1682 doi 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2013.11.

26 J South Med Univ, 2013, 33(11): 1682-1684

1 2 1

1 2

528000

50 A
B-E )
+ 1.00 mm/min
45 0.230.17
kN1.270.41 kN P<0.05
0.550.31 kN

P<0.05 + 0.890.40 kN
0.980.34 kNP>0.05 +

Effects of different restoration methods on fracture resistance of endodontically treated

teeth
LIN Tianci1, LIANG Cuiyun2, HUANG Dahong1
Department of Prosthodontics Foshan Stomatological Hospital, 2Department of Stomatology Foshan University of Science and Technology
1

Medical College, Foshan 528000, China

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of different restoration methods on fracture resistance of endodontically treated
teeth. Methods Fifty intact extracted maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into 5 groups. Medial-occlusal cavity
models were established in all the test groups (B-E) according to the same standard, followed by treatments with defect
exposure only, defect filling with light cured composite resin, indirect resin inlays, or light cured composite resin combined
with Biosplint fiber. Each specimen was tested using a universal test machine at 1.00 mm/min until fracture and the fracture
load was recorded. The load angle was 45 degree to the long axis of the teeth, and the load was pointed to the middle of the
lingual surface on the buccal cusp. The fracture resistance was analyzed statistically. Results The mean load to cause fracture
of the samples in each group group A to E was 1.27 0.41, 0.23 0.17, 0.55 0.31, 0.89 0.40, and 0.98 0.34 kN, respectively,
showing significant differences between the groups. Conclusion The fracture resistance of the teeth is reduced after
endodontic therapy, but can be increased significantly by restoration with composite resin inlay or light cured composite resin
combined with Biosplint fiber.
Key words: endodontic therapy; restoration;fracture resistance; mechanical property

2
1


2 2 --(mesial-
3 711 82.1% occlusal-distal cavity, MOD)MOD

4
6

65.8% 7
5 8

2013-07-23

10152800001000008

E-mail: lintc82@sina.com

0757-82800584
E-mail: fshuangdh@
126.com
 http://www.j-smu.com J South Med Univ, 2013, 33(11): 1682-1684 1683

1 30 s
3 mm 15 s

20 s15 s 20 s
3 mm Biosplint



1 20 s
1.1 20 s
2012 10~2012 12 1.3.2
150
9

0.2 mm
100 ml/L 2 mm
1.2 2 cm 37
1.3.3
3MP603M
Biosplint
45 1.0 mm/min
10

VIP
Bisco 1.4
CU420 SPSS13.0
q (Newman-Keuls
1.3 )
1.3.1 50 5 P<0.05
50
10 5 2
5A-E 10 5 1
A
B-E P<0.05 q
- (mesial-occlusal cavity, RCTP<0.05
MO)MO B 0.230.17 kN
RCT
C D 0.550.31 kN0.89
E 0.40 kN0.980.34 kN
+Biosplint
Biosplint 1.270.41 kN
P>0.05 BC

1
Tab.1 Fracture resistances of the 5 groups (n=10, MeanSD, kN)
Group Fracture load F P

(A) Control group: without defect 1.270.41a

(B) RCTMO cavity 0.230.17b

(C) RCTMO cavityresin plombage 0.550.31c 14.23 <0.001

(D) RCTMO cavityresin inlay 0.890.40a

(E) RCTMO cavityresin plombage+Biosplint fiber 0.980.34a

Note: Different letters stand for significant differences between groups (P<0.05). RCT: root canal therapy; MO:
mesial-occlusal cavity.
 1684 J South Med Univ, 2013, 33(11): 1682-1684 http://www.j-smu.com

3


+

11
E

1 P>0.05



2 Biosplint
3


4




20

5 21
22

23

24



12






+

MO


B


A












C
1 , . J. , 2005, 15(6):

350-3.
2 Ehrmann EH, Tyas MJ. Craked tooth sydrome: diagnosis,treatment
and correlation between symptoms and post-extraction findingJ.
Aust Dent J, 1990, 35(2): 105-12.

3 , , , . 711()J.
, 1997, 20(4): 56-7.
13
4 Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, et al. Fracture resistance of
14
endodontically treated teeth restored with composite postsJ. J
15 16 Prosth Dent, 2003, 89(4): 360-7.
5 Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, et al. Fracture resistance of
endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restoredJ. Am J
Dent, 1997, 10(5): 237-41.
6 , , . CEREC/

J. , 2009, 31(12): 1217-8.

7 , , , . 90.

J. :, 2012, 33(2): 205-8.
8 , , , . ()
Nothdurft
17 18
J. , 2006, 24(1): 26-8.
9 , .

J. , 2013, 33( 05): 303-6.

10Geurtsen W, Schwarze T, Gnay H. Diagnosis, therapy, and
P>0.05
prevention of the cracked tooth syndromeJ. Quintessence Int,

2003, 34(6): 409-17.

11, , . J.
, 1988, 2( 01): 5-7+65.
19 1688
 1688 J South Med Univ, 2013, 33(11): 1685-1688 http://www.j-smu.com

3 , , . Inflamm Res, 2004, 53(7): 304-8.

J. , 2007, 17(2): 1-4. 13, . BJ.
4 , , . Cajal , 2007, 14(3): 443-4.
J. , 2010, 19(2): 80-2. 14, .
5 Michelet P, Guervilly C, Hlaine A, et al. Adding ketamine to J. , 2009, 21(8): 10-4.
morphine for patient-controlled analgesia after thoracic surgery: 15Fitzgibbon EJ, Hall P, Schroder C, et al. Low dose ketamine as an
influence on morphine consumption, respiratory function, and analgesic adjuvant in difficult pain syndromes: a strategy for
nocturnal desaturationJ. Br J Anaesth, 2007, 99(3): 396-403. conversion from parenteral to oral ketamineJ. J pain and symptom
6 Chang ML, Yang J, Kem S, et al. Nicotinamide and ketamine reduce management, 2002, 23(2): 165-70.
infarct volume and DNA fragmentation in rats after brain ischemia 16Eleftheriadis E, Kotzampassi K, Papanotas K, et al. Gut ischemia,
and reperfusionJ. Neurosci Lett, 2002, 322(3): 137-40. oxidative stress, and bacterial translocation in elevated abdominal
7 Park JW, Jung YH, Baek CW, et al. Effects of low dose ketamine pressure in ratsJ. World J Surg, 1996, 20(1): 11-6.
on tourniquet-induced haemodynamic responses during general 17Y AY, E RE, T ET, et al. In creased in tra-abdom in alpressure
anaesthesiaJ. J Int Med Res, 2007, 35(5): 600-8.
impaire liver regeneration after partial hapatectomy in ratsJ. J
8Yslmaz S, Ates E, Polat C, et al. Ischemic preconditioning decreases
Surg, 2002, 108(2): 250-7.
laparoscopy-induced oxidative stress in small intestine J.
18Yagci G, Zeybek N, Kaymakcioglu N, et al. Increased intra-
Hepatogastroenterology, 2003, 50(52): 979-82.
abdominal pressure causes bacterial translocation in rabbitsJ. J
9Petrat F, Swoboda S, de Groot H, et al. Quantification of
Chin Med Assoc, 2005, 68(4): 172-7.
ischemia-reperfusion injury to the small intestine using a
19, , .
macroscopic scoreJ. J Invest Surg, 2010, 23(4): 208-17.
J. , 2013, 33(6): 431-5.
10Mallick IH, Yang W, Winslet MC, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion injury
20 . J.
of the intestine and protective strategies against injuryJ. Dig Dis
, 2010, 30(1): 23-5.
Sci, 2004, 49(9): 1359-77.
21, , , .
22
11Sun J, Wang XD, Liu H, et al. Ketamine suppresses intestinal
J. , 2012, 32(2): 274-6.
NF-kappa B activation and proinflammatory cytokine in endotoxic
22Mujici E, Duri A, Radovanovio J. Influence of CO2 pneumo-
ratsJ. World J Gastroenterol, 2004, 10(7): 1028-31.
peritoneum on liver functionJ. Med Arh, 2006, 60(2): 87-9.
12Sun J, Zhou ZQ, Lv R, et al. Ketamine inhibits LPS-induced
calcium elevation and NF-kappa B activation in monocytesJ.

1684 2008, 36(6): 444-9.

12, . 18 , , , .
J. , 2010, 18(4): 206-8. J. , 2007, 23(2): 264-7.
13, , , . 19, , , .
J. , 2005, 6(4): 268-270, J. : , 2012, 30(5):
274. 73-6.
14, , . J. 20Karaman AI, Kir N, Belli S. Four applications of reinforced
, 2008, 1(5): 313-6. polyethylene fiber material in orthodontic practiceJ. Am J Orthod
15, .
J. Dentofacial Orthop, 2002, 121(6): 650-4.
, 2006, 41(6): 321-2. 21. J.
16 , , . , 2009, 17(8): 371-3.
J. , 2010, 20(12): 705-9. 22 . J. , 2008, 43(7): 405.
17Nothdurft FP, Seidel E, Gebhart F, et al. The fracture behavior of 23 , , .
premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct J. , 2011, 16(3): 161-2.
composite restorations and endodontic post systemsJ. J Dent,