The document analyzes 5 questions and determines whether they would lead to reasonable arguments or pseudo-arguments. Question 2 about the ethics of capturing dolphins and orcas for entertainment is identified as a reasonable argument topic because it touches on an issue with facts on both sides. Questions 1, 3, 4 and 5 are deemed pseudo-arguments as they are based on individual opinions and tastes, preventing a shared foundation for reasonable debate.
The document analyzes 5 questions and determines whether they would lead to reasonable arguments or pseudo-arguments. Question 2 about the ethics of capturing dolphins and orcas for entertainment is identified as a reasonable argument topic because it touches on an issue with facts on both sides. Questions 1, 3, 4 and 5 are deemed pseudo-arguments as they are based on individual opinions and tastes, preventing a shared foundation for reasonable debate.
The document analyzes 5 questions and determines whether they would lead to reasonable arguments or pseudo-arguments. Question 2 about the ethics of capturing dolphins and orcas for entertainment is identified as a reasonable argument topic because it touches on an issue with facts on both sides. Questions 1, 3, 4 and 5 are deemed pseudo-arguments as they are based on individual opinions and tastes, preventing a shared foundation for reasonable debate.
The document analyzes 5 questions and determines whether they would lead to reasonable arguments or pseudo-arguments. Question 2 about the ethics of capturing dolphins and orcas for entertainment is identified as a reasonable argument topic because it touches on an issue with facts on both sides. Questions 1, 3, 4 and 5 are deemed pseudo-arguments as they are based on individual opinions and tastes, preventing a shared foundation for reasonable debate.
RHET 1312 Professor Foster Individual Task Which of the following questions will lead to reasonable arguments and which will lead to only to pseudo-arguments? Imagining someone who disagrees with you, explain why you think the question is arguable (or not) in a short written passage. 1. Are the Star Wars films good science fiction? Pseudo-argument: This is considered a pseudo-argument because the answers would vary based on an individuals opinions on the topic. 2. Is it ethically justifiable to capture dolphins or orca whales and train them for human entertainment? Reasonable argument: This is a reasonable argument question because the topic touches on the ethics of an issue that could have multiple answers that could be supported with facts. 3. Should cities subsidize professional sports venues? Pseudo-argument: This can be considered a pseudo argument question because, although there are opposing sides, if there is no commonality on the issue then the argument cant become a reasonable argument. 4. Is this abstract oil painting created by a monkey smearing paint on a canvas a true work of art? Pseudo-argument: This is considered a pseudo-argument because, the answers would not be shared amongst those who are conversing, without a shared foundation the argument cannot be reasonable. 5. Are nose rings and tongue rings attractive? Pseudo-argument: This is considered a pseudo-argument question because this question is opinion-based, although you can take surveys to figure out who finds piercing attractive, the options would consist of those who find them attractive and those who dont.