Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Fight For The Preservation of My Backyard 1
The Fight For The Preservation of My Backyard 1
The Fight For The Preservation of My Backyard 1
02/25/2017
The Fight for the Preservation of my Backyard 2
Homo sapiens wish to take ownership of the land and conquer it. Where in truth we are
more so one species of a vast community trying to compete for our own piece of it. Through the
development of technology the competition of land dominance has become nil. The fight is no
longer a true competition for the land and animals. Land should not be a matter for the humans to
buy, sell, and trade in an economic ethical purpose only, but rather what would be best ethically
The struggle of educating the public has become a never ending battle. If a social
yourself/family and the government will assist in the maintenance of your land for the future of
our generations to enjoy and partake of as well, then there might be a chance for change. The
average population certainly has the same general mindsight: do as we wish with the land and
use it as we please, because there are no consequences and nature will correct any wrong doing.
With this same mindsight of people continuing on a daily basis our lands will not continue to be
as they were 200 years ago, 100 years ago, or even almost 65 years ago when this very article
was published. Through these thoughts alone the next generations are being raised to be less and
Obligations to take care of the earth and the earth in return will provide for you is falling
short. It is truly shameful how some individuals treat our land today, and sadly enough those
people who do not respect the land and its values is still a respected and valued member of the
community. There is yet to be enough social discord to those who misuse the land. Opportunities
have been given to maintain lands with assistance, free of charge, but many only seek to do that
The Fight for the Preservation of my Backyard 3
which is immediately profitable to themselves. Until recently communities have taken much of
the land for granted and not seen the value of different species. Some have sought the
extermination of specific species for their own special interests and personal gains.
My personal conservation philosophy is that the land is very important for us. Sadly the
world that we currently live in believes that it is more for economic gain rather than an ethical
use and maintenance of our land. We have taken many species for granted and used them for the
wrong purposes. Homo sapiens almost feel like a plague, because everywhere we go we have
deforestation, beloved animals going on the endangered species list, and land being traumatized
When I was a child I never really thought of the land around me and how to preserve it. I
knew I didnt like spiders so I would step on them anytime I would see them. I didnt understand
the role a spider plays in our biotic community, in which a spider makes a web as its home and
in-turn the web catches flies or others that get caught in it and the spider then uses that individual
for food. Since I was a child I have grown to understand that every species plays an important
role in our world. The spiders help maintain the population of flies which I equally do not like.
Through the development of my relationship with the world I have come to learn how we
maintain it, preserve it, and equally destroy it. I want my children, their children, and so on to be
able to experience this beautiful world that we live in. I want them to be able to see all of these
species that are currently endangered such as many species of elephants which I personally have
My husband and his family love to go hunting every year. We have to put our names into
a drawing every year and hope that we get drawn so that we will have tag to hunt a deer. Now
this may simply be a tradition for my family but we still follow the law, even though we only get
The Fight for the Preservation of my Backyard 4
a deer about once every 15 years. Humans that simply care for themselves and conquering every
footprint they make dont care about getting a tag to hunt a deer, or where they hunt a deer, or if
the deer is a doe or a buck, they simply care about showing off and doing as they please with no
regard to the community. We need to understand our place in the environment and that many
creatures are dangerous even with our current technology. I understand in paying respect to the
environment and thanking it for providing for us to live and maintain living.
Our generations are getting worse, in over 80 years since Leopold addressed obligations
had turned into privileges, it has since transformed into rights. This current generation thats
becoming adults all believe that they have a right to every little thing. The land-relation now is
even more economic. The price on land is rising everyday as humans try to each pin down a
piece of it to claim their ownership. Value on our biotic communities are becoming less every
year. Privileges have blended into rights, establishing that only economics in this world have
merit, and the land will only continue to be destroyed by humans that believe in conquering is
I would think that with the Land Ethic extending its sensibilities, everyone would be
more conscious to the preservation of our animals, lands, and waters. With reflection the Land
Ethic has yet to penetrate many communities. The Duckbill an iconic rock formation in Oregon
was just this last September destroyed due to a group of vandals who went and pushed it over for
what they believed them doing the world Oregon a favor. This incident alone shows that people
have not become sensitive to our world and their treatment of it but rather theyre lacking the
respect for the world and are insensitive of their treatment. Even more disappointing is the lack
of laws and restraints for destruction of our public land and monuments. I dont understand
The Fight for the Preservation of my Backyard 5
Leopolds point on that the land ethic would influence non-humans sensibilities, since they are
simply doing their best and following nature's course and dont have any control over humans.
I do agree with Leopold when he notes that things are best to be maintained as they are
and it is wrong when it does otherwise. I dont believe that Leopold was suggesting that the
integrity of the biotic community is more important than its individual members, because the
individual members create the biotic community and without that established then the
community as a whole could be thrown out of balance and then there would be nothing to
preserve. Each member of the community is valuable, some more so than others. These
implications show that the preservation of such communities is key and without these
communities he notes in his article that many different factors about an environment can be
compromised. The community is more than just plants, or animals. Without all aspects of a
community other parts of the community can then become damaged, such as the fertility of soil.
The motivation for maintaining and preserving our lands is not ethics or beauty but rather
both. I cant admit an ethical responsibility without noticing the beauty I wish to preserve.
Regarding my beliefs with Leopolds I understand that he felt the same way. When he held a
standard to maintain an ethical relationship he in turn felt love, respect, admiration, and high
regard for its value. I dont believe that anyone could begin to have a coexisting and respectful
relationship with our land without noticing its beauty as they began to take care of it.
I believe that my land ethic is composed of non-human elements. When humans take the
time to go on a hike or spend some time in nature rather than a city with all of our man-made
objects and the oppression of nature, they begin to see the value in the serenity. Land is more
than us humans, and the hustle of life. Sometimes we just need to take sometime, slow down,
The Fight for the Preservation of my Backyard 6
and appreciate the world that hasnt been completely ravished by humans. Listen to the birds,
In all honesty the land ethic is both useful and nonuseful. It is somewhat of a difficult
read in places, especially the beginning which I didnt understand as a basis of establishing the
topic, by using Odysseus, but aside from that it is a useful read. It establishes that the world is
going in the wrong direction for preserving our lands for upcoming generations. Knowing that
Leopold had this published in 1949, sets a fantastic backbone for the integrity of his work, and
It was a useful exercise to see different views than just my own and I learned some new
things that I hadnt known before, such as larger predators are lopped off the apex of the
pyramid; food chains, for the first time in history, become shorter rather than longer. Previously
I hadnt really thought of it in that view of the larger predators (primarily humans) are now
The reading did change my opinion a little bit in the terms that we seek for a solution
such as what they tried with the farmers in Wisconsin. We seek a solution like they tried with the
farmers, we hope that if the government holds their hand then maybe we could finally get
somewhere and maintain some order. I see now that such an easy civilized solution may never be
possible. Sometimes people just need to be told exactly what to do regardless of their feeling or
opinions. That may be the only solution, but at the same time I dont see true success on the
horizon with that option, because there will never be true change unless they choose to change
for themselves.
My opinion of preserving our lands as they are for future generations still stands in
agreement with Leopold that It is inconceivable to me that an ethical relationship [with land]
The Fight for the Preservation of my Backyard 7
can exist without love, respect, admiration, and a high regard for its value. It will be a long hard
fight for our lands and their preservation especially with the regards the current generation has
for its wellbeing. Hopefully there will be something to preserve when the general populous