for the purposes of
board comprises individuals with
morethan sixyears were subject disclosures required inthe annual
arangeof personal attributes,
toparticularlyrigorous review. reportand accounts;
perspectives, skills, experience and
backgrounds, as well as representing The committees effectiveness
differences in nationality, race and gender. isreviewed on an annual basis as
The board has decided against setting partofthe boards performance
anymeasurable objectives in relation evaluationprocess.
Governance
monitoring and reviewing the role, Smith as a non-executive director and information, as well as to employees
effectiveness and independence chairman of the Audit committee on ofthe Company and the external
ofthegroups internal audit function 13April 2016; Javier Ferrn stepped auditors.
inthecontext of the groups overall
down as a member on 26 October 2015;
financial risk management system; and The committee may take independent
and Lord Jay ceased to be a member
External audit professional advice on any matters
ofthe committee on his retirement
overseeing the relationship with the covered by its terms of reference at
asanon-executive director on
groups external auditors, including theCompanys expense.
reporting to the board each year whether
30November 2015.
it considers the audit contract should be The committee chairman reports the
The committee structure requires
put out to tender, adhering to any legal outcome of meetings to the board.
theinclusion of at least one financially
requirements for tendering or rotation of
qualified member (as recognised The committees effectiveness
the audit services contract as appropriate,
bytheConsultative Committee of isreviewed on an annual basis as
reviewing and monitoring the external
auditors objectivity and independence, Accountancy Bodies) with recent partofthe boards performance
agreeing the scope of their work and andrelevant financial experience and evaluationprocess.
fees paid to them for audit, assessing competence in accounting or auditing
The terms of reference of the
theeffectiveness of the audit process, (orboth). The committee chairmen
Auditcommittee were reviewed
and agreeing the policy in relation fulfilled this requirement during
totheprovision of non-audit services.
andupdatedduring the year and can
theyear.All committee members
beviewed on the Investors section
areexpected tobefinancially literate
of the Companys website
andtohave an understanding of
(www.abf.co.uk).
thefollowing areas:
Meetings
the principles of, and developments
The Audit committee met four times
in, financial reporting including the
during the year. The committee
applicable accounting standards
agendaare linked to events in the
andstatements of recommended
groups financial calendar.
practice;
Activities during the year
key aspects of the Companys
In order to fulfil its terms of reference,
operations including corporate
the Audit committee receives and
policies and the groups internal
reviews presentations and reports
control environment;
fromthe groups senior management,
matters which may influence consulting as necessary with the
thepresentation of accounts external auditors.
andkeyfigures;
Monitoring the integrity of
the principles of, and developments reported financial information
in, company law, sector-specific Ensuring the integrity of the
lawsand other relevant corporate financialstatements and associated
legislation; announcements is a fundamental
responsibility of the Audit committee.
the role of internal and external
auditing and risk management; and
the regulatory framework for the
groups businesses.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
During the year it formally reviewed any significant adjustments to statements. The committee has,
thegroups interim and annual reports, financial reporting arising from withsupport fromErnst & Young as
including the associated pre-close theaudit; external auditor, reviewed the suitability
periodtrading updates, and the trading of the accounting policies which have
litigation and contingent liabilities
updates issued for the first and third been adopted andwhether management
affecting the group; and
quarters. These reviews considered: hasmade appropriate estimates
potential tax contingencies, andjudgements.
the accounting principles, policies
compliance with statutory tax
andpractices adopted in the groups Set out below are the areas considered
obligations and the groups
financial statements, any proposed by the Audit committee to be the most
tax policy.
changes to them, and the adequacy significant accounting issues and a
of their disclosure; Significant accounting description of how the committee
issuesconsidered by the Audit concluded that such judgements and
important accounting issues, areas
committeeinrelation to the estimates were appropriate. These
ofcomplexity and the actions,
groupsfinancialstatements aredivided between those that could
estimates and judgements of
A key responsibility of the committee have a material impact on the financial
management inrelation to financial
isto consider the significant areas of statements and those that are less
reporting andinparticular the
complexity, management judgement likelyto have a material impact
assumptions underlying the going
andestimation that have been applied butnevertheless, by their nature,
concern and viability statements;
inthe preparation of the financial requiredadegree of estimation.
Impairment of goodwill, intangible The committee considered the reasonableness of cash flow projections which were
andtangible assets basedon the most recent budget approved by the board and reflected managements
Assessment for impairment involves expectations of sales growth, operating costs and margins based on past experience and
comparing the book value of an asset with external sources of information. Long-term growth rates for periods not covered by the
its recoverable amount (being the higher of annual budget were challenged to ensure they were appropriate for the products, industries
value in use and fair value less costs to sell). and countries in which the relevant cash generating units operate. The committee also
Value in use is determined with reference reviewed and challenged the key assumptions made in deriving these projections: discount
toprojected future cash flows discounted rates, growth rates, and expected changes in production and sales volumes, selling prices
atan appropriate rate. Both the cash flows and direct costs. The committee also considered the adequacy of the disclosures in
and the discount rate involve a significant respectof the key assumptions and sensitivities. Refer to notes 8 and 9 to the financial
degree of estimation uncertainty. statements for more details of these assumptions.
The committee was satisfied that the discount rate assumptions appropriately reflected
current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks associated with
theparticular assets. The other key assumptions were all considered to be reasonable.
The external auditor explained the results of their own review of the estimate of value in
use, including their challenge of managements underlying cash flow projections as well
asthe long-term growth assumptions and discount rates. On the basis of their audit work,
and their challenge of the key assumptions and associated sensitivities, they concurred
with managements conclusion that no impairments were required.
Tax provisions The committee reviews the Companys tax policy and principles for managing tax
The level of current and deferred tax risksannually.
recognised in the financial statements is The committee reviewed and challenged the provisions recorded at the balance sheet
dependent on subjective judgements as to dateand management confirmed that they represent their best estimate of the likely
the outcome of decisions by tax authorities financial exposure faced by the group.
invarious jurisdictions around the world
andthe ability of the group to use tax The external auditor explained to the committee the work they had conducted during
losseswithin the time limits imposed by theyear, including how their audit procedures were focused on those provisions requiring
thevarious tax authorities. See also thehighest degree of judgement. The committee discussed with both management and
referenceto taxation on page 42. the external auditor the key judgements which had been made. It was satisfied that the
judgements were reasonable and that, accordingly, the provision amounts recorded
wereappropriate.
Governance
Post-retirement benefits Actuarial valuations of the groups pension scheme obligations are undertaken every
Valuation of the groups pension threeyears by independent qualified actuaries who also provide advice to management
schemesand post-retirement medical onthe assumptions to be used in preparing the accounting valuations each year. Details
benefit schemes require various subjective ofthe assumptions made in the current and previous year are disclosed in note 11 ofthe
judgements to be made including mortality financial statements together with the bases on which those assumptions have been made.
assumptions, discount rates, general and The committee reviewed the assumptions by comparison with externally derived data
salary inflation, and the rate of increase andalso considered the adequacy of disclosures in respect of the sensitivity of the
forpensions in payment and those surplusor deficit to changes in these key assumptions.
indeferment.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
External audit The Audit committee has formally To fulfil its responsibility for oversight
Auditor independence reviewed the independence of its ofthe external audit process, the Audit
The Audit committee is responsible for auditors. Ernst & Young LLP has committee reviewed:
the development, implementation and provided a letter confirming that
the terms, areas of responsibility,
monitoring of policies and procedures itbelieves it remained independent
associated duties and scope of
onthe use of the external auditor throughout the year, within the
theaudit as set out in the external
fornon-audit services, in accordance meaningof the regulations on this
auditors engagement letter;
withprofessional and regulatory matter and in accordance with their
requirements. These policies are kept professional standards. the overall work plan and fee proposal;
under review to meet the objective
To fulfil its responsibility to ensure the the major issues that arose during the
ofensuring that the group benefits
independence of the external auditors, course of the audit and their resolution;
inacost-effective manner from the
the Audit committee reviewed:
cumulative knowledge and experience key accounting and audit judgements;
ofits auditors whilst also ensuring that a report from the external auditors
the level of errors identified during
the auditors maintain the necessary describing their arrangements to
the audit; and
degree of independence and objectivity. identify, report and manage any
The committee has revised its policy on conflicts of interest, and their policies recommendations made by the
the use of the external auditor to provide and procedures for maintaining external auditors in their management
non-audit services, in accordance with independence and monitoring letters and the adequacy of
applicable laws and taking into account compliance with relevant managements response.
the relevant ethical guidance for auditors. requirements; and
Auditor appointment
Any non-audit work to be undertaken
the extent of non-audit services The Audit committee reviews
bythe auditor now requires authorisation
provided by the external auditors. annuallythe appointment of the
by the Group Finance Director and
auditor,taking into account the auditors
theAudit committee prior to its The total fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP
effectiveness and independence,
commencement. The committee also for the year ended 17 September 2016
andmakes arecommendation to the
ensures that fees incurred, or to be were 6.7m of which 1.2m related
board accordingly. Any decision to
incurred, for non-audit services both tonon-audit work. Further details
opentheexternal audit to tender is taken
individually and in aggregate, do not areprovided in note 2 to the
onthe recommendation of the Audit
exceed any limits in applicable law and financialstatements.
committee. There are no contractual
take into account the relevant ethical
Consideration is also given by the Audit obligations that restrict the Companys
guidance for auditors.
committee to the need to include the current choice of external auditor.
The committee is required to approve risk of the withdrawal of the external
In accordance with the requirements
theuse of the external auditor to auditors from the market in its risk
ofthe 2014 UK Corporate Governance
provide:accounting advice and training; evaluation and planning.
Code and other changes to the EU and
corporate responsibility and other
Auditor effectiveness UK regulatory framework, the Audit
assurance services; financial due
To assess the effectiveness of the committee undertook a comprehensive
diligence in respect of acquisitions
external auditors, the committee competitive tender for the external
anddisposals; and will consider other
reviewed: auditduring 2015 and the appointment
services when it is in the best interests
ofErnst & Young LLP to replace the
of the Company to do so, provided they the external auditors fulfilment of
Companys previous auditors was
can be undertaken without jeopardising theagreed audit plan and variations
approved by shareholders at the AGM
auditor independence. With effect from it;
on4 December 2015. Accordingly,
from18 September 2016, tax services
reports highlighting the major theCompany has no current
including tax compliance, tax planning
issuesthat arose during the course retenderingplans.
and related implementation advice
ofthe audit;
maynot be undertaken by the external Compliance with the CMA Order
auditor. The aggregate expenditure feedback from the businesses The Company confirms that, during
withthe group auditor is reviewed by evaluating the performance of theperiod under review, it has complied
theAudit committee. No individually eachassigned audit team; and with the provisions of The Statutory
significant non-audit assignments Audit Services for Large Companies
a report from the Audit Quality
thatwould require disclosure were Market Investigation (Mandatory Use
Review Team of the Financial
undertaken in the financial year. ofCompetitive Tender Processes and
Reporting Council (FRC).
Audit Committee Responsibilities)
The Company has a policy that any
The Audit committee holds private Order2014.
partners, directors or senior managers
meetings with the external auditors
hired directly from the external auditors
aftereach committee meeting to
must be pre-approved by the Group
reviewkey issues within their sphere
HRDirector, and the Group Finance
ofinterest and responsibility.
Director or Group Financial Controller,
with the chairman of the Audit
committee being consulted as
appropriate.
REMUNERATION REPORT
Annual statement by the Remuneration committee chairman
I am pleased to present the Directors oftheSugar businesses. Across the George Weston has requested
Remuneration report for the year totalincentives package, 68% of thathisincentive opportunity as a
ended 17 September 2016 on behalf themaximum financial performance percentage of salary be consistent
ofthe board. measurement will remain based on withthat of theGroup Finance
theperformance of the whole group Directorrather than being aligned
This Remuneration report is split
and32% will be based on performance withthe higher market levels typical
intotwo sections:
excluding Sugar. We believe that it is forChief Executives. Bearing in
a new directors remuneration right to make this change now in view mindthat we intend these incentive
policy; and ofthe uncertainties faced by the EU arrangements to endure without
sugar industry over the next few years. material change for many years,
the annual implementation
thecommittee needs to ensure
reportonremuneration. We propose adopting a return on
thattheremuneration policy is not a
average capital employed (ROCE)
Review of remuneration policy barriertofuture succession. As such,
modifier on the LTIP. The modifier will
Last year I explained that we had we areallowing flexibility within our
beused to adjust the calculated outcome
decided to undertake a complete remuneration policy for our incentive
based on eps performance downwards
Governance
review of the groups incentive plans to offer a fully market-competitive
if ROCE targets have not been delivered.
arrangements during the course package to any future Chief Executive.
We are seeking shareholder approval
ofthisyear.
fora new set of LTIP rules at this years Shareholder engagement
The starting point of our review was AGMto ensure that the LTIP can be In May and June 2016 we consulted
areflection on the shape and nature of operated consistently with the extensively with our largest shareholders
the groups portfolio and the challenges remuneration policy. and their representative bodies on our
that our business model presents in remuneration structure. We welcomed
We considered the market-
designing incentives that align with the constructive feedback provided
competitiveness of our reward package
ourremuneration principles and fairly andhave taken full account of it in
and concluded that, whilst our salaries
reward performance. Whilst we ourfinal proposals.
are well aligned with companies of a
considered adviceon market practice
comparable size in the FTSE 100 and Shareholders appreciated:
from our remuneration advisors,
reflect the tenure and experience of our
WillisTowers Watson, the main the introduction of a return-based
executive directors, our incentives have
elements of this plan were developed performance measure on the LTIP;
fallen materially behind market levels.
by the committee. This is consistent
We are a global organisation with the increase (from 100% of salary
with the subsequent report of the
businesses in 50 countries operating in to250% of salary) in the level
Executive Remuneration Working
different industries. We therefore need ofshareholding required of our
Group of the Investment Association
experienced leaders to run the group executive directors;
(ERWG) and enabled us to focuson
well, in the interests of all of our
what would drive business performance the agreement to disclose STIP
stakeholders. Although wishing to guard
rather than aligning with aone size targets retrospectively; and
against the inflationary effect of using
fits all external norm.
market data, the committee believes it the addition of value in the form
Our businesses are diverse, not only has a duty to investors to ensure that ofshares rather than cash.
interms of their products and services remuneration arrangements for senior
We discussed with our investors
but also in terms of their life cycles and executives aresufficiently attractive to
waysof ensuring that sugar price
their contribution to total shareholder retain thetalented individuals that run
volatility is properly dealt with in our
return. Financial analysts value the ourbusinesses.
incentives. A significant majority
Companys shares on a sumof
We are therefore proposing the agreedwith our proposed approach.
theparts basis, attributing agreater
additionof a new incentive element Some other alternatives that were
price-earnings multiple to Primark
witha maximum value of 50% of suggested included:
thanto Sugar. Profitability inthe Sugar
salaryin the form of a deferred award
business in recent years has been measuring group eps over the
ofsharesthat will be released to
volatile. World and European sugar length of the sugar cycle or on
participants three years from the start
prices, which are outside management arolling multi-year basis;
ofthe Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP)
control, can have an impact on incentive
performance period. We have chosen using strategy-aligned metrics; or
outcomes that is disproportionate to
ashare-based incentive to reflect the
their impact onshareholders. substituting eps with a total
performance of the business over
shareholder return (TSR)measure.
To address the above concerns we timeand provide a link between short
propose introducing a second adjusted andlong-term performance. We have
earnings per share (eps) measure into astrong history of setting stretching
the long term incentive plan (LTIP), performance targets on the STIP
which excludes the performance andthis will continue.
REMUNERATION REPORT
Annual statement by the Remuneration committee chairman
We considered these suggestions The range itself varies each year, The 201316 LTIP target range was
andconcluded that: takinginto account the risks and setwhen the profit in the Sugar
opportunities facing the business. businesswas 435m. With the
phasing in a longer eps cycle would
subsequent fall in world and European
be problematic as there is no clearly As outlined above, we are adopting
sugar prices, the profit of our Sugar
defined fixed length of sugar cycle twoperformance measures for the LTIP
business has decreased to 34m
and, at the outset, judgement would as Sugar profitability has been more
thisyear. In this context, delivering
be required to determine whether volatile than that of our other businesses.
significant eps growth over the
toinclude historic performance When setting the LTIP targets, the
performance period has been
orbuild up the average from committee conducts an analysis of the
challenging. As a result, no shares
thatpoint; challenges and growth opportunities
willvest to executive directors under
facing each of the divisions over the
in our decentralised model, theLTIP this year. This pattern could
performance period. Target eps ranges
long-term qualitative strategic berepeated for 2016/17 hence our
are tested to ensure that they are
metrics are more appropriately proposal to treat Sugar, in part,
sufficiently stretching.
usedto incentivise divisional separately for future incentives.
management; and We are in a period of exceptional
I trust that this provides a
economic uncertainty in the post
making awards in the form helpfuloverview of the work of
EUreferendum environment and our
ofshares gives absolute TSR thecommitteethis year and the
performance ranges for the 201619
alignment without the challenges decisionsit has made. We trust that
LTIPcycle will reflect this. The eps target
ofa relative TSR measure when youwill support our remuneration
range with Sugar removed is wider
there are no truly comparable policy whichwe firmly believe
this year than we would expect it to be
companies against which to balancestheneed to be fair and
in future asa result of the volatility in
measure ourselves. provide appropriate reward with the
foreign exchange rates and the risks
over-arching requirement to ensure
We also considered the use of andopportunities facing our portfolio
alignment with shareholder interests.
restricted shares (i.e. a share allocation ofnon-Sugar businesses. The ranges
that vests after a certain time without and targets with Sugar in and Sugar out Charles Sinclair
any performance conditions applying) are very similar this year, reflecting the Remuneration committee chairman
but concluded that for such senior above and the operating profit of Sugar
rolesin our organisation, performance in2015/16. We would not normally
related targets as set out in our expectthis to be the case.
policyare more appropriate. Our
2015/16 performance
discussions with shareholders noted
and incentive outcomes
the importance of setting stretching
Our performance expectations
performance targets and acknowledged
atthestart of 2015/16 were for a
that we are an organisation that seeks
modestdecline in adjusted eps.
to drive long-term performance.
Thiswas taken into account when
Taking into account all of the setting the STIP adjusted operating
feedbackreceived, some of which profittargets, which were intended
wascontradictory, we determined todrive the best performance
thatthe proposed approach to outcomesfor our investors over
incentives is aligned with shareholder the year.
interests and is appropriate.
The actual adjusted eps for the year
Performance targets wasbetter than expected benefiting
In setting our incentive targets from the delivery of substantial cost
wehaveregard to the performance reduction and efficiency improvements
potential of the different parts of ina number of businesses but
thebusiness and of the whole. particularly in Sugar; a further profit
Theon-target performance level recovery in Ingredients; an excellent
forSTIP is set at the start of each performance in Primark where the
financial year and is at, or close to, impact on garment purchases of
thebudgeted level of performance. lastyears euro devaluation against
Thecommittee then sets a range theUSdollar was heavily mitigated
around the target to both incentivise bygoodbuying and tight stock
deliveryof a stretching performance and management; and a benefit from the
allow for limited under performance due translation of overseas results into
to events beyond management control. sterling following its substantial
weakening against most of our
tradingcurrencies during the year.
This report
This report sets out:
the remuneration policy that, if approved, will apply to executive and non-executive directors from the date of the 2016 AGM;
how the existing policy, approved in 2014, was implemented;
the amounts earned by our executive and non-executive directors in the year ended 17 September 2016; and
how we expect to implement the proposed remuneration policy.
The Directors remuneration policy (set out on pages 75 to 81) will be subject to a binding vote at the 2016 AGM of the Company.
The committee chairmans letter, this introduction and the annual implementation report on directors remuneration (set out on
pages 82 to 87) willbe subject to an advisory vote at the 2016 AGM of the Company. The vote will have advisory status in
respect of overall remuneration packages and will not be specific to individual levels of remuneration.
Compliance
Where information in this report has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP it has been clearly indicated. The report has been
prepared in line with the recommendations of the UK Corporate Governance Code and the requirements of the UKLA Listing Rules.
Role of the Remuneration committee
Governance
The committee is responsible to the board for determining:
the remuneration policy for the executive directors and the Chairman taking into account remuneration trends across the Company;
the specific terms and conditions of employment of each individual director;
the overall policy for remuneration for the Chief Executives first and second line reports;
the design and monitoring of the operation of any Company share plans;
stretching incentive targets for executive directors to encourage enhanced performance;
an approach that rewards fairly and responsibly contribution to the Companys long-term success; and
other provisions of the executive directors service agreements and ensuring that contractual terms, and payments made,
ontermination are fair to the individual and the Company and that failure is not rewarded and loss is mitigated.
The committees remit is set out in detail in its terms of reference, which are reviewed regularly and were last updated in
September 2015. They are available at www.abf.co.uk/investorrelations, or from the Company Secretarys office on request.
Members of the Remuneration committee
The committee comprises the Chairman, who was independent on appointment, and the following members, all of whom
areindependent non-executive directors:
Role on committee Independence Year of appointment Meetings attended
Charles Sinclair Chairman Chairman4 2008 6/6
Tim Clarke Member Senior Independent Director 2004 6/6
Lord Jay1 Member Independent Director 2006 1/1
Peter Smith2 Member Independent Director 2007 2/3
Javier Ferrn Member Independent Director 2006 6/6
Ruth Cairnie Member Independent Director 2014 6/6
Wolfhart Hauser Member Independent Director 2015 6/6
Richard Reid3 Member Independent Director 2016 3/3
1
Lord Jay retired in November 2015 and attended the one meeting held before his retirement.
2
Peter Smith retired in April 2016 and attended two of the three meetings held before that date.
3
Richard Reid joined the board on 14 April 2016.
4
The Chairman was appointed Chairman of the Remuneration committee as he had the greatest prior experience of executive reward of any
of the non-executive directors. The Chairman ensures that all board members are kept informed of the remuneration setting process.
George Weston (Chief Executive), Des Pullen (Group HR Director) and Julie Withnall (Group Head of Reward) attended all
of the meetings of the committee. No individual was present when their own remuneration was being considered.
Remuneration committee advisors and fees
Following a competitive tender in 2003, Willis Towers Watson (WTW, then Towers Perrin) was selected to provide independent
advice to the committee. The committee has retained WTW in this role because it values the robust data and continuity of advice
provided over the long term. The fourth recommendation of ERWG is that the committee should regularly put their remuneration
advice out to tender. The committee remains satisfied that the advice from WTW is independent, thoughtful and challenging
andsohas not put this out to tender. The committee will keep this position under review.
WTW is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and adheres to its code in relation to executive remuneration consulting.
The only other advice that WTW provides to the Company is in survey provision and remuneration benchmarking. The fees paid
to WTW for committee assistance over the past financial year totalled 105,852.
REMUNERATION REPORT
LTIP Cycle 200609 200710 200811 200912 201013 201114 201215 201316
Vesting as % of maximum 0% 99% 84% 100% 100% 100% 19% 0%
The exceptional performance in 2012 to 2014 reflected steady growth in our foods business, outstanding performance by Primark
and a Sugar performance that benefited from exceptionally high sugar prices. Primarks contribution to the results in these years
meant that we would have been at, or very close to, maximum vesting in this period even without the sugar impact. However,
the level of profit in the Sugar business inflated the starting point for eps targets set at the end of 2012, 2013 and 2014 and the
subsequent sugar price declines substantially reduced, or removed entirely, any chance of long-term incentive targets being
achieved over the following three years.
We do not intend to make any changes to the LTIP target ranges that have already been set but we believe it is in the interests
ofall our investors for us to address the volatility in incentive outcomes for future allocations.
Our Sugar business has delivered an acceptable average return on capital employed (ROCE) for a number of years and is a
stronggenerator of cash. Its financial performance is, however, affected by agricultural influences which can result in price and
often profit volatility, despite its focus on being a very efficient sugar producer. This has informed our proposals on incentive
design for the future. In particular, it has led us to conclude that we should operate a split eps measure, part of which will
excludethe impact of Sugar, and to adjust the outcome of the LTIP downwards if average ROCE for the year is unacceptable.
Remuneration principles
Our review of incentives has taken into account our portfolio model, our market positioning for executive remuneration and our
remuneration principles.
ALIGNMENT, Our board is accountable for ensuring that the portfolio that we operate is the right one to
deliver optimalreturns to shareholders and for ascertaining that the businesses are well run.
ACCOUNTABILITY AND Our remuneration policy aims to align executive rewards with shareholder value creation.
DOING THE RIGHT THING
LINE OF SIGHT We aim to align remuneration and business objectives through performance measures
to which individuals have line of sight.
CLARITY AND SIMPLICITY We believe that executive pay should be clear and simple for participants to understand.
The best way to achieve this is through alignment with business performance.
FAIRNESS Total remuneration should fairly reflect the performance delivered and efforts made
by executives.
% of base Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5
Performance Deferral
Release of shares (subject to malus/clawback).
Deferred award Financial Disclosure of performance range that applied to STIP.
Absolute TSR alignment
As above 50%
Governance
Performance Release of
LTIP adjusted EPS excluding Holding
Vests at end of year 3 shares (subject
Sugar x downwards adjustment
to malus/
based on three-year average Absolute TSR alignment
ROCE excluding Sugar (0.8 to 1x) 120%1 clawback).
Performance Release of
Holding shares (subject
LTIP adjusted EPS x downwards Vests at end of year 3
to malus/
adjustment based on three-year Absolute TSR alignment
average ROCE (0.8 to 1x) 80%1 clawback).
Weighting shown applies for 201619 but may change each year.
1
Alignment to strategy
Our remuneration structure is directly aligned with our strategic goals so that pay supports what we are trying to achieve.
The corporate centre We manage our balance The corporate centre We manage the business We look for long-term
agrees strategy and sheet to deliver long- provides selected for the long term. opportunities to invest
budgets with our termfinancial stability. services and value inthe business.
In the short term we
businesses and closely We ensure capital addingcapabilities
maymake decisions that We are committed to
monitors performance. funding is available to all tothebusinesses.
reduce profit or increase increasing shareholder
Operational decisions of our businesses where
Retention of the working capital. This value through sound
aremade locally. The returns meet/exceed
individuals with these impacts STIP outcomes. commercial responsibility
corporate centre creates defined criteria.
keyskills at the centre and sustainable business
the framework for The new deferred
The robust management iscritical to our success. decisions that deliver
leaders to have freedom awardsmean that making
of the balance sheet steady growth in
in decision-making and STIP and LTIP the right decisions in the
ensures that we are earnings and dividends.
ensures activities are performance measures short term will deliver
ableto deliver a strong
supported and monitored. under the new policy value through share The STIP deferred awards
performance.
should ensure that pricegrowth in the andLTIP shares will
The STIP personal
The LTIP EPS and ROCE outcomes are linked with following years. benefit from a dividend
targets for executive
targets hold executives successful performance equivalent, paid at vesting.
directors are aligned with We will disclose the
to account for the outcomes resulting from This gives closer TSR
the above. The ROCE STIPperformance range
performance outcomes management effort. alignment. The number
and EPS measures on when the deferred
oftheir investment of shares vesting will
the LTIP will be achieved awards vest. We will
decisions. reflect theoutcomes of
if the divisions deliver then be in a position to
the decisions made in
ontheir strategies. describe the short-term
the performance period.
outcome in the context
ofits long-term impact.
REMUNERATION REPORT
Pension No change to current pension arrangements for existing executive directors who have benefits under
Approach is unchanged the Companys defined benefit scheme and/or Employer Financed Retirement Benefit Scheme
(EFRBS), which deliver aretirement benefit target of around two-thirds of final pensionable salary at
normal retirement age.
Future executive directors who are not already entitled to our defined benefit pension atthetime
ofappointment would benefit from a defined contribution arrangement withaCompany contribution
(orcash equivalent) of 25% of salary.
Shareholding requirement Shareholding target of 250% of salary for the CEO and Finance Director to be met using beneficially
Proposed increase owned shares. Conditional share awards, including deferred awards, do not count towards this limit as
shown on page 84. Shares that have vested and are subject to a holding period do count towards this limit.
Governance
role, recognising responsibility
for setting and delivering inrole scope, remuneration will be adjusted to reflect this.
thestrategy.
REMUNERATION REPORT
Governance
To attract and retain a and technical skills required to make a valuable contribution to an effective board. Fees are paid in
high-calibre chairman and cashon aquarterly basis and are not varied for the number of days worked. Non-executive directors
non-executives by providing receive no other benefits and take no partin any discussion concerning their own fees.
acompetitive core reward The Senior Independent Director and committee chairmen are each paid an additional feeto reflect
forthe role. their extra responsibilities and greater time commitment. As the chair of the Remuneration committee
and the Nomination committee is currently the Company Chairman, no fee is paid for these roles
atpresent.
Chairman
The Remuneration committee (under the chairmanship of theSenior Independent Director) reviews
theChairmans fees, whichare paid monthly. In addition to his fee, the Chairman also receives private
medical insurance for himself and his spouse.
Shareholding new this year
We encourage our non-executive directors to build up a shareholding of at least 100% of their
annualfee.
Expenses
We reimburse reasonable expenses incurred in travelling on behalfof the business. As HMRC
regardstravel to the head officeas a benefit in kind, we pay any tax due on such expenses on
agrossed up basis.
REMUNERATION REPORT
Overall As we may need to recruit future executive directors from outside the UK or from companies with
moreaggressive incentive policies than our own, the arrangements below are intended to provide
thenecessary flexibility to recruit the right individuals.
For internal appointments, awards in respect of the prior role may be allowed to vest according to
theterms of the scheme, adjusted as relevant to take account of the new appointment. In addition,
ongoing prior remuneration obligations may continue.
The rationale for the package offered will be explained in the subsequent annual implementation report.
Unlike our previous policy, our new approach applies the same remuneration policy for new joiners
asfor existing executive directors.
Salary Salary would be set at an appropriate level to recruit the best candidate, based on their skills,
experience and current remuneration, taking into account market data and internal salary relativities.
Relocation If a new executive director needs to relocate, the Company may pay:
Governance
actual relocation costs and other reasonable expenses relating to moving house;
disturbance allowance of up to 5% of salary, some of which may be tax-free for qualifying expenditure;
school fees for dependent children where there are cultural or language considerations;
medical costs for the overseas family, where relevant;
one business class return fare per annum each for the executive, his/her partner and dependent
children in order to maintain family or other links where an executive is recruited from outside the UK;
reasonable fees and taxes for buying and/or selling a family home and/or appropriate rental costs; and
any tax due, grossed up, on any relocation related payments listed above.
Buy-out awards In addition to normal incentive awards, buy-out awards may be made to reflect value forfeited through
anindividual leaving their current employer. If a buy-out award is required, the committee would aim
toreflect the nature, timing and value of awards foregone in any replacement awards. Awards may
bemade in cash or shares. Where performance conditions applied to the forfeited award, they will be
applied to the replacement award.
In establishing the appropriate value of any buy-out, the committee would also have regard to the value
ofthe other elements of the new remuneration package. The committee would aim to minimise the
cost to the Company, however, buy-out awards are not subject to a formal maximum. Any awards
would be broadly no more valuable than those being replaced.
Where possible, we would specify that 50% of any vested buy-out awards should be retained until
theshareholding requirement is met.
Other elements Benefits, Pension, STIP, deferred awards, LTIP and share ownership requirements will operate in line
with the remuneration policy.
REMUNERATION REPORT
Non-executives Appointment is for three years unless terminated by either party on six months notice. Continuation of
Contractual termination the appointment is contingent on satisfactory performance and re-election at annual general meetings.
payments Non-executive directors are typically expected to serve two three-year terms, although the board may
invite them to serve for an additional period.
Our Articles of Association require that all directors retire from office if they have not retired at either
ofthe preceding two annual general meetings. In any event, at this years annual general meeting,
alldirectors are standing for election or re-election in compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code.
Where an individual retires at the annual general meeting and does not stand for re-election, they are
not paid in lieu of notice.
* Good leavers are those leaving by reason of ill health/injury/disability/death, redundancy, retirement or because their employing company is being transferred
outside the group or for any other reason determined by the committee.
Governance
6,000 36% 6,000
5,000 5,000
27%
3,000 3,000
7%
27% 9%
22%
26%
10%
2,000 3% 2,000 7%
6% 21%
100% 81% 43% 28%
10%
2% 6%
100% 82% 45% 30%
1,000 1,000
Fixed elements Annual variable element (STIP cash) Fixed elements Annual variable element (STIP cash)
Annual variable element (Deferred awards) Long-term variable element (LTIP shares) Annual variable element (Deferred awards) Long-term variable element (LTIP shares)
Notes 2016/17 Policy:
1
Fixed elements for George Weston comprise salary of 1,044,765, benefits of 16,000 and pension of 608,775 and applies to minimum, threshold,
on-target andmaximum performance.
2
Fixed elements for John Bason comprise salary of 680,265, benefits of 21,000 and pension of 505,865 and applies to minimum, threshold, on-target
andmaximumperformance.
3
STIP cash bonus is calculated on base salary at the end of the financial year and both the deferred awards and LTIP share values are calculated
onbasesalaryatthe date of allocation and exclude share price movement and dividend equivalents.
4
Minimum:
No STIP, deferred awards or LTIP payment for failure to achieve threshold performance.
5
Threshold:
STIP cash of 12% of base salary (12% of base salary for threshold financial performance and 0% for failure to achieve threshold personal performance).
Deferred awards vesting at 10% of maximum (i.e. 5% of grant date base salary).
LTIP vesting at 10% of maximum (i.e. 20% of grant date base salary) following achievement of threshold performance targets.
6
On-target:
STIP cash of 78.3% of base salary (65% for target financial performance and 13.3% for target personal performance).
Deferred awards vesting at 50% of maximum (i.e. 25% of grant date base salary).
LTIP vesting at 50% of maximum (i.e. 100% of grant date base salary).
7
Maximum:
STIP cash of 150% of base salary (130% for maximum financial performance and 20% for achieving maximum personal performance).
Deferred awards vesting at 100% of maximum (i.e. 50% of grant date base salary).
LTIP vesting at 100% of maximum (i.e 200% of salary).
REMUNERATION REPORT
Additional notes to the single total figure of remuneration executive directors (audited information)
Single total figure base salary
Executive directors salaries were reviewed on 1 December 2015 in accordance with normal policy and were increased in line
with average increases for the Companys UK-based employees.
Pensions
Both directors opted out of the Associated British Foods Pension Scheme, a defined benefit scheme, on 5 April 2006,
andsincethen have earned benefits in an EFRBS.
George Weston
George Weston has an overall benefit promise of a minimum of 2 /3rds of final pay or 1/45th of final pensionable earnings for each year
ofpensionable service. He opted out of the Associated British Foods Pension Scheme on 5 April 2006 and has a deferred benefit in the
Scheme; the balance of the promise is provided under an EFRBS. His pension benefits are payable from age 65. There is noadditional
benefit entitlement for members if they take early retirement. His accrued pension at 17 September 2016 was 548,225.
John Bason
John Bason has an overall benefit promise of a minimum of 2 /3rds of final pay or 1/45th of final pensionable earnings for each year
ofpensionable service, less an allowance for retained benefits from his previous employment. He opted out of the Associated British
Foods Pension Scheme on 5 April 2006 and has a deferred benefit in the Scheme; the balance of the promise is provided under an
EFRBS. His pension benefits are payable from age 62. There is no additional benefit entitlement for members if they take early
retirement. His accrued pension at 17 September 2016 was 340,576.
Governance
Measures Achievements against performance measures
108.3%
A Operating profit 15.0 108.3
x 1.0759
B Working capital as % of sales 0.8 1.2
116.56%
A x B Total financial 12 130
13.61%
C Personal George Weston
20%
C Personal John Bason 0 20
130.17%
(A x B) + C Total STIP George Weston
136.56%
(A x B) + C Total STIP John Bason 12 150
The committee considered whether it would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to disclose the precise
targets agreed for each of the performance measures for 2015/16. Their conclusion was that retrospective detail on financial
targets set will not be disclosed at this stage. In future we will disclose the target ranges that apply to STIP when the deferred
awards are released two years from the end of the performance period. We expect that the directors will make the right
decisions for the long-term performance of the business, even if this reduces their incentive pay-out under the STIP. When we
disclose the performance range that applied to the STIP, we wish to be able to add any commentary that will help investors
tounderstand the performance. In most cases, this is not appropriate immediately following the end of the year and remains
commercially sensitive. For these reasons, we believe that this delayed disclosure is appropriate. A discussion of performance
against financial targets for STIP 2015/16 can be found on page 70.
Following a review of personal performance against specific objectives for the 2015/16 financial year, the committee determined
thatGeorge Weston will receive 13.61% of salary in relation to performance that was on-target against set objectives, with cost
reduction and efficiency improvements in a number of businesses but especially in Sugar, a further profit improvement in
Ingredients and an excellent performance in Primark. John Bason will receive 20% of base salary for the individual element
oftheannual bonus, reflecting a very strong overall performance, delivering positive outcomes on a number of important
transactions. Personal objectives set for each of the executive directors were closely aligned to the overall strategyofthe
groupbut additional details will not be disclosed because of commercial sensitivity.
Long-Term Incentive Plan 201316
The performance measures for each three-year LTIP cycle are set by the committee. Awards are made annually, at the discretion
ofthe committee, and eligible executives receive shares at the end of the performance period, subject to achievement of the
performance measures. For the 201316 cycle the adjusted eps performance range was 113.6p for threshold vesting, 123.6p
fortarget vesting and 134.2p for maximum vesting.
Actual eps was 106.2p. In November 2016 executive directors will therefore receive no shares.
REMUNERATION REPORT
As disclosed in the annual report and the Remuneration committee chairmans letter last year, the Company was forecasting
amodest decline in eps for 2015/16. Taking this into account together with volatility in currency markets and uncertainty of
Sugarprofitability as the 2017 reform of the EU sugar regime approaches, the committee determined that the eps performance
range for the 2015-18 award should be 112.5p for threshold vesting, 119p for target vesting and 125.7p for maximum vesting.
Thecommittee believed that this range was extremely stretching. In setting this target, the committee also took into account:
the volatility present in many of the non-sugar markets in which the group operates;
the scale of investment made in the pursuit of long-term growth;
the results of the long-term incentives to date;
market expectations;
internal forecasts for the next few years; and
advice from their appointed remuneration advisors.
As outlined in the remuneration policy, there will be a further two-year holding period in place for the net of tax shares after vesting.
Executive directors shareholding requirements and share interests (audited information)
Under our new remuneration policy, the executive directors are required to build up a beneficially owned shareholding of 250%
ofsalary. This requirement has been met. The interests below remained the same at 8 November 2016.
The awards, in the preceding and following tables are conditional allocations under the LTIP described in the policy section of last years Remuneration report.
2
George Weston is a director of Wittington Investments Limited which, together with its subsidiary, Howard Investments Limited, held 431,515,108 ordinary
3
In addition to the interests granted in the year, the executive directors have the following conditional interests in ABF shares.
Governance
1
Emma Adamo is a director of Wittington Investments Limited which, together with its subsidiary, Howard Investments Limited, held 431,515,108
ordinaryshares in Associated British Foods plc as at 17 September 2016.
2
Wolfhart Hauser was appointed a director on 14 January 2015.
3
Richard Reid was appointed a director on 14 April 2016.
4
Calculated using share price as at 17 September 2016 of 2711p and fee rate as at 17 September 2016.
450
400 ABF
350 411
300
250
200
150 FTSE 100
189
100
50
0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Source: DataStream Return Index
At close of business on 16 September 2016, the last trading day before the end of the financial year, the market value of the
Companys ordinary shares was 2711p. During the previous 12 months, the market value ranged from 2350p to 3599p.
REMUNERATION REPORT
2016 2015
Expenditure m m Change
Pay spend for the group 2,208 2,058 +7%
Dividends relating to the period 290 277 +5%
Taxes paid 211 230 -8%
Dec 2015 Increase in Dec 2016 Increase in Dec 2016 Dec 2016
George Weston 1,051,000 2.0% 21,000 1,072,000
John Bason 692,200 2.0% 13,800 706,000
Modification to
Payout based payout based Overall
on operating on average financial Personal
profit only working capital payout element Total bonus
Maximum 108.3% x1.2 130% 20.0% 150.0%
On-target (budget) 65.0% x1.0 65% 13.3% 78.3%
+ =
Threshold 15.0% x0.8 12% 0.0% 12.0%
Below threshold 0.0% x0.8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
As detailed in our remuneration policy, we believe that the targets used for our 2016/17 STIP are commercially sensitive but are
set at a stretching level. Achievement against financial targets will be disclosed retrospectively in our 2017 Remuneration report
as we have done in this report for 2015/16. In addition, when the shares element is released, we will disclose the related target
range.
Deferred Awards (Shares) 201619
The STIP Shares element will be operated in line with the remuneration policy. Performance will be measured using the
financialperformance target range that applies to the cash element.
When setting the above ranges, the committee conducted an analysis of the growth potential and challenges facing each
ofthedivisions over the performance period. These ranges were then tested to ensure that they were sufficiently stretching.
Weare ina period of exceptional economic uncertainty in the post EU referendum environment and the above ranges reflect
this.Theproposed eps range for the Company as a whole takes into account the operating profit of Sugar in 2015/16. The eps
Governance
range with Sugar removed is wider this year than we would expect it to be in future as a result of the volatility in foreign exchange
ratesandthe risks and opportunities facing our portfolio of non-Sugar businesses. The ranges and targets with Sugar in and
Sugarout are very similar this year; we would not usually expect this to be the case.
Service contracts
Date of current contract/ Unexpired period of
Date of appointment letter of appointment Notice from Company Notice from individual service contract
Executive directors
George Weston 19.04.99 01.06.05 12 months 12 months Rolling contract
John Bason 04.05.99 16.03.99 12 months 12 months Rolling contract
Non-executive directors
Charles Sinclair 01.10.08 21.04.09 6 months 6 months Rolling contract
Tim Clarke 03.11.04 03.11.04 6 months 6 months Rolling contract
Javier Ferrn 01.11.06 01.11.06 6 months 6 months Rolling contract
Emma Adamo 09.12.11 09.12.11 6 months 6 months Rolling contract
Ruth Cairnie 01.05.14 01.05.14 6 months 6 months Rolling contract
Wolfhart Hauser 14.01.15 14.01.15 6 months 6 months Rolling contract
Richard Reid 14.04.16 13.04.16 6 months 6 months Rolling contract
Lord Jay 01.11.06 Lord Jay has now retired as a non-executive director
Peter Smith 28.02.07 Peter Smith has now retired as a non-executive director
Copies of service contracts are available for inspection at the Companys head office.
Non-executive directors fees for 2016/17
Increase in
Dec 2015 Dec 2016 Dec 2016
Chairman 390,000 20,000 410,000
Senior Independent Director 92,500 2,500 95,000
Chairman of Audit committee 92,500 2,500 95,000
Director 72,500 1,500 74,000
Non-executive directors fees will be revised as shown above in December 2016. The next review of fees will be in 2018.
Statement on shareholder voting
At the last AGM in December 2015 the voting results on resolution two, to receive and approve the Remuneration report
fortheyear ended 12 September 2015, were as follows:
(i) the total number of votes cast in relation to the resolution was 664,298,880: 605,111,819 for and 59,187,061 against
(ii) the percentage for was 91.09% and the percentage against was 8.91%
(iii) the number of abstentions was 8,793,188
By order of the board
Paul Lister
Company Secretary
8 November 2016
DIRECTORS REPORT
Introduction prior to the relevant meeting by at least ofitsemployees and those who work
The directors of Associated British Foods two members of the Company. The withit. It also wants employees to have
plc (the Company) present their report Articles require directors to retire and opportunities to grow and progress as part
for the 53 weeks ended 17 September submit themselves for election at of an enjoyable career. While the groups
2016, in accordance with section 415 of thefirst AGM following appointment approach to human resource management
the Companies Act 2006. The UKLAs andalldirectors who held office at the is decentralised, with flexibility given
Disclosure and Transparency Rules and time of the two preceding AGMs and, toeach of the businesses, as a group
Listing Rules also require the Company inany event, not less than one-third itabides by the following principles:
to make certain disclosures, some ofthe relevant directors (excluding
equal opportunities the group
ofwhich have been included in other thosedirectors who retire other than
iscommitted to offering equal
appropriate sections of the annual byrotation), to submit themselves for
opportunities in recruitment, training,
reportand accounts. re-election. The Articles notwithstanding,
career development and promotion
all directors will stand for election or
The information set out on page 91 and toall people, including those with
re-election at the AGM this year in
the following cross-referenced material, disabilities, having regard for their
compliance with the UK Corporate
is incorporated into this directors report: particular aptitudes and abilities.
Governance Code. Details of unexpired
Asamatter of policy, full and fair
likely future developments in the terms of directors service contracts
consideration is given to applicants
groups business (pages 12 to 41); areset out in the Remuneration report
with disabilities and every effort
on page 87.
greenhouse gas emissions (page 46); ismade to give employees who
and Power of directors become disabled whilst employed
The directors are responsible for bythe group an opportunity for
the board of directors and the
managing the business of the Company retraining and for continuation in
corporate governance report
and may exercise all the powers of the employment. It is group policy that
(pages54 to 68).
Company subject to the provisions of the training, career development
Results and dividends relevant statutes, to any directions andpromotion of disabled persons
The consolidated income statement givenby special resolution and to the should, as far as possible, be the
ison page 98. Profit for the financial year Companys Articles. The Articles, for same as that of other employees;
attributable to equity shareholders example, contain specific provisions and
health and safety health and safety
amounted to 818m. restrictions concerning the Companys
are considered as equal in importance
power to borrow money. Powers relating
The directors recommend a final dividend to that of any other function of the
to the issuing of shares are also included
of 26.45p per ordinary share to be paid, group and its business objectives and
in the Articles and such authorities are
subject to shareholder approval, on the group is committed to providing a
renewed by shareholders at the AGM
13January 2017. Together with the safe and healthy workplace to protect
each year.
interim dividend of 10.3p per share paid all employees, visitors and the public
on 1July2016, this amounts to 36.75p Directors indemnities from foreseeable work hazards. The
forthe year. Dividends are detailed Three directors of operating subsidiaries, health and safety policy is available
onpage 114. benefited from qualifying third-party on the Companys website at
indemnity provisions provided by the www.abf.co.uk;
Directors
Companys wholly-owned subsidiary,
The names of the persons who were harassment sexual, mental or
ABF Investments plc, during the financial
directors of the Company during the physical harassment in the workplace
year and at the date of this report.
financial year and as at 8 November 2016 will not be tolerated. It is expected
appear on pages 54 and 55, with the The directors of a subsidiary company that incidents of harassment are
exception of Lord Jay and Peter Smith that acts as trustee of a pension scheme reported to the appropriate human
who each retired as a non-executive benefited from a qualifying pension resources director;
director on 30 November 2015 and 13April scheme indemnity provision during the
human rights the group provides
2016, respectively. All the otherdirectors financial year and at the date of this report.
opportunities that promote human
are standing for election orre-election
Directors share interests rights and dignity every day through
atthis years AGM in December.
Details regarding the share interests of the employment created, both
Appointment of directors the directors (and their persons closely directly and indirectly in its global
The Companys articles of association associated) in the share capital of the supply chains and through the
(the Articles) give the directors power Company, including any interests under positive contribution its products
to appoint and replace directors. Under the long-term incentive plan, are set make to peoples lives. Ongoing
the terms of reference of the Nomination outin the Remuneration report on engagement and collaboration with
committee, any appointment must pages84 and 85. abroad range of interested and
berecommended by the Nomination concerned stakeholder groups is
Employees
committee for approval by the board valued and Associated British Foods
During the year under review, the group
ofdirectors. A person who is not isactive in its collaborative approach,
employed an average of 129,916 people
recommended by the directors may seeking to remain sensitive to
worldwide (2015124,036) of whom
onlybe appointed as a director where therisks of adverse human rights
43,954 were employed in the UK. The
details of that director have been provided impacts resulting from its products,
groups business priority is to safeguard
at least seven and not more than 35 days services and operations. While
the wellbeing, development and safety
respecting all human rights throughout bedisclosed by that section, where Weston and Emma Adamo) are, under
the business, six priority areas of applicable to the Company, can be the Listing Rules, treated as acting in
focus to mitigate risk have been located in the annual report and accounts concert with Wittington and the trustees
highlighted, namely: workplace safety; at the references set out below. of the Foundation and are therefore also
gender and diversity; slavery and treated as controlling shareholders of the
human trafficking; supply chain; use Location in Company. Wittington, the trustees of the
Information required annual report
of commodities; and access to water. Foundation and these individuals together
(12) Shareholder
It is, however, acknowledged that comprise the controlling shareholders of
waiver of dividends Note 23 on page 130
these may change over time due to the Company and, at 17 September 2016,
(13) Shareholder waiver
the constantly evolving nature of the of future dividends Note 23 on page 130
had a combined interest in approximately
businesses and environments in (14) Board statement
59.16% of the Companys voting rights.
which the group operates. Further on relationship The board confirms that, in accordance
details on the groups approach to agreement with Directors report with the Listing Rules, on 14 November
human rights can be found in the controlling shareholder onpage 89
2014 the Company entered into a
2016 Corporate Responsibility
Paragraphs (1), (2), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), relationship agreement with Wittington
Reportand our Modern Slavery
(10) and (11) of Listing Rule 9.8.4R are and the trustees of the Foundation
Actstatement which is available
not applicable. containing the required undertakings
onthe Companys website at
Governance
(theRelationship Agreement). Under
www.abf.co.uk/responsibility; Relationship agreement with the terms of the Relationship Agreement,
communication employees and controlling shareholders Wittington has agreed to procure
their representatives are briefed and Any person who exercises or controls, compliance with the undertakings by
consulted on all relevant matters on on their own or together with any person theother individuals who are treated
aregular basis in order to take their with whom they are acting in concert, ascontrolling shareholders (the
views into account with regard to 30% or more of the votes able to be Non-signing Controlling Shareholders).
decision-making and to achieve castat general meetings of a company The board confirms that, during the
acommon awareness of all the are known as a controlling shareholder period under review:
financial and economic factors under the Listing Rules. The Listing
Rules require companies with controlling the Company has complied with the
affecting the performance of the
shareholders to enter into an agreement independence provisions included
group. Information relevant to
which is intended to ensure that the inthe Relationship Agreement;
theemployees will be provided
systematically to employees; and controlling shareholders comply with so far as the Company is aware, the
certain independence provisions in the independence provisions included
security the security of our staff and Listing Rules and which must contain inthe Relationship Agreement have
customers is paramount and the group undertakings that: been complied with by the controlling
will at all times take the necessary
transactions and arrangements with shareholders and their associates; and
steps to minimise risks to their safety.
the controlling shareholder (and/or so far as the Company is aware,
Employees are provided with information any of its associates) will be theprocurement obligation included
on the performance of their local business conducted at arms length and on inthe Relationship Agreement
and their involvement is encouraged in normal commercial terms; asregards compliance with the
avariety of ways, such as through
neither the controlling shareholder independence provisions by the
engagement surveys, business forums,
nor any of its associates will take any Non-signing Controlling Shareholders
executive leadership programmes and
action that would have the effect of and their associates, has been
management presentations.
preventing the listed company from complied with by Wittington.
The group encourages an open culture in complying with its obligations under Major interests in shares
all its dealings between employees and the Listing Rules; and As at 17 September 2016, the Company
people with whom it comes into contact.
neither the controlling shareholder had received formal notification, under the
Effective and honest communication is
nor any of its associates will Disclosure and Transparency Rules, of the
essential if malpractice and wrongdoing
proposeor procure the proposal following material interest in itsshares:
are to be dealt with effectively. The
groups whistleblowing procedures set ofashareholder resolution which
% of
out guidelines for individuals who feel isintended or appears to be intended Number issued Date of
they need to raise certain issues in to circumvent the proper application of ordinary share notification
Shareholder shares capital of interest
confidence with the Company or their of the Listing Rules.
The Capital
own business. Every effort is made to Wittington Investments Limited Group
protect the confidentiality of those who (Wittington) and, through their control Companies, 15 July
raise concerns, and employees may come ofWittington, the trustees of the Garfield Inc. 79,392,778 10.03 2016
forward without fear for their position. Weston Foundation (the Foundation) are
controlling shareholders of the Company. No changes in the holdings of 3% or more
Disclosures required under
Certain other individuals, including certain of the voting rights in the Companys
Listing Rule 9.8.4R
members of the Weston family who hold ordinary shares have been notified to the
The following table is included to meet
shares in the Company (and including Company between 18 September 2016
the requirements of Listing Rule section
twoof the Companys directors, George and 2 November 2016.
9.8.4R. The information required to
DIRECTORS REPORT
Governance
financial statements in accordance
withUK Accounting Standards. Responsibility statement
of the directors in respect
Under company law the directors must
of the annual report
not approve the financial statements
We confirm that to the best of
unless they are satisfied that they give
ourknowledge:
atrue and fair view of the state of affairs
of the group and parent company and the financial statements, prepared
oftheir profit or loss for that period. inaccordance with the applicable set
Inpreparing each of the group and of accounting standards, give a true
parent company financial statements, and fair view of the assets, liabilities,
the directors are required to: financial position and profit or loss
ofthe Company and the undertakings
select suitable accounting policies
included in the consolidation taken
and then apply them consistently;
asa whole; and
make judgements and estimates
the Strategic report includes a fair
thatare reasonable and prudent;
review of the development and
for the group financial statements, performance of the business
state whether they have been andtheposition of the Company
prepared in accordance with IFRSs andtheundertakings included
asadopted by the EU; intheconsolidation taken as whole,
together with a description of the
for the parent company financial
principal risks and uncertainties
statements, state whether applicable
thatthey face.
UK Accounting Standards have been
followed, subject to any material We consider the annual report and
departures disclosed and explained financial statements, taken as a whole,
inthe parent company financial isfair, balanced and understandable and
statements; and provides the information necessary for
shareholders to assess the Companys
prepare the financial statements on
position and performance, business
the going concern basis unless it is
model and strategy.
inappropriate to presume that the
group and the parent company will On behalf of the board
continue in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping
adequate accounting records that are Charles Sinclair
sufficient to show and explain the parent Chairman
companys transactions and disclose
with reasonable accuracy at any time the George Weston
financial position of the parent company Chief Executive
and enable them to ensure that its
financial statements comply with the John Bason
Companies Act 2006. They have general Finance Director
responsibility for taking such steps as are
reasonably open to them to safeguard 8 November 2016
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and IFRSs as adopted by the
EU.The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the parent company financial statements
isapplicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice),
includingFRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework.
Overview of our audit approach
Assessment of the carrying value We performed an audit of the complete We used a group materiality of
ofgoodwill, other intangible assets financial information of 125 components 50m, which represents 5%
andproperty, plant and equipment. and audit procedures on specific balances of profit before taxation.
Tax provisions. for a further 60 components.
What we concluded to
Risk Our response to the risk
the Audit committee
Assessment of the carrying value We understood the methodology applied by We agreed with
ofgoodwill, other intangible assets management in performing its impairment test for managements conclusion
andproperty, plant and equipment eachof the relevant CGUs and walked through the that no impairments were
(6,493m, 20155,885m). controls over the process. required, based on the results
The group has a significant value of goodwill, For all CGUs we calculated the degree to which the of our work. Of the groups
other intangible assets and property, plant and keyinputs and assumptions would need to fluctuate goodwill, that relating to the
equipment that has arisen from acquisitions before an impairment was triggered and considered AB Mauri business is most
and capital investments. The AB Mauri thelikelihood of this occurring. We performed our own sensitive to reasonably
(carrying value of 696m), Australian meat sensitivities on the groups forecasts and determined possible changes in key
(156m) and UK bakeries (281m) businesses whether adequate headroom remained. assumptions. Management
all experienced challenging trading has described these
For CGUs where there were indicators of impairment or sensitivities appropriately
environments in recentyears. low levels of headroom, we performed detailed testing inthe Intangible assets
AB Mauris profitability has been impacted tocritically assess and corroborate the key inputs to the noteto the group financial
bycompetitive pricing pressures in some valuations, including: statements, in accordance
ofits businesses compounded by analysing the historical accuracy of budgets to actual with IAS 36.
macroeconomic conditions, including high results to determine whether forecast cash flows are
Governance
inflationrates and currency devaluations. reliable based on past experience;
The Australian meat and UK bakeries for certain CGUs, visiting factories to better understand
businesses operate in environments of the operations and to assess the ability to achieve
significant retailer pressure on price and forecast volume growth, operational improvements
competitor activity. andproduction yields;
There is a risk that these cash generating corroborating the discount rate used by obtaining
units (CGUs) may not achieve the anticipated theunderlying data used in the calculation and
business performance to support their benchmarking it against market data and
carrying value, leading to an impairment comparableorganisations; and
charge that has not been recognised
bymanagement. validating the growth rates assumed by comparing
them to economic and industry forecasts.
Significant judgement is required in forecasting
the future cash flows of each CGU, together We assessed the disclosures in note 8 against the
with the rate at which they are discounted. requirements of IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, in
particular in respect of the requirement to disclose
Refer to the Audit committee report further sensitivities for CGUs where a reasonably
(page66); accounting policies (pages 105 and possible change in a key assumption would cause
106); accounting estimates and judgements animpairment.
(page 108); andnotes 8 and 9 to the
consolidated financial statements. For the AB Mauri CGU, the audit procedures performed
to address this risk were performed by the group audit
team. The Australian meat and UK bakeries operating
intangible assets and property, plant and equipment were
subject to full scope audit procedures by the respective
component teams and reviewed by the group audit team.
Tax provisions (included within We understood the groups process for determining We consider the amounts
the income tax liability of 147m, provisions for tax and calculating the tax charge, provided to be within an
2015126m). andwalked through managements controls over acceptable range in the
The global nature of the groups operations taxreporting. context of the groups
results in complexities in the payment of The group audit team, including tax specialists, overalltax exposures.
andaccounting for tax. evaluatedthe tax positions taken by management in
Management applies judgement in assessing eachsignificant jurisdiction in the context of local tax
tax exposures in each jurisdiction, many of law,correspondence with tax authorities and the status
which require interpretation of local tax laws. ofanytax audits. Our work utilised additional support
fromcountry tax specialists in Australia, China,
Given this judgement, there is a risk that Germany,Ireland, Spain and the US.
taxprovisions are misstated.
We assessed the groups transfer pricing judgements,
Refer to the Audit committee report considering the way in which the groups businesses
(page66); accounting policies (page 105); operate and the correspondence and agreements
accounting estimates and judgements (page reached with tax authorities.
108); andnote 5 to the consolidated financial
statements.
What we concluded to
Risk Our response to the risk
the Audit committee
Revenue recognition, including the risk We understood each business revenue recognition Based on the procedures
ofmanagement override (13,399m, policies and how they are applied, including the relevant performed, including those in
201512,800m). controls, and tested controls over revenue recognition respect of trade deductions
There continues to be pressure on the group where appropriate. and rebates in the Grocery
to meet expectations and targets. Management We discussed key contractual arrangements with segment, we did not identify
reward and incentive schemes based on management and obtained relevant documentation, any evidence of material
achieving profit targets may also place including in respect of rebate arrangements. Where misstatement in the revenue
pressure to manipulate revenue recognition. rebate arrangements existed, weobtained third-party recognised in the year.
The majority of the groups sales arrangements confirmations or performed appropriate alternative
are generally straightforward, being on a point procedures, including review of contracts and
of sale basis and requiring little judgement recalculation of rebates. We also performed hindsight
tobeexercised. However, inthe Grocery analysis over changes to prior period rebate estimates
segment, management estimates the level tochallenge the assumptions made, including assessing
oftrade promotions andrebates to be the estimates for evidence of management bias.
appliedtoitssales to customers, adding a For a number of businesses, including Primark, as part of our
level ofjudgement torevenue recognition. overall revenue recognition testing we used data analysis
Approximately 4% ofthe groups gross tools to test the correlation of revenue transactions to cash
revenue is subject to such arrangements. receipts for 100% of sales through the year. This provided us
There is a risk that management may override with a high level of assurance over 8.6bn (64%) of revenue
controls to intentionally misstate revenue recognised. For those in-scope businesses where we did
transactions, either through the judgements not use data analysis tools, we performed appropriate
made in estimating rebates in the Grocery alternative procedures over revenue recognition.
segment or by recording fictitious revenue We performed cut-off testing for a sample of revenue
transactions across the business. transactions around the period end date, to check that
Refer to the accounting policies (page 104); they were recognised in the appropriate period.
andnote 1 to the consolidated financial Other audit procedures specifically designed to address
statements. the risk of management override of controls included
journal entry testing, applying particular focus to the
timing of revenue transactions.
We performed full and specific scope audit procedures
over this risk area in 101 locations, which covered 91%
ofthe groups revenue.
The risks of material misstatement as set out in the table above are consistent with those reported by Associated British Foods plcs
previous external auditor, with the exception of the inclusion in 2016 of revenue recognition, including the risk of management override.
Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality In establishing our overall approach to
and our allocation of performance materiality determine Profit before taxation (%) thegroup audit, we determined the type
our audit scope for each entity within the group. Taken 7 ofwork that needed to be undertaken
together, this enables us to form an opinion on the 6 ateach of the components by us, as
consolidated financial statements. We take into account thegroup audit team, or by component
the level of revenue and profit before taxation, risk profile auditors from other EY global network
(including country risk, controls and internal audit findings firms or other auditors operating under
and the extent of changes in management, systems ourinstruction. Ofthe 125 full scope
andprocesses and the business environment) and components, audit procedures were
otherknown factors when assessing the level of performed on 77 of these directly bythe
worktobe performed at each entity. group audit team and 48 by component
In assessing the risk of material misstatement to the audit teams. For the 60 specific scope
87 components, where the work was
group financial statements and to achieve adequate
quantitative coverage of significant accounts in the performed by component auditors,
financial statements, of the 596 reporting components Revenue (%) wedetermined the appropriate level of
Full scope components
Governance
ofthe group, we selected 185 components, which involvement to enable us to determine
Specific scope components
9 thatsufficient audit evidence had been
represent the principal business units within the group. Other procedures
obtained as a basis for our opinion on
Of the 185 components selected, we performed 10
thegroup as a whole.
anaudit of the complete financial information of 125
components (full scope components) which were During the period the Senior Statutory
selected based ontheir size or risk characteristics. Auditor or other members of the
Forthe remaining 60components (specific scope groupaudit team visited 36 full and
components), we performed audit procedures on specific scope components in the UK,
specific accounts within that component that we Ireland, Australia, the US, Argentina,
considered had the potential for the greatest impact Brazil,China, Italy, Mexico, Poland,
81 South Africa, Spain and Thailand.
onthe significant accounts in the financial statements
either because of the size of these accounts or These visits involved meeting with
theirrisk profile. Total assets
Full scope (%)
components ourcomponent team to discuss and
The reporting components where we performed full Specific scope components directitsaudit approach, reviewing
8 andunderstanding the significant audit
andspecific scope audit procedures accounted for 93% Other procedures
of the groups profit before taxation, 91% of the groups findings in response to the risk areas
16 including asset impairment, tax
revenue and 92% ofthe groups total assets. For the
current period, the fullscope components contributed provisions and revenue recognition,
87% of the groups profit before taxation, 81% of the holding meetings with local management,
groups revenue and76% of the groups total assets. undertaking factory tours and obtaining
The specific scope components contributed 6% of updates on local regulatory matters
thegroups profit beforetaxation, 10% of the groups including tax, pensions and legal. The
revenue and 16% ofthe groups total assets. The audit group audit team interacted regularly
76 with the component teams where
scope of these components may not have included
testing of all significant accounts of the component appropriate during various stages of
butcontributed tothe coverage of significant theaudit, reviewed key working papers
accountstested for thegroup.
Full scope components and were responsible for the scope
Specific scope components anddirection ofthe audit process. This,
Of the remaining 411 components that together Revenue (%)
Other procedures
together with the additional procedures
represent 7% of the groups profit before taxation, performed atgroup level, gave us
9
noneare individually greater than 1.1% of the groups appropriate evidence for our opinion
profit before taxation. For these components, 10 onthe group financial statements.
weperformed other procedures, including analytical
review,testing of consolidation journals and
intercompany eliminations and foreign currency
translation recalculations to respond toany
potentialrisks of material misstatement to the
groupfinancial statements.
Associated British Foods plcs previous external 81
auditorperformed full and specific scope audit
procedures on components accounting for 90%
ofthegroups profit before taxation, 91% of the Full scope components
groupsrevenue and 91% ofthe groups total assets. Specific scope components
The charts illustrate the coverage obtained from Other procedures
Governance
the parent company financial statements and the part of the Remuneration report to be audited are
notinagreement with the accounting records and returns; or
certain disclosures of directors remuneration specified by law are not made; or
we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Statement on the directors assessment of the principal risks that would threaten the solvency or liquidity of the entity
ISAs (UK We are required to give a statement as to whether we have anything material to add or draw attention We have
andIreland) toin relation to: nothing
reporting material
the directors confirmation in the annual report and accounts that they have carried out a robust
assessment of the principal risks facing the entity, including those that would threaten its business model, to add
future performance, solvency or liquidity; or to draw
attention to.
the disclosures in the annual report and accounts that describe those risks and explain how they are being
managed or mitigated;
the directors statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to
adoptthe going concern basis of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material
uncertainties to the entitys ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from
thedate of approval of the financial statements; and
the directors explanation in the annual report and accounts as to how they have assessed the prospects
ofthe entity, over what period they have done so and why they consider that period to be appropriate,
andtheir statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the entity will be able to continue
in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of their assessment, including any
related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.
Andrew Walton
(Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP, Statutory Auditor
London
8 November 2016
2015
2016 (restated1)
Continuing operations Note m m
Revenue 1 13,399 12,800
Operating costs before exceptional item 2 (12,359) (11,821)
Exceptional item 2 (5) (98)
1,035 881
Share of profit after tax from joint ventures and associates 10 57 48
Profits less losses on disposal of non-current assets 11 8
Operating profit 1,103 937
Attributable to
Equity shareholders 818 528
Non-controlling interests 3 (12)
Profit for the period 821 516
Basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share (pence) 7 103.4 66.8
Dividends per share paid and proposed for the period (pence) 6 36.75 35.0
The results of the prior year have been restated to reflect the change of accounting policy for sugar cane roots (see page 106).
1
2015
2016 (restated)
m m
Profit for the period recognised in the income statement 821 516
Other comprehensive income
Remeasurements of defined benefit schemes (258) 27
Deferred tax associated with defined benefit schemes 50 (5)
Current tax associated with defined benefit schemes 1
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss (207) 22
Effect of movements in foreign exchange 610 (444)
Net (loss)/gain on hedge of net investment in foreign subsidiaries (75) 22
Deferred tax associated with movements in foreign exchange 8 2
Current tax associated with movements in foreign exchange 1 1
Reclassification adjustment for movements in foreign exchange on subsidiaries disposed (8)
Movement in cash flow hedging position (13) (56)
Deferred tax associated with movement in cash flow hedging position 4 11
Share of other comprehensive income of joint ventures and associates 16 (2)
Items that are or may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss 551 (474)
Attributable to
Equity shareholders 1,153 151
Non-controlling interests 12 (87)
Total comprehensive income for the period 1,165 64
Financial statements
2015 2014
2016 (restated1) (restated1)
Note m m m
Non-current assets
Intangible assets 8 1,348 1,367 1,467
Property, plant and equipment 9 5,145 4,518 4,701
Investments in joint ventures 10 221 180 180
Investments in associates 10 39 32 32
Employee benefits assets 11 6 125 90
Deferred tax assets 12 139 125 152
Other receivables 13 41 23 164
Total non-current assets 6,939 6,370 6,786
Current assets
Assets classified as held for sale 14 312
Inventories 15 2,033 1,827 1,631
Biological assets 16 86 70 109
Trade and other receivables 13 1,337 1,176 1,293
Derivative assets 25 105 74 74
Income tax 9
Cash and cash equivalents 17 555 702 519
Total current assets 4,437 3,849 3,626
Total assets 11,376 10,219 10,412
Current liabilities
Liabilities classified as held for sale 14 (75)
Loans and overdrafts 18 (245) (319) (358)
Trade and other payables 19 (2,551) (2,226) (2,046)
Derivative liabilities 25 (73) (33) (15)
Income tax (147) (126) (193)
Provisions 20 (54) (38) (72)
Total current liabilities (3,145) (2,742) (2,684)
Non-current liabilities
Loans 18 (640) (577) (607)
Provisions 20 (34) (28) (29)
Deferred tax liabilities 12 (139) (220) (251)
Employee benefits liabilities 11 (296) (141) (133)
Total non-current liabilities (1,109) (966) (1,020)
Total liabilities (4,254) (3,708) (3,704)
Net assets 7,122 6,511 6,708
Equity
Issued capital 21 45 45 45
Other reserves 21 175 175 175
Translation reserve 21 433 (120) 238
Hedging reserve 21 (22) (11) 29
Retained earnings 6,423 6,232 5,933
Total equity attributable to equity shareholders 7,054 6,321 6,420
Non-controlling interests 68 190 288
Total equity 7,122 6,511 6,708
Prior year balances have been restated to reflect the change of accounting policy for sugar cane roots (see page 106).
1
The financial statements on pages 98 to 148 were approved by the board of directors on 8 November 2016 and were signed
on its behalf by:
2015
2016 (restated)
m m
Cash flow from operating activities
Profit before taxation 1,042 707
Profits less losses on disposal of non-current assets (11) (8)
Profits less losses on sale and closure of businesses 14 172
Finance income (6) (8)
Finance expense 56 61
Other financial (income)/expense (3) 5
Share of profit after tax from joint ventures and associates (57) (48)
Amortisation 47 81
Depreciation 439 408
Exceptional item 5 98
Net change in the fair value of current biological assets (12) 16
Share-based payment expense 7 11
Pension costs less contributions 7 6
Increase in inventories (62) (310)
(Increase)/decrease in receivables (55) 10
Increase in payables 107 234
Purchases less sales of current biological assets (2) (2)
Increase/(decrease) in provisions 5 (28)
Cash generated from operations 1,521 1,405
Income taxes paid (211) (230)
Net cash from operating activities 1,310 1,175
Financial statements
Net cash from investing activities (756) (548)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange (restated) (371) (1) (372) (72) (444)
Net gain on hedge of net investment in foreign subsidiaries 22 22 22
Deferred tax associated with movements in foreign exchange 2 2
Current tax associated with movements in foreign exchange 1 1 1
Reclassification adjustment for movements in foreign exchange
on subsidiaries disposed (8) (8) (8)
Movement in cash flow hedging position (49) (49) (7) (56)
Deferred tax associated with movement in cash flow
hedgingposition 10 10 1 11
Share of other comprehensive income of joint ventures
and associates (2) (2) (2)
Items that are or may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss
(restated) (358) (40) (398) (76) (474)
Associated British Foods plc (the The accounting policies set out Subsidiaries are entities controlled
Company) is a company domiciled in belowhave been applied to all bytheCompany. Control exists when
theUnited Kingdom. The consolidated periodspresented, except where the Company has the power, directly
financial statements of the Company detailed otherwise. orindirectly, to direct the activities of
forthe 53 weeks ended 17 September anentity so as to significantly affect
Details of new accounting standards
2016 comprise those of the Company thereturns of that entity.
which came into force in the year are
and its subsidiaries (together referred to
setout at the end of this note. Changes in the groups ownership
as the group) and the groups interest
interest in a subsidiary that do not result
inassociates and joint arrangements. The consolidated financial statements
ina loss of control are accounted for
ofthe group are prepared to the Saturday
The financial statements were within equity.
nearest to 15 September. Accordingly,
authorised for issue by the directors
these financial statements have been All the groups joint arrangements
on8November 2016.
prepared for the 53weeks ended arejoint ventures, which are entities
The consolidated financial statements 17September 2016 (2015 52 weeks overwhose activities the group has joint
have been prepared and approved by the ended 12 September 2015). To avoid delay control, typically established by contractual
directors in accordance with International inthe preparation of the consolidated agreement and requiring theventurers
Financial Reporting Standards as financial statements, theresults of unanimous consent forstrategic financial
adopted by the EU (AdoptedIFRS). certain subsidiaries, jointarrangements and operating decisions.
and associates are included up to
The Company has elected to prepare Associates are those entities in which
31August each year. Theresults of
itsparent company financial statements the group has significant influence, being
Illovoare included for the period to
under Financial Reporting Standard 101 the power to participate in the financial
31August 2016, with Illovos 2015
Reduced Disclosure Framework. These and operating policy decisions of the
results being included to 30 September.
are presented on pages 149 to 156. entity, but which does not amount
Adjustments are made as appropriate
tocontrol or joint control.
Basis of preparation forsignificant transactions or events
The going concern basis has been applied occurring between 17September and Where the groups share of losses
in these accounts. The consolidated these other balance sheet dates. exceeds its interest in a joint venture
financial statements are presented in orassociate, the carrying amount is
The groups business activities,
sterling, rounded to the nearest million. reduced to zero and recognition of
togetherwith the factors likely to affect
They are prepared on the historical further losses is discontinued except
itsfuture development, performance
costbasis except that current biological tothe extent that the group has
andposition are set out in the Strategic
assets and certain financial instruments incurredlegal or constructive
report on pages 6 to 41. The financial
are stated at fair value. Assets classified obligationsor made payments on
position of the group, its cash flows,
as held for sale are stated at the lower behalfof an investee.
liquidity position and borrowing facilities
ofcarrying amount and fair value less
are described inthe Financial review on Control, joint control and significant
Financial statements
costs tosell.
pages 42 and 43. In addition, the Principal influence are generally assessed by
The preparation of financial statements risks and uncertainties on pages 48 to 52 reference to equity shareholdings
under Adopted IFRS requires and note 25 on pages 131 to 140 provide andvoting rights.
management to make judgements, details ofthe groups policy on managing
Business combinations
estimates and assumptions about its financial and commodity risks.
On the acquisition of a business,
thereported amounts of assets and
The group has considerable financial fairvalues are attributed to the
liabilities, income and expenses and
resources, good access to debt markets, identifiable assets, liabilities and
thedisclosure of contingent assets and
a diverse range of businesses and a contingent liabilities acquired, reflecting
liabilities. The estimates and associated
widegeographic spread. It is therefore conditions at the date of acquisition.
assumptions are based on experience.
well placed to manage business Adjustments to fair values include those
Actual results may differ from these
riskssuccessfully. made to bring accounting policies into
estimates. Judgements made by
line with those ofthe group. Provisional
management in the application of Basis of consolidation
fair values arefinalised within 12 months
Adopted IFRS that have a significant The consolidated financial statements
of the business combination date and,
effect on the financial statements, include the results of the Company
where significant, are adjusted by
andestimates with a significant risk andall of its subsidiaries from the date
restatement of the comparative period
ofmaterial adjustment next year, are that control commences to the date
inwhich the acquisition occurred.
discussed in Accounting estimates thatcontrol ceases. The consolidated
Non-controlling interests are measured
andjudgements detailed on page 108. financial statements also include the
atthe proportionate share of the net
groups share of the after-tax results,
The estimates and underlying identifiableassets acquired.
other comprehensive income and net
assumptions are reviewed on a
assets of its joint arrangements and Existing equity interests in the acquiree
regularbasis. Revisions to accounting
associates on an equity-accounted are remeasured to fair value as at the
estimates are recognised from the
basisfrom the point at which joint date of the business combination,
period in which the estimates
controlorsignificant influence withany resulting gain or loss taken
arerevised.
respectively commences, to the tothe incomestatement.
datethat it ceases.
Goodwill arising on a business Borrowing costs Income and expense items are
combination is the excess of the Borrowing costs are accounted for translated into sterling at weighted
remeasured carrying amount of any usingthe effective interest method. average rates of exchange.
existing equity interest plus the fair Thegroup capitalises borrowing costs
Differences arising from the
valueof consideration payable for the directly attributable to the acquisition,
retranslationof opening net assets
additional stake over the fair value of construction or production of
ofgroup companies, together with
theshare ofnet identifiable assets and qualifyingitems of property, plant
differences arising from the restatement
liabilities acquired (including separately andequipment as part of their cost.
ofthe net results of group companies
identified intangible assets), net of Interest capitalised is taxed under
from average rates to rates at the
non-controlling interests. Total currentor deferred tax asappropriate.
balance sheet date, are taken to the
consideration does not include
Exceptional items translation reserve inequity.
acquisition costs, which are expensed
Exceptional items are defined as items
asincurred. Contingent consideration Pensions and other
ofincome and expenditure which are
ismeasured atfair value atthe date post-employment benefits
material and unusual in nature and
ofthe business combination, classified The groups principal pension
whichare considered to be of
asa liability orequity (usually asa schemesare defined benefit plans.
suchsignificance that they require
liability), and subsequently accounted Inaddition thegroup has defined
separatedisclosure on the face
forin line with that classification. contribution plans and other unfunded
oftheincomestatement.
Changes in contingent consideration post-employment liabilities. For defined
classified as a liability resulting other Adjusted profit and benefit plans, theamount charged in
thanfrom the finalisation of provisional earningsmeasures theincome statement is the cost of
fairvalues are accounted for in the Adjusted operating profit is stated benefits accruing to employees over
income statement. beforeamortisation of non-operating theyear, plus any benefit improvements
intangibles, profits less losses on granted tomembers by the group
Revenue
disposal of non-current assets and duringthe year. It also includes net
Revenue represents the value of sales
exceptional items. Adjusted profit interest expense or income calculated
made to customers after deduction of
beforetax is stated before amortisation byapplying the liability discount rate
discounts, sales taxes and a provision for
ofnon-operating intangibles, profits tothe net pension asset or liability.
returns. Discounts include sales rebates,
lesslosses on disposal of non-current Foreach plan, the difference between
price discounts, customer incentives,
assets, profits less losses on sale and market value of assets and present
certain promotional activities and similar
closure ofbusinesses and exceptional valueof liabilities isdisclosed as an
items. Revenue does not include sales
items. Both measures are shown on assetor liability in thebalancesheet.
between group companies. Revenue
theface ofthe income statement.
isrecognised when the risks and Any related deferred tax (to the extent
rewards of the underlying products Adjusted earnings per share is recoverable) is disclosed separately in
havebeen substantially transferred showninthe notes and is stated the balance sheet. Remeasurements
tothe customer and when it can beforeamortisation of non-operating arerecognised immediately in other
bemeasured reliably. intangibles, profits less losses on comprehensive income. Surpluses are
disposal of non-current assets, profits recognised only to the extent that
In the food businesses, revenue
less losses onsale and closure of theyare recoverable. Movements in
fromthesale of goods is generally
businesses and exceptional items irrecoverable surpluses are recognised
recognisedon dispatch or delivery to
together with the related tax effect. immediately as remeasurements in
customers, dependent on shipping
othercomprehensive income.
terms. Discounts and returns are Constant currency
provided for as a reduction to revenue Constant currency is derived by Contributions payable by the group
when sales are recorded, based on translating the prior year results at inrespect of defined contribution
managements best estimate ofthe current year weighted average plansare charged to operating profit
amount required to meet claims exchangerates. asincurred. Other unfunded
bycustomers, taking into account post-employment liabilities are
Foreign currencies
contractual and legal obligations, accounted for in the same way as
In individual companies, transactions
historical trends and past experience. defined benefit pension plans.
inforeign currencies are recorded
In the retail business, revenue from attherate of exchange at the date Share-based payments
thesale of goods is recognised when ofthetransaction. Monetary assets The fair value of share awards at
the customer purchases goods in-store. andliabilities in foreign currencies grantdate is recognised as an employee
Returns are provided for as a reduction aretranslated at the rate prevailing expense with a corresponding increase
to revenue when sales are recorded, atthebalance sheet date. Any inequity, spread over the period
based on managements best estimate resultingdifferences are taken to duringwhich theemployees become
ofthe amount required to meet claims theincome statement. unconditionally entitled to theshares.
bycustomers, taking into account The amount recognised isadjusted
On consolidation, assets and
historical trends and past experience. toreflect expected and actuallevels
liabilitiesofforeign operations that
ofvesting except where the failure
aredenominated in foreign currencies
tovest is as a result of not meeting
are translated into sterling at the rate
amarketcondition.
ofexchange at the balance sheet date.
Financial statements
enacted or substantively enacted at income statement of changes in
relationships and grower agreements.
thebalance sheet date. foreignexchange or interest rates
Operating intangible assets are acquired
andcommodity prices, by matching
A deferred tax asset is recognised only in the ordinary course of business and
theimpact of the hedged risk and
tothe extent that it is probable that typically include computer software,
thehedging instrument in the
future taxable profits will be available landuse rights and emissions
incomestatement.
against which the asset can be utilised. tradinglicences.
Changes in the value of derivatives
Additional income taxes that arise Intangible assets other than goodwill
usedas hedges of future cash flows are
fromthe distribution of dividends are arestated at cost less accumulated
recognised through other comprehensive
recognised at the same time as the amortisation and impairment charges.
income in the hedging reserve, with
liability to pay the related dividend.
anyineffective portion recognised Amortisation is charged to the income
Financial assets and liabilities immediately in the income statement. statement on a straight-line basis over
Financial assets and financial liabilities, the estimated useful lives of intangible
When the future cash flow results
except for other non-current investments assets from the date they are available
intherecognition of a non-financial
and derivatives, are measured initially atfair foruse. The estimated useful lives
assetorliability, the gains and losses
value, plus directly attributable transaction aregenerally deemed to be no
previously recognised in the hedging
costs, and thereafter atamortised cost. longerthan:
reserve are included in the initial
Other non-current investments (classified
measurement of that asset or liability. Technology and brands up to 15 years
under other non-current receivables)
Otherwise, gains and losses previously Customer relationships up to 5 years
comprise available-for-sale investments
recognised in the hedging reserve Grower agreements up to 10 years
measured at market prices where
arerecognised in the income
available. Wherequoted market prices
statementatthe same time as
inan activemarket are not available,
thehedged transaction.
andwhere fair value cannot be reliably
measured, unquoted equity instruments
are measured at costless impairment.
The amendments bring bearer plants In the 2015 consolidated balance sheet, Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12
(which for the group are sugar cane non-current biological assets reduced and IAS 28: Investment Entities
roots) into the scope of IAS 16 rather from 83m to 30m. Deferred tax Applying the Consolidation Exception
than IAS 41. The previous valuation liabilities decreased from 233m to effective 2017 financial year
ofthese non-current biological assets 220m. The reduction in consolidated (endorsed by the EU since the
isreplaced by a cost or revaluation net assets of 40m comprised 15m balance sheet date)
approach. The group has selected the attributable to equity shareholders,
Amendments to IFRS 11: Accounting
historic cost approach as this removes with(5)m reflected in the translation
for Acquisitions of Interests in
subjective judgement from the accounting reserve and 20m in retained
JointOperations effective 2017
calculation. The change of policy has earnings,and 25m attributable
financial year
been applied retrospectively as if the tonon-controlling interests.
amendments had always applied. IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with
In the 2015 consolidated cash flow
Customers effective 2019 financial
Sugar cane roots are now shown statement, the previously reported
year (endorsed bythe EU since the
intheconsolidated balance sheet at 12madjustment to profitbefore tax
balance sheet date)
costless accumulated depreciation forthe net change in fair value of
andimpairment charges as a separate sugarcane roots has been reversed IFRS 16 Leases effective 2020
category within property, plant and andreplaced with a 7m adjustment financial year (not yet endorsed
equipment. The net changes in fair forhistoric cost depreciation and bythe EU)
valueof sugar cane roots previously 9mofincreased capital expenditure.
Amendments to IAS 1: Disclosure
credited to the consolidated income
These adjustments affect only Initiative effective 2017 financial year
statement have been reversed and
theSugaroperating segment and the
replaced with historic cost depreciation. Amendments to IAS 7: Disclosure
Europe& Africa geographic segment.
There is no netchange to the consolidated Initiative effective 2018 financial year
cash flowstatement, butthe adjustment There were no other changes to (not yet endorsed by the EU)
toprofit before taxfor the net change accounting policies during the year.
Amendments to IAS 12: Recognition
infair value ofsugar cane roots has Thegroup is also assessing the
of Deferred Tax Assets for Unrealised
beenreversed andreplaced with an impactof the following standards,
Losses effective 2018 financial year
adjustment for historic cost depreciation interpretations and amendments that
(not yet endorsed by the EU)
and increased capital expenditure. arenot yet effective. Where already
endorsed by the EU, these changes Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 38:
The impact of the changes prior to
willbe adopted on the effective Clarification of Acceptable Methods
the2014 balance sheet date have been
datesnoted. Where not yet endorsed of Depreciation and Amortisation
reflected in retained earnings in equity
bytheEU, the adoption date isless effective 2017 financial year
inthe restated 2014 consolidated
certain.The standards effective in 2017
balance sheet, together with the
are not expected to have any material
Financial statements
relatedimpact on non-controlling
effect onthe group. The impact of
interests. Inthe 2014 consolidated
theother standards is currently
balance sheet, non-current biological
underreview.
assets reduced from 96m to 36m
andare now disclosed as sugar cane Amendments to IFRS 2: Classification
roots within property, plant and and Measurement of Share-based
equipment. Deferredtax liabilities Payment Transactions effective 2019
decreased from 266m to 251m. financial year (not yet endorsed by
Thereduction in consolidated net assets the EU)
of45m comprised 17m attributable
Amendments to IFRS 4: Applying
toequity shareholders and 28m
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with
attributable tonon-controlling interests.
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts effective
In the 2015 consolidated income 2019 financial year (not yet endorsed
statement, the impact was an increase by the EU)
of10m incost of sales and a decrease
Annual Improvements to IFRSs
of 2m inthe overseas tax charge.
20122014 effective 2017 financial year
Ofthe net reduction of 8m in profit
after tax, 4m was attributable IFRS 9 Financial Instruments:
toequityshareholders and 4m to Classification and Measurement
non-controlling interests. 2015 basic effective 2019 financial year (not yet
earnings and adjusted earnings per endorsed by the EU)
shareboth decreased by 0.5p, from
67.3p to 66.8p, and 102.0p to
101.5p,respectively.
In applying the accounting policies The realisation of deferred tax assets Biological assets
detailed on pages 103 to 107, isdependent on the generation of In valuing growing cane, estimating
management has made estimates in a sufficient future taxable profits. The sucrose content requires management to
number of areas and the actual outcome group recognises deferred tax assets to assess expected cane and sucrose yields
may differ from those calculated. Key the extent that it is considered probable for the following season considering
sources of estimation uncertainty at the that sufficient taxable profits will be weather conditions and harvesting
balance sheet date, with the potential for available in the future. Deferred tax programmes; estimating sucrose price
material adjustment to the carrying value assets are reduced to the extent that requires management to assess into
of assets and liabilities within the next itisno longer considered probable that which markets the forthcoming crop will
financial year,are set out below. therelated tax benefit will berealised. be sold and assess domestic and export
prices as well as related foreign currency
Forecasts and discount rates Post-retirement benefits
exchange rates. The carrying value of
The carrying values of a number of items The groups defined benefit pension
growing cane is disclosed in note 16.
on the balance sheet are dependent on schemes and similar arrangements are
estimates of future cash flows arising assessed annually in accordance with Taxation
from the groups operations which, IAS19. The accounting valuation, which The group makes provision for open
insome circumstances, are discounted has been assessed using assumptions taxissues including, in a number of
toarrive at a net present value. determined with independent actuarial jurisdictions, routine tax audits which are
advice, resulted in a net liability of by nature complex and can take a number
Assessment for impairment involves
303m being recognised as at of years to resolve. Provisions are based
comparing the book value of an asset
17September 2016. The size of this net on managements interpretation of tax
with its recoverable amount (being the
liability is sensitive to the market value of law in each country and reflect the
higher of value in use and fair value less
the assets held by the schemes, to the bestestimate of the liability. The group
costs to sell). Value in use is determined
discount rate used in assessing liabilities, believes it has made adequate provision
with reference to projected future cash
to the actuarial assumptions (which for such matters.
flows discounted at an appropriate rate.
include price inflation, rates of pension
Both the cash flows and the discount
and salary increases, mortality and other
rate involve a significant degree of
demographic assumptions) and to the
estimation uncertainty.
level of contributions. Further details are
included in note11.
1. Operating segments Segment results, assets and liabilities bread & baked goods, cereals, ethnic
The group has five operating segments, include items directly attributable to foods, herbs & spices, and meat
as described below. These are the asegment as well as those that can products, which are sold to retail,
groups operating divisions, based on beallocated on a reasonable basis. wholesale andfoodservice businesses.
themanagement and internal reporting Unallocated items comprise mainly
Sugar
structure, which combine businesses corporate assets and expenses, cash,
The growing and processing of sugar
with common characteristics, primarily borrowings, employee benefits balances
beet and sugar cane for sale to industrial
inrespect of the type of products and current and deferred tax balances.
users and to Silver Spoon, which is
offeredby each business, but also the Segment non-current asset additions
included in the grocery segment.
production processes involved and the arethe total cost incurred during the
manner of the distribution and sale of period to acquire segment assets that Agriculture
goods. The board is the chief operating are expected to be used for more than The manufacture of animal feeds and
decision-maker. one year, comprising property, plant the provision of other products and
andequipment, operating intangibles services for the agriculture sector.
Inter-segment pricing is determined on
and biologicalassets.
an arms length basis. Segment result Ingredients
isadjusted operating profit, as shown Segment assets and liabilities are The manufacture of bakers yeast,
onthe face of the consolidated income presented before the reclassification bakery ingredients, enzymes, lipids,
statement. Segment assets comprise ofassets and liabilities held for sale. yeast extracts and cereal specialities.
allnon-current assets except employee
The group is comprised of the following Retail
benefits assets, income tax assets
operating segments: Buying and merchandising value
anddeferred tax assets, and all current
clothing and accessories through the
assets except cash and cash equivalents. Grocery
Primark andPenneys retail chains.
Segment liabilities comprise trade and The manufacture of grocery
other payables, derivative liabilities products, including hot beverages,
andprovisions. sugar & sweeteners, vegetable oils,
Geographical information
In addition to the required disclosure for operating segments, disclosure is also given of certain geographical information about
the groups operations, based on the geographical groupings: United Kingdom; Europe & Africa; The Americas; and Asia Pacific.
Revenues are shown by reference to the geographical location of customers. Profits are shown by reference to the geographical
location of the businesses. Segment assets are based on the geographical location of the assets.
Adjusted
Revenue operating profit
Financial statements
2015
2016 2015 2016 (restated)
m m m m
Operating segments
Grocery 3,274 3,177 304 285
Sugar 1,798 1,818 34 33
Agriculture 1,084 1,211 58 60
Ingredients 1,294 1,247 93 76
Retail 5,949 5,347 689 673
Central (60) (45)
13,399 12,800 1,118 1,082
Geographical information
United Kingdom 5,375 5,444 484 535
Europe &Africa 4,564 4,080 364 325
The Americas 1,403 1,269 168 148
Asia Pacific 2,057 2,007 102 74
13,399 12,800 1,118 1,082
Segment assets (excluding joint ventures and associates) 2,503 2,139 333 1,359 3,942 95 10,371
Investments in joint ventures and associates 52 21 129 58 260
Segment assets 2,555 2,160 462 1,417 3,942 95 10,631
Cash and cash equivalents 581 581
Income tax 13 13
Deferred tax assets 145 145
Employee benefits assets 6 6
Segment liabilities (522) (498) (106) (274) (1,166) (156) (2,722)
Loans and overdrafts (896) (896)
Income tax (147) (147)
Deferred tax liabilities (180) (180)
Employee benefits liabilities (309) (309)
Net assets 2,033 1,662 356 1,143 2,776 (848) 7,122
Segment disclosures given above are stated before reclassification of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale (see note 14).
Segment assets (excluding joint ventures and associates) 2,369 2,016 318 1,142 3,126 84 9,055
Investments in joint ventures and associates 22 17 125 48 212
Segment assets 2,391 2,033 443 1,190 3,126 84 9,267
Cash and cash equivalents 702 702
Deferred tax assets 125 125
Employee benefits assets 125 125
Segment liabilities (451) (391) (115) (230) (1,034) (104) (2,325)
Loans and overdrafts (896) (896)
Income tax (126) (126)
Deferred tax liabilities (220) (220)
Employee benefits liabilities (141) (141)
Net assets 1,940 1,642 328 960 2,092 (451) 6,511
Financial statements
Non-current asset additions 104 130 17 58 351 6 666
Depreciation (94) (83) (9) (45) (173) (4) (408)
Amortisation (37) (39) (2) (3) (81)
Exceptional item (98) (98)
Impairment of goodwill on disposal ofbusiness (46) (46)
Impairment of intangible on closure of business (11) (11)
2. Operating costs
2015
2016 (restated)
Note m m
Operating costs
Cost of sales (including amortisation of intangibles) 10,258 9,781
Distribution costs 1,265 1,259
Administration expenses 836 781
Exceptional item 5 98
12,364 11,919
The exceptional item in 2016 is a charge of 5m for costs associated with the buyout of the Illovo Sugar Limited non-controlling
interests.
In 2015, the exceptional item was a 98m non-cash charge to impair the groups shareholder loans to Vivergo Fuels which, at the
time ofthe impairment, was a joint venture in which the groups equity interest was 47%. Vivergo Fuels is based in the UK and
isincluded in the Sugar segment. The impairment was a consequence of the continuing fall in crude oil and bioethanol prices
andthe further weakening of the euro against sterling, both of which affected the groups assessment of the recoverability
oftheshareholder loans. An exceptional tax credit of 22m arose on this item.
2016 2015
Auditors remuneration m m
Fees payable to the Companys auditor and its associates in respect of the audit
Group audit of these financial statements 0.7 0.7
Audit of the Companys subsidiaries financial statements 4.8 4.9
Total audit remuneration 5.5 5.6
Fees payable to the Companys auditor and its associates in respect of non-audit related services
Audit-related assurance services 0.3 0.3
Tax compliance services 0.5 0.6
Tax advisory services 0.3 0.9
Information technology services 0.2
All other services 0.1 0.3
Total non-audit related remuneration 1.2 2.3
Fees payable to the Companys auditor and its associates in respect of the groups
pensionschemes
Audit of the pension schemes 0.1
0.1
In 2016 the Companys auditor was Ernst & Young LLP (2015 KPMG LLP).
3. Employees
2016 2015
Average number of employees
United Kingdom 43,954 42,416
Europe & Africa 64,308 60,629
The Americas 5,284 4,421
Asia Pacific 16,370 16,570
129,916 124,036
Note m m
Employee benefits expense
Wages and salaries 1,866 1,723
Social security contributions 216 201
Contributions to defined contribution schemes 11 74 76
Charge for defined benefit schemes 11 45 47
Equity-settled share-based payment schemes 23 7 11
2,208 2,058
Details of directors remuneration, share incentives and pension entitlements are shown in the Remuneration report on pages
69to 87.
Finance expense
Bank loans and overdrafts (26) (34)
All other borrowings (28) (25)
Finance leases (1) (1)
Other payables (1) (1)
(56) (61)
Financial statements
Other financial income/(expense)
Expected return on employee benefit scheme assets 11 135 140
Interest charge on employee benefit scheme liabilities 11 (134) (139)
Interest charge on irrecoverable surplus 11 (1) (1)
Net financial income from employee benefit schemes
Net foreign exchange gains/(losses) on financing activities 3 (5)
Total other financial income/(expense) 3 (5)
The UK corporation tax rate was reduced to 20% with effect from 1 April 2015 and further reductions to 19% and 17% have also
now been enacted which will take effect in April 2017 and April 2020 respectively. Accordingly, UK deferred tax has been calculated
using these rates as appropriate.
In 2015, a tax credit of 22m arose on the exceptional impairment charge, which was included in UK current tax.
Deferred taxation balances are analysed in note 12.
6. Dividends
2016 2015
pence pence 2016 2015
per share per share m m
2014 final 24.30 192
2015 interim 10.00 79
2015 final 25.00 198
2016 interim 10.30 81
35.30 34.30 279 271
The 2016 interim dividend was declared on 19 April 2016 and paid on 1 July 2016. The 2016 final dividend of 26.45 pence,
totalvalue of 209m, will be paid on 13 January 2017 to shareholders on the register on 16 December 2016.
Dividends relating to the period were 36.75 pence per share totalling 290m (2015 35.00 pence per share totalling 277m).
2015
2016 (restated)
m m
Adjusted profit for the period 840 802
Disposal of non-current assets 11 8
Sale and closure of businesses (14) (172)
Exceptional item (5) (98)
Tax effect on above adjustments 1 19
Amortisation of non-operating intangibles (21) (55)
Tax credit on non-operating intangibles amortisation and goodwill 5 8
Non-controlling interests share of the above adjustments 1 16
Profit for the period attributable to equity shareholders 818 528
2015
2016 (restated)
pence pence
Adjusted earnings per share 106.2 101.5
Disposal of non-current assets 1.4 1.0
Sale and closure of businesses (1.8) (21.7)
Exceptional item (0.6) (12.4)
Tax effect on above adjustments 0.1 2.4
Amortisation of non-operating intangibles (2.6) (7.0)
Tax credit on non-operating intangibles amortisation and goodwill 0.6 1.0
Non-controlling interests share of the above adjustments 0.1 2.0
Financial statements
Earnings per ordinary share 103.4 66.8
8. Intangible assets
Non-operating Operating
Customer Grower
Goodwill Technology Brands relationships agreements Other Other Total
m m m m m m m m
Cost
At 13 September 2014 1,223 195 362 97 123 6 248 2,254
Acquisitions externally purchased 42 42
Acquired through business combinations 5 45 8 58
Businesses disposed (46) (11) (57)
Other disposals (16) (16)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange (36) (15) (5) (10) (18) (1) (14) (99)
At 12 September 2015 1,146 180 402 95 105 5 249 2,182
Acquisitions externally purchased 38 38
Acquired through business combinations 3 2 5
Other disposals (7) (7)
Transfer to assets classified as held for sale (119) (52) (13) (184)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange 107 28 32 14 13 1 36 231
At 17 September 2016 1,137 208 384 109 118 6 303 2,265
Impairment
As at 17 September 2016, the consolidated balance sheet included goodwill of 1,220m (2015 1,113m), of which 118m is
classified as held for sale (see note 14). Goodwill is allocated to the groups cash-generating units (CGUs), or groups of CGUs,
thatare expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination that gave rise to the goodwill, as follows:
2016 2015
CGU or group of CGUs Primary reporting segment Discount rate m m
ACH Grocery 9.8% 292 248
AB Mauri Ingredients 12.1% 308 268
Twinings Ovaltine Grocery 9.5% 119 119
Capullo Grocery 13.4% 46 58
Illovo Sugar 18.3% 114 102
AB World Foods Grocery 10.8% 78 78
Other (not individually significant) Various Various 263 240
1,220 1,113
Financial statements
ona CGU carrying value of $947m). The geographic diversity and varying local economic environments of AB Mauris operations
mean thatthe critical assumptions underlying the detailed forecasts used in the impairment model are wide ranging. It is therefore
impractical to provide meaningful sensitivities to these assumptions other than the discount rate. The discount rate used was
12.1% (2015 14.7%) and would have to increase to more than 17.0% (2015 16.7%) before value in use fell below the CGU
carrying value. Estimates of long-term growth rates beyond the forecast periods were 2%3% (2015 2%3%) per annum
dependent on location.
For all goodwill other than AB Mauri, management has concluded that no reasonably possible change in key assumptions
onwhich it has determined value in use would cause carrying values to materially exceed value in use.
2016 2015
m m
Net book value of finance lease assets 12 11
Land and buildings at net book value comprise:
freehold 1,453 1,360
long leasehold 326 301
short leasehold 73 98
1,852 1,759
Capital expenditure commitments contracted but not provided for 498 323
Land and buildings at net book value classified as held for sale comprise 23m of freehold and 30m of short leasehold.
Financial statements
Joint ventures Associates
2016 2015 2016 2015
m m m m
Non-current assets 95 75 19 15
Current assets 316 296 195 157
Current liabilities (188) (166) (171) (139)
Non-current liabilities (21) (42) (5) (2)
Goodwill 19 17 1 1
Net assets 221 180 39 32
The mortality assumptions used to value the UK defined benefit schemes in both years are derived from the S2 mortality tables
with improvements in line with the 2015 projection model (2015 2013 projection model) prepared by the Continuous Mortality
Investigation of the UK actuarial profession, with no rating for males and a +0.7-year rating down for females, both with a
long-term trend of 1.25% (2015 1.5%). These mortality assumptions take account of experience to date, and assumptions for
further improvements in life expectancy of scheme members. Examples of the resulting life expectancies in the UK defined
benefit schemes are as follows:
2016 2015
Life expectancy from age 65 (in years) Male Female Male Female
Member aged 65 in 2016 (2015) 22.2 24.8 22.7 25.4
Member aged 65 in 2036 (2035) 23.9 26.7 25.0 27.7
An allowance has been made for cash commutation in line with emerging scheme experience. Other demographic assumptions
for the UK defined benefit schemes are set having regard to the latest trends in scheme experience and other relevant data.
Theassumptions are reviewed and updated as necessary as part of the periodic funding valuation of the schemes.
For the overseas schemes, regionally appropriate assumptions for mortality, financial and demographic factors have been used.
A sensitivity to the rate of increase in pensions in payment and pensions in deferment is represented by the inflation sensitivity,
as all pensions increases and deferred revaluations are linked to inflation.
The sensitivity analysis above has been determined based on reasonably possible changes in the respective assumptions
occurring at the end of the period and may not be representative of the actual change. It is based on a change in the specific
assumption while holding all other assumptions constant. When calculating the sensitivities, the same method used to calculate
scheme liabilities recognised in the balance sheet has been applied. The method and assumptions used in preparing the
sensitivity analysis have not changed since the prior year.
Balance sheet
2016 2015
UK Overseas Total UK Overseas Total
m m m m m m
Equities 1,278 162 1,440 1,213 127 1,340
Government bonds 974 41 1,015 669 36 705
Corporate and other bonds 558 73 631 627 56 683
Property 295 16 311 259 10 269
Cash and other assets 534 61 595 575 62 637
Scheme assets 3,639 353 3,992 3,343 291 3,634
Scheme liabilities (3,777) (507) (4,284) (3,253) (391) (3,644)
Aggregate net deficit (138) (154) (292) 90 (100) (10)
Irrecoverable surplus* (11) (11) (6) (6)
Net pension (liability)/asset (138) (165) (303) 90 (106) (16)
Analysed as
Schemes in surplus 6 6 120 5 125
Schemes in deficit (138) (171) (309) (30) (111) (141)
Financial statements
(138) (165) (303) 90 (106) (16)
* The surpluses in the plans are only recoverable to the extent that the group can benefit from either refunds formally agreed
orfrom future contribution reductions.
Included within the groups overseas net pension liabilities analysed above is a deficit of 13m (25m of assets and 38m
ofliabilities) which is classified as held for sale (2015 nil), see note 14.
Corporate and other bonds relating to UK schemes of 558m (2015 627m) include 52m (2015 49m) of assets whose
valuation is not derived from quoted market prices. The valuation for all other equity assets, government bonds, corporate and
other bonds is derived from quoted market prices. The carrying value of UK property assets is based on a 31 March market
valuation, adjusted for purchases, disposals and price indexation between the valuation and the balance sheet dates. Cash
andother assets contains 296m (2015 185m) of assets whose valuation is not derived from quoted market prices.
For financial reporting in the groups accounts, liabilities are assessed by actuaries using the projected unit method. The
accounting value is different from the result obtained using the funding basis, mainly due to different assumptions used to
projectscheme liabilities.
The defined benefit scheme liabilities comprise 30% (2015 28%) in respect of active participants, 24% (2015 23%) for
deferred participants and 46% (2015 49%) for pensioners.
The weighted average duration of the defined benefit scheme liabilities at the end of the year is 20 years for both UK and overseas
schemes (2015 18 years for both UK and overseas schemes).
Cash flow
Group cash flow in respect of employee benefits schemes comprises contributions paid to funded schemes of 38m (2015 39m)
and benefits paid in respect of unfunded schemes of nil (2015 nil). Contributions to funded defined benefit schemes are subject
to periodic review. Contributions to defined contribution schemes amounted to 74m (2015 76m).
Total contributions to funded schemes and benefit payments by the group in respect of unfunded schemes in 2017 are currently
expected to be approximately 26m in the UK and 8m overseas, totalling 34m (2016 UK 28m, overseas 9m, totalling 37m).
Other comprehensive income
Remeasurements of the net asset/liability recognised in other comprehensive income are as follows:
2016 2015
m m
Return on scheme assets excluding amounts included in net interest in the income statement 288 118
Actuarial losses arising from changes in financial assumptions (805) (151)
Actuarial gains/(losses) arising from changes in demographic assumptions 257 (6)
Experience gains on scheme liabilities 6 60
Change in unrecognised surplus (4) 6
Remeasurements of the net pension asset/liability (258) 27
Financial statements
Certain deferred tax assets and liabilities have been offset. The following is the analysis of the deferred tax balances (after offset)
for financial reporting purposes:
2015
2016 (restated)
m m
Deferred tax assets (139) (125)
Deferred tax liabilities 139 220
95
The recoverability of deferred tax assets is supported by the expected level of future profits in the countries concerned.
Otherdeferred tax assets totalling 99m (2015 86m) have not been recognised on the basis that their future economic
benefitis uncertain.
In addition, there are temporary differences of 2,645m (2015 1,992m) relating to investments in subsidiaries. No deferred tax
has been provided in respect of these differences, since the timing of the reversals can be controlled and it is probable that the
temporary differences will not reverse in the future.
In addition to the amounts disclosed above, there are 10m of trade and other receivables classified as assets held for sale (see note 14).
The directors consider that the carrying amount of receivables approximates fair value.
For details of credit risk exposure on trade and other receivables, see note 25.
Trade and other receivables include 36m (2015 19m) in respect of finance lease receivables, with 33m in non-current loans
and receivables and 3m in current other receivables (2015 16m in non-current loans and receivables and 3m in current other
receivables). Minimum lease payments receivable are 4m within one year, 5m between one and five years and 28m in more
than five years (2015 3m within one year and 16m between one and five years).
The finance lease receivables relate to property, plant and equipment leased to a joint venture of the group (see note 28).
14. Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale
In September 2016, the group announced that it had reached agreement to sell its cane sugar business in southern China,
subject to third-party consents and regulatory approvals, and ACHs North American herbs and spices business. ACH is in the
Grocery segment. The US disposal is expected to complete in mid-November 2016.
Both businesses have been classified as a disposal group at year end. Neither business qualifies as a discontinued operation.
The proceeds of disposal for each business are expected to exceed the book value of the related net assets and accordingly
noimpairment losses have been recognised on the classification of these operations as held for sale.
2016
m
Assets classified as held for sale
Intangible assets 127
Property, plant and equipment 103
Deferred tax assets 6
Inventories 36
Trade and other receivables 10
Income tax 4
Cash and cash equivalents 26
312
Liabilities classified as held for sale
Loans and overdrafts 11
Trade and other payables 10
Deferred tax liabilities 41
Employee benefits liabilities 13
75
15. Inventories
2016 2015
m m
Raw materials and consumables 369 283
Work in progress 26 28
Finished goods and goods held for resale 1,638 1,516
2,033 1,827
Write down of inventories (113) (102)
In addition to the amounts disclosed above, there are 36m of inventories classified as assets held for sale (see note 14).
Growing cane
The fair value of growing cane is determined using inputs that are unobservable, using the best information available in the
circumstances for using the growing cane, and therefore falls into the level 3 category of fair value measurement. The following
assumptions were used in the determination of the estimated sucrose tonnage at 17 September 2016:
South Africa Malawi Zambia Swaziland Tanzania Mozambique
Expected area to harvest (hectares) 5,205 19,701 16,351 8,536 9,676 6,018
Estimated yield (tonnes cane/hectare) 67.2 92.9 109.2 85.1 77.5 80.0
Average maturity of growing cane 46.4% 68.2% 65.7% 67.7% 46.2% 71.6%
The following assumptions were used in the determination of the estimated sucrose tonnage at 12 September 2015:
South Africa Malawi Zambia Swaziland Tanzania Mozambique
Expected area to harvest (hectares) 5,277 19,611 16,671 8,647 9,576 5,907
Estimated yield (tonnes cane/hectare) 66.3 101.3 114.6 94.0 81.0 85.8
Average maturity of growing cane 45.1% 68.5% 65.7% 67.7% 46.2% 71.6%
A 1% change in the unobservable inputs could increase or decrease the fair value of growing cane as follows:
2016 2015
Financial statements
+1% -1% +1% -1%
m m m m
Estimated sucrose content 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0)
Estimated sucrose price 1.3 (1.3) 1.4 (1.4)
Cash at bank and in hand generally earns interest at rates based on the daily bank deposit rate.
Cash equivalents generally comprise deposits placed on money markets for periods of up to three months which earn interest at
a short-term deposit rate; and funds invested with fund managers that have a maturity of less than or equal to three months and
are at fixed rates.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value.
2016 2015
Note m m
Secured loans
USD floating rate 26 19
EUR floating rate 3
Other floating rate 51 27
Other fixed rate 4 2
Unsecured loans and overdrafts
Bank overdrafts 17 119 117
GBP floating rate 4 4
GBP fixed rate 177 177
USD floating rate 18
USD fixed rate 428 444
EUR floating rate 55 29
RMB floating rate 11 35
Other floating rate 5 8
Other fixed rate 2 1
Finance leases (fixed rate) 14 12
896 896
Loans and overdrafts on the face of the balance sheet 885 896
Loans and overdrafts classified as held for sale 14 11
896 896
Secured loans comprise amounts borrowed from commercial banks and are secured by floating charges over the assets of subsidiaries.
Bank overdrafts generally bear interest at floating rates.
In addition to the amounts disclosed above, there are 10m of trade and other payables classified as liabilities held for sale (see note 14).
For payables with a remaining life of less than one year, carrying amount is deemed to reflect fair value.
20. Provisions
Deferred
Restructuring consideration Other Total
m m m m
At 12 September 2015 41 7 18 66
Created 35 4 39
Utilised (14) (2) (2) (18)
Released (5) (1) (6)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange 3 2 2 7
At 17 September 2016 60 7 21 88
Current 38 3 13 54
Non-current 22 4 8 34
60 7 21 88
Financial liabilities within provisions comprised deferred consideration in both years (see note 25).
Restructuring
Restructuring provisions relate to the cash costs, including redundancy, associated with the groups announced reorganisation plans.
Deferred consideration
Deferred consideration comprises estimates of amounts due to the previous owners of businesses acquired by the group which
are often linked to performance or other conditions.
Other
Other provisions mainly comprise litigation claims and warranty claims arising from the sale and closure of businesses. The extent
and timing of the utilisation of these provisions is more uncertain given the nature of the claims and the period of the warranties.
Financial statements
Translation reserve
The translation reserve comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements
offoreign operations, as well as from the translation of liabilities that hedge the groups net investment in foreign subsidiaries.
Hedging reserve
The hedging reserve comprises all changes in the value of derivatives to the extent that they are effective cash flow hedges,
netof amounts recycled from the hedging reserve on occurrence of the hedged transaction or when the hedged transaction
isnolonger expected tooccur.
Satisfied by
Cash consideration 57
Deferred consideration 6
Interest in joint venture (8)
55
Net cash
Cash consideration 57
Cash and cash equivalents acquired (8)
Overdrafts acquired 3
52
In October 2014, the group acquired Dorset Cereals in the UK for gross cash consideration of 68m, but with cash acquired of
8m. Non-operating intangible assets of 21m in respect of brand and customer relationships together with the related deferred
tax were recognised as fair value adjustments.
In May 2015, the group acquired BPs 47% interest in Vivergo Fuels in the UK, in which the group already held an
equity-accounted joint venture interest of 47%. Fair value adjustments comprised the valuation of shareholder loan obligations
and associated interest accruals together with the related tax consequences.
A non-cash charge of 75m was recorded in line with accounting requirements to remeasure the groups interest at fair value
prior to the acquisition. This was charged to loss on sale and closure of business.
The acquisitions contributed aggregate revenues of 81m and an adjusted loss before tax of 1m for the period between
thedates of acquisition and 12 September 2015. Aggregate contributions to revenue and adjusted profit before tax, had the
acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the period, were not disclosed as appropriate financial information, prepared under
Adopted IFRS, was not available.
Grocery (warranties) 6 6
Agriculture (warranties) 3 3
(66) 4 (11) (99) (172)
The group sold the Yian and BoCheng beet sugar factories in Heilongjiang province in north China and restructured the
associated head office in Beijing. This reduced the groups assets and liabilities as follows:
m
Net assets
Intangible assets 9
Property, plant and equipment 47
Inventories 3
Trade and other payables (1)
Loans (1)
Taxation 5
Net identifiable assets and liabilities 62
Goodwill 46
Non-controlling interests (2)
Financial statements
Recycle of effect of movements in foreign exchange (8)
Profits less losses on sale and closure of businesses (100)
Total consideration (2)
Satisfied by
Cash consideration 3
Provisions made (5)
(2)
Net cash
Cash consideration 3
The group incurred a net 75m non-cash charge arising on the acquisition of BPs 47% interest in Vivergo Fuels. Accounting
standards required the remeasurement of the groups interest at fair value prior to the acquisition, resulting in a loss on the
deemed disposal of the groups original interest prior to its immediate re-acquisition at fair value.
Also in the Sugar segment, an intangible asset with a carrying value of 11m was written off on closure of a small business
inNorth America.
14m of warranty provisions relating to disposals made in previous years were no longer required and were released during
theyear. These comprised 6m in Grocery (all in the UK), 5m in Sugar (4m in Europe & Africa and 1m in Asia Pacific) and 3m
inAgriculture (all in the UK).
The cash consideration received for the disposal was 3m which compared with a cash inflow of 5m on the sale of subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates shown in the cash flow statement. The difference related to deferred consideration received in
respect of prior year disposals.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise bank and cash balances, call deposits and short-term investments with original maturities
ofthree months or less. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand of 119m form an integral part of the groups cash
management and are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the cash flow statement.
26m of cash at bank and cash in hand and 11m of short-term loans disclosed above are included within assets and liabilities
classified as held for sale (see note 14).
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities at amortised cost
Trade and other payables (2,295) (1,930)
Secured loans (81) (51)
Unsecured loans and overdrafts (fair value 2016 851m; 2015 889m) (801) (833)
Finance leases (fair value 2016 19m; 2015 17m) (14) (12)
Deferred consideration (7) (7)
At fair value through profit or loss
Derivative liabilities not designated in a cash flow hedging relationship:
currency derivatives (8) (6)
commodity derivatives (1) (1)
Designated net investment hedging relationships
Financial statements
Derivative liabilities designated as net investment hedging instruments:
currency derivatives (16)
Designated cash flow hedging relationships
Derivative liabilities designated and effective as cash flow hedging instruments:
currency derivatives (36) (19)
commodity derivatives (12) (7)
Total financial liabilities (3,271) (2,866)
Net financial liabilities (1,379) (1,047)
2016 2015
Contractual/ Contractual/
notional notional
amounts Level 1 Level 2 Total amounts Level 1 Level 2 Total
m m m m m m m m
Financial assets
Currency derivatives 1,330 101 101 1,311 73 73
Commodity derivatives 39 1 3 4 24 1 1
1,369 1 104 105 1,335 1 73 74
Financial liabilities
Currency derivatives 1,353 (60) (60) 929 (25) (25)
Commodity derivatives 112 (13) (13) 108 (1) (7) (8)
1,465 (73) (73) 1,037 (1) (32) (33)
2016 2015
Currency Commodity Currency Commodity
derivatives derivatives Total derivatives derivatives Total
m m m m m m
Opening balance 6 6 12 (30) (4) (34)
(Gains)/losses recognised in the hedging reserve (82) 12 (70) (174) 20 (154)
Amount removed from the hedging reserve and
included in the income statement:
revenue (21) 1 (20) 39 39
cost of sales (9) (9) (16) (16)
other financial income/expense 46 46 13 1 14
Amount removed from the hedging reserve and
included in equity:
retained earnings 15 15
Amount removed from the hedging reserve and
included in a non-financial asset:
inventory 56 (5) 51 164 9 173
Deferred tax (4) (4) (7) (4) (11)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange 1 1 1 1
Closing balance 16 6 22 6 6 12
Cash flows are expected to occur:
within six months 5 6 11 3 5 8
between six months and one year 8 8 1 1
between one and two years 1 1
between two and five years 1 1 1 1
after five years 2 2 1 1
16 6 22 6 6 12
The closing balance of 22m is wholly attributable to equity shareholders (2015 11m attributable to equity shareholders and
1m to non-controlling interests). Of the net movements including foreign exchange in theyear of 10m, 11m is attributable
toequity shareholders and (1)m to non-controlling interests (2015 40m attributable toequity shareholders and 6m to
Financial statements
non-controlling interests).
d) Financial risk identification and management
The group is exposed to the following financial risks from its use of financial instruments:
market risk;
credit risk; and
liquidity risk.
The groups financial risk management process seeks to enable the early identification, evaluation and effective management of
key risks facing the business. Risk management policies and systems have been established and are reviewed regularly to reflect
changes in market conditions and the groups activities. The group, through its standards and procedures, aims to develop a
disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.
The group sources and sells products and manufactures goods in many locations around the world. These operations expose the
group to potentially significant price volatility in the financial and commodity markets. Trading and risk management teams have
been established in the groups major businesses to manage this exposure by entering into a range of products, including physical
and financial forward contracts, futures and, where appropriate, options. These teams work closely with group Treasury and
report regularly to executivemanagement.
Treasury operations and commodity procurement are conducted within a clearly defined framework of board-approved policies
and guidelines to manage the groups financial and commodity risks. Treasury works closely with the groups procurement teams
to manage commodity risks. Treasury policy seeks to ensure that adequate financial resources are available to the group at all
times, for the management and development of the groups businesses, whilst effectively managing its market risk and credit
risk. The groups risk management policy explicitly forbids the use of financial or commodity derivatives (outside its risk
management framework of mitigating financial and commodity risks) for speculative purposes.
Financial statements
inexchange rates on its foreign currency trade receivables and payables. The group does not seek formal fair value hedge
accounting for such transaction hedges. Instead, such derivatives are classified as held for trading and marked to market through
the income statement. This offsets the income statement impact of the retranslation of the foreign currency trade receivables
and payables.
Economic (forecast) risk
The group also uses forward foreign currency contracts to hedge its exposure to movements in exchange rates on its highly
probable forecast foreign currency sales and purchases on a rolling 12-month basis. The group does not formally define the
proportion of highly probable forecast sales and purchases to hedge, but agrees an appropriate percentage on an individual basis
with each business by reference to the groups risk management policies and prevailing market conditions. The group documents
currency derivatives used to hedge its forecast transactions as cash flow hedges. To the extent that cash flow hedges are
effective, gains and losses are deferred in equity until the forecast transaction occurs, at which point the gains and losses are
recycled either tothe income statement or to the non-financial assetacquired.
The majority of the groups currency derivatives have original maturities of less than one year.
The groups most significant currency transaction exposures are:
sugar prices in British Sugar to movements in the sterling/euro exchange rate;
sugar prices in Illovo to movements in the South African rand/US dollar/euro exchange rates; and
sourcing for Primark costs are denominated in a number of currencies, predominantly sterling, euros and US dollars.
Elsewhere, a number of businesses make sales and purchase a variety of raw materials in foreign currencies (primarily US dollars
and euros), giving rise to transaction exposures. In all other material respects, businesses tend to operate in their functional currencies.
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables (18) (346) (38) (9) (411)
Unsecured loans and overdrafts (428) (1) (429)
Finance leases (1) (1)
Deferred consideration (2) (1) (3)
(18) (776) (39) (11) (844)
Currency derivatives
Gross amounts receivable 75 1,521 197 168 1,961
Gross amounts payable (4) (49) (598) (73) (724)
71 1,472 (401) 95 1,237
2015
Sterling US dollar Euro Other Total
m m m m m
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 1 19 4 8 32
Trade and other receivables 22 50 12 84
1 41 54 20 116
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables (30) (286) (40) (10) (366)
Unsecured loans and overdrafts (8) (444) (3) (455)
(38) (730) (40) (13) (821)
Currency derivatives
Gross amounts receivable 73 1,207 91 104 1,475
Gross amounts payable (2) (96) (638) (66) (802)
71 1,111 (547) 38 673
Sensitivity analysis
The following sensitivity analysis illustrates the impact that a 10% strengthening of the groups operating currencies against
localfunctional currencies would have had on profit and equity. The analysis covers currency translation exposures at year end
onbusinesses financial assets and liabilities that are not denominated in the functional currencies of those businesses. A similar
but opposite impact would be felt on both profit and equity if the groups main operating currencies weakened against local
functional currencies by a similar amount.
The exposure to foreign exchange gains and losses on translating the financial statements of subsidiaries into sterling is not
included in this sensitivity analysis, as there is no impact on the income statement, and the gains and losses are recorded directly
in the translation reserve in equity (see opposite page for a separate sensitivity). This sensitivity is presented before taxation
andnon-controlling interests.
Associated British Foods plc Annual Report and Accounts 2016
137
A second sensitivity analysis calculates the impact on the groups profit before tax if the average rates used to translate the
results of the groups foreign operations into sterling were adjusted to show a 10% strengthening of sterling. A similar but
opposite impact would be felt on profit before tax if sterling weakened against the other currencies by a similar amount.
2016 2015
impact on impact on
profit for profit for
the year the year
10% strengthening of sterling against m m
US dollar (13) (10)
Euro (24) (20)
Rand (1) 2
Renminbi (1) 7
Australian dollar (2) (2)
g) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that counterparties to financial instruments do not perform according to the terms of the contract or
instrument. The groups businesses are exposed to counterparty credit risk when dealing with customers, and from certain
financing activities.
The immediate credit exposure of financial instruments is represented by those financial instruments that have a net positive
fairvalue by counterparty at 17 September 2016. The group considers its maximum exposure to credit risk to be:
2016 2015
Note m m
Cash and cash equivalents 581 702
Loans and receivables 25a 1,206 1,043
Financial statements
Derivative assets at fair value through profit and loss 14 3
Derivative assets in designated net investment hedging relationships 1 33
Derivative assets in designated cash flow hedging relationships 90 38
1,892 1,819
The majority of cash balances and short-term deposits are held with strong investment-grade banks or financial institutions.
The group uses market knowledge, changes in credit ratings and other techniques to identify significant changes to the financial
profile of its counterparties.
Trade and other receivables
Concentrations of credit risk are limited as a result of the groups large and diverse customer base. The group has an established
credit policy applied by each business under which the credit status of each new customer is reviewed before credit is advanced.
This includes external credit evaluations where possible and in some cases bank references. Credit limits are established for
allsignificant or high-risk customers, which represent the maximum amount permitted to be outstanding without requiring
additional approval from the appropriate level of management. Outstanding debts are continually monitored by each business.
Credit limits are reviewed on a regular basis, and at least annually. Customers that fail to meet the groups benchmark
creditworthiness may only transact with the group on a prepayment basis. Aggregate exposures are monitored at group level.
Many of the groups customers have been transacting with the group for many years and the incidence of bad debts has been
low. Where appropriate, goods are sold subject to retention of title so that, in the event of non-payment, the group may have
asecured claim. The group does not typically require collateral in respect of trade and other receivables.
The group provides for impairment of financial assets including trade and other receivables based on known events, and makes a
collective provision for losses yet to be identified, based on historical data. The majority of the provision comprises specific amounts.
Based on past experience, the group believes that no impairment allowance is necessary in respect of trade receivables that are
not pastdue.
Trade receivables are stated net of the following provision for irrecoverable amounts:
2016 2015
m m
Opening balance 22 36
Amounts provided for during the year 4 6
Amounts released during the year (2) (13)
Amounts utilised during the year (3) (4)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange 4 (3)
Closing balance 25 22
No trade receivables were written off directly to the income statement in either year.
The directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other receivables approximates fair value.
Cash and cash equivalents
Banking relationships are generally limited to those banks that are members of the core relationship group. These banks are
selected for their credit status, global reach and their ability to meet the businesses day-to-day banking requirements. The credit
ratings of these institutions are monitored on a continuing basis. In locations where the core relationship banking group cannot
beused, operating procedures including choice of bank, opening of bank accounts and repatriation of funds must be agreed with
group Treasury. The group has not recorded impairments against cash or cash equivalents, nor have any recoverability issues
been identified with such balances. Such items are typically recoverable on demand or in line with normal banking arrangements.
Other financial assets
Other non-current investments are typically equity investments with no fixed maturity or recoverability date. No impairment
issues have been identified with respect to other non-current investments.
Since derivative assets are recorded at fair value, either through profit and loss for those not in a designated cash flow hedging
relationship, or otherwise through the hedging or net investment hedging reserve, no impairment issues have been identified.
2015
Due Due Due
between between between
Due within 6 months 1 and 2 2 and 5 Due after Contracted Carrying
6 months and 1 year years years 5 years amount amount
Note m m m m m m m
Financial statements
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Trade and other payables 19 (1,914) (16) (1,930) (1,930)
Secured loans 18 (7) (21) (7) (16) (51) (51)
Unsecured loans and overdrafts 18 (208) (111) (40) (264) (345) (968) (833)
Finance leases 26 (1) (1) (2) (37) (41) (12)
Deferred consideration 20 (1) (1) (1) (4) (7) (7)
Derivative financial liabilities
Currency derivatives (net payments) (7) (3) (10) (25)
Commodity derivatives (net payments) (30) (14) (2) (46) (8)
Total financial liabilities (2,168) (166) (51) (286) (382) (3,053) (2,866)
The above tables do not include forecast data for liabilities which may be incurred in the future but which were not contracted
at17September 2016.
The principal reasons for differences between carrying values and contractual undiscounted cash flows are coupon payments
onthe fixed rate debt to which the group is already committed, future interest payments on the groups finance leases, and cash
flows on derivative financial instruments which are not aligned with their fair value.
In addition to the above facilities there are also 296m (2015 212m) of undrawn and available credit lines for the purposes
ofissuing letters of credit and guarantees in the normal course of business.
The group also has 14m (2015 12m) of finance lease liabilities which are not included in the tables above, but which are
included in the groups loans and overdrafts in note 18.
The group has a 1.2bn syndicated facility which matures in July 2021. In addition to the bank debt, the Company has 588m
of private placement notes in issue to institutional investors in the US and Europe. At 17 September 2016, these had an average
remaining duration of 4.4 years and an average fixed coupon of 4.7%. The other significant core committed debt facilities
comprise local committed facilities in Illovo and Azucarera.
Uncommitted bank borrowing facilities are normally reaffirmed by the banks annually, although they can theoretically be
withdrawn at anytime.
Refer to note 9 for details of the groups capital commitments and to note 27 for a summary of the groups guarantees.
Anassessment of the groups current liquidity position is given in the Financial review on page 43.
j) Capital management
The capital structure of the group is presented in the balance sheet. The statement of changes in equity provides details on
equity and note 18 provides details of loans and overdrafts. Short and medium-term funding requirements are provided by a
variety of loan and overdraft facilities, both committed and uncommitted, with a range of counterparties and maturities. Longer
term funding is sourced from a combination of these facilities, the private placement notes and committed syndicated loan facilities.
The boards policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to enable
successful future development of the business. The board monitors return on capital by division and determines the overall level
of dividends payable to shareholders.
From time to time the trustee of the Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust purchases the Companys shares in the market to
satisfy awards under the groups incentive plans. Once purchased, shares are not sold back into the market. The group does not
have a defined share buy-back plan.
There were no changes to the groups approach to capital management during the year. Neither the Company nor any of its
subsidiaries are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
Finance leases
Finance lease liabilities are payable as follows:
2016 2015
minimum minimum
lease 2016 2016 lease 2015 2015
payments interest principal payments interest principal
m m m m m m
27. Contingencies
Litigation and other proceedings against companies in the group are not considered material in the context of these financial statements.
Where group companies enter into financial guarantee contracts to guarantee the indebtedness of other group companies,
thegroup considers these to be insurance arrangements and has elected to account for them as such inaccordance with IFRS4.
In this respect, the guarantee contract is treated as a contingent liability until such time as it becomes probable that the relevant
group company issuing the guarantee will be required to make a payment under the guarantee.
As at 17 September 2016, group companies have provided guarantees in the ordinary course of business amounting to 1,912m
(2015 1,397m).
Financial statements
ventures (see note 29) and with its directors. In the course of normal operations, related party transactions entered into by the
group have been contracted on an arms length basis.
Material transactions and year end balances with related parties were as follows:
2016 2015
Sub note 000 000
Charges to Wittington Investments Limited in respect of services provided by the Company
andits subsidiary undertakings 1,226 661
Dividends paid by Associated British Foods and received in a beneficial capacity by:
(i) trustees of the Garfield Weston Foundation and their close family 1 10,012 9,838
(ii) directors of Wittington Investments Limited who are not trustees of the Foundation
andtheir close family 2,613 1,529
(iii) directors of the Company who are not trustees of the Foundation and are not directors
ofWittington Investments Limited 2 54 50
(iv) members of the Weston family employed within the Associated British Foods group 3 2 1,011
Sales to fellow subsidiary undertakings on normal trading terms 4 48 108
Sales to companies with common key management personnel on normal trading terms 5 16,642 13,343
Commissions paid to companies with common key management personnel on normal
tradingterms 5 1,490 1,602
Amounts due from companies with common key management personnel 5 1,748 1,541
Sales to joint ventures on normal trading terms 13,460 18,288
Sales to associates on normal trading terms 41,494 29,992
Purchases from joint ventures on normal trading terms 324,959 314,818
Purchases from associates on normal trading terms 17,424 16,132
Amounts due from joint ventures 37,531 18,959
Amounts due from associates 4,244 2,978
Amounts due to joint ventures 28,374 28,533
Amounts due to associates 3,342 2,278
% effective % effective
holding if holding if
Name Country not 100% Name Country not 100%
A.B. Exploration Limited United Kingdom AB Azucarera Iberia, S.L. Sociedad
A.B.F. Holdings Limited United Kingdom Unipersonal Spain
A.B.F. Nominees Limited United Kingdom AB Brasil Indstria e Comrcio de
A.B.F. Properties Limited United Kingdom Alimentos Ltda Brazil
AB (Harbin) Food Ingredients AB Calsa S.A. Ecuador
Company Limited China AB CALSA S.A. de C.V. Mexico
AB Agri Animal Nutrition (Jilin) AB CALSA SERVICIOS, S. DE R.L.
Co., Ltd China DE C.V. Mexico
AB Agri Animal Nutrition (Nantong) AB Enzimas Brasil Comercial Ltda Brazil
Co., Ltd China AB Enzymes GmbH Germany
AB Agri Limited United Kingdom AB Enzymes Oy Finland
AB Agri, LLC (in liquidation) Russian AB Enzymes Trading (Shanghai)
Federation Co., Ltd China
AB Agri Pumeixin Tech (Jiangxi) AB Food & Beverages (Thailand)
Co. Ltd. China Ltd. Thailand
AB Agri Vietnam Company Limited Vietnam AB Food & Beverages Australia
Pty. Limited Australia
Financial statements
ABF Overseas Limited United Kingdom
AB Mauri Netherlands European
ABF Overseas Limited, Sucursal
Holdings B.V. Netherlands
en Espaa Spain
AB Mauri Overseas Holdings
ABF PM Limited United Kingdom
Limited Australia
ABF Twinings Beverages
AB Mauri Pakistan (PRIVATE)
(Shanghai) Limited China
Limited Pakistan 60
ABF UK Finance Limited United Kingdom
AB Mauri Pakistan Pty Limited Australia
ABF US Holdings Limited United Kingdom
AB Mauri Philippines, Inc. Philippines
ABF Wynyard Park Limited
AB Mauri Portugal, S.A. Portugal 96
Partnership Australia
AB Mauri Properties Pty Limited Australia
Abitec Corporation United States
AB Mauri ROW Holdings
ABN (Overseas) Limited United Kingdom
Pty Limited Australia
ABN (Scotland) Limited United Kingdom
AB Mauri Spain, S.L.U. Spain
ABNA (Shanghai) Feed Co., Ltd. China
AB Mauri South America
Pty Limited Australia ABNA (Tianjin) Feed Co., Ltd. China
AB Mauri South West Asia ABNA Feed (Anhui) Co., Ltd. China
Pty Limited Australia ABNA Feed (Liaoning) Co., Ltd. China
AB Mauri Technology & ABNA Feed Company Limited United Kingdom
Development Pty Limited Australia ABNA Limited United Kingdom
AB Mauri Technology Pty Limited Australia ABNA Management (Shanghai)
AB Mauri Vietnam Limited Vietnam 66 Co., Ltd. China
AB Sugar Africa Limited United Kingdom ABNA Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. China
AB Sugar China Holdings Limited United Kingdom ACH Food Companies of Puerto
AB Sugar China Limited United Kingdom Rico, Inc. Puerto Rico
AB Sugar China North Limited United Kingdom ACH Food Companies, Inc. United States
AB Sugar Limited United Kingdom ACH Foods Mexico, S. de R.L.
de C.V. Mexico
AB Technology Limited United Kingdom
ACH Jupiter LLC United States
AB Tip Top (Wuhan) Baking Co Ltd China
Agrilines Limited United Kingdom
AB Vista Asia Pte. Limited Singapore
Agro Korn A/S Denmark
Financial statements
Mauri Yeast Australia Pty Limited Australia Primary Diets Limited United Kingdom
Meishan Mauri Yeast Co., Ltd. Primary Nutrition Limited United Kingdom
(in liquidation) China Proofex Products Company Ireland
Mitra Sugar Limited United Kingdom Prospeserv Unipessoal Lda Portugal 88
Mountsfield Park Finance Limited United Kingdom PT AB Food & Beverages
Moyeni Ranch Limited Swaziland 60 Indonesia Indonesia
N&C Enterprises Pty Ltd Australia R. Twining and Company Limited United Kingdom
Nanga Farms PLC Zambia 66 R. Twining and Company Sp. z o. o. Poland
NB Love Industries Pty Ltd Australia Relax Limited Malta 70
Nere Properties Limited United Kingdom Reynolds Brothers Limited South Africa
New Zealand Food Industries Rheinische Presshefe- und
Limited New Zealand Spritwerke GmbH Germany
Noodsberg Sugar Company Roses Nutrition Ltd United Kingdom
Limited South Africa S.A. Sugar Distributors (Pty)
Nueva Comercial Azucarera, S.A. Spain 88 Limited South Africa
Nutrition Services (International) Seedcote Systems Limited United Kingdom
Limited United Kingdom Serpentine Securities Limited United Kingdom
Nutrition Trading (International) Serrol Ingredients Pty Limited Australia
Limited United Kingdom Servicios Alimentos Capullo,
Nutrition Trading Limited United Kingdom S. de R.L. de C.V. Mexico
Ohly GmbH Germany Shanghai AB Food & Beverages
Ohly Grundbesitz GmbH Germany Co., Ltd. China
Panyu Mauri Food Co., Ltd. China Sizzlers Ireland
Parkstone (Jersey) Limited Sizzlers Limited United Kingdom
(in liquidation) Jersey Sizzles International Unlimited
Parkstone Bakeries Limited Company Ireland
(in liquidation) United Kingdom Sizzles Limited United Kingdom
Patak (Spices) Limited United Kingdom Smithchem (Pty) Limited South Africa
Patak Food Limited United Kingdom Speedibake Limited United Kingdom
SPI Pharma SAS France
Lusaka Stock Exchange (LuSE) regulations require all listed companies in Zambia to have a minimum of25% of their shares held by
public investors to constitute a free float. As a result, Illovo Sugar was required to reduce its shareholding in Zambia Sugarplc by
6.6%. Effective 26 September 2014, 5.1% of the shares were sold to local Zambian institutional investors. Asagreed with LuSE,
the remaining 1.5% will be held in a separate account in the LuSE Central Securities Depository. WhileIllovo will waive its voting
rights on these shares, it will still be entitled to receive dividends thereon.
The results and balance sheet of Primark Mode Ltd. & Co. KG are included in these financial statements and these financial
statements will be filed in Germany. As a consequence, Primark Mode Ltd. & Co. KG is exempt from the requirement to file
itsown financial statements under section 264b HGB.
Associated British Foods plc has irrevocably guaranteed all amounts shown as liabilities in the statutory financial statements
ofthe subsidiary undertakings registered in Ireland listed below in respect of the financial year ended 17 September 2016.
As a consequence, these subsidiaries qualify for the exemption under section 357 of the Companies Act 2014 (Ireland) from
theprovisions of sections 347 and 348 of that Act.
Abdale Finance Limited Primark Senior Executive Pension Trustees Limited
Prima Sizzlers
Primark Limited Sizzles International Unlimited Company
Primark Holdings Ziggys Ireland Unlimited Company
Primark Pension Trustees Limited
Financial statements
2016 2015
Note m m
Fixed assets
Intangible assets 1 20 19
Investments in subsidiaries 2 667 663
687 682
Current assets
Debtors
due within one year 3 4,533 4,275
due after one year 3 325 345
Employee benefits assets due after one year 4 120
Deferred tax assets due after one year 5 31
Derivative assets 68 21
Cash and cash equivalents 273 467
5,230 5,228
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
Bank loans and overdrafts unsecured (17) (81)
Other creditors 6 (2,168) (2,613)
(2,185) (2,694)
Net current assets 3,045 2,534
Total assets less current liabilities 3,732 3,216
Creditors: amounts falling due after one year
Bank loans unsecured (570) (520)
Amounts owed to subsidiaries 6 (309) (318)
Employee benefits liabilities 4 (138) (30)
Deferred tax liabilities 5 (8)
(1,017) (876)
Net assets 2,715 2,340
Capital and reserves
Issued capital 7 45 45
Capital redemption reserve 7 2 2
Hedging reserve 7 (3) (2)
Profit and loss reserve 7 2,671 2,295
Equity shareholders funds 2,715 2,340
Financial statements
The financial statements on pages 149 to 156 were approved by the board of directors on 8 November 2016 and were signed
on its behalf by:
Capital Profit
Share redemption Hedging and loss
capital reserve reserve reserve Total
m m m m m
Balance as at 13 September 2014 45 2 (4) 2,211 2,254
Total comprehensive income
Profit for the period recognised in the income statement 312 312
Remeasurement of defined benefit schemes 35 35
Deferred tax associated with defined benefit schemes (7) (7)
Movements in cash flow hedging position 2 2
Other comprehensive income 2 28 30
Total comprehensive income 2 340 342
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
for the 53 weeks ended 17 September 2016
Basis of preparation
The financial statements are presented insterling, rounded to the nearest million. They are prepared under the historical cost
basis, except that derivative financial instruments are stated at their fair value, and in accordance with Financial Reporting
Standard 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework (FRS 101) and the Companies Act 2006. These financial statements are the
first the Company has prepared in accordance with FRS 101. Details of the impact of transition are given in note 10.
As permitted by FRS 101, the Company has taken advantage of the disclosure exemptions available under that standard
in relation to share-based payments, financial instruments, capital management, presentation of comparative information
in respect of certain assets, presentation of a cash flow statement, standards not yet effective, impairment of assets and
certain related party transactions. Where required, equivalent disclosures are given in the consolidated financial statements.
As permitted by section 408(4) of the Companies Act 2006, a separate income statement and statement of comprehensive
income for the Company has not been included in these financial statements. The principal accounting policies adopted are
described below. They have all been applied consistently to all years presented.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets comprise goodwill arising on business combinations and operating intangibles. Goodwill is defined under
Business combinations on page 103 of the consolidated financial statements. The Companies Act 2006 requires goodwill
to be amortised on a systematic basis over its useful economic life. Under FRS 101 goodwill isnot amortised, but is instead
reviewed for impairment on an annual basis or whenever there are indicators of impairment. The Company istherefore invoking
atrue and fair view override to overcome the requirement to amortise goodwill in the Companies Act 2006. Had the Company
amortised goodwill, a period of three years would have been chosen as its useful life from the date of transition. The profit for
theyear would have been 5m lower had goodwill been amortised in the year.
Intangible assets other than goodwill are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment charges. Amortisation
ischarged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful economic lives of intangible assets from
thedate they are available for use. The estimated useful lives are generally deemed to be no longer than five years.
Investments in subsidiaries
Investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost less any provision for impairment.
Financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets and financial liabilities, except for derivatives, are measured initially at fair value, plus directly attributable
transaction costs, and thereafter at amortised cost.
Derivatives
Derivatives are used to manage the Companys economic exposure to financial risks. The principal instruments used are
foreign exchange contracts and swaps. Derivatives are recognised in the balance sheet at fair value based on market prices
or rates, or calculated using either discounted cash flow or option pricing models. Changes in the value of derivatives are
Financial statements
recognised in the income statement unless they qualify for hedge accounting when recognition of any change in fair value
depends on the nature of the item being hedged.
Pensions and other post-employment benefits
The Company operates one defined contribution and two defined benefit pension schemes. The Company is the principal
employer of the Associated British Foods Pension Scheme, which is a funded final salary scheme that is closed to new
members, as well as a small unfunded final salary scheme. For the defined benefit plans, the amount charged in theincome
statement is the cost of benefits accruing to employees over the year, plus any benefit improvements granted to members by
the Company during the year. It also includes net interest expense or income calculated by applying the liability discountrate
to the net pension asset or liability. The difference between market value of assets and present value of liabilities isdisclosed
as an asset orliability in the balance sheet. Any related deferred tax (to the extent recoverable) is disclosed separately in the
balance sheet. Remeasurements are recognised immediately in other comprehensive income. Surpluses are recognised
only to the extent that they are recoverable. Contributions payable by the group in respect of defined contribution plans are
charged to operating profit asincurred.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
for the 53 weeks ended 17 September 2016
Income tax
Income tax on profit or loss for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the income statement
except to the extent that it relates to items taken directly to equity.
Current tax is the tax expected to be payable on taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted
during the period, together withany adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is provided using thebalance sheet liability method, usingtax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance
sheet date, providingfor temporary differences between the carrying amounts ofassetsand liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and theamounts used for taxation purposes.
A deferred tax asset is recognised only tothe extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the
asset can be utilised.
Share-based payments
The fair value of the share awards at grant date is recognised as an employee expense with a corresponding increase in equity, spread
over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the shares. The amount recognised is adjusted
to reflect expected and actual levels of vesting except where the failure to vest is as a result of not meeting a market condition.
Where the Company grants allocations of shares to employees of its subsidiaries, these are accounted for on the same basis as
allocations to employees of the Company, except that the fair value is recognised as an increase to investment in subsidiaries
with a corresponding increase in equity.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise bank and cash balances, call deposits and short-term investments with original maturities
of three months or less.
1. Intangible assets
Operating
Goodwill intangibles Total
m m m
Cost
At 12 September 2015 14 5 19
Additions 2 2
At 17 September 2016 14 7 21
Amortisation
At 12 September 2015
Amortisation (1) (1)
At 17 September 2016 (1) (1)
2. Investments in subsidiaries
m
At 12 September 2015 663
Additions 4
At 17 September 2016 667
The additions relate to the allocation of shares under equity-settled share-based payment plans to employees of the Companys
subsidiaries. There were no provisions for impairment in either year.
3. Debtors
2016 2015
m m
Amounts falling due within one year
Amounts owed by subsidiaries 4,483 4,254
Other debtors 18 5
Corporation tax recoverable 32 16
Financial statements
4,533 4,275
Amounts falling due after one year
Amounts owed by subsidiaries 325 345
The directors consider that the carrying amount of debtors approximates their fair value.
4. Employee entitlements
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
assets assets liabilities liabilities net net
m m m m m m
Reconciliation of changes in assets and liabilities
At beginning of year 3,343 3,178 (3,253) (3,120) 90 58
Current service cost (33) (37) (33) (37)
Employee contributions 9 9 (9) (9)
Employer contributions 27 30 27 30
Benefit payments (136) (120) 136 120
Settlements (6) 9 3
Past service cost (1) (2) (1) (2)
Interest income/(expense) 123 129 (121) (126) 2 3
Return on scheme assets less interest income 273 123 273 123
Actuarial losses arising from changes
infinancialassumptions (758) (145) (758) (145)
Actuarial gains arising from changes
indemographicassumptions 257 257
Experience gains on scheme liabilities 5 57 5 57
At end of year 3,639 3,343 (3,777) (3,253) (138) 90
Further details of the Associated British Foods Pension Scheme are contained in note 11 of the consolidated financial statements.
Employee Share-based
benefits payments Other Total
m m m m
At 12 September 2015 (18) 5 5 (8)
Amount (credited)/charged to the income statement (1) 1
Amount charged/(credited) to equity 42 (2) 40
Effect of changes in tax rates on income statement (1) (1)
At 17 September 2016 23 3 5 31
6. Other creditors
2016 2015
m m
Amounts falling due within one year
Other taxation and social security 1 1
Accruals and deferred income 65 47
Amounts owed to subsidiaries 2,102 2,565
2,168 2,613
Amounts falling due after one year
Amounts owed to subsidiaries 309 318
The directors consider that the carrying amount of creditors approximates their fair value.
8. Contingent liabilities
Where the Company enters into financial guarantee contracts to guarantee the indebtedness of other companies within its group,
the Company considers these to be insurance arrangements and accounts for them as such. The guarantee contract is treated
asa contingent liability until such time as it becomes probable that the Company will be required to make a payment under
theguarantee.
The Company had provided 709m of guarantees in the ordinary course of business as at 17 September 2016 (2015 538m).
9. Related parties
The Company has a controlling shareholder relationship with its parent company, Wittington Investments Limited, with the
trustees of the Garfield Weston Foundation and with certain other individuals who hold shares in the Company. Further details
ofthe controlling shareholder relationship are included in note 29 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company has a
related party relationship with its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures and directors. In the course of normal operations,
related party transactions entered into by the Company have been contracted on an arms length basis.
Material transactions and year end balances with related parties (excluding wholly owned subsidiaries) were as follows:
2016 2015
Sub note 000 000
Charges to Wittington Investments Limited in respect of services provided by the Company 1,226 661
Charges to fellow subsidiary undertakings on normal trading terms 1 60
Dividends paid by the Company and received in a beneficial capacity by:
(i) trustees of the Garfield Weston Foundation 1 10,012 9,838
(ii) directors of Wittington Investments Limited who are not trustees of the Foundation 1 2,613 1,529
(iii) directors of the Company who are not trustees of the Foundation and are not directors of
Wittington Investments Limited 1 54 50
(iv) members of the Weston family employed within the Associated British Foods group 1 2 1,011
Charges to non-wholly owned subsidiaries 2 193 116
Charges to joint ventures 2 3
Interest income earned from non-wholly owned subsidiaries 2 211 228
Amounts due from non-wholly owned subsidiaries 2 31,335 7,077
Amounts due to non-wholly owned subsidiaries 2 8
1. Details of the nature of the relationships with these bodies are set out in note 28 of the consolidated financial statements.
2.Details of the Companys subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are set out in note 29 of the consolidated financialstatements.
Financial statements
Goodwill
Under previous UK GAAP, goodwill was amortised over its useful economic life. Under FRS 101, goodwill is considered to have
an indefinite life in line with IAS 38 Intangible Assets and is no longer amortised. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment in
accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. In adopting FRS 101, the Company took advantage of the transitional exemption
to use the previous UK GAAP carrying value of goodwill at the transition date (14m) as its deemed cost. The 5m goodwill
amortisation previously charged to the income statement for the 52 weeks ended 12 September 2015 has been reversed.
Employee entitlements
Under previous UK GAAP, the Company took advantage of the exemption available in FRS 17 to account for contributions
arising from its membership of a multi-employer defined benefit scheme as if they were contributions to a defined contribution
scheme, on the basis that the Company was unable to identify its share of the underlying assets and liabilities on a consistent
and reasonable basis.
Under FRS 101, members of a multi-employer defined benefit scheme are required to recognise their share of the costs
andnetasset or liability arising under the plan. Where there is no contractual agreement or stated policy for identifying this
allocation to individual member companies, the full amounts are to be recognised in the individual financial statements of the
principal employer of the defined benefit scheme. On transition to FRS 101, the Company has been identified as the principal
employer of the Associated British Foods Pension Scheme and has therefore recognised that scheme in full in its individual
financial statements.
Deferred tax
Under previous UK GAAP, the liability for a small unfunded defined benefit scheme was presented net of the related deferred
tax asset. Under FRS 101, the deferred tax assets have been separately disclosed. Other deferred tax assets were previously
recognised within debtors but under FRS 101 are separately disclosed along with other deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Equity shareholders funds as at 13 September 2014
At 13 September 2014, a net defined benefit surplus of 87m was recognised in respect of the Associated British Foods
Pension scheme, together with a related deferred tax liability of 17m. The net impact of 70m was reflected against the
profit and loss reserve.
Equity shareholders funds as at 12 September 2015
At 12 September 2015, a net defined benefit surplus of 120m was recognised in respect of the Associated British Foods
Pension scheme, together with a related deferred tax liability of 24m. The net impact of 96m was reflected against the profit
and loss reserve. In addition, the 5m goodwill amortisation previously charged to the income statement for the 52 weeks
ended 12 September 2015 has been reversed, together with the related tax impact of 1m.
Basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share (pence) 70.3 74.0 96.5 66.8 103.4
Adjusted earnings per share (pence) 87.2 98.1 104.1 101.5 106.2
Dividends per share (pence) 28.5 32.0 34.0 35.0 36.75
Figures from 2013 onwards reflect the revised IAS 19 Employee Benefits standard. Figures from 2015 onwards reflect the
amendments to IAS 41 Agriculture and IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment.
COMPANY DIRECTORY
Registrar Timetable
Equiniti Interim dividend paid
Aspect House 1 July 2016
Spencer Road Final dividend to be paid
Lancing BN99 6DA 13 January 2017
Auditors Annual general meeting
Ernst & Young LLP Chartered Accountants 9 December 2016
Bankers Interim results to be announced
Barclays Bank PLC 19 April 2017
Lloyds Banking Group plc
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc Website
www.abf.co.uk
This report contains forward-looking statements. These have been made by the directors in good faith based on the information available
to them upto the time of their approval of this report. The directors can give noassurance that these expectations will prove to have
been correct. Dueto the inherent uncertainties, including both economic and business riskfactors underlying such forward-looking
information, actual results maydiffer materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The directors
undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Associated British Foods plc
Weston Centre
10 Grosvenor Street
London
W1K 4QY
Tel + 44 (0) 20 7399 6500
Fax + 44 (0) 20 7399 6580